No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Belmont Terrace

560 Lebo Boulevard, Bremerton, WA 98310 · For profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (360) 479-1515 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (360) 479-1515 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (78) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2701 Clare Ave · (360) 377-3951 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.9 mi
3333 Wheaton Way · (360) 782-0907 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
702 Lebo Blvd · (360) 207-1819 · Call to confirm hours
Park
550 Lebo Blvd · (360) 479-1833 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.5%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.7%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.4%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.5%17.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.1%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.1%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.2%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.6%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.2%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.9%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.9%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.9%13.4%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.141.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.671.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 203 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
79.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.29hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 79.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.3%CMS range 40.0–55.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.4–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge79.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge75.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.5%CMS range 3.1–8.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.88
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.63
RN hoursweekends
42.5%
Total nursing turnover
41.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 69.2 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-02)
32
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

78 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 68 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN: a notification that provides an estimated cost of continuing services which may no longer be covered by Medicare. Beneficiaries may choose to continue the services but may be financially liable) were provided, as required, for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 18 & 56) reviewed for provision of SNF ABN. This failure placed residents at risk of not having adequate information to make care and financial decisions during their continued stay.Findings included . Resident 56Record review showed Resident 56's Medicare Part A stay started on 11/07/2025 and had a last covered day of 01/21/2026. Resident 56 remained in the facility after the services ended. No SNF ABN was found in Resident 56's record. On 02/26/2026 at 4:13 PM, when asked if a SNF ABN was provided to Resident 56 Staff P, Social Services Director (SSD), stated, No. Resident 18Record review showed Resident 18's Medicare Part A stay started on 12/24/2025 and had a last covered day of 01/29/2026.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment regarding noise levels for 1 of 4 halls (Mountain View Hall) reviewed for a homelike environment. The failure to ensure appropriate noise levels placed residents at risk for not having a homelike environment, a decreased quality of life, and potential health concerns. Findings included .On 02/23/2026 at 10:33 AM, Resident 30 said the kitchen door was always slamming and the kitchen staff were very loud and she could hear the conversation from across the hall. Resident 30 said the facility was always telling us this is our home, but this does not feel like my home, because there would not be all the yelling and slamming of the doors in my home. Resident 30 said there was a resident on the hall that yelled all day and all night long and staff could not stop them. Resident 30 said they would keep the door shut due to the noise level. Resident 30 said they had written grievances and brought the concern to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer a bed hold upon transfer to the hospital for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 7 ), and to communicate required/necessary information to the receiving hospital to ensure continuity of care for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 7 & 80) and 4 of 4 discharges reviewed for hospitalization. Failure to offer bed holds placed residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed of their right to, and the cost of holding the resident's bed while hospitalized . The failure to ensure necessary information was communicated to the receiving hospital detracted from continuity of care and placed residents at risk of receiving incoherent, fragmented, or redundant care.Findings included.BED HOLDResident 7Review of the 01/20/2026 Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 7 was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE] with their return anticipated. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed there was no documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality of care was provided for insulin administration for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 44), bowel management for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 36 & 85), physical therapy evaluation for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 23) reviewed to Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), oxygen administration for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 85) and edema and weight monitoring for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 80). These failures placed residents at risk of medical complications, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 44 Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 12/17/2025, documented Resident 44 was cognitively intact. On 02/23/2026 at 11:15 AM, Resident 44 said they had missed 3 days of their insulin, due to the facility not having it in supply. Review of Resident 44's February 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing programs were provided at the frequency residents were assessed to require, for 6 of 7 residents (Resident 15, 26, 30, 32, 9 & 24) reviewed for restorative services. This failure placed residents at risk for decline in functional mobility, range of motion (ROM), contracture (a permanent tightening or shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, or other tissues that causes joints to become stiff) formation and diminished quality of life.Findings included . Resident 15 Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A restorative nursing program care plan, initiated 08/15/2024, showed the resident had the following restorative program(s): Restorative walking program with front wheeled walker for 15 minutes as tolerated, up to three times per week. Active ROM program to bilateral upper and lower extremities using the Omni cycle for 15 minutes as tolerated, up to three times per week. Review of the restorative documentation from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to provide and supervise care as evidenced by information provided by 6 resident interviews (Resident 30, 44, 23, 3, 13 & 66), Staff interviews (Staff Q & T) and Resident Council interviews. Additionally, the aid from the Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) was removed from restorative duties to cover direct care staff absences and resident transportation resulting in the RNPs not being completed for residents. The shower aides were also removed from assigned duties to cover direct care staff shortages. The facility had insufficient staff to ensure residents received assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) including showers, restorative services, dining services and basic resident care. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, negative outcomes and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .On 02/23/2026 at 10:52 AM, Resident 30 said their shower days were changed without notice by Staff B, Director of Nursing Services (DNS) and they were never informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-02 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to routinely complete Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) annual performance reviews as required for 3 of 5 sampled nursing assistants (Staff I, J, & K) reviewed for performance reviews. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or under-qualified care staff, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Staff I, CNA, was hired 12/27/2024. Staff I had no annual performance review completed from 12/2024-12/2025. Staff J, CNA, was hired 08/07/2024. Staff J had no annual performance review completed from 08/2024-08/2025. Staff K, CNA, was hired 07/29/2024. Staff K had no annual performance review completed from 07/2024-07/2025. On 02/27/2026 at10:50 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, said none of the CNA annual performance reviews were completed for their review periods and they should have been. Reference WAC 388-97-1680 (1), (2)(a-c)

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of recorded food temperatures, the facility to prepare food in a manner that conserved nutritive value, palatability and that ensured meals served were appetizing and at appropriate temperatures. The facility's failure to follow written recipes for preparation of pureed food, to ensure cold beverages were maintained at or below 40 degrees, and hot food at or greater than 135 degrees during meal service, resulted in residents being served unpalatable food and beverages at unappetizing temperatures. These failures placed the residents at risk for decreased intake, weight loss and dissatisfaction with meals.Findings included . <Meal Preparation>Observation of meal preparation on 02/26/2026 at 10:59 AM, showed Staff BB, Cook, preparing pureed carrots. Staff BB grabbed a large metal container of cooked carrots and used a spatula to push an unmeasured amount into a smaller 6 x 6 metal container. Staff BB then used a handheld immersion blender to blend the carrots for 45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow and/or implement transmission-based precautions (TBP, infection-prevention measures for known or suspected infections used in addition to Standard Precautions) for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 52, 40, 58, and 17) reviewed for transmission-based precautions. The facility did not ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and implemented TBP for symptomatic residents. This failure placed residents and staff at risk for cross-transmission with infectious pathogens. Findings included.Review of the facility policy, titled IPCP [Infection Prevention and Control Program] Standard and Transmission-Based Precautions, revised 08/2025, documented for Contact Precautions PPE use would include wearing a gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the patient or the patient's environment. Staff were to don (put on) PPE upon room entry, then doff (take off) and properly discard PPE and perform hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were informed and provided consent before administering psychotropic (medications that alter moods, behaviors, thoughts or perceptions, and affects the brain) medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for right to be informed about treatment decisions. This failure placed residents and/or resident representatives at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 2 Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, vascular dementia (a type of cognitive impairment caused by reduced blood flow to areas of the brain), and depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness or loss of interest). Resident 2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 02/04/2026, indicated severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 68 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the health status and/or care needs for 4 of 20 residents (Residents 43, 80, 7 & 24) whose Minimum Data Sets (MDS, an assessment tool) were reviewed. The failure to ensure active diagnoses, oral assessments, Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) status, and restorative services accurately reflected residents' health status and care provided, placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs. Findings included .Resident 43Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 03/23/2025 Annual and 12/02/2025 Significant Change MDS showed the resident was edentulous (no natural teeth or tooth fragments) and had no abnormal mouth tissue, ulcers, masses, or lesions. Oral Assessment Review of Resident 43's dental consultations showed the following: A dental consult, dated 09/09/2025, instructed staff to assist Resident 43 with cleaning their oral tissues and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed and/or reflected accurate mental health diagnosis for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 2 and 7) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving mental health services and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder (recurring intrusive thoughts or concerns), vascular dementia (a type of cognitive impairment caused by reduced blood flow to areas of the brain), and depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness or loss of interest). Resident 2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 02/04/2026, indicated severe cognitive impairment with inattention and disorganized thinking continuously present. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility with a Level 1 PASRR, dated 10/20/2025, received from the transferring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for 5 of 20 sampled residents (36, 2, 80, 7 & 43) reviewed for care plans. The failure to establish care plans that were individualized placed residents at risk for receiving inconsistent and/or inadequate care.Findings included. Resident 36 Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set, MDS-an assessment tool, dated 01/26/2026 documented Resident 36 was cognitively intact and on continuous oxygen therapy. On 02/23/2026 at 3:07 PM, Resident 36 was observed wearing a nasal cannula that was administering oxygen. A review of Resident 36's care plan, on 02/24/2026, did not show oxygen therapy listed as a focus, goal, or intervention/task. On 02/26/2026 at 11:32 AM, Staff X, Licensed Practical Nurse / Resident Care Manager said while looking at Resident 36's care plan that they did not have an oxygen care plan and they should. Staff X said her expectation was for oxygen to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to ensure that residents received weekly showers for 1 of 2 residents (3) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). This failure placed the residents at risk of poor hygiene and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 01/26/2026, documented Resident 3 was cognitively intact and was dependent to substantial/moderate assist with ADLs. On 02/23/2026 at 2:09 PM, Resident 3 said they had one shower since they had been in the facility. Resident 3 said things keep happening that delayed the shower, like physical therapy. Resident 3 said the nurse believed they were refusing showers. Resident 3 said they were not refusing and they would like a shower. A review of Resident 3's care plan on activities of daily living self-care performance deficit related to weakness, immobility, surgery on the nervous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing was consistently posted to include the actual nursing staff hours worked for 3 out of 6 days (02/22/2026, 02/23/2026 and 02/27/2026). This failure caused the facility's staffing information not to be readily available to residents and visitors who may wish to review it. Findings included .On 02/23/2026 at 9:53 AM, upon entrance to the facility, the daily nurse staffing was posted on the wall outside of the therapy room, it showed the dates for 02/19/2026, 02/20/2026 and 02/21/2026. No daily nurse staffing was posted for 02/22/2026 or 02/23/2026. On 02/27/2026 at 8:56 AM, the daily nurse staffing was from 02/26/2026. Staff B, Director of Nursing Services was walking past, was stopped and asked to confirm the daily nurse staffing posted on the wall. Staff B confirmed the daily nurse staff posting was dated 02/26/2026. Staff B said the daily nurse staffing should have been updated. When observation from 02/23/2026 were explained, Staff B said the daily nurse staffing should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure written menus were followed, planned menu items were served at the appropriate serving size, substitutions only occurred when necessary and were approved by the Registered Dietician and communicated to the facility residents, and appropriate serving sizes were provided. These failures detracted from residents' ability to determine if they wanted the main meal or the alternative meal when filling out their menus for the week, due to uncertainty if the listed meal would actually be served. This placed residents at risk of receiving food they did not request, therapeutic diet not being followed, and dissatisfaction with meals. Findings included Review of the posted menu showed on 02/26/2026 the lunch meal would be country fried steak, garlic mashed potatoes, garden blend vegetables with banana pudding. Residents on renal diets, two-gram sodium diets, or low fat/low cholesterol diets would be served a baked beef patty, garlic mashed potatoes, garden blend vegetables with banana pudding or oranges with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations of gradual dose reductions were followed for 3 of 4 sampled residents (1, 2, & 3) reviewed for gradual dose reductions. These failures placed residents at risk of taking unnecessary medications, avoidable medication side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 1Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of vascular dementia and anxiety disorder. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 08/19/2025, documented Resident 1 has severe cognitive impairment and required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADL).The care plan, dated 11/22/2024, documented staff would monitor target behaviors and monitor for side effects. The care plan, dated 05/15/2025, documented Resident 1 would receive hospice services and staff will assess the resident's coping strategies and respect their wishes.On 09/15/2025 at 12:39 pm, Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a personalized discharge plan based on each residents' identified needs, goals, and preferences and implement it timely for 2 of 3 residents (6 & 8) reviewed for discharge planning. This failure placed residents at risk for delayed discharge, unmet care needs after discharge and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 6> Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a cognitive communication deficit. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS/An assessment tool), dated 02/06/2025, documented Resident 6 had no cognitive impairment Care Plan, dated 07/31/2024, documented Resident 6 wished to return home with their son. Care Plan, dated 12/20/2024, document Resident 6 was waiting to discharge with their son until the Medicaid application was complete. Progress notes, dated 02/03/2025, showed Resident 6 was wanting to know discharge plans. The resident was told the Medicaid application was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and identify a change in urinary incontinence, ensure a plan for treatment and services to restore as much normal bladder and/or bowel function as possible for 2 of 3 residents (5 & 6) reviewed for urinary incontinence. Failure to identify and assess/determine causative factors of urinary incontinence placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 5> Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a fracture of the arm. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS/an assessment tool), dated 01/28/2025, documented Resident 5 had no cognitive impairment and was frequently incontinent of urine. The Bowel and Bladder Evaluation, dated 01/31/2025, documented Resident 5 was continent of urine. No further assessment or interventions were implemented. Care Plan, dated 02/25/2025, documented Resident 5 was occasionally incontinent of bladder related to diuretic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management to adequately control residents pain for 1 of 3 sampled residents (1) when reviewed for pain management. This failure put residents at risk of uncontrolled pain and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease with limits air flow and breathing). On 02/27/2025 at 3:46 PM, Resident 1 said when they were discharged , the facility sent them with a large bag full of medication. It was very overwhelming for Resident 1 to be given a bag with many different medications. Because Resident 1 was so overwhelmed, they did not notice any concerns with their pain medication. Resident 1 discovered once home they were sent home with only three oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication). Resident 1 experienced pain until they could get to the appointment with their community provider. No prescription was sent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to repeatedly implement antibiotic protocols to ensure antibiotics were appropriately prescribed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (1), reviewed for antibiotic use. This failure placed residents at risk of development of antibiotic-resistant organisms, adverse side effects, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On 02/27/2025 at 3:46 PM, Resident 1 said when they were sent home they were sent with a large bag full of medications. They did not know what all of the medications were for, and it was very confusing. Resident 1 went to their doctor and went through everything. They found two antibiotics that had many pills left. Resident 1 said they were never told to discontinue the medication but thinks they should have since they were getting these medications in the hospital. Resident 1 said it was very confusing. The Hospital…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal vaccine (used to prevent pneumonia and sepsis), was provided for 1 of 3 residents (1), reviewed for immunizations. This failure placed the resident at risk of acquiring, transmitting, and/or experiencing potentially avoidable complications from influenza disease. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Resident Consent for Influenza, Pneumococcal, and COVID-19 Vaccination, dated 01/15/2025, documented Resident 1 wished to receive the pneumococcal vaccine. The documents were signed by the nurse on the same day. Review of Resident 1's electronic health record showed no documentation that Resident 1 was provided a pneumococcal vaccination. On 04/01/2025 at 4:35 PM, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) and Director of Nursing (DNS), said there was a consent signed from the resident indicating they would like the vaccine. Staff B said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death) vaccine was provided for 1 of 3 residents (1), reviewed for immunizations. The failure to provide the COVID-19 vaccination placed the resident at risk for contracting the COVID-19 virus and related complications. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Resident Consent for Influenza, Pneumococcal, and COVID-19 Vaccination dated 01/15/2025, documented Resident 1 wished to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The documents was signed by the nurse on the same day. Review of Resident 1's electronic health record showed no documentation that Resident 1 was provided a COVID-19 vaccination. On 04/01/2025 at 4:35 PM, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) and Director of Nursing (DNS), said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide an Advanced Directive (AD, a written instruction of health care directions) for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 59, 28, 43 & 60 ) reviewed for ADs. This failure placed residents at risk for losing their right to have their healthcare preferences and/or decisions honored. Findings included . 1) Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/10/2024, documented Resident 59 was cognitively intact. Resident 59's Electronic Health Record (EHR), documented an AD receipt was signed by Resident 59 on 10/15/2024, indicating Resident 59 had chosen not to formulate an AD at this time. Review of Resident 59's EHR documented, prior to 10/15/2024, no other attempts to offer or assist Resident 59 with formulating an AD. On 11/06/2024 at 2:43 PM, Staff I, Patient Advocacy Resource, said he was unable to locate any other AD's for Resident 59. At 2:54 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Olympic Hallway> On 11/13/2024 at 11:02 AM, observation of the carpet in the activity room in the Olympic Hallway showed the carpet was worn and heavily soiled. There was a three by four-foot circular stain just inside and to the right of the entrance. Five additional one by one-foot dark brown circular stains with distinct edges were noted on the carpet throughout the room. The stains appeared to be the result of spilled liquids that had dried prior to being cleaned up. On 11/05/2024 at 1:12 PM, Staff C, Resident Care Manager, said the activity room had been previously used as the assist dining room. <Mountainview Hallway> On 11/13/2024 at 11:04 AM, observation of the carpet in front of the first kiosk in the Mountainview hallway showed the carpet had been cut in multiple places and replaced with non-matching carpet (different color and pattern). An approximately eight-foot by four-foot section of carpet had been replaced with darker brown carpet with a different pattern and an approximately 18 foot by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were initiated, logged, investigated, and/or promptly resolved/responded to for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 40) and the Resident Council reviewed for grievances. This failure placed residents at risk for feelings of frustration, powerlessness, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances, revised 02/01/2017, showed that general concerns could be voiced at Resident Council (a group of residents that meet regularly to discuss living at the facility) meetings, and that the concern would be evaluated and investigated. A response would occur within three working days to the individual with the concern, to acknowledge the steps taken for resolution. <Resident Greivance> Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessement tool), dated 10/17/2024, documented Resident 40 was cognitively intact. On 10/22/2024, Resident 40 filed 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer/discharge notice to the resident and/or their representative for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 18, 40, 16 & 60), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk for not having an opportunity to make informed decisions about transfers/discharges. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy section, Admission/Discharge/Transfer, revised in 11/2016, said Information shall be provided to the resident and/or his/her representative in a language they can understand at the time of .transfer to the general acute hospital. 1) Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 08/05/2024, documented the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 18's progress notes in the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 18 transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and discharged from the hospital and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to the resident and/or their representative for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 40, 16 &60), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk for not having an opportunity to make informed decisions about bed hold and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/17/2024, documented Resident 40 was cognitively intact. Resident 40's Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 40 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and discharged from the hospital and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 40's EHR did not show documentation that Resident 40 was offered and/or provided a bed hold notice. On 11/12/2024 at 10:05 AM, Staff E, Resident Care Manager/Registered Nurse, said Social Services completed bed hold notifications, but could not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS, an assessment tool) accurately reflected the status for 6 of 25 sampled residents (Residents 53, 10, 21, 56, 176 & 23) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident 53 was moderately cognitively impaired, had a weight loss of 5% or more and was on a prescribed weight loss program. On 11/12/2024 at 12:45 PM, Staff B, Diretor of Nursing Services (DNS), said when a Resident was on a prescribed weight loss program the facility should be monitoring weights weekly with the interdisciplinary team, the Registered Dietitian should be completing weekly reviews, and there must a Physician order for the diet plan. Staff B said the Resident must be involved in the weigh loss program too. When asked about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans (CPs) were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected residents' care needs for 7of 35 residents (Residents 62, 176, 376, 67, 23, 28, and 21) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 62 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-performance CP, revised 04/26/2024, directed staff to provide one person assistance with bathing per the resident's chosen schedule. The care plan did not identify what the resident's chosen bathing schedule was. 2) Resident 176 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 11/04/2024 at 3:38 PM, Resident 176 said they wanted a shower at least every three days but was scheduled for only one. An ADL CP, revised 10/30/2024, showed the resident required substantial assistance with bathing. The care plan did not identify the resident's desired type (shower,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were provided scheduled bathing/showering opportunities for 6 of 8 residents (Residents 43, 19, 64, 176, 67 and 62) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). This failure placed residents at risk of not having their ADL care needs met and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 10/22/2024, documented Resident 43 was moderately cognitively impaired and required substantial/maximal assistance with showering/bathing. The Shower Schedule dated 10/6/2024, documented Resident 43's shower day was to occur on Tuesdays during day shift. Resident 43's shower record, dated 10/15/2024 through 11/7/2024, documented no bathing activity was documented from 10/15/2024 until 10/29/2024, for 14 days. There were no refusals documented. On 11/08/24 at 9:59 AM, Staff Q, Certified Nursing Assistant, when informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services at the frequency residents were assessed to require for 6 of 7 residents (Residents 48, 22, 55, 46, 25 and 61) reviewed with restorative nursing programs (RNPs). The failure to provide RNPs at the frequency residents were assessed to require, placed residents at risk for decrease in Range of Motion (ROM), development and/or progression of contractures, increased dependance on staff for care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 48 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed the resident was cognitively intact, and did not receive restorative nursing services during the assessment period. A restorative nursing care plan, initiated 08/15/2024, showed the resident would be provided active ROM restorative program to bilateral (both) upper extremities (UE) and lower extremities (LE) five times a week (5x/wk.), to maintain ROM and prevent contracture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving enteral feedings, were administered enteral formula at the physician ordered rate and volume for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 21) reviewed for enteral feeding. The facility also failed to ensure routine resident weights were obtained, reviewed, weight loss trends identified, and nutritional nutritional interventions were timely identified and implemented for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 64 and 21) reviewed for weight loss. Additionally, the facility failed to have a system in place that ensured fluid intake was accurately monitored, documented, and 24-hour intake totals were calculated and evaluated, and labs were monitored for fluid and electrolyte imbalances for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 58 and 10) reviewed with a fluid restrictions. These failures placed residents at risk for continued weight loss, inadequate nutrition, fluid volume overload, fluid and electrolyte imbalances and other medical complications. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to provide and supervise care as evidenced by information provided by 7 resident interviews (Resident 18, 19, 59, 64, 376, 40 & 58), Resident Council interviews (Residents 40 & 59) and Staff interviews (Staff E, BB, CC, DD, EE & H) and as evidenced by failed practices in many identified quality of life and quality of care areas. The facility had insufficient staff to ensure residents received assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) including grooming and showers, assessments, care planning, care plan revision, restorative services, hospice services and infection control in accordance with established clinical standards, and resident needs and preferences. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, negative outcomes and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident Interviews> On 11/04/2024 at 11:03 AM, Resident 18, said staff would come in and tell them they were busy and would have to wait. At 11:18 AM, Resident 19 said staff took a long time to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and supplies were removed/discarded in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (Medicare A and Medicare B medication room) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving compromised and/or ineffective medications and medical supplies. Finding included . On 11/04/2024 at 2:50 PM, the following outdated medications and supplies were observed: - Package of blood glucose lancets, label read, facility should use or discard by 06/30/2024 - 3 bottles of blood glucose strips, expired 08/22/2024. - Ibuprofen 200 milligram (mg), opened, expired 09/2024. - Vitamin B-6 100 mg opened, expired 10/2024. - Daily Vitamin formula plus iron, opened, expired 08/2024. - Arexvy (a vaccine to protect against lower respiratory tract disease) 120 micrograms (mcg)/0.5mg vial in fridge, expired, label read, use or discard by 09/25/2024. - Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative vial in fridge, date accessed 09/13/2024, expired 10/13/2024. - Bottle of Urine Reagent Strips (used to test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a manner that ensured meals were appetizing, palatable and served at appropriate temperatures for 9 of 15 sampled residents (56, 43, 58, 19, 18, 59, 64, 13 and 126) reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for a decreased nutritional intake and dissatisfaction with meals. Findings included . <Resident Interviews> On 11/04/2024 at 2:02 PM, Resident 56 said, the food here stinks, the food texture is pasty, it feels like you are eating glue, like they glued it all together. The soups seem to be leftover stuff from other meals. At 12:14 PM, Resident 43 said the food did not always taste good and was often that the hot was not hot and the cold was not cold. On 11/05/2024 at 9:27 AM, Resident 58 stated, The food is terrible. It is not good. On 11/04/2024 at 11:00 AM, Resident 19 said he wanted a hot meal, the meals were consistently cold, and the bacon always had the taste of oil. Resident 19 said they had sent meals back because it was cold. At 11:05 AM, Resident 18 said the food was cold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' received therapeutic diets as prescribed by the physician, and/or assessed by the interdisciplinary team for 5 of 23 residents whose meals were observed (Residents 46, 24, 10, 50 and 42), and to provide the correct portion size for 6 of 6 residents (Residents 42, 71, 24, 43 64 and 127) observed with orders for small or large portions. Failure to ensure residents' received physician ordered therapeutic diets and/or portion sizes placed residents at risk for medical complications and/or unmet nutritional needs. Findings included . <Therapeutic Diets> On 11/12/2024 at 11:20 AM, dietary staff had already placed beverages and condiments on all resident trays and placed them into the tray carts. Observation of the trays at that time, showed each tray had been provided a container of tartar sauce. Review of the therapeutic menu for the lunch meal, which consisted of cakes, rice pilaf with mushrooms, seasoned green peas with chocolate cream pie, showed the following diet types were not to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to seek/ obtain approval from the Resident Council, and to ensure residents were provided a nourishing snack at bedtime, when the time between the dinner and breakfast meals was increased from 14 hours to 15 hours. These failures precluded residents from having input about extending the time between meals beyond 14 hours and placed them at risk for feelings of hunger and inadequate nutrition. Findings included . a) The Garden Room and Medicare A hall were served dinner at 5:00 PM and breakfast at 8:00 AM, for a total of 15 hours in between meals. b) Medicare B was served dinner at 5:10 PM and breakfast at 8:10 AM, for a total of 15 hours in between meals c) [NAME] Mountain and Mountain View Halls were served dinner at 5:15 - 5:20 PM and breakfast at 8:15 - 8:20 AM, for a total of 15 hours in between meals. On 11/14/2024 at 7:45 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, said they were unable to find documentation to show they sought approval from the Resident Council prior to extending the time between Dinner and Breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place that ensured effective communication, collaboration, and coordination of care occurred between the facility and the hospice provider for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 64 & 28) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to obtain and/or maintain a copy of a resident's current hospice coordinated plan of care, to have documentation in residents' Electronic Health Records (EHR) that showed what hospice disciplines (e.g. registered nurse, chaplain, certified nursing assistant, massage therapist) had visited, when they visited, and what care was provided. These failures detracted from staffs' ability to effectively collaborate, communicate and coordinate care with the hospice provider and placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's Hospice Service Agreement, effective date [DATE], showed the facility and hospice would each designate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene, follow Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, equipment worn to minimize exposure to a variety of hazards requirements for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control method that involves wearing gowns and gloves during high-contact interactions with residents in nursing homes) orders, failed to prevent cross-contamination for food and PPE carts, and failed to prevent medical equipment from touching the floor for 3 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 7, 21 & 56) and 1 of 3 halls (Med Cart B Hall) reviewed for infection control practices. These failures placed residents at risk of developing and transmitting infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <EBP> 1) Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to understand and express written and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pneumococcal vaccines for 3 of 6 residents (Residents 176, 10 and 21) reviewed for vaccinations. This failure placed the residents at a higher risk for contracting pneumococcal infections, related complications, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 176 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/24//2024, showed the resident's pneumococcal vaccinations were not up to date and documented the pneumococcal vaccination had not been offered. A Resident Consent For Influenza, Pneumococcal, and COVID-19 Vaccination form, dated 10/18/2024, showed Resident 176 consented to the vaccination and checked the box on the form that stated, Yes, I wish to receive the pneumococcal vaccine according to the CDC's recommended schedule. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed the resident was not provided the pneumococcal vaccination despite giving written consent to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain the emergency fire doors in 1 of 3 main halls (outside room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for maintenance were in working order. This failure placed residents and staff at risk for falls, avoidable injury, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . During an observation on 11/04/2024 at 1:00PM, a square metal piece in the floor of Medicare A and Medicare B hallway was loose and sticking up. Facing north, the right fire door was closed to test whether or not the metal piece would hold the door and then allow the door to be opened. The exit bar had to be pushed upward and with a moderate amount of force in order to open the door. Staff P, Licensed Practical Nurse, walked by as the door was being tested and stated, oh good, that's back again, pointing to the metal piece. On 11/05/2024 at 9:31 AM, the fire door was observed to be closed. Staff O, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) attempted to open the door, pushing against the exit bar with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to respect and value the residents' private space by not knocking and/or announcing themselves for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 19, 48 & 63) reviewed under resident rights for dignity. This failure placed residents at risk for being treated with lack of dignity and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Facility policy titled Residents Rights, revised 11/23/2016, documented, The resident has a right to dignified existence, self-determination and communication with, and access to individuals and services inside and outside the Facility. On 11/04/2024 at 10:34 AM, Staff F, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), walked into room [ROOM NUMBER]B without knocking or announcing themself. At 10:46 AM, when asked about how staff show dignity to residents before entering a resident room, Staff F said knocking on the door and introducing myself. When asked if it was acceptable to walk in without knocking or announcing themselves, Staff F said no, I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents had signed consent prior to psychotropic (group of drugs to treat mental health conditions) medication administration and that residents had the correct risks and benefits provided, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 21) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving medication without knowledge of the medication or correct side effects, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 21 had diagnoses of depression (overwhelming feeling of sadness and hopelessness) and dementia (condition affecting memory and thinking) with psychosis (detachment from reality). Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 08/26/2024, showed Resident 21 was dependent on staff for care. <Consent Form> Resident 21 was prescribed risperidone, which is an antipsychotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident choices regarding bathing frequency were honored for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 376 and 176) reviewed for choices. The facility's failure to accommodate resident preferences related to frequency and type of bathing placed residents at risk for feelings of un-cleanliness, powerlessness, diminished self-worth, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 376 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/05/2024, showed the resident was cognitively intact, required physical assistance with bathing, and choices related to bathing were identified as Very Important. On 11/04/2024 at 2:59 PM, Resident 376 reported that they were not asked how many or what type of bathing they preferred. Rather, upon admission they were informed they would get one shower a week on Sundays. Since I have been here, I have had one shower (resident made air quotes with her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a screening tool used to identify mental health needs) was accurate and a referral for Level II PASRR was sent in a timely manner for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 60 and 56) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving specialized mental health services, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 09/25/2024 documented that Resident 60 was cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of depression (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life.) A Level I PASRR, dated 09/05/2024 documented that Resident 60 was diagnosed with anxiety disorders (mental health disorders characterized by intense, excessive, and persistent worry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 56 and 126). This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified/ unmet care and safety needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 56 had diagnoses that included surgical amputation (removal of a limb), muscle weakness, and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/04/2024, showed Resident 56 needed assistance from staff for activities such as transferring to and from bed to a wheelchair or going from a sitting to a standing position. <Activities> Review of Resident 56's Activity Assessment, dated 09/26/2024, showed that Resident 56 enjoyed various activities including exercise groups, puzzles, and men's group. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 176) reviewed for communication, were provided appropriate treatment and services to maintain hearing. The failure to complete Resident 176's earwax removal treatment, resulted in Resident 176 indicating their ears remained clogged with wax and they still had difficulty hearing. This placed the resident at risk for feelings of frustration, diminished self-worth and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 176 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/24/2024, showed the resident was cognitively intact, had moderate difficulty hearing in some environments and did not have hearing aids or other hearing devices. On 11/04/2024 at 4:05 PM, Resident 176 reported they were experiencing ear pain and could not hear very well due to earwax build-up. The resident said he asked staff to declog their ears. The resident said the nurses put Debrox…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide treatments as ordered, and implement timely and appropriate interventions to prevent the worsening of PU (PU/PI, injury to the skin and underlying tissue due to prolonged pressure) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 64), reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure may have contributed to worsening/deterioration of the PU to the sacrum (the triangular bone at the base of the spine that connects the lower back to the pelvis). This failure placed residents at risk for skin injuries, PUs/PIs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Policy> Facility policy titled, Skin Care Policy/Procedure, revised 06/2016, stated, It is the policy of the facility that: 1. A resident who enters the facility without pressure injury does not develop pressure injury unless the individual's clinical condition or other factors demonstrate that a developed pressure injury was unavoidable; and 2. A resident having pressure injuries…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer parenteral (routes other than the digestive system to give fluids or medication) medication in a manner consistent with professional standards for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 126) reviewed for antibiotics. This failure placed residents at risk for complications, infections, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 126 had diagnoses including sepsis (bloodstream infection) and cellulitis (bacterial skin infection). Review of the Medicare-5 Day Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 10/28/2024, showed Resident 126 received intravenous (IV, through a vein) antibiotics. Review of the EHR showed Resident 126 had a single lumen peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a thin long tube that goes through a vein in the arm and goes to the larger veins near the heart for giving medications). Review of the EHR showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders were followed for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 72 and 10) reviewed for dialysis. This failure put residents at risk for medical complications and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 72 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) documented Resident 72 was cognitively intact. Resident 72's diagnosis included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD, a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids) and dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly). Resident 72 had a dialysis fistula (a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein that allows for direct access to the bloodstream for dialysis) to their left arm. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed that Resident 72 was going to dialysis three times a week from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations were acted upon for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 21) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of decreased effects of medication, medication complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Regimen Review, revised 08/2017, showed the MRR recommendations were to be provided to the responsible physician, facility's Medical Director, and the Director of Nursing within a week of the review. The provider would then document in the resident's medical record what was reviewed and if any actions needed to be taken. Nursing was responsible for providing a written response to the review, to be given to the pharmacist and to the facility to be filed. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 21 had diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality of care for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 72 & 56) reviewed for unnecessary medications related to providing ordered medication. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications and a decreased quality of life. 1) Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 10 had a diagnosis of ESRD, required renal dialysis, and had a port (implanted venous access device). Review of the Quarterly Medicare MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident 10 was cognitively intact. Resident 10 had an order for removing the dressing on Resident 10's port two hours after dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. Review of the November 2024 administration record showed the dressing was not being removed. Review of the November 2024 progress notes showed staff were not removing the dressing to prevent infection. During an interview on 11/12/2024 at 9:14 AM, Staff C, RCM, said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic (affecting the mind) medications by ensuring Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR) were attempted for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 27) reviewed for unnecessary medications and that GDR recommendations that included laboratory tests were followed up on for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 21) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications, receiving unnecessary medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 27 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life) and bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). The Annual Minimum Data Set, (MDS, an assessment tool) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received COVID-19 vaccines that were consented for, for 2 of 7 residents (Residents 10, 21) reviewed for vaccinations. This failure placed residents at risk for a decreased immune response to COVID-19, related complications if infected, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and consented to receive the COVID-19 vaccination on 05/13/2024 and 10/29/2024. During an interview on 11/13/2024 at 8:51 AM, Staff C, Resident Care Manager (RCM), said the COVID-19 vaccinations were not previously ordered from the supplier, and now the infection control nurse was aware and would be ordering. During an interview on 11/14/2024 at 8:34 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing (DNS), said it did not meet expectations that Resident 10 signed consent and the COVID-19 vaccine was not ordered from the supplier. 2) Review of the EHR showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were held with the resident for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for participation in care planning. This failure placed residents at risk of not being fully involved and informed of decisions about care and services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure and chronic kidney disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 8/13/2024, documented Resident 2 was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance from staff with activities of daily living. The care plan, revised on 04/10/2024, documented Resident 1 wished to return to their apartment. Interventions included that the facility would evaluate/record abilities and strengths and determine gaps which effected discharge with an interdisciplinary team. Review of Resident 2's electronic health record from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a personalized discharge plan based on each residents' identified needs, goals, and preferences and implement it timely for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for discharge planning. This failure placed residents at risk for delayed discharge, unmet care needs after discharge and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure and chronic kidney disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 8/13/2024, documented Resident 2 was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance from staff with activities of daily living. The care plan, revised on 04/10/2024, documented Resident 1 wished to return to their apartment. The facility would evaluate/record abilities and strengths and determine gaps which effected discharge with an interdisciplinary team. On 10/14/2024 at 3:25 PM, Resident 2 said he wanted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and determine appropriate treatments for a chronic skin condition for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for skin conditions, non-pressure. This failure placed all residents at risk for unmet needs, pain and discomfort, declining health, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease (the vessels of the heart become narrowed or blocks affecting the legs and feet), and peripheral angiopathy (a buildup of fat in the arteries of the legs and arms). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 8/27/2024, documented Resident 2 has moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living. The care plan, revised 09/01/2024, documented Resident 1 had diabetes mellitus and was at risk for skin breakdown. The resident would have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary diabetic nail care and treatment in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 1) reviewed for foot care. This failure placed residents at risk for developing further medical complications, discomfort and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease (the vessels of the heart become narrowed or blocks affecting the legs and feet), and peripheral angiopathy (a buildup of fat in the arteries of the legs and arms). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 8/27/2024, documented Resident 2 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living. The care plan, revised 09/01/2024, documented Resident 1 has diabetes mellitus. The resident required daily inspection of feet for sores, blisters,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were compliant with Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) guidelines and standards of practice for 4 of 4 units (Mountain View, [NAME] Mountain, Medicare A and Medicare B) reviewed for IPC procedures when the facility failed to ensure staff followed standards of practice related to donning (placing on) recommended Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to entering a room with resident(s) who were positive for COVID-19 (a highly transmissible respiratory virus) and following recommendations to keep doors closed to rooms with residents on aerosol precautions due to COVID-19, and source control masking. This failure placed all residents, staff and visitors at risk for contracting and potentially spreading COVID-19. On 01/02/2024 at 9:25 AM, the facility lobby was observed with a sign indicating there were COVID-19 positive residents in the facility and all staff were to wear N95s for source control. Staff A, Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were provided for dependent residents including toileting for one of three residents (Resident 3) reviewed for ADL care. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed for which they were unable to perform themselves and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Date Set, (MDS) an assessment tool, dated 12/09/2023, documented Resident 3 was cognitively intact and required maximum assistance from staff for toileting. The care plan intervention, initiated on 07/31/2023, documented the resident was to be toileted in the morning when waking, after meals, and at night. Review of the ADL task record for toileting showed Resident 3 was toileted 27 times in the previous 30 days, less than once per day. Review of a facility investigation report, dated 12/08/2023, documented Resident 3 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer the influenza and pneumococcal vaccine to 2 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2). This failure placed residents at risk for developing influenza and pneumonia and medical complications. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 11/14/2023, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 1's medical record did not show documentation of the resident's influenza or pneumococcal vaccine status. The medical record did not document if the resident was offered or received an influenza or pneumococcal vaccine. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, and the influenza and pneumococcal vaccine was not offered. Resident 2's medical record did not show documentation of the resident's influenza or pneumococcal vaccine status. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were provided education on the risks and benefits including potential side effects of the COVID-19 (a highly infectious respiratory illness caused by a virus) vaccine and ensure documentation of the acceptance or refusal to receive the vaccine was in the medical record for 3 of 8 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2 & 8) reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations. This failure placed residents and resident representatives at risk of not having the opportunity to make an informed decision about the COVID-19 vaccine and the adverse health effects of this communicable disease. Findings included . 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 1's immunization record on 01/04/2024, showed no documentation of an updated COVID-19 vaccination or documentation the facility provided education of the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine or that the resident was offered and declined the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider and act promptly to address concerns raised by residents for 4 of 4 sampled months (June 2023, July 2023, August 2023 & September 2023) reviewed for Resident Council. This failure to ensure resident concerns were considered, acted upon, or a rationale provided when action could not be taken, left residents at risk for unresolved concerns, frustration, a less than homelike environment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A facility policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances including Missing Items Policy, dated 08/19/2022, documented grievances may be voiced verbally during resident or family council meetings and the staff member receiving the grievance will record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated grievance form or assist the resident or family member to complete the form. Review of the facility's resident council meeting minutes showed residents voiced concerns about the following: <June 2023 > 1) The Garden Room doors needed to be fixed so residents could get in and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' care plans (CPs) were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected residents' care needs for 6 of 22 sample residents (Residents 58, 33, 64, 49, 57, and 36) whose CPs were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 58's electronic health record (EHR) showed the resident had a provider order, dated 06/21/2023, to titrate oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation greater than 90 %. The order did not include what diagnosis or condition the oxygen was intended to treat. Review of Resident 58's comprehensive CP showed no oxygen or respiratory CP had been developed or implemented. On 10/12/2023 at 1:47 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing (DON), stated that Resident 58's comprehensive CP needed to be revised to include the resident's use of supplemental oxygen. Resident 58's urinary catheter (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 4 of 8 sampled residents (Residents 64, 33, 83 and 58) reviewed for ADLs and choices. Failure to provide assistance with nail care and/or bathing to residents depend on staff for care, placed the residents at risk for unmet needs, poor hygiene, diminished self-image, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 64 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 09/04/2023, showed the resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing and bathing. On 10/10/2023 at 11:17 AM, Resident 64 said that their toenails had not been cut since they admitted to the facility and stated, They need it. Resident 64's toenails were observed and were long, thick, untrimmed, and starting to curve around the end of the toes. Resident 64's ADL care plan (CP), revised 09/11/2023, showed there was no direction to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities to meet the individual residents' interests and needs for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 9, 69 and 49) reviewed for activities. This failure placed the residents at risk for boredom, isolation, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], showed the resident was cognitively impaired and it was very important for the resident to do things with groups of people. Resident 9's Activity Quarterly Evaluation, dated 10/10/2023, showed the resident liked group activities that included bingo, music events and birthday/holiday socials. Resident 9's care plan, dated 08/05/2023, showed the following interventions: engage in simple, structured activities that avoid overly demanding tasks, provide a program of activities that accommodates abilities, introduce residents with similar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided in accordance with Physician's orders and accepted professional standards of practice for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 57, 49 and 58) reviewed for respiratory care when the facility failed to identify and implement maintenance and monitoring orders for resident continuous positive airway pressure/bilevel positive airway pressure machines (CPAP/BIPAP, a form of non-invasive ventilation therapy used to facilitate breathing) and to document the administration of oxygen on resident(s) Medication Administration Records(MAR). This placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unnecessary oxygen use, respiratory compromise, and other negative health care outcomes. Findings included . 1) Resident 57's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 08/15/2023, showed the resident required the use of a BIPAP and supplemental oxygen during the assessment period. Resident 57's physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerator temperatures were maintained within acceptable ranges and/or failed to document refrigerator temperatures for 2 of 3 refrigerators reviewed for food service. These failures placed residents at risk of food-borne illness and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Out of Range Temperatures> Review of the July 2023, August 2023, September 2023, and October 2023 temperature logs for the Reach-In refrigerator in kitchen, showed refrigerator temperatures were recorded at over 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) on the following dates: July 2023: 4th 44F, 7th 42F, 8th 43F, 9th 44F, 10th 42F, 16th 43F, 17th 46F, 19th 42F, 21st 43F, 22nd 44F, 23rd 46F, 26th 46F, 30th 42F, 31st 50F. August 2023: 5th 42F, 6th 45F, 7th 45F, 8th 44F, 10th 44F, 12th 42F, 13th 43, 14th 47F, 15th 49F, 17th 43F, 20th 43F, 21st 45F, 22nd 47F, 24th 42F, 27th 44F, 28th 45F, 29th 47F. September 2023: 3rd 42F, 4th 43F, 5th 44F, 7th 43F, 9th 42F, 10th 47F, 11th 48F, 12th 46F, 15th 46F, 16th 42F, 17th 43F, 18th 46F, 18th 43F,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in a dignified manner which maintained and enhanced quality of life for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 51 & 55) reviewed for dignity. This failure placed residents at risk for feelings of embarrassment, disrespect, decreased self-worth and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 51 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 09/16/2023, documented Resident 51 was cognitively intact. On 10/09/2023 at 2:18 PM, Resident 51 said she requested assistance from staff to use the bathroom prior to breakfast. Resident 51 said they were told staff could not assist residents until after staff had finished delivering breakfast trays to all residents. Resident 51 said this resulted in them urinating in their night gown and on their recliner chair. Resident 51 stated, I'm tired of this. Resident 51 said staff did not come in to change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS, an assessment tool) were completed within 14 days of the assessment reference date (ARD) as required for 1 of 20 (Resident 58) sample residents reviewed for timely assessments. Failure to timely complete resident quarterly assessments, placed residents at risk for a delay in identification of care needs and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI, a manual that directs staff on requirements for completion of MDS's), showed quarterly assessments must be completed no later than the ARD +14 calendar days. Resident 58's electronic health record showed a quarterly MDS had an ARD of 09/26/2023. Review of the quarterly MDS completion date showed it was not completed until 10/13/2023, 17 days after the ARD. On 10/13/2023 at 9:21 AM, Staff D, MDS Assistant, said Resident 58's 09/26/2023 quarterly MDS assessment was completed late. Reference WAC 388-97-1000(5)(d) .

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurate and reflected the residents' health status for 1 of 20 sampled residents (Resident 33) reviewed for assessments. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . Resident 33 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 33's Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (screening tool for intellectual disabilities or mental illness), dated 03/31/2023, showed the resident had indicators of serious mental illness related to diagnoses of depression and anxiety disorders. Resident 33's admission orders, dated 04/02/2023, showed the resident had orders for an antianxiety medication for a diagnosis of anxiety, and an antidepressant medication for a diagnosis of depression. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 04/06/2023, documented Resident 33 received antidepressant medication on five of five days during the assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 3 of 20 sampled residents (Residents 49, 57 and 58) of 20 reviewed. The failure to follow and/or clarify incomplete physician's orders when indicated, and to only sign for those tasks completed, placed residents at risk for medication errors and unmet care needs. Findings included . 1) A physician order for Resident 58, dated 06/21/2023, documented to provide Foley catheter care (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag) and check function every shift. Resident 58's electronic health record (EHR) showed a 08/30/2023 nurses note which documented Resident 58's urinary catheter was discontinued. Resident 58's August and September 2023 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed facility nurses signed they provided catheter care and validated the catheter was functional on 08/31/2023 day, evening, and night shift; and 09/01/2023 day and night shift, after the catheter had been discontinued. On 10/12/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently assist with the application of a hearing aid for 1 of 2 residents sampled residents (Resident 36) reviewed for communication. This failure placed residents at risk for communication difficulties, frustration, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 36's physician orders, dated 08/22/2022, showed the facility staff were to assist the resident in application of the left hearing aid every morning and the hearing aid was kept in the medication room at night. On 10/09/2023 at 3:33 PM, Resident 36 said they had trouble obtaining their hearing aid from staff in the morning. The resident said they wanted to wear the hearing aid. At 3:33 PM, Resident 36 was observed with no hearing aid in the left ear. On 10/10/2023 at 11:42 AM, Resident 36 was observed with no hearing aid in the left ear. On 10/11/2023 at 11:13 AM, Resident 36 was observed with no hearing aid in the left ear. At 2:37 PM, Resident 36 was observed with no hearing aide in the left ear. Resident 36 said they wanted the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent decline in range of motion for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 9) reviewed for mobility. This failure placed residents at risk for loss of functional mobility, further decline in range of motion and discomfort. Findings included . Resident 9 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (an assessment), dated 07/11/2023, showed the resident had functional limitation in range of motion in their upper and lower extremities. Resident 9's medical provider progress note, dated 09/13/2023, showed Resident 9 had contractures (fixed tightening of joints) of both knees. Resident 9's electronic health record on 10/12/2023 at 2:57 PM, showed no documentation of a nursing restorative program. On 10/12/2023 at 3:00 PM, Staff V, Therapy Program Manager, said Resident 9 was seen in July of 2023 for therapy. Staff V said the therapist established a nursing restorative program for the resident when the resident was discharged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nutrition and hydration between meals for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 69) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed the resident at risk for thirst, hunger, and discomfort. Findings included . Resident 69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia and malnutrition. The Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/21/2023, showed the resident had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance for eating and transfers. Resident 69's Registered Dietician nutrition note, dated 10/08/2023, showed the resident was underweight and staff were to provide support and encouragement for the resident to consume as many foods and beverages as possible. Resident 69's care plan, dated 07/31/2023, showed staff were to offer and encourage snacks/fluids between meals, encourage to drink fluids of choice at least 1000 cubic centimeter [milliliters]/day, and offer drinks during one-to-one visits. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized non-pharmacological care approaches and/or meaningful activities for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 69) reviewed for dementia. This failure placed residents at risk for unnecessary medications, unrelieved distress, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. Resident 69's Medical Provider Progress Note, dated 09/26/2023, showed the resident had a diagnosis of dementia and was seen for persistent anxiety, agitation, and constant yelling, screaming. Review of Resident 69's care plan, dated 07/31/2023, showed no documentation related to Resident 69's constant yelling and screaming. Resident 69's Behavior/Psychoactive Medication interdisciplinary team (IDT) review, dated 09/28/2023, showed the resident had a target behavior of agitation and calling out repeatedly. The review showed the behaviors had worsened since the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that nursing assistants demonstrated competency caring for residents after a fall for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed medical attention, unnecessary pain, and potential clinical complications. Record review of the facility's undated policy titled, Incidents and Accidents, showed that in the event of an incident or accident, immediate assistance will be provided, and any injuries will be assessed by the licensed nurse and the affected individual will not be moved until safe to do so. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 04/28/2023, showed the resident was cognitively intact and had a prior fall with injury. On 08/23/2023 at 10:13 AM, Resident 1 stated that they had taken themselves to the bathroom on 07/18/2023 in the evening and had fallen. The resident stated that two nursing assistants put them back in bed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
THE ENSIGN GROUP, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 08/01/2023
BURNAM, SOONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/21/2022
CANARY, ADAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2025
KRETCHMAR, JOSHUAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/19/2025
FARNSWORTH, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2023
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2014
PORT, BARRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/26/2018
ACTRIV HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2023
BREMER HEALTH HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
STANDARD BEARER HEALTHCARE OP, LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$457K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 15%Other / private 17%

This home reported $457K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$415per resident / day
operating cost
$12,617per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$431per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505290. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next