Robinson Nursing And Rehabilitation Center LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 25 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 88.6 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident Assessment and Minimum Data Set [MDS] were coded correctly to ensure residents were provided with individualized treatment plans and goals for six (Resident #1, #31, #45, #51, #67, and #79) of six residents reviewed.The findings include:Resident #31Review of the admission Record for Resident #31 revealed the facility admitted Resident #31 with diagnoses that included fracture of left patella, sprain of anterior cruciate ligament of left knee, effusion, pain, hypertension, anxiety, and diabetes mellitus.Review of end of PPS Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed this was Resident # 31's most recent MDS.Review of a Progress Note dated [DATE] indicated Resident #31 discharged to a nursing home closer to family.During an interview on [DATE] at 3:12 PM, MDS #2 reported that Resident #31's most recent resident assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's status. She indicated that Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident who had not been assessed to safely self-administer medications was not left alone while receiving medications via nebulizer for one (Resident #100) of one resident reviewed. The findings include:A review of facility policy Medication, General Administration of item 1. Stated Drugs and biologicals may be administered only by licensed physicians, licensed registered or practical nursing personnel, or other personnel wo are duly authorized to perform such services under state law. Item 9. Self-administration of drugs is permitted when approved by the interdisciplinary team and with a physician's order. A review of Resident #100 Medical record did not show an assessment for self-administering of the nebulizer/breathing treatment.A review of Resident #100 Care Plan does not identify the resident to receive Nebulizer treatments.During a concurrent observation and interview on 06/03/2026 9:45 AM, this surveyor observed Resident #100 receiving a breathing treatment. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed within 14 days from the effective date of hospice service election for one (Resident #84) of four residents reviewed.The findings include:Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS's) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual version 1.20.1 dated October 2025, revealed a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) is required when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program, or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home. The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice service election.Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #84 on 10/11/2024 with diagnoses that included malignant melanoma of skin.Review of Resident #84's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 01/20/2025 for [name of hospice] to eval [evaluate] and admit.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet one (Resident #100) of one residents reviewed. Specifically, the resident's care plan did not identify the resident as receiving medications via nebulizer (a medical device that turns liquid medication into a breathable mist, delivering it directly to the lungs). The findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #100 had diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, acute embolism and thrombosis, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, tachycardia, depression, anxiety disorder, and edema. Review of Resident #100's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS did not indicate Resident #100 received oxygen therapy. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was revised to include the signs, symptoms, and adverse reactions staff were to monitor for related to the use of a diuretic medication for one (Resident #84) of one resident reviewed. The findings include: Review of Resident #84's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #84 on 10/11/2024 with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/15/2026, revealed Resident #84 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #84 was taking high-risk drugs including a diuretic. Review of Resident #84's Care Plan with a last reviewed date of 04/17/2026, revealed Resident #84 was on diuretic therapy related to kidney failure. Interventions included to administer diuretic medication as ordered by the Physician and monitor for side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for a sensor device to check blood sugar results was placed on the physician orders and the medication administration record of a resident's electronic health record for one (Resident #99) of one resident reviewed. The findings include: Review of Resident #99's admission Record revealed that the facility admitted the resident on 06/11/2024 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/21/2026, revealed Resident #99 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of a Care Plan with a revised date of 03/20/2026, revealed that Resident #99 was resistant to care as evidenced by refusing blood sugar checks and that Resident #99 refused finger pricks in the event the sensor device to check blood sugar results was not available. Review of Resident #99's Order Summary Report June 2026, did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a written plan of care included both the most recent hospice plan of care and a description of the services provided by the long-term care (LTC) facility to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (Resident #84) of one resident reviewed. The findings include: Review of the admission Record for Resident #84 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/11/2024 with diagnoses that included malignant melanoma (cancer) of skin. Review of Physician's Orders for Resident #84 revealed an order dated 01/20/2025 for [name of hospice] to eval [evaluate] and admit the resident. There was no information in the orders to indicate the diagnosis for admission to hospice services or contact information for the hospice agency. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/15/2026, revealed Resident #84 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 07, which indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal hygiene, as related to proper nail care, was not provided to residents who were dependent on nail care for 2 (Residents #83 and #87) of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. The findings include: 1. A. Review of Resident #83 ' s Care Plan identified: i. Resident needs secured/special care neighborhood due to behaviors/psychosocial/dementia/ other psychiatric issues, initiated: 07/22/2024. ii. Resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit, initiated: 02/27/2024. iii. Resident has potential/actual impairment to skin integrity r/t (related to) fragile skin, incontinence of bowel and bladder, Dx (Diagnoses) of: Dementia, schizophrenia, and iron deficiency anemia. Initiated: 10/15/2024. B. Review of Resident #83 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated Dec. 5, 2024, reflects resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 which indicated Resident #83 had severe cognitive impairment. C. MDS dated Dec. 5, 2024, reflected Resident #83 to have diagnoses of:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #11) of 1 sampled resident ' s wheelchair was in good working condition. The findings are: A review of an Order Summary Report indicated that Resident #11 had diagnoses of type 2 diabetes and restless legs syndrome, and a physician ' s order for Apixaban, an anticoagulant medication used to treat and prevent blood clots, with common side effects that include bleeding. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/05/2024, revealed Resident #11 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS revealed Resident #11 used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of Resident #11's Care Plan, revised 11/10/2024, revealed the resident had potential for skin tear and bruising related to fragile skin, and long-term use of anticoagulants. On 1/06/25 at 11:05 AM, Resident #11 indicated that the wheelchair was digging into her legs. She indicated that when she moves around in her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident on 2 liters of oxygen had a physician ' s order for oxygen therapy to ensure resident received the appropriate and safe dosage of oxygen therapy affecting 1 (Resident #37) of 1 resident sampled for oxygen therapy. Findings include: 1.Review of Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident #37 had diagnoses of atrial flutter, opioid dependency, and diabetes. a. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/04/2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15(13-15 suggest cognitively intact). MDS section C0110, C1 indicated Resident #37 was receiving supplemental oxygen. b. Review of a policy titled Oxygen Safety, with a revision date 11/22/2016, revealed that oxygen therapy is administered only upon a written order of a licensed physician. c. On 01/06/2025 at 3:06 PM, Resident #37 was observed on 2 liters of oxygen via nasal cannula (LNC). d. On 01/07/2025 at 2:22 PM, Resident #37 ' s oxygen concentrator was set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR