Lakewood Health And Rehab, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 70.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.15 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.56 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-09-25 · tag F0847 — pattern
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure signing of the facility Arbitration Agreement was not a condition of admission and the agreement contained the stipulation that it could be rescinded within 30 days of being signed for two (Resident #19 and Resident #56) of three residents reviewed. The findings include: Resident #19 Review of an admission Record for Resident #19 indicated the facility admitted the resident on 06/07/2021 with diagnoses which included interrupted blood flow to the brain causing weakness or loss of sensation on one side of the body (stroke with hemiplegia), nerve damage throughout the body (polyneuropathy) and difficulty swallowing (dysphagia). Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/23/2025, indicated Resident #19 scored 10, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). During an interview on 09/24/2025 at 2:30 PM, this surveyor asked the Administrator for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure raw meat was thawed properly to prevent a potential foodborne illness; failed to ensure food stored in the freezer, refrigerator and dry storage area were covered, sealed and dated the day received and when opened to assure first in, first out usage to prevent potential for food bone illness, failed to ensure manufacturer specification was followed in order to prevent food spoilage, expired food items were promptly removed from stock in order to reduce the risk of food-borne illness for residents who received meal trays from 1 of 1 kitchen, dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen These failed practices had the potential to affect 72 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The findings are: On 07/08/2024 at 9:25 AM, the surveyor entered the facility kitchen and observed a sink with raw chicken thighs and legs soaking in standing water. The water was not running, and the sink was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained a palatable appearance, and at temperatures acceptable to the residents during 2 of 2 meals observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 15 residents who receive meal trays in their rooms on the 100 Hall,10 residents who receive meal trays on the 200 hall, 15 residents who receive meal trays on 300 hall and 13 residents who receive meal trays in their room on the 400 -hall. The findings are: 1. On 07/08/2024 at 10:10 AM, the surveyor asked Resident #32, How is the food in the facility? Resident #32 stated, The food is always ice cold. 2. On 07/10/2024 at 11:53 AM, an unheated food cart that contained 15 trays for lunch was delivered to 300-hall by Staff #2. At 12:09 PM, immediately after the last resident was served in their room on 300-hall, temperature of the food items on the tray used as a test tray were taken by the and was and read by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)#14 with the following result: a. Milk 45 degrees Fahrenheit. 3. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump-free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for residents who required pureed diets for 1 of 2 meals observed. This failed practice had the potential to affect 3 residents who received pureed diet. The findings are. 1. On 07/10/2024 at 10:16 AM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #11 used a 4-ounce spoon to place 4 servings of lasagna into a blender and pureed. At 10:21 AM, DC #10 poured the pureed lasagna into a pan and placed it in the oven. The consistency was thick, lumpy, and was not smooth. There were pieces of pasta visible in the mixture. 2. On 07/10/2024 at 10:40 AM, DC #11 placed 3 servings of garlic bread into a blender, added a carton of whole milk and pureed. At 10:42 AM, DC #10 used a #20 scoop to portion pureed bread stick into 3 bowls. The consistency of the pureed bread was lumpy and was not smooth. 3. On 07/10/2024 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor asked the Dietary Manager to describe the consistency. of the pureed food items served to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care was consistently provided to promote good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #39) of 2 (Resident #39 and #223) sampled residents who were reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. The findings are: Resident #39 had diagnoses of abnormalities of way of walking (gait) and mobility and lack of coordination as indicated on the Order Summary. A quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 05/06/2024 indicated Resident #39 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4, which indicated the resident was severely impaired. Resident #39's Care Plan, initiated 05/24/2024, indicated the resident had an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit related to confusion and limited mobility and required supervision of staff with bathing/showering on Monday, Wednesday and Friday and staff were to check the resident's nail length and trim and clean on bath days and as necessary. On 07/08/2024 at 9:43 AM, Resident #39 was lying in bed. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure an assessment for siderail use was completed for Resident #60 prior to installing siderails; to ensure an assessment of the bed, mattress and siderails was completed prior to the use of the siderails; to review the risks and benefits of siderails with Resident # 60; to obtain informed consent prior to the installation of the siderails on Resident #60 bed; to attempt the use of appropriate alternatives prior to installing siderails. The findings are: 1. A review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/20/2024, revealed Resident #60 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG0170 indicated Resident #60 is dependent on staff to do all the effort to complete an activity; or the assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity of Mobility. Section P0100 indicated Resident #60 was coded, bed rail - not used. Section I-Active Diagnoses identified Resident #60 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an inhaler was properly stored after use for 1 (Resident #35) of 1 sampled resident who had an inhaler on an over-bed table. The findings are: Resident #35 had a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as indicated in the Medical Diagnosis section of the electronic health record (EHR) An admission Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/07/2024 revealed Resident #35 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 04/12/2024 indicated Resident #35 had Emphysema/COPD and an intervention specified giving the resident an aerosol or bronchodilators as ordered. Review of Resident #35's Order Summary indicated an order for budesonide-formoterol (Symbicort) 160-4.5 mcg (micrograms)/actuation inhaler and to take two puffs inhale orally two times a day for COPD. There was no physician's order that indicated the inhaler could be left at the resident's bedside. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were consistently followed when administering medication and enteral feeding through a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 sampled resident who was on enhanced barrier precautions. The findings are: Resident #42 had a diagnosis of obstruction of the tube from the throat to the stomach (esophagus), difficulty swallowing (dysphagia) and gastrostomy status indicated on the Order Summary. A 5-day Medicare Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/16/2024 indicated Resident #42 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status score of 3, which indicated the resident was severely impaired, and that the resident had a feeding tube. Resident #42's Order Summary indicated an enteral feeding order of (Named) 1.5 and to give a 220 cc (cubic centimeters) bolus through the PEG tube one a day. It also indicated an order for enhanced barrier precautions related to the resident's PEG tube. Resident #42's Care Plan initiated 06/11/2024 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical information by posting photographs of residents to the facility's social media site without the written consent of the resident or the residents designated representative. The findings are: 1. On 07/09/2024 at 2:30 PM, the surveyor interviewed the Administrator, asking if the facility had a social media site. The Administrator stated, Yes, we have a social media page that we started during Covid. The surveyor asked if the facility had consents for posting to a social media site. The Administrator stated, I'm sure we do, we had to get those during Covid. I will check and see. The Surveyor asked the Administrator who has authorization to post to the facility's social media site. The Administrator stated, The Social Director and me. 2. On 07/09/2024 at 2:50 PM, the Consultant handed the surveyor a form titled HIPAA (Health Information Accountability Act) Authorization for Release of Health Information Media and for Use or Disclosure of Resident Photographic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the smoking policy of securing smoking materials for all residents. The findings are: Resident #3 had diagnoses of Unspecified psychosis and Unspecified dementia. The Annual Minimum Data Set [MDS] with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/25/2023 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status [BIMS] of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitive. Independent with transfers, ambulated with a walker and no impairment documented to upper or lower extremities. On 03/05/24 at 11:00 AM, Resident (R) #3 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the facility courtyard smoking area. He/she was wearing a smoking apron and was smoking a cigarette. Dietary Staff Member (DSM) #1 was heard asking R #3 if he/she had a cigarette lighter they could borrow. R #3 then removed a cigarette lighter from a pants pocket and handed it to DSM #1. DSM #1 took the lighter and lit two resident's cigarettes, then handed the lighter back to R #3, who placed it back in his/her pocket. On 03/05/2024 At 3:10 PM, DSM #1 was asked if staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR