Stanleytown Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 363 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 170 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to appropriately store and/or serve resident food items. The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure residents' beverages (orange juice, apple juice, cranberry juice, and iced tea) were appropriately stored and/or served. The following information was found in a facility dietary policy titled Meal Distribution (with a date of October 2019): It is the center policy that meals are transported to the dining locations in a manner that insures proper temperature maintenance, protects against contamination, and are delivered in a timely and accurate manner. On 4/16/24 at 9:25 a.m., two (2) carts used to transport breakfast to the facility's residents on the nursing units were noted to have been placed outside a door leading to the facility's kitchen. One of these carts had three (3) pitchers of beverages placed on the top of the cart; the Dietary Services Manager (DSM) reported that the beverages were orange juice, cranberry juice, and apple juice. The other cart had one (1) pitcher of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, facility staff failed to administer medicated shampoo as ordered for 1 of 23 residents in the survey sample (Resident #42). Resident #42 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including psoriasis, above the knee amputation, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, end stage renal disease, anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. On the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, the resident scored 15/15 on the Brief Interview For Mental Status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, behaviors affecting care, or rejecting care. The assessment indicated the resident was fully dependent for showering and bathing and required substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene (includes washing and drying face and combing hair). During initial tour on 4/15/24 at approximately 4:20 PM, the resident's face appeared red and skin was peeling over about 30% of face. The resident's hair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure complete and/or accurate clinical records for one (1) of 23 sampled residents (Resident #82). The findings include: Resident #82's clinical record included documentation that indicated the resident was administered medications when the resident was not present at the facility. Resident #82's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/2/24, was signed as completed on 3/6/24. Resident #82 was assessed as being able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #82's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact and/or borderline cognition. Resident #82 was assessed as requiring assistance with toileting hygiene, dressing, and bathing. Resident #82's clinical documentation indicated the resident was not present at the facility on 4/5/24. Resident #82's medication administration record (MAR) indicated the following medications were administered at 9:00 a.m. on 4/5/24 (when the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident who is fed by enteral means received the provider ordered tube feeding nutrition and hydration for 1 of 2 residents who received tube feedings, Resident #5. The findings included: The facility nursing staff failed to set Resident #5's tube feeding at the provider order rate of 60 ml/hour. The rate was observed to be set at 55 ml/hour. Resident #5's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, aphasia, gastrostomy status, diabetes, and dysphagia. There was no completed Minimum Data Set assessment for this resident. Resident #5 was nonverbal. Resident #5's care plan included the focus area at risk for complications related to the need for an enteral tube feeding. Interventions included, administer tube feedings and flushes per order and Registered Dietician consult as needed. Resident #5's clinical record included a provider order for Glucerna 1.5 at 60 ml/hour. The order date was documented as 02/09/24. On 02/09/24 the dietician had transcribed a progress note that read…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, employee record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property as evidenced by failure to pre-screen 2 of 25 new hire employees #22 and #25. Both employees were agency Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). The findings included: The facility staff failed to obtain reference checks per their policy for two agency employees #22 and #25. A review of employee records revealed the following. New hire #22 (agency) hire date 01/24/23 employee file did not include any reference checks. This staff last worked at the facility in 02/17/23. New hire #25 (agency) hire date 02/03/23 employee file did not include any reference checks. This staff last worked at the facility on 03/31/23. The facility provided the survey team with a copy of their policy titled, Prevention/Screening/Training. This policy read in part, .Criminal background and reference checks are performed on all employees . 04/12/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident representative interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the residents receive care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and/or medical provider orders for 2 of 25 residents in the survey sample, Residents #25 and #264. The findings included: 1. For Resident #25, the facility staff failed to perform a hemoccult test to detect the presence of occult blood in the stool according to the medical provider's direction. Resident #25's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Fibromyalgia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, History of Venous Thrombosis and Embolism, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Alzheimer's Disease. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/04/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 12 out of 15 indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #25's current comprehensive person-centered care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan and physician's orders for 1 of 25 residents in the survey sample, Resident #75. The findings included: For Resident #75, the facility staff failed to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician. Resident #75's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Nonrheumatic Aortic Insufficiency, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen, Chronic Kidney Disease, Morbid Obesity, Dementia, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/03/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #75 was coded as requiring extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 25 residents in the survey sample, Residents #75 and #30. The findings included: 1. For Resident #75, the facility staff failed to administer Novolin 70/30 as ordered by the medical provider. Novolin 70/30 is an intermediate acting insulin used to control blood sugar. Resident #75's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Nonrheumatic Aortic Insufficiency, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Morbid Obesity. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/03/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #75's current physician's orders included active orders for Novolin 70/30 10 units subcutaneously in the morning and hold if blood sugar was less than…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs of the resident for 1 of 25 residents, Resident #94. The findings included: For Resident #94, the facility staff failed to obtain the provider ordered labs TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) and LFT (liver function test). Resident #94's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, adult failure to thrive, hyperlipidemia, and chronic kidney disease. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #94's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/15/23 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 11 out of a possible 15 points. Resident #94's clinical record included a pharmacy recommendation dated 01/16/23 for a LFT and TSH due to the residents Amiodarone therapy. 02/08/23, Family Nurse Practitioner ordered LFT and TSH laboratory tests due to Amiodarone therapy. During the clinical record review, the surveyor was unable to locate any results for the ordered laboratory tests. 04/11/23 11:20 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one (1) of 25 residents (Resident #100). The findings include: Resident #100's clinical record included a list of diagnoses. End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) was incorrectly listed as one of Resident #100's diagnoses. No medical provider documentation was found to support the diagnosis of ESRD. Resident #100's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 2/26/23, was dated as completed on 3/4/23. Resident #100 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #100's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 13 out of 15; this indicated intact and/or borderline cognition. Resident #100 was assessed as requiring assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #100 discharge documentation, from a local hospital, included the medical problem of Acute Renal Failure. This discharge document was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA