Oak Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 57.1 residents a day — about 48% occupied, or roughly 63 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.92 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-04-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent during the medication administration observation for two (Residents #57 and Resident #60) of four residents. This surveyor observed 31 opportunities for medication administration and four of the 31 medications were not administered in accordance with the Physician's Orders, resulting in a medication error rate of 12 percent. The findings include: Resident #57 Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/23/2026 for Resident #57 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated Resident #57 was cognitively intact. On 04/16/2026 at 11:47 AM, after preparing medications for Resident #57, this surveyor observed LPN #8 administer Resident #57's oral medications with a cup of water. LPN #8 sanitized her hands, donned a pair of gloves and administered one drop from a small bottle of eye medication into…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nurse Aid (CNA #1) followed the Care Plan for the safety of one (Resident #3) of one resident whose Care Plans were reviewed. Specifically, the resident was transferred by one staff member instead of the required two, resulting in a fall. The findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #3 with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure (CHF), peripheral vascular disease, difficulty walking and history of falling. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/10/2025, revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 3 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #3 required partial/moderate assistance for shower/bathing and was dependent on staff for tub/shower transfers. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan initiated on 03/24/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to discard 3 expired medications from 1 of 2 medication carts observed for medication labeling and storage standards. Findings include: 1. A policy was requested related to dating multi-dose medication and expired medication. Facility had no policy related to these items. a. During an observation and interview on 09/04/2024 at 9:32 AM, three expired medications were found in the Northwest cart. One bottle of multi vitamins expired 06/2024, one vial of fiber laxative expired 08/2024 and one vial of a fast acting insulin with an opened date of 08/01/2024. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 stated nurses are responsible for making sure medication are removed before it expires, and insulin should be discarded 28 days after opened and dated. b. During an interview on 09/05/2024 at 9:41 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility utilized the 28-day rule with opened multi use medications and the nurses are responsible for checking the medication in the carts daily for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a safe manner in order to prevent foodborne illness by not cleaning the deep fryer and grease traps. The findings are: On 9/03/2024 at 11:02 am, during the initial tour of the facility kitchen, the grease traps were pulled out by the Dietary Manager (DM) and they were covered in aluminum foil that had a dark brown substance with small light brown pieces of crumbs, along with hollow tubular shaped noodles about an inch and a half long, that were light brown in color, but black on top. On 9/03/2024 at 11:04 am, the DM was asked to open the lid on the deep fryer. Inside the deep fryer was dark brown colored liquid with a large number of small round crumbs gathered on top and around the edges of the fryer. On 9/03/2024 at 11:05 am, the DM said that the grease traps and fish fryer are cleaned every two weeks. On 9/05/2024 at 7:50 am, the DM said that grease traps and fish fryers should be cleaned often to keep from attracting bugs and keep the residents from getting sick from a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the walk-in refrigerator, the refrigerator/freezer in the Medication Room on the South Hall, the Nourishment Room on the Unit, and the Dry Storage Room were dated, labeled, and discarded promptly; kitchen appliances on the shelf below the deep fryer (can opener) and the ceiling vent were maintained in clean sanitary conditions for food preparation; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded by the expiration or use by dates; foods were dated when received to assure first in, first out usage; dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items; and hot food was maintained at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit on the steam table while awaiting service to prevent potential food borne illnesses for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practices had the potential to affect 56 residents who received meal trays from the kitchen (total census: 56), as documented on a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 08/10/23 at 10:33 AM. The findings. 1. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure signs containing resident care instructions were posted in a manner to provide privacy and dignity for 2 (Resident #35 and #44) of 6 (Residents #22, #24, #33, #35, #44 and #50) sampled residents who had a low air loss mattress as documented on a list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 08/08/23 at 2:10 PM, and staff members sat at eye level when assisting residents with meals for 1 (Resident #53) of 2 (Residents #33 and #53) sampled residents who required assistance with meals as documented on a list provided by the Administrator on 08/10/23 at 8:36 AM. The findings are: 1. Resident #35: a. On 08/07/23 at 11:06 AM, Resident #35 was lying in bed on a low air loss mattress. A sign on the wall over the bed read, Reusable incont [incontinent] pads are not to be used on this resident while on low air loss mattress - Tx [treatment] nurse. b. On 08/08/23 at 8:23 AM, Resident #35's room had a sign on the wall over the bed that read, Reusable incont pads are not to be used on this resident while on low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were trimmed, smooth, clean, and free of jagged edges to promote good personal hygiene and grooming for 1 (Resident #37) of 29 (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #9, #11, #14, #19, #22, #24, #26, #30, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #40, #41, #42, #44, #47, #48, #49, #50, #53 and #55) sampled residents who were dependent for nail care as documented on a list provided by the Administrator on 08/10/23 at 8:14 AM and facial and nose hair was removed to promote good personal hygiene and grooming for 1 (Resident #53) of 22 (Residents #2, #3, #4, #11, #14, #19, #22, #26, #30, #32, #33, #35, #37, #38, #40, #41, #42, #44, #49, #50, #53 and #55) sampled residents who were dependent for shaving as documented on a list provided by the Administrator on 08/10/23 at 8:00 AM. The findings are: 1. Resident #37: a. On 08/07/23 at 10:49 AM, Resident #37 was lying in bed. The fingernails on both hands were approximately 1/8 inch past the fingertip with a brown substance under them. b. On 08/08/23 at 8:27 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Physician Orders were followed for 1 (Resident #47) of 4 (Residents #19, #26, #47 and #50) sampled residents with orders for daily dressing changes. The findings are: 1. On 08/07/23 at 10:50 AM, observed a mesh dressing to Resident #47's right foot. The Surveyor asked the resident the reason for the bandage on his right foot. Resident #47 stated, I have a sore on my foot and the doctor said I have a bacteria on my toe. a. Resident #47's Physicians Orders dated 07/19/23 documented .Clean ulcer to right foot with wound cleanser, pat dry apply Santyl Ointment, cover with ABD [abdominal pad] and wrap with [Brand gauze] daily. Every day shift . b. Resident #47's August 2023 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) had blanks on August 3rd and August 6th for the ordered dressing change. The July 2023 TAR had a blank on July 26th for the ordered dressing change. 2. On 08/07/23 at 3:33 PM, observed the dressing on Resident #47's right foot did not have a date on it. 3. On 08/08/23 at 2:55 PM, the Surveyor asked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing, nasal cannulas, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) tubing, nebulizer tubing and mouth pieces/mask were properly changed, dated, and bagged in a closed container to prevent infections for 3 (Residents #11, #32 and #50) of 7 (Residents #1, #11, #32, #33, #36, #40 and #50) sampled residents who had a Physician Orders for respiratory treatments. The findings are: 1. Resident #11: a. On 08/07/23 at 10:23 AM, observed Resident #11's oxygen tubing draped over the handle of a wheelchair and lying on the floor. b. On 08/07/23 at 12:15 PM, observed Resident #11's oxygen bag and tubing hanging on the back of her wheelchair, not dated. Resident #11 stated she was on oxygen all the time. c. On 08/07/23 at 3:31 PM, observed Resident #11's oxygen bag and tubing hanging on the back of her wheelchair with the tubing lying on the floor, not dated. d. Resident #11's Physicians Order for documented, change O2 [oxygen] tubing, clean filter and O2 cabinet, date all tubing every Sunday night on 11-7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 6 residents who received pureed diets, and 20 resident who received mechanical soft diets from 1 of 1 kitchen (total census: 56) according to a list provided by the Dietary Supervisor on 08/10/23 at 10:33 AM. The findings are: 1. On 08/09/23, the menu for the supper meal documented residents who received mechanical soft diets were to receive 3 ounces of cheeseburger and residents on pureed diets were to receive 2 #8 (4 ounces) scoops of pureed cheeseburger. 2. On 08/09/23 at 3:20 PM, the following observations were made during the supper meal preparation: a. At 3:20 PM, Dietary Employee (DE) #3 placed 11 servings of hamburger patties topped with a slice of cheese into a blender and ground. She poured the ground patties into a large bowl. b. At 3:22 PM, DE #3 placed 15 more servings of hamburger patties topped with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR