No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sun West Choice Healthcare & Rehab

14002 West Meeker Blvd, Sun City West, AZ 85375 · For profit - Corporation · 140 certified beds · (623) 584-6161 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (623) 584-6161 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 20251 actual-harm citation$4,838 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $4,838 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-28)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
13901 W Meeker Blvd · (623) 465-6435 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
19602 N R H Johnson Blvd · (623) 214-1015 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Bashas'0.1 mi
13940 W Meeker Blvd · (623) 975-6220 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
19424 N R H Johnson Blvd · (623) 556-9570

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.4%10.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight14.7%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.5%3.9%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%2.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.7%12.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication44.9%21.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.3%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.7%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.7%20.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.7%10.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%87.3%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.6%23.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.4%10.4%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.5%CMS range 49.7–69.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.9%CMS range 9.2–17.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.8–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.61
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
34.4%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 134.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-03)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-02-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to one resident (#1) to prevent a fall with injury. The deficient practice resulted in a fall with injury. Findings include: Resident #1 was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included epilepsy, personal history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. A care plan initiated on March 29, 2023 included the resident had ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit related to TBI and was at risk for falls related to right sided weakness. Interventions included two-staff participation with transfers and wearing of safety helmet, frequent reminder to allow staff to supervise while ambulating, call light be within reach, encourage to call for assistance as needed, wearing appropriate footwear when ambulating or wheeling in wheelchair and keeping needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to protect the rights of three residents (#38, #24, #23, #11) to be free from abuse from other residents (#39, #22, #10). The deficient practice could result in residents being physically or emotionally harmed.Findings include: -Regarding Resident #38 and #39 Resident #38 was re-admitted to the facility March 30, 2022, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer’s Disease, Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, Unspecified Severity, with other Behavioral Disturbance, Hypertension, Depression, Schizoaffective Disorder, and Unspecified Mood [Affective] Disorder. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #38 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. A care plan dated January 26, 2023, revealed Resident #38 was an elopement risk/wanderer related to impaired safety awareness, potential for behavior problem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews and reviews of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure care and services that adhere to accepted standards related to medications administration was provided to one resident (#125). The deficient practice could result in resident not receiving the necessary treatment needed. Findings include: Resident #125 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and depression. The care plan initiated on April 7, 2024 revealed the resident had altered cardiovascular status hypertension, atrial fibrillation, trans ischemic attack history. The goal was that the resident will remain free from signs and symptoms of hypertension. Interventions included give antihypertensive medications as ordered, monitor for side effects such as orthostatic hypotension and increased heart rate, and effectiveness, notify physician of any signs and symptoms of cardiovascular complications: nausea, vomiting, shortness of breath,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an abnormal lab results for one resident (#91) were promptly communicated to the provider. The deficient practice could result in complications and/or worsening of resident's health. Findings include: Resident #91 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, dysphagia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and psychotic disorder. The ADL (activities of daily living) care plan dated July 26, 2024 revealed the resident had ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia, impaired mobility and UTI (urinary tract infection). Interventions included for staff to provide up to extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, transfers, personal hygiene and locomotion on and off unit. Another care plan dated July 26, 2024 included that the resident had bowel/bladder incontinence related to dementia and impaired mobility. Intervention included to monitor/document for signs/symptoms of UTI. The late entry NP (nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed clinical record review, staff interview, and the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was accurate for one resident (#121). The sample size was 25. The deficient practice could result in an inaccurate assessment and resident not receiving the appropriate care and services needed. Findings include: Resident # 121 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, down syndrome, restlessness and agitation, adult failure to thrive, essential (primary) hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, hyperlipidemia, syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone, hyperkeratosis of [NAME], and personal history of urinary (tract) infections. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident # 121 included that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not conducted because the resident was rarely/never understood.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive care plans were developed for one resident (#121) using oxygen therapy. The deficient practice could result in residents needs based on the comprehensive assessment not being met. Resident # 121 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, down syndrome, restlessness and agitation, adult failure to thrive, essential (primary) hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, hyperlipidemia, syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone, hyperkeratosis of [NAME], and personal history of urinary (tract) infections. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident # 121 included that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not conducted because the resident was rarely/never understood. The assessment included that the resident had an ok short- and long-term memory with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, staff interviews, and facility policies and procedures, the facility provided a psychotropic medication for Bipolar disorder for one resident (#72) without a diagnosis of Bipolar disorder: Findings include: Resident # 72 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified fracture of right calcaneus, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, other viral pneumonia, other coronavirus as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, urinary tract infection, site not specified, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, asthma, hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, or unspecified chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe), long term (current) use of insulin, obesity, depression, long term (current) use of anticoagulants, fibromyalgia, and dysphagia. Review of the clinical record revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that maintenance and housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior was provided for 7 residents (#24, #63, #11, #74, #31, #41, and #76). The census was 124. The deficient practice could result in resident rooms not having a homelike environment. Findings include: An observation was conducted on January 3, 2022 at 9:45 AM. The hallway and room of resident #24 and resident #63 were noted to have a foul odor. Under the window to the exterior wall of the residents' room and closest to resident #24's bed, wall paper was observed peeling from the base of the window downward to the floor in 2 areas. Behind the wallpaper that was peeling was an open hole in the wall. The hole was observed to be approximately 8 to 10 inches in width and 4 to 6 inches in height. The closet space provided for resident #24 had closet fixture pieces that were wire-like that were on the floor inside that closet, and broken plastic brackets inside of the closet. On the floor near…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-07 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the written notice of transfer/discharge for two of two residents (#76 and #37) was sent to the Office of the State Long Term Ombudsman. The deficient practice could result in the ombudsman not being notified of resident transfers/discharges. Findings include: -Resident #76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis, major depression, and anxiety. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated August 31, 2021 indicated the resident was cognitively intact with a score of 11. Review of the progress notes revealed the following: -On October 16, 2021 at 10:17 p.m. change of condition: symptoms or signs of condition change: altered mental state. -On October 16, 2021 at 10:37 p.m. resident refused medications and was noted to have altered mental state. Slurring words or not answering. Leaning over in wheelchair. Nurse Practitioner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-07 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately for 8 residents (#27, #64, #75, #33, #52, #66, #63, and #37), by failing to conduct the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and for one resident (#75) regarding hospice. The sample size was 25 residents. The deficient practice could result in not identifying necessary care needs and treatment. Findings include: -Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia without behavioral disturbance and major depressive disorder. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the assessment was coded that the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) should be attempted with the resident, however, this section was not completed. The staff interview for mental status was also not completed. -Resident #64 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, resident and staff interviews, and facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring and supervision was provided for six residents (#s 107, 76, 41, 32, 83, and 82). The deficient practice could result in other residents being denied the right to privacy and personal space. Findings include: Resident #107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of the care plan for elopement risk/wanderer dated February 25, 2021 revealed the resident wanders on the unit. Interventions included to distract the resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, book, provide structured activities: toileting, walking inside and outside, reorientation strategies including signs, pictures and memory boxes, and re-direct resident when he wanders. Review of progress notes revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directive was accurately documented for one of two sampled residents (#27). The census was 124. The deficient practice could result in residents receiving services which are not in accordance with their wishes. Findings include: Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, major depressive disorder, anemia and osteoarthritis. Review of the Advance Directive form in resident's #27 clinical record revealed that the resident does not want cardiac resuscitation measures (CPR) and does not want artificial nutrition (tube feeding) if unable to accept nourishment by mouth. The form also revealed that consent was received from the resident's family member on [DATE] and the form was signed by the facility representative on [DATE]. However, a physician's order dated [DATE] stated CPR/Full Code. Further review of the clinical record did not reveal the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of sexual abuse for one resident (#32) was reported to the State Agency. The deficient practice could result in allegations of abuse not being reported as mandated by federal guidelines. Findings include: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder, delusional disorders, and cognitive communication deficit. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] included a brief interview mental status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment also included the resident did not hallucinate or have delusions during the look-back period. During an interview conducted with the resident on January 3, 2022 at 10:14 a.m., resident #32 stated that there are two guys that come into her room. She said that one of the men that came into her room the day before yesterday and tried…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, review of facility policy, and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, the facility failed to ensure that a significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for one resident (#75) who was admitted on hospice services. The sample size was 25. The deficient practice could affect residents' continuity of care. Findings include: Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, senile degeneration of brain, and major depressive disorder. A physician order dated October 14, 2021 included an order for hospice to evaluate and treat. A hospice informed consent revealed the consent was signed by the resident's legal guardian for a start of benefits on October 14, 2021. Review of the physician order dated October 18, 2021 revealed the resident was with hospice, diagnosis senile degeneration of the brain. A review of the Care Plan initiated on October 18, 2021 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control standards were maintained when handling one resident's (#70) medication during medication administration. The sample size was 6. The deficient practice could result in transmission of infection. Findings include: Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following an unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting the right dominant side and essential hypertension. Review of the clinical record revealed a physician order dated November 9, 2021 for Atenolol 50 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension. A medication administration observation was conducted on January 5, 2022 at 7:57 AM with a Registered Nurse (RN/ Staff #118). Staff #118 was observed preparing medications for resident #70. During the observation, the RN was observed to take out the resident's medication named Atenolol (antihypertensive)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$4,838 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $4,838 — penalty dated 2023-08-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.2+1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GRANGER, TERRYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2018
NASSOUR, WILLIAMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2022
PETERSON, FORRESTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/27/2020
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/10/2013
FISCHBECK, COURTNEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2025
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
PIONEER HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2018
PRIME TIME HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2018
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/22/2025
AZORE PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/11/2018
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2013

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+18.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.0M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 4%Other / private 26%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$333per resident / day
operating cost
$10,122per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$407per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Arizona Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Arizona
$8,365/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,437/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,250/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 035110. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next