Harbor Villa Care Center
861 S. Harbor Blvd, Anaheim, CA 92805 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (714) 635-8131 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (83) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.7% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.09 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.95 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
37.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 54% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 37.3%CMS range 25.7–49.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.0%CMS range 8.1–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 66.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 5.2–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 89.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.447 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
83 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 72 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free from potentially serious accident hazards for 15 of 15 residents (Residents 2, 10, 11, 24, 37, 39, 43, 53, 56, 63, 71, 76, 79, 92, and 394) who smoked in the facility. * The facility failed to ensure the safe smoking practices were followed for 15 residents who smoked in the facility as evidenced by: - The residents were not accurately and thoroughly assessed to determine if they required supervision or any adaptive safety equipment while smoking, nor if they could safely store their own cigarettes or lighters. - The residents who were assessed as requiring adaptive safety equipment, such as a smoking apron (a fireproof apron that protects the resident's body, clothing, and wheelchair from smoking-related injuries), were not provided with the adaptive safety equipment while smoking. - The residents who were assessed as requiring supervision while smoking or those with a history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the development of pressure injuries for two of three final sampled residents (Residents 10 and104) reviewed for pressure injuries. * The facility failed to offload Resident 10's heels, as ordered by the physician and failed to provide a pressure relieving mattress with a pump as ordered by the physician. * The facility failed to offload Resident 104's heels as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential for the residents to result in new pressure injuries, worsening of existing wounds, or other complications.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Prevention of Pressure Injuries (undated) showed in part in the prevention skin care section to do not rub or otherwise cause friction on skin that is at risk of pressure injuries. Provide support devices and assistance as needed. Remind and encourage to change positions. Select…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one two of four residents (Residents 6 and 44) observe for the medication administration were free from the significant medication errors. * LVN 1 administered the furosemide (medication to treat fluid retention) medication outside the physician's ordered parameter for Resident 6. * LVN 3 administered the heparin (blood thinner) medication without a physician's order for Resident 44. These failures posed the risk of adverse complication to the residents.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications (undated) showed the medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. The P&P also showed the individual administering the medications checks the label to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. 1. On 4/8/26 at 0938 hours, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure to prepare food by methods that conserve nutritive value and at safe and appetizing temperature for 11 residents that consumed pureed food and 45 residents on Regular Diet Texture. * The prepared pureed vegetables were left in the oven for more than one hour before the lunch food tray line. * The ham temperature was at 98 degrees Fahrenheit. These failures had the potential for the residents not to eat the food served and could affect the residents nutritional status. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Food Preparation and Service (not dated) showed food and nutrition services employees prepare, distribute and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Proper hot and cold temperatures are maintained during food distribution and service. 1. Review of the facility's Diet Type Report dated 4/7/26, showed 11 residents consumed pureed food prepared in the kitchen.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed for 81 of 87 residents who eat in the kitchen. * Food items used for residents' food were not properly stored, labeled and dated. * One expired bottle of opened ground ginger spice was not discarded. * The kitchen equipment and utensils were not maintained in a sanitary condition. * One cutting board was observed heavily marred and fuzzy with knife marks. * The pitchers were stored wet. * The hair restraint was not worn by one staff member preparing food in the kitchen. * Nonfood contact surfaces were not clean or in a cleanable condition. These failures had the potential to contaminate the food which could lead to foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's Diet Type Report dated 4/7/26, showed 81 of 87 residents consumed the food prepared in the kitchen. On 4/7/26 at 0615 hours, during the initial tour of the kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility's P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents or their representatives were informed in advance of the proposed treatment regarding the use of psychotropic medications (medications affecting brain activity) for two of five residents (Residents 3 and 4) reviewed for unnecessary medications. * The facility failed to have separate informed consent and nonpharmacological interventions for Resident 4's use of the clonazepam (a prescription medication used to treat seizure disorders and panic disorder by acting as a central nervous system depressant), lorazepam (a medication used for short-term management of anxiety disorders, insomnia, acute seizures (status epilepticus), and pre-anesthetic sedation) and aripiprazole (medication used to treat mental health conditions by balancing dopamine (critical neurotransmitter and chemical messenger in the brain that regulates pleasure, reward, motivation, memory, and motor control). In addition, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 87 residents (nonsampled resident, Resident 91) was assessed to self-administer of medication. The facility failed to ensure there was a physician's order and self-administration assessment for the Vicks VapoRub (cough suppressant and topical analgesic) ointment medication found at the resident's bedside. This failure had the potential to impact Resident 91's safety and well-being and an increased risk of improper medication use. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medications (undated) showed the residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. On 4/7/26 at 0816 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 91 was observed sitting in bed and watching TV. A container of Vicks VapoRub ointment was observed inside an open drawer of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for the residents, staff, and visitor was provided in one of four hallways. * One of four hallways was observed with a handrail that was sharp to the touch. This failure posed the risk of injury to the residents, staff, and visitors.Findings: On 4/7/26 at 0709 hours, the handrail in Hallway A was observed with an uneven surface. The paint on the handrail was peeling, exposing the wooden surface underneath. The handrail felt sharp to the touch. On 04/7/2026 at 1346 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director. The Maintenance Director verified the above findings.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of five final sampled residents (Residents 3 and 4) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 3 was properly monitored for orthostatic blood pressures (measure the blood pressure while laying down or sitting and again upon standing up) as ordered by the physician. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 3's monthly behavior summary for the use of olanzapine (a medication for mental disorders including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder) and mirtazapine (antidepressant medication) were completed. * The facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was attempted for Resident 4 when the facility failed to follow the psychiatrist's order to discontinue the clonazepam medication. These failures had the potential for adverse health outcomes to the residents related to the effects of psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the PASARR recommendations were followed up and incorporated into the resident's care for one of seven final sampled residents (Resident 8) reviewed for PASARR. * The facility failed to ensure the PASARR Level II recommendations were followed and incorporated into Resident 8's care. This failure had the potential for Resident 8 not to receive the adequate care that was recommended by the PASARR Level II evaluation report that completed by an appropriate state-designated authority.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 8 was initiated on 4/7/26. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 8's H&P examination dated 3/4/25, showed Resident 8 was competent and able to make decisions. Review of Resident 8's admission Records dated 4/9/26, showed Resident 8 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia. Review of Resident 8's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 3/16/26, to administer haloperidol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice for one of four final sampled residents (Resident 10) reviewed for unnecessary medications and one nonsampled resident (Resident 87). * The facility failed to ensure the insulin injection site was rotated for Resident 10. * The facility failed to ensure the insulin injection site was rotated for Resident 87. The facility failed to ensure Resident 87's insulin was administered accurately as ordered by the physician. The insulin Regular Human injection (medication to lower blood sugar levels) solution was not administered to Resident 87 when the sliding scale (amount of insulin to be administered based on the blood sugar results) showed to administer 1 unit of insulin Regular Human injection solution. These failures had the potential for the residents not to receive appropriate care and treatment.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 72 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of four final sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 8) received the appropriate services needed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status. * The facility failed to follow up when Resident 8 refused CNA Helping Hands assistance, as recommended by the dietician and as ordered by the physician, after the resident experienced a weight loss of more than 5 (five) pounds in one month. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of nutritional interventions and increase the risk for further weight loss and nutritional decline.Findings: Review of the facility P&P titled Nutrition (impaired)/ Unplanned Weight Loss Clinical Protocol (undated) showed the staff will report to the physician significant weight gains or losses or any abrupt or persistent change from baseline appetite or food intake. The staff and physician will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the PICC line assessments were performed and documented for one of one final sampled resident (Resident 58) reviewed for the IV management. * The facility failed to obtain and document the external catheter length measurement upon admission for Resident 58's PICC line. This failure posed the risk for the resident developing complications related to PICC line displacement, malfunction, or infection.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled PICC Dressing Change dated 3/2023 showed the length of external catheter is obtained upon admission. Medical record review for Resident 58 was initiated on 4/7/26. Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 58's H&P examination dated 3/23/26, showed the resident had the capacity to make medical decisions. Review of Resident 58's PICC line insertion documentation (undated) showed the PICC was inserted on 3/22/26, at the acute care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure necessary respiratory care and services were provided for one of three sampled resident (Resident 44) reviewed for respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 44 received the correct amount of oxygen via nasal canula per the physician's order. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 44's medical conditions. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administrator (undated) showed to verify that there is a physician's order; review the physician's order or facility protocol for oxygen administration. On 4/7/26 at 0744 hours, an observation of Resident 44 was conducted in the resident's room. Resident 44 was observed with a nasal canula tubing in her nose connected to the oxygen concentrator, which was on and set at 2.5 liters per minute. On 4/7/26 at 1009 hours, an observation of Resident 44 and concurrent interview was conducted with the DON inside the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of the residents. * One of four LVNs (LVN 4) observed for medication administration discarded the liquid medication in the medication cart's trash bin. This failure had the potential for the medications to be administered in error and opportunities for drug misuse.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Discarding and Destroying Medications (undated) showed non-controlled and Schedule V (non-hazardous) controlled substances are disposed of in accordance with state regulations and federal guidelines regarding disposition of non-hazardous medications. Review of the facility's document titled Lesson Plan- Course Subject: Medication Admin/Blood Pressure Medication Parameters dated 1/8/26, showed the medications would be disposed in the red container located inside each nurse cart, not in the trash can or resident personal trash. Review of the facility's document titled Inservice Lesson Plan and Attendance Record dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the drugs, biologicals, or medical supplies were stored in a safely for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 6) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 91). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 6's Inhaler medication (ciclesonide) was not left at unattended at the resident's bedside. * The facility failed to ensure a packet of Vitamins A&D (skin protectant) ointment was properly stored for Resident 91. These failures had the potential to result in medications being contaminated, misused, or accidentally administered to the wrong resident.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Labeling, and Storage (undated) showed the nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. Medications are stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, or automatic dispensing systems. Each resident's medications are assigned to an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the menu and recipes were followed for one of 81 residents (Resident 14) who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 14 was served the braised cabbage as per the menu. This failure posed the risk of negatively impacting Resident 14's satisfaction and dietary compliance.Findings: Review of the facility's Diet Type Report dated 4/7/26, showed 81 of 87 residents consumed the food prepared in the kitchen. Review of the facility's P&P titled Menus (undated) showed menus are developed and prepared to meet resident choices including religious, cultural and ethnic needs while following established national guidelines for nutritional adequacy. Menus for regular and therapeutic diets are written at least two (2) weeks in advance and are dated and posted in the kitchen at least one (1) week in advance. The dietitian reviews and approves all menus. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were followed. * The facility failed to conduct a facility-wide risk assessment to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens (e.g. Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Burkholderia, Stenotrophomonas, nontuberculous mycobacteria, and fungi) could grow and spread in facility water system. This failure posed a risk of exposure and potential illness to the residents, staff, and visitors by allowing unidentified and uncontrolled areas within the water system where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Legionella Water Management Program (undated) showed the facility was committed to the prevention, detection and control of water-borne contaminants, including legionella. The purpose of the water management program are to identify areas in the water system where legionella bacteria can grow and spread, and to reduce the risk of legionnaires…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to offer and provide required education on the benefits and potential side effects for the seasonal influenza and pneumococcal immunizations for two of five residents (Residents 8 and 14) reviewed for the immunizations. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 8 was offered pneumococcal and seasonal influenza vaccinations and provided with education regarding their benefits and potential side effects. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 14 was offered seasonal influenza vaccination and provided with education regarding its benefits and potential side effects. These failures had the potential for the residents and/or their representatives not being informed of the benefits and risks of the seasonal influenza and pneumococcal vaccines to make an informed decisions and put the residents at increased risk of infection and transmission of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination.Findings: Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were offered and provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of seasonal COVID-19 vaccine for two of five residents (Residents 8 and 14) reviewed for the COVID-19 immunization. * The facility failed to offer and provide education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of seasonal COVID-19 vaccine for Residents 8 and 14. This failure placed the residents at risk for increased risk of infection and transmission of COVID-19 and had the potential for the residents and/or their representatives not being informed of the seasonal COVID-19 vaccines.Findings: Review of facility P&P titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents dated May 2023 showed each resident is offered COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated or the resident is fully vaccinated. The resident (or resident representative) has the opportunity to accept or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the residents' care equipment was maintained in a safe operating condition. * One of four LVNs (LVN 1) observed for medication administration used a non-facility issued BP automatic machine to obtain Resident 6's BP prior to medication administration. The facility failed to ensure the calibration for the personal BP machine was conducted. This failure had the potential for the essential equipment not to function in the way it was intended and the risk of resulting in inaccurate resident BP measurements.Findings: Review of the Omron BP5100 (automated BP machine) Instruction Manual (undated) showed Home as the environment of use. On 4/8/26 at 0938 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 6 was conducted with LVN 1. Prior to administering the medications for Resident 6, LVN 1 obtained the resident's BP reading using a non-facility issued automatic BP machine (Omron BP5100) and the resident's BP reading was 103/68 mmHg and heart rate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards was provided for two of three sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). * Resident 1 used a razor to self-inflict harm. * Resident 2 had two razors and two scissors in an unlocked bag inside Resident 2's closet, easily accessible to other residents. * The razors used to shave the male residents were unlocked and unsecured at Nurse Station A and inside a supply closet. These failures posed the risk of the residents accessing the sharp devices and resulting in injuries to the residents.Findings: 1. On 1/23/26, CDPH received a complaint about Resident 1 verbalizing thoughts of committing suicide. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 1/23/26. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was sent out to an acute hospital on 1/22/26, due to self-inflicted wounds. Review of Resident 1's Psychiatric Progress Note dated 12/4/25, showed the resident had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to prevent accidents for three of six sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3). * The facility failed to ensure the risks of leaving the facility unsupervised without informing the staff were explained to Resident 1. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's smoking assessment was accurate and complete. * Resident 2 and 3's post fall neuro checks were not completed per their care plans. These failures had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1, 2, and 3's health condition and well-being.Findings: 1. a. Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans - Comprehensive (undated) showed each resident's care plan is designed to:- incorporate identified problem areas- incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems- build on resident's strengths- reflect the resident's expressed wishes regarding acre and treatment goals- reflect treatment goals, timetables and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their P&P on Abuse Investigation and Reporting by failing to report an allegation involving the resident to resident physical altercation between two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) when Resident 1 alleged Resident 2 had hit him on the right cheek and Resident 1 had allegedly hit back Resident 2. This failure had the potential to put Residents 1 and 2 and other residents at risk of not being protected against the alleged abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting (undated) showed all the reports of the resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse ) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations), and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. 1. Medical record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P reviewed, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an alleged incident involving the resident to resident physical altercation between two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) when Resident 1 alleged Resident 2 had hit him to the right cheek and Resident 1 had allegedly hit back Resident 2. This failure had the potential to put Residents 1 and 2 and other residents at risk of not being protected against the alleged abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting (undated) showed all the reports of the resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse ) shall be thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. 1. Medical record review forResident 1 was initiated on 6/12/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's H&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and the facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the discharge process was properly followed for Resident 1. * Resident 1's closed medical record failed to show the physician's documentation to show Resident 1 was ready for discharge. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to unsafely discharge from the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Transfer or Discharge, Facility Initiated dated 10/22 showed should the resident be transferred or discharge for any of the following reasons, the basis for the transfer or discharge is documented in the resident's clinical record by the resident's attending physician: 1. The transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare, and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility; or 2. The transfer or discharge is appropriate because the resident's health has improved sufficiently so the resident no longer needs the services provided by the facility. Closed medical record review for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medial record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from the physical restraint (physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to obtain the orders to place a soft mitten on Resident 2's left hand. * The facility failed to ensure the appropriate assessment was completed prior to placing a soft mitten restraint on Resident 2. * The facility failed obtain the consent for the application of the soft mitten restraint for Resident 2. * The facility failed to monitor Resident 2 for the use of restraints. * The facility failed to ensure the comprehensive plan of care for Resident 2 was revised to reflect the current resident assessment for restraints. These failures had the potential to negatively affect Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable well-being for two of three sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). * The facility failed to assess the resident for the use of supplemental oxygen and failed to obtain a physician's order for Resident 1's use of the oxygen as per the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to follow up with the pharmacy services for Resident 1's delivery of the breathing treatment medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's humidifier was labeled, dated, and changed when it was empty. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the resident's well-being as the necessary care and services were not provided. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration revised 10/2010 showed the following: 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. 2. Before administering oxygen, and while the resident is receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) attained and maintained the highest practicable physical well-being. * The facility failed to ensure the physician was timely notified when Resident 1 had a change in condition to theright leg. This failure posed the risk for Resident 1 to not receive the necessary care and services timely to maintain the resident's highest physical well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in Resident's Condition or Status revised February 2021 showed the facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/ mental condition and/ or status. Prior to notifying the physician or healthcare provider, the nurse will make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider, including (for example) information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to treat and prevent the development of pressure injuries for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to provide the skin treatment to Resident 2 as ordered by the physician and developed a care plan to address Resident 2's Stage 3 pressure injury to the lumbosacral spine. These failures had the potential for Resident 2 to not receive the appropriate care and services to promote healing of the pressure ulcer. Findings: Review of facility's P&P titled Pressure Ulcers/ Skin Breakdown – Clinical Protocol revised February 2024 showed the nursing staff and practitioner will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure ulcers; for example, immobility, recent weight loss, and a history of pressure ulcer(s). The physician will assist the staff to identify the type (for example, arterial or stasis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P& P review, the facility failed to ensure five of five final sampled residents (Residents 5, 19, 64, 84, and 745) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from the unnecessary psychotropic medications. * There was no evidence of non-pharmacological interventions for Resident 745's use of quetiapine (antipsychotic medication), Ativan (antianxiety medication), duloxetine (antidepressant medication) and divalproex sodium (mood stabilizer medication). Additionally, the facility failed to monitor behavior and side effects for the use of Ativan and failed to reassess the resident for use of quetiapine as needed more than 14 days. * The facility failed to show the Xanax (antianxiety medication) medication was only limited to 14 days for Resident 84. Additionally, the informed consent for the use of the Xanax medication was not completed prior to administration, and there was no evidence of non-pharmacological interventions for use of Remeron (antidepressant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the infection control practices designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The facility failed to ensure the facility had monthly Infection Prevention and Control Surveillance logs for July, September, and December 2024. * The facility failed to ensure the facility's infection surveillance log for August through November 2024 included if the resident met the Loeb's criteria for true infection. * The facility failed to ensure the October and November 2024 Infection Prevention and Control QA Reports were accurate. * The facility failed to ensure the facility had a surveillance log to show the residents who met and not met the Loeb's criteria. * The IP failed to include residents with signs and symptoms of infection but were not prescribed with antibiotic on the infection surveillance report. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 694's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 24 and 394) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 74) were safe to self-administer the medications found at bedside. * Resident 394 was observed with a bottle of dorzolamide (medication used to treat glaucoma) eyedrops at bedside. Resident 394 stated she administered the eyedrops herself. Resident 394 did not have the assessment and physician's order addressing the resident's self-administration of medication. * Resident 74 was observed with a medication cup containing a gabapentin (anticonvulsant medication) capsule at bedside. Resident 74 stated the charge nurse left the medication for her to self-administer the medication later. Resident 74 did not have the assessment, and physician's order addressing the resident's self-administration of medication. * Resident 24 was observed to have a Vicks VapoRub (cough suppressant and topical analgesic) ointment at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the reasonable accommodations to meet the needs for two of 29 final sampled residents (Residents 5 and 48) and four nonsampled residents (Residents 9, 29, 35, and 38). * The facility failed to ensure the call lights were within reach and accessible for Residents 5, 9, 29, 35, 38, and 83. This failure had the potential to result in a delay in the provision of care and the potential to negatively impact the residents' psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Answering the Call Lights (undated) showed the purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs, and to ensure the call light is accessible to the resident when in bed, from the toilet, from the shower or bathing facility, and from the floor. 1. On 1/7/25 at 0837 hours, Resident 9 was observed in bed, yelling, and pointing to the window. The call light was observed clipped on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, facility document review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to respond to the concerns brought up by the residents during the Resident Council meetings. * The facility failed to show what facility administrative actions were taken to address the concerns from the Residents Council meetings on 7/11, 9/12, and 10/10/24, regarding the medications, snacks, and CNA interactions with the residents. This failure had the potential for the residents' identified issues to not be resolved, a delay in the provision of care, and a decline in quality of life for the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Grievances Complaint, Filing revised 4/2017 showed the following: - The Administrator and the staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and/or representative; - All grievances, complaints or recommendation stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be considered. Actions on such issues will be responded to in writing, including a rationale for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide the individualized and ongoing activity program to meet the needs and interests for two of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 5 and 22) and two nonsampled residents (Residents 9 and 35). * The facility failed to provide the activities for Residents 9 and 22 which met the residents' identified interests. * The facility failed to ensure the bingo game was not cut-off by the activity department to supervise the smokers as per the concerns of Residents 5 and 35. These failures had the potential for the residents to experience feelings of social isolation and depression. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Activity Programs revised 6/2018 showed the following: - Activities offered are based on the comprehensive resident-centered assessment and the preferences of each resident; - The activities program is ongoing and includes facility-organized group activities, independent individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 64) was provided with the prescribed liquid consistency diet per the physician's order. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 64's health condition and well- being. Findings: On 1/7/25 at 0901 hours, during initial tour to the facility, a cup of thin clear liquid with a straw and a pitcher labeled with Resident 64's name and room number, Nectar, and dated 12/30/24 was observed on Resident 64's bedside table. CNA 5 was observed entering Resident 64's room and verified both the cup with thin liquid and the pitcher labeled Nectar was on Resident 64's bedside table. CNA 5 was then observed removing the cup with the thin liquid from the resident's bedside table. CNA 5 stated the thickened liquid with the nectar consistency was being given to the resident and proceeded to point at the pitcher labeled as Nectar. CNA 5 then opened the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for two of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 44 and 20) and two nonsampled residents (Residents 97 and 99) reviewed for respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 44's nasal cannula was applied properly. * The facility failed to ensure the oxygen cannula for Resident 97 was stored in a set-up bag when not in use, and ensure a physician's order was obtained prior to administering oxygen to the resident. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a No Smoking/Oxygen in Use sign was posted outside the resident's door per the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to ensure the nebulizer mask and canister for Resident 99 was stored in a set-up bag when not in use. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 20's nebulizer mask and canister was stored in a sanitary manner. These failures had the potential to affect the respiratory health and well-being of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to accurately monitor the fluid intake and output for one final sampled resident (Resident 394) reviewed for hemodialysis care. This failure had the potential for Resident 394 to experience life threatening conditions associated with fluid deficit/overload. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Intake and Output, Monitoring revised 1/2024 showed the following: - It is the policy of the facility to ensure the intake and output is monitored and accurately documented when it is ordered by the resident's physician or implemented by the licensed nurse or IDT to evaluate hydration, fluid restrictions, or assist in assessment and management of fluid needs; - Nursing personnel are responsible for recording on the Intake and Output Record as appropriate for each resident under their care; and - Nursing personnel are responsible are responsible to add intake and output amounts to the UDA Task throughout their shift. Other staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the IP had specific competencies and standard of practice skill sets needed to provide the safe and efficient nursing services to the residents as evidenced by: * The IP failed to identify the six moments of EBP. * The IP failed to document the meeting minutes on the Infection Control Committee Meeting Minutes form. * The IP failed to correctly identify HAI and CAI. * The IP failed to identify what the infection onset date was for. * The IP failed to provide accurate information on the Antibiotic Time Out to Resident 694's physician. * The facility failed to ensure CNA 8 and LVN 6 were competent about EBP. CNA 8 and LVN 6 were not able to identify when to use EBP and were not provided with training on EBP. These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for services not provided in a safe and competent manner. Findings: Review of the Position Summary section of the IP's job description…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of five final sampled residents (Residents 84) reviewed for unnecessary medications was properly monitored related to the use opioid medication. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 84 was monitored for the side effects of receiving Norco (narcotic) medication. This failure had the potential for Resident 84 to receive unnecessary medications and develop significant side effects. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pain - clinical protocol dated 10/2022 showed the staff and physician will monitor for adverse effects of pain medications such as gastrointestinal bleeding from NSAIDs, and anorexia, confusion, lethargy, and severe constipation related to opioids. Medical record review for Resident 84 was initiated on 1/7/25. Resident 84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 84's H&P examination dated 12/2/24, showed the resident had capacity to make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. * The facility's medication error rate was 23.33%. Three of three licensed nurses (LVNs 1, 2, and 3) were found to have made errors during the medication administration observation for one sampled resident (Resident 745) and two non-sampled residents (Residents 29 and 32). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's heal outcomes. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration dated 4/2019 showed the medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medication through a Metered Dose Inhaler revised 10/2010 showed the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of inhaled medication. Assess the resident, if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (final sampled resident, Resident 745) was free from the significant medication errors. This failure placed Resident 745 at risk for medical complications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration dated 4/2019 showed the medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Ordering and Receiving from Pharmacy date 4/2008 showed to reorder medication five days in advance of the need to assure for an adequate supply is on hand. Medical record review for Resident 745 was initiated on 1/7/25. Resident 745 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 745's Order Summary Report dated 1/7/25, showed the following physician orders: - dated 12/19/24, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 1/7/25 at 0834 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, a bag containing several wound dressings, a tube of CalProtect topical ointment and two tubes of Triad hydrophilic wound ointment was observed on Resident 82's nightstand. Resident 82 stated she did not know anything about the wound dressing and wound care ointments, and the nurse applied those to her right leg wound. Medical record review for Resident 82 was initiated on 1/7/25. Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 82's Order Summary Report dated 1/8/25, showed the following physician's orders: - dated 12/13/24, for the left lower leg with dry and scaly skin, cleanse with normal saline, apply with moisturizing cream and leave open to air; - dated 12/13/24, for the right lower leg with dry and scaly skin, cleanse with normal saline, apply with moisturizing cream and leave open to air; - dated 12/26/24, for the right posterior/ lateral lower leg peripheral arterial disease wound, cleanse with normal saline,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when: * The facility failed to ensure two coffee pots were not stored wet. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment and utensils were maintained in a sanitary condition. * The facility failed to ensure the food preparation sink had a back flow prevention in place. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses for residents receiving kitchen services in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Diet Type Report dated 1/7/25, showed 89 of 92 residents were receiving food prepared from the kitchen. 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 4-901.11, Equipment and Utensils, Air-Drying Required, items must be allowed to drain and to air-dry before being stacked or stored. Stacking wet items prevents them from drying and may allow an environment where microorganism can begin to grow. On 1/7/25 at 0800 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (final sampled, Resident 52) reviewed for hospice services had received the necessary care and services. * The facility failed to ensure the hospice visit calendar was available in Resident 52's residents' medical record. * The facility failed to ensure for an accurate documentation of the hospice staff visits were available for Resident 52. * The facilty failed to ensure the hospice staff visited the resident as scheduled in the hospice calendar for Resident 52. These failures posed the risk for the delay in communication and provision of hospice care between the hospice provider and facility . Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Hospice Services Agreement with Hospice Provider A dated 2/23/23, showed: - The hospice provider will ensure that patient's visit will be made at a time mutually agreed upon by provider and patient. - The hospice provider will ensure complete…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their Antibiotic Stewardship Program when the IP was not able to show the documentation she notified the physician of the residents who were prescribed antibiotics and did not meet the Loeb's Criteria. This failure had the potential for inaccurately identifying for true infections and potentially inhibited residents from receiving the appropriate treatment and care. Findings: According to the CDC, the antibiotics are some of the most commonly prescribed medications in nursing homes. Over the course of a year, up to 70% of nursing home residents get an antibiotic. Roughly 40% to 75% of antibiotics are prescribed incorrectly. In nursing homes, high rates of antibiotics are prescribed to prevent urinary tract infection (UTI) and respiratory tract infection (RTI). Prescribing antibiotics before there is an infection often contributes to misuse. Often residents are given antibiotics just because they are colonized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to protect the resident's rights to be free from physical abuse by a staff for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). * CNA 2 was observed by her colleague slapping Resident 1 on the face,resulting in redness to Resident 1's face. Resident 1 stated the incident made him feel embarrassed. This failure had the potential to cause serious injury and physical and/or psychological harm to the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Rights revised 2/2021 showed employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Federal and State laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to be treated with respect, kindness, dignity and be free from abuse. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 7/17/24. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three closed record sampled residents reviewed for discharges (Resident 1) was properly discharged from the facility after his elopement. * Resident 1 was found after his elopement from the facility and transported to an acute hospital for evaluation. Resident 1 was cleared to transfer back to the facility; however, the facility denied Resident 1's readmission. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for decline in his health condition if placed inappropriately. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Transfer or Discharge Documentation revised 12/2026 showed when a resident is transferred or discharged from the facility, the following information will be documented in the medical record: a. the basis for the transfer or discharge; if the resident is being transferred or discharged because his or her needs cannot be met at the facility, documentation will include: the specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents reviewed for elopement (Resident 1) was provided adequate supervision and necessary services to prevent elopement. * The facility failed to monitor Resident 1's whereabouts, resulting in Resident 1 leaving the facility undetected twice. * The facility failed to reassess Resident 1 for elopement risk as per the IDT's recommendations after an elopement episode. * The facility failed to monitor Resident 1 for his exiting behaviors. These failures placed Resident 1 at risk to not receive the appropriate care and services and placed the resident at risk for harm or injury. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Wandering and Elopements (undated) showed the facility will identify the residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for the residents. Review of the facility P&P titled Tab Alarms, Bed Alarms,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to coordinate the transportation for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1)'s ortho surgery appointment. * Resident 1's physician ordered an ortho surgery appointment; however, the facility failed to coordinate the transportation services in a timely manner. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having missed his ortho surgery appointment, which had the potential to delay Resident 1's plan of care. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 2/7/24. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's Occupational Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated 12/24/23, showed Resident 1 had a recent history of right tibia/fibula fracture status post ORIF with external fixator. Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 1/17/24, for an ortho surgery appointment on 1/23/24 at 1030 hours. Review of Resident 1's Social Service Note dated 1/19/24 at 1717 hours, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations to meet the needs for two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 4). * The facility failed to ensure Residents 1 and 4 were provided with assistance in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's physical and psychosocial well-being or would result in delayed provision of care. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Accommodation of Needs revised 3/2021 showed the facility's environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the resident in maintaining and/or achieving safe independent functioning, dignity, and well-being. The resident's individual needs and preferences are accommodated to the extent possible, except when the health and safety of the individual or other residents wound be endangered. Review of the facility's P&P titled Answering the Call Light revised 9/2022 showed the purpose of the procedure is to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident 1) remained free from accident hazards. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 1's smoking materials were not stored at the resident's bedside. This failure had the potential for the resident to sustain accidents and/or injuries. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Smoking Policies and Procedures (undated) showed residents without independent smoking privileges may not have or keep any types of smoking articles, including cigarettes, tobacco, etc., except when they are under direct supervision. On 9/28/23 at 1323 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 was observed lying in bed with the nasal cannula (device used to provide supplemental oxygen therapy) inside his nostrils and the oxygen concentrator was on and set at 4 liters per minute. Resident 1 was observed with two boxes of cigarettes and one lighter inside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to protect one of two sampled residents' (Resident 1) rights to be free from the physical abuse when Resident 2 had punched Resident 1's face after an altercation, resulting in Resident 1's abrasion on his nose to reopen and bleed. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated 2001, showed the residents have the rights to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation, and must protect residents from abuse by anyone, including other residents. Review of the facility's Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse (SOC 341) form dated 8/12/23, showed Resident 1 was physically abused by Resident 2. Review of the facility's Resident Abuse Investigation Report Form dated 8/12/23, showed the housekeeping staff had witnessed Resident 1 and 2's altercation in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to develop and implement the plan of care for assessing, monitoring, and intervening aggressions towards other residents for one of two residents (Resident 2) who had a reported allegation of resident-to-resident abuse. This failure had the potential to delay providing the safeguard measures to protect the residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's investigation conclusion dated 8/17/23, showed Residents 1 and 2 had an altercation on 8/12/23. Resident 1 hit Resident 2 in the arm, and then Resident 2 hit back by punching Resident 1's face, causing Resident 1's nose to bleed. Review of Resident 2's medical record was initiated on 8/21/23. Resident 2 was initially admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 2 was transferred out on 8/18/23, to the acute care hospital for physical aggression towards staff and others. Review of Resident 2's H&P exam dated 7/12/23, showed Resident 2 was competent and able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary condition in the kitchen as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure safe storage of food items. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was maintained in sanitary condition. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the form CMS-672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility dated 8/16/22, showed 93 of the 96 residents residing in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1.a. On 8/16/22 at 0819 hours, an initial observation of the freezer and concurrent interview was conducted with the DSS. On the third shelf from the top, a plastic bag of barbeque ribs was observed with the use by date of 7/25/22. The DSS verified the observation and stated the barbeque ribs had expired. The DSS stated it should have been discarded. b. On 8/16/22 at 0835 hours, during the initial kitchen observation and concurrent interview with the DSS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate infection control practices designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of infections were implemented as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure eye protection was worn by the staff as PPE during all resident care in accordance with the Orange County Health Care Agency's Guidance on COVID-19 in long-term care facilities. This failure posed the risk of a COVID-19 outbreak at the facility. * The facility failed to ensure LVN 5 performed hand hygiene and changed gloves when administering the eye drops for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 16) as per the facility's P&P. This failure had the potential for the resident to acquire an eye infection. Findings: 1. Review of the Orange County Health Care Agency Guidance on COVID-19 in long-term care facilities titled Some Reminders and Updates From your Local Health Department dated 8/9/22, showed Important IP (infection prevention) Reminders: Eye protection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the staff provided care in a manner that promoted dignity and respect for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 54). CNA 1 was observed standing over Resident 54 while assisting the resident with her meal. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: On 8/16/22 at 1224 hours, CNA 1 was observed assisting Resident 54 with her lunch meal in the resident's room. Resident 54 was observed lying in the bed with the head of bed elevated. The bed was observed in a low position. Resident 54's lunch tray was observed on top of the resident's night stand. CNA 1 was observed standing over Resident 54 while spoon-feeding the resident. Resident 54's eye level was at CNA 1's waist area. Resident 54 was observed looking up, trying to make eye contact with CNA 1 as she was being fed. CNA 1 lifted the plate with one hand and continued feeding Resident 54 while standing over the resident. An over bed table and a chair were observed on the opposite side of the resident's bed. CNA 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 16) was assessed to determine if the resident was safe to self-administer the medications. This failure had the potential for medication interactions and inappropriate use of medications. * Aspercreme Lidocaine dry spray (pain reliever medication) with an expiration date of 08/2021 and Icy Hot Max-maximum strength/Lidocaine roll on (pain reliever medication) with an expiration of 12/2023 were unlabeled and observed at Resident 16's bedside table. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medications revised 2/2021 showed the residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that is was clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was kept within reach for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 73). This failure resulted in Resident 73 not being able to use the call light to call for assistance, which had the potentail to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Answering the Call Light revised March 2021 showed when the resident is in bed or confined to a chair, be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. On 8/16/22 at 0820 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 73 was overheard moaning while lying in bed. Resident 73's call light was observed on the floor, not within the resident's reach. Resident 73 was observed asking for help. On 8/16/22 at 0823 hours, CNA 2 who was observed sitting at the nurse's station was summoned to Resident 73's room. CNA 2 verified the call light was on the floor and not within the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to offer assistance to formulate an advance directive, and/or maintain a copy of the resident's advance directive in the medical records for five of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 18, 29, 38, 54, and 595). This failure put the residents at risk of not having their wishes for treatment known and had the potential for the residents' decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment options not being honored. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directives revised December 2016 showed upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. Information on whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record. 1. Medical record review for Resident 38 was initiated on 8/16/22. Resident 38 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 594) was provided with comfortable and homelike environment. This failure had the potential to prevent Resident 594 from getting a restful sleep and be free unwanted noise in his room. Findings: On 08/22/22 at 1000 hours, during observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 594. Resident 594 stated his roommate had the TV on at an uncomfortable sound level from 0700 hours to midnight since his admission to the facility on [DATE]. When asked if he had informed anyone regarding his concern of the loud TV, Resident 594 stated he had told, 10 plus nurses, on 8/4/22. Resident 594 stated no one had done anything about it; he added, I just gave up on it and stopped complaining to the staff. When asked how the TV sound level made him feel, Resident 594 stated, I feel like a nervous wreck. Medical record review for Resident 594 was initiated on 8/16/22. Resident 594 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care to reflect the individual care needs for two of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 74 and 78). * The facility failed to develop a care plan problem to address Resident 74's risk for developing pressure ulcers. * The facility failed to ensure a care plan problem was developed to address Resident 78's use of the PRAFO boots for wound management. These posed the risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to the residents. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 74 was initiated on 8/16/22. Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 4/4/22, to offload Resident 74's bilateral lower extremities using pillows while he was in bed. Review of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk dated 7/22/22, showed Resident 74 was at risk for developing pressure injuries. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the highest physical well-being for two of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 74 and 78). * The facility failed to ensure the PRAFO boots was applied to Resident 78 as per physician's order. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 74's right arm sling was applied when he was out of bed as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential to affect Residents 74 and 78's well being. Findings: 1. Medical record review was initiated for Resident 78 on 8/16/22. Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Order Summary Report for the month of August 2022 showed an order dated 8/11/22, to apply PRAFO boot to Resident 78's right heel while in bed for wound management. On 8/16/22 at 0831 hours and 8/18/22 at 0812 hours, Resident 78 was observed in bed with a dressing on the right heel and his leg was elevated on a pillow. There was no heel protector or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 74). * The facility failed to offload Resident 74's heels from pressure as ordered by the physician. This had the potential of Resident 74 not receiving the appropriate care and services to promote healing or prevent the development of the pressure ulcers. Findings: On 8/16/22 at 1444 hours, Resident 74 was observed lying in bed. Resident 74's heels were not offloaded and were observed resting directly on the mattress. Medical record review for Resident 74 was initiated on 8/16/22. Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 4/4/22, to offload Resident 74's bilateral lower extremities using pillows while he was in bed. Review of Resident 74's history and physical examination dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 594) was provided appropriate pain management. This created the risk of not effectively manage pain for this resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled, Pain Assessment and Management, revised date March 2020, showed pain management interventions shall reflect the sources, type and severity of pain and monitor for the presence of adverse consequences to treatment. Medical record review for Resident 594 was initiated on 8/16/22. Resident 594 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnosis of lower limb cellulitis. On 08/17/22 at 1332 hours, during an interview, Resident 594 was asked about his pain levels. Resident 594 stated he had pain during dressing changes and had been given Ibuprofen (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication). However, Resident 594 stated he could not sleep when he took it and had told the nurse. Review of Resident 594's MAR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-23 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive bed/side rail assessment for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 44). This failure had the potential to cause physical harm to Resident 44. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Proper Use of Side Rails revised December 2016 showed the guidelines to ensure the safe use of side rails included the consent, assessment, and care planning of the resident. Medical record review for Resident 44 was initiated on 8/16/22. Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 8/22/22 at 1458 hours, during the tourof the facility, Resident 44 was observed with an upper bilateral half side rails up on his bed. Resident 44 was asked about the purpose of his side rails and stated he used the side rails to transfer in/out of bed. Review of Resident 44's Side Rail Utilization assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 44 had had the side rails in place since 6/29/22, for transfers and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 16). * The facility failed to ensure the physician's orders were obtained for the use of the topical analgesics found at Resident 16's bedside table. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 16's pain not to be managed completely and could lead to the resident's decreased concentration or sleep disturbance. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 4/2019 showed the medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Medical record review for Resident 16 was initiated on 8/18/22. Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 16's Order Summary Report dated 7/6/22, failed to show the physician's orders for Aspercreme Lidocaine spray and Icy Hot max-maximum strength/Lidocaine roll on. On 8/18/22 at 0849 hours, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medication prescription inserts review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were stored and labeled properly in one of four medication carts (Medication Cart 1); and failed to ensure an expired medication was not stored at the bedside for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 16). * Three inhalers with no opened dates were stored in Medication Cart 1. * An expired medication was observed at Resident 16's bedside table. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: 1. Review of the medication prescription inserts for Advair Diskus (medication to prevent symptoms of asthma and COPD) from www.drugs.com showed to discard Advair Diskus one month after opening the foil pouch or when the counter reads 0 (after all blisters have been used), whichever comes first. Review of the medication prescription inserts for Breztri Aerosphere (medication to treat COPD) from www.drugs.com showed to discard the medication when the dose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records for two of 19 final sampled residents (Residents 16 and 54) were accurate and complete. * Resident 54's POLST was incompletely filled out. * Resident 16's medical record contained Resident 56's Order Summary Report. These failures had the potential for the residents' care needs not being met as their medical information was inaccurate and incomplete. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 54 was initiated on [DATE]. Resident 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the History and Physical examination dated [DATE], showed Resident 54 was not competent and not able to enter into a contract, including admission agreement. Review of Resident 54's POLST dated [DATE], showed the attempt resuscitation/CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) option was checked off. The physician signed the POLST. However, all other areas including medical interventions (selecting the treatment when the patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure two glucometers (Glucometers A and B) from one of four medication carts (Medication Cart 1) were maintained in safe operating condition. This had the potential for residents requiring glucose checks to have inaccurate readings. Findings: Review of the Assure Platinum Blood Glucose Monitoring System Instruction Manual, under Quality Checks, showed to use Assure Dose Control Solutions to check if the meter and test strips are working correctly as a system, and if the test is correct. A control solution test is performed when a new bottle of test strips is opened. On 8/23/22 at 1057 hours, Medication Cart 1 inspection was conducted with LVN 6. Two glucometers were observed inside the top drawer labeled Glucometer A and Glucometer B. The bottle of Assure Platinum Blood Glucose Test Strips was observed with an opened date of 8/22/22, and Lot No. 051622A. A bottle of control solution was observed with the control solution range for normal was 86-107 mg/dL, and the control solution range for high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive person centered care plan to reflect the individualized care needs of one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 3). * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address the skin discoloration on Resident 3's bilateral hand. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 3 not receiving appropriate, consistent, and individualized care and monitoring.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered (undated) showed comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. On 4/7/26 at 0954 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 3 was observed sitting in her wheelchair with visible skin discoloration on both hands. Medical record review for Resident 3 was initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive plans of care to reflect the individual care needs for residents (Residents 1 and 2). * The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Residents 1and 2 addressing the incident when Resident 1was grazed to his right cheek by Resident 2who was confused. This failure had the potential risk of not providing the appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to the residents. Findings: Review of facility's P&P titled Care Planning – Interdisciplinary Team (undated), showed the facility's Care Planning/ Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans- Comprehensive (undated) showed an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and medical record review the facility failed to provide the clean, sanitary, and homelike environment for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 64). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: On at 1/8/25 at 0918 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, the wall by Resident 64's head of bed was observed to have scattered chipped paint. On 1/9/25 at 0754 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director. The Maintenance Director touched the chipped paint on Resident 64's wall and stated, I have not seen this before. The Maintenance Director acknowledged the findings. On 1/9/25 at 0807 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with CNA 5. When ask about the chipped paint on Resident 64's wall, CNA 5 stated it's been there for a week, but I always forget to report it, my focus was on the resident. CNA 5 verified the above findings. On 1/10/25 at 1501 hours, an interview was conducted with the Administrator and DON. The Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-01-10 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to notify one of two residents (final sampled resident, Resident 44) reviewed for hospitalization of their right to a bed hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident in the acute care hospital) policy upon transfer to the acute care facility. This failure had the potential for Resident 44 and/or his representative to be unaware of their rights to request a bed hold upon transfer. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Bed Holds and Returns revised 10/2022 showed the residents and/or representatives are informed (in writing) of the facility and state (if applicable) bed-hold policies. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation section showed: - All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-01-10 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the PASARR (a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) Level 1 assessment was coded accurately for one of three final sampled residents reviewed for PASARR (Resident 52). This failure had the potential for having residents that were not appropriate in the facility and for Resident 52 not to receive the appropriate services. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 52 was initiated on 1/7/25. Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 52's PASARR Level 1 Screening Form dated 6/21/24, showed Resident 52 had no prescribed psychotropic medications for mental illness. However, review of Resident 52's Order Summary Report dated 1/9/25, showed Resident 52 had the physician's orders dated 6/21/24, to administer Zyprexa (antipsychotic medication) 5 mg by mouth two times a day for agitation, and lorazepam…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 75). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the health of the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans - Baseline revised 3/2022 showed the baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care and must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident. Medical record review for Resident 75 was initiated on 1/7/25. Resident 75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 75's MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 75 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident 75's Order Summary Report for January 2025 showed a physician's order dated 11/22/24, for FC FR #16/30 cc to BSD due to diagnosis of urinary retention (difficulty urinating and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs for one nonsampled resident (Resident 794). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 794's order for methylphenidate (stimulant) was administered as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health and well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration dated 4/2019 showed the medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. The medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Medical record review for Resident 794 was initiated on 1/7/25. Resident 794 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 794's H&P examination dated 12/28/24, showed the resident was competent and able to make decisions. Review of Resident 794's Order Summary Report dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-01-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the Pharmacy Consultant followed up on the monthly MRR for one of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (final sampled resident, Resident 19). This failure had the potential to cause unsafe medication doses and adverse medication reactions that can jeopardize medically compromised residents. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Executive Summary of Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review dated 12/11/24, showed Resident 19's medication regimen was reviewed by Pharmacy Consultant during the period of 12/1/24 to 12/11/24. Further review of the Resident 19's medical records failed to show if the monthly MRR for Resident 19 for December 2024 had recommendations or if the MRR for Resident 19 was completed with no recommendations. On 1/10/25 at 1543 hours, a concurrent interview and facility document review was conducted with RN 2. RN 2 verified the monthly MRR was conducted for Resident 19 during the period of 12/1/24 to 12/11/24. RN 2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food served to the residents was palatable. * The cooked broccoli was mushy in texture. This failure had the potential for the residents to not eat the food served and could affect their nutritional status. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Diet Type Report dated 1/7/25, showed 89 of 92 residents were receiving food prepared from the kitchen. Review of the facility's Menu showed on 1/8/24, the noon meal selection included Seas Broccoli Florets (edible flower-shaped pieces of a brocolli). Review of the facility's document titled Seas Broccoli Florets (undated) showed to place the broccoli in a steamer or stockpot with water and to cook until tender but not mushy. On 1/7/25 at 1022 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 5. Resident 5 stated the food in the facility did not taste good. Medical record review for the Resident 5 was initiated on 1/7/25. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical records for one of 19 final sampled residents (Resident 24) and one of three closed record residents (Resident 92) were complete and accurately documented. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 24's POLST was signed by the legal decisionmaker. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 92's Vital Signs Summary was accurate. These failures had the potential for the residents' needs not being met as the medical information were incomplete and inaccurate. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Charting and Documentation revised 7/2017 showed all the services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the frozen storage area inside the residents' refrigerator, located in Station B was free of ice buildup. This failure had the potential for the food stored in the freezer area to not maintain the proper temperature. Findings: On 1/7/25 at 0846 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with RN 1. The only refrigerator in the facility to store the residents' food located in Station B was observed with the ice buildup in the frozen storage area. The frozen storage area was observed inside residents' refrigerator with no separate door for the frozen storage area. The food for a resident was observed stored in the refrigerator. RN 1 verified the observations and stated the above refrigerator needed to be defrosted. On 1/9/25 at 1445 hours, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON was informed and acknowledged the above findings.
- No harm found · B2022-08-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage and refuse were properly stored in one of one garbage dumpster. * The lid of the facility's garbage dumpster was left open. This failure had the potential to harbor pests or rodents which carry diseases. Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 2017, 5-501.113, Covering Receptacles, the receptacles and waste handling units for refuse shall be kept covered (B) with tight-fitting lids. Review of the facility's P&P titled Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal revised 10/2017 showed the outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter. On 8/18/22 at 1030 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the DSS. The garbage dumpster located outside of the facility adjacent to the kitchen were observed with the lid open. The dumpster lid was observed on the side of the dumpster. The DSS verified the findings and stated the dumpster should have been covered with the lid.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WIN WIN ENTERPRISES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 57% | since 02/01/2022 |
| DANIEL WINTNER 2020 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 23, 2020 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2022 |
| ELIZABETH WINTNER 2020 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 23,2020 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2022 |
| JEREMY WINTNER 2020 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 23, 2020 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2022 |
| MARK WINTNER 2020 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 23, 2020 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2022 |
| PHILLIP WINTNER 2020 IRREVOCABLE GIFT TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 23, 2020 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2022 |
| SHERRY LATT LOWY LIVING TRUST UTD JULY 31, 1992 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/22/2002 |
| WINTNER, DANIEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2022 |
| WINTNER, ELIZABETH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2022 |
| WINTNER, JEREMY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2022 |
| WINTNER, MARK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2022 |
| WINTNER, PHILLIP | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/01/2022 |
| WINTNER, FRANCINE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/22/2002 |
| WINTNER, JACOB | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/22/2002 |
| KOONTZ, ROBERT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/07/2021 |
| KUIZON, KRISTINA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| SALAZAR, PAULINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/14/2020 |
| HASSELL, LANCE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/25/2022 |
| 861 SOUTH HARBOR BLVD. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2022 |
| CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2025 |
| PREFERRED BANK | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/24/2025 |
| PROFESSIONAL DIRECTIONS FOR HEALTH CARE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/23/2013 |
| BUTENKO, JULIE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/24/2023 |
| CAPELA, HEIDI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/03/2023 |
| LUTZ, LINDA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2012 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055742. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.