Aspen Health and Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 305 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 177 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 112.8 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.04 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.45 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 04/01/25 at 9:18 a.m., an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect. A nurse's statement, dated 03/27/25 at 11:15 p.m., showed Resident #1 reported to RN #1, CNA #1 on the evening shift was mean and hurt them. Resident #1 reported CNA #1 threw them on the bed hard enough to make the bed move and hurt them every time CNA #1 was their aide. Resident #1 reported CNA #1 had been hurting them for a while and they were afraid to report it because they were afraid CNA #1 would get meaner. RN #1 documented Resident #1 broke down into tears crying and asked to keep CNA #1 out of their room. On 03/31/25 at 11:39 a.m., Resident #1 stated the incident on 03/27/25 made them feel abused in a way. Resident #1 then stated to the surveyor, on 03/30/25 on the night shift, when they called for assistance to the restroom, CNA #2 told them to just go in your brief because they could not lift them to take them to the restroom due to having a bad back. Resident #1 stated CNA #2 changed their brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a resident's care plan for dementia for 1 (#14) of 23 sampled residents reviewed for dementia. Findings: An undated care plan policy, read in part, Facility will develop and review the care plan of each resident .the IDT team will develop and review the care plan .The care plan will specify the opportunities, goal and interventions. A medical diagnoses list for Resident #14, dated 12/20/24, showed the resident had a diagnosis of dementia. A care plan for Resident #14, dated 04/09/26, showed the resident had dementia as a diagnosis which had not been cared planned. On 05/18/26 at 3:13 p.m., RN #1 stated Resident #14 had a diagnosis of dementia which had not been care planned. On 05/18/26 at 4:38 p.m., the administrator stated it was their expectation for an RN to care plan a resident's diagnosis of dementia.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure grievances were filed without fear of reprisal for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents who were reviewed for grievances. The administrator identified 93 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A grievance form, dated 04/03/25, showed a concern for Resident #3 regarding a resident they did not like. The intervention showed the administrator, AD, and SSD spoke to the resident. A quarterly assessment, dated 04/21/25, showed Resident #3 had a BIMS of 15, which indicate their cognition was intact, and diagnoses which included hypertension, renal insufficiency, and diabetes. A grievance form, dated 06/30/25, showed a concern for Resident #3 as resident to resident. No intervention was provided on the grievance form. A social services/activities note, dated 06/30/25, showed the SSD and AD met with Resident #3 to address their complaints. The note showed the conversation included a question to Resident #3 about if the resident was happy living at the facility and if not, should they consider whether the facility was the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain comfortable sound levels in halls, by resident rooms, and resident common areas of the facility. The facility alphabetical room roster showed there were 100 residents. On 06/04/25 at 4:30 p.m., several children were observed in the second floor billiard room, playing with the billiard balls on the billiard table by slamming the billiard balls against one another. The children's voices were loud. On 06/04/25 at 6:00 p.m., two children were observed entering the elevator. The children appeared to be under the age of 10 and each wore the walkie-talkie style headset the staff wore for inter-facility communication. On 06/04/25 at 6:15 p.m., a group of children stood in the first floor hallway, near an open office door. Another group of children were observed to access resident snacks off of the snack cart by the first floor nurses' station. On 06/06/25 at 1:00 p.m., Resident #A stated the administrator's child would come through and pass out activity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0659 — isolated
  Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to follow the plan of care for 1 (#4) of 6 residents whose clinical records were reviewed. The facility alphabetical room roster showed there were 100 residents. Findings: An undated Closet Care Plan, for resident #4 showed the resident was confused at times, had left side weakness, and transferred with a mechanical lift/sling and two person assistance. The history and physical, dated 05/02/25, showed the resident was recently hospitalized for a stroke as well as a history of stroke with subsequent left side weakness and numbness. The history and physical showed the resident also had a history of dementia and chronic right should pain. The Care Plan, dated 05/02/25, showed the resident had activities of daily living performance deficit related to impaired mobility secondary to a stroke. The interventions showed the resident required partial moderate assistance with upper body dressing and personal hygiene. The interventions showed the resident required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting, showering, lower body…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication orders from the physician were implemented for 2 (#2 and #4) and failed to ensure daily weights were obtained as ordered by the physician for 1 (#4) of 3 sampled residents who were reviewed for quality of care. The ADON identified 113 residents who received medications and 20 residents who were ordered daily weights. Findings: 1. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included low back pain and chronic pain. A physician order, dated 02/23/24, showed Resident #2 had been ordered cyclobenzaprine (a muscle relaxer) 10 mg every 12 hours as needed. The progress note by the physician, dated 02/20/25 at 2:01 p.m., read in part, Discontinue cyclobenzaprine. Review of the February 2025 medication administration record showed Resident #2 had been administered cyclobenzaprine 10 mg on 02/20/25 at 7:01 p.m. and on 02/23/25 at 12:36 a.m. The February 2025 medication administration record did not show the cyclobenzaprine had been discontinued per the physician's order. On 02/27/25 at 4:19 p.m., the DON stated the nurses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-03 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were completed as ordered by the physician for 2 (#2 and #6) of 3 sampled residents whose labs were reviewed. The ADON identified 113 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The progress note by the physician, dated 02/20/25 at 2:01 p.m., read in part, Please obtain readmit labs. Review of the clinical record did not show the readmission labs had been completed. On 02/27/25 at 4:19 p.m., the DON stated the charge nurses were responsible to ensure physician orders from the progress notes were implemented. They stated medical records staff reviewed the clinical record to ensure orders were implemented. On 02/27/25 at 4:22 p.m., medical records #1 stated they completed daily audits to ensure labs ordered by the physician had been implemented and ordered from the lab company. They stated they would look for the labs for Resident #2. On 02/27/25 at 4:48 p.m., medical records #2 stated they did not have any readmission labs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the Oklahoma State Department of Health within 2 hours for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents who were reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 113 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia. The Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation and Exploitation Investigation and Reporting policy, dated 10/18/22, read in part, All alleged violations will be reported immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do no involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. The following persons or entities will be notified, as required by state law, by Facility personnel (Administrator or Administrator Designee): a. Administrator b. State Survey Agency. The ODH form 283 showed an initial report for allegation of abuse/mistreatment, for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurate for 1 (#3) of 7 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 113 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 02/27/25 at 1:50 p.m., a BiPap was observed on Resident #3's nightstand. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included sleep apnea. A physician's order, dated 09/02/22, showed the resident was to wear a BiPap at bedtime. The quarterly assessment, dated 01/11/25, showed the resident did not utilize a non-invasive mechanical ventilator. On 03/03/25 at 8:51 a.m., Resident #3 stated they utilized their BiPap every night. On 03/03/25 at 1:34 p.m., MDS (minimum data set) coordinator #1 reviewed the quarterly assessment and stated the assessment was inaccurate for Resident #3. They stated the assessment should have shown the resident utilized a non-invasive mechanical ventilator.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to secure protected health information for six (Resident #206, #310, #315, #316, and Resident #318) of six residents whose protected health information was observed in a bin secured to the wall outside of a social service office. The administrator identified 113 residents in the facility. Findings: On 06/30/24, during the initial tour, the protected health information for six (Resident #206, #310, #315, #316, and Resident #318) of six residents was observed hand written on six sheets of paper observed in a a wall bin just outside of an office for social services. Each sheet of paper listed a resident's name, room number, sex, diagnoses, insurance, number of skilled nursing days available, hospital admit date , therapy ordered, prior living environment, and the resident's goal for their discharge living environment. On 07/03/24 at 3:50 p.m., the administrator reviewed the documents and stated the records were not secured.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-07-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were developed to treat limited range of motion for one (#27) of one sampled residents who were reviewed for limited range of motion. The DON identified 34 residents who had limited range of motion. Findings: Resident #27 had diagnoses which included paralytic syndrome affecting right dominant side. The Care Plan, revised 05/16/24, documented the resident had hemiplegia/hemiparesis of the right side and would remain free of complications through the review date. The quarterly assessment, dated 05/29/24, documented the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and had impairment on one side of the upper extremity. The Nsg Admit/Readmit/Quarterly Assessment, dated 06/24/24, documented the resident had limited range of motion to one hand. On 06/30/24 at 9:12 a.m., Resident #27 was observed in their room. Their right hand was observed to be closed with no splints or devices in place. Resident #27 stated they could not fully open their hand. On 07/02/24 at 3:42 p.m., the DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$35,721 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $35,721 — penalty dated 2025-03-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 31% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK