Wood Aven Health and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 71.3 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.16 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.31 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident (R) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 out of 18 residents sampled. (R321) R321 has a history of daily opiate use and constipation. The facility bowel protocol was not followed or a thorough GI assessment completed, causing actual harm to R321. R321 was hospitalized with severe pain and was admitted with a fecal impaction. Findings include: The facility's bowel protocol, reviewed on 11/18/24, includes, in part: Bowel and Bladder Management . Bowel: Constipation (If no bowel movement in > 48 hours; Perform steps sequentially) -Perform rectal check to determine if impaction is present - Encourage 2,000 ml daily fluid intake unless contraindicated -Consult Dietician for dietary recommendations -Sennoside 8.6 mg take 2 tablets by mouth at evening prn for 3 days -Bisacodyl suppository 10 mg per rectum daily prn for 3 days - Reattempt Sennoside or Bisacodyl if no results after 24 hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed for medication errors (R2). R2 received Metformin (a medication to treat diabetes) for 8 days. R2 does not have a diagnosis of diabetes.Findings: R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia and chronic kidney disease. R2 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7/15 which means severe cognitive impairment. R2 has a legal representative for health care decision making. R2's care plan, last revised 01/26/2025, with a target date of 01/27/2026, states: At risk for impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought process. Interventions include.review medications and record causes of cognitive deficit: new medications. R2's record review indicated the following:- Physician order dated 10/29/2024 to check R2's HgbA1c level (a blood test that measures an average blood sugar level over the past 2-3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-01 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 4 of 5 residents (R1, R8, R19, and R67) or their representatives received the proper notice of transfer, reason for transfer, and ombudsman notification.-Facility did not have a specific reason for the transfer notice for R1, R8, R19, and R67.-Facility did not notify the ombudsman of R8, R19, and R67's transfers to the hospital.Findings include: Surveyor reviewed policy titled, Criteria for Transfer and Discharge, dated 12/25 last reviewed, .Procedure: 5. If the transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the residents' needs cannot be met in the Facility, the resident's physician shall document in the resident's medical record: a. The specific residents need that cannot be met . Surveyor reviewed policy titled, Transfer and Discharge (including AMA), dated 03/26, .3. The facility's transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the residents and residents representative in a language and way they can understand. The notice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not determine if self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for 1 resident (R7) out of 3 residents reviewed for self-administration of medications in a sample of 17 residents. The facility did not ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assessed and determined R7 was clinically appropriate to self-administer prescription topical creams and inhalers, located in R7's room and at bedside. This could result in an adverse event happening because of R7 incorrectly self-administering medications. Findings include:The facility policy, titled Self-Administration of Medications, last revised 03/2026, states, . a resident's cognitive, communication, visual, and physical ability to carry out this responsibility will be evaluated quarterly and as needed.if the resident is a candidate for self-administration of medications, this will be indicated in the medical record.resident's care plan will be updated to reflect self-administration.R7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not notify the provider of changes in condition for 1 of 17 residents (R19) reviewed.This is evidenced by:The facility's Standing Orders, most recently reviewed and approved by the Medical Director on 03/05/26, states, Please follow these standing orders unless otherwise indicated by healthcare provider. Provider Notification: Systolic Blood Pressure less than 90 or greater than 200.R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cognitive communication deficit, acquired absence of right leg above knee, chronic kidney disease stage 3.R19's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/18/26, noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating cognition intact.Surveyor reviewed R19's vital signs:*10/24/25, R19's blood pressure (BP) was documented as 83/50. No provider notification of systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 90 was noted.*10/25/25, R19's BP was documented as 87/56. No provider…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility did not implement policy and procedures related to screening employees for a prior history of abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, or misappropriation of resident property for 2 of 8 employees reviewed. -The facility did not ensure their abuse policy was implemented when two employees' Background Information Disclosures (BID) did not include results from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Integrated Background Information System (IBIS) before Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) P and Facility Driver O started working for the facility. Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention reads in part, . Employee Screening . 2. All employees will be properly screened for criminal background.On 04/01/26 at 10:14 AM, Surveyor reviewed 8 random staff's BID.1. On 04/01/26 at 10:32 AM, Surveyor interviewed Regional Human Resource K and asked if facility had CNA P's DOJ and IBIS forms completed when facility ran CNA P's background on 11/01/24. Regional Human Resource reported that when the company took over last year, they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 out of 4 residents (R44).Staff transferred R44 with the incorrect mechanical lift resulting in a fall after Occupational Therapy (OT)'s recommendations for transfer were ordered. R44's care plan was not updated with transfer changes in a timely fashion.Findings include: Facility policy titled, Safe Resident Transfer Program, dated reviewed on 03/26, states: .Steps for Program use: #1. All transfers will be indicated in the care plan. 6. Staff always have the option of using higher level of transfer assist, if in their judgement, the residents condition warrants it; for example, a resident normally uses Ez-Stand but suddenly is unable to bear weight, then a full body lift should be used. Facility policy titled, Fall Prevention, dated reviewed on 11/24, states in part: .Procedure: A care plan is formulated based on the fall risk assessment. If a potential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident who is continent of bladder on admission receives services and assistance to maintain bladder function as possible for 1 of 5 residents (R54). The facility did not ensure an accurate bowel and bladder assessment completed upon admission to determine an appropriate toileting program or plan in place to manage current urinary status or regain/maintain urinary continence status. The facility policy titled Bowel and Bladder Assessment last revised 03/26 states: It is the policy of this facility to provide the resident who is incontinent of bowel and/or bladder the appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore as much normal bladder function as possible. Under the section titled Purpose states: The purpose of the bowel and bladder evaluation is to develop an individualized, goal-oriented approach to elimination. Under the section titled Procedures states in part: 1. The Bowel and Bladder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who were fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 2 of 2 residents (R10 and R55).The facility's policy and procedure included a method that is no longer recognized as a nationally accepted standard of practice. Staff were unable to provide a reference to a nationally recognized standard of practice used to develop their policy and procedure. Facility staff were observed using auscultation as it may not provide accurate results. R55 and R10's tube placement was checked using auscultation. This is evidenced by: Facility's policy titled, Gastrostomy Tube Care and Management, with a reviewed date of 03/2026, states in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide proper care and maintenance of gastrostomy tubes. Procedure: 4. Before every feeding, verify the tube position.check the position every shift and as needed using aspiration of gastric contents, air auscultation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors for 1 of 17 residents (R55) R55 was not administered medication for bowel regimen based on physician orders. R55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dysphagia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS,) pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. R55's physician orders dated 03/24/2026 state: Metamucil Oral Powder 48.57 % (Psyllium) Give 1 Tbsp via PEG-Tube one time a day for loose stools mixed in 4-8 ounces free water. R55's record shows last bowel movement was documented on 3/28/26 at 19:45 7:45 PM of incontinent small formed soft/normal stool. On 03/31/2026 at 8:41 AM, Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D set up R55's medications which included order for Metamucil. LPN D measured 1 tablespoon of Metamucil and placed it into a 30cc medication cup and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 3 of 17 sampled residents (R7, R43, and R31). Staff did not implement enhanced barrier precautions for R7 and R43. Staff did not perform hand hygiene during R31's medication administration.The facility policy, titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 03/24/2026, states, Initiation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), the facility will have the discretion in using EBP for residents who do not have a chronic wound.an order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following: wounds (chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers.) even if a resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a methicillin drug resistant organism (MDRO).make gowns and gloves available immediately near or outside the resident's room. Example 1 R7 was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $739K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI