Chandler Post Acute And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 115 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 90% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 105.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of facility documents and policy, the facility failed to ensure that a medication was administered following the physician ordered parameters for one resident (#135). The deficient practice resulted in hospitalization due to lowered blood pressure. Findings included:Resident #135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of the hospital records revealed the resident #135 had a past medical history of urinary tract infection (UTI), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA), Hypertension, and Cerebrovascular Disease (CVA).The admission progress note dated November 10, 2025 included the resident arrived at the facility; and that the resident was alert, oriented x 4, awake and able to make needs known. The care plan dated November 10, 2025 included interventions to administer medications/treatments as ordered, to monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness and to report occurrences to the physician.A review of the order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the clinical record review, observations, interviews, facility documentation, and policy, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed and PPE was appropriately applied for one resident (Resident #9) , and infection control measures were implemented for a resident with a urinary catheter (Resident #71) and during a dressing change (Resident #166). This deficient practice can result in contamination and spread of infection. Findings include: Regarding Resident # 71 Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with conditions that included encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of right leg above knee, long-term (current) use of anticoagulants, need for assistance with personal care, generalized muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit, hypertension, wound infection, and diabetes mellitus. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) accepted November 30, 2025, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview Mental Status Score…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, facility documents, and policy, the facility failed to ensure several residents' rooms were equipped with a working communication system to call for staff assistance. The deficient practice could place residents' safety at risk.Findings include:An observation in the behavioral unit was conducted on December 9, 2025 at 10:50 AM and revealed the call light in one room (#1) was on the floor behind the resident's bed and was out of reach.An observation of another room (#2) in the behavioral unit was conducted on December 9, 2025 at 1:33 PM, and there was no call light available for resident use. In a later observation of room (#1) conducted on December 9, 2025 at 3:20 PM, the same room (#1) continued to have the call light out of the resident's reach. The call light was on the floor behind the resident's bed.During a medication administration observation conducted on December 11, 2025, at 6:22 AM, an interview was conducted with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN/Staff #468) who stated that the behavioral unit was staffed with 1 nurse and 3-4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#9) and/or the resident representative were informed of the risks and benefits of restraints prior to usage of abdominal binder, waist/seat belt restraint and bilateral mitt restraints. The deficient practice could result in residents and/or resident representatives not being aware of the benefits and risks of restraints. The census was 109.Findings include:Resident #9 was initially admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included gastrostomy, anoxic brain damage, anxiety, and dementia. A behavior progress note dated October 22, 2022 revealed that a binder was placed over the resident's peg tube to prevent him pulling the peg tube out.Review of progress notes dated October 22, 2022 through February 24, 2025 revealed no evidence of a consent for the use of a binder from the resident's representative, or acknowledgement of risks/benefits.A care plan initiated on February 25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that monitoring and evaluation were conducted for the least restrictive alternatives for the least amount of time and conduct ongoing evaluations of the need for physical restraints for one resident (Resident #9). The deficient practice could result in the resident not able to use a less restrictive alternative. The census was 109. Findings include:Resident #9 was initially admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included gastrostomy, anoxic brain damage, anxiety, and Dementia.A behavior progress note dated October 22, 2022 revealed that a binder was placed over the resident's peg tube to prevent him pulling the peg tube out.A nursing progress note dated October 23, 2022, revealed the patient tried to pull out a PICC line and tube feeding while he was in a geri-chair and he required 1-2 staff members to be with him just to keep him safe.A physician progress note dated February 10, 2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation of an allegation of neglect was completed for one resident (#9). The census was 109. The deficient practice could result in incomplete investigations of allegations of abuse.Findings included: Resident #9 was initially admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included gastrotomy, anoxic brain damage, anxiety, and dementia. A Comprehensive Data Set Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated November 04, 2022, revealed no BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score; however, it did indicate that Resident #9's cognitive skills for daily decision-making were severely impaired. A change in condition note dated November 06, 2022, at 16:59 revealed that Resident #9 made multiple attempts to put himself on the ground from his geri (geriatric) chair. The note further revealed that the resident had mats in his room and a helmet on for his safety. The note also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure that on residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment regarding restraints was accurate. The deficient practice could result in inaccurate documentation of the resident's medical history and needs. The census was 109. Findings include:Resident #9 was initially admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included gastrotomy, anoxic brain damage, anxiety, and dementia. A behavioral progress note dated February 13, 2025, indicated that a G-tube was replaced, a new hand mitts and binder placed.A March 4, 2025 behavior note revealed that the resident had been restless and agitated, posey mitts were in place and abdominal binder to protect G-tube site.A Care Plan initiated on May 21, 2025, revealed a focus area for physical restraints documenting the use and the bilateral soft wrist mittens related to traumatic brain injury. This care plan also revealed an intervention…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the state mental health authority was notified of a resident's change in mental condition for one resident (#37). The deficient practice could result in residents not receiving the proper level of care to meet their needs.Findings Include:Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included atherosclerotic heart disease, bipolar disorder, and colostomy status. A Level 1 Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) dated February 25, 2025 was completed with no referral was necessary for PASARR Level 2. Further review of the PASRR revealed that the Bipolar Diagnosis was not included. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated that the resident was congenitally intact. Further review of the MDS revealed no psychiatric or mood disorders and special treatment which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:Number of residents cited: 1Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, review of facility documents, policy, [NAME] Nursing Drug Book, and Medlineplus.gov website, the facility failed to ensure medications for one resident (#14) were administered as ordered by the physician and according to accepted standards of clinical practice. The deficient practice could place residents' safety at risk.Findings include:Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, hypoglycemia, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.The care plan dated December 7, 2023, revealed the resident had Diabetes Mellitus. The interventions included diabetes medication as ordered.A physician order dated February 6, 2024 revealed an order for Metformin Hydrochloride (HCL) 500 MG tablet give one tablet by mouth with meals for diabetes. And, another physician order with a revision date of July 16, 2024 revealed an order to OK to crush and combine crushable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and the facility's policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that food items were properly stored and dated to meet safety standards. The deficient practice could result in loss of nutritive value and increase the risk of foodborne illness. Findings include:An initial kitchen observation was conducted on December 9, 2025, at 8:20 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (Staff/#308). The following were observed in the walk-in refrigerator:Salad bag opened, exposed to air, and labeled with open and use by dates of 12/6-12/121lb ground beef, without an open or use-by date Employee lunch bag on the shelfBoiled eggs container opened, exposed to air9 unlabeled and undated juice cups1lb bag of green beans opened, exposed to air bag of lettuce opened and exposed to air During a follow-up Kitchen Observation conducted on December 11, 2025, at 6:26 a.m., two sheet cake pans were observed uncovered on the prep counter. A tray line temperature check and observation conducted on December 11, 2025, at 11:46 am revealed the following:12/11/2025 11:40 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical record, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to protect a resident's (#10) right to be free from physical abuse from another resident (#8). The deficient practice could result in physical and psychosocial harm.-Regarding Resident #10 (alleged victim): Resident #10 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included contracture of right and left hands, need for assistance with personal care, personal history of traumatic brain injury, and anoxic brain damage.A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderate cognition impairment. Additionally, the assessment revealed Resident #10 had no hallucinations, no delusions, no inattention, no disorganized thinking, and no altered level of consciousness.Resident #10's care plan was reviewed and revealed no evidence of physical or psychosocial monitoring related to an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 344 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ