Valley Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 150 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 154.6 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.64 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable environment for 1 of 3 units in the facilty. The findings included: During the initial tour of the facility on 12/9/25 several residents on the second floor complained of cold showers, which were fairly consistent for approximately two months. On 12/9/25 at 1:20 PM this surveyor interviewed resident #5. Resident #5 stated, Showers are sometimes cold and sometimes the water fluctuates, it'll be hot and then all of the sudden it goes really cold then it might get hot again. When asked if this was a recent or new issue they stated, No, it's been going on for a long time, a couple months probably. We just have to deal with it; we have to bathe.On 12/9/25 at 1:35 PM this surveyor interviewed resident #79. They stated, I enjoy showers but lately I've been getting bed baths because the water is too cold in the shower, I can't hardly stand that, and they give me good bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate minimum data set assessment for 4 of 35 residents, Resident #18, Resident #2, Resident #61, and Resident #69. The findings included:1. For Resident #18 the facility staff incorrectly coded high-risk medications on the minimum data set. Resident #18's clinical record included diagnoses which included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, and depression. Resident #18's most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 09/12/25 coded the resident as having both long- and short-term memory loss with severely impaired skills for daily decision making, in Section C, cognitive pattern. Section N, subsection N0415, High-Risk Drug Classes: Use and Indication, coded the resident as receiving hypnotic, anticoagulant, antibiotic, diuretic, opioid, antiplatelet, hypoglycemic, and anticonvulsant medications without indications for use. Resident #18's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to develop/implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for 4 of 35 residents, Resident #2, Resident #15, Resident #75, and Resident #13. The findings included:1. For Resident #2 the facility staff failed to develop and or implement a comprehensive person-centered activity care plan to address the resident's activity preferences, interests, and psychosocial needs. Resident #2's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, difficulty in walking, dementia, depression, anxiety disorder, macular degeneration-bilateral, and legal blindness. The most recent significant change MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/30/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 3 out of 15 for cognitive abilities indicating the resident was severely impaired in cognition. A review of an activity admission assessment dated [DATE] disclosed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide an ongoing, person-centered activity program to support resident choice, interests and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 of 35 sampled residents, Resident #2, Resident #15, Resident #75, and Resident #13. The findings included:1. For Resident #2, the facility staff failed to provide an ongoing, person-centered, activity program to support resident choice, interests, and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Resident #2's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, difficulty in walking, dementia, depression, anxiety disorder, macular degeneration-bilateral, and legal blindness. The most recent significant change MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/30/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 3 out of 15 for cognitive abilities indicating the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure the resident received the provider ordered amount of oxygen for 1 of 35 residents, Resident #61.Resident #61's Oxygen was observed to be set at 4 1/2 liters and 5 liters a minute. The provider order was for 2 liters a minute.Resident #61's clinical record included the diagnosis chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #61's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/26/25 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 7 out of a possible 15 points. Per the MDS manual a score of 7=severe impairment in cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #61's clinical record included a provider order for Oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula as tolerated every shift for COPD/hypoxia. Date of order 12/05/25. On 02/10/25 at 8:25 a.m., the surveyor observed Resident #61's Oxygen to be set at 4 1/2 liters a minute. Resident #61 stated it's usually at 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to use appropriate alternatives prior to the installation of side bed rails for 1 of 35 residents, Resident #2. The findings included: For Resident #2, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of appropriate alternatives prior to the installation of bilateral half-side rails. Resident #2's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, dementia, macular degeneration, legal blindness, restless leg syndrome, and history of falling. The most recent significant change minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/30/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 3 out of 15 for cognitive abilities indicating the resident was severely impaired in cognition. Section GG (Functional Abilities) coded the resident as being dependent on staff for the ability to roll from lying on back to left and right side and return to lying on back on the bed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 35 sampled residents was free of significant medication errors, Resident #2. The findings included:For Resident #2, the facility staff failed to hold the medication Humalog for blood glucose levels less than (120) one-hundred twenty, as ordered by a medical provider. Resident #2's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, hypertension, dementia, chronic kidney disease-stage 3, and muscle weakness. The most recent significant change minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/30/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 3 out of 15 for cognitive abilities indicating the resident was severely impaired in cognition. A review of a medical provider orders disclosed an order which read in part, .Humalog Solution 100 UNIT/ML (milliliters) (Insulin Lispro (Human)) Inject 2 unit subcutaneously (under the skin) before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure a safe and functional environment for 4 of 85 resident rooms. The findings included: On 12/9/25 during the initial tour of the facility this surveyor identified four resident rooms on the second floor with package terminal air conditioners (PTACs) that were pulled loose from the wall causing safety concern, or with outdoors visible through the units and cold air coming in through and around the units. room [ROOM NUMBER] the PTAC was noted to be hanging crooked and loose from the wall. room [ROOM NUMBER], the surveyor could see daylight through the PTAC unit. room [ROOM NUMBER], the surveyor could see outdoors around the unit and the wall was crumbling around the unit. On 12/9/25 at 2:40 PM this surveyor interviewed resident #3. They stated, This whole room needs painting. I took my watercolors and tried to paint it right here, but it doesn't look too good. I thought it would match the other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to safeguard resident private information on 1 of 4 units, 2 front. The findings included: Facility staff failed to close the narcotic book or the computer screen when leaving the medication cart unattended on the hallway. 06/28/23 8:35 a.m., the surveyor observed a medication pass and pour observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1. Upon approaching the medication cart the surveyor observed LPN #1 to walk away from their medication cart and enter a residents room. LPN #1 left the computer screen up and running and the narcotic book was observed to be open exposing resident information. A male visitor and several staff were observed to be in the vicinity of the medication cart. LPN #1 returned to their medication cart and prepared a residents medication for administration. After preparing the medication LPN #1 again left their computer screen and the narcotic book open. Walked away from the cart and entered a residents room to administer the medications. Upon returning to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to review and revise the residents Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) for 1 of 39 residents, Resident #145. The findings included: The facility staff failed to review and revise the residents CCP when they fell and fractured their left distal fibula. Resident #145's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of the left distal fibula, muscle weakness and difficulty in walking. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #145's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 06/06/23 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. Section G (functional status) was coded to indicate the resident required minimal assistance of one person for transfers. Walk in room/corridor was coded to indicate the resident required extensive assistance of one person. Resident #145 was coded as using a walker for mobility. 06/27/23 1:10 p.m., Resident #145 stated their leg had given out when they were trying…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA