Lonoke Health And Rehab Center, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 65.5 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.44 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set (MDS) accurately reflected on section A1500 the preadmission screening and assessment resident record (PASRR) a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability affecting 2 (Residents #4 and #44) sampled residents with a level II PASRR. The findings are: 1. Review of the Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident #4 has a diagnoses of respiratory failure, schizophrenia, and psychotic disorder. a. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/19/2024 suggested a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact). b. Per record review on 07/23/24 at 10:00 AM, the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) from 02/19/2024, section A1500 revealed resident does not have a mental health or intellectual disability, and admission MDS with an ARD of 06/07/2016 showed Resident #4 has a level II PASRR. c. On 07/24/24 at 8:25 AM, LPN #14/ MDS Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 2 (Resident #26 and #44) of 3 sampled residents to ensure residents received appropriate care. The findings are: 1. A review of medical diagnosis revealed Resident #44 had diagnoses of major depressive disorder, bipolar, and schizophrenia. a. The Quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/11/2024 suggested a brief interview for mental status (BIMs) score of 4 (0-7 indicates severe cognitive impairment). b. A review of a Physicians Order dated, 02/06/2024 Novolin R Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Regular (Human) Inject subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime related to type II diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia c. A review of a Physicians Order dated, 03/04/2024 Trulicity Subcutaneous Solution Pen-injector 1.5 MG/0.5 ML (Dulaglutide) Inject 1 dose subcutaneously one time a day every Monday related to type II diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. Leave needle inserted for 5 to 10 seconds until hear 2nd click. d. During an interview with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to properly lift and lower residents with the legs open on a mechanical lift for 1 (Resident #28). The findings are: 1. Record review of Medical Diagnosis for Resident #28 revealed diagnoses of polyneuropathy, heart failure, and major depression disorder. a. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/18/2024 suggested a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 (13-14 indicates cognitively intact). Section GG0110 does not indicate resident requires a mechanical lift, and the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 07/19/2024 is not complete. b. A review of Care Plan for Resident #28 indicated, .Resident #28 has an ADL self-care performance deficit related to unsteadiness on feet (Revised, 05/06/2024) . TRANSFER: The resident requires Mechanical Lift .with 2 staff assistance for transfers . c. On 07/22/2024 at 12:31 PM, Resident #28 was observed resting in a lift pad hoovering above the bed in a mechanical lift with the lift's legs in the closed position. Certified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that 2 (Resident #14 and #17) sampled resident received peri care in a manner that was sanitary to promote good hygiene and/or prevent infection. The findings include: 1. A review of Medical Diagnosis revealed Resident #17 had a diagnosis of dehydration and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection. a. A review of Resident #17's Care Plan (revision date 03/30/2023) revealed the resident had bowel and bladder incontinence related (r/t) immobility. b. A review of Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/24/2024 revealed Resident #17 scored 15 indicating cognitive intact and Resident frequently had urinary incontinence and always incontinence of bowel. c. On 07/23/2024 at 1:05 PM, the Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 and #2 did not use proper technique while providing perineal care to Resident #17 and did not use supplies in the correct manner to promote cleanliness. d. On 07/23/2024 at 1:50 PM, CNA #2 voiced she did not know if she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the physician ordered rate for 2 (Resident #26 and #50) residents to prevent respiratory complications. The findings include: 1. A review of Medical Diagnosis for Resident #26 reveals diagnoses of stroke, metabolic encephalopathy, and anxiety. a. The significant Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference (ARD) date of 06/18/2024 with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 00 (0-7 suggest severe cognitive impairment). Section O0110 showed resident is on oxygen. b. A review of the Order Summary reveals .dated, 06/28/2024 Oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. c. On 07/22/2024 at 12:11 PM, Resident #26 was observed on 3 liters of oxygen. d. On 07/22/2024 at 2:45 PM, Resident #26 observed resting quietly on 3 liters nasal cannula. e. On 07/23/2024 at 11:48 AM, the Surveyor observed oxygen concentrator was set on 3 liters. f. On 07/23/2024 at 11:54 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #17 accompanied the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed ensure the system used for records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation was implemented for one (Resident #33) sampled resident. The findings include: A review of diagnosis Resident #33 had a diagnosis of chronic pain. A review of the physician's orders Resident #33 had an order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10-325 milligram (MG) an opioid used to manage pain. A review of Resident #33's Care Plan (revision date 11/23/2020) revealed Resident #33 had a diagnosis of chronic pain, and behaviors were potentially present when the resident has a higher level of pain. A review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 05/18/2024 revealed Resident #33 scored 11 on Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderately impaired cognition, and Resident #33 was taking a medication classified as an opioid. On 07/23/24 at 10:06 AM, the Surveyor completed a random reconciliation of controlled medications with Licensed Practical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written quantified recipe and menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 2 of 2 meals observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 10 residents who received pureed diets and 17 residents who received enhanced food diets from 1 of 1 kitchen according to a list provided by the Dietary Manager on 07/23/2024 at 1:33 pm. The findings are: 1. The menu for lunch documented the residents who received pureed diets were to receive 1 #8 scoops (1/2 cup) of vegetable blend, #16 scoop (1/4 cup) of pureed bread, #8 scoop (1/2 cup) of pureed cake, #8 scoop (1/2 cup) of strawberry topping. 2. The menu for breakfast 07/23/2024 documented that residents who received pureed diets were to receive pureed purred hot cereal, #16 scoop (1/4 cup) of pureed biscuit/toast. 3. On 07/22/2024, the facility recipe for angel food cake puree documented for 10 residents: use 10 squares 2/3 inches, 1.25 cup 2% milk, 2 tablespoons and 1.5 teaspoons of food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the nutritive value and flavor that were acceptable to the residents to improve palatability and encourage good nutritional intake during 1 of 1 meal observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 9 residents who receive pureed meal trays from 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: 1. On 07/22/2024 the facility recipe for angel food cake puree documented for 10 residents: use 10 squares 2/3 inches, 1.25 cup 2% milk, 2 tablespoons and 1.5 teaspoons of food thickener. Note states: amount of thickener required may vary relative to liquid content of cooked product. For best results, alternate adding thickener with processing, checking product consistency periodically. A) On 7/22/2024 at 11:18 AM, Dietary [NAME] #3 placed 13 pieces of angel food cake into blender. Dietary [NAME] #3 added half and half to the angel food cake in blender, without measuring half and half. Recipe calls for 1.25 cup of 2 milk and 2 tablespoons + 1.5 teaspoons of thickener. When…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 9 residents who received pureed diet. The findings are: The following observations were made during lunch and breakfast meal services. 1. On 07/22/24 at 11:18 AM, Dietary [NAME] #3 placed 13 small pieces of cake (1 inch each) and added 6 spoons of strawberries, 1/2 cup of thickener and purred. At 11:20 AM, another 1/2 cup of thickener was added and pureed. At 11:22 AM, Dietary [NAME] #3 used number 10 scoop to scoop pureed desert into 11 bowls. The consistency of pureed desert was thick with pieces of strawberries throughout. 2. On 07/22/24 at 11:53 AM, Dietary [NAME] #3 used #10 to place 6 servings of vegetable blend with plenty of juice into blender, added two cups of tap water, added 1/4 cup of thickener, pureed. Added another 1/4 cup of thickener and pureed. At 11:55 AM, she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dirty trash cans were stored away from the food storage racks to prevent potential cross contamination, to ensure the ice machine and ice scoop were maintained in clean and sanitary condition to prevent potential growth of harmful bacteria that could be transferred to the residents food, failed to ensure opened food items in the refrigerator, freezer, and storage room were covered, sealed, and dated to maintain freshness and prevent potential cross contamination, that expired food items foods were promptly removed from stock to maintain freshness and prevent potential cross contamination, failed to ensure dietary staff practiced good hand washing techniques to potential cross contamination of food and clean dishes, and failed to ensure hot food item was maintained at the required temperature on the stove and serving line to prevent potential foodborne illness. This failed practice had the potential to affect 71 residents who…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR