Ashton Place Health And Rehab, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 231 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 134 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 115.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.28 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.13 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure manufacturer specifications were followed to maintain food quality; dietary staff washed their hands and changed their gloves before handling food items; hot food items were maintained at or above 135 degrees Fahrenheit on the steam table while awaiting service and cold food items were maintained at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit for 1 of 1 meal observed. The findings are: 1. On 3/26/25 at 11:05 AM, this surveyor observed 7 bags of hamburger buns, each containing 12 buns. There was one bag that contained 5 hamburger buns. The buns had been left on the bread rack by the ice machine since they were received on 3/21/2025. The manufacturer's specification was to keep frozen when received. The Dietary Manager was interviewed and asked how long the hamburger buns had been out. The Dietary Manager stated since the time of purchase, and they have never been put in the freezer. 2. On 3/26/25 at 11:43 AM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #3 removed a log of butter from the refrigerator and placed it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, facility policy review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene while passing ice to residents to prevent the spread of infection and cross contamination. This failed practice had the potential spread of infection to all residents on the 400 Hall who received ice. The facility also failed to ensure residents were free from the risk of infection by providing a safe, sanitary environment related to flushing a feeding tube by not following enhanced barrier precautions, specifically ensuring the nurse wore a gown during 1 of 1 observation of flushing the feeding tube of 1 sampled (Resident #103) resident. The findings include: 1. A review of a facility policy titled, Ice/Scoop, Handling the, with a revision date 11/22/16, revealed staff should always wash their hands thoroughly before handling the ice scoop. a. A review of a facility policy titled, Handwashing and Glove usage in Food Service, revealed food handlers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a client with a right hand contracture was receiving right hand splint treatments in line with Resident #103's physician orders and goals as outlined in the comprehensive care plan during 4 of 4 observations of 1 (Resident #103) of 1 sampled resident to prevent the risk of further reduction in range of motion. The findings include: A review of the Medical Diagnosis, revealed Resident #103 had diagnoses that included stroke, dysphasia, and aphasia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/31/2024 revealed Resident #103 had short term and long term memory problems per a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS). Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated March 2025, revealed Resident #103 had an order dated 12/20/2024 for a right-hand resting splint to be worn and monitored by nursing staff daily for 6 to 8 hours. Nursing had initialed daily that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure information regarding resident care was posted in a manner that protected the privacy of one 1 Resident (Resident #24) of 1 sampled resident who resided on 200 Hall. The findings are: On 1/4/2024 at 9:09 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 did not lock cart or close the screen down. At 9:19 AM, when LPN#1 was taking a medication to a resident the cart was unlocked and screen up. a. On 1-4-24 at 9:39 AM, the Surveyor asked the LPN #1 how should the nurse leave the med cart when out of your sight. LPN #1 stated, Locked and screen locked. The Surveyor asked, why? The LPN said, So no one can get in it. b. On 1-4-24 at 9:41 AM, the Surveyor asked the LPN #2 when a nurse is giving medication and leaves the cart to administer medication to the resident, how should the medication cart be left. LPN #2 stated, Medication cart to be locked and hide screen. The Surveyor asked, why? The LPN #2 stated, For resident security, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) . Also, a resident could get in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that lotions, perfumes, and powder containers were not allowed in the facility for 5 Residents (R#4, #38, #46, #54, and #91) final sample residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents in 100 and 200 hall. The findings are: a. On 1/2/2024 1:05 PM, R #91 is sitting up in the bed with 2 lotions on bedside table and 2 lip balm on the bedside table. On 1/3/2024 at 8:30 AM, R #91 is sitting up in the bed, drinking milk, breakfast was just delivered. There are 2 lotions and 2 balm on the bedside table. b. On 1/2/2024 at 1:09 PM, R #46 sitting in the recliner, with a visitor. Resident has 2 lotions and 2 perfumes laying out on bedside table. On 1/3/2024 at 8:30 AM, R #46 sitting up in the recliner, eating breakfast. The 2 lotions and 2 perfumes are still sitting out on bedside table. c. On 1/2/2024 at 1:25 PM, R #4 has a coffee table in room and has lotion sitting out on it. On 1/3/2024 at 8:38 AM, R #4 is sitting up in bed and eating breakfast. The lotion is still out on the card…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders and the manufacturer's guidelines were followed to prevent a significant medication error, which could result in complications for 1 (Resident #104) of 1 sampled resident who had physician orders for NovoLog insulin. The findings are: A review of the Patient Information, NovoLog, revised on 4/2015, specified, NovoLog starts acting fast. You should eat a meal within 5 to 10 minutes after you take your dose of NovoLog. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #104 with a diagnosis of sepsis and diabetes mellitus. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #104 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required moderate / supervision for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident #104's Care Plan, initiated on 12/21/2023, revealed the resident had diabetes mellitus.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with state laws and accepted standards of pharmacy practice for 1 (Resident #85) of 1 sampled residents, to prevent the possible ingestion and or injury. The findings are: On 1/3/2024 at 10:23 AM, a card of Ondansetron HCL 4 milligram (mg) tablet containing 21 pills was located in the bottom drawer of the 100 Hall medication cart for Resident #85. The medication fill date was 12/30/22. The medication expiration date was 12/30/23. On 01/03/2024 at 10:30 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 was asked why should expired medications be pulled from the medication carts. LPN #6 stated, Because it's not safe to use anymore. LPN #6 was asked how often are the medication carts checked for expired medications. LPN #6 stated, I'm not sure, I know night shift does it. On 01/04/2024 at 11:36 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verbally confirmed the facility did not have a medication storage policy. On 01/05/2024 at 11:12 AM The DON was asked why should expired medications be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods in the dry pantry were properly sealed, dated and stored in 1 of 1 facility kitchens. This failed practice had the potential to affect 112 (total 114 in facility) residents who received their meals from the kitchen. The findings are: 1. On 01/02/24 at 12:13 PM, an initial tour was conducted. On 01/02/14 an individual open box of baking soda was observed sitting on the top shelf of open metal shelving. Baking soda in a plastic bag with no visible open date on the bag. The box of baking soda had a dark discolored line across the bottom of the box that appeared to be discolored due to some type of moisture. 2. On 01/02/24 at 12:15 PM, the Dietary Manager was asked if this box of baking soda was safe to use. The Dietary Manager stated No, I will throw that away. We don't know what caused the moisture.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control precautions were implemented and followed, as evidenced by failure to implement universal source control by wearing face shields/goggles and failed to ensure staff implemented hand hygiene before entering a COVID-19 positive resident room, for 1 (Resident #56) of 1 sampled resident, to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 and or other respiratory diseases. This failed practice had the potential to affect 114 residents. , according to the Roster Matrix provided by the Administrator on 1/2/2024 at 12:15 p.m. The findings are: A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #56 with diagnoses that included COVID-19 and dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #56 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was dependent for toileting and showers and required maximum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff. This failed practice had the potential to affect 3 residents. The findings are: a. On 1/2/2024 at 1:13 PM, Resident #72 is in the dining room in an electric wheelchair with bilateral arms are cracked and torn. On 1/3/2024 at 8:32 AM Resident is up in electric wheelchair with bilateral cracked arm. b. On 1/2/2024 at 1:17 PM, Resident #84 is sitting up in bed eating lunch. The right arm on the wheelchair is cracked. c. On 1/2/2024 2:25 PM, Resident #24 is in wheelchair with bilateral arms that are torn with padding showing. d. On 1-4-2023 at 3:41 PM, the Surveyor asked the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) is there a protocol of how the employee's let you know that something in the facility needs attention. The MS said, yes, they write it in the Maintenance Log or page me and I will come check it out. The Surveyor asked, how long does it take to care for the issue. The MS stated, Typically, the same day. The Surveyor asked, how…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR