Highland Care Center of Redlands
700 E Highland Ave, Redlands, CA 92374 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (909) 793-2678 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.7% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.9% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.1% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 22.2% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.64 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.78 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 143 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 41.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.6%CMS range 42.6–57.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 9.1–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.4%CMS range 6.0–14.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 75.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.30 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.53 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-11 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) was obtained and maintained for two out of four sampled residents (Resident 4 and 68) receiving psychotropic medications (medications affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors). This failure had the potential for residents and/or their representatives to make treatment decisions without being fully informed of the risks, benefits, alternatives, and potential adverse effects associated with psychotropic medications. Findings:1. A review of Resident 4's Order Summary Report, indicated Resident 4 had a physician order, dated 4/13/26, for quetiapine (generic for Seroquel, a psychotropic medication to treat mental illness) 25 milligrams (mg - unit of measurement) by mouth two times a day for psychosis manifested by mood swing. During a concurrent interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessments accurately reflected residents' status per Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI- comprehensive assessment and care planning process used by nursing home) guidelines for three of 24 sampled residents (Resident 68, 59, and 47) when:1. Resident 68's tobacco use in the annual comprehensive assessment was not accurately coded.2. Resident 59's restorative nursing program was not coded accurately in the recent quarterly assessment.3. Resident 47's visual abilities in the latest quarterly assessment were not accurately coded. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 68, 59 and 47 not to receive the necessary care, treatment, and/or services to attain their highest practicable level of functioning.Findings: 1.A review of Resident 68's admission RECORD (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate and timely collaboration and coordination with the contracted hospice agency for one of two sampled residents (Resident 52) when:1. Resident 52's vaccines were not coordinated for timely administration.2. Resident 52's hospice nursing assessments in the hospice binder were not readily available to facility staff.3. The hospice agency did not have a copy of Resident 52's comprehensive plan of care from the facility.These failures resulted in the delay of care and had the potential to cause miscommunication among staff and unmanaged health concerns for Resident 52. Findings:1. A review of Resident 52's admission RECORD (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) dated 6/11/26, indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (loss of mental function such as thinking, memory, and reasoning skills), encounter for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure needed treatment and services were provided to maintain range of motion (ROM- full movement potential of a joint) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 59) when Resident 59's Restorative Nursing Program (a nursing-driven service in long-term care settings that helps residents maintain or improve their functional abilities to their highest possible level) orders were not followed in accordance with Resident 59's plan of care.These failures had the potential to cause further decline in functional mobility, ROM, and quality of life for Resident 59.Findings:During an initial tour observation on 6/8/26, at 9:30 AM, inside Resident 59's room, Resident 59 was awake, verbally responsive, with bilateral lower leg orthotics (medical devices designed to support, align, or correct the function of a body part on both sides) while lying in bed. Resident 59 stated she was paralyzed on the left side of her body.A review of Resident 59's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a resident discharge for one of three sampled discharged residents (Resident 80).This failure had the potential to limit ombudsman involvement and advocacy related to Resident 80's discharge. Findings:A review of Resident 80s admission Record indicated Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnoses, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia ( Lungs cannot adequately transfer oxygen into the blood stream),Type II Diabetes Mellitus (a long term condition that causes high blood sugar levels) without complications , Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure that does not have a single identifiable medical cause).During a concurrent interview and record review on 06/11/26, at 9:15 AM, with Registered Nurse (RN 2), Resident 80's discharge records, dated 04/28/26, were reviewed. The discharge records indicated Notification Information- the facility must send a copy of this notice to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely completion and transmission of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessments in accordance with the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) federal completion timeframes for two of three sampled residents (Resident 33 and 72) reviewed for Resident Assessments when:1. Resident 33's discharge MDS assessment was not done.2. Resident 72's quarterly MDS assessment was not transmitted after completion. These failures had the potential to result in inadequate monitoring of Residents 33 and 72's progress and decline, and the lack of resident specific information to CMS for payment and quality measure monitoring.Findings:1. A review of Resident 33's admission RECORD (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) dated 6/11/26, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia (a severe brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for oxygen administration for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 82).This failure had the potential to prevent Resident 82 from receiving individualized respiratory care and treatment.Findings:A review of Resident 82's admission Record (demographic information), indicated Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (inadequate oxygen supply in the blood), pneumonia (infection/inflammation in lungs) and pleural effusion (when the fluid collects in the space around the lungs).A review of Resident 82's Order Summary Report (physician's orders) dated 6/2/26, indicated, Oxygen at 4 liter/minute [LPM- a unit that expresses flow rate] via nasal cannula [a flexible tube that delivers oxygen through the nose] continuously every shift.A review of Resident 82's Medication Administration Record for the month of June, indicated the oxygen at 4 LPM via nasal cannula…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed when:1. For one of five residents observed during medication administration (Resident 84), nursing staff failed to identify and clarify a physician order for enoxaparin (an anticoagulant [blood thinner]) that specified intramuscular (injected into a muscle) administration, which was inconsistent with manufacturer instructions for subcutaneous (injection into the fatty tissue beneath the skin) administration.This failure had the potential to result in unresolved medication order discrepancies and inaccurate clinical documentation regarding the route of administration, and medication administration inconsistent with the physician order and manufacturer instructions. The incorrect intramuscular order also had the potential to increase the risk of bleeding and hematoma (a collection of blood under the skin or within tissue that may cause swelling, bruising, and pain) formation if administered by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for oxygen administration and place an oxygen in use sign outside the room, in accordance with the oxygen administration policy for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident 82).This failure had the potential to result in ineffective oxygen therapy, potential respiratory distress, or compromised safety for Resident 82. Findings:A review of Resident 82's admission Record (demographic information), indicated Resident 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (inadequate oxygen supply in the blood), pneumonia (infection/inflammation in lungs) and pleural effusion (when fluid collects in the space around the lungs).A review of Resident 82's Order Summary Report (physician's orders) dated 6/11/26, indicated an order for Oxygen at 4 liter/minute [LPM- a unit that expresses flow rate] via nasal cannula [tubing that delivers oxygen through the nose] continuously…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 52) was assessed for the appropriate use of grab bars (safety devices anchored to bed to provide stability, maintain balance and prevent falls) based on acceptable standards of practice and per facility policy.This failure placed Resident 52 at risk for entrapment (an event in which resident was caught, trapped, or entangled in the tight spaced around the bed) and injury from the use of the affixed grab bars.Findings:A review of Resident 52's admission RECORD (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) dated 6/11/26, indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (loss of mental function such as thinking, memory, and reasoning skills), encounter for palliative care (specialized medical care for anyone living with a serious illness), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of controlled substances (medications with a high potential for abuse and dependence) for one of five randomly selected residents reviewed for controlled substance accountability (Resident 83). The facility's Controlled Drug Record (CDR - inventory records used to document receipt, use, and count of controlled substances did not match the Medication Administration Record (MAR- a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident).This failure resulted in inaccurate accountability of a controlled substance and had the potential to result in diversion (controlled substances used by someone other than the resident for whom the medication was prescribed) or misuse of controlled substances and compromised resident medication safety. Findings:During an inspection of Medication Cart 1 at Nursing Station A on 6/9/26 at 1:01 PM in the presence of Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 83's blister card (a type of medicine packaging where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove a discontinued medication from active medication storage in one of two medication rooms (Nursing Station A Medication Room).This failure had the potential to result in inadvertent administration of a discontinued medication. Findings: During a medication room inspection on 6/9/26 at 12:13 PM in the presence of the Director of Nursing (DON), a prefilled syringe of Spikevax 2025-2026 (COVID-19 vaccine) labeled for Resident 17 was observed in the medication refrigerator located in Nursing Station A Medication Room with a date of 5/14/26. A review of Resident 17's physician's telephone order, dated 5/13/26, indicated, Moderna COVID-19 Bivalent (a vaccine formulated to protect against two virus strains or variants) Intramuscular (injected into a muscle) Suspension (a liquid medication) 50 MCG/0.5ML (microgram per milliliter - unit of measurement).Inject 0.5 ml intramuscularly one time only for COVID VACCINE until 05/14/2026 23:59 (11:59 PM). A review of Resident 17's Medication Administration Record (MAR -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the lids of two of three dumpsters closed which exposed the trash inside.This failure had the potential to attract pests to the premises which could spread disease to residents and staff in the facility.Findings:During a concurrent observation tour and interview on 6/8/26, at 8:53 AM, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the facility's outside garbage area, two of three metal dumpsters were open. Several trash bags were exposed inside one dumpster and trash was observed in the other. The DS confirmed the lids of two metal dumpsters were left open and needed to be closed at all times to prevent harboring of pests. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food-Related Garbage and Refuse Disposal, revised 10/2017, indicated, 7. Outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policies and procedures (P&P), which were designed to prohibit misappropriation of resident property, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Certified Nurse Assistant 1 (CNA 1) took Resident 1's credit card out of the facility.This failure resulted in Resident 1 to receive fraudulent charges and violation of resident trust in facility safeguards.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), the face sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included partial intestinal obstruction (partial blockage of the intestines, but food, gas, and fluids can still get through) and muscle wasting (muscles are shrinking and getting weaker over time).During an interview on September 17, 2025, at 1:48 PM, with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she requested CNA 1 to buy cigarettes from a local store using Resident 1's own…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper care was provided to prevent a right heel pressure ulcer (an injury to the skin or underlying tissue that develop from prolonged pressure), for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure had the potential to place Resident 1, a clinically compromised resident, at risk for further skin breakdown, which could affect his health and safety.Findings:During a review of Residents 1's admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included muscle wasting and atrophy (a condition with shrinking and loss of muscle), major depressive disorder (a condition with feeling of sadness and hopelessness), fracture of unspecified part of right clavicle ( broken right collarbone where the specific location of the break has not been detailed), fracture of right ilium (a break in the upper largest part of the hip bone), spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 eloped from the facility without the facility ' s knowledge on March 12, 2025. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at increased risk for falls and injuries, heat or cold exposure, dehydration, and/or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (brain disorder that causes loss of memory, language, thinking abilities severe enough to interfere with daily life), hypertension (condition where the force of blood pushing against your artery walls is consistently too high), and mood affective disorder (mental health condition that affects your emotional state, causing long periods of extreme happiness or sadness). Further review indicated Resident 1 was in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen as required by the facility policy when: 1.The floors under equipment had accumulation of food crumbs, trash, and black grime (dirt). The food prep sink drain had residue build-up on the drainpipe and the wall. 2. The dry storage room had food crumbs and trash underneath shelves. The shelves had spill of a powder substance. 3. There were broken tiles, which provided a surface for an accumulation of food crumbs, in the dry storage room and in the main kitchen. 4. Food equipment (food processor, plate warmer, blender, and can opener) were stored with food crumbs and build up. 5. The clean utensil bins had food splash and crumbs. 6. The ice machine had black spots in the ice bin ceiling and yellow discoloration (change of natural color) in the ice chute (the part of the ice machine where ice drops into the ice bin). These failures have the potential to compromise food safety and increase the risk of foodborne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for two of eleven residents (Residents 40 and 475) reviewed for dining observation when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) was standing over Resident 40 while feeding her lunch on February 18, 2025. 2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 4) pulled Resident 475 while he was on his wheelchair into the dining room, with his feet dragging on the floor, on February 18, 2025. These failures resulted in staff not maintaining and enhancing Residents 40 and 475's individuality and dignity, and had the potential to devalue and dishonor their self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: 1. During an observation on February 18, 2025, at 12:54 PM, in the Memory Care Unit's dining room, LVN 2 was standing over Resident 40 while feeding her lunch. During an interview on February 19, 2025, at 4:45 PM, CNA 5 stated the job expectation when feeding residents was to perform hand hygiene before, sit down beside residents hand hygiene after. During an interview with the Registered Dietician (RD), on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policy for assistive device and equipment (tool that helps a person with disability perform daily tasks) was being implemented for one of four residents (Resident 8) reviewed for range of motion (ROM - full movement potential of a joint) when Resident 8's hand splint (device applied to prevent or reduce contractures) was not applied as ordered. This failure had the potential to cause further contractures (when muscles, tendons or skin around a joint become permanently tight and shortened) discomfort and loss functional mobility negatively impacting Resident 8's quality of life and increasing the risk for preventable physical deterioration and pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body), and hemiparesis (weakness or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (Resident 16) reviewed for respiratory received proper respiratory care in accordance with physicians' orders and professional standards of practice. Resident 16's oxygen tubing was found disconnected from the oxygen concentrator (medical device that provides extra oxygen) for approximately 15 minutes on February 18, 2025. This failure had the potential to cause respiratory distress, oxygen deprivation and other health complications due to insufficient oxygen supply, placing Resident 16's health at risk. Findings: During a review of Resident 16's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long-term condition that make it hard to breath), dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). During a review of Resident 16's Physician Orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records of controlled medications (also called narcotics; medications that are controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction) for one of three narcotic medication carts (Unit Station A Cart Number 2). This failure had the potential for a diversion (illegal distribution of controlled drugs for any illicit use) of controlled medications by staff in a highly vulnerable population of 38 residents, who are in Unit Station A. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on February 20, 2025, at 9:20 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the Unit Station A Cart Number 2's Narcotic Count Record (NCR -form used by the facility to verify counting of controlled medications at the change of shift by oncoming and off going licensed nurses), dated February 1, 2025, to February 20, 2025, was reviewed. The NCR indicated the following: a. On February 5, 2025, missing signature from the night shift (11:00 AM - 7:00 PM) off going shift. b. On February 12, 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policy for self-administration of medications was being implemented for one of four residents (Resident 50) reviewed for environment when Resident 50's self-administered medications were not stored in a safe and secure place. (Three white elongated pills were found in different areas in Resident 50's room.) This failure had the potential to place 72 medically compromised residents at risk for accidental ingestion or exposure to a medication that was not prescribed by the residents' physician. Findings: During a review of Resident 50's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 50 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (chronic autoimmune [the body fights itself] disease that affects the brain and spine), anemia (not having enough healthy red blood cells), and osteomyelitis (bone infection). During a review of Resident 50's Self-Administration of Medications Assessment, dated February 19, 2025, it indicated .6. Resident is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the diet ordered by the physician was followed for one of eleven residents (Resident 40) reviewed for dining observation when Resident 40 did not receive her physician ordered finger food diet (small, bite-sized foods that can be easily picked up and eaten with the fingers) for lunch on February 18, 2025. (Alternatively, Resident 40 received the regular diet.) This failure had the potential to result in Resident 40 to experience weight loss manifested by Resident 40 not meeting nutritional needs for 1 of 64 medically compromised residents who receive therapeutic food from the kitchen. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), it indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of dehydration (loss of fluid in the body), Alzheimer's disease (disease that destroys memory) and schizoaffective disorder (chronic mental health condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper and safe infection control practices were followed when: 1. Resident 10's oxygen nasal cannula tubing (device used to deliver oxygen into the nose via a tube) was found unlabeled and undated. 2. Resident 16's oxygen nasal cannula tubing was found unlabeled and undated. 3. A warm coffee cup was found on top of an intravenous (IV) medication cart (cart used for storage of intravenous medication solutions). These failures had the potential to result in cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful bacteria) causing a preventable infection to 72 highly vulnerable residents whose health conditions are already compromised. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), it indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (lungs are unable to exchange oxygen leading to low levels of oxygen in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition when: 1. One of three refrigerators in the kitchen had missing side screws on the front grill leading to a detachment (falling off). 2. Resident Refrigerator had condensation (excessive moisture or water) on the back wall. 3. The electrical panel in the memory care unit (units designed to prevent wandering and specialized care for people with memory loss) was found open and unlocked These failures had the potential to place the health and safety of 72 of 72 medically compromised residents at risk. It had the potential to cause food to not be cooled properly, compromising 64 residents who could receive food from these refrigerators. And it also had the potential to place 34 medically compromised memory care residents at risk for accidental electrical shock. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on February 18, 2025, at 8:10 AM, with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), Refrigerator # 1, which was near the main entrance to the kitchen, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident 28) reviewed for environment was provided with adequate access to their call light system when Resident 28's call light was not accessible. This failure had the potential to place Resident 28's health and safety at risk because it could lead to delayed care and increased risk of harm in an emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident's 28's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). During a review of Resident's 28's Care Plan for Risk for Fall/Injury, dated January 31, 2025, it indicated, Interventions .Call light within reach . During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered according to the facility ' s policies and procedures (P&P) for one of three sample resident (Resident 1) when Keppra (medication used to treat and prevent seizures—an abnormal electrical activity in the brain that temporarily affects consciousness, muscle control, and behavior) was not administration to Resident 1. This failure potentially has caused Resident 1, who is clinically compromised, being transferred to Hospital for Seizure evaluation on May 3, 2024. Findings: During the review of Resident 1 ' s admission record (a document that gives a summary of resident's information), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included Epilepsy (a brain condition where a person experience recurring seizures), and Hemiplegia (a condition that causes paralysis or weakness on one side of the body). During a review of Resident 1 record titled Change in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident Care Plan was fully implemented for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1was not placed closer to the nursing station as indicated in the plan of care as a specified intervention following a fall. This failure had the potential to put a clinically compromised resident (Resident 1) at risk for serious injury due to falling. Resulting in Resident 1falling and being transferred to a general acute hospital for evaluation and treatment of injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included repeated falls, degenerative disease of the nervous system (progressive conditions that occur when nerve cells in the brain or peripheral nervous system [part of your nervous system that lies outside the brain and spinal cord. It plays a key role in both sending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to return to the facility after a transfer to the hospital for evaluation. This failure resulted in the resident being denied reentry and being transferred to another acute hospital where he remains until new placement is found. Findings: During review of Residents 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include complication of ventricular intracranial shunt (shunt drains excess cerebrospinal fluid), hydrocephalus (buildup of fluid in the brain), muscle weakness, altered mental status (change in mental function delirium, dementia and psychosis) hypertension (high blood pressure). During a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 1 ' s Medical Record with the Administrator, reviewed are as follows: 1. Phone Order dated December 05, 2023, at 18:28: Resident may send out to Acute Hospital for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to monitor the whereabouts for one of six sampled residents (Resident 5). This failure had the potential to result in accident hazards and safety concerns for Resident 5. Findings: During an observation on September 5, 2023, at 10:30 AM, Resident 5 was observed to be in the dining room, sitting on a chair, at the table with other residents. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, (contains demographic and medical information), the admission Record indicated, Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease ( brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect your thoughts, mood and behavior), and bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration). During a concurrent interview and record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident ' s right to be free from abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish), for two of three sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2), when: 1. A dietary staff member (Cook 1) yelled at Resident 1 on multiple occasions, when Resident 1 approached [NAME] 1 to request for meals alternatives. 2. A dietary staff member (Cook 1) yelled at Resident 2 on multiple occasions, when Resident 2 approached [NAME] 1 to request for meals alternatives. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 and 2 to experience psychosocial harm. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (brain damage causing stiff muscles in all extremities) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their abuse investigation and reporting policy and procedure was being implemented for two of three residents (Residents 1 and 2), when Residents 1 and 2 reported an allegation of verbal abuse (act of harassing, labeling, insulting, scolding, rebuking or excessive yelling towards an individual) from [NAME] 1, on July 11, 2023, and facility reported incident on July 14, 2023 (3 days after the allegation was made). This failure had the potential for Residents 1 and 2 not be protected from further potential abuse and experience psychosocial harm. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on July 18, 2023, at 12:00 PM, inside of Resident 1 ' s room, Resident 1 was sitting on her wheelchair, in front of the nurses ' station. Resident 1 stated, on July 11, 2023, during the Resident Council Meeting, Resident 1 reported [NAME] 1 was rough when talked to. Resident 1 further stated she was afraid of her, when she needs to go to the kitchen for any request. Resident 1 stated it was an ongoing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The top of the mantle above the stove, the coffee maker, and the beverage machine were dusty. 2. Inside the fridge, there was an opened package of slice ham in a closed plastic container, labeled with an expiration date of July 23, 2022 (three days expired), and one plastic four-quart container, which had unlabeled Styrofoam cups containing pink yogurt. 3. Two (2) sinks in the kitchen did not have an air gap (a separation of the drainpipe on a sink to prevent backflow of contaminated water during negative pressure). 4. The floors under the stove had broken pieces of a plate, food crumbs, and trash. These failures had the potential to expose 74 highly vulnerable residents who received food from the kitchen to food-borne illness (food poisoning). Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview, with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), on July 26, 2022, at 8:55 AM, in the kitchen, the top of the mantle above the stove, the coffee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for one resident (Resident 64) reviewed for urinary catheter (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag) which was not covered by a dignity bag (bag that covers the urine collection bag). This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 64's dignity and violate his right to privacy, which could cause psychosocial harm and lead to low self-esteem, feeling irritated, sad, and anxious. Findings: During a review of Resident 64's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated, Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included urinary tract infection (infection in any part of the urinary system), type 1 diabetes (a condition where the body does not produce enough insulin), depression (always feeling sad), and mild cognitive impairment (some loss of memory). During an observation in Resident 64's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-29 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal belongings were inventoried and documented upon admission, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure, for one resident (Resident 181) reviewed for personal property. This failure had the potential to hinder the facility's ability to investigate any allegations of theft or loss due to a result in a lack of documentation of Resident 181's personal belongings. Findings: During a review of Resident 181's medical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 181 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass), depression (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and obesity. During a concurrent interview and record review, with the Social Services Director (SSD), on July 29, 2022, at 11:55…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prior or upon admission, the staff inquired about any existing advance directive (a legal document that explains how an individual wants medical decisions to be made if the individual is incapable of making their own decisions) for four of five residents (Residents 19, 59, 73, and 75) reviewed for advance directives. This failure had the potential for Residents 19, 59, 73, and 75 to receive an end of life care which was not in accordance with their wishes, and to recieve life sustaining measures to be rendered against what the residents wanted. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 19's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated, Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hypotension (low blood pressure), type 2 diabetes mellitus (chronic condition in which the body does not produce enough insulin) and asthma (condition in which airways…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS- a computerized assessment instrument) for one resident (Resident 41) reviewed for restraints. This failure had the potential to cause inaccuracy in identifying Resident 41's care and support needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and clinical data), indicated, Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) and bipolar disorder (mental health problem). A review of Resident 41's physician's order, dated November 22, 2021, indicated .Order Summary: .May apply lap buddy [a cushioned device that snugs into the frame of the wheelchair, placed across the lap] when up in w/c [wheelchair] for proper body alignment and positioning due to poor body trunk control; and for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe oxygen administration for two of four residents (Residents 59 and 79) reviewed for respiratory care, when Residents 59 and 79's rooms did not have oxygen in use/no smoking signs posted outside their entrance doors as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of fire in the facility, due to the lack of signage indicating a gas (oxygen) was in use in the rooms of Residents 59 and 79. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 59's medical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- disease which makes it difficult to breathe), asthma (narrowing of the airways in the lungs), and malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung (lung cancer). A review of Resident 59's physician's orders, dated June 27, 2022,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe oxygen administration were provided in accordance with the physician's orders and care plans (an individualized plan for the medical care of a resident) for two of four residents (Residents 59 and 53) reviewed for respiratory care when Residents 59 and 53's nasal cannulas (a device which delivers oxygen utilizing a tube) were not replaced after seven days of use. This failure had the potential for unmet care needs for Resident's 59 and 53 due to them not receiving care and services specified in their physician's and care plan. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 59's medical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - disease which makes it difficult to breathe), asthma (narrowing of the airways in the lungs), and malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff members were provided training on advance directives (a legal document that explains how an individual wants medical decisions to be made if the individual is incapable of making their own decisions) in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures. This failure had the potential for 76 residents to not be properly assessed for current existing advance directives, or educated on, and assisted with the process of establishing a new advance directive. Findings: During an interview, with the Social Services Director (SSD), on July 29, 2022, at 9:00 AM, the SSD stated her department was responsible for educating residents and assisting them in establishing an advance directive if they desired. The SSD further stated she had not conducted any staff training regarding advance directives. During an interview, with a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 4), on July 29, 2022, at 9:54 AM, LVN 4 stated she had worked at the facility for 10 months but had not received any training regarding advance directives. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate records of controlled medications (medications that are controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause addiction) for two of three medication carts (Unit A Cart 2 and Unit B Cart 3). These failures had the potential for drug diversion (illegal distribution of controlled drugs for any illicit use) of controlled medications by staff in a highly vulnerable population of 76 residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview, with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 3), on July 27, 2022, at 8:07 AM, the Unit A Medication Cart 2's Narcotic Count Record (NCR- narcotic records, a form used by the facility to verify counting of controlled drugs at the change of shift by oncoming and off going licensed nurses), dated July 1, 2022, to July 27, 2022, was reviewed. The NCR indicated the following: a. On July 17, 2022, missing signature from the night shift (11:00 PM- 7:00 AM) oncoming nurse. b. On July 18, 2022, missing signatures from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentations for three residents (Residents 73, 24, and 26) when: 1. For Resident 73, the code status (the type of emergent treatment a person would or would not receive if their heart or breathing were to stop) was documented as full code (attempt full resuscitation measures) in the physical chart, and indicated Do Not Resuscitate (DNR - do not attempt resuscitative measures) in the electronic health record (EHR). This failure had the potential for a delay in treatment due to conflicting documented code status for Resident 73. 2. For Resident 24, Resident 24 had a physician's order of fortified (nutrients added to food that don't naturally occur in the food to improve nutrition and add health benefits) high protein mechanical soft (texture-modified diet) and was observed on two separate occasions with a tray card (contains what diet the resident must recieve) which indicated regular mechanical soft. This failure had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their infection control program was implemented for one resident (Resident 64) reviewed for urinary catheter (a bag that collects urine, which connects to a tube that drains the bladder) when Resident 64's urinary catheter bag was found completely resting on the floor. This failure had the potential to jeopardize Resident 64's health and safety due to cross contamination of infectious microorganisms via his urinary catheter bag. Findings: During a review of Resident 64's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated, Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which includes urinary tract infection (infection of the kidneys or bladder), type 1 diabetes (a condition where the body does not produce enough insulin), and mild cognitive impairment (some loss of memory). During a concurrent observation and interview, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2), in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four rooms (Rooms 119, 122, 124, and 125) measured at least 80 square feet per resident. This failure had the potential for the residents housed in Rooms 119, 122, 124, and 125 to not have the ability to move about freely if the square footage limited their personal space. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, with the Administrator (Admin) on February 18, 2025, at 8:40 AM, the Admin reviewed the Entrance Conference Checklist and stated the facility had room waivers for Rooms 119, 122, 124, and 125 for less than 80 square feet. During an environmental tour with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) and the Admin, on February 20, 2025, at 3:48 PM, Rooms 119, 122, 124, and 125 were inspected and the residents' rooms and their measurements of livable space were noted as follows: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER] (two beds) measured: 143.64 sq. ft. [square feet] (71.8 sq. ft. per resident) 2. room [ROOM NUMBER] (two beds) measured:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of 47 resident rooms (Rooms 119, 122, 124 and 125) had the required 80 square feet (sq ft- unit of measurement) of space for each resident when: 1. For room [ROOM NUMBER], the room measured 143.92 sq ft = 71.96 sq ft per resident. 2. For room [ROOM NUMBER], the room measured 150.26 sq ft =75.13 sq ft per resident. 3. For room [ROOM NUMBER], the room measured 148.70 sq ft = 74.35 sq ft per resident. 4. For room [ROOM NUMBER], the room measured 150.59 sq ft = 75.29 sq ft per resident. This failure has the potential to limit the freedom of movement for the residents that occupied the rooms, which could place them at risk for injury. Findings: 1. During an inspection of room [ROOM NUMBER], on July 27, 2022, at 11:09 AM, the following were observed: a. Bed 1, occupied by Resident 61, was located near the wall near the entrance of the room. Resident 61 was sitting on his wheelchair near his bed. He stated he does not need assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG FACILITIES OPERATIONS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/11/2003 |
| IRA E SMEDRA LIVING TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 08/11/2003 |
| WIN WIN ENTERPRISES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 48% | since 08/11/2003 |
| LATTERELL, KYLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/13/2025 |
| VIDALES, MIGUEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2021 |
| WINTNER, JACOB | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/11/2003 |
| CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/12/2025 |
| CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| PREFERRED BANK | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/02/2024 |
| BUTENKO, JULIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/24/2023 |
| CAPELA, HEIDI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/03/2023 |
| CHIMWAZA, PEARSON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/12/2025 |
| HASSELL, LANCE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/25/2022 |
| LUTZ, LINDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2012 |
| PAI, SHANTHARAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/09/2013 |
| SALAZAR, PAULINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/14/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $583K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055650. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.