Raleigh Court Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 140 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.485 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2020-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 28 residents (Resident #99) was free of accident hazards as evidenced by failure to ensure the resident was transferred with the correct size sling when using the mechanical lift, which resulted in resident injury. The findings included: Resident #99 was transferred with the incorrect sling when being transferred with the Hoyer lift. This resulted in the sling breaking and the resident fell to the floor. Resident #99 was evaluated at a local hospital and was diagnosed with a closed reduction (dislocation) left shoulder. This was a closed record review due to an FRI (facility reported incident) that was reported to the OLC (Office of Licensure and Certification). The face sheet in the EHR (electronic health record) included the diagnoses cerebral infarction, essential (primary) hypertension, and morbid (severe) obesity. Section C (cognitive patterns) of the resident's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 05/12/2019…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, facility staff failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The findings were: Facility staff stacked food storage containers one on top of each other after being washed and remained wet. Facility staff left the ice scoop inside the ice machine. On 08/11/24 at 1:15 p.m. during the initial tour of the kitchen, three (3) stacks of food storage containers were observed wet. A dietary aide who accompanied the surveyor during the tour acknowledged the containers had been washed and stacked, one on top of the other, to dry. The dietary aide unstacked the containers to dry separately. The ice scoop was observed inside the ice machine. The dietary aide removed the scoop, placed it in the holder attached to the wall beside the ice machine and stated, They know not to do that. On 08/14/24 at 4:32 p.m. during an end of day meeting with the assistant administrator, administrator, regional director of clinical services, assistant director of nursing, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, facility staff failed to notify the resident representative of a change in condition requiring transfer for 1 of 4 closed records reviewed for the survey (Resident #113) The findings were: The facility staff failed to notify Resident #113's resident representative of the resident's change in condition. The resident was unresponsive and required a transfer to an acute care hospital. The minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 06/15/2023 assigned Resident #113 a brief interview for mental status score a 15 out of 15. The admission record listed the resident was his own responsible party and a family member as the emergency contact #1. The clinical record contained a licensed practical nurse (LPN) change of condition progress note dated 07/11/23 at 9:09 p.m. which read, pt. (patient) notice [sic] to be unresponsive to voice by writer, who attempted sternal rub with no response. vs (vital signs) 101/69 97.8 temp, 106 bpm (beats per minute), and 94% O2 (oximeter). md (medical doctor) was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan which addressed hypotension for one (1) of 23 sampled current residents (Resident #74). The findings include: Review of Resident #74's comprehensive care plan, on the morning of 8/14/24, fail to reveal evidence the resident was care planned to address low blood pressure (hypotension). Resident #74's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/9/24, was signed as completed on 5/16/24. Resident #74 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #74's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as an eight (8) out of 15; this indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #74's clinical record included a medical provider order for midodrine 5 mg tablet dated 6/24/24. This order indicated the resident was to receive one (1) tablet two times a day for low blood pressure. This order indicated the medication should not be administered if the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, facility staff failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for 2 of 23 current residents in the survey sample (Resident #107 and #62). The findings were: 1. For Resident #107, the facility staff failed to maintain the resident's cigarettes and lighters. The most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 07/17/24 assigned Resident # 107 a brief interview for mental status score a 10 out of 15. The care plan included a focus area which read the resident was a smoker, the goal read the resident will smoke safely. For interventions, the care plan read educate on facility smoking policy, OT referral as needed, smoking apron, smoking assessment as needed. During the initial tour on 08/11/24 at 3:10 p.m., Resident #107 was lying in bed with the overbed table beside the bed. The surveyor observed one (1) pack of cigarettes and two (2) blue lighters on the overbed table. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one (1) of 23 sampled current residents was free from unnecessary medications (Resident #74). The findings include: The facility staff failed to hold Resident #74's midodrine according to the medical provider's ordered parameters. Midodrine is a medication used to treat low blood pressure (hypotension). Midodrine works by constricting blood vessels to increase an individual's blood pressure. Resident #74's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/9/24, was signed as completed on 5/16/24. Resident #74 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #74's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as an eight (8) out of 15; this indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #74's clinical record included a medical provider order for midodrine 5 mg tablet dated 6/24/24. This order indicated the resident was to receive one (1) tablet two (2) times a day for low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 23 sampled residents, Resident #105. The findings included: For Resident #105, the facility staff failed to follow provider orders for the administration of the medication, Cephalexin four times a day for two days as indicated. Cephalexin is indicated for the treatment of patients with certain infections caused by bacteria such as urinary tract infections. Resident #105's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to, Traumatic Subdural Hematoma, Muscle Weakness, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Delirium, End Stage Renal Disease, and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. Resident #105's most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference (ARD) of 6/13/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 12 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident is moderately cognitively impaired. A provider's order dated 6/7/24, read in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, family report, and ombudsman interview, facility staff failed to treat the resident with dignity and respect as evidenced by failure to answer calls for assistance within an hour for 1 of 6 residents in the survey sample (Resident #1). Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, hypotension, vascular dementia, peripheral vascular disease, osteomyelitis, cognitive communication deficit, and primary and secondary malignant neoplasms. On the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, the resident scored 15/15 on the Brief Interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. During an interview on 5/21/2024, the ombudsman reported investigating a family concern about call bells dating from 2/9 through 2/11/2024. The ombudsman stated that 2 of the 169 calls from the resident's room over that period were answered after more than an hour. This statement was corroborated by the family report dated 5/9/2024 stating that the resident waited over 1 hour during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to administer a medication for managing blood pressure (BP) as ordered by the physician/surrogate for 1 of 6 residents in the survey sample (Resident #1). Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, hypotension, vascular dementia, peripheral vascular disease, osteomyelitis, cognitive communication deficit, and primary and secondary malignant neoplasms. On the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, the resident scored 15/15 on the Brief Interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. The surveyor obtained the Medication Administration Audit report for 2/10/2024. The report indicated the resident's Midodrine HCl oral tablet 5 mg give 1 tablet three times a day for hypotension, hold for BP above 140/90 scheduled for 9 AM was administered to the resident at 11:07 AM. The administrator and corporate clinical consultant were notified of the concern during a summary meeting on 5/22/2024.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0776 — isolated
  Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to obtain a radiological test ordered by the physician/surrogate for 1 of 6 residents in the survey sample (Resident #1). Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, hypotension, vascular dementia, peripheral vascular disease, osteomyelitis, cognitive communication deficit, and primary and secondary malignant neoplasms. On the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, the resident scored 15/15 on the Brief Interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. The surveyor interviewed the nurse practitioner (NP) on 5/21/2024. The NP reported having entered the order for the Computed tomography (CT) scan and stated the scheduler confirmed the order had been entered. Record review revealed the NP entered an order for a CT of the abdomen on 11/10/2023. During that interview, the administrator stated that the scheduler was no longer working for the facility due to issues with record-keeping, among others.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for 1 of 6 residents, Resident #2. The findings included: For Resident #2 the facility staff failed to include an order for oxygen on the physician's order summary and failed to correctly document a physician's order in the nurse's progress notes. Resident #2's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified systolic (congestive) heart failure, and major depressive disorder. Resident #2's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 08/22/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 11 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicated that the resident was cognitively intact. Section O, Special Treatment, Procedures and Programs coded the resident as receiving oxygen therapy while both a resident of the facility and not a resident of the facility. Resident #2's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA