Cabot Health And Rehab, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 73.5 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.81 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the resident's transfer or discharge was reported to the ombudsman for two (Resident #75 and Resident #77) of two residents reviewed. The findings include: Resident #75 Review of Resident #75's Medical Diagnosis revealed diagnoses which included respiratory failure, congestive heart failure (CHF) and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #75's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #75 on 02/20/2026. Review of Resident #75's Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/21/2026 revealed Resident #75 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Progress Notes dated 02/21/2026 revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the nursing home on [DATE] from [Named] hospital for skilled services with severe abdominal distention, low fluid output and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff performed hand hygiene in between tasks for three (3) of three (3) staff (Dietary Aide #1, Dietary Aide #2 and Cook) observed in the kitchen. The findings are: A review of a facility policy titled Handwashing dated 05/15/2020, indicated, Purpose: To remove contamination after entering the kitchen, touching bare human body parts, using the toilet, coughing, sneezing, using a handkerchief or disposable tissue, using tobacco, eating or drinking, handlining soiled utensils or equipment, during food preparation, when switching between raw food and working with ready to eat food, before donning gloves for working with food, and after engaging in other activities that contaminate the hands A review of a facility policy titled Safe Food Handling Practices dated 10/23/2019, indicated, Policy: All food is purchase, stored, prepared, and distributed in a clean,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interviews, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 (Resident #52) of 8 sample mix residents. The findings are: On 12/9/24 at 9:29 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #52 lying in bed on their back at a thirty-degree (30') angle with eyes closed. Oxygen (O2) concentrator present in the room and running at two (2) liters per minute (LPM) through a nasal cannula with humidification. Tubing, humidification, and storage bag date 12/03/2024. Review of Resident #52's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2024, did not provide an area to document oxygen use. Review of Resident #52's Baseline Care Plan dated 11/04/2024 noted in section 4. Health Conditions: A. Health Conditions/ Special Treatments: 1a. Oxygen therapy- while a resident. Review of Resident #52's Order Summary Report dated 11/05/2024, noted change O2 tubing, clean filter and O2 cabinet, date all tubing every Monday night on 11-7 shift and for maintenance, O2 at two to four (2-4) LPM though nasal cannula.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan addressed and individualized appropriate care and services for 6 (Residents #52, #38, #60, #3, #44, and #377) of 15 sample mix residents reviewed for care plan. The Findings are: 1. On 12/09/24 at 9:29 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #52 lying in bed on their back at a thirty-degree (30') angle with eyes closed. Oxygen (O2) concentrator present in the room and running at two (2) liters per minute (LPM) through nasal cannula with humidification. Tubing, humidification and storage bag were dated 12/03/2024. Review of Resident #52's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2024, did not provide an area to document oxygen use. Review of Resident #52's Baseline Care Plan dated 11/04/2024, noted in section 4. Health Conditions A. Health Conditions/ Special Treatments 1a. Oxygen therapy- while a resident. Review of Resident #52's Order Summary Report dated 11/05/2024, noted change O2 tubing,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to ensure that nutritionally balanced meals were provided for the residents for 1 of 1 meal observed. The findings are: During an observation on 12/09/24 at 1:02 PM, the [NAME] asked the Dietary Manager (DM) to open more green beans to be cooked because there were not enough green beans to finish serving the residents. The DM confirmed there were no more green beans to cook and opened a can of spinach. The DM placed a partial can of spinach on the stove and placed a portion of the spinach in the microwave to cook. The DM obtained spinach temperature on the stove at 140.4 degrees. The DM removed spinach from stove and placed it on the steam table. The [NAME] began to serve spinach for the rest of the trays needed. During an observation on 12/09/24 at 1:19 PM, the [NAME] requested the dietary aide to make more puree chicken and dumplings, spinach, and bread. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 3:07 PM, the DM confirmed the kitchen ran…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was blended to a smooth consistency to meet the needs of residents who required a pureed diet during one (1) of one (1) meal service observed. The findings are: A review of a facility policy titled Therapeutic and Modified diets dated 08/24/2020, indicated, Purpose: To ensure residents receive foods with the appropriate textures and nutrient contents as prescribed by the physician to promote treatment and plan of care. Modified Consistency: Residents who require a modified consistency diet may be at risk for developing a foodborne illness due to the increased number of food handling steps required when preparing pureed and other modified consistency foods During an observation on 12/09/2024 at 11:49AM, pureed bread was prepared using milk, cornbread, white bread and milk. The consistency was thick and was not pudding like. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/09/2024 at 12:18PM, pureed green beans were a thin runny consistency, and the [NAME] verbalized the pureed green…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not ensure the survey inspection book was kept in a place where residents and family members could reach the book without asking. The findings are: On 12/11/2024 at 10:07 AM, during the resident council meeting Resident #7, Resident #49, Resident #61, and Resident #65 indicated that they did not know where the survey inspection book was located. On 12/11/24 at 10:12 AM, the survey inspection book was observed behind the nurse's station in a rack. The survey inspection book was not where the residents could reach it. During an interview on 12/11/2024 at 10:14 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that the survey inspection book was kept behind the nurse's station. The DON indicated that a resident would not be able to reach the survey inspection book if they were in a wheelchair. On 12/11/24 at 3:00 PM, the survey inspection book was observed behind the nurse's station in a rack. The survey inspection book was not where the residents could reach it. On 12/12/24 at 10:14 AM, the survey inspection book was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment of a resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history and preferences, using the resident assessment instrument (RAI) within 14 calendar days after admission to identify issues needed for comprehensive care plan development for 1 (Resident #52) of 8 sample mix residents. The findings are: On 12/9/24 at 9:29 AM, this surveyor observed Resident #52 lying in bed on their back at a thirty-degree (30') angle with eyes closed. Oxygen (O2) concentrator was present in the room and running at two (2) liters per minute (LPM) through a nasal cannula with humidification. Tubing, humidification, and storage bag were date 12/03/2024. Review of Resident #52's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for November 2024, did not provide an area to document oxygen use. Review of Resident #52's Baseline Care Plan dated 11/04/2024 noted in section 4; Health Conditions A. Health Conditions/ Special Treatments, 1a. Oxygen therapy- while a resident.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident Care Plan meetings were attempted every quarter for one (Resident #38) of one resident reviewed for Care Plan meetings. The findings include: On 12/12/2024 at 2:20 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator stated they spoke with the facility consultant, the facility does not have a policy for Care Plan meetings. Review of an admission Record indicated that the facility admitted Resident #38 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction due to occlusion or stenosis of the right middle cerebral artery (stroke). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/05/2024, revealed Resident #38 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the Resident had moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 12/09/2024 at 2:54 PM, Resident #38 stated I ' ve been to one [Care Plan] meeting in the last 5 years. During an interview on 12/11/2024 at 8:34 AM, the MDS Coordinator stated Resident #38 has not had a care plan meeting this year…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to remove facial hair for 1 (Resident #69) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The findings are: A review of an Order Summery Report indicated that Resident #69 had a diagnosis of dementia. The significant change Minimum Date Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference date (ARD) of 9/09/2024, revealed Resident #69 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision for personal hygiene. Review of Resident #69's Care Plan initiated 09/08/2024, revealed that Resident #69 required supervision to partial assistance by one staff for personal hygiene. On 12/09/24 at 10:18 AM, Resident #69 was observed sitting in a wheelchair outside the resident ' s room. Resident #69 had facial hair on the resident ' s chin and above the upper lip. On 12/09/24 at 10:25 AM, Resident #69 was observed in the resident ' s room. Resident #69 had facial hair on the resident ' s chin and above the upper lip. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR