Franklin Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 238 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 126 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as is possible for (1) one of (3) three current sampled residents, Resident #1, resulting in harm. While operating a motorized wheelchair in the facility parking lot on 4/03/26, Resident #1 struck a curb which caused the motorized wheelchair to tilt resulting in Resident #1 falling from the motorized wheelchair. Resident #1 sustained bilateral subdural hematomas, first/second cervical vertebral fractures, a scalp laceration, multiple abrasions, and a hematoma of the scalp resulting in transfer to a higher level of care and surgical intervention. The findings included: Resident #1's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, unspecified hearing loss - bilateral, spinal stenosis, osteoarthritis, spondylosis, anxiety disorder, weakness, depression, nondisplaced fracture of first cervical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, facility staff failed to ensure the privacy and confidentiality of medical information in oral communication for 1 of 30 current residents in the survey sample, Resident #51. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease and renal failure. On the Minimum Data Set assessment with Assessment Reference Date 7/12/23, the resident scored 10/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. The resident was unaware that staff were shouting details about the resident's clinical condition in the hall. On 9/19/23 at 9:20 AM, CNA#5 yelled down the hall to LPN #1 you got any Foleys on that hall? LPN #1 replied there's no one named Foley on this hall. CNA #5 then yelled Foley catheters. LPN #1 replied [Resident #1 name] has a Foley. CNA #5 then yelled down the other hall [nurse name] you got any Foley on that hall? The nurse replied that she didn't know and would have to let her know later. F-583 guidance states that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accurately code a minimum data set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 3 closed records reviewed, Resident #112. The findings were: The facility staff failed to code Resident #112's discharge status to an assisted living facility (ALF). The discharge MDS coded the resident as discharged to an acute hospital when Resident #112 was discharged to an ALF. Resident #112's admission record listed diagnoses to include but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side, cognitive communication deficit, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Section A (Identification Information) of the most recent MDS, with an assessment reference date of 08/30/23, coded the resident's discharge status as being discharged to an acute hospital. During a review of Resident #112's clinical record, a licensed practical nurse (LPN) progress note written on 08/30/23 at 1:52 p.m. read the resident was discharged the same day via wheelchair in stable condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. For Resident #96, the facility staff failed to ensure fall prevention and safety measures were in place per the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan. Resident #96's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Cirrhosis of the Liver. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/05/23 coded the resident as moderately impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making with short-term memory problems. Resident #96 was coded as requiring extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, eating, toileting, personal hygiene and being totally dependent on staff for transfers. Resident #96's most recent Fall Risk Scoring Tool dated 9/11/23 scored the resident as being at high risk for falls. Resident #96's current comprehensive person-centered care plan documented the resident as being at risk for falls related to weakness, impaired range of motion, recent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible as evidenced by the presence of unsecured oxygen cylinders located in 2 of 30 resident rooms in the survey sample, Resident #267 and #271. The findings included: 1. For Resident #267, the facility staff failed to secure an oxygen cylinder located beside the resident's bed. Resident #267's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Osteomyelitis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, and Schizophrenia. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/07/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 13 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. On 9/18/23 at 8:02 PM, surveyor entered Resident #267's room and observed an unsecured oxygen cylinder located at the head of the bed on the left. Resident #267 was sitting in a wheelchair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident #40. The findings included: For Resident #40, the facility staff failed to turn on the oxygen cylinder to deliver oxygen support. Resident #40's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, and Bipolar Disorder. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/05/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #40's current comprehensive person-centered care plan included a focus area stating the resident was at risk for respiratory complications secondary to wheezing, cough, shortness of breath, and allergies with interventions including in part, to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review and during a medication pass and pour observation, the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 %. There were three errors in 36 opportunities for a medication error rate of 8.3%. These errors affected Resident # 40. The findings included: For resident # 40 the facility staff failed to administer a lidocaine pain patch and lidocaine cream as ordered. Resident # 40's demographic sheet lists diagnoses including but not limited to, multiple sclerosis, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, unspecified polyneuropathy, low back pain and spinal stenosis. Resident # 40's care plan has a problem statement for pain with an intervention reading, administer medications per order. On 9/19/23 at 9:35 AM this surveyor conducted a medication pass and pour observation on Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 1. LPN # 1 administered by mouth medications and fluticasone nasal spray, one spray each nostril, to resident # 40. Surveyor did not observe LPN # 1 apply any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were secure and stored in locked compartments for 1 of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident #264. The findings included: For Resident #264, the facility staff failed to ensure a bottle of Tylenol Arthritis 650 mg was secure and stored in a locked compartment. The bottle of Tylenol Arthritis was located on the resident's bedside table. Resident #264's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Failure, and Osteoarthritis. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/14/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 12 out of 15 indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. On 9/18/23 at approximately 8:15 PM, surveyor observed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs of the resident for 1 of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident #267. The findings included: For Resident #267, the facility staff failed to obtain lab tests as ordered by the physician on 9/06/23. Resident #267's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Osteomyelitis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, and Schizophrenia. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/07/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 13 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #267's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 9/01/23 for a CBC (complete blood count), CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel), ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), and CRP (c-reactive protein) on 9/06/23 and then weekly. Surveyor was unable to locate evidence of the lab tests being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for 1 of 30 residents in the survey sample, Resident #264. The findings included: For Resident #264, the facility staff failed to document treatment provided to a diabetic ulcer to the left great toe. Resident #264's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Failure, and Osteoarthritis. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/14/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 12 out of 15 indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #264 was coded for the presence of a diabetic foot ulcer. Resident #264's current comprehensive person-centered care plan included the focus area of a diabetic ulcer to the left great toe with interventions including treatment per treatment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention program for preventing and controlling infection and communicable diseases during an identified outbreak of COVID-19 on 1 of 2 nursing units, Unit 2. Facility staff failed to follow facility policy and procedure and CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidance related to source control mask use during a COVID-19 outbreak. At the time of the survey on 9/21/23, there was a current facility total of 40 COVID-19 positive residents and 27 COVID-19 positive staff members. Unit 2 had a total of 18 COVID-19 positive residents. The findings included: On 9/20/23 at 2:05 PM, surveyor observed registered nurse (RN) #4 in Resident #22's room on Unit 2 without wearing a mask while speaking with the resident. Resident #22's room was not identified as requiring COVID-19 precautions and the resident was not identified as COVID-19 positive at the time of observation. The observation was also witnessed by the facility staff development coordinator (SDC) who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to LIFEWORKS REHAB — 64 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

17 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA