No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lake Manassas Health & Rehabilitation Center

14935 Holly Knoll Lane, Gainesville, VA 20155 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (703) 743-3999 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2020Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$22,509 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2020
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $22,509 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-10)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8180 Stonewall Shops Sq · (703) 753-9799 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid1.6 mi
14610 Lee Hwy · (571) 248-6536 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Wegmans0.1 mi
8297 Stonewall Shops Square · (571) 222-2300 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.8%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.5%18.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.4%3.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.9%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.9%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.8%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.1%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.9%21.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.9%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine53.1%73.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.9%22.3%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.2%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.971.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.051.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 846 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
76.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.90U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.44hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.36hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 76.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 290 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.90 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.7%CMS range 61.8–68.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 9.6–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge76.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting91.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 5.2–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.091.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.86
RN hours/ resident / day
1.17
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.61
RN hoursweekends
58.1%
Total nursing turnover
43.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 117.1 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-04-17)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2022-07-14)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide care in a timely manner to prevent serious injury and/or death to two of 12 residents in the survey sample, Residents #1 and #2, resulting in the identification of immediate jeopardy.The findings include:1. For Resident #1 (R1), on [DATE], the facility staff failed to assess and accurately identify signs and symptoms of sepsis (1) and to transfer the resident to the hospital in a timely manner. The resident's significant change of condition was identified on [DATE] at 7:30 a.m., the resident was not transferred to the local hospital for treatment until approximately 12:30 p.m., and the resident died at the hospital at 3:37 p.m. from sepsis. The delay in treatment put the resident at high risk of serious injury or death.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included surgical repair of a hip fracture. On the admission MDS (minimum) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement an effective QAPI (Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement) process for one of one facility.The findings include:The facility failed to implement its QAPI plan following an incident in which a resident, who was displaying signs and symptoms of sepsis (1), was not transferred to the hospital in a timely manner.On 9/1/24 at 6:27 a.m., the weekend on-call licensed provider was contacted about the resident's low blood pressure (documented as 84/49). The on-call provider ordered a hold on the resident's aspirin and medications to treat high blood pressure, a test for blood in the resident's stool, and hourly blood pressure checks. On 9/1/24 at 7:30 a.m., R1's blood pressure was recorded as 80/41, he was unresponsive to verbal stimuli, and his oxygen saturation was 84% on room air. R1's neurological status of being unresponsive never changed throughout the day. The resident's PCP (primary care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide required documents at the time of discharge for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #2.The findings include:For Resident #2 (R2), the facility staff failed to provide a written notice of bed hold to the resident or Resident Representative (RR) and failed to provide continuity of clinical care documents to the receiving hospital on 2/28/26.A review of R2's clinical record revealed that she was discharged to the hospital on 2/28/26 at approximately 10:30 p.m.Further review of R2's clinical record failed to reveal evidence that the resident (or Resident Representative) was notified in writing of the reasons for the discharge and no evidence that the facility provided clinical documentation regarding the resident's care plan goals and other information to the receiving hospital.On 4/8/26 at 7:05 a.m., the [NAME] President of Operations stated there was no bed hold or continuity of clinical care information for R2 on 2/28/26.On 4/8/26 at 8:52 a.m., LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide physician supervision for one of 12 residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include:For Resident #1 (R1), the facility physician failed to provide adequate physician oversight and direction related to a significant change in condition on 9/1/24.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included surgical repair of a hip fracture. On the admission MDS (minimum) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/16/24, he was coded as having no cognitive impairment, having scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status). He was coded as having no concerns with making his needs known or communicating. A review of provider and nursing assessments revealed R1 was consistently alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. R1 had a provider's order that he was a full code. A review of R1's clinical record revealed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, physician interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide competent nursing staff for two of twelve residents in the survey sample, Residents #1 and #2.The findings include:1. For Resident #1 (R1), the facility nursing staff failed to demonstrate competence to recognize and respond to a significant change in condition, including signs and symptoms consistent with sepsis (1).R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included surgical repair of a hip fracture. On the admission MDS (minimum) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/16/24, he was coded as having no cognitive impairment, having scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status). He was coded as having no concerns with making his needs known or communicating. A review of provider and nursing assessments revealed R1 was consistently alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. R1 had a provider's order that he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, family interview, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide incontinence care in a timely manner for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident # 2. The findings include: For Resident #2 (R2), the facility staff failed to offer toileting or incontinence care for a period of three hours. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an annual assessment, with an assessment reference date of 12/16/24, the resident scored an 11 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. In Section GG - Functional Status, the resident was coded as requiring substantial/maximum assistance for toilet transfers. In Section H - Bladder and Bowel, the resident was coded as being frequently incontinent of both bowel and bladder. On 2/18/25 at 10:30 a.m., An interview was conducted with R2 and her family. R2 stated, I had taken a shower around 7:00 a.m. to 7:15 a.m. The resident stated,I had not been offered to go to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for one of five residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to obtain Vancomycin for administration, the resident missed six doses of the medication. The physician order dated, 2/26/24 at 9:55 a.m. documented, Vancomycin HCL (hydrochloride) (1) Oral Capsule 125 MG (milligrams); Give 1 capsule by mouth four times a day for c-diff (clostridium difficile)(2). The February 2024 MAR (medication administration record) documented the above order. On 2/26/24 at the 1:00 p.m. dose a 9 was documented. A 9 indicates Other/See progress note. On 2/26/24 for the 5:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. dose a 5 was documented. A 5 indicates Hold/See progress note. On 2/27/24 for the 9:00 a.m. dose, it was documented as having been administered. On 2/27/24 for the 1:00 p.m. dose, a 9 was documented. Review of the nurse's notes revealed the following: On 2/26/24 at 2:07…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide care and services, for one of 40 residents in the survey sample, receiving dialysis services, Resident #76. The findings include: For Resident #76, the facility staff failed to evidence the monitoring of the resident's dialysis access, an arterial - venous fistula. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment, with an assessment reference date of 3/30/2024, the resident scored a nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. In Section B - Hearing, Speech and Vision, the resident was coded as having highly impaired vision. In Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs, the resident was coded as receiving hemodialysis (1). The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Observation was made of Resident #76 on 4/16/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside without an assessment for self-administration for one of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident #25. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of3/29/24, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 indicating the resident is not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. Observation was made with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #4, on 4/16/2024 at 8:25 a.m. On the overbed table was a bottle of nasal saline spray and an albuterol inhaler. LPN #4 picked up the medications and stated they shouldn't be in the resident's room. When asked why the medications can't be in the resident's room, LPN #4 stated that the residents can't have medications in their room. If they see them in the room, they are to remove them. Review of the resident clinical record failed to evidence an assessment for the self-administration of medications. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician and/or resident representative of a change in condition for two of 40 residents in the survey sample; Residents #61 and #155. The findings include: 1. For Resident #61, the facility staff failed to notify the physician of an increase in daily weights per order; and when daily weights were not obtained per order. A review of the clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 3/20/24, documented, daily weight notify NP/MD (Nurse Practitioner / Medical Doctor) of more than 3 lbs (pounds) (of weight gain) in a day or 5lbs in a week for heart failure. A second physician's order, dated 3/20/24, documented, Fluid Restriction: 1500ml (milliliters) per day - Meals from kitchen = Breakfast 300ml; Lunch 420ml; Dinner 360ml. Nursing = Morning Meds 120ml; Afternoon Meds 120ml; Evening Meds 120ml; Night Shift 60ml. A third physician's order, dated 3/25/24, for Furosemide (1) Oral Tablet 20 MG (milligrams) Give 40 mg by mouth one time a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide evidence of required resident clinical information when a resident is transferred to the hospital, for three of 40 residents in the survey sample, Residents #72, #100 and #25. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to evidence provision of required resident information to a receiving facility at the time of discharge for Resident #72. Resident #72 was transferred to the hospital on 2/21/24. Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: PTSD, intestinal fistula, afib (atrial fibrillation) and CHF (congestive heart failure). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a Medicare 5-day assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/4/24, coded the resident as scoring a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence a bed hold notice was provided when one of 40 residents were transferred to the hospital, Resident #25. The findings include: The nurse's note dated, 3/17/2023 at 9:24 a.m. documented, Patient was unresponsive to verbal and tactile stimuli. Blood pressure was 91/61, O2 (oxygen) was 54% on 4 L (liters), temp (temperature) was 97, heart rate was 81, blood sugar was 288. Patient was transferred to hospital via EMS (emergency medical services) at 0830 (8:30 a.m.). Emergency contact notified as well as (name of nurse practitioner). Further review of the clinical record failed to evidence that a bed hold notice was sent with the resident to the hospital. A request was made for evidence that the bed hold notice was sent with the resident upon transfer and none was provided prior to exit. An interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #3 on 4/17/2024 at 9:40 a.m. When asked what documents she sends to the hospital with the resident upon transfer, RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident/staff interviews, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop/implement the care plan for three of 40 residents in the survey sample, Residents #72, #155 and #64. The findings include: 1.The facility staff failed to develop the comprehensive care plan for PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) for Resident #72. Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), intestinal fistula, afib (atrial fibrillation) and CHF (congestive heart failure). The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a Medicare 5-day assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/4/24, coded the resident as scoring a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of the MDS Section GG-functional status coded the resident as requiring maximal assistance for bathing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 40 residents in the survey sample; Resident #61. The findings include: 1. For Resident #61, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan to include obtaining weights as ordered by the physician for a resident on a diuretic and fluid restriction with specific orders for daily weights and reporting changes to the physician. A review of the clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 3/20/24, documented, daily weight notify NP/MD (Nurse Practitioner / Medical Doctor) of more than 3 lbs (pounds) (of weight gain) in a day or 5lbs in a week for heart failure. A second physician's order, dated 3/20/24, documented, Fluid Restriction: 1500ml (milliliters) per day - Meals from kitchen = Breakfast 300ml; Lunch 420ml; Dinner 360ml. Nursing = Morning Meds 120ml; Afternoon Meds 120ml; Evening Meds 120ml; Night Shift 60ml. A third physician's order, dated 3/25/24, for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. For Resident #156, the facility staff failed to administer a nasal spray and an iron supplement per the physician orders. A. The physician order dated,3/28/2024 documented, Ferretts Oral Tablet 325 MG (milligrams) (106 Fe [iron]) (Ferrous Fumarate) (used to treat anemia); Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for anemia. The April 2024 MAR (medication administration record) documented the above order. On the following dates for the 9:00 a.m. dose a 15 was documented: 4/2/2024 4/5/2024 4/5/2024 4/7/2024 4/8/2024 4/10/2024 A 15 indicated that No coverage was required. On 4/13/2024 through 4/16/2024, it was documented as administered. An interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #4 on 4/17/2024 at 1:10 p.m. The above order was reviewed with LPN #4. When asked why the medication had not given for all the days, LPN #4 stated the facility only had Ferrous Sulfate and it had to be ordered. (OSM - other staff member) #3, the central supply clerk had to order it and we had to wait for the shipment. An interview was conducted with OSM #3 on 4/17/2024 at 11:20 a.m. When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide showers in a timely manner for one of 40 residents in the survey sample, Resident #152. The findings include: For Resident #152, the facility staff failed to provide bathing for nine days after admission. On the MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment, with the ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/2/2023, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section G - Functional Status, the resident was coded as not having any baths during the lookback period. The ADL (activities of daily living) record for February 2023, documented on 2/28/2023, the day of admission, the bathing activity did not occur. The ADL record for March 2023, documented the showers were to be given on 3/2/2023 and on 3/6/2023. On both dates, it was documented that the activity did not occur. The first documented shower given to Resident #152 was on 3/9/2023, nine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement physician's orders for one of 40 residents in the survey sample; Resident #61. The findings include: 1. For Resident #61, the facility staff failed to implement physician's orders for (1) obtaining daily weights and (2) notify the nurse practitioner or physician of more than three pounds of weight gain in one day or five pounds in a week. A review of the clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 3/20/24, documented, daily weight notify NP/MD (Nurse Practitioner / Medical Doctor) of more than 3 lbs (pounds) (of weight gain) in a day or 5lbs in a week for heart failure. A second physician's order, dated 3/20/24, documented, Fluid Restriction: 1500ml (milliliters) per day - Meals from kitchen = Breakfast 300ml; Lunch 420ml; Dinner 360ml. Nursing = Morning Meds 120ml; Afternoon Meds 120ml; Evening Meds 120ml; Night Shift 60ml. A third physician's order, dated 3/25/24, for Furosemide (1) Oral Tablet 20 MG (milligrams) Give 40 mg by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to evidence documentation of current bed rail assessments and consents for three of 40 residents in the survey sample, Residents #4, #358 and #359. The findings include: 1. For Resident #4 (R4), the facility failed to evidence an assessment or consent for the use of bed rails. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment, with an assessment reference date of 3/25/2024, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating they were cognitively intact to make daily decisions. The resident was coded as requiring partial/moderate assistance with rolling left and right and not having any limitation in range of motion to the upper extremities. On 4/15/2024 at approximately 3:26 p.m., an observation was made of R4 in bed with bilateral bar shaped bed rails in place. At this time an interview was conducted with R4 who stated they used the bed rails…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure one of 40 residents in the survey sample were free of unnecessary medications, Resident #156. The findings include: For Resident #156, the facility staff failed to hold a blood pressure medication when the blood pressure was below the physician ordered parameters. The physician order dated 4/10/2024, documented, Metoprolol Succinate ER (extended release) Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 hours 50 MG (milligrams); Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for HTN (high blood pressure)/Sick Sinus Syndrome. Hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure) < (less than) 130 or HR (heart rate) < 60. The April 2024 MAR (medication administration record) documented the above order. On 4/13/2024 the blood pressure was documented as 120/58. The medication was documented as having been administered. On 4/14/2024 the blood pressure was documented as 102/66. The medication was documented as having been administered. An interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to have a written agreement for services provided for one of one resident receiving dialysis services, Resident #76. The findings include: The facility failed to have a written agreement with the dialysis center that was providing dialysis services to Resident #76. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, an admission assessment, with an assessment reference date of 3/30/2024, the resident scored a nine out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately impaired for making daily decisions. In Section B - Hearing, Speech and Vision, the resident was coded as having highly impaired vision. In Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs, the resident was coded as receiving hemodialysis (1). The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The physician order dated, 3/23/2024, documented, Hemodialysis (1) 3X/week (three times per week) MWF…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for two of 40 residents in the survey sample, Residents #10 and #155. The findings include: 1. For Resident #10, the facility staff failed to ensure a PASRR (preadmission screening and resident review) was dated and signed at the completion of the form. The clinical record was reviewed. A PASRR was scanned into the clinical record on 3/24/24. The form had no signature of person completing the form and no date of when the form was completed. An interview was conducted with OSM (other staff member) #4, the director of discharge planning and social services, on 4/17/2024 at approximately 9:15 a.m. The above noted PASARR was shown to OSM #4. When asked if a form, such as this, should be signed and dated, OSM #4 stated, yes it should be. She stated, it came from the hospital that way. OSM #4 was asked if this was an accurate clinical record, OSM #4 stated, no. Administrative staff member (ASM) #1, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain infection control practices during the medication administration observation. The findings include: Observation was made on 4/16/2024 at 8:25 a.m. of LPN (licensed practical nurse) #4 administering medications. LPN #4 popped a Furosemide (diuretic) 20 mg (milligrams) tablet out of the bubble pack. The tablet landed on the medication cart, not in the cup. LPN #4 proceeded to pick up the pill with her bare hands and placed it in the medication cup. LPN #4 proceeded to administer the medication to the resident. An interview was conducted with LPN #4 on 4/17/2024 at 8:20 a.m. The observation above was reviewed with LPN #4. When asked if that was the process when a pill drops on the medication cart, LPN #4 stated, no, she should have thrown it away and popped a new one. When asked why she should do that, LPN #4 stated it's unsanitary to touch a pill. The facility policy, Administration Procedures for all Medications did not address when a pill lands on the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-14 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan and/or provide a written summary of the baseline care plan for 4 of 47 residents in the survey sample, Residents #115, #138, #113 and #247. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for Resident #115 (R115) for pressure ulcers that were present on admission to the facility. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/23/2022 the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident is cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section M documented R115 having one Stage 3 pressure ulcer present upon admission to the facility and one unstageable-deep tissue injury present on admission to the facility. On 7/12/2022 at 2:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with R115 in their room. R115 stated that they had been in the facility for about a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide respiratory services for 4 of 47 residents in the survey sample, Residents #39, #8, #113 and #57. The findings include: 1. For Resident #39 (R39), the facility staff failed to administer oxygen at the physician prescribed rate and failed to store respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner. R39 has a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, the resident was coded as scoring a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section O - Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs, the resident was coded as using oxygen while a resident at the facility. Observation was made on 7/12/2022 at approximately 1:00 p.m. of R39 sitting up in their wheelchair. The resident had oxygen on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to evidence if a resident had or did not have an advance directive, or had a discussion with the resident and/or responsible party related to the resident's advance directive for two of 47 residents in the survey sample, Residents #14 and #29. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to evidence documentation that advance directive was discussed with Resident #14, the presence of an advance directive, or if the resident wished information regarding formulating an advance directive. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an assessment reference date of 4/13/2022, Resident #14 (R14) scored a 12 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident is moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. Part of the admission paperwork dated 5/20/2019, documented in part, (Initial of corporation) Policies Covering the Implementation of Self-Determination Rights. documented in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to resolve a grievance for 1 of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #57. Resident #57 (R57) and/or the resident's family reported missing clothes to the facility staff in June 2022. The facility staff failed to resolve this grievance. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/29/22, the resident scored 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. On 7/12/22 at 1:19 p.m., an interview was conducted with R57. R57 stated it was hard finding personal belongings when the resident returns from the hospital. R57 stated approximately one month ago, it was difficult locating personal belongings upon the resident's readmission from the hospital. R57 stated the resident returned to a different room and some belongings including new shirts and pants were missing. R57 stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide the required documentation to the receiving facility at the time of a transfer for one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #69 (R69). The findings include: The facility staff failed to evidence required documentation was provided for (R69) to the receiving facility for a facility-initiated transfer on 03/31/2022. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 05/24/2022, the resident scored 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The facility's progress noted for (R69) dated 03/31/2022 documented, Resident is alert and very confused with hallucinations. Sent out to ER (emergency room) for low H&H (hemoglobin (1) and hematocrit (2)) and AMS (altered mental status) . On 7/13/2022 at 2:39 p.m., an interview was conducted with LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide written notification to the resident and the resident's representative of a facility initiated transfer for 2 of 47 residents in the survey sample, Residents #69 (R69) and #138 (R138), and failed to notify the ombudsman of a facility-initiated transfer for 1 of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #138 (R138). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to evidence written notification was provided for (R69) and (R69's) responsible party for a facility-initiated transfer on 03/31/2022. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 05/24/2022, the resident scored 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The facility's progress noted for (R69) dated 03/31/2022 documented, Resident is alert and very confused with hallucinations. Sent out to ER (emergency room) for low…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide a bed hold policy to the resident or the resident's representative upon a transfer to the hospital for 2 of 47 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 69 (R69) and #127 (R127). The findings included: 1. For (R69), facility staff failed to provide a copy of the bed hold policy to the resident or resident representative at the time of transfer on 03/31/2022. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 05/24/2022, the resident scored 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The facility's progress noted for (R69) dated 03/31/2022 documented, Resident is alert and very confused with hallucinations. Sent out to ER (emergency room) for low H&H (hemoglobin (1) and hematocrit (2)) and AMS (altered mental status) .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to correctly code an admission MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #113 (R113). The findings include: Section N of the admission MDS with the ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/22/2022 coded R113 as receiving insulin injections during the assessment look back period, however there was no evidence of R113 receiving insulin. On the most recent MDS, an admission assessment with an ARD of 6/22/2022, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is cognitively intact for making daily decisions. The physician orders for R113 failed to evidence an order for insulin. The eMAR (electronic medication administration record) for R113 dated 6/1/2022-6/30/2022 failed to evidence insulin administration. On 7/13/2022 at 3:40 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN (registered nurse) #2, MDS coordinator. RN #2 stated that Section N of the MDS had a seven day look back period. RN #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Residents #115. The findings include: The facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #115 (R115) for pressure ulcers that were present on admission to the facility. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/23/2022 the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) assessment, indicating the resident is cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section M documented R115 having one Stage 3 pressure ulcer present upon admission to the facility and one unstageable-deep tissue injury present on admission to the facility. On 7/12/2022 at 2:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with R115 in their room. R115 stated that they had been in the facility for about a month. R115 stated that they had come to the facility for therapy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and/or revise the comprehensive care plan for 3 of 47 residents in the survey sample, Residents #113, #28 and #57. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to review and revise Resident #113's (R113) comprehensive care plan to include the use of a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure machine) and incentive spirometer. On the most recent MDS, an admission assessment with an ARD of 6/22/2022, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was cognitively intact for making daily decisions. Section O did not document R113 using a CPAP during the assessment period. On 7/12/2022 at 2:14 p.m., an interview was conducted with R113 in their room. A CPAP machine was observed on the nightstand to the right of the residents bed with a mask lying on top of the machine uncovered. When asked about the CPAP machine and mask, R113 stated that they wore the mask at night…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #300. The facility staff failed to offer and provide bathing/showers to Resident #300 (R300) on multiple dates in November 2021 and December 2021. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/28/21, the resident scored 10 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. Section G coded R300 as being totally dependent on one staff with bathing. A review of R300's ADL records for the resident's stay from 11/22/21 through 12/22/21 only revealed documentation that the resident received bathing/shower on four days (11/30/21, 12/3/21, 12/10/21 and 12/17/21), per coding related to the legend on the ADL records (the legend coding documented): 1- Task…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and during a complaint investigation, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure one of 47 residents in the survey sample received dialysis services per the plan of care, (Resident #199). The findings include: Resident #199 (R199) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: end stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis and depression. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), around the time of the complaint, an annual assessment, with an assessment reference date of 1/5/2021, the resident was coded as scoring a 15 out of 15, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section D - Mood, the resident was coded as having little or no interest of doing things several days during the look back period and feeling down and depressed several days during the look back period. In Section O - Special Treatment, Procedures and Programs, R199 was coded as having dialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to act upon a pharmacy recommendation for one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #75. The facility staff failed to act upon Resident #75's (R75) February 2022 pharmacy recommendation for thyroid and lipid levels. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), an annual assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/31/22, R75 scored 13 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident is not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. A review of a consultant pharmacist recommendation to physician with a medication regimen review date of 2/27/22 documented a recommendation to add thyroid and lipid levels to R75's routine labs due to R75's use of thyroid and cholesterol medications. The physician/prescriber's response section of the form was blank. Further review of R75's clinical record failed from February 2022 through July 2022 failed to reveal documentation that the facility staff acted upon the above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 47 residents in the survey sample, Resident #28 (R28). The findings include: The facility staff failed to document in the clinical record fall interventions that were discussed in the at risk management meeting after two falls for R28. R28 had diagnoses that included but were not limited to: absence of left foot, absence of toes on right leg, and peripheral vascular disease. On the most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a significant change assessment, with an assessment reference date of 5/7/2022, the resident scored a 10 out of 15 o the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. In Section G - Functional Status, the resident was coded as extensive assistance of one person for moving in the bed, transfers, walking in the room, and toileting. In Section J - Health Conditions R28 was coded as having had two or more falls during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide education prior to administering the influenza immunization for one of 5 resident immunization reviews, Resident #55. The facility staff failed to provide education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza immunization prior to administering the immunization to Resident #55 (R55) on 11/19/21. The findings include: On the most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 5/27/22, the resident scored 14 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status), indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired for making daily decisions. A review of R55's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 11/19/21 for the influenza immunization. A review of R55's immunization record revealed the resident received the immunization on 11/19/21. Further review of R55's clinical record failed to reveal documentation that education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined facility staff failed to provide respiratory services consistent with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for six of 49 residents in the survey sample, Residents #322, #321, #118, #221, #47 and #72. The nebulizer masks for Residents #322, #321, Resident #118 and Resident #47 were observed uncovered on top of the residents' nebulizer machines or over the bed tables; and the incentive spirometer for Resident #321 and 221, were observed uncovered on the resident night stand and over bed table. Resident #72 was observed receiving oxygen at 3 LPM (liter per minute) instead of the 2 LPM ordered by the physician. The findings include: 1. Resident #322 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2), atrial fibrillation (3) and legal blindness. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to serve food in a sanitary manner on one of four nursing units, the 400 unit. The facility staff failed to handle plates without putting thumbs on the food contact, surface area of the plate and the facility staff failed to cover facial hair during tray line service. The findings include: On 2/25/20 at 11:50 AM, the dining observation was made on the 400-unit dining room. OSM #3 (Other Staff Member) a dining associate, was in the unit dining room small kitchen area, plating food from the steam table for the residents. She was noted to be wearing gloves but was handling serving spoon handles, meal tickets, the surface of the steam table, and other items. She was observed handling plates with her thumb on top side of the rim, which was part of the food contact, surface area, with the same gloves on that she, had worn while touching multiple other items. OSM #3 was also observed picking up rolls with her hand and placing them on the plates, wearing the same gloves, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined, that the facility staff failed to implement infection control procedures to prevent infection for five of 49 residents in the survey sample, Residents #322, #321, #118, #221 and #47. The facility staff failed to implement infection control procedures for the storage of nebulizer masks when not in use for Residents #322, #321, Resident #118 and Resident #47 and failed to implement infection control procedures for the storage of Resident #321 and 221's incentive spirometers when not in use. The findings include: 1. Resident #322 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2), atrial fibrillation (3) and legal blindness. Resident #322's most recent MDS (minimum data set), was not due at the time of the survey. The facility's nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] coded Resident #322 as being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure one of 49 sampled residents, (Resident #275) needs for the use of a call bell were accommodated. The facility staff failed to place Resident #275's call bell within reach during observations on 2/25/2020 and 2/26/2020. The findings include: Resident #275 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to pneumonia and difficulty swallowing. He had not been a resident of the facility long enough for an MDS (minimum data set) assessment to be completed. On the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], he was documented as being oriented only to person. He was documented as moving all of his extremities well. On the following dates and times, Resident #275's call bell was observed looped around the left grab bar and hanging down near the floor, out of the resident's reach: 2/25/20 20 at 2:21 p.m. and 2/26/2020 at 8:36 a.m. On 2/26/20 at 8:36 a.m., Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, facility document review, and review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that one of 49 residents, Resident #7, was free from sexual abuse and coercion by another resident. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #7 was free from inappropriate touching and coercion by Resident #21 on 11/26/19. The findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; diagnoses include but are not limited to dementia with behaviors, high blood pressure, psychosis, anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder, depression, and diabetes. The annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/4/19 coded the resident as being severely impaired in ability to make daily life decisions. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; diagnoses include but are not limited to diabetes, depression, hernia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the baseline care plan for one of 49 residents in the survey sample, Resident #275. The facility staff failed to implement Resident #275's care plan to place the call bell within reach. During observations conducted on 2/25/2020 and 2/26/2020, Resident #275's call bell was looped around the left grab bar and hanging down near the floor, out of the resident's reach. The findings include: Resident #275 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to pneumonia and difficulty swallowing. He had not been a resident of the facility long enough for an MDS (minimum data set) to be completed. On the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], he was documented as being oriented only to person. He was documented as moving all of his extremities well. A review of Resident #275's care plan dated 2/23/2020 revealed, in part: Be sure the resident's call light is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one of 49 residents in the survey sample, Residents # 72. The staff failed to implement Resident #72's comprehensive care plan to administer oxygen as ordered by the physician. The findings include: Resident # 72 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to: multiple sclerosis [1] and high blood pressure. Resident # 72's most recent MDS (minimum data set), a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 01/18/2020, coded Resident # 72 as scoring a 15 on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 15- being cognitively intact for making daily decisions. In Section O Special Treatment, Procedures and Programs, coded Resident # 72 was coded as receiving oxygen. The comprehensive care plan for Resident # 72 with a revision date of 10/15/2019 documented in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide care and services to maintain hydration status for one of 49 residents in the survey sample, Resident #275. The facility staff failed to offer fluids to or place fluids within Resident #275's reach during observations on 2/25/2020 and 2/26/2020. The findings include: Resident #275 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; diagnoses include, but are not limited to pneumonia and difficulty swallowing. He had not been a resident of the facility long enough for an MDS (minimum data set) assessment to be completed. On the admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], he was documented as being oriented only to person. He was documented as moving all of his extremities well. The admission assessment contained no documentation of his needing assistance while eating/drinking. On 2/25/2020 at 2:21 p.m., Resident #275 was observed sitting up slightly in his bed. His lips and mouth appeared dry. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined facility staff failed to provide a complete dialysis (1) communication plan for one of 49 residents in the survey sample, Resident #113. The facility staff failed to ensure the dialysis communication book fro Resident #113 was completed to ensure ongoing communication with the dialyisis center. The finding include: Resident #113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2), atrial fibrillation (3), and dependence on renal (kidney) dialysis. Resident #113's most recent MDS (minimum data set), an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/3/2020, coded Resident #113 as scoring a 1 (one) on the staff assessment for mental status (BIMS) of a score of 0 - 15, 1- being severely impaired for making daily decisions. Section O of the assessment documented Resident #113…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to obtain a psychiatric per a physician's order after a resident to resident incident for one of 49 residents in the survey sample, Resident #21. Resident #21 was the aggressor in a resident-to-resident incident of inappropriate touching of another resident, Resident #7 on 11/26/19. The physician ordered a psychiatric consult for Resident #21, and the facility staff failed to obtain the consult as ordered. The findings include: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of but not limited to diabetes, depression, hernia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, and high blood pressure. The quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/22/19 coded the resident as being mildly impaired in ability to make daily life decisions. The resident was coded as requiring total care for bathing; extensive care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2020-02-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain the dumpster in a sanitary manner to prevent pests. During the kitchen observation on 2/25/2020, the dumpster was observed with multiple overturned boxes of trash and multiple trash bags lying on the ground outside the confines of the dumpster. The findings include: On 2/25/2020 at 11:30 a.m., OSM (other staff member) #4, the dietary manager, accompanied the surveyor on an observation of the facility dumpster. There were several pieces of paper trash on the ground around and in front of the dumpster. On the backside of the dumpster, there were multiple overturned boxes of trash and multiple trash bags lying on the ground outside the confines of the dumpster. The trash had a sour smell. OSM #4 was asked if the trash behind the dumpster should be there. OSM #4 stated, Of course not. All these materials should be in the dumpster, not behind it. He stated when the dumpster is especially full, trash spills out behind the dumpster onto the ground when the compactor company personnel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$22,509 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $22,509 — penalty dated 2026-04-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 2 of 51.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 63 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5APPOMATTOX HEALTH & REHABILITATiON CENTERAppomattox, VA 1 of 5Alamance Health Care CenterBurlington, NC 1 of 5Bayside Health & Rehabilitation CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Cabarrus Health and Rehabilitation CenterConcord, NC 1 of 5Charlotte Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlotte, NC 1 of 5Chesapeake Health And Rehabilitation CenterChesapeake, VA 1 of 5Colonial Heights Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterColonial Heights, VA 1 of 5Elkton Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterElkton, MD 1 of 5Greenville Health and Rehabilitation CenterGreenville, NC 1 of 5Guilford Health Care CenterGreensboro, NC 1 of 5Harrisonburg Hlth & Rehab CntrHarrisonburg, VA 1 of 5Largo Nursing And Rehabiliation CenterGlenarden, MD 1 of 5Layhill Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterSilver Spring, MD 1 of 5Lenoir Health and Rehabilitation CenterLenoir, NC 1 of 5Lynchburg Health & Rehabilitation CenterLynchburg, VA 1 of 5Norfolk Health Care CenterNorfolk, VA 1 of 5Oxford Health and Rehabilitation CenterOxford, NC 1 of 5Parham Health Care & Rehab CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Salem Health & RehabilitationSalem, VA 1 of 5University Health and Rehabilitation CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Virginia Beach Healthcare And Rehab CenterVirginia Beach, VA 1 of 5Westport Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5White Oak Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterHyattsville, MD 1 of 5Williamsport Health And Rehabilitation CenterWilliamsport, MD 2 of 5Adelphi Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterAdelphi, MD 2 of 5Albemarle Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Beaufont Health And Rehabilitation CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Belaire Health Care CenterGastonia, NC 2 of 5Charlottesville Health & Rehabilitation CenterCharlottesville, VA 2 of 5Cherrydale Health & Rehabilitation CenterArlington, VA 2 of 5Culpeper Health & Rehabilitation CenterCulpeper, VA 2 of 5Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing CenterFairfax, VA 2 of 5Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Hanover Health And Rehabilitation CenterMechanicsville, VA 2 of 5Lexington Health Care CenterLexington, NC 2 of 5Litchford Falls Health and Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 2 of 5Pike Creek Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, DE 2 of 5Regency Health And Rehabilitation CenterYorktown, VA 2 of 5Shady Grove Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5The Nursing And Rehab Center At Stadium PlaceBaltimore, MD

Showing 40 of 63; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LAK MANASSAS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/28/2021
CHARLES 1994 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
CHESAPEAKE EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
EDWARD 1998 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
EK 2005 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
FAY 2014 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
FAY 2014 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
LL 2013 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MMS 2008 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
MZR EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SAUL 2012 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SILVERSTONE EAST LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SOL 2000 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
SOL 2000 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 & FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
STEVENS 3920 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/28/2021
GREENE, BEVERLYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/12/2023
RYLBSS EAST MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/28/2021

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$24.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.2M
Related-party expense29% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 31%Medicare 38%Other / private 31%

This home reported $6.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$508per resident / day
operating cost
$15,440per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$578per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495424. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next