Innisfree Health And Rehab, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 136 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 82.2 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.55 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2024-11-15 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Through observation and interview the facility failed to post the results of the most recent survey of the facility in a place readily accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents. The findings are: During observations from 11/11/2024 at 1:00PM through 11/15/2024 at 9:15AM, the only time residents were seen in the vicinity of the greeting desk was with the escort of facility staff, contracted therapy staff or contracted transportation staff. During observations from 11/11/2024 at 1:00PM through 11/15/2024 at 9:15AM, the facility survey book was located on the far back right-hand side of the greeting desk. The greeting desk had a staff member assigned to the position. To obtain the facility survey book a resident or representative would be required to reach through the assigned staff members workstation. The facility survey book was back far enough to where a resident in a wheelchair would not have the ability to obtain the book without the need to ask. Observations from 11/11/2024 at 1:00PM through 11/15/2024 at 9:15AM showed there was not a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated to include contracture and contracture management for 1 resident (Resident #13) of 1 resident reviewed for positioning and mobility and contracture management. Findings include: No policy was provided for contracture management. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #13 with diagnoses that included dementia, pain, muscle wasting and atrophy, and hemiplegia (partial or complete paralysis to one side of the body). Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/18/2024, revealed Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #13 was shown to have an impairment of the upper and lower extremity for functional limitation in range of motion. A review of Resident #13's Care Plan, initiated on 11/14/2024, revealed the resident had an alteration in musculoskeletal status related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to remove two bottles of expired tube feeding from current stock for 1 of 1 medication room and failed to label two insulin vials and three inhalers with open dates when the manufactures seal was broken in 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, revised in [DATE] indicated, when the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated. The nurse shall place a date opened and enter the date opened. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:07 AM, of the Long Term Care medication room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5, two bottles of tube feeding in current stock were revealed to have expiration dates of [DATE]. LPN #5 stated, the bottles needed to be thrown away. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared in a method that maintained an appearance that was acceptable to the residents to encourage good nutritional intake for 2 of 2 meals observed. The findings are: 1. A review of the facility recipe titled, Egg sausage bake initiated 9/17/2024 and provided by the Dietary Manager on 11/14/2024 indicated use water or stock. 2. On 11/13/24 at 4:14 PM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #1 placed 10 servings of egg sausage bake into a blender and pureed. DC #1 did not add broth or anything to help moisten it. At 4:24 PM, DC #1 poured the pureed sausage with egg casserole into a pan and placed it in the oven. The consistency was thick when it was placed in the oven and remained thick when it was placed on the steam table to serve. On 11/14/24 at 12:55 PM, DC #1 was asked what he used when pureeing egg sausage bake to make it moist. DC #1 indicated that he did not use anything. 3. On 11/13/24 at 4:32 PM, DC #1 placed 10 servings of biscuits into a blender, ground, then added warm milk from a pan on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff changed gloves and washed their hands before handling food items and clean equipment when contaminated; food items stored in the refrigerator and freezer were covered, sealed, and dated; expired food items were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date. The findings are: 1. On 11/13/24 at 2:54 PM, Dietary [NAME] (DC) #1 was wearing gloves on his hands when he picked up a spray bottle and sprayed inside of the pans, contaminating the pans. Without changing gloves and washing his hands, DC #1 removed hash browns from a box and placed them on the pans to be baked and served to the residents for supper meal. 2. On 11/13/24 at 2:59 PM, the following observations were made on a shelf in the freezer. a. An opened box of breaded pork patties. The box was not close or sealed. b. An opened box of turkey burgers. The box was not covered or sealed. c. An opened box of pie dough.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store oxygen tubing and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) tubing and mask for 2 (Resident #13-oxygen tubing and Resident #52-CPAP tubing and mask) of 2 residents reviewed for Infection prevention and control of equipment or devices. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Oxygen Safety, revised on 11/22/2016, indicated, the facility would properly handle oxygen. During an interview, Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility did not have a policy regarding cleaning and storage of CPAP and oxygen tubing and other devices when not in use. A review of an admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #13 with diagnoses that included shortness of breath, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/18/2024, revealed Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Through observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents were able to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from their bed. This affected 4 (Residents #5, #24, #84, and #250) of 19 sampled residents. The findings are: Record Review of Resident #250 ' s admission Report dated 10/25/2024, showed diagnoses of communication difficulties, abnormal mobility, left side weakness and/or paralysis after a stroke, and nerve malfunctions. Record Review of Resident #250 ' s Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed Section C Cognitive Pattern to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15. Section GG Functional Abilities showed impairment on one side upper and lower extremity and use of wheelchair was required. Section GG Functional Abilities on OBRA/Interim showed staff was required to help with more than half of the effort for Resident #250 to go from a seated position to a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide written bed hold notice for 1 (Resident #97) of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: A review of the policy titles, Bed Hold Policy and Return, revised on 11/22/2016 indicated, the bed hold policy was sent with the resident to the hospital in case of a transfer or emergency. The resident or their representative would be contacted the next business day to identify if they want to hold the bed. It should be documented on the bed hold form, then filed in the business office. If contact was made by phone a witness is required to listen, and two signatures are required when filling out the bed hold form. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/11/2024, revealed Resident #97 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #97 ' s admission Record revealed Resident #97 was their own…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure oxygen was on the care plan for 1 (Resident #28) of 1 sampled resident. The findings are: A review of Resident #28's Order Summary Report revealed a diagnosis of shortness of breath. A review of Resident #28's Order Summary Report revealed an order dated 10/04/2024, for oxygen 1-4 liters by nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/09/2024, revealed Resident # 28 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #28 had oxygen therapy while a resident. A review of Resident #28's Care Plan did not indicate that Resident #28 was on oxygen. On 11/12/2024 at 2:11 PM, an oxygen tank was observed in Resident #28's room. Resident #28 indicated that he used oxygen 2 days ago. On 11/14/2024 at 3:23 PM, during an interview, the Long Term Care MDS Coordinator indicated that Resident #28 ' s oxygen was not on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided hand roll for contracture management for 1 (Resident #13) of 1 resident reviewed for providing contracture management. Findings include: No policy was provided for contracture management. A review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident #13 with diagnoses that included dementia, pain, muscle wasting and atrophy, and hemiplegia (partial or complete paralysis to one side of the body). Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/18/2024, revealed Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #13 was shown to have an impairment of the upper and lower extremity for functional limitation in range of motion. A review of Resident #13's Care Plan, initiated on 11/14/2024, revealed the resident had an alteration in musculoskeletal status related to contracture (left hand…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS — 38 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR