No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Greenbrier Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

#16 Wilson Farm Road, Greenbrier, AR 72058 · For profit - Individual · 90 certified beds · (501) 679-0860 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (501) 679-0860 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 11 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
49 S Broadview St · (501) 679-4030 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
75 S Broadview St · (501) 287-6003 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
75 South Broadview · (501) 287-6001 · Call to confirm hours
Park
25 Ivy St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.4%9.5%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.5%4.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.8%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.2%10.1%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication40.2%21.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.0%13.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.3%10.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.3%77.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.1%24.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.5%12.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.022.011.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.122.131.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
61.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 61.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.8%CMS range 51.9–68.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 8.0–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge61.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.2–13.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.14
RN hoursweekends
39.1%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 82.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.37 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

0
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-07)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medication on 2 of 2 medications carts and 1 of 1 treatment cart had medications safely secured and 1 of 1 medication room had medications safely secured for 3 carts and 1 medication room reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, revised in January 2018, indicated medications should be stored safely and securely with access limited to licensed personnel and pharmacy staff. During an observation on 09/10/2024 at 4:57 AM, the 500-Hall medication room, located directly behind the nurse's desk, had the door propped open by a trash can in the doorway. A sign on the door stated, Medication Room, as well as a sign on the door indicating Door to be closed at all times. LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) #5 was sitting at the nurse's desk, along with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #13 standing at the kiosk, located to the left of the nurse's desk. At 5:20 AM, LPN #5 had prepared medication for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure food products were discarded on or before the expiration date, food preparation surfaces are sanitized between use, and staff properly washed hands with soap and water to prevent cross-contamination effecting 74 of 74 residents who reside within the facility and receive foods or services from the kitchen. The findings include: During an observation and interview on 09/09/2024 at 1:00 PM, the Dietary Manager walked outside of the facility to where the dumpsters were located, and she opened the gate for the dumpsters. Upon re-entering the kitchen and without washing her hands, the Dietary Manager opened the ice machine lid and touched parts of the inside of the ice machine. This ice machine was used by kitchen staff to provide beverages for all residents. The Dietary Manager stated her hands should have been washed between going outside and coming inside and touching clean supplies. During a concurrent observation and interview on 09/09/2024 at 2:00 PM, Dietary Aide #1 wiped down the kitchen countertop with a washcloth.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure aseptic technique was maintained during Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line Intravenous (IV) medication administration 1 (Resident #14) of 6 residents observed during medication administration. The facility also failed to initiate and or follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 3 residents (Resident #14, #24, and #53) of 9 residents reviewed for infection control. Findings include: 1. Review of a facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated 11/22/2017, indicated hand hygiene was the primary means to prevent the spread of infections and should not be replaced with the use of gloves. Integration of hand hygiene with glove use is recognized as best practice for preventing healthcare-associated infections. 2. Review of an undated facility policy titled, Infusion Therapy/Medication Administration indicated, hand hygiene should be performed after identifying the resident and explaining the procedure. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of the resident's quality of life by not dressing the resident in clean clothes after showering/bathing and not dressing the resident in clean clothes daily for 1 (Resident #45) of 1 resident reviewed for resident rights. The findings are: The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/20/2024, revealed Resident #45 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review indicated the resident had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and required setup assistance for upper body dressing. A review of Resident #45's care plan, revised on 07/19/2021, revealed the resident had an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care deficit related to Alzheimer's, confusion, and dementia. Interventions included providing assistance of one staff for bathing and dressing. On 09/09/2024 at 11:44 AM, during a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately completed for 1 (Resident #50) of 18 sampled residents who were reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure information regarding a resident's tobacco use was accurately completed. Findings include: A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #50 with diagnoses that included nicotine dependence, cigarettes, with other nicotine-induced disorders and heart disease. The admission MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/11/2024, revealed Resident #50 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Section J1300 indicated Resident #50 was not a tobacco user. A review of Resident #50's care plan, with a revised date of 07/15/2024, revealed no focus, goal or interventions for tobacco use. A review of the Nsg [Nursing] Smoking Assessment and Care Plan, dated 04/05/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a care plan was accurately completed for 1 (Resident #50) of 18 sampled residents who were reviewed for a comprehensive care plan. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure information regarding a resident's tobacco use was accurately documented. Findings include: Review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #50 with diagnoses that included nicotine dependence, cigarettes, with other nicotine-induced disorders and heart disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/11/2024, revealed Resident #50 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Section J1300 indicated Resident #50 was not a tobacco user. Review of Resident #50's care plan, with a revised date of 07/15/2024, revealed no focus, goal or interventions for tobacco use. Review of the Nsg [Nursing] Smoking Assessment and Care Plan, dated 04/05/2024, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure milk and refrigerated foods were not stored and served to residents beyond the expiration or use by date and food and beverages were served in a sanitary manner to prevent cross contamination for 1 (Resident #51) of 5 (Residents #40, #51, #57, #60 and #61) sampled residents who eat in the 400 Hall Dining Room. The failed practices had the potential to affect 67 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 67) as documented on a list provided by the Administrator on 08/24/23 at 4:15 PM and 10 residents who eat in the 400 Hall Dining Room as documented on a list provided by the Administrator on 08/24/23 at 10:35 AM. The findings are: 1. On 08/21/2023 at 10:31 AM, the Surveyor observed 6 half-pint cartons of 1% milk with an expiration date of 08/16/23 in the cooler. The Surveyor asked Dietary Employee (DE) #1 what the process was for putting milk on the breakfast trays, and who was responsible for serving milk to the residents. DE #1 said, The dishwasher puts milk on the trays. DE #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Physician Orders for oxygen were followed for 1 (Resident #49) and all oxygen tubing, humidifier bottles and oxygen bags were dated for 2 (Residents #49 and #568) of 3 (Residents #12, #49 and #568) sampled residents who had Physician Orders for oxygen therapy on the 100 Hall and the 300 Hall. The findings are: 1. Resident #49's Physician Orders dated 04/30/23 noted the resident was to receive Oxygen (O2) at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula every shift and the O2 tubing was to be changed and dated every Saturday on day shift. a. A Care Plan with an initiated date of 05/18/21 noted Resident #49 received O2 therapy at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula and the O2 tubing was to be changed and dated every Saturday. b. On 08/21/23 at 11:40 AM, Resident #49 was lying in bed receiving O2 via nasal cannula at 1 liter per minute. c. On 08/22/23 at 10:50 AM, Resident #49 was lying in bed receiving O2 via nasal cannula at 1 liter per minute. The humidifier bottle on the concentrator was not dated. d. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure floors and bedside tables were clean for 1 (Resident #7) of 19 (Residents #3, #7, #10, #12, #14, #18, #20, #29 #33, #37, #40, #41, #49, #53, #54, #57, #60, #61 and #568) sampled residents. The findings are: a. On 08/21/23 at 1:01 PM, Resident #7 was lying in bed. A clear liquid measuring half the length of the bed was on the floor under Resident #7's bed. b. On 08/21/23 at 4:14 PM, Resident #7 was lying in bed with the bedside table across the bed. Smeared across half of the surface of the bedside table was a sticky, clear substance. The large amount of clear liquid remained on the floor under the bed. c. On 08/22/23 at 10:48 AM, Resident #7 was lying in bed. The bedside table was across the bed and the same sticky, clear substance remained on over half of the surface of the tabletop with Resident #7's personal belongings sitting on top of the smeared surface. The clear liquid remained under the bed. The liquid now measured less than half the length of the bed. d. On 08/22/23 at 3:43 PM, the Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nail care was regularly provided for 1 (Resident #7) of 5 (Residents #3, #7, #10, #49 and #54) sampled residents on the 100 Hall. The findings are: a. A Care Plan with a revision date of 07/05/23 noted Resident #7 had an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit related to impaired mobility and required extensive assistance for personal hygiene needs. b. On 08/21/23 at 1:01 PM, Resident #7 was lying in bed. Her fingernails extended approximately ¼ to ½ inch past the fingertips with a brown substance underneath them. Resident #7 stated, My nails are in horrible shape. I used to have beautiful nails. When you can't see to do them yourself, you can't help it. The Surveyor asked if she liked her nails the way they were. Resident #7 answered, No, they need cutting. They are sharp. c. On 08/22/23 at 10:48 AM and 3:15 PM, Resident #7's fingernails remained approximately ¼ to ½ inch past the tips of her fingers with a brown substance under them. d. On 08/22/23 at 3:42 PM, the Surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental/oral care products were stored in a sanitary manner to prevent the potential for infection for 1 (Resident #37) of 1 sampled resident on the 300 Hall. a. On 08/21/23 at 11:37 AM, sitting on the back of Resident #37's bathroom sink were 2 unlabeled denture cups. A denture toothbrush and a tube toothpaste were lying on the back of sink behind the handles of the sink. The toothbrush was uncovered, and the bristles of the toothbrush were touching the sink. The toothpaste did not have a lid on it. b. On 08/22/23 at 9:53 AM, sitting on the back of Resident #37's bathroom sink was 2 unlabeled denture cups. A denture toothbrush and a tube toothpaste were lying on the back of sink behind the handles. The toothbrush was uncovered, and the bristles were touching the sink. The toothpaste did not have a lid on it. c. On 08/23/23 at 1:45 PM, sitting on the back of Resident #37's bathroom sink were 2 unlabeled denture cups. A denture toothbrush and a tube of toothpaste were lying on the back of the sink behind…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.6+1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 53.2+1.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 37 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Alma Nursing and RehabAlma, AR 1 of 5Jamestown Nursing And Rehab, LLCRogers, AR 2 of 5Apple Creek Health And Rehab, LLCCenterton, AR 2 of 5Belvedere Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, LLCHot Springs, AR 2 of 5Colonel Glenn Health And Rehab, LLCLittle Rock, AR 2 of 5Highlands Of Bella Vista Health & Rehab, LLCBella Vista, AR 2 of 5Innisfree Health And Rehab, LLCRogers, AR 2 of 5Robinson Nursing And Rehabilitation Center LLCNorth Little Rock, AR 3 of 5Aspen Health and RehabBroken Arrow, OK 3 of 5Bradford House Nursing and Rehab, LLCBentonville, AR 3 of 5Briarwood Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, INCLittle Rock, AR 3 of 5Brooken Hill Health And Rehab, LlcFort Smith, AR 3 of 5Eufaula Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterEufaula, OK 3 of 5Hickory Heights Health And Rehab, LlcLittle Rock, AR 3 of 5Lake Hamilton Health And RehabHot Springs, AR 3 of 5Quapaw Care And Rehabilitation Center LLCHot Springs, AR 3 of 5Russellville Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRussellville, AR 3 of 5Sherwood Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, IncSherwood, AR 4 of 5Ashton Place Health And Rehab, LLCBarling, AR 4 of 5Cabot Health And Rehab, LLCCabot, AR 4 of 5Chapel Ridge Health And RehabFort Smith, AR 4 of 5Cherokee County Nursing CenterTahlequah, OK 4 of 5Dardanelle Nursing And Rehabilitation Center,incDardanelle, AR 4 of 5Heather Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterHope, AR 4 of 5Johnson County Health And Rehab, LLCClarksville, AR 4 of 5Lakewood Health And Rehab, LLCNorth Little Rock, AR 5 of 5Atkins Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterAtkins, AR 5 of 5Greystone Nursing And Rehab, LLCCabot, AR 5 of 5Hampton Place Healthcare, LLCRogers, AR 5 of 5Legacy Heights Nursing And Rehab, LLCRussellville, AR 5 of 5Lonoke Health And Rehab Center, LLCLonoke, AR 5 of 5Nursing And Rehabilitation Center At Good ShepherdLittle Rock, AR 5 of 5Oak Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center INCBooneville, AR 5 of 5Perry County Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPerryville, AR 5 of 5Salem Place Nursing And Rehabilitation Center, INCConway, AR 5 of 5Shiloh Nursing And Rehab, LLCSpringdale, AR 5 of 5Superior Health & Rehab, LLCConway, AR

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MORTON, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/11/2006
SAMS, JERRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2007
USSERY, STACEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/10/2024
CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/21/2025
GREENBRIER NURSING PROPERTY, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2024
NURSING CONSULTANTS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/21/2025
SMITH, LANDERIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/10/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+19.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$982K
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 7%Other / private 37%

This home reported $982K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$262per resident / day
operating cost
$7,955per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$325per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arkansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arkansas
$7,452/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$8,060/mo
Nursing home (private)
$4,637/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 045381. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next