No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Monte Vista Healthcare Center

802 Buena Vista Street, Duarte, CA 91010 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 69 certified beds · (626) 359-8141 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 359-8141 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
931 Buena Vista St Ste 103 · (626) 357-9100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
931 Buena Vista St · (626) 357-8500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1193 Huntington Dr · (626) 256-0108 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(626) 357-7931 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1210 Royal Oaks Dr

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.2%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.4%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.1%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.0%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.3%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.3%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.732.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.241.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
54.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.59U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.27hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 54.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 46% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.2%CMS range 30.4–51.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.2–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge54.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.0%CMS range 6.0–18.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.621.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
1.40
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.20
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
47.6%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 61.7 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.20 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.40 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-24)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's Documentation Survey Report (DSR - certified nursing assistant's [CNA's] documentation of care provided to the resident) regarding turning and repositioning Resident 1 every two hours was not completed on 4/12/2026, 4/13/2026, 4/15/2026, 4/17/2026, 4/18/2026, and on 4/20/2026 to 4/25/2026.This failure resulted in Resident 1's medical record containing incomplete information and had the potential for Resident 1 to receive inappropriate care and treatment resulting in delayed wound healing or worsening of Resident 1's pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence).Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of prostate (prostate cancer), malignant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive person-centered care plans (CP) were developed for two of two sampled residents (Resident 36 and Resident 14) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered and Fall Risk Assessment. This failure had the potential to result in unmet individualized needs for Residents 36 and 14 and the potential to affect the resident's physical and psychosocial well-being.Cross Reference F689Findings: a. During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included intervertebral disc displacement (a spinal condition where the soft, gel-like center of a spinal disc pushes through its tough outer ring into the spinal canal) - lumbar region (lower part of the back), cerebellar ataxia (involuntary muscle coordination causing unsteady movements), repeated falls, and lack of coordination,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled residents (Resident 20, 24, 36) received medication or treatment in accordance with the physician's orders and the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) by: A. Failing to administer two grams of lidocaine (medication used to numb tissues for procedures or pain relief) external ointment 5% as indicated on the medication physician order for Resident 20. B. Failing to provide Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA, specialized rehabilitative care provided by nurse assistants with extra training to help residents regain or maintain mobility, strength, and independence in activities of daily living) services as indicated in Resident 24's physician order.C. Failing to initiate Fall Risk Assessments after Resident 36 sustained falls on 1/30/2026, 2/19/2026, 3/1/2026, 3/23/2026, and on 4/15/2026.This deficient practice had the potential to result in harm and a physical decline to Resident 20, Resident 24, and Resident 36.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one bag of breaded fish, in one of one freezer (Freezer 1), was labeled and dated as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food Receiving and Storage.This deficient practice had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses (type of illness caused by consuming contaminated food or beverages) to the residents residing at the facility and consuming the food.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/21/2026 at 9:07 AM during the kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM), Freezer 1 had one bag of breaded fish with an undated label. The DM stated the bag of breaded fish did not contain a label that indicated a received, date and use by, date which was required for resident food safety.During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Food Receiving and Storage, dated 11/2022, the P&P's policy statement indicated foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. The P&P's refrigerated/frozen storage section indicated all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection (the invasion and growth of germs in the body) prevention and control practices by failing to ensure:a.Personal care items found inside the [NAME] and [NAME] restroom (a shared restroom situated between two bedrooms, featuring direct access from both rooms) for 4 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 54, Resident 9, Resident 39, and Resident 45) were labeled and stored properly.b. The lint screen/trap for one of one sampled commercial laundry dryer (CLD) was free of accumulation of lint c. An Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP - an infection-control practice to prevent the spread of bacteria in nursing homes) sign was posted outside of 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 70).These deficient practices had the potential to result in cross contamination (the process by which microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one area/object to another with a harmful effect) and/or the development and transmission of disease (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 44) was treated with dignity when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 failed to close the door of Resident 44's shared room and/or the door of the shared restroom while Resident 44 was using the toilet on 4/21/2026.This deficient practice could potentially result in Resident 44 feeling bothered, invaded, or humiliated, and the potential to negatively impact Resident 44's psychosocial (the emotional and social requirements that individuals must have to feel safe, supported, and capable of functioning well in their environment) well-being.Findings:During a review of Resident 44's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 44 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a long standing lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) with acute (sudden) exacerbation (worsening of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to create a Baseline Care Plan (BCP, a form where one can summarize a person's health conditions, care needs, and current treatments) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 70) with 48 hours of admission.This deficient practice had the potential to result in unmet needs for Resident 70.Findings: During a review of Resident 70's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including bacteremia (a condition in which bacteria are present in the bloodstream) and chronic (long standing) diastolic congestive heart failure (inability of the heart to efficiently pump blood through the body, causing buildup of blood in the veins and of other body fluids in tissue).During a review of Resident 70's History and Physical (H&P), date of admission 4/17/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 70 did not have capacity to understand and make decisions.During an interview on 4/24/2026 at 3:15 PM with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement safety measures to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 36) who had a history of multiple falls and was at risk for falls. On 4/24/2026 Resident 36's bed was not in the lowest position and Resident 36's bilateral (two sides) floor mats were not on Resident 36's bedside.The deficient practice had the potential to result in falls, injury, and a physical decline to Resident 36.Cross Reference F684 and F656.Findings:During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included intervertebral disc displacement (a spinal condition where the soft, gel-like center of a spinal disc pushes through its tough outer ring into the spinal canal) - lumbar region (lower part of the back), cerebellar ataxia (involuntary muscle coordination causing unsteady movements), repeated falls, and lack of coordination, abnormalities in gait and mobility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 32), who was receiving enteral feeding (tube feeding), was provided appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications to Resident 32's gastrostomy tube (GT, a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings and/or medications to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems). On 4/23/2026, Resident 32 did not have an abdominal binder (a wide, compressive belt made of elastic or fabric that wraps around the stomach) wrapped around Resident 32's GT area, Resident 32's GT site had an undated soiled dressing (a piece of material such as a pad applied to a wound to promote healing and protect it from infection), and the GT site had redness, inflammation, and dried-up drainage around the GT site.This deficient practice had the potential to result in an infection (the invasion and growth of germs in the body) to Resident 32 and displacement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 14) received proper respiratory (relating to breathing) care such as oxygen (02 [a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential for living]) therapy in accordance with the physician's order.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 14's not receiving the correct dose of supplemental 02 and the potential to result in complications such as shortness of breath and respiratory failure. Findings:During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 14 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a medical emergency where the lungs suddenly fail to get enough oxygen into the blood causing severe shortness of breath), and heart failure, unspecified.During a review of Resident 14's undated History and Physical Examination (H&P), the H&P indicated Resident 14's did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information of actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff who were directly responsible for resident care, per shift daily, in a prominent location and make readily accessible to residents and visitors for viewing on 4/21/2026, 4/22/2026, 4/23/2026 and 4/24/2026. This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate nursing hours posted by the facility and had the potential to result in residents and family members obtaining misleading information posted.Findings:During an observation on 4/24/2026 at 12:35 PM, the facility's posted document titled Projected Census and Direct Service Hours Per Patient Day (DPHHD) on 4/21/2026, 4/22/2026, 4/23/2026, and 4/24/2026, the DPHHD indicated the projected hours for direct care staff for shifts 7 AM to 3 PM, 3 PM to 11 PM, and 11 PM to 7 AM. The DPHHD did not indicate the actual hours worked per shift.During an interview and concurrent record review with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), on 4/24/2026 at 12:41 PM, the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident's (Resident 48) had two home medication bottle contents verified by a licensed pharmacist as indicated by the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medications Brought to the Facility by the Resident/Family.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 48 to receive medication and/or tablets other than what was indicated on the medication bottle labels and the potential to affect Resident 48's physical well-being.Findings: During a review of Resident 48's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a condition that occurs late in life and worsens with time in which brain cells degenerate; it is accompanied by memory loss, physical decline, and confusion) and generalized muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 48's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 3/2/2026,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 4) had a consent (when a patient gives permission for something to happen) for the COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease of 2019 - a highly contagious respiratory illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) vaccine (medications used to prevent diseases usually given by injection or by mouth) prior to being administered the vaccine and as indicated by the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents.This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 4 not making informed decisions due to not being aware of the potential risks and benefits associated with the vaccine.Findings:During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a long standing lung disease causing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan (CP, a person-centered plan that outlines a resident's specific health needs, goals, and tailored interventions required to achieve their highest level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being) for two of three sampled residents (Residents 1 and Resident 2), as evidenced by: 1.Resident 1's vaccine (a type of medicine that helps the body to fight a disease before getting it, so illness is prevented or stays mild) refusal was not addressed in the care plan. 2. Resident 2's influenza (a highly contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses that infect the nose, throat, and the lungs) status was not addressed in the care plan. This failure had the potential to result in unmet individualized medical needs for Resident 1 and Resident 2 and had the potential to affect the residents' physical and psychosocial well-being.Findings:a.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Influenza Vaccine for one of three sampled employees (Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVN] 1) when the facility did not obtain LVN 1's influenza vaccine (an annual vaccine designed to protect against infection from influenza [a highly contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses that infects the nose, throat, and the lungs] viruses) administration record to ensure tracking and documentation of employee influenza vaccination. This failure resulted in LVN 1's employee file being incomplete and had the potential for influenza transmission to vulnerable residents (in general), causing harm, and an inability to track vaccination records.Findings:During an interview on 3/4/2026 at 11:02 AM with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated LVN 1 received the influenza vaccine in August of 2025 but had not provided proof of vaccination to the facility. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/4/2026 at 2:45 PM with the Director of Staffing Development (DSD), LVN 1's Personnel Action Form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, dated 4/2021, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) on 1/30/2026 by failing to report Resident 3's allegation of abuse within two hours and failing to remove Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 from resident contact immediately after Resident 3 made an allegation of abuse involving CNA 1.These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 3 to feel unsafe and for Resident 3 to be subjected to abuse.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract).During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - resident assessment tool), dated 2/5/2026, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 2) to the local Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against facility administration), to the Police, and to the State Survey Agency within two (2) hours of obtaining Resident 2's right hip X-ray results, in accordance with facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating. This failure had the potential to place Resident 2 at risk for further injury and/or harm from abuse and/or other sources.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 2) after Resident 2's bilateral hip (involving both hips) X-ray (picture or digital image of the inside of the body) results, dated 12/21/2025 and timed at 9:14 am, indicated Resident 2 had a suspected acute right femur (thigh bone) fracture (a partial or complete break in the bone). Resident 2 was transferred and admitted to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1 on 12/21/2025 at 4:44 pm. Resident 2's GACH 1 right hip X-ray results, dated 12/22/2025 and timed at 9:11 am, indicated Resident 2 had an acute right femur fracture. This failure had the potential to place Resident 2 at risk for further injury and/or harm from abuse and/or other sources. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 did an assessment including vital signs (VS - measurements of the body's basic functions, such as heart rate, breathing rate, blood pressure, and temperature) and documented the assessment and VS on the medical record for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 2) before and after Resident 2 went to an outside doctor's appointment. This failure had the potential for Resident 2's change in condition to be unmonitored which could result in delayed care and services.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness in the arm, leg, and face on one side of the body) following cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored, prepared, and distributed under sanitary conditions for all the residents who received food from the kitchen by failing to:1. Ensure food past the use-by date was not available for use in the kitchen.2. Ensure food stored in the kitchen had an open date.These failures placed all residents who received food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illnesses (refers to illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). During a concurrent observation and interview on 07/23/2025 at 9:15 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor in the facility kitchen walk-in refrigerator, a clear plastic container of diced tomatoes was observed labeled with an open date of 07/16/2025. The Dietary Supervisor stated, That (diced tomatoes) should have been discarded three days after opening (7/19/2025). It looks like it was missed. A clear plastic container of grape jelly with no open date was also observed in the walk-in refrigerator. The Dietary Supervisor stated the container of grape jelly was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two trash containers was closed with a tight-fitting lid and kept covered. This failure had the potential to attract insects and harbor pests in the refuse area that can cause a wide spread of diseases and affect the residents, staff, and visitors. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/23/2025 at 9:17 AM with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) at the kitchen, a large white trash can was observed without a lid. The trash can was partially filled with food waste and positioned near clean food carts and meal preparation surfaces. The trash can was open to the environment and not covered in any way. The DS stated the lid of the trash container should be closed at all times. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Sanitization, undated, the policy indicated, All kitchens, kitchen areas and dining areas shall be kept clean, free from litter and rubbish and protected from rodents, roaches, flies and other insects. The policy also indicated kitchen wastes not disposed of by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, sanitary, and homelike environment for the following by failing to: a) One of one sampled resident's bathroom (Resident 29) did not have a clogged toilet. b) Maintain Seven of Seven resident bathrooms (Bathrooms 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7) affecting 18 residents (Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 11, Resident 15, Resident 20, Resident 24, Resident 27, Resident 30, Resident 31, Resident 32, Resident 33, Resident 36, Resident 39, Resident 49, and Resident 211). c) Maintain Four of Four resident rooms (Rooms A, B, C and D) affecting six residents (Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 8, Resident 20, and Resident 36). These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 15, 20, 24, 27, 30, 31, 32, 33, 36, 39, 49, and 211 to be exposed to dirt, mold, rust and drywall dust, which can lead to a decline in the residents' health and result in irritation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, one of one sampled resident (Resident 25), received proper care by failing to follow Resident 25's physician's order that included parameters (specific instructions that can be measured) indicating when to hold (not give) the administration of Losartan Potassium (medication used to treat high blood pressure [hypertension]) for) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Administering Medications. This deficient practice could potentially result in Resident 25's blood pressure to drop too low (hypotension) and result in a medical emergency due to not enough oxygen (02 - colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential for life) and nutrients to Resident 25's vital organs. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (when the lungs can't release enough oxygen into your blood)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 41 and Resident 22), were provided treatment consistent with professional standards of practice to promote the healing of Resident 41's existing pressure ulcer/injury (PI - localized, pressure related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) and to prevent the development of PI to Resident 22 by failing to ensure: a. Resident 41's low air loss mattress (LAL - a mattress attached to a blower pump designed to circulate a constant flow of air to remove excess moisture and regulate the pressure levels, thereby improving blood flow to the wound site) was set correctly on 2/19/2025. b. Resident 22 was turned and repositioned in accordance with Resident 22's care plan (CP). These deficient practices could potentially result in delayed healing of Resident 41's existing PI and the potential for development of a new PI to Resident 22. Findings: a. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, three of three sampled residents (Resident 21, 52, and 111), were provided appropriate respiratory care and services in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) by failing to ensure: a. One of three sampled resident's (Resident 21) nebulizer (a medical device that turns liquid medications into a mist, which is then inhaled through a mouthpiece or a mask) was changed timely. b. Two of three sampled resident's (Resident 52 and 111) oxygen (02 - colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential for life) tubing and breathing treatment's humidifier (a device that adds moisture to the air to prevent dryness) were labeled with a date to ensure the equipment was changed timely. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure there was a physician's order for the administration of oxygen for one of two sampled residents (Resident 52). These deficient practices could potentially result in the growth of harmful bacteria (living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater for one of three sampled residents (Resident 28). There were 3 errors observed during medication administration with 31 opportunities for errors which yielded a 9.68 % error rate. On 2/20/2025, the facility failed to administer the full dose of 3 out of 13 medications for Resident 28 via Resident 28's gastrostomy tube (G-Tube - tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for the administration of food, fluids, and medications). This deficient practice could potentially result in Resident 28 not getting the full efficacy (the ability to produce a desired or intended result) and benefits of the medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 28's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including encounter for attention to gastrostomy and type 2 diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two medications (Senna and Docusate Sodium [medications used to treat constipation and were labeled properly in one of two sampled medication carts (Med Cart 2) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Administering Medications. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to be administered ineffective and contaminated medications and the potential to compromise the health, safety, and well-being of the residents. Findings: During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:26 AM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, during the medication administration, an opened bottle of Senna and an opened bottle of Docusate Sodium did not have an opened date label and were stored inside Med Cart 2. LVN 1 stated, the bottles of Senna and Docusate Sodium were the facility's house supply (medications stocked at the facility). LVN 1 stated, the house supply medications should be dated once opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fortified diets were provided for two of two sampled residents (Resident 29 and Resident 112). This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 29 and 112 not to get the caloric intake ordered by the physician. Findings: During a review of Resident 29's admission Record, (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 29 on 1/19/2022 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke - occurs when blood flow to a part of the brain stops, the brain cannot get nutrients and oxygen. Brain cells can die, causing lasting damage), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis to one side of the body). During a review of Resident 29's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 10/9/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 29 had intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident 29 required supervision or touching assistance (helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were no expired items, in one of one kitchen's (Kitchen 1) storage. This deficient practice had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with infectious organisms) among the residents consuming food at the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/2025 at 8:22 AM, with the Dietary Aide (DA), the following items were expired and still kept in Kitchen 1's dry storage. 1. 1 open package of corn meal, a quarter full had an expiration date of 9/2024. 2. 1 open package of baking powder, half full had an expiration date of 7/2023. The DA stated the expired items needed to be discarded right away. During an interview on 2/18/2025 at 2:30 PM, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated expired food items needed to be discarded right away so kitchen staff did not use it. The DS stated every kitchen staff member was responsible for checking if any food items were expired. The DS did not answer when asked for the reason why there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for 20 of 20 sampled residents (Residents 112, 13, 17, 42, 25, 9, 10, 21, 40, 162, 6, 35, 161, 50, 56, 53, 111, 29, 30, and 114) by failing to ensure, a.&b. two of eight sampled residents (Residents 29 and 30) who exhibited signs and symptoms of norovirus (a highly contagious virus that can cause vomiting, diarrhea and dehydration) were asymptomatic (did not have signs and symptoms [S/S]) prior to discontinuing contact (microorganisms spread through the direct and indirect contact) isolation (staying away/kept away from others) precautions. c. Ensure staff were wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE - protective items or garments worn to protect the body or clothing from hazards that can cause injury and to protect residents from cross-transmission) during contact with residents and/or the resident's environment who were on transmission-based precautions (infection control precautions in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) A call light was functional for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 7). 2) 7 out of 7 bathrooms were in good repair. 3) 1 of 1 sampled resident's (Resident 13) bed control was functional. These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 7, 13, and residents in Rooms A-D to be placed at risk for injury, a decline in the resident's health, and a delay in meeting the resident's needs for toileting and assistance. Cross Reference F584 and F919. Findings: 1) During an interview on 2/18/25 at 12:50 p.m. with Resident 7, Resident 7 stated Resident 7's call light was not working since last night (2/17/25). Resident 7 stated he was told by the night shift Certified Nursing Assistant (no name given) to Yell for me. Resident 7 stated he was upset that he would have to yell for help. Resident 7 stated he requested staff to fix his call light on 2/18/25. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/25 at 12:55 p.m. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and privacy during patient care for one of one sampled resident (Resident 22). This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 22's psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 22 on 7/30/2019, with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of the left lung (lung cancer) and retention of urine (is a condition in which your bladder doesn't empty completely even if it's full). During a review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 10/31/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 22 had severe cognitive impairment and sometimes understands verbal content and sometimes able to express ideas and wants. The MDS indicated Resident 22 was dependent in toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self and required maximum assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with personal hygiene. During an observation on 2/21/2025 at 9 AM while in Resident 22's room,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a proper assessment was conducted for the self-administration (take or do something for yourself that would normally be done by someone else) of Pepto Bismol Ultra (medication used to treat occasional upset stomach, heartburn, and nausea), for one of one sampled resident (Resident 53). On 2/18/2025, there was an almost empty bottle of Pepto Bismol Ultra in Resident 53's room. The facility failed to obtain a consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) from Resident 53 and a physician's order for the self-administration of the medication as indicated in the facility's policy and procedures (P&P), titled, Administering Medications and Self-Administration of Medications. This deficient practice had the potential to harm Resident 53 as a result of overmedicating, improper medication dosage, and a adverse drug event (injuries…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 32) after receiving positive lab results for clostridium difficile (C. diff- a highly contagious bacteria that causes severe diarrhea). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the provision of care and services for Resident 32. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease (plaque buildup in artery walls), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into the tube connecting the mouth and stomach), and dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed). During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure toileting was offered to one of one sampled resident (Resident 14) every two hours as indicated in Resident 14's care plan (CP), titled, At Risk for Falls. This deficient practice had the potential to result in falls and injury to Resident 14. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 14 on 9/15/2023, with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), repeated falls. During a review of Resident 14's CP, titled At Risk for Falls, initiated on 7/14/2024, the CP included an intervention to meet Resident 14's toileting needs every two hours. During a review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 12/2/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 14 had a memory problem and had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 14 required moderate assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed nurse followed the physician's order for indwelling catheter care for one of one resident (Resident 22). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 22 experiencing complications with the use of an indwelling catheter and to affect Resident 22's physical wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 22 on 7/30/2019, with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of the left lung (lung cancer) and retention of urine (is a condition in which your bladder doesn't empty completely even if it's full). During a review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 10/31/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 22 had severe cognitive impairment and sometimes understands verbal content and sometimes able to express ideas and wants. The MDS indicated Resident 22 was depended in toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self and required maximum assistance (helper does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 28), received appropriate care and services during gastrostomy tube (G-Tube - tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) medication administration. On 2/20/2025, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 used apple sauce to mix Resident 28's medications during administration via Resident 28's G-Tube. This deficient practice had the potential to cause tube-associated complications such as feeding tube occlusions (risk of clogging) to Resident 28's G-Tube. Findings: During a review of Resident 28's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including encounter for attention to gastrostomy and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2- adult-onset disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) with diabetic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food served to the residents was served at a temperature that was safe and appetizing. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food that was not appetizing or palatable to the residents consuming the food and result in resident caloric goals not met. Findings: During an observation on 2/20/2025 at 1:15 PM, the licensed nurses and the certified nursing assistants (CNA's) were distributing food trays to the residents, the last cart sent out from the kitchen was sampled. During a review of th e facility's Cycle 1 2025 Winter Menu, last approved 5/11/2025, the menu indicated on Thursday, 2/20/2025, the following food items would be served for lunch: baked chicken, mashed potatoes/gravy, green beans, bread/margarine, snickerdoodle, cake/icing, and water. During a review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes, dated 12/2024 and 1/2025, the Resident Council Minutes indicated in December 2024, a resident complained food was always cold by the time food was received. The January 2025, minutes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning call light for one of one sampled resident (Resident 7). This deficient practice had the potential for delay in care and services to meet Resident 7's needs for hydration, toileting, and activities of daily living. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), epilepsy (a chronic brain disorder in which groups of nerve cells, or neurons, in the brain sometimes send the wrong signals and cause seizures), and muscle weakness (lack of muscle strength). During an interview on 2/18/25 at 12:50 p.m. with Resident 7, Resident 7 stated his call light was not working since last night (2/17/25). Resident 7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one kitchen (Kitchen 1) area was kept free of pest. On 2/18/2025, two dead cockroaches were found in Kitchen 1. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with infectious organisms) due to harboring of pest. Findings: During a tour of the Kitchen 1 on 2/18/2025 at 8:45 AM, there were two dead cockroaches at the back of the walk-in freezer, the roaches were visible when checking the 3- inch gap located between the walk-in freezer and the wall. The Dietary Aide (DA) used a broom to sweep the cockroaches from the back wall. The broom used had dust and green beans that were swept together with the dead roaches. During an interview on 2/18/2025 at 8:47 AM, with the DA, the DA stated it was dead cockroaches. During an interview on 2/18/2025 at 2:40 PM, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated the cockroaches could have come out of hiding after the monthly pest control visit more than a week ago. The DS stated kitchen staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered care-plans for 3 of 3 (Resident 46, Resident 35 and Resident 38) sampled residents when: a. There was no care plan created for Resident 46 who was diagnosed with abdominal distension (swollen belly, enlarged). b-c. For Resident 35 and Resident 38, the facility did not follow an existing care plan's intervention to trim, and clean Resident 35's and Resident 38's nails on bath day and as necessary. These failures had the potential to result in inconsistent implementation of care and had the potential to result in physical declines to Residents 46, 35, and 38 and result in infections to Residents 35 and 38. Cross Reference: F677 Findings: a.During a review of Resident 46's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 46 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (last stage of kidney loss) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary grooming services were provided for three of six sampled Residents (Residents 3, 35, and 38) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Fingernails/Toenails, Care of, by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 3, who had a left contracted (condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissues, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) hand, had trimmed and clean fingernails. 2. Ensure Resident 35's fingernails and toenails (hard, smooth covering that protects the upper part of the end of a toe) were kept trimmed and clean. 3. Ensure Resident 38's fingernails were kept trimmed and clean. The failures resulted in Resident 3's fingernails pressing into Resident 3's left palm (part of hand between the bases of the fingers and the wrist), causing pain and discomfort to Resident 3. The failures had the potential to result in the development of infections and injuries to Resident's 3,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-11 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistive hearing devices were available for one of one sampled resident (Resident 15) who was hard of hearing (HOH). Resident 15 was not provided with audiology (health care professionals who identify, assess, and manage disorders of hearing, balance, and other neural systems) services to address Resident 15's hearing impairment. This failure had the potential to result in further hearing loss and a psychosocial decline to Resident 35 and the potential to affect Resident 15's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hearing loss of unspecified ear, subsequent (occurring) falls, and dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life). During a review of Resident 15's Admission/readmission Data Tool (ARDT), dated 9/15/23, the tool indicated Resident 15's ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not 5 percent (%) or greater during medication administration observation. The facility had 25 medication administration opportunities observed and two of the 25 medications administered resulted in a medication error rate of 8%. The errors consisted of: a. For Resident 33, who had a gastrostomy tube (GT- tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) and who could not receive solid textures by mouth, the facility failed to ensure the physician's order indicated administration of Bactrim by GT, the order indicated an incorrect route to administer by mouth to Resident 33. b. For Resident 4, the facility failed to administer Peridex (a medication that treats gum disease) as indicated by pharmacy recommendations to Resident 4. These failures had the potential to result in adverse drug events (injuries resulting from medication use including physical and mental harm, or loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool) was accurate for one of one sampled resident (Residents 54). Resident 54's MDS incorrectly indicated Resident 54 was dehydrated (a dangerous loss of body fluid caused by illness, sweating, or inadequate intake). This failure had the potential to result with inadequate treatments and/or services to Resident 54. Findings: During a review of Resident 54's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 54 was admitted to facility on 1/12/24 with multiple diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (when the lungs can't get enough oxygen into the blood, sudden) with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues), epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures), and cerebral palsy (a group of disorders that affect a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture). During a review of Resident 54's MDS, dated 1/18/24, the MDS indicated Resident 54 was severely (never/rarely made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-11 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post actual worked nursing hours at the start of each shift in one of one Nursing Stations (Nursing Station 1) as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised August 2022. This failure had the potential to result inaccurately reflecting the actual nurses providing direct care to the residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/10/24 at 4:44 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the facility's Daily Direct Care Staffing, dated 2/10/24 was reviewed. The DSD stated a Daily Direct Care Staffing was posted at Nurses Station 1. The DSD stated a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) from the night shift, or the Director of Nursing (DON) posted the document in Nurses Station 1. The DSD stated the Daily Direct Care Staffing only indicated the projected staffing level and did not reflect accurate staffing levels if a staff person called off. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were included in the facility's, Water Management Program (WMP, a program develop to identify hazardous conditions and taking steps to minimize the growth and transmission of Legionella [bacteria that causes severe lung inflammation called Legionnaires' disease, LD]) and other waterborne pathogens [living thing that causes disease]) by failing to: Develop specific control measures per facility risk area used to control the introduction and/or spread of Legionella. These failures could potentially result in the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens and had the potential to result in the development and transmission of LD which could compromise the health and safety of all residents residing at the facility. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/11/24 at 12:51 pm, with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the facility's, Water Management Program (WMP), was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Briarcrest Nursing CenterBell Gardens, CA 1 of 5Glendale Post Acute CenterGlendale, CA 1 of 5Huntington Drive Health And Rehabilitation CenterArcadia, CA 1 of 5Laguna Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterLaguna Hills, CA 1 of 5Madera Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterMadera, CA 1 of 5Monrovia Gardens Healthcare CenterMonrovia, CA 1 of 5Rinaldi Convalescent HospitalGranada Hills, CA 1 of 5Valley Palms Care CenterN Hollywood, CA 2 of 5Casitas Care CenterGranada Hills, CA 2 of 5Harbor Villa Care CenterAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Lassen Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSusanville, CA 2 of 5Lynwood Post Acute Care CenterLynwood, CA 2 of 5Mountain View Conv HospSylmar, CA 2 of 5Murrieta Health And Rehabilitation CenterMurrieta, CA 2 of 5Seal Beach Health And Rehabilitation CenterSeal Beach, CA 3 of 5Anaheim Crest Nursing CenterAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Broadway Healthcare CenterSan Gabriel, CA 3 of 5Buena Vista Care CenterAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Highland Care Center of RedlandsRedlands, CA 3 of 5La Sierra Care CenterMerced, CA 3 of 5Professional Post Acute CenterSan Rafael, CA 3 of 5Watsonville Nursing CenterWatsonville, CA 3 of 5West Covina Healthcare CenterWest Covina, CA 4 of 5Country Manor La Mesa Healthcare CenterLa Mesa, CA 4 of 5Glendale Healthcare CenterGlendale, CA 4 of 5Merced Nursing & Rehabilitation CtrMerced, CA 4 of 5Rancho Mirage Health And Rehabilitation CenterRancho Mirage, CA 5 of 5Modesto Post Acute CenterModesto, CA 5 of 5Ontario Healthcare CenterOntario, CA 5 of 5Watsonville Post Acute CenterWatsonville, CANot rated (Special Focus)Sunray Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WIN WIN ENTERPRISES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF45%since 02/19/2003
LAWLER, EMELYNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/10/2024
VIDALES, MIGUELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
WINTNER, JACOBIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/19/2003
CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2014
BUTENKO, JULIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/24/2023
CAPELA, HEIDIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2023
GAZARIAN, LEVONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/09/2013
HASSELL, LANCEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2022
LUTZ, LINDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2012
SALAZAR, PAULINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/14/2020
SMEDRA, IRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2003
VENTANILLA, DIANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/26/2024
802 BUENA VISTA STREET, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2003
BH ALLIANCEOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2003

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$990K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 17%Other / private 16%

This home reported $990K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$404per resident / day
operating cost
$12,296per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$409per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055817. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next