Riverside Health & Rehab Cntr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 144 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 173.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.96 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.61 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.15 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, local ombudsman interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services to meet the needs of the residents for 2 of 35 current residents in the survey sample, Resident #112 and #114. The findings included: 1. For Resident #112, the facility staff failed to administer the physician ordered antibiotic medication, Cephalexin to treat cellulitis and failed to address the wound specialist's recommendations for lab testing related to concern for cellulitis. Resident #112's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Hypocalcemia, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Essential Hypertension, Bilateral Open-Angle Glaucoma, Polyosteoarthritis, and Major Depressive Disorder. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/26/23 assigned the resident a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 9 out of 15 indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #112's clinical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure medical provider orders were obtained/provided to address the urinary catheter needs of 1 of 35 current residents in the survey sample, Resident #145. The findings included: For Resident #145, the facility staff failed to obtain provider orders for an indwelling urinary catheter present on readmission. Resident #145's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, Dementia, Adult Failure to Thrive, and Unstageable Pressure Ulcer of the Right Buttocks. The most recent significant change minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/23/23 coded the resident as rarely/never understood and rarely never understanding others with short-term and long-term memory loss. Resident #145 was coded for the presence of an indwelling catheter. On 8/29/23 at approximately 3:15 PM, surveyor observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to ensure that a resident diagnosed with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services by monitoring targeted behaviors associated with the use of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 21 residents in the survey sample, Resident #75. The findings were: The facility staff failed to monitor behaviors for Resident #75 who had a dementia diagnosis. Resident #75's facesheet listed diagnoses which included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, dysphagia, epilepsy, stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer, dementia, adult failure to thrive, and bipolar disorder. The resident's minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 07/30/23 coded the resident's brief interview for mental status a 99 which indicated the resident was unable to complete the interview. The resident was coded to have both short and long-term memory problems and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. A provider order for Behaviors - monitor for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed the pharmacists recommendations for 3 of 35 current sampled residents, Resident #57, 75, and 128. The findings include: For resident #57, the facility staff failed to ensure the physician reviewed the pharmacists recommendations for the months of May 2023 and July 2023. #57's diagnoses included but was not limited to the following; dementia, anxiety, major depressive disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder and hypertension. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/26/23, assigned resident #57 a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The clinical record for resident #57 was reviewed 9/6/23. There was a Consultant Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review dated 5/31/23 that read in part, See report for any noted irregularities and/or recommendations. The surveyor was unable to locate the report in the clinical record.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 35 current residents in the survey sample, Resident #128. The findings included: For Resident #128, the facility staff failed to obtain a stop date for the antibiotic medication, Macrobid which resulted in the medication being administered for greater than four (4) weeks. Resident #128's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Rheumatoid Arthritis, Essential Hypertension, Major Depressive Disorder, Atrial Fibrillation, and History of Falling. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/17/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 14 out of 15 indicating Resident #128 was cognitively intact. Resident #128's order history included an order dated 5/22/23 for Macrobid 100 mg by mouth two times a day for cellulitis related urinary tract infection. The Macrobid order did not include a duration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-03-11 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
  Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to consistently document in the resident's clinical records that COVID-19 testing was offered, completed (as appropriate to the resident's testing status), and the results of each test for 26 residents. The findings included: The facility staff failed to consistently document that COVID-19 testing was offered to the residents of the facility and failed to document the results of each test in the resident's clinical records. During the record reviews, the survey team were unable to locate results of COVID-19 tests for negative residents. On 03/11/2021 at 1:45 p.m., the administrator, (DON) director of nursing, and (RNC) regional nurse consultant were interviewed regarding the missing COVID-19 testing results. The DON stated they printed off the facility census, identified if anyone was positive and that was marked on the census. They did not mark the negative test results on this census and only documented in the clinical record if the resident was positive. The DON stated they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-03-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and the review of documents, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop a base-line care plan to address indwelling urinary catheter needs at the time of admission for one (1) of 28 sampled residents (Resident #83). The findings include: The facility staff failed to develop a base-line care plan, within 48 hours of the resident's admission, to address Resident #83's indwelling urinary catheter. Resident #83 was admitted to the facility with an indwelling urinary catheter in place. Resident #83's minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/3/21 had the resident assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #83's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as 13 out of 15. Resident #83 was documented as requiring assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, and eating. Resident #83 was assessed as having an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident #83's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: cardiac dysrhythmias,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-03-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for dependent residents for 2 of 28 residents, Resident #49 and Resident #144. The findings included: 1. For Resident #49 the facility staff failed to provide assistance with oral care. Resident #49's face sheet listed diagnoses which included, but not limited to non-displaced fracture to body of scapula, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension, rheumatoid arthritis, atrial fibrillation and anemia. Resident #49's admission MDS (minimum data set), with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/09/21 assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. Section G, functional status, coded the resident as needing extensive assistance of one person physical assist in the area of personal hygiene. Personal hygiene is listed as combing hair, brushing teeth, shaving, applying make-up, and washing/drying face and hands. Resident #49's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and the review of documents, it was determined the facility staff failed to follow medical provider orders for treatment and/or care for two (2) of 28 sampled residents (Resident #65 and Resident #83). The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #83's blood glucose levels were monitored according to medical provider orders. Resident #83's minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/3/21 had the resident assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #83's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as 13 out of 15. Resident #83 was documented as requiring assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, and eating. Resident #83 was assessed as having an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident #83's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: cardiac dysrhythmias, heart failure, high blood pressure, hemiplegia/hemiparesis, respiratory failure, and urinary retention. Review of Resident #83's clinical record revealed an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and the review of documents, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure medical provider orders were obtained/provided to address the urinary catheter needs of one (1) of 28 sampled residents (Resident #83). The findings include: Facility staff members failed to ensure Resident #83's clinical record included medical provider orders for an indwelling urinary catheter and medical provider orders for the care of an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident #83's minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/3/21 had the resident assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #83's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as 13 out of 15. Resident #83 was documented as requiring assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, and eating. Resident #83 was assessed as having an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident #83's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: cardiac dysrhythmias, heart failure, high blood pressure,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA