No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Atkins Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

605 Northwest 7th Street, Atkins, AR 72823 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (479) 641-7100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (479) 641-7100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 14 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
106 Weir Rd Ste 4 · (479) 567-5652 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1601 N Church St # B · (479) 641-7878 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
805 N Church St · (479) 641-2832 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.1%9.5%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.1%4.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.2%10.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.7%21.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine48.4%96.1%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.6%13.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.3%10.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine20.0%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.5%24.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.7%12.5%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.5%CMS range 41.2–71.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 6.6–17.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified85.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting65.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
1.32
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
53.1%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 49.1 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.24 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.20 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-16)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and interviews it was determined the facility failed to send a written notice of transfer or discharge to the Ombudsman for one (Resident #59) of one resident, upon discharge. The findings include: Review of Resident #59's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #59 on 02/10/2026 from a local hospital. Review of Resident #59's Medical Diagnosis report revealed Resident #59 had diagnoses which included acute kidney failure, encephalopathy, hypothyroidism, dementia, hypertension and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #59's discharge, return anticipated Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/12/2026 revealed the discharge status was discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. The MDS coded the discharge as a planned discharge. Review of Resident #59's Care Plan dated 02/12/2026 revealed Resident #59 wished to discharged . Review of Resident #59's Progress Notes dated 02/12/2026 at 10:57 PM revealed Resident #59 had discharged to a local rehab. Review of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling catheter was stored off the floor to reduce the risk of infection, cross contamination and injury for one (Resident #3) of one resident reviewed. The findings include:Review of Resident #3's Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident #3 had diagnoses which included urine retention, overactive bladder, chronic kidney disease, tubulointerstitial nephritis (inflamed kidney tubules) and anxiety.Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/30/2026 revealed, Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed Resident #3 had a catheter and had not had a UTI in the last 30 days. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan revealed Resident #3 had potential/actual impaired skin integrity related to catheter, poor mobility, and use of anticoagulant with an initiated date of 03/31/2026. Care Plan interventions included to keep the residents' nails short, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hot foods were served hot to maintain palatability and encourage adequate nutritional intake for 1 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. On 10/14/24 at 11:12AM, Resident #51 stated food is cold when served. 2. On10/15/24 at 8:11 AM, a food cart that contained 8 meal trays for breakfast was delivered to the 500 Hall by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3. At 8:22 PM, the temperature of the food items on the last resident tray, was taken and read by the District Dietary Manager. The temperatures were as follows: a. Scrambled eggs - 98 degrees Fahrenheit. b. Sausage - 84 degrees Fahrenheit. c. Pan cake - 100 degrees Fahrenheit. d. Gravy - 102 degrees Fahrenheit. 3. On 10/15/24 at 8:11 AM, the first breakfast meal tray for the 300 Hall was placed in an unheated food cart in the hall outside the kitchen window by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4, who left it open while loading the meal trays. When the staff began removing the meal trays, there were 7 trays in the food cart to be delivered to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary employees washed their hands or changed gloves before handling food items and clean equipment when contaminated; expired food products were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria. The findings are: 1. On 10/14/24 at 9:42 AM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #1 wore gloves on her hands while using scissors to cut open a bag of shredded cheese which contaminated the gloves. Without washing her hands, she removed shredded cheese from the bag and sprinkled it on top of enchiladas to be baked and served to the residents for lunch. 2. On 10/14/24 at 9:52 AM, an opened box of fish was on a shelf in the walk-in refrigerator. The box was not covered or sealed 3. On 10/14/24 at 9:56 AM, the following observations were made in the storage room: a. One box with 24 count of probiotics drink, was on a shelf with an expiration date of 10/6/2024. b. On bag of butter fingers was on a shelf with an expiration date of 6/19/2024. c. One…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure lint traps for two of two dryers located in the facility laundry room were cleaned to prevent the potential for fire hazard. The findings are: During a tour of the facility laundry room on 10/16/2024 at 9:04 AM, two clothing dryers used to launder resident clothing were observed. The Housekeeping/Laundry Supervisor was asked to provide the surveyor with access to the dryer's lint traps. The lint trap of one dryer was found to contain what appeared to be five white pieces of paper, a dryer sheet, and a buildup of lint. The lint trap of the second dryer contained what appeared to be ten dryer sheets and a buildup of lint. During an interview on 10/16/24 at 9:04 AM, the Housekeeper/Laundry Supervisor explained that the lint area of dryers are cleaned every hour. Upon further observation of the dryer lint traps, it appeared to not be cleaned recently in either dryer. The Housekeeper/Laundry Supervisor explained that laundry was told to clean the lint screens every hour instead of every two hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained while performing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for 1 resident (Resident #56) of 1 receiving incontinent care. Findings included: 1. Review of a facility policy titled, Resident Rights, (not dated), indicated, Each resident has the right to be treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of dignity and individuality. Review of an admission Record, indicated Resident #56 was admitted with a diagnosis of dementia and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/8/2024 revealed Resident #56 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, which indicated Resident #56 was moderately cognitively impaired. On 10/15/2024 at 07:14 AM, observed Certified Nursing Assistants #6 and #7 performing incontinent care on Resident #56 without pulling the privacy curtain. On 10/15/2024 at 9:50 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #6 was asked if the privacy curtain should have been pulled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment was completed within 14 calendar days from the determination that a significant change has occurred for one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for assessments. The findings are: Upon review of the residents admission Record, it showed Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of encephalitis (inflammation of the brain). The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 07/25/2024 documented the resident scored 03 (0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status. Upon review of Resident #2's (R#2) scanned documents, hospice care was ordered on 5/11/24. Upon review of all completed MDS assessments, R#2 did not have a significant change in status MDS comprehensive assessment completed within 14 calendar days following readmission on [DATE]. On 10/16/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and document review, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to reflect the resident's needs, and failed to ensure it was accurate to represent the resident's current health status for one resident (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The findings are: On 10/14/2024 at 12:55 PM, observed Resident #2 (R#2) sitting in a geriatric chair in the designated dayroom/dining area for the memory unit with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #10 assisting R#2 with lunch. CNA #10 continued to offer each bite of food, and each drink of fluid to R#2. After the meal, CNA #10 was interviewed regarding care for R#2. When asked how much assistance R#2 requires for during meals and for fluids, and she confirmed R#2 requires full assistance with all food and drinks. Upon review of the residents admission Record, it showed Resident #2 (R#2) was admitted on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions to reduce the potential risk of infection for 1 (Resident #41) sampled resident who was reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The findings are: Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #41 was admitted with a diagnosis of pressure ulcer of right heel, stage 3 (Stage 3 pressure ulcers involve full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon, or muscle is not exposed). The quarterly 5 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/13/2024 revealed Resident #41 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #41's care plan, completed 8/21/2024, revealed the resident had a stage 3 pressure ulcer to the right foot. Interventions included but were not limited to: Low Air Loss Mattress to bed for pressure relief as tolerated. Ensure functional and operational and encourage good nutrition and hydration in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure leftover food items were used to maintain food quality; 1 ice machine and 1 scoop holder were maintained in clean and sanitary condition to prevent contamination of airborne particles; foods stored in the dry storage area refrigerator, and freezer were covered, and sealed to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen, expired food items were promptly removed from stock to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meal trays from I of I kitchen; failed to ensure foods were dated the day received to assure first in, first out usage to prevent potential for food bone illness; dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; cold foods on ice were maintained at a temperature at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit while awaiting service to prevent potential bacteria growth; hot food items on the steamtable were maintained at a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Observation, Interview and Policy Review the facility failed to remove expired medications from 1 of 2 medication carts. The Findings include: On 9/6/23 at 2:15 PM observed the following medications on medication cart # 2. a. one vial of Novolin R insulin with an opened date of 6/3/23. b. one Albuterol Inhaler with an opened date of 7/21/03. c. one ProAir Inhaler with an opened date of 7/2/23. d. one Albuterol Inhaler with an opened date of 6/13/23. e. one Albuterol Inhaler with an opened date of 10/31/22. f. four bottles of Artificial Tears with an opened date of 6/20/23, 7/20/23, and 7/26/23 and 1 was not dated. g. one bottle of Dorzolamide eye drops with an opened date of 7/28/23. h. one bottle of Timol Eye drops with an opened date of 7/27/23. i. one Albuterol Sulfate Inhaler with an opened date of 6/15/23. j. one bottle of Latanoprost eye drops with an expiration date of 6/30/23. k. one bottle of Xalatan eye drops not dated. l. one bottle of Latanoprost eye drops with an opened date of 4/21/23. During an interview on 9/6/23 at 2:40 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 2 meals observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 12 residents who received pureed diets and 13 residents who received mechanical soft diets and 33 residents who received regular diets from 1 of 1 kitchen, according to a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 09/06/2023 at 9:00 AM. findings are: 1. The menu for the dinner meal showed the residents who received pureed diets were to receive 2 #8 scoop (1 Cup) of fish sandwich with 2 slices of cheese, residents on mechanical soft diets were to receive 3 ounces of hamburger patties with 2 slices of cheese and residents on regular diets were to receive 2 slices of cheese. 2. On 8/05/23 at 3:28 PM during the supper meal preparation Dietary Employee (DE) #4 placed 4 breaded fried fish cod pieces into a blender, ground and poured it into a pan. He covered the pan with foil and placed it in the oven to be served to 13…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 12 residents who received pureed diets, as documented on the list Dietary Supervisor provided by the Food Service Supervisor on 09/06/2023 The findings are: On 09/05/23 at 11:48 AM, the following observations were made on the steam table: a. A pan of pureed potato salad was on the cold side of the steam table. The consistency of the pureed potato salad was lumpy and was not smooth. Pieces of potatoes were visible in the mixture. b. A pan of pureed barbeque chicken was on the steam table. The consistency of the pureed barbeque chicken was lumpy and not smooth. On 09/05/23 at 12:55 PM The surveyor asked Dietary Employee (DE) #3 to describe the consistency of the pureed foods served to the residents on pureed diets. She stated, pureed barbeque chicken has little pieces of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and mask were properly changed and bagged in a closed container to prevent infections for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident # 8) who had a physician's order for the use of a CPAP. The findings are: On 9/05/23 at 11:22 AM Resident #8 was sitting in the resident room with a CPAP on the bedside table with no date on the tubing. The tubing and mask were not bagged. On 9/06/23 at 10:56 AM, observed the mask and tubing on a bedside table. The CPAP was not bagged or dated. On 9/06/23 at 3:35 PM observed the CPAP was not in a bag or dated and the mask was lying on the bed. Review of a Physician's order dated 8/13/23 for Resident #8 showed the oxygen tubing for the CPAP machine to be changed every Sunday night. Review of a care plan with an initiated date of 6/30/23, for Resident #8 for oxygen therapy showed the Resident wears CPAP at night, and the nurse to assist with putting it on at night and removing it in the morning. On 9/7/23 at 8:30 AM Certified Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.6+1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alma Nursing and RehabAlma, AR 1 of 5Jamestown Nursing And Rehab, LLCRogers, AR 2 of 5Apple Creek Health And Rehab, LLCCenterton, AR 2 of 5Belvedere Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, LLCHot Springs, AR 2 of 5Colonel Glenn Health And Rehab, LLCLittle Rock, AR 2 of 5Highlands Of Bella Vista Health & Rehab, LLCBella Vista, AR 2 of 5Innisfree Health And Rehab, LLCRogers, AR 2 of 5Robinson Nursing And Rehabilitation Center LLCNorth Little Rock, AR 3 of 5Aspen Health and RehabBroken Arrow, OK 3 of 5Bradford House Nursing and Rehab, LLCBentonville, AR 3 of 5Briarwood Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, INCLittle Rock, AR 3 of 5Brooken Hill Health And Rehab, LlcFort Smith, AR 3 of 5Eufaula Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterEufaula, OK 3 of 5Hickory Heights Health And Rehab, LlcLittle Rock, AR 3 of 5Lake Hamilton Health And RehabHot Springs, AR 3 of 5Quapaw Care And Rehabilitation Center LLCHot Springs, AR 3 of 5Russellville Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRussellville, AR 3 of 5Sherwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, IncSherwood, AR 4 of 5Ashton Place Health And Rehab, LLCBarling, AR 4 of 5Cabot Health And Rehab, LLCCabot, AR 4 of 5Chapel Ridge Health And RehabFort Smith, AR 4 of 5Cherokee County Nursing CenterTahlequah, OK 4 of 5Dardanelle Nursing And Rehabilitation Center,incDardanelle, AR 4 of 5Heather Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHope, AR 4 of 5Johnson County Health And Rehab, LLCClarksville, AR 4 of 5Lakewood Health And Rehab, LLCNorth Little Rock, AR 5 of 5Greenbrier Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterGreenbrier, AR 5 of 5Greystone Nursing And Rehab, LLCCabot, AR 5 of 5Hampton Place Healthcare, LLCRogers, AR 5 of 5Legacy Heights Nursing And Rehab, LLCRussellville, AR 5 of 5Lonoke Health And Rehab Center, LLCLonoke, AR 5 of 5Nursing And Rehabilitation Center At Good ShepherdLittle Rock, AR 5 of 5Oak Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center INCBooneville, AR 5 of 5Perry County Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPerryville, AR 5 of 5Salem Place Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, INCConway, AR 5 of 5Shiloh Nursing And Rehab, LLCSpringdale, AR 5 of 5Superior Health & Rehab, LLCConway, AR

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MORTON, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/24/2006
CLOUD, AMBERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/13/2026
PUGH, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/10/2024
ATKINS NURSING PROPERTY INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2024
CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
NURSING CONSULTANTS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+14.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 4%Other / private 25%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$287per resident / day
operating cost
$8,712per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$334per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arkansas
$7,452/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,060/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,637/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045339. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next