No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Puget Sound Transitional Care

2800 South 224th Street,, Des Moines, WA 98198 · For profit - Corporation · 165 certified beds · (206) 824-0600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2026Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
23213 Pacific Hwy S · (206) 870-8880 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
23003 Pacific Hwy S · (206) 870-1832 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
22848 Pacific Hwy S · (206) 556-8698 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
22323 Pacific Hwy S · (206) 722-5757

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.7%14.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms57.9%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened49.0%17.2%16.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.0%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.5%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.6%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.5%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.5%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.8%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.3%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.0%13.4%12.0%typical

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.9%CMS range 45.0–66.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.2–13.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified86.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting92.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.6–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.76
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.22
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
32.4%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 165 beds and averages 81.1 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 84 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

21
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-27)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

63 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-07-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Basic Life Support (BLS) was initiated immediately, as directed in the facility policy, including Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR - an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions combined with giving breaths of air) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for unexpected death in the facility. This failed practice placed 48 additional residents (Residents 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 & 51), who had current physician orders to receive CPR, at serious risk for adverse outcome including death and constituted an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). On [DATE] at 2:05 PM, the facility was notified of an IJ in F678. The facility removed the immediacy on [DATE] after they audited the records of all residents, audited the Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a form indicating the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse and the right to be free from physical abuse by (Resident 2). The facility failed to assess, monitor and implement safety interventions to protect residents from residents with known behaviors. These failures placed residents at risk of physical and psychosocial harm, mental anguish, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised 04/2025, documented each resident had the right to be free from abuse, and mistreatment. The policy documented the facility would identify, assess, and implement a care plan for appropriate interventions, and monitor residents with behaviors that might lead to conflict.<Resident 1>Review of the annual Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 03/22/2026, showed Resident 1 had Dementia (memory impairment), depression, pain and used a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a soft, flexible plastic feeding tube inserted directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall) received the appropriate treatment and services according to professional standards of practice for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 & 2) reviewed for tube feeding management. The facility failed to follow and implement the physician's orders pertaining to tube feeding volume delivery to meet the resident's assessed nutritional requirements (Resident 1) and failed to ensure ongoing review and evaluation regarding the discontinuation of the PEG site after adequate oral nutrition was established and achieved by the resident (Resident 2). These failures placed residents at risk for inadequate nutrition/hydration, PEG site complications including infection, unnecessary pain/discomfort, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included. <Facility Policy>The facility policy titled, Gastrostomy Tube Care and Management, revised 04/2025, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical records were complete, accurate, and reflected the actual care provided for 1 of 7 sample residents (Resident 7) reviewed for resident records. The failure to ensure wound care completion was documented accurately in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) placed residents at risk for inaccurate representation of wound condition and care, unnecessary repetition of dressing changes, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included. <Facility Policy>The facility policy titled, Skin and Wound Monitoring and Management, revised 04/2025, showed the facility would implement wound care approaches that were consistent with the resident's Care Plan (CP) including monitoring the impact of interventions and modifying them as appropriate based on any identified wound change(s) via documentation in the TAR. The policy showed the facility would confirm all treatment orders were implemented as ordered.<Resident 7>According to the 11/25/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents received required written notices and Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) notifications at the time of transfer/discharge for 6 of 7 residents (Residents 1, 7, 9, 3, 11, & 53) and report to receiving hospital for 2 of 7 residents (Residents 3 & 11) reviewed for hospitalization. Failure to ensure a written notification was provided to the resident and/or representative in a language and manner the resident and/or representative understood, notify the LTCO as required of the reasons for the discharge, and give a report to the receiving hospital on resident's condition placed residents at risk for a discharge that was not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care/preferences, and a break in communication and continuity of care. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised 04/2025 Criteria for Discharge policy, the facility would provide the resident or their representative with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CPs) were updated and revised periodically and as needed for 5 of 19 sample residents whose CPs were reviewed (Residents 57, 28, 2, & 11). This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, unnecessary care, and frustration.Findings included.<Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised 04/2025 Comprehensive Care Planning policy, the facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) would develop a comprehensive, person-centered CP including measurable goals and timeframes. The policy showed CPs would be reviewed and revised quarterly, and as needed to meet the resident's ongoing needs. <Resident 57> According to the 07/18/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool) Resident 57 used hearing aids. Review of the revised 07/30/2023 “impaired communication…” CP showed Resident 57 required hearing aids. Resident 57’s “alteration in sensory…” CP showed staff should provide Resident 57 with hearing aids daily. Observation on 08/25/2025 at 8:18 AM, 08/22/2025 at 7:52 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager met the minimum qualifications required in the absence of a full-time Registered Dietician for 1 of 1 facility kitchens. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs and other negative health outcomes. Findings included.Review of the facility's Key Personnel list showed Staff D was the facility's Dietary Manager for the facility. The list did not identify who worked as the facility's Registered Dietician.In an interview on 08/22/2025 at 9:33 AM Staff A (Interim Administrator) stated they would provide contact information for Staff C (Dietary Manager). Staff A wrote Staff C's phone number and email address on a sticky note and added on the note that Staff C worked three times a week and as needed at the facility, and that Staff D was currently enrolled in a dietary manager certification class.In an interview on 08/26/2025 at 9:42 AM, Staff D stated they worked as dietary manager for thirteen months. Staff D stated Staff C was on site at the facility on Thursdays.In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored under sanitary conditions for 2 of 2 unit refrigerators (200 & 300 unit refrigerators), and meal trays were distributed in a way that promoted food safety for 1 of 2 units (300 unit). These failures placed residents at risk for spoiled food, foodborne illness, injury, and infections. Findings included .<Policy>According to the facility's revised July 2014 Food Receiving and Storage Statement, food service or other designated staff would ensure food storage areas were always clean. The policy showed all food items stored in refrigerators on the unit would be kept below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and must be labeled with a use-by date, and all food belonging to residents must be labeled with the resident's name, the name of the item, and a use-by date. The policy did not identify a temperature below which frozen food must be stored.<Unit Snack Fridges> Observation of the 200 Unit snack refrigerator on 08/25/2025 at 8:59…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-27 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to educate and offer staff the Covid 19 (C19) vaccination for all staff when reviewed for vaccinations. This failure placed staff and residents at a higher risk of contracting C19 infections.Findings included .<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program - C19 vaccine for staff, dated 01/12/20222, the facility would educate staff on the risks and benefits of the C19 vaccines and offer to administer the vaccine to staff.In an interview on 08/25/2025 at 10:00 AM with Staff BB (Resource Infection Preventionist) and HH (Human Resource), Staff HH stated they do not keep records of staff C19 vaccinations or education of the vaccinations. Staff HH stated they understood that the Infection Preventionist (Staff BB) would keep employee records of the C19 vaccinations. Staff BB reviewed the infection preventionist records and stated they did not educate or offer any staff the C19 vaccine. Staff BB was unable to provide any staff C19 vaccination education or documentation staff were offered the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 9) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications had completed consents for psychoactive medications. Additionally, the facility failed to obtain consents for safety devices including bed against the wall and floor mats both sides of bed for 2 (Resident 2 & 3) of 7 residents reviewed for safety devices. These failures did not ensure residents were notified about their medications, safety devices, and facility policies. Findings included <Resident 9> According to the 07/27/2025 admission Medicare 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) Resident 9 had clear speech and was able to make themselves understood. The MDS showed Resident 9 had memory issues and demonstrated no behavior of rejection of care during the assessment period. Review of August 2025 Medication Administration Record on 08/26/2025 showed Resident 9 received an antianxiety medication on 08/22/2025, 08/23/2025, 08/24/2025, and on 08/26/2025. Review of Resident 9’s record showed no resident/representative approval…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide information and assistance to formulate an Advance Directive (a document describing a resident's wishes for care if they became incapacitated) for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 11 & 8) reviewed for advanced directives. This failure left residents at risk for losing the right to have their preferences and choices honored during emergent and end of life care. Findings included .<Policy>According to a facility policy titled, Advanced Directives and Associated Documentation, date 04/2025, showed the facility would provide written information to formulate an advance directive prior to, upon, or immediately after admission to all residents or their representative. The policy showed staff would document in the resident's record at the time of admission, the resident or representative had been provided written information regarding advance directives. The policy showed if a resident already had an advance directive staff would obtain a copy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 52 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the comprehensive assessments within the regulatory timeframes for 1 of 2 (Residents 64) supplemental residents, and 2 of 3 resident (Resident 18 & 93) reviewed as closed records for assessments and timing. The failure to ensure comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessments were completed timely hindered the care planning process necessary to provide the appropriate resident care and services, and placed residents at risk for unidentified care needs, delayed services, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included. <Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI - instructional guidelines for MDS completion) Manual>The October 2019 RAI Manual outlined an admission MDS was a comprehensive assessment for a new resident and, under some circumstances, a returning resident that must be completed by the end of day 14, counting the date of admission to the nursing home as day 1. The manual outlined an Annual MDS was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) accurately reflected the status of the resident for 2 of 19 sampled residents (Residents 53 and 71). This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .<Resident 53>According to the 05/08/2025 Quarterly MDS Resident 53 had a condition where the bladder muscles and nerves did not function properly due to damage to the nervous system. The MDS showed Resident 53 used an indwelling catheter (tubing to assist with bladder drainage). The MDS showed Resident 53 was always incontinent of bladder.Observation on 08/20/2025 at 9:28 AM showed Resident 53 lying in bed. Resident 53's catheter was attached to the bed frame below the resident.In an interview on 08/27/2025 Staff I (MDS Coordinator) stated it was important for MDS assessments to be accurate as they were the basis for care planning for residents. Staff I stated because Resident 53 used an indwelling catheter, his incontinence status should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level 2 comprehensive evaluation (a process to determine what mental health services residents required after a level 1 PASRR identified potential indicators of Serious Mental Illness - SMI) were obtained for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 1 & 3) whose PASRRs were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving the necessary mental health care and services they needed, frustration, and unmet mental health needs. Findings included. <Policy>According to the facility's revised 09/2018 PASRR policy, a PASRR would be completed upon admission rather than prior to admission as required. The policy showed based on assessment, residents would be referred to the state PASRR office for evaluation for specialized mental health services. The policy showed the facility's social services office was responsible for communication with the PASRR office.<Resident 1> According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility: failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for 3 of 19 (Residents 11, 62, & 5) sampled residents; failed to ensure nurses only signed for treatment once provided for 1 of 19 (Resident 1) sampled residents; failed to ensure physician's orders were clarified as needed for 1 of 19 (Resident 1) sampled residents; ensure physician's orders were in place prior to care for 2 of 19 (Residents 1 & 53) sampled residents. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs, and ineffective and/or delayed treatments. Findings included.<Following Orders> <Resident 11> According to the 08/07/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool) Resident 11 was at risk of pressure ulcers. The MDS showed Resident 11 had a pressure reducing device for their bed. Review of Resident 11’s 08/19/2025 Pressure Ulcer Development related to Impaired Functional Abilities Care Plan (CP) showed an intervention of a pressure relieving/reducing device for the resident’s bed. The CP also included an intervention of an air mattress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 1) of 1 sample residents reviewed for communication was provided with a functional communication system. Failure to identify and provide services to maintain effective communication placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, social isolation, and a diminished sense of well-being. Findings included . <Facility Policy>On 08/25/2025 at 1:13 PM, Staff A (Executive Director) stated they did not have language and communication policy for residents with English as a second language. <Resident 1>According to the 06/25/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple medical conditions and had no memory issues. The MDS showed Resident 1 was Asian, had clear speech and made self-understood and able to understand others. The MDS showed Resident 1's preferred language was not English and needed interpreter to speak with health care staff. Observations on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs - bathing, grooming, getting up, oral hygiene etc.) to residents dependent on staff assistance for ADL for 4 of 6 (Residents 10, 2, 11, & 13) residents reviewed for ADLs and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 53). The failure to provide assistance with showers, dressing, oral hygiene, and getting out of bed left residents at risk for frustration, poor hygiene, embarrassment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included. <Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised 07/2015 ADL policy, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) would provide ADL assistance to residents according to their individualized Care Plans (CPs). The policy showed CNAs would document the ADL assistance provided in the residents' medical records<Resident 10> According to the 07/22/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to offer and provide individualized activities plans and to document the refusals for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 11 & 2) reviewed for activities. Failure to consistently offer and provide meaningful individual activity plans left residents at risk of boredom, frustration, isolation, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. According to the facility's 04/2025 Activities Programming policy, the facility would ensure activities were available for all residents to meet resident's needs and interest that would support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well being of the resident. The policy showed the facility would conduct an activity evaluation at admission time to determine resident's preferences and interests including cultural preferences and spiritual preferences. The facility staff would make efforts to accommodate resident's preferences according to activity calendar. The policy showed the facility would provide assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility: Failed to ensure residents' skin was assessed weekly as ordered, monitored, and treated as required for 2 (Residents 9 & 10) of 4 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin. These failures placed all residents at risk for delay in treatment, worsening condition, unmet care needs, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy>Review of the facility's 04/2025 Skin and Wound Monitoring and Management revised policy showed the facility would provide care and services to prevent the development of new skin issues. The policy showed staff would perform weekly head-to-toe checks for all residents, document the findings in resident's record, and notify the provider to obtain treatment orders as needed. The policy showed nursing staff would implement the ordered interventions and develop a Care Plan (CP) for staff to consistently implement the care.<Resident 9> According to the 07/27/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 9 had memory impairment, was understood, and able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents admitted with Indwelling Catheters (I/C - a flexible tube inserted into the bladder) were assessed for the continued need for a I/C, attempted to remove the I/C as soon as possible for 1 (Resident 9) of 3 residents reviewed for the I/C. These failures placed residents at risk for urinary tract infections, decreased bladder tone (muscle strength), urethral erosion (gradual destruction of the tissues), and dignity issues. Findings included .According to the facility's 01/2025 Indwelling Catheter Care policy, Staff would provide catheter care to each resident with an I/C every day and as needed to promote hygiene, comfort and decrease the risk of infection.<Resident 9>According to the 07/27/2025 admission 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was assessed as cognitively impaired and had the indwelling catheter during the assessment period. In an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete safety assessments for a bed against the wall and fall mats on the floor for 2 of 7 residents (Residents 3 & 2) and a tilt-in-space wheelchair for 1 of 8 residents (Resident 77) reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed residents at risk for injury, entrapment, and other negative health outcomes.Findings included.<Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised 03/2016 Physical Restraints policy, placing a resident's bed close enough to the wall to prevent the resident from getting out of bed was considered a restraint. The policy showed when a restraint was assessed to be necessary, a physician's order should be in place and the risks and benefits explained to the resident and/or their representative (the Informed Consent process).<Resident 3> According to a 05/22/2025 Quarterly MDS Resident 3 had no memory impairment. The MDS showed Resident 3 had no restraints in place. Review of Resident 3’s health records showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%). Failure of 2 of 4 nurses (Staff U & V - Registered Nurses) to properly administer 2 of 32 medications for 1 (Resident 38) of 4 residents observed during medication pass resulted in a medication error rate of 6.25%. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse side effects and/or not receiving prescribed medications as ordered. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised 01/2025 Medication Administration policy, Medications would be accurately prepared, administered, and documented per physician order. The policy showed staff would check the medication label with the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to verify resident name, medication name, form, dosage, route, and time.<Resident 38>Observations on 08/20/2025 at 8:59 AM showed Staff U administered a blood thinner medication enteric coated (protective coated delays pills dissolution) to Resident 38 related to heart issues. Review of Resident 38's August 2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were returned or discarded when expired or when residents discharged for 1 of 1 medication rooms (200 Unit Medication Room) and 2 of 2 medication carts (200 North and 300 North medication carts) observed. The failure to ensure unneeded medications were returned to the pharmacy or destroyed upon resident discharge or expiration placed the residents at risk for receiving unauthorized, compromised, and/or ineffective medications. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised [DATE] Storage and Expiration of Medications and Biologicals policy, the facility would ensure all medications and biologicals were stored in an organized manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, and refrigerators with sufficient space to prevent crowding and inaccessible to visitors and residents. The policy showed medicines and biologicals that exceeded their use by date must be stored separately and returned to the pharmacy or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete Antibiotic (ABO) Stewardship to promote appropriate use of ABOs and reduce the risk of unnecessary ABO use for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 10 & 93) reviewed for unnecessary ABOs. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate/unnecessary use of ABOs.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program - ABO Stewardship, dated 03/2023, the Infection Preventionist (IP) or designee would be responsible for infection surveillance and multidrug resistant organism tracking. The policy showed the IP would collect and review all supporting labs and tests for ABO usage.<Resident 10>Review of Resident 10's health records showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an ABO prescribed for Sepsis (a life-threatening response to an infection). Review of Resident 10's records showed no supporting labs or test results for the ABO…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure toilets were functioning properly on 2 of 3 floors (Second and Third Floor) and failed to ensure call lights were functioning on 1 of 2 floors where residents lived (Third Floor). These failures placed residents at risk for a less-than-homelike environment, skin tears, the inability to call for help when needed, and frustration.Findings included. <Facility Policy>According to the facility's 10/04/2016 Resident Rights policy, residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.<Second Floor Family Room Bathroom> Observations on 08/25/2025 at 10:30 AM, 08/26/2025 at 11:13 AM, and 08/27/2025 at 9:30 AM showed the second-floor family room bathroom broken and not flushing adequately to clear its contents. <Sensory Room Bathroom> Observations on 08/20/2025 at 8:38 AM, and 11:14 AM showed the toilet in the sensory room broken and not thoroughly flushing adequately to clear its contents. In an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 7 staff (Staff C, D, & E) reviewed and 1 supplemental staff (Staff F) had the appropriate knowledge, competencies, and skill sets to provide nursing and related services, including Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR - an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions combined with giving breaths of air), to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident as determined by resident assessments, individual plans of care, and the facility assessment. Failure of the nursing staff to demonstrate a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics needed to successfully perform work roles or occupational functions resulted in deficiencies related to the competency of nursing staff and placed residents at risk for unmet care needs including not receiving CPR if/when needed, a diminished quality of life, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse prohibition policy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. The failure to report to the appropriate agencies as required by State and Federal laws regarding Resident 1's unexpected death placed residents at risk for exposure to potential abuse/neglect, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy titled, Reporting Alleged Violations of Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Mistreatment, revised [DATE], showed if there was an allegation or suspicion of abuse, the facility would make a report to the appropriate agencies including the State Survey Agency (SSA). The policy showed if the event(s) that caused the allegation resulted in serious bodily injury, the reporting requirement was to immediately report the incident, no later than two hours from the incident. The policy included the results of the investigation must be reported to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse prohibition policy for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. The facility failed to completely and thoroughly investigate Resident 1's unexpected death. The failure to initiate, conduct a thorough investigation, and correct actual or potential alleged violations left residents at risk for unidentified and/or repeated incidents of abuse/neglect and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse: Prevention of and Prohibition Against, revised [DATE], showed all allegations of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation would be promptly and thoroughly investigated by the Administrator or their designee. The policy showed the investigation would include information obtained from interviews with the person(s) reporting the incident, residents, witnesses, and staff across all shifts. The policy showed a review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep the kitchen environment clean and sanitary and failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 kitchen observed. Facility staff failed to: Label and date food; discard damaged/expired/spoiled food (including after thawing); and perform Hand Hygiene (HH) when handling raw eggs during food preparation. These failures contributed to an unsanitary and unsafe storage and preparation of food, and placed residents at risk for life-threatening food-borne illness and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of an undated facility provided document, Food Procurement, Storage and Distribution, showed the facility staff would keep track of when to discard perishable foods including covering, labeling, and dating of all food items stored in the refrigerator and/or freezer as indicated. The document showed the facility staff would inspect food items from safe transport and quality upon receipt and would ensure proper storage of food. The facility policy, Egg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and/or offer assistance to residents and/or their representatives to formulate Advance Directives (AD) for 8 of 17 residents (Residents 11, 59, 65, 80, 24, 77, 48, & 62) reviewed for ADs. These failures placed residents at risk of losing their right to have their stated preferences/decisions honored regarding medical treatment and end-of-life care. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility policy, Care and Treatment - Advance Directives, revised November 2016, showed the staff should inform and provide residents written information to formulate an AD. The policy showed, prior to, upon, or immediately after admission, the admission Nurse or Social Service staff would ask residents and/or their family members about the existence of any AD and should they indicate that they had one, the facility would require that a copy of such AD be included in the medical record. <Resident 11> According to the 05/09/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided an opportunity for a Care Conference (CC) for 5 of 17 sampled residents (Resident 44, 46, 2, 37, & 48). Failure to ensure residents were given the opportunity to participate in care conferences left residents at risk for unmet care needs, lessened participation in care planning, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 44> According to a 03/04/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 44 had complex medical conditions including heart failure, end stage kidney disease, and depression. The assessment showed Resident 44 had no memory impairment and could make themselves understood and understand others without difficulty. In an interview on 06/05/2024 at 10:40 AM Resident 44 stated they could not remember ever having a CC. Review of Resident 44's medical records on 06/10/2024 showed no documentation to support staff performed quarterly CC's. <Resident 46> According to a 03/20/2024 Quarterly MDS, Resident 46 had complex medical conditions including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Physician's Orders (POs) for 5 of 17 residents (67, 64, 24. 44, 46) reviewed for acquiring, implementing, and documenting physician orders. These failures left residents at risk for not receiving care they required, potential for new skin issues, and negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Air Mattress> <Resident 67> According to the 05/03/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Resident 67 admitted to the facility with a pressure ulcer and had pressure reduction mattress on their bed. Observations on 06/05/2024 at 8:41 AM, 06/06/2024 at 11:23 AM, and on 06/10/2024 at 9:37 AM showed Resident 67 lying in bed with an air mattress set at patient weight 320 lbs [pounds]. (The resident's weight is one of the parameters staff should enter on the air mattress pump to ensure the air mattress was safely installed for the specific resident and help alleviate pressure to prevent pressure ulcers) Review of Resident 67's Care Plan (CP) revised on 06/03/2024 showed Resident 67 had pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL), related to cleanliness and grooming for 5 (Residents 15, 44, 2, 80, & 24) of 17 sample residents reviewed for ADLs. Facility failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with bathing (Residents 15, 44, & 2), shaving (Residents 24 & 80), and nail care (Resident 24), placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, long facial hair, embarrassment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Bathing Assistance> <Resident 15> According to a 03/22/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), it was very important for Resident 15 to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath. Review of a revised 05/15/2024 Care Plan (CP) on 06/11/2024, Resident 15 preferred to have a shower once weekly and required staff assistance with bathing. This CP showed Resident 15 required one staff max assistance with moving in bed/repositioning, they used a wheelchair for locomotion, one staff max assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement ongoing communication and care coordination with the dialysis (a procedure to clean and filter the body's waste products) facility regarding treatment and services for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 24 & 11) reviewed for dialysis care. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, unidentified medical complications, adverse health outcomes, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's 03/2016 Specialty Care - Dialysis Services policy showed a contract and plan would be developed between the dialysis center and the facility in order to coordinate care and services. The policy showed the dialysis center would be asked to provide information with regards to the resident's visit, weights, and other pertinent information and a facility dialysis documentation form would accompany the resident to all appointments. <Resident 24> According to the 05/02/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 24 had clear speech, understood others…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 Percent (%). Failure to properly administer 16 of 26 medications for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 28 & 15) observed during medication pass resulted in a medication error rate of 61.54%. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving the correct dose or receiving less than the intended therapeutic effects of Physician Ordered (PO) medication. Findings included . <Facility Process> On 06/04/2024 at 8:52 AM Staff B (Director of Nursing) stated the facility's process was medications were expected to be administered within 1 hour prior to scheduled time until one hour after the scheduled time. <Resident 28> Observation of medication pass on 06/10/2024 at 7:01 AM, showed Staff M (Licensed Practical Nurse) enter Resident 28's room and administered the resident's morning medications. Review of resident 28's records on 06/10/2024 showed a PO with an immeasurable dose of one unit into each eye. 7 of the 12 medications administered to Resident 28 were not to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were informed of the nature and implications of entering into a binding Arbitration (a procedure used to settle a dispute using an independent person mutually agreed upon by both parties) Agreement (AA) for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 37 & 67) reviewed for arbitration. The facility failed to explain the AA in a form or manner that the resident and/or their representative understood (Resident 37) and failed to ensure the Durable Power of Attorney for Financial (DPOA-F) was the signatory on the AA (Resident 67) on behalf of the resident as required. These failures placed Residents 37 and 67 and other residents at risk of lacking understanding of the legal document signed, forfeiture (loss or giving up of something) of the right to a jury or court, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 37> Review of Resident 37's AA showed the contract was signed by the resident's DPOA-F on 05/29/2024. In an interview on 06/12/2024 at 11:38 AM, Resident 37's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and comfortable environment was provided to residents. Facility failure to maintain a homelike and odor-free environment left residents at risk for an unpleasant living situation, infectious diseases, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident Rooms> Observations on 06/04/2024 at 9:01 AM showed in room [ROOM NUMBER] A had gouges on the wall at the head of the resident's bed and a deep gouge on the bathroom wall. Observations on 06/04/2024 at 8:55 AM showed room [ROOM NUMBER] A had deep gouges on the wall at the head of the resident's bed. Observations on 06/04/2024 at 9:08 AM showed room [ROOM NUMBER] A had gouges on the wall at the head of the resident's bed and had multiple white paint patches on the wall. Observations on 06/04/2024 at 8:44 AM showed room [ROOM NUMBER] with the lower part of the bathroom door had gouges. Observations on 06/04/2024 at 9:20 AM showed room [ROOM NUMBER] with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents and Long-Term Care Ombudsman Office (LTCO) received required written notices at the time of transfer/discharge, or as soon as practicable, for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 48, 64, & 59) reviewed for hospitalization. Failure to ensure a written notification was provided to the resident and/or representative of the reasons for the discharge and in a language and manner the resident and/or representative understood placed residents at risk for a discharge that was not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. Failure to ensure a notification was provided to LTCO of the reason for transfer/discharge prevented the LTCO the opportunity to educate residents and advocate them regarding the discharge process. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility policy, Discharge and Transfer/Washington State revised 02/2016, showed staff should notify the resident and/or representative in writing in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to encode and transmit resident assessment data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) within the required timeframe, for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 6 & 68) reviewed for timeliness in encoding and transmission of Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool). This failure affected federal health information data gathering and placed residents at risk for inaccurate monitoring of the residents' decline or progress over time, untimely comprehensive review of residents' health data/information, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident Assessment Instrument - RAI> According to the October 2023 Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 User's Manual (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents), a discharge (death) MDS assessment must completed within seven days and submitted within 14 days from the date of discharge or death. The manual showed a discharge return anticipated MDS assessment must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) of 3 of 17 residents (Residents 80, 48, & 67) were completed accurately to reflect the resident's condition and overall health status. The facility failed to assess and identify the presence of loose dentures (Resident 80), a fall while in the facility (Resident 48), and a Range of Motion (ROM) limitation (Resident 67). These failures placed residents at risk for aspiration (when food, liquid, or other material enters a person's airway and eventually the lungs by accident), fall triggers, decreased mobility, contractures, unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility policy, Resident Assessment and Associated Processes, revised December 2023, showed residents would be assessed comprehensively and accurately using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual and the findings would be documented in their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive Care Plans (CP) for 2 of 17 residents (Residents 37 & 65) whose comprehensive CPs were reviewed. Failure to develop and implement a CP to address a resident's pain (Resident 37), provided care instructions regarding leg immobilizer device use (Resident 65), and establish individualized CPs with identified goals that accurately reflected the resident's condition placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's Care and Treatment - Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning policy, revised August 2017, showed the interdisciplinary team would develop a comprehensive person-centered CP for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs. <Resident 37> According to a 06/10/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 37 received scheduled pain medication during the assessment period and required additional pain medications for breakthrough pain. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure activity programs met the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 resident's (Residents 2) reviewed for activities. Failure to provide residents with meaningful activities left residents at risk for boredom, frustration, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 2> According to a 05/05/2024 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 2 preferred listening to music, attending group activities, and participating in religious activities. The assessment showed Resident 2 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS showed Resident 2 had diagnoses of dementia, a stroke with left sided paralysis, seizure disorder, depression, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia, a cognitive communication disorder, and a need for assistance with personal care. Review of a revised 05/06/2024 Care Plan (CP) showed Resident 2 was dependent on staff for activities related to their physical limitations. The CP showed Resident 2 would participate in activities five to seven times a week.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 residents (Residents 64 & 59) reviewed for non-pressure skin alterations and 1 of 4 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for constipation were provided quality care and services. The failure to ensure resident skin issues were assessed, treated, and/or monitored, and the failure to initiate facility bowel care protocol left residents at risk for unmet care needs, pain/discomfort from constipation, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's Skin and Wound Monitoring and Management policy, revised December 2023, showed a licensed nurse would assess/evaluate a resident's skin at least weekly and areas identified must be documented in the appropriate weekly assessment form. The policy showed skin monitoring would be captured daily via medication and treatment administration records. <Resident 64> Observations on 06/05/2024 at 11:18 AM, 06/06/2024 at 2:49 PM, and on 06/10/2024 at 10:09 AM showed Resident 64 had multiple scattered dark purple bruises on their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 44, 46, & 67) reviewed for Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) services received the care and services they were assessed to require. These failures placed residents at risk for a decline in Range of Motion (ROM), increased dependence on staff, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy titled, Restorative Care, dated 05/2016, showed restorative care would be provided to each resident according to their individual needs and as determined by the interdisciplinary team. The policy showed documentation of RNP would be in each resident's electronic health record when it was offered, if a resident refused, or when a resident was not available to participate in their RNP. <Resident 44> According to a 03/04/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Resident 44 had no memory impairment. The assessment showed Resident 44 had diagnoses of, but not limited to, depression, generalized muscle weakness, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 37) reviewed for falls. This failure placed residents at risk for potential injuries that could affect the resident's quality of life and safety. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Best Practice Guidelines, dated 03/2016, showed the facility would implement interventions to minimize the potential for injury. This policy showed prevention protocol would be initiated based on each category and individualized plan of care. The policy showed nursing would conduct shift to shift reports with walking safety rounds following report checking on high fall risk residents. <Resident 37> According to a 06/10/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 37 had a history of falls in the last month. The MDS showed Resident 37 had a fall with right hip fracture that required surgical repair. The MDS showed Resident 37 had moderate memory impairment and diagnoses of,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe environment to prevent placing residents at risk for facility acquired infections. The facility staff failed to follow Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) recommendations for 2 (room [ROOM NUMBER] & 325) of 2 rooms on contact precautions reviewed, and ensure indwelling catheter (tubing to facilitate urinary drainage) bags were secured. These failures placed residents at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections and related complications. Findings included . <room [ROOM NUMBER]> Observations on 06/06/2024 at 9:00 AM showed a contact precaution sign outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] that instructed staff to don (apply) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) as follows; don gown, glove, and mask prior to entering room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation and interview on 06/06/2024 at 12:33 PM showed Staff Y (receptionist) and Staff D (MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed processes designed to prevent contamination in food storage and preparation areas for 3 of 4 staff (Staff N- Dishwasher/Tray Prep, Staff M- Dishwasher/Tray Prep and Staff L- Dishwasher/Tray Prep). The failure of staff to 1) always wear a hair restraint, 2) keep personal belongings and personal drinks out of the kitchen, 3) perform hand hygiene, use gloves correctly, dispose soiled paper towels appropriately, 4) use unclean thermometers when checking food temperatures, increased the risk of cross contamination of foodborne pathogens and placed all residents, who consumed food prepared in the facility's kitchen, at risk of food-borne illness and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Hair Restraint> The 10/17/2019 facility policy Food Safety Requirements showed dietary staff must wear hair restraints (e.g., hairnets, hat, and /or beard restraints) to prevent hair from contacting food. Observation in the facility kitchen on 05/16/2023 at 8:45 AM, Staff N came out of the walk-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility administration failed to manage the facility in a way to ensure substantial compliance with federal regulatory requirements. The Administration failed to ensure there was active and engaged oversight and monitoring of systems related to social services, infection control and prevention, Nutrition/Hydration, Quality of care in showers, edema and bowel management, care planning, resident rights, medication services. 1) The failure to employ a qualified social worker to coordinate and oversee resident rights, mental, psychosocial and behavior needs of residents consistent with the person-centered, individualized care plan and, 2) the failure to supervise and ensure nursing staff identified, assessed, developed a comprehensive person-centered care plan, and implemented the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment and plan of care, placed residents at risk for errors in care, inaccurate care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-19 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 6 residents and 1 supplemental resident (Residents 16, 48, 35, and 61) reviewed for Care Plans (CP). The failure to include residents and/or their representatives in development or revising their person-centered CP prevented residents from exercising their right to participate in the development of, being informed of, and request changes in, their individual CP. Findings included . Review of the 02/2021 facility policy titled Resident Participation- Assessment / Care Plans, showed the resident and/or representative had the right to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered CP. The CP included the assessment of resident strengths and needs and incorporated the personal and cultural preferences of the resident when establishing the goals of care. The facility supported and encouraged resident/representative participation in the CP process by holding CP meetings. The social services staff was responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-19 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) assessments for 3 of 20 (Residents 2, 19, and 14) sampled residents. The facility failed to accurately assess physical restraints, active diagnoses, and psychotropic medications which placed residents at risk of having unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Restraints> Review of the 10/2019 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual 3.0 defines Physical Restraints are any manual method, or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. <Resident 2> The 04/16/2023 Annual MDS showed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS showed Resident 2 was assessed to use a restraint daily when in bed. Resident 2's 01/26/2004 Care Plan (CP) for safety showed Resident 2 used a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-19 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a screening process for residents who have indicators of intellectual disability or serious mental illness) assessments accurately reflected residents' mental health conditions for 3 of 7 residents (Residents 6, 33, & 61) reviewed for PASRR. The failure to review and revise PASRR assessments on admission and with a change of mental health condition placed residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate and timely mental health services, not receiving a Level II evaluation if indicated, potential for inappropriate placement, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The 11/19/2019 facility policy Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASRR Program, showed all residents to would be screened with a PASRR Level I assessment for Serious Mental Disorders (SMI). A PASRR Level I-initial pre-screening will be completed prior to admission . a PASRR Level II determines whether the individual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-19 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 1 resident (Residents 61) reviewed for care plans and two supplemental residents (Residents 14 & 62). The failure to complete a baseline care plan and discuss care goals and interventions with residents on admission placed the residents at risk for being uninformed of care provision, complaints regarding care and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the 03/2022 facility policy Care Plans-Baseline, showed the Baseline Care Plan (BCP) was developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission and met the resident's immediate health and safety needs. The BCP included instructions to staff to provide effective, person-centered care and would include the minimum healthcare information to properly care for the resident. The resident and/or their representative were provided a written summary of the BCP that included the stated goals and objectives of the resident's care; a summary of the resident's medications, dietary instructions,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-19 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — pattern
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis. This failure placed residents at risk of having unmet psychosocial needs. Findings included . According to federal regulations, any facility with more than 120 beds must employ a qualified social worker (SW) on a full-time basis. A qualified social worker is defined as an individual with a minimum of a bachelor's degree in social work or a bachelor's degree in a human services field and one year of supervised social work experience in a health care setting working directly with individuals. In an interview on 05/18/2023 at 3:43 PM, Staff A (Administrator) stated the facility did not have a social worker for the past few months, and was trying to hire a social worker. Refer to: F645 PASRR Screening for MD & ID F740 Behavioral Health Services F758 Free from Unnecessary Psychotropic Medications REFERENCE WAC: 388-97-0960. .

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the transfer of trust funds in a resident trust fund occurred within 30 days following death or discharge for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 117 & 118) reviewed for trust fund. The failure to reconcile resident accounts and provide reimbursement to the resident or the State Office of Financial Recovery (OFR), placed resident's funds at risk of misuse and the state department at risk for loss of funds and the interest accumulated. Findings included . <Resident 117> In an interview and record review on [DATE] at 12:37 PM, Staff S (Business Office Manager) provided the [DATE] Trust Fund Balance Sheet. The balance sheet showed Resident 117 had a current balance of $350.00. Staff S stated Resident 117 discharged over 30 days ago and the balance should have been refunded. Staff S stated a refund was not done. <Resident 118> In an interview and record review on [DATE] at 1:55 PM, Staff S reviewed the [DATE] Trust Fund Balance Sheet. The balance sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notices (SNF-ABN) to 2 of 3 residents (Resident 1 & 57) reviewed for beneficiary notifications. The failure to provide residents the information regarding changes in their Medicare services, including potential financial liability and appeal rights, deterred residents from exercising their right to decide on continuation of skilled services and costs associated, as required by the Medicare Program. Findings included . On 05/17/2023 at 9:26 AM, the facility provided the Beneficiary Notice worksheet of residents, discharged in the last six months, who had Medicare benefit days remaining. Staff S (Business Office Manager) was asked to provide the SNF-ABN notices for Residents 1 and 57. No documentation was provided. In an interview on 05/18/2023 at 12:37 PM, Staff S stated the SNF-ABN notifications were provided to residents by the social services staff. Staff S stated since there was no social worker, the business office staff was supposed to notify residents when there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 2 of 3 (Residents 47 & 54) residents. Failure to provide help with bathing to residents who are dependent on staff for assistance, placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, diminished self-image, embarrassment, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 47> The 09/01/2022 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) showed Resident 47 had medically complex diagnosis including an amputation to the left lower extremity, and was assessed to required physical assistance of one staff in bathing. In an interview on 05/18/2023 at 11:58 AM Resident 47 stated they prefer a bath/shower two times a week. Resident 47 stated they only received a bath/shower once a week since their admission. The resident's last shower was on 05/11/23. Review of Resident 47's 04/15/2022 Care Plan (CP) showed preference of bathing twice a week. In an interview on 05/18/2023 at 12:03 PM, Staff B (Regional Nurse Consultant) stated they were not aware of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored and received the treatment they were assessed to require for 2 of 2 (Residents 37 & 54) residents reviewed for constipation and diarrhea and 3 of 4 (Residents 54, 6, & 19) residents reviewed edema (swelling) management. The failure to monitor and implement interventions for bowel and edema management placed residents at risk for pain, decline in medical status, unmet care needs and discomfort. Findings included . <Bowel Monitoring> <Resident 37> The 05/01/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) showed Resident 37 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with complex medical diagnosis including stroke, heart failure, kidney failure, and the inability to move one side or the other. The assessment showed Resident 37 required extensive assistance of two people for toileting and bed mobility. Review of the 05/12/2022 Bowel and Bladder Retraining Assessment showed Resident 37 was incontinent of bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which staff would routinely offer/supply water for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 59 &31). The facility staff's failure to offer residents water routinely placed residents at risk for dehydration and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 59> According to the 05/01/2023 admission/5day Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), Resident 59 admitted with complex medical conditions including a primary diagnosis of bladder infection, high blood pressure, blood sugar disorder, traumatic brain injury, and malnutrition. During interviews on 05/16/2023 at 12:49 PM, 05/17/2023 at 1:02 PM, 05/18/2023 at 9:37 AM, and 05/18/2023 at 1:10 PM Resident 59 stated the staff do not provide residents with water. Resident 59 stated they bought their own water but must ask staff for ice, which is difficult to obtain, the staff tell them that's not their job and to go find a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Observation on 05/16/2023 at 12:49 PM, and 05/18/2023 9:37 AM showed Resident 59 did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with behavioral health needs maintained the highest practicable mental and psychological well-being. The facility's failure to recognize and monitor individualized behavior triggers, implement, assess, and document non-pharmacological (non-medication) interventions to minimize behaviors, develop an individualized behavior Care Plan (CP) based on individual resident needs, and monitor psychotropic medication use with required diagnoses and consent for use, for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 14 & 61) reviewed for behaviors. These failures placed residents, with behavioral needs, at risk for unidentified behavior triggers, unmet behavioral needs, refusal of care, lack of behavioral services and support, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 61> The 04/13/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) showed Resident 61 had diagnoses including anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), adjustment disorder, and attention-deficit hyperactivity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a system to manage drug regimen reviews by the facility pharmacist for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 14) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The failure of the physician to respond timely and implement recommendations by the pharmacist or provide a clinical rationale for not implementing the recommendations, and the failure of the facility to follow up on pharmacist and/or practitioner recommendations, placed residents at risk for unnecessary medications, adverse side effects and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Diagnosis Clarification> Review of the 12/12/2022 physician order (PO) showed Resident 14 was prescribed an antipsychotic medication for behavioral disturbance. Review of the 12/29/2022 Pharmacist recommendation form showed behavioral disturbance was not a supportive diagnosis and recommended an appropriate diagnosis for the antipsychotic medication. The practitioner signed the recommendation form on 01/11/2023, 13 days later, and commented Please FF to MH [Mental Health] provider. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 2 (Resident 35) sampled residents reviewed for insulin administration was free of a significant medication error. The failure to follow the manufacturer's instructions and prime the insulin pen is considered a significant error, as it may result in the resident receiving the incorrect dose of insulin, placing the resident at risk for blood glucose complications. Findings included . Review of the (undated) manufacturer's instructions for the insulin pen used to administer this medication showed the needle unit was to be primed (remove air in the needle) with two units of insulin prior to dialing the dose of insulin to be administered to the resident. Priming of the insulin needle is required to ensure an accurate dose of insulin is administered. <Resident 35> Record review showed Resident 35 had a diagnosis of diabetes with a physician order for Lantus insulin, 8 units, to be administered to the resident. Observation on 05/18/2023 at 2:34 PM, showed Staff H (Registered Nurse) cleaned the top of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene between glove changes, before, after and during wound care for 1 of 3 (Resident 48) sampled residents reviewed for wound care. This failure placed the resident at risk for the spread of infection. Findings included . Review of the 12/10/2022 facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Program, This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections .Standard Precautions .Hand hygiene shall be performed in accordance with our facility's established hand hygiene procedures. <Resident 48> The 03/16/2023 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) showed Resident 48 had no pressure ulcers or skin issues identified. Record review showed a 05/03/2023 Physician Order (PO) to cleanse left buttock open area with normal saline, apply a foam dressing twice daily, apply an ointment to the right buttock,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote antibiotic stewardship by ensuring the appropriate use of antibiotics for 1 of 4 (Resident 315) sampled residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. This failure placed the resident at risk for potentially adverse outcomes. Findings included . According to the 12/2016 facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship, the purpose of their Antibiotic Stewardship Program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in their residents. The admitting nurse reviews discharge and transfer paperwork for the current antibiotic/anti-infective orders when a resident is admitted from an emergency department, acute care facility, or other care facility. The nurse admitting the resident is to check that appropriate indications for use of the antibiotics are included, criteria met for clinical definition of active infection or suspected sepsis, and pathogen susceptibility, based on culture and sensitivity, to antimicrobial (or therapy began while culture is pending).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
PENNANT HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/21/2022
THE ENSIGN GROUP INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/21/2022
BURNAM, SOONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/21/2022
DENOR, JOSEPHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
FARNSWORTH, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/01/2023
KEETCH, CHADIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/01/2011
PORT, BARRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2023
ACTRIV HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2023
EASTSIDE HEALTHCARE STAFFING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2023
JENKINS, TRACYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
SALTWATER HEALTH HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
STANDARD BEARER HEALTHCARE OP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$371K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 7%Other / private 18%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $371K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$477per resident / day
operating cost
$14,490per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$420per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505513. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next