Lynnwood Post Acute Rehabilitation Center
5821 188th Street Southwest, Lynnwood, WA 98037 · For profit - Corporation · 67 certified beds · (425) 776-5512 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.3% | 14.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.6% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 2.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.5% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 0.7% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.0% | 93.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.8% | 22.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.1% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.5% | 82.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.8% | 19.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.9% | 13.4% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 156 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.2%CMS range 45.0–59.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.2–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 71.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 67.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 5.1–14.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 67 beds and averages 61.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse investigations. Resident 2 walked over to Resident 1 and placed their hands and pushed inward around Resident 1's neck. This failure placed residents at increased risk of injury, emotional distress, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .RESIDENT 1Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a required assessment tool) dated 03/29/2026, showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis list that included muscle weakness. The MDS further showed Resident 1 did not have impaired thinking or memory and required assistance for all mobility and transfers.RESIDENT 2Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis list that included anxiety (an emotion characterized by feelings of tension and worried thoughts). The MDS further showed the resident did not have impaired thinking or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-08 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the survey binder included the recertification and complaint survey results that resulted in citations for 2 of 3 years (2024 & 2025), reviewed for availability of survey reports. This failure prevented residents, residents' representatives and visitors from exercising their right to review past survey results and the facility's plan of corrections.Findings included .Review of the Survey Binder, on 07/02/2025 at 2:50 PM and on 07/03/2025 at 10:48 AM, showed that the binder did not contain the recertification and complaint surveys that resulted in citations during the three preceding years. Further review showed the recertification survey results and the associated plan of corrections dated 07/22/2024 and complaint survey results and the associated plans of corrections dated 08/16/2024 and 03/19/2025 were not included in the survey binder.In an interview and joint record review on 07/03/2025 at 11:22 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated that they were responsible for updating the Survey Binder. Staff A further stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement care plans for 4 of 10 residents (Residents 22, 7, 2 & 5) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The failure to develop and/or follow care plans for conducting an assessment, medication use, and splint usage placed the residents at risk of not receiving needed care, decline in condition, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning,” revised in August 2017, showed that the facility interdisciplinary team would develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a residents’ medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. ASSESSMENTRESIDENT 22Review of the comprehensive care plan printed on 07/02/2025 showed that the psychotropic (drugs that affects how the brain works, and causes changes in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate pharmacy services for medication administration and/or disposal for 4 of 6 residents (Residents 40, 6, 162, & 36), reviewed for medication administration and storage. The failure to follow physician's orders and disposal of controlled substances (a drug or other substance that is tightly controlled as it may be abused or cause addiction) placed the residents at risk for medication errors, negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Administration Procedures for all Medications,” dated May 2022, showed the facility policy was, “To administer medications in a safe and effective manner.” The policy further showed staff should review the five rights three times; prior to removing the medication from the cart/drawer check the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the order, and checking prior to removing the medication from the container, and after the dose has been prepared. Review of the facility’s policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring was conducted for use of insulin (medication that lowers the level of glucose [a type of sugar] in the blood) and/or diuretic (medication that reduces fluid buildup in the body and increases urine output) for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 2, 23 & 7), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, related complications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review for the facility’s policy titled, “Administration Procedures for all Medications,” dated May 2022, showed that medications were administered in a safe and effective manner. The policy further showed, “monitor for side effects or adverse drug reactions immediately after administration and throughout each shift.” INSULIN USERESIDENT 2Review of Resident 2’s face sheet printed on 07/01/2025, showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included diabetes (a condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately label and/or dispose expired medications in accordance with current accepted professional standards for 2 of 3 medication carts (Sound Medication Cart & [NAME] Medication Cart) and for 1 of 1 Medication Storage Room, reviewed for medication storage and labeling. In addition, the facility failed to properly store drugs or biologicals (diverse group of medicines made from natural sources) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 50). These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised and ineffective medications. Findings included . Review of the facility’s policy titled, “Medication Storage in the Facility,” dated May 2022, showed that “Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer’s recommendations or those of the supplier.” It showed that “Certain medications or package types, such as…multiple dose injectable vials, ophthalmics [medications for the eyes] …require an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in a dignified manner for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 5), reviewed for dignity. The failure to ensure staff to resident interaction occurred in a respectful and dignified manner placed the resident at risk for diminished self-worth, self-esteem, and feelings of embarrassment.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality of Life-Dignity, revised in August 2009, showed that Residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times. It further showed that Verbal staff-to-staff communication.shall be conducted outside the hearing range of residents and the public.Observation on 07/01/2025 at 8:43 AM, showed Staff N, Registered Nurse, enter Resident 5's room and when exiting, Staff N stated in the hallway, he's [he is] pooping. Further observation showed Staff N entered room [ROOM NUMBER], to tell the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) inside the room, that [Resident 5's name] is pooping and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure evaluation and assessment for safe administration of medications were conducted for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 50), reviewed for self-administration of medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for inaccurate and unsafe medication administration, adverse side effects, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Self Administration of Medications, revised in May 2016, showed that if the resident desires to participate in self-administration, the interdisciplinary team will assess the resident's ability to self-administer medications. The residents' cognitive, communication, visual, and physical ability to carry out this responsibility will be evaluated. If the interdisciplinary team determines that this resident is unable to carry out this responsibility.the interdisciplinary team may withdraw this right. The policy further showed that, if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or Durable Power of Attorney [DPOA] for health care [a document delegating to an agent the authority to make health care decisions in case the individual delegating the authority subsequently becomes incapable to do so]) was obtained for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 37), reviewed for advance directives. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk for losing their right to have their preferences honored to receive or refuse/discontinue care according to their choice.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives and Associated Documentation, revised in December 2023, showed that an advance directive was A written instruction that relates to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated, such as a Living Will, Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care or the Natural Death Act. These documents allow the individual to identify choices related to their medical treatment or designate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a notice before transfer/discharge to the resident and their representative describing the reason for transfer in writing for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 43), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident at risk for not having an opportunity to make an informed decision about transfers and discharge.Findings included .Review of the electronic clinical record (progress notes and miscellaneous/documents tab) showed Resident 43 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident 43's clinical record showed a Nursing Home Transfer or Discharge Notice, dated 06/17/2025, stating the reason for resident transfer/discharge was necessary for their welfare and their needs could not be met at the facility. The notice showed it was provided to Resident 43's representative verbally stating, out of town. Verbal agreement. Further review of Resident 43's clinical record showed no documentation that Resident 43 and their representative had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately for 2 of 10 residents (Residents 23 & 46), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure accurate assessments were coded on the MDS regarding medication use and dialysis (a process of removing excess water and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys [organs that filter blood, remove waste and balance fluids in the body] can no longer perform these functions) placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024, showed, .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations. Those sources must include the resident and direct care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], Intellectual Disabilities [ID]; or related conditions are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care) Level I form was completed accurately and Level II PASARR referrals were made for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 108), reviewed for PASARR screening. These failures placed the resident at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services for their needs and/or lacking access to specialized services for individuals with identified mental health diagnoses or disabilities.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, PASRR screening for Serious Mental Illness/Intellectual Disability, revised on 07/03/2025, showed that It is the policy of this facility to establish a PASRR process to.screen for possible serious mental disorders, intellectual disabilities, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 residents (Residents 109), reviewed for respiratory care. The failure to obtain accurate oxygen orders placed the residents at risk of respiratory related complications and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised in February 2023, showed that It is the policy of this facility that oxygen therapy is administered, as ordered by the physician or as an emergency measure until the order can be obtained. It further showed that the first step for oxygen administration was obtain appropriate physician's order.Review of Resident 109's physician orders showed an order for Oxygen via mask at 3-4 [three to four] LPM [Liters per minute-a unit of measurement] continuously.Observations on 06/30/2025 at 9:01 AM, on 07/01/2025 at 1:55 PM, and on 07/02/2025 at 8:28 AM, showed Resident 109 was receiving six LPM of oxygen via nasal cannula (flexible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was less than five percent (%). The failure to properly administer 3 of 25 medications for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 40 & 6), observed during medication administration resulted in a medication error rate of 12%. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the correct form, dose, and/or receiving less than the intended therapeutic effects of physician ordered medications and possible adverse effects.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Administration Procedures for all Medications, dated May 2022, showed the facility policy was, To administer medications in a safe and effective manner. The policy further showed staff should review the five rights three times; prior to removing the medication from the cart/drawer check the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the order, and checking prior to removing the medication from the container, and after the dose has been prepared.RESIDENT 40 Review of Resident 40's physician orders printed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-precaution to protect residents from multidrug-resistant organism [a germ that is resistant to medications that treat infections]) practices were followed for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 39) and failed to discard a laboratory sample for 1 of 1 discharged resident (Resident 164), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk for infection and related complications.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, IPCP [Infection Prevention & Control Program] Standard and Transmission Based Precautions, revised in October 2022, showed EBP precautions indicated to use gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities. The policy further showed that high-contact resident care activities included dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing briefs or assisting with toileting. Additionally, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and/or their representative about a high carbon dioxide (C02-a form of natural waste produced by the body and breathe out by the lungs) blood test level for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for change in condition. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk of not being provided adequate information to make informed decisions about their medical condition. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Best Practice in Change of Condition and Endorsement, revised in January 2025, showed, Physician, resident, and responsible party will be notified of any changes in resident status or condition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 01/20/2025 showed Resident 1 had intact cognition with diagnosis that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a medical condition that occurs when lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body). Review of a laboratory test results dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) was free from a significant medication error. The failure to provide a medication (Apixaban - used to prevent blood clots) placed Resident 1 at risk for complications with heart disease, a decline in medical condition, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 07/15/2024, showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility from a local hospital on [DATE] with a diagnosis list that included Atrial Fibrillation (or A-fib, a form of an abnormal heartbeat). The MDS also showed the resident had impaired thinking. In an interview on 08/05/2024 at 9:37 AM, Resident 1's Collateral Contact stated that Resident 1 did not receive their heart medication [Apixaban] for a few weeks after admitting to the facility and that they had a heart condition that required the medication to be given twice a day to prevent problems with their heart. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing form was accurately completed for the number of staff worked, actual hours worked and included the census for 30 of 30 days, reviewed for posted nurse staffing information. The failure to post a complete and accurate form daily placed the residents, family members and visitors, at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels. Findings included . Observation on 07/15/2024 at 9:32 AM, showed that the Daily Nursing Staffing Information posting did not include the census and the actual hours worked. The column under Actual Hours worked were the same numbers under the column # [number] Staff. Additional observations on 07/16/2024 at 8:37 AM, 07/17/2024 at 9:08 AM, 07/18/2024 at 8:33 and 07/19/2024 at 8:59 AM, showed that the Daily Nursing Staffing Information posting did not include the actual hours worked. The column under Actual Hours worked were the same numbers under the column # [number] Staff. Record review of the Daily Nursing Staffing Information and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer/discharge notice to the residents and/or representatives for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 45, 47 & 46), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for not having an opportunity to make informed decision about transfers/discharges. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge and Transfer, revised in February 2016, showed that transfer or discharge of a resident will be in writing, in language the resident understands and be given to the resident, resident's surrogate decision maker, if any, and the resident's family. RESIDENT 45 Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 05/19/2024, showed Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the nursing progress note dated 07/12/2024 showed that Resident 45 was sent to the emergency room due to bleeding. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not show documentation that a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-22 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed hold (the opportunity to pay for the bed the resident currently occupied while out of the facility in order to ensure their bed/room was available when they are ready to return) notices were offered to residents and /or their representatives for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 45, 47 & 46), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk for unwanted, avoidable room changes upon readmission, and frustration. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed-Hold, revised in December 2023, showed that the resident or their representative shall be informed in writing of their right to exercise the bed hold provision in the event of a transfer from the facility to a general acute care hospital or at the start of a resident's therapeutic leave. The policy further showed that the notice shall include the duration of the State bed hold policy (if any) and /or of the facility's policy that the resident's bed will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (an alerting device for staff to assist residents in need) was within reach for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 102), reviewed for accommodation of needs. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed care, accidents/falls, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Call Light/Bell, revised in May 2007, showed, Place the call device within resident's reach before leaving room. Review of the admission minimum data set (an assessment tool) dated 07/07/2024, showed Resident 102 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Observations on 07/16/2024 at 8:33 AM and at 12:18 PM, showed Resident 102's call light was on the floor next to their bed. Observation on 07/16/2024 at 12:19 PM, showed Staff O, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), entered Resident 102's room and asked the resident if they needed help with their meal. The call light was still on the floor when Staff O exited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or Durable Power of Attorney [DPOA] for health care) was obtained from the resident and/or their representative and ensure a copy was readily available in the medical records for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 37 & 102), reviewed for advance directives. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to refuse/discontinue medication for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 253). These failures placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk for losing their right to have their preferences honored to receive or refuse/discontinue care according to their choice. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives, revised December 2023, showed that Advance Directive is a written instruction that relates to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated, such as a living will, DPOA for health care. These documents allow the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify, initiate, thoroughly investigate, and promptly resolve a grievance for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 17), reviewed for grievances. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievances, revised in March 2019, showed, Resident and/or Resident Representatives have the right to file grievances orally or in writing. It further showed that grievance forms are available and are to be initiated when concerns are made. Review of the facility's policy titled, Personal Inventory/Missing Items, revised in May 2017, showed a grievance form will be filled out and processed for all non-theft/non abuse allegations. Review of the annual minimum data set (an assessment tool) dated 05/05/2024, showed that Resident 17 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. It further showed that Resident 17 was dependent for transfers and used a manual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a written summary of the baseline care plan was provided to the residents and/or their representatives for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 49 & 102), reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, revised in December 2023, showed, within 48 hours of the resident's admission, the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan that includes instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care. The policy further showed, the facility team would provide a written summary of the baseline care plan to the resident and their representative and would be provided by the time of the completion of the comprehensive care plan. The comprehensive care plan is developed within seven days of completion of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice to ensure 2 of 2 licensed staff (Staff P & Staff F) observed for medication administration followed medication administration practices regarding unlabeled and undated medication at a resident's bed side and pain medication patch application. These failures placed the residents at risk for possible medication errors, potential negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, revised in January 2018, showed, when the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated and the nurse shall place a 'date opened' sticker on the medication and enter the date opened. It further showed that the medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Review of the facility's policy titled, Specific Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete required annual performance evaluations for 1 of 3 staff (Staff J), whose personnel files were reviewed for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) performance evaluations. Failure to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews, placed residents at risk for receiving care from underqualified nursing staff and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of Staff J, CNA, personnel file on 07/17/2024 showed that they were hired on 07/23/2018 and transferred to the facility on [DATE]. The facility was not able to provide documentation that an annual performance evaluation was completed as required. On 07/18/2024 at 1:57 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing, stated that staff performance evaluations were completed yearly. Staff B stated that they were new to the facility and that they thought it was unfair for them to evaluate staff when they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medication was disposed of timely in accordance with current accepted professional standards for 1 of 2 medication carts (Cascade Hall Cart) and the facility failed to appropriately label and store drugs or biologicals (diverse group of medicines made from natural sources) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 20) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised and ineffective medications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage In The Facility, revised in January 2018 showed that medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. It showed that certain medications or package types, such as IV solutions, multiple dose injectable vials, ophthalmics, nitroglycerin tablets, blood sugar testing solutions and strips, once opened, require an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and infection control practices were followed during meal tray pass for 2 of 7 staff (Staff O and Staff G), failed to ensure Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-special equipment worn to protect from germs) protocols were followed for 1 of 3 staff (Staff G), and failed to ensure medical equipment was disinfected between resident use for 1 of 2 staff (Staff H) reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk for infection and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Hand Hygiene, showed, the facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. It further showed to sanitize hands with alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water before and after direct contact with residents and after contact with objects in the immediate vicinity of the resident. HAND HYGIENE/MEAL TRAY PASS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal vaccine (used to prevent pneumonia [a lung infection]) and influenza vaccine (used to prevent influenza [an infection of the nose, throat, and lungs]) were provided for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 34) reviewed for immunizations and infection control. This failure placed residents at risk of acquiring, transmitting, and/or experiencing potentially avoidable complications from pneumococcal and/or influenza disease. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Immunizations-Residents, revised in July 2023, showed, It is the policy of this facility to offer and administer influenza, pneumococcal .immunization to eligible residents. It further showed, Residents admitted late in the influenza season [typically February or March] should be offered the influenza vaccine as late season outbreaks do occur. Review of the face sheet printed on 07/24/2024, showed Resident 34 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used personal protective equipment (PPE - gloves, N95 respirator/mask, gown and face shield/goggles), perform hand hygiene, and follow infection control precautions during COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death) outbreak in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for 2 of 10 staff (Staff E & F), and failed to report COVID-19 outbreaks to the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) as required for 2 of 3 COVID-19 outbreaks (August 2023 and December 2023), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk of infection and related complications. Findings included . According to the CDC guidance, How to use Your N95 Respirator, updated on 03/16/2022, N95 masks must form a seal to the face to work properly. The document showed the mask should be placed with the top strap pulled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance for bathing/showering for 1 of 5 residents (Residents 3), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, poor hygiene, skin impairment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, revised on July 2015, showed that when developing plans of care for ADLs, ascertain individual's resident preferences to ensure the interventions are personalized to ensure such things as day/time/type of bathing and any other ADL/quality of life choice that is important to the resident. Additionally, it showed that nursing assistants will assist with ADL based on the resident's individualized plan of care. Resident 3 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 3's ADL care plan dated 09/15/2023, showed Resident 3 required one-person maximum assistance with bathing. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written abuse policies and procedures related to allegations of abuse for 1of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience on-going abuse, harm, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A review of the facility's policy titled, Policy/Procedure-Abuse Prevention/Investigation, revised on 04/2019, showed as soon as a report of alleged or suspected abuse is received, the investigation shall begin in order to rule out or identify abuse. Further review of the policy showed the investigation will be completed in five days. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment (a required assessment tool) dated 08/15/2023 showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and required assistance with all care and mobility. Review of Collateral Contact 2's (CC2) written report dated 11/03/2023 showed Resident 1 reported they were touched inappropriately, and it made them…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse was reported to the State Agency within the required timeframe for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse allegations. This failure placed the resident at risk for potential unidentified abuse and lack of protection from abuse. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy and procedure for Abuse Prevention and Investigation, revised on 04/2019, showed employees are mandated reporters and are required to report to the State agency. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Collateral Contact 2's (CC2) written report dated 11/03/2023, showed Resident 1 reported they were touched inappropriately, and it made them feel uncomfortable. Resident 1 also said an unknown staff member that worked at the facility threw them on the floor. Further review of CC2's written report showed CC2 notified the Director of Nursing Services (Staff A) of Resident 1's abuse allegations that day. Review of the November…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse investigation. This failure placed the resident at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified abuse, and inappropriate corrective actions. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention and Investigation, revised on 04/2019, showed that as soon as a report of alleged or suspected abuse is received, the investigation shall begin in order to rule out or identify abuse. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Collateral Contact 2's (CC2) written report dated 11/03/2023, showed Resident 1 stated that they were touched inappropriately and was thrown on the floor by an unknown staff member in the facility. Further review of CC2's written report showed that Staff A, Director of Nursing, was informed of what Resident 1 had stated to CC2. Review of the September 2023 to November 2023 Incident log, did not show that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were followed according to professional standards of practice for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 1, 3, 2 & 4) reviewed for respiratory care. The failure to transcribe and/or follow physician's orders for respiratory care, routinely change oxygen tubing, and initiate/review respiratory care plans placed the residents at risk of unmet care needs, respiratory infections, and related complications. Findings included . Review of the Oxygen Administration policy dated 07/2019, showed that oxygen therapy is administered as ordered by the physician and oxygen tubing is to be replaced every seven days or when visibly soiled. PHYSICIAN ORDER FOR USE OF OXYGEN RESIDENT 1 Review of the physician/transfer orders dated 07/20/2023, showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility that day with a diagnosis that included chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (a buildup of carbon dioxide in the blood). The transfer orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-12 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were developed within 48 hours of admission to ensure continuity of care and/or to ensure a summary/copy of the baseline care plan was provided to the residents and/or their representatives for 5 of 9 residents (Residents 412, 112, 562, 312 & 313) reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure resulted in the residents not being informed of their initial plan for delivery of care services and placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Baseline Care Plan revised in May 2021 showed that within 48 hours of the resident's admission, the facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan that includes instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care. The policy also showed that facility team will provide a written summary of the baseline care plan to the resident or resident representative. RESIDENT 412 Resident admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label and store medications (no open date or not dating medications after opening it) and failed to ensure expired medical supplies were disposed of timely in accordance with current accepted professional standards for 2 of 2 medication carts (Sound & Cascade Medication Carts) and 1 of 1 medication storage room observed. These failures placed the residents at risks of receiving compromised medical supplies and experience adverse side effects. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Medication Storage Policy/Procedure, revised in [DATE] showed, The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. Review of the undated Advair manufacturer's instructions showed to Safely throw away ADVAIR DISKUS in the trash 1 month after you open the foil pouch on when the counter reads zero, which ever comes first. SOUND…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen thermometer was properly sanitized between use for 1 of 1 kitchen. This failure placed the residents at risk for cross contamination, food borne illnesses [an illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages], and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A joint observation with Staff E, Dietary Manager, on 04/10/2023 at 11:19 AM, showed, Staff P, Cook, took temperature of prepared foods for the lunch meal. Staff P cleaned/sanitized the kitchen thermometer with a new alcohol wipes before checking the temperature of the meat spaghetti sauce and then cleaned/sanitized the thermometer with the same alcohol wipes. Staff P then checked the temperature of the steamed vegetables, chopped spaghetti noodles mixed with meat sauce, chicken noodle soup, and white steamed rice using the same alcohol wipes when sanitizing the thermometer in-between these food items. Staff P then cleaned/sanitized the thermometer using a new alcohol wipe. On 04/10/2023 at 11:30 AM, Staff P stated that they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's order and complete a self-medication administration assessment for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident 112) reviewed for medication at the bedside. The failure to complete a self-administration assessment and obtain a physician's order placed the resident at risk for medication errors and adverse medication interactions. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications revised May 2016 showed that if a resident desires to participate in self-administration, the interdisciplinary team will assess the resident ability to self-administer medications. If the resident is a candidate for self-administration of medications, a physician's order will be obtained. Resident 112 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included unspecified asthma (a chronic disease in which the airways in the lungs become narrowed and swollen, making it difficult to breathe). Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the Advance Directive (AD) was obtained from the residents/representatives who have an AD in place and ensure a copy was readily available in the medical records for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 18) reviewed for advance directives. This failure placed the resident at risk of losing their right to have their preferences and choices honored regarding emergent and end-of-life care situations. Findings included . An advance directive (AD) is a written instruction, such as a living will (LW) or durable power of attorney (DPOA), relating to the provision of health care when an individual is incapacitated. Review of the facility policy titled, Advance Directives, revised in November 2016, showed that Prior to, upon, or immediately after admission, the admission Nurse or Social Services will ask residents, and/or their family member, about the existence of any advance directives. Should the resident indicate that he or she/has issued advance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a timely significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 9 residents (Residents 47) reviewed for significant change in status assessment. The failure to complete a significant change in status assessment within 14 days placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) dated October 2019, under Section 5.2 Timeliness Criteria, showed Significant Change in Status Assessment must be completed no later than 14 days from the Assessment Reference Date or ARD (A2300) and no later than 14 days from the determination date of the significant change in status. A significant change means a major decline in status that will not normally resolve itself without further intervention by staff or by implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions, which has an impact on more than one area of the resident(s)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 1 of 15 residents (Resident 313) reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. The failure to ensure accurate assessments for pressure injury placed the resident at risks for unidentified or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.17.1, dated October 2019: Accuracy of Assessment means that the appropriate, qualified health professionals correctly document the resident's medical, functional, and psychosocial problems and identify resident strengths to maintain or improve medical status, functional abilities, and psychosocial status using the appropriate RAI (i.e., comprehensive, quarterly, annual, significant change in status). The Observation Period (also known as the Look-back period) is the time-period over which the resident's condition or status is captured by the MDS assessment and ends at 11:59 PM on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents consistently received bathing/shower and personal hygiene per their plan of care for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 4 and 112) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This failure placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, decreased self-esteem, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy for ADLs, revised in July 2015 showed, Nursing assistants will provide assistance with ADL's based on the resident's individualized plan of care .ADL support and resident performance will be documented electronically using Point of Care (POC) .If a resident chooses to decline an intervention in the plan of care, the licensed nurse and social services will be notified. The IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] will review the plan of care with the resident in an effort to find alternative means to address the need. RESIDENT 4 Resident 4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident-centered care and treatment were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice when facility staff failed to do skin evaluations, implement monitoring and interventions for skin care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 25) reviewed for skin conditions. Additionally, the facility failed to assess and maintain weight-bearing restrictions for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 44) reviewed for limited mobility and positioning. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of care. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Skin Care Policy/Procedure, revised in June 2016 stated that all residents will have a head-to-toe skin check performed weekly by a licensed nurse. The license nurse should document the findings. Any skin issues identified on the weekly skin check should be documented and responded to. Additionally, it stated that Licensed nurse should document skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper care of nebulizer tubing/mouthpiece (a type of equipment used to deliver a medicine into a fine mist that is breathed in) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 4) reviewed for respiratory care. The failure to ensure nebulizer tubing/mouthpiece were replaced and/or stored properly when not in use placed the resident at risk for respiratory infections and related complications. Findings included . Resident 4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a lung disease where the small airways in the lungs are damaged causing shortness of breath [SOB]). Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 01/06/2023 showed Resident 4 had impaired cognition and required one-person extensive assistance for activities of daily living. Review of Resident 4's April 2023 Medication Administration Record showed the following: Albuterol Sulfate (a drug used to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing form was accurately posted and updated with actual hours worked for each shift for 30 out of 30 days reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This failure placed the residents, the residents' representatives, and visitors at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels and census information. Findings included . Observations on 04/05/2023 at 8:25 AM, 04/06/2023 at 8:01 AM and 04/07/2023 at 8:34 AM, showed the facility's daily nursing staffing form located on the wall to the right of the main entrance did not display the actual nursing staff hours worked for previous shifts. Observations on 04/10/2023 at 3:15 PM, 04/11/2023 at 3:00 PM and 04/12/2023 at 2:00 PM, the facility's daily nursing staffing form located on the wall to the right of the main entrance did not display the actual nursing staff hours worked for previous shifts. Review of the daily nursing staffing information form from 03/08/2023 to 04/09/2023 had no actual and/or total hours worked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review of room size measurement, two single resident rooms (Rooms 17 & 18) failed to meet the minimum room size requirement of at least 100 square feet (sq ft - unit of measurement) for a single resident room. The failure to ensure residents reside in rooms which met the regulatory requirements for square footage, placed them at risk for living in a physical environment too small to meet their needs.Findings included .Review of an undated and untitled facility provided document showed the following rooms square feet measurements were:-room [ROOM NUMBER]- 93.2 sq ft-room [ROOM NUMBER]- 92 sq ftReview of the facility's census dated 06/30/2025, showed rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were occupied with residents.RESIDENT 28During an interview and observation on 06/30/2025 at 3:03 PM, Resident 28 stated that their room size did not bother them. Observation showed Resident 28 was in room [ROOM NUMBER] and was not found to be negatively impacted by their room size.RESIDENT 41During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review of room size measurement, two single resident rooms (Rooms 17 & 18) failed to meet the minimum room size requirement of at least 100 square feet (sq ft) for a single resident room. The failure to ensure residents reside in rooms which met the regulatory requirements for square footage, placed them at risk for living in a physical environment too small to meet their needs. Findings included . Square footage: -room [ROOM NUMBER]- 93.02 sq ft -room [ROOM NUMBER]- 92.03 sq ft Review of the facility's census dated 07/17/2024, showed rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] were occupied with residents. RESIDENT 32 In an interview and observation on 07/17/2024 at 9:28 AM, Resident 32 stated that the room size did not bother them. Observation showed Resident 32 was in room [ROOM NUMBER] and was not found to be negatively impacted by their room size. RESIDENT 41 In an interview and observation on 07/17/2024 at 9:38 AM, Resident 41 stated that they don't care about their room size.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-04-12 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death) vaccination policy and procedures and failed to implement their policy for 1 of 2 staff (Staff N) reviewed for COVID 19 vaccination. In addition, the facility failed to have a process for documenting for whom the facility had granted, an exemption from the staff COVID-19 vaccination requirements. These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at risk for COVID-19 and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Vaccine, Staff COVID-19 last updated in October 2022 showed, Staff who request a religious exemption, an exemption request shall be made on the facility's Vaccine Reasonable Accommodation Request Form and submitted to the Human Resources/payroll Representative or Administrator . Staff who have not completed their primary vaccination series to use a NIOSH [National…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-04-12 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review of room size measurements, 2 single resident rooms failed to meet the minimum room size requirement of at least 100 square feet (Sqft2) for a single resident room. These rooms were room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]. Findings included . Square footage: room [ROOM NUMBER] - 93.2 Sqft2 room [ROOM NUMBER] - 92.0 Sqft2 room [ROOM NUMBER] and 18 were occupied by a resident during the facility's recertification survey. The residents in these rooms were screened during the survey and were not found to be negatively impacted by their room size. On 04/07/2023 at 1:09 PM, Staff G, Plant Operations Manager, said that there was no change made to these rooms' square footage since the last recertification survey. On 04/07/2023 at 2:35 PM, Staff A, Administrator, confirmed there was no change made to these rooms' square footage since the last recertification survey and acknowledged that the rooms listed above did not meet the required room measurement per the federal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARETRUST GP LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 06/01/2006 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/09/2024 |
| HOLMES, NATHAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| STOLARCZYK, LISA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/21/2024 |
| FARNSWORTH, STEPHEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2006 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/26/2018 |
| SATO, AMI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/01/2006 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2006 |
| TEMPAY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2006 |
| FISHER, TONYA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| CTR PARTNERSHIP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2006 |
| SNOHOMISH HEALTH HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $933K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505434. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.