Heather Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 76.3 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.80 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure written notification provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative of transfer/discharge to the hospital included all the required information for 3 (Resident #69, Resident #76, and Resident #49) out of 3 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The findings include: The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/20/2024, revealed Resident #69 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (indicating the resident was cognitively intact), and diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (Kidney Failure), seizure disorder, and diabetes (abnormal blood sugar). A review of the facility document titled Emergency Transfers from Facility indicated Resident #69 was transferred to the hospital on 4 occasions: a. 10/29/2024 to 11/04/2025 b. 12/18/2024 to 12/21/2024 c. 12/28/2024 to 12/30/2024 d. 01/08/2025 to 01/11/2025 On the morning of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff used infection control measures while providing care to 1 (Resident #70) of 1 sampled resident observed for incontinence care, and staff donned the proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to providing high contact care to 2 (Resident #11, #64) of 2 sampled residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), and proper hand hygiene was followed during wound care for 1 resident (Resident #53) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The findings include: 1. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/31/2024, revealed Resident #11 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. a. Review of a Plan of Care for Resident #11 with a revision date of 01/10/2025, revealed Resident #11 had an indwelling catheter due to a terminal condition and was on enhanced barrier precautions related to the indwelling catheter. b. On 02/03/2025 at 11:35 AM, this surveyor observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure privacy was protected, and dignity was maintained for 1 (Resident #70) of 1 sample resident observed for incontinence care. The findings include: A review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/08/2024, revealed Resident #70 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #70 was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. A review of the Plan of Care for Resident #70, revision date 07/05/2024, revealed Resident #70 had occasional incontinent episodes of bladder. On 02/04/25 at 2:24 PM, Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 provide incontinence care to Resident #70 with the blinds raised halfway and open at the top. The window was facing the parking lot to the front of the building, where the facility entrance was located. The surveyor observed several cars in the lot outside the window. CNA #4 removed the resident ' s brief while the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a written bed hold notification was provided prior to hospital transfer for 1 (Resident #76) of 7 sample residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1. A review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/28/2024, indicated Resident #76 had diagnoses of Dementia with other behavior disturbances, encephalopathy, presence of right artificial knee joint and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (13-15 indicates cognitively intact). a. A facility letter dated 12/18/2024, indicated Resident #76 was transferred to [named Hospital] for behavior symptoms. b. A review of Resident #76 ' s medical record revealed no documentation of bed hold notification was provided to resident or the resident representative at time of Resident #76 ' s transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. c. On 02/06/2025 at 11:35 AM, a bed hold…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure gradual psychotropic (antipsychotic) dose reductions were addressed and (anti-anxiety) dose reductions (GDR) were attempted in the absence of a physician's documented evaluation of the specific risks versus benefits of continuing the as needed (PRN) medication past 14 days and a documented explanation as to why a dose reduction attempt would be contraindicated, in order to ascertain the smallest effective dose and minimize the potential for adverse drug effects for 1 (Resident # 11) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/31/24, revealed Resident #11 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Review of a Plan of Care for Resident #11 with a revision date of 01/09/2025, revealed Resident #11 used the psychotropic medication [A brand name antipsychotic medication used to treat major depressive disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication was properly stored to prevent unauthorized individuals from having access. The findings include: On 2/04/25 at 9:05 AM, this surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 walk down the hall and enter a resident's room. This surveyor noted there was a vial of insulin, a tube of wound gel, and a plastic cup which contained a clear liquid on top of the medication cart left unattended in the hallway. On 02/04/25 at 9:08 AM, this surveyor observed LPN #3 walk down the hall and enter a resident's room. This surveyor noted there was a vial of insulin, a tube of wound gel, and an unlabeled plastic cup with a clear liquid inside on top of the unattended medication cart. On 02/04/25 at 9:44 AM, this surveyor observed LPN #3 administer the contents in the plastic cup to a resident. LPN #3 stated he had pre-prepared a resident ' s [laxative solution mediation name] which was in the plastic cup. LPN #3 stated it was not standard practice to pre-prepare medications, but the [laxative solution…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, investigation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that hand sanitation was performed while preparing food, that kitchen equipment was clean and properly maintained, that food was in useable condition, that food was stored at least 6 off the floor, and that dirty dishes were properly placed in the dishwasher. The findings are as follows: 1. On 04/03/2024 at 12:08 PM, Dietary Aide #1 placed her hands under her apron, retrieved her glasses, and without washing her hands continued to set food up for serving. 2. On 04/03/2024 at 12:30 PM, the seal on the Ice Machine on the right, between the vent and ice container, was held in place by tape. 3. On 04/03/2024 at 12:38 PM, the following observations were made: a) The walk-in freezer contained 12 wheat sub rolls and 60 white sub rolls on the top shelf with ice particles inside the bag and surrounding the rolls. b) Ice was frozen to the side of the freezer door. The Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed she should scrap the ice off because it interferes with the seal of the freezer. 4. On 04/03/2024 at 12:39 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity, and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted the maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 2 (Residents #25 and #50) sampled residents with the potential to affect 8 Residents dependent on staff for meal assistance. The findings are: 1. Resident #25 had diagnoses of Paraplegia and Major depression disorder. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/11/2024 documented Resident #25 scored an 11 (8-12 indicates moderate cognitive impairment) on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), and required limited assistance with eating. a. On 04/01/2024 at 12:50 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 placed a clothing protector around Resident #25's neck and voiced to the resident, Don't try to feed yourself, you are a feeder. b. On 04/01/2024 at 12:55 PM, CNA #1 set Resident 25's meal, one of the first trays to come out the kitchen, on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure combustible equipment was safely locked away from residents who wonder and/or self-propel throughout the facility. This failed practice had the potential to affect 8 (Residents #30, #68, #4, #50, #23, #28, #81, and #19) sampled residents of 38 residents who could self-propel in a wheelchair. The findings are: On 04/01/2024 at 09:05 AM, the Surveyor opened a door labeled Oxygen at the end of 200 Hall and found portable oxygen tanks, supplies, and other equipment inside. A second Surveyor arrived and observed the Surveyor standing with the door open. On 04/01/2024 at 09:14 AM, the Surveyor opened a door labeled Oxygen at the end of 600 Hall and found portable oxygen tanks, supplies, and other equipment inside. On 04/01/2024 at 09:07 AM, the Surveyor asked the admission Coordinator if the door should be locked, referring to the door labeled Oxygen at the end of 200 Hall. The admission Coordinator stated, Yes ma'am, it should be locked. On 04/01/2024 at 09:15 AM, the Surveyor asked Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the storage container used to store controlled medications requiring refrigeration was permanently affixed. The findings are: On 04/01/2024 at 10:15 AM, during observation of medication room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, LPN #1 removed the storage box used to store refrigerated controlled medications and placed the storage box on the counter. The Surveyor instructed LPN #1 to open the storage box for an inventory of what was contained inside. The Surveyor noted that the storage box contained 3 syringes of Lorazepam 2 mg/ml (milligram/milliliter) for emergency use and prescribed Lorazepam 0.25ml syringes. On 04/01/2024 at 10:20 AM, the Surveyor asked LPN #1 if the storage box was used to store refrigerated controlled medication permanently affixed. LPN #1 voiced that it was not attached and to his knowledge it was only required to be under 2 locks. On 04/02/2024 at 12:38 PM, the Surveyor asked the Director of Nursing (DON), what halls does the front medication room store medications for? The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR