Greentree Health and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 37.0 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R86) of 1 sampled resident was transferred appropriately and in accordance with the facility's policy. On 4/5/25, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-K transferred R86 without a gait belt. R86 fell during the transfer and sustained a head injury that required 3 staples. Findings include: The facility's Safe Resident Handling/Transfers Policy, revised 12/2024, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to ensure residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure, and comfortable experience for the resident while keeping employees safe in accordance with current standards and guidelines .All residents require safe handling when transferred to prevent or minimize the risk for injury to themselves and the employees that assist them .Compliance Guidelines: 1. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) or designee will evaluate and assess each resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of physical abuse for 2 residents (R) (R1 and R2) of 3 sampled residents. On 7/24/25 at approximately 6:30 AM, R1 put R1's arms around R2's neck, pulled R2 toward R1, and pinched R2's ear. Staff stated R2 appeared upset and did not want the interaction to occur. Staff did not report the abuse until another incident occurred that afternoon. Findings include:Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention policy, dated 7/2024, indicated it is the policy of the facility that each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. This includes, but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II referral was completed after a significant change in mental status for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 1 resident reviewed. A psychiatric evaluation on 7/23/25 indicated R1 had self-injurious behaviors and hit/pinched others. The evaluation contained recommendations to increase R1's divalproex (anticonvulsant medication) and quetiapine (antipsychotic medication). A PASARR Level II referral was not completed.Findings include:Review of the facility's Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program policy, dated 7/24, revealed the facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Any Level II resident who experiences a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 39 residents residing in the facility. Enhanced Barrier precautions (EBP) were not implemented for R187 who had an indwelling urinary catheter. Staff did not complete appropriate hand hygiene after providing care for R6. Residents were not offered hand hygiene prior to the lunch meal on 4/22/25. Finding includes: The facility's ICPC Standard and Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) policy, dated 2/2025, indicates: .Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP): Expand the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for indirect transfer of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to staffs' hands and clothing then indirectly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record, review, the facility did not maintain dignity for 3 residents (R) (R20, R11, and R6) of 23 sampled residents. R20 required feeding assistance. On 4/22/25, R20 watched other residents eat in the dining room and waited 16 minutes for assistance. In addition, staff in the dining room did not address or speak to R20. R11 and R6 required feeding assistance. On 4/22/25, staff in the dining room did not speak to R11 and R6 while feeding them. Findings include: The facility's Meal, Preparing Resident for policy, dated 5/2024, indicates: It is the policy of this facility that the primary purpose of preparing the resident for a meal is to serve the meal in a pleasant environment and to make the mealtime a pleasant event. Encourage residents to eat in the dining area. This provides each resident with an opportunity to socialize and make new friends . The facility's Dietary Support Personnel, Sufficient policy, dated 1/2022, indicates: .Sufficient support personnel means having enough dietary and food nutrition staff to safely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure court-ordered protective placement was obtained for 1 resident (R) (R9) of 2 sampled residents. R9 was under Guardianship. The facility did not ensure court-ordered protective placement in the least restrictive environment was obtained after R9's nursing home stay exceeded 60 days. Findings include: From 4/21/25 to 4/23/25, Surveyor reviewed R9's medical record. R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including schizophrenia, epilepsy, and major depressive disorder. R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/15/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 out of 15 which indicated R9 was unable to complete the interview. R9 had a Guardianship that was activated on 9/29/21. R9's medical record contained a petition for protective placement that was dated 8/22/24. On 4/23/25 at 9:12 AM, Surveyor reviewed R9's medical record with Social Worker (SW)-P who confirmed the petition for protective placement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not make a prompt effort to investigate and resolve a grievance for 1 resident (R) (R5) of 1 sampled resident. R5 voiced a concern to staff and the Grievance Official that another resident repeatedly woke R5 up in the early morning hours. R5's grievance was not documented, thoroughly investigated, or resolved. Findings include: The facility's Resident and Family Grievances Policy, revised 12/2024, indicates: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's .right to voice grievances without discrimination or fear of reprisal .Prompt efforts to resolve include facility acknowledgment of a complaint/grievance and actively working toward resolution of the complaint/grievance .1. The Social Worker has been designated as the Grievance Official. 2. The Grievance Official is responsible for overseeing the grievance process, receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion, leading any necessary investigations by the facility,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported to the State Agency (SA) for 1 resident (R) (R32) of 4 sampled residents. On 4/2/25, staff discovered a hematoma on R32's left forearm. Facility staff and Hospice staff were unsure how the injury occurred. The facility did not report the injury of unknown origin to the SA. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention policy and procedure, updated 7/2024, indicates: Identification of abuse - Identify events, such as but not limited to suspicious bruising of residents, occurrences, patterns, and trends that may constitute abuse; and to determine the direction of the investigation. All alleged violations will be reported via phone or in writing within 2 hours to the State Licensing Agency. The facility shall follow up with the State Licensing Agency in writing the findings and results of the completion of the investigation within 5 days . From 4/21/25 to 4/23/25, Surveyor reviewed R32's medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated for 1 resident (R) (R32) of 4 sampled residents. R32 had an injury of unknown origin that was discovered on 4/2/25. The facility did not interview other residents to rule out abuse during the investigation. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention policy and procedure, updated 7/2024, indicates: Identification of abuse - Identify events, such as but not limited to suspicious bruising of residents, occurrences, patterns, and trends that may constitute abuse; and to determine the direction of the investigation. The investigation shall consist of: .6. Interviews with other residents to whom the accused employee provides care or services. From 4/21/25 to 4/23/25, Surveyor reviewed R32's medical record. R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, adult failure to thrive, and palliative care. R32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not revise a care plans in accordance with current care needs for 1 resident (R) (R32) of 15 sampled residents. R32's care plan was not updated to include calling R32 by R32's preferred names. R32's care plan was also not updated when R32 incurred an injury of unknown origin and geri-sleeves were implemented to protect R32's skin. Findings include: From 4/21/25 to 4/23/25, Surveyor reviewed R32's medical record. R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia, adult failure to thrive, and palliative care. R32's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/5/25, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15 which indicated R32 had severely impaired cognition. R32 had an activated Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC). On 4/21/25 at 1:15 PM, Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-C who indicated when R32 was first admitted , staff called R32 by a shortened version of R32's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 residents (R) (R7, R12, and R186) of 17 sampled residents received assistance as needed to complete activities of daily living (ADLs). R7 did not receive assistance with positioning, toileting, and breakfast. R12 did not receive weekly showers. In addition, the facility did not address R12's request for more showers. R186 did not receive a shower while at the facility. Findings include: The facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) policy, dated 12/2024, indicates: Care and services will be provided for the following ADLs: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care; 2. Transfer and ambulation; 3. Toileting; 4. Eating to include meals and snacks .3. A resident who is unable to carry out ADLs will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene .5. The facility will maintain individual objectives of the care plan. The facility's Resident Showers policy, dated 12/2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $416K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI