Burke Health & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 900 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 86.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 277 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.91 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a clean homelike environment for 1 Resident (Resident #38) in a survey sample of 38 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #38, the facility staff failed to provide a clean and homelike environment by ensuring cobwebs were removed. On 6/27/23 at approximately 2:00 PM, Surveyor C visited Resident #38 in his room. Surveyor C noticed 2 cobwebs in the ceiling corner of the room over the Resident's bedside table. On 6/27/23 at 2:50 PM, LPN C accompanied Surveyor C to Resident #38's room. LPN C was shown the cobwebs and confirmed them. On 6/27/23 at approximately 3 PM, the Director of Nursing came to the room and confirmed the above findings. The DON confirmed that this was not acceptable and reported rooms are cleaned by housekeeping. On 6/28/23, an interview was conducted with the housekeeping manager/Employee F. Employee F confirmed that housekeeping cleans rooms daily and performs deep cleaning of rooms monthly. Employee F provided Surveyor C…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure nursing standards of practice were followed for 2 Residents (Resident #15 and #217) in a survey sample of 38 Residents. The findings included: 1) For Resident #15, LPN D failed to verify the right resident during medication pass. On 6/29/23 at 9:58 AM, LPN D was observed during the medication administration. LPN D pulled and prepared the medication for Resident #217, which was a total of 8 pills (tablets and capsules). The medications were: Amlodipine Besylate 10 MG tablet for hypertension/blood pressure, Oxycodone 5 mg immediate release tablet for pain, Budesonide extended release 3 mg capsule for Crohn's disease, Carvedilol 6.25 mg tablet for hypertension, Venlafaxine HCl extended release 150 mg capsule for depression, Prevacid delayed release 30 mg capsule for gastroesophageal reflux, Dicyclomine HCl 20 mg tablet for irritable bowel syndrome and Sodium Bicarbonate 650 mg tablet for hyponatremia. Upon entering the room, LPN D approached Resident #15, who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement a system to account for and reconcile controlled drugs on 1 of 2 nursing units. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to implement their system of reconciliation to ensure the appropriate quantity of controlled medications was accurate on 2 of 4 medication carts inspected. 1a. On 06/28/23 at 05:19 PM, a medication storage inspection was conducted of the second floor, medication cart 1 with LPN E. During the verification of the controlled medications, it was determined that the controlled count was not correct. For one Resident who had Gabapentin 100 mg capsules, the medication card had 25 capsules, the reconciliation sheet said there should be 24 capsules present. For another Resident who had Armodafinil 200 mg tablets, the medication card had 19 tablets and the count sheet/reconciliation sheet indicated that 18 tablets should be present. LPN E confirmed the above findings. When asked about the process, LPN E said that at each shift change the off-going and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. There were 9 medication errors in 31 opportunities, resulting in an 29.03% error rate. The findings included: On 6/29/23 at 9:58 AM, LPN D was observed during medication administration. LPN D pulled and prepared the medication for Resident #217, which was a total of 8 pills (tablets and capsules). The medications were: Amlodipine Besylate 10 MG tablet for hypertension/blood pressure, Oxycodone 5 mg immediate release tablet for pain, Budesonide extended release 3 mg capsule for Crohn's disease, Carvedilol 6.25 mg tablet for hypertension, Venlafaxine HCl extended release 150 mg capsule for depression, Prevacid delayed release 30 mg capsule for gastroesophageal reflux, Dicyclomine HCl 20 mg tablet for irritable bowel syndrome and Sodium Bicarbonate 650 mg tablet for hyponatremia. Upon entering the room, LPN D approached Resident #15, who was the roommate of Resident #217. LPN D made no attempts to verify the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to properly store medications on 2 of 4 medication carts inspected. The findings included: For 2 of 4 medication carts inspected, the facility staff failed to label insulin with the open date to ensure it is not used beyond the expiration date. On [DATE] at 05:19 PM, an inspection was conducted of the second-floor cart 1, in the presence of LPN E. The following was noted: A Lantus Solostar pen was open, had been used, and had no open date. A Humalog 100-unit multi-dose vial was dated [DATE]. LPN E stated, today is last day, indicating it was good for 31 days. On [DATE] at 05:34 PM, an inspection of the 2nd floor, cart 2, was conducted. LPN F was present during the inspection and confirmed the findings. The following was noted. An Insulin Aspart 100 U/ML multi-dose vial was opened and had no date to indicate when it was opened. The label said, discard after 28 days. LPN F confirmed she had no way to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide COVID-19 bivalent vaccines for 4 residents, Residents #19, #31, #54, and #67, out of 5 residents reviewed for COVID-19 bivalent immunization. The findings included: The facility staff failed to provide COVID-19 bivalent immunization for Residents #19, #31, #54, and #67. On 6/28/23 at approximately 2:30 PM, clinical record reviews were performed and revealed the following: A. For Resident #19, the clinical record review revealed no evidence of an offer to provide the resident with a COVID-19 bivalent vaccine or documentation of resident refusal or medical contraindication. B. For Resident #31, the clinical record review revealed no evidence of an offer to provide the resident with a COVID-19 bivalent vaccine or documentation of resident refusal or medical contraindication. C. For Resident #54, the clinical record review revealed no evidence of an offer to provide the resident with a COVID-19 bivalent vaccine or documentation of resident refusal or medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, Resident and family interview, staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment for Residents on 2 nursing halls in a sample of 6 nursing halls inspected. The findings included: On 6/27/23, during initial tour observations were made in multiple rooms on the first floor, halls 2 and 3 of privacy curtains (located to wrap around the bed for each Resident) to have brown stains and brown solid matter on them. On the afternoon of 6/27/23, an interview was conducted with Resident #320, who had a family member visiting. Resident #320 pointed out to Surveyor C the privacy curtain which had brown stains and solid matter that the Resident identified as feces. Resident #320 reported he had let facility nursing staff know but nothing had been done. The family member of Resident #320 showed Surveyor C her bag that she brings in daily with a disinfectant cleaner and Lysol spray because when she arrives, she, has to empty, clean and disinfect the bedside commode, because the facility staff do not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to offer and/or provide Advance Directive planning for 1 Resident, (Resident #317), in a survey sample of 38 Residents. The findings included: The facility staff failed to identify the wishes of Resident #317 with regards to code status, to uphold the Residents wishes in the event of cardiac arrest. On [DATE], a clinical record review of Resident #317's record was conducted. This review revealed that in the hospital records Resident #317 was noted as a code status of DNR (do not resuscitate). Review of the physician orders noted there was no order with regards to code status, which would direct facility staff in the event of cardiopulmonary arrest, if they were to perform CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) or not. Review of the care plan for Resident #317 was reviewed and the code status and advance directive wishes of Resident #317 were not addressed. All the progress notes for Resident #317 were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, Resident interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide assistance with eating for 1 resident (Resident #84) in a survey sample of 38 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #84, who was dependent upon facility staff for assistance with eating, the facility staff failed to provide meal set-up and feeding assistance. Resident #84's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an assessment reference date of 5/24/23. This assessment noted Resident #84 as having required extensive assistance of one staff member for eating. Review of the clinical record was conducted. This review revealed Resident #84 was on hospice care. Resident #84 was identified in his care plan as being at risk for weight loss. It read, Nutritional Risk: [name redacted] is at nutritional risk d/t [due to] hx [history] pressure ulcers, on hospice care with expended medical decline. The goal read, [different Resident name, not Resident #84, name redacted] will have adequate nutrition for comfort/autonomy through next review.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care as ordered by the physician and consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 Resident (Resident #38) in a survey sample of 38 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #38, the facility staff failed to 1) provide oxygen via a concentrator, at the level ordered by the physician 2) failed to store the suction Yankauer in a manner to prevent contamination, 3) failed to replace the suction tubing routinely, 4) failed to change the oxygen tubing weekly as ordered, 5) failed to change the humidifier bottle weekly as ordered, 6) failed to change the nebulizer tubing weekly as ordered. On 6/27/23 at approximately 2:00 PM, Surveyor C visited Resident #38 in his room. Resident #38 was able to communicate and when asked about the oxygen, the Resident was not able to recall the rate of oxygen flow ordered. Surveyor C noted the oxygen concentrator was set on 5 liters of oxygen. Further observations in the room revealed a suction…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA