Colonel Glenn Health And Rehab, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 101 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.00 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.66 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Hcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interviews, facility documentation review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent a rash from spreading between residents in different rooms, on two different halls and two separate floors when reviewed for infection control and prevention for one of one infection control plan The findings include: Resident #1Review of an admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #1 on 11/01/2024, with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease and stroke. Resident #1 resided on the first floor of the facility. Review of a Medical Diagnosis report indicated Resident #1 was diagnosed with rash and other nonspecific skin eruptions on 11/10/2025, scabies on 11/15/2025, and unspecified skin changes on 11/22/2025. Review of an Orders Summary, indicated Resident #1 had orders for the following: -An antihistamine to be started on 08/05/2025, - An antibiotic due to elevated white blood cells ordered on 10/31/2024, -An oral antifungal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure minimum data set (MDS) assessments were transmitted after completion for 8 (Residents #4, #32, #47, #49, #55, #58, #76, #88) of 8 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessments. The findings are: On 04/23/25, the following issues were identified: 1. A review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/10/2025, status indicated Export Ready but had not been sent. The Completed MDS was dated 03/24/2025, and the Batch Accepted date was 04/24/2025. 2. A review of Resident #32 ' s record revealed that Resident #32 ' s quarterly MDS assessment completed on 03/10/2025 status indicated ready to export. 4. A review of Resident #47 ' s record revealed that Resident #47 ' s quarterly MDS assessment completed on 03/17/2025 status indicated ready to export. 5. On 04/24/2025 a review of Resident #49's MDS assessment history screen revealed a quarterly assessment dated [DATE], status was Export Ready,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, policy review, and the review of the menu, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents during 1 of 2 meals observed being prepared in the kitchen. The findings are: 1. A review of the 4/22/2025 Breakfast Meal Menu indicated the residents on a regular diet and the residents on a mechanically soft diet were to receive 3/4 cup of cereal, residents on pureed diets were to receive a #8 scoop (1/2 cup) of cereal, and residents on enhanced diets were to receive 1 cup of cereal. a. During an observation of the breakfast meal in the kitchen on 4/22/25 at 7:35 AM, the Dietary [NAME] (DC) #1 used a 4-ounce (oz.) ladle spoon (1/2 cup) to serve a single portion of regular oatmeal to the residents on regular diets and residents on mechanical soft diets, instead of 3/4 cup as specified on the menu. b. During an interview on 4/22/25 at 8:00 AM, DC #1 stated she looked at the menu but did not know why she had used a 4 oz. ladle spoon (1/2 cup) to serve…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were promptly removed / discarded on or before the expiration or use by date; Dietary staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment; Cold food items were at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below on ice while awaiting service for 2 of 2 meals observed; ensure meals were served at a safe and appetizing temperature to prevent possible food born illnesses for 1 (Resident #84) of 1 sampled resident. The findings include: 1.On 4/21/25 at 9:28 AM, the following observation was made in the walk-in refrigerator: A carton of half and half was on a shelf with an expiration date of 4/20/2025. 2. On 4/21/25 at 9:50 AM, the following observations were made in the first storage room: A box of cheese peanut butter crackers that contained 80 counts of crackers were on a shelf with an expiration date of 02/01/2025. A box of saltine crackers on a shelf had an expiration date of 02/01/2025. 3. On 4/21/25 at 10:25 AM, the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to update resident care plans to reveal an accurate code status (Full Code status changed to a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status) for 1 (Resident #5) of 2 residents sampled for revisions or updates to the care plan. The findings are: Review of Resident #5 ' s admission Record face sheet revealed Resident #5 ' s admission date was [DATE], and that Resident #5 ' s code status was Full Code. Review of Resident #5 ' s Hospice admission Record, completed on [DATE] revealed Resident #5 ' s code status had been changed to Universal Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), instructing providers not to do CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) if a patient's breathing stops or if the patient's heart stops beating. Review of Resident #5 ' s Care Plan, initiated on [DATE], revealed Resident #5 ' s code status was Full Code (Full code indicates cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is requested if the resident has no heartbeat and is not breathing).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for 1 resident (Resident #58) of 3 residents reviewed for fall prevention. The findings include: A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #58 with diagnoses that included spastic diplegic cerebral palsy which primarily affects the legs with stiffness and difficulty with walking, abnormality of gait and mobility, communication deficit, anxiety disorder, and muscle wasting and atrophy (muscle shrinking). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/08/2025, revealed Resident #58 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 5 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS revealed the resident had two or more falls since the prior assessment and required moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, sit to stand, and toilet transfer. An intervention for transfer indicated the resident required extensive assistance by one staff to move…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter drainage bag was not directly touching the floor for 1 (Resident #216) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for urinary catheter care. The findings are: Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #216 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood properly). Review of the Order Summary Report revealed [brand name] catheter: 16 French (FR) with 10 cubic centimeters (cc) balloon every night shift starting on the 15th and ending every month with an order date of 04/19/2025. Review of a Nursing Baseline Care Plan with a signed date of 04/18/2025, revealed for bowel and bladder, Resident #216 had an indwelling catheter. On 04/21/2025 at 2:13 PM, Resident #216 was observed lying in bed with eyes closed. On the right side of the bed, there was a urinary catheter drainage bag observed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the refrigerator and storage area were covered or sealed to maintain freshness and prevent potential cross contamination of food and beverages, that expired food items were promptly remove/discarded by the expiration or use by dates, that kitchen vents and ceiling tiles were cleaned to provide a sanitary environment for food preparation, and that baseboards were not missing and were free of chips, debris, rust, and dirt, that 1 of 2 ice scoop ice machines was maintained in clean and sanitary condition to prevent food and beverages contamination, that staff washed hands before handling clean equipment or food items to minimize the potential for contaminating food items for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen, and that hot food items were maintained at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit while awaiting service to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. This failed practice had the potential to affect 94 residents who received food from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess the Minimum Data Set [MDS] accurately reflected on Section J1800, any falls since Admission/Entry or Reentry or Prior Assessment, a history of falls affecting 1 sampled (Resident #68) of 4 residents with falls on 2A. The facility failed to update the Minimum Data Set [MDS] with a discharge with anticipation to return in a timely manner for 1 (Resident #32) of 46 residents discharged in the last 120 days. The findings are: 1. Resident #68 with a diagnosis of ALZHEIMER ' S DISEASE, Dementia, CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE and OBSTRUCTIVE AND REFLUX UROPATHY. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an Assessment Reference Date [ARD] of 07/21/2023 shows a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 99 (99 means unable to complete the interview). Resident #68 required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers dressing, eating, toileting and personal hygiene. a. A Care Plan (Revised, 01/05/2024) for Resident #68 documented, .The resident is High risk for falls r/t past…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered at the flow rate ordered by the physician to reduce the potential for respiratory complications for 2 (Resident #33, and #73) of 5 sampled residents. The facility failed to store oxygen tubing appropriately when not in use to prevent possible respiratory complications for 1(Resident #27) of 5 sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect 15 residents that had physicians' orders for Oxygen as documented on a list provided by the Director of Nursing on 02/15/24 at 3:50 PM. The findings are: 1. Resident #33 had diagnoses of Pulmonary fibrosis, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Heart failure. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/14/24 documented that the resident scored 7 (0-7 indicates severe impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and received oxygen therapy. a. The physician's order dated 8/3/23 documented, .O2 (Oxygen) at 3L/M(Liters per Minute) via NC (Nasal Cannula) continuously. May…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a call light was in reach for 1 Resident #3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents #69; #86; #91) who utilize the call light on unit 1-D. The facility failed to ensure that call lights located in the resident's bathroom were equipped with a device that would enable them to reach the call light should they fall for 1 Resident #34 who resides on unit 1-B and 2 Residents #86 and #399 sampled residents who reside on unit 1-D. The findings are: 1) Resident #3 has a diagnosis of shortness of breath, genetic causes of short stature, and glaucoma. On the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of December 23, 2023. The resident received a score of 15 (Cognitively Intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). a) On 02/12/2024 10:54 AM, Resident #3 stated Sometimes I have a hard time getting my call button when it falls to the floor. It doesn't stay clipped. I have to beat on the table to get them. The Resident's call light was noted to be lying on the floor. b) On 02/13/2024 11:22…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$50,700 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $50,700 — penalty dated 2025-12-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR