No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lassen Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

2005 River Street, Susanville, CA 96130 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (530) 257-5341 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
555 Ash St · (530) 257-9060 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.2 mi
1615 Main St · (530) 257-0603 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1616 Main St · (530) 251-2581 · Call to confirm hours
Park
River St · (530) 260-4966 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.3%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.7%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%1.2%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.0%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.0%0.4%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%1.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.0%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.2%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.3%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.5%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.5%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.7%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.322.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.671.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 171 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.9%CMS range 32.5–47.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.2–11.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge42.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge75.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.7–9.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.65
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
60.0%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 83.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.96 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-25)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-24)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner when:1.Meat was not thawed appropriately.2.Water from thawing meat splashed onto ready to eat vegetables causing possible cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria, viruses, or allergens from one surface, food, or object to another between raw meat thawing and cooked vegetables).3.Staff did not wash hands after handing dirty items on the dirty side of the dish machine and before touching clean items such as eating utensils, water pitchers, and food storage tubs.Staff did not wash hands upon entering the kitchen and before starting kitchen tasks.4.Cooking pans were in poor condition.5.The can opener blade and holder was not clean.6.Cutting boards were in poor condition.7.The standing mixer was not clean.8.The knife holder was not clean.9.Thickener (a powder used to thicken liquids) was not covered, labeled, or dated.10.Dry food located in the food storage room was not stored appropriately.11.A scoop was stored directly on top of a bin of dried rice.12.Sugar was contaminated.13.Water cups were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and facility policy and procedure (P&P) review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered timely for 8 of 19 sampled residents (Residents 73, 98, 3, 85, 74, 57, 6, 93) and four of seven confidentially interviewed residents.This failure resulted in dependent residents (residents not able to help themselves to the bathroom, out of bed, or out of their wheelchairs) not receiving the assistance they needed. Findings: Review of a facility procedure titled, Answering the Call Light revised October 2023 indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs.1. Answer the resident call system immediately. Review of Resident 73's medical record indicated that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. During an interview on 6/22/26 at 11:00 AM, Resident 73 indicated staff were slow to answer call lights at night. Review of Resident 98's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-25 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure Food and Nutrition Services (FNS) staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the FNS department when:1.Two staff did not know manual dishwashing procedures;2.One staff did not follow the recipe for pureed food;3.One staff used expired test strips for testing sanitizer strength; and4.Two staff did not follow proper hand hygiene procedures (Cross Reference F812).The failure to ensure FNS staff competency and skills sets resulted in 4 of 10 FNS staff not appropriately carrying out tasks related to their jog duties which had the potential to lead to contamination of food and food service equipment, and decreased quality of food for a census of 90.Findings: 1.Review of the policy and procedure titled, Food and Nutrition Services Staff dated 2001, showed the food and nutrition services staff, under the supervision of the Dietitian and/or the food and nutrition services manager, will safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide alternate entrees of equal nutritive value to the entree served. This failure had the potential to result in decreased nutrient intake leading to food related medical issues for 11 out of 11 residents who requested an egg salad sandwich alternate entree for a lunch meal out of a census of 90. Findings: Review of the policy and procedure titled, Menus dated 2001, showed menus meet the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with the recommended dietary allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board. Menus provide a variety of foods from the basic daily food groups and indicate standard portions at each meal. If a food group is missing from a resident's daily diet, the resident is provided an alternate means of meeting his or her nutritional needs. Review of the menu spreadsheet titled, [Facility Name] Spring 2026 Therapeutic Spreadsheets dated week 3 Tuesday, showed Pork Roast with gravy as the main entree. Other items on the menu included mashed potatoes, Italian blend vegetables, and a roll with margarine.An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide basic safety measures for three of 19 residents (Resident 1, 64, and 93) when call lights were not easily accessible as they were not placed within the resident's reach.This failure placed residents at risk for avoidable complications, including incontinent issues and falls, associated with the inability to urgently communicate with staff for needs and safety issues, which could result in physical and emotional decline and reduced quality of life. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Answering the Call Light, dated October 2023, the policy indicated, The purpose is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs.Ensure the call light is accessible to the resident when in bed, from the toilet, from the shower or bathing facility and from the floor. During a review of a facility document titled, New Employee Orientation Checklist, First 8 Hours, undated, indicated, Employees are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of quality were met when one of the Registered Dietitians (RD) was not onsite to complete timely and comprehensive nutrition assessments. This failure had the potential to result in delayed nutrition care for residents leading to an increased risk for nutritionally related clinical decline.Findings:Nutrition-focused physical findings are a fundamental part of a comprehensive nutrition assessment. Registered dietitian nutritionists are uniquely trained to evaluate physical examination data to correctly evaluate nutrient-specific physical findings and analyze the role of nutritional status in health maintenance as well as recovery from injury or disease. The physical assessment is used to evaluate for malnutrition and other nutritional related factors. Physical examination techniques include gathering data via observation and touch. (Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Nutrition Care Manual. Nutrition Focused Physical Findings. https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org. Accessed July 5,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (26, 30) received assistance with their meal in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to result in decreased quality food and/or decreased intake of food leading to weight loss for 2 of 13 residents who received their lunch during the assisted dining.Findings:A review of Resident 26's admission Report, dated 6/24/26, indicated Resident 26 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), seizures (a sudden, temporary burst of uncontrolled electrical activity in the brain), and dementia (a decline in mental ability affecting daily life).A review of Resident 26's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) (yearly comprehensive assessment), dated 9/8/25, indicated under the Swallowing and Nutrition Status Assessment that resident had significant weight loss.Review of Resident 26's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated partial/moderate assistance was required with eating.A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement appropriate interventions to restore bladder continence following indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to remove urine), removal for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 74).This failure placed Resident 74 at risk for missed opportunities to restore or improve bladder continence, avoidable complications associated with prolonged incontinence (loss of bladder control), and reduced quality of life.Findings: A review of Resident 74's admission record indicated that Resident 74 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), retention of urine (unable to fully empty the bladder), heart failure, anxiety disorder, and muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 74's Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool) section C, dated 4/20/26, indicated Resident 74 had mild cognitive (memory and decision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure:1.One of one Dietary Managers received frequently scheduled consultations from a qualified dietitian; and2.One of one Dietary Managers was qualified for his position when DM did not meet a State requirement for a Dietary Manager.Failure to ensure one of one Dietary Managers received frequent consultation from the dietitian and training qualifications were met for the Dietary Manager, had the potential to result in substandard Food and Nutrition Services operations serving a census of 90. Findings:According to the California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC S 1265.4 current as of January 01, 2025, a licensed health facility shall employ a full-time, part-time, or consulting dietitian. A health facility that employs a registered dietitian less than full time, shall also employ a full-time dietetic services supervisor who meets the requirements to supervise dietetic service operations. The dietetic services supervisor shall receive frequently scheduled consultation from a qualified dietitian. One of five…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four Residents (27 and 35) received their prescribed nutritional supplements.This failure placed Residents 27 and 35 at increased risk for malnutrition and weight loss.Findings: A review of Magic Cup definition per the manufacturer of Magic Cup; it can be eaten frozen like an ice cream or thawed like a pudding. Magic cups are a supplement option for adding nutrition, calories, and protein for those experiencing involuntary weight loss. Magic cups contain 290 calories and 9 grams of protein for a 4 ounce serving. (Magic Kitchen, Magic Cup, magickitchen.com, accessed 3/7/26)A review of the facility's, Therapeutic Diet policy, dated 10/2017, indicated, Therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care and in accordance with his or her goals and preferences.A review of the facility's, Food and Nutrition Services policy, dated 10/2017, indicated, Each resident is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 51 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain equipment located in the kitchen when there was not a system to track maintenance requests, and:1.One of seven food storage coolers was leaking;2.There was a leak from plumbing in relation to the ice machine;The failure to have a system for tracking maintenance requests and maintain leaks from two of over 13 pieces of equipment had the potential to result in delayed maintenance of equipment; attract and provide harborage for pests leading to contamination of food and equipment; and pose an electrical safety risk for a census of 90. Findings:During an interview on 6/23/26 at 9:01 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) stated he was responsible for reporting maintenance issues for the kitchen. DM stated maintenance issues were mostly reported to maintenance verbally because maintenance was very quick to fix things, and there was not even time to put in a work order before something was fixed. It was noted there was not a way to track most maintenance requests from DM due to requests were mostly verbal. 1.An observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent verbal and physical abuse for three of five sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 5) when:Resident 2 hit Resident 1 in the arm twiceResident 3 pulled Resident 2's hair and spit on Resident 4Nursing Assistant (NA 2) sprayed Resident 5 in the face with the shower nozzle, tossed her in bed and verbally threatened her. These failures had the potential to result in psychological, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes causing fear, anxiety, and adverse outcomes.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse Prevention Program indicated, the residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. The facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone, including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, family members.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Resident Rights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), the Ombudsman (State advocacy program for residents), and to local Law Enforcement a verbal and physical abuse allegation for two of three sampled residents when Resident 3 told the facility Administrator (FA) that Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A was harsh, brutal and mean to her roommates (Residents 1 and 2). This failure to report an abuse allegation prevented local and state agencies from providing prompt oversight to ensure the residents in the facility were safe and protected from abuse.Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse Investigating and Reporting revised July 2017, indicated that, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source ( abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Reporting: 1. All alleged violations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that significant medication error was avoided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when, an order written by the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) to restart Resident 1's Eliquis (a blood thinner) was not carried out and went unrecognized by the FNP and Licensed Nurses (LN), for 42 days.This failure contributed to Resident 1 developing a Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT, blood clot) in his right leg which required a surgical procedure and hospitalization to remove the blood clot and had the potential to cause serious pain, emotional distress, prolonged health declines, and life-threatening conditions.Findings:During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Attending Physician Responsibilities, dated Revised August 2014,indicated, Each Attending Physician will be responsible for.initial and subsequent resident care.The physician's documentation should indicate review and acknowledgement of a resident's program of care. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three residents sampled (Resident 1) received care consistent with professional standards when the physician's order to change her urostomy bag (a waterproof pouch worn on the outside of the abdomen to collect urine) was not followed.This failure had the potential to cause infection.Findings:Review of a facility policy titled Administering Medications revised December 2012, indicated .must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frames.Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included history of urinary tract infections (infection of any part of the urinary tract such as the kidneys, ureters, and/or bladder), and artificial opening of urinary tract (urostomy - a surgical opening in the abdomen to create a way for urine to exit the body when the bladder is damaged or removed).During an interview on 2/4/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not notify the Pharmacy Consultant (PC) to complete medication reviews for three out of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3) who experienced weight loss. This resulted in unmet pharmacy service needs and had the potential to contribute to further weight loss.Findings: A review of the facility's policies and procedures (P&P), titled, Weight Assessment and Interventions, revised 3/1/22, indicated, the facility would evaluate medication for possible side-effects that could cause weight loss. A review of the facility's (P&P) titled, Nutritional Assessment, revised 10/1/23, indicated, the PC would review the resident's current medication list and ensure the medication did not interfere with nutrition absorption or appetite. A review of the facility's P&P titled, Consultant Pharmacist Reports, dated 6/1/21, indicated, the consultant pharmacist performed a comprehensive medication regimen review (MRR) at least monthly. The P&P indicated the MRR included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and reviews, the facility failed to consistently provide three out of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) with Physician ordered therapeutic (customized meal plan to manage a medical condition) diets when: 1. Residents 1 and 2 were not consistently provided with a meal that was fortified (added calories); and 2. Resident 3 was not consistently served a fortified meal that included double portions of protein (examples of protein are meats, eggs, and dairy). These failures had the potential to contribute to weight loss.Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Therapeutic Diets, revised 10/1/17, indicated, Therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician to support the resident's treatment and plan of care and in accordance with his or her goals and preferences. A review of the admission Record, dated 3/29/22, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of major depression (a sad mood),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-12 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility and the Registered Dietician (RD) did not maintain an adequate food and nutrition department for three out of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3) with weight loss when: 1. A timely nutrition assessment was not performed for Residents 1, 2, and 3 after a weight loss triggered a change of condition. 2. The RD did not attend weight variance interdisciplinary team (IDT, a group of department heads and staff that provided resident care, to discuss resident care goals and identified concerns) meetings and did not document a progress note that indicated the IDT meeting notes had been reviewed. 3. RD did not communicate to the facility the recommendations made for residents with weight loss or collaborate with the dietary department. 4. The facility and RD were not familiar with the Agreement to Provide Dietetic Consultation Services contract that outlined the facility and RD responsibilities. This had the potential to contribute to further weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with dignity and respect when Resident 1 wanted to return to her room during lunch and the Licensed Nurse (LN) assessed (examined) Resident 1 at the lunch table in front of three other residents. This violated Resident 1's right to maintain the privacy of her medical conditions by allowing other residents to watch and listen as the LN examined her.Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Rights, revised 2/1/23, indicated, facility staff would treat residents with respect and dignity. The P&P indicated, residents had the right to a dignified existence (treated with self-respect), would be provided privacy and confidentiality, and the facility would support residents in exercising (using or acting on) their rights. A review of the admission Record, dated 3/29/22, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to perform a Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), assessment for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a significant change of condition was identified. This had the potential for a delay in the review and revision of the care plan (documented resident goals that included instructions for care). Findings: A review of the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Comprehensive Assessments, revised 10/1/23, indicated, a significant change in status assessment would be performed when the IDT (interdisciplinary team, healthcare professionals who care for the resident work together to coordinate care) determined the resident met the significant change in condition requirements. The P&P defined a significant change in condition as a decline that would not resolve on its own, required staff intervention, impacted more than one area of the resident's health status, and required IDT review and/or revision of the care plan. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility did not monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention (instruction for obtaining goals) for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the staff did not document the amount of Boost (a nutritional drink/supplement) that was consumed. This failure prevented the facility from monitoring and evaluating the intervention's effectiveness, potentially leading to weight loss.Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 3/1/23, indicated, assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about residents and the residents' conditions change. The P&P indicated, care plans would be reviewed and revised when desired outcomes were not met. A review of the facility's P&P titled, Weight Assessment and Interventions, revised 3/1/22, indicated, care plans would include parameters for monitoring and reassessment. A review of the admission Record,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to honor food preferences for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when food portions were too large, and Resident 1 stated she was tired of chocolate. This had the potential to contribute to weight loss.Findings: A review of the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Resident Food Preferences, revised 7/1/23, indicated, resident food preferences would be assessed upon or after admission, food preferences would be based on resident history and life patterns, and communicated to the dietary department. The P&P indicated, If the resident refuses or is unhappy with his or her diet, the staff would confer [talk to] the physician in order to offer a diet the resident is deemed safe to consume in order to satisfy the resident. A review of the admission Record, dated 3/29/22, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of major depression (a sad mood) and fatigue (extreme feeling of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete for three out of five residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) when: 1. Resident 1's code status (the residents' wishes regarding life-sustaining treatment, specifically if the resident stopped breathing or the heart stopped beating) was inaccurately documented throughout Resident 1's medical records. 2. The Resident's Clothing and Possessions form, (inventory sheet, described personal belongings brought into the facility) was not signed by Residents 2, 3, or the resident's responsible party (RP, decision maker). 3. Resident 3's wedding ring and wristwatch were not added to the inventory sheet. These failures had the potential to cause a delay in life sustaining care and personal belongings to not be identified if lost or stolen. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Advance Directives (written instruction on care to be provided when someone was not able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect one out of three resident's (Resident 2) from misappropriation (taken without permission) of resident property when Resident 2's wedding ring was stolen. This violated Resident 2's rights and had the potential to cause psychosocial harm.Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised 4/1/21, indicated, residents had the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property. A review of the admission Record, dated, 5/1/24, indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of unspecified dementia (memory loss) with behavioral disturbance and major depression (a sad mood). Resident 2 was not his own responsible party (RP, decision maker). A review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 4/24/25, indicated, Resident 2 had scored 6 out of 15 during a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report a reasonable suspicion of a crime to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH, responsible for protecting the public's health) for two out of three sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3) when the facility suspected Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) D had stolen two wedding rings. This failure had the potential for further abuse and could negatively affect residents' mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, revised 9/1/22, indicated, all allegations of suspected or actual abuse, including misappropriation (taken without permission) of resident property, would be reported to the local police department, the Ombudsman's (outside person who advocated for resident rights) office, and CDPH within two hours. A review of the admission Record, dated, 5/1/24, indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective training program when facility staff did not attend mandatory in-services (training classes), and the facility failed to provide additional opportunities to make-up the missed in-services. This had the potential for residents not to attain or maintain their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings: A review of the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Attendance at Training Classes, revised [DATE], indicated, All personnel are required to attend their scheduled training classes. The P&P indicated, facility staff would attend make-up classes for any training class (in-service) that was missed. During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE], at 10:10 am, with Director of Staff Development (DSD), attendance sheets for facility provided in-services were reviewed. DSD confirmed, the attendance record titled, Theft and Loss-Residents Personal Property, dated [DATE], indicated, three facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide palatable (tasted good) meals to five out of five sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7) when they stated, the food was bad, had a weird flavored spice that could be tasted on all the food, and the food was cold. This caused residents to have feelings of anger and had the potential to cause unintended weight loss. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy and procedure titled, Food and Nutrition Services, revised 10/1/24, indicated, Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet . and it was the responsibility of the food and nutrition department to ensure meals were .palatable and attractive, and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, dated 10/29/23, indicated, admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease that caused difficulty with breathing), major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow safe infection control practices for three out of four sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) when: 1. Facility staff did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE, gloves, gowns, or masks that were worn to reduce the spread of infection) while performing resident care with Resident 1 and did not perform hand hygiene (washing hands with soap and water or use alcohol-based hand sanitizer) after providing care for Resident 1 or before touching Resident 2; and 2. Enhanced barrier precaution (EBP, use of PPE to reduce the spread of infection for residents who have wounds or foley catheters, a tube inserted into the bladder and was attached to a bag) signage and PPE was not present outside of Resident 3's room and facility staff touched Resident 3's foley catheter tube without use of PPE. These failures had the potential for the spread of infection. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Enhanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner when five out of five sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7) stated experiencing long call light wait times. This failure caused residents to have feelings of anger, worthlessness, and had the potential to negatively impact resident health status. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy and procedure titled, Answering the Call Light, revised 9/1/23, indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident ' s requests and needs and that call lights would be answered as soon as practicable (able to be done). A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, dated 10/29/23, indicated, admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease that caused difficulty with breathing), major depressive disorder (a sad mood), and was dependent upon supplemental oxygen (additional oxygen that was needed for people…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 4) when: 1. The facility did not implement the Urologist's (a physician that specialized in the urinary system) order for daily suprapubic catheter (a catheter tube inserted through the lower abdomen into the bladder to drain urine) flushes (sterile water was inserted through the catheter tube into the bladder to remove debris or blockage). 2. Treatment nurse did not document a provided treatment or an assessment following a reported suprapubic catheter complication. These failures had the potential to cause a decline in health status. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policies and procedure (P&P) titled, Physician's Orders, dated 11/1/23, indicated, A current list of orders must be maintained in the clinical record of each resident. A review of the admission Record, dated 7/1/22, indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that there was sufficient, qualified nursing staff available at all times to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for nine of 22 sampled residents (Residents 43, 62, 52, 17, 42, 19, 65, 12, and 285), and three of five confidentially interviewed residents, when their call lights were not answered timely and resulted in falls, being left in stool and urine because they were not taken to the bathroom. This failure had the potential to result in skin breakdown, infection, increased pain, increased accidents and injuries, and a decline in physical health status and have a negative impact on the resident's mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a confidential interview of 5 residents on 10/23/2024 at 9:30 AM, three residents responsed, Sometimes they are slow in answering the light when I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to provide meals that were served at a palatable temperature when 10 of 22 sampled residents (Residents 12, 67, 28, 19, 65, 43, 62, 52, 17, and 41), and five of five confidentially interviewed residents, stated the food was cold and bland. This failure had the potential for the residents to experience a loss of appetite, decreased nutrient intake, and result in unintentional weight loss and adverse clinical outcomes. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Assistance with Meals revised March 2023, indicated that, Hot foods shall be held at a temperature of 135 degrees or above until served. Cold foods shall be held at 41 degrees or below until served. Nursing and dietary services will establish procedures such that delivery of food to serving areas accommodates this requirement. 2. To minimize the risk offoodborne illness, the time that potentially hazardous foods remain in the danger zone (41°F to 135 °F) will be kept to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that the kitchen was clean when; 1. An electrical pest control device had a dark substance on the surface. 2. The floor and wall near food preparation areas was covered with black debris and patches of a gray substance. 3. There was grime on the door and doorknob of the food storage room. 4. There were black stains on the ceiling from the air that was blowing out of the vents in two storage rooms. This had the potential of contaminating food that was prepared in these areas and result in germs getting into the residents' food and make them physically sick. Findings: During a kitchen observation conducted on 10/22/24 at 6:30 AM, the following was observed; 1. A white electric pest control device (like a bug Zapper), that hung above the Victory refrigerator was covered with a dark substance. 2. The wall base and floor where the kitchen's large mixer, Victory refrigerator, and the food preparation table, had black debris and patches of gray substances accumulated on the surfaces. 3. There was visible grime and dirt on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6 did not perform hand hygiene (cleaning and disinfecting hands) while doing medication pass (when a nurse goes from resident to resident to give them their prescribed medication). 2. Resident 285's water tumbler's (a water drinking cup that did not have a straw) lid/drinking hole was covered with brown and white spots, dust, and black particles. These failures placed residents receiving medication and Resident 286 at an increased risk of healthcare-associated infections (infections caused by facility practices). Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene revised October 2023, indicated, This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of healthcare-associated infections. Hand Hygiene is indicated: a. immediately before touching a resident; . d. after touching a resident; . e. after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity and respect were maintained for two of 22 sampled residents (Resident 39 and 285) when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A sat behind Resident 39 while assisting her with the lunch meal. 2. Resident 285 received breakfast sixteen minutes after the other resident at her table. These failures resulted in Resident 285 feeling forgotten, and had the potential to result in loss of self-esteem and self-worth for both Resident 39 and 285. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Dignity revised February 2023, indicated, Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem. 5. When assisting with care, residents are supported in exercising their rights. For example, residents are: e. provided with a dignified dining experience. A review of facility's policy titled, Assistance with Meals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment when: 1. The walls in two of 22 sampled resident's (Resident 285 and 76) rooms were unpainted and scratched up. 2. A Hoyer lift (a mobile assistive device that allows residents to be transferred between bed and a chair, by the use of electrical or hydraulic power using a sling to hold the resident), that was used by residents was soiled with dried thick brown and white matter. This deficient practice had the potential to create a poor quality of life that may lead to depression due to the unkept living conditions. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment revised February 2021, indicated Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment 1. A review of Resident 285's admission Record (undated), indicated Resident 285 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses including anxiety disorder, adult failure to thrive (the feeling of wanting to give up on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to The California Department of Public Health (CDPH), when Resident 25 alleged that she heard Resident 20 rape Resident 36, and the facility had not reported this allegation to CDPH. Failing to report allegations of abuse to CDPH created the potential for ongoing undetected resident abuse. Findings: Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia and heart failure. On 8/01/2024, Resident 20 received a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) test to assess his mental function. Resident 20 scored 11 on a scale of 0-15, demonstrating mild cognitive impairment. Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- breathing difficulty related to lung damage). On 8/29/2024, Resident 25 received a BIMS score of 15, demonstrating normal mental function. Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 10 percent (%) medication error rate, when three medication errors out of 30 opportunities were observed during a medication pass. These failures resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's orders which may result in residents not receiving the full therapeutic effects of their medications. Findings: A review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications revised April 2019, indicated, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/23/24 at 7:47 A.M, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6 was observed dispensing medications to Resident 17. LVN 6 prepared 12 medications for Resident 17 including physician orders for: 1. COQ-10 (a dietary supplement that the body uses for growth and maintenance)100 milligrams (mg- a unit of measure) capsule, give two capsules by mouth one time a day (for a total dose of 200 mg). LVN 6 obtained a bottle of COQ-10 50 mg capsules from her medication cart drawer and put two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an open multi-dose vial (contains more than one dose of medication) Tubersol (a solution that aids in the detection of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis-TB, a potentially deadly lung infection) 5TU/0.1mL (Tuberculin units / milliliters, a measurement of the solution for injection) was dated when the vial was opened. This deficient practice had the potential for the TB skin test solution to be outdated and ineffective and therefore, lose the inability to correctly detect TB in a resident or staff member and spread a potentially deadly infection. Findings: A review of the facility policy titled, Medication Labeling and Storage revised February 2023, indicated, 5. Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g., [for example] needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacture specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. During a concurrent observation, interview and review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 27) and five of five confidentially interviewed residents, were offered snacks between meals and at bedtime, without the residents having to ask. This failure had the potential to result in undesired weight loss, hunger, discomfort, and the humiliation of having to ask staff for food. Findings: On 10/23/24 at 9:30 AM, during confidential interviews, five of five residents interviewed indicated that; All five residents indicated that they were not being offered snacks between meals or at bedtime and that they get hungry between meals and at bedtime. One resident stated, They stopped snacks a long time ago. They used to bring it to us. I don't know why they stopped. Another resident stated, We used to get it in the day too. Not now. We don't get anything. They don't offer us anything. Another resident stated, We got them, and it kept our stomachs full but I don't know why they stopped. 2. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, this requirement was not met when the facility failed to follow physician's orders to cover the insertion site during showers for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a nephrostomy tube (a surgically placed tube that drains urine from the kidney into a collection bag when the bladder no longer functions properly). This had the potential to increase the risk of infection, illness, and rehospitalizations. Findings: Resident 1 was a admitted to the facility on [DATE] for multiple fistulas (abnormal connection between body parts) between her bladder, bowel, and vagina. She suffered from frequent urinary tract infections, history of stroke, difficulty walking and was dependent on staff for care of her nephrostomy tube. Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Services, dated 2/21, indicated that, The medical care of each resident is supervised by a licensed physician. Review of an order written by Resident 1's physician on 6/26/24 for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-21 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based in interview and record review the facility failed to ensure direct care staff to meet the needsfor six of nine residents (Residents 2, 3 4 9, 5, and 7) when activities of daily living (toileting showers and hydration) were delayed. This resulted in residents to unrelieved pain, to feel closed in, and forgotten. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled Grievances/Complaints, Filing revised October 2017, indicated Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances (e.g., the State Ombudsman). Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the Grievance Officer will review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report of such findings to the Administrator within five (5) working days of receiving the grievance and/or complaint. All grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be considered. The Grievance Officer, Administrator and Staff will take…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based in interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet the needsfor six of nine residents (Residents 2,3,4,9,5, and 7) when activities of daily living (toileting showers and hydration) were delayed. This resulted in residents to unrelived pain, to feel closed in, and forgotten. Findings: A review of resident council meeting minutes indicated: On 10/19/23 at 10 am, old business call lights not being answered timely on all shifts morning, evening, and night shift, ongoing issue. On 11/30/23 at 10 am, old business call lights not being answered timely on all shifts morning, evening, and night shift, ongoing issue. On 3/22/24 at 2:30 pm, residents have expressed the evening call lights are not being answered and their meal carts are not being delivered on time. During an interview on 4/16/24 at 12:28 pm, Family Member (FM 1) stated resident call lights are not answered timely. FM 1 stated that they have observed their family member's roommate going down to the nursing station to ask for assistance. FM 1 stated her family members urinary bag often…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to address and manage the pain for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to support Resident 1's highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and care plan, when: 1. Resident 1 was having constant pain and did not have routine pain medication. 2. The nursing staff was giving Resident 1 the wrong pain medication for the wrong pain level. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not being properly medicated when she was in severe pain. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Pain medications, revised 10/2010, indicated Pain management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident and is based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals. During a review of the facility's policy titled, Pain-Clinical Protocol, revised 3/2018, indicated: 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nursing staff with necessary competencies and skill sets to meet the care and services for residents' need for two of nine residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when a change of condition was not identified and reported to the physician. These failures resulted increased pain and discomfort for Resident 1 and Resident 2 to have low blood sugars. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record, indicated that she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included vesicovaginal fistula (VVF, is an abnormal opening between the bladder and the vagina that results in continuous and unremitting urinary incontinence), congenital rectovaginal fistula (a rare type of malformation that a connection of the rectum to the vagina. This results in the potential of passing gas or feces through the vagina as it leaks through the fistula), diabetes (high blood glucose), and muscle weakness. Resident 1 was transferred to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a timely Urology consultation (evaluation by a physician who specializes in diseases of genitourinary system) as determined to be necessary and ordered by the MD (Medical Doctor) for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 1) to attain or maintain Resident 1 ' s highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing in accordance with Resident 1 ' s comprehensive assessment and plan of care. This failure resulted in delayed treatment, increased pain and discomfort, and a six-month delay in scheduling/obtaining a Urology consult for Resident 1 who has suffering from multiple Urinary Tract Infection (UTI- bacterial infection in the urine) from 2/2024 to 4/2024, and pain caused by her nephrostomy. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy titled, Referrals, Social Services, revised 12/2008, indicated that: 1. Social Services personnel shall coordinate most resident referrals with outside agencies. 2. Social services will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director (MD) addressed and documented in one of the three sampled residents ' records (Resident 1) that the identified irregularity had been reviewed and acted upon. This failure resulted in Resident 1 suffering from a much worse pain because she was not proper medicated. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy titled, Medication Regiment Review (MRR - Monthly Report), effective date: 6/2021, no revised date given, indicated that: 1. The consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive medication regiment review (MRR) at least monthly. The MRR includes evaluating the resident ' s response to medication therapy to determine that the resident maintains the highest practicable level of functioning and prevents or minimizes adverse consequences related to medication therapy. 2. The findings are phoned, faxed, or e-mailed to the Director of Nursing or designee and documented and stored with the other consultant pharmacist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure for one of four residents (Resident 2) did not receive an unnecessary medication when a diabetic medication was unavailable, the other two diabetic medications were increased and were not adjusted once the medication was available. This resulted in low blood sugars for Resident 2. Finding: A review of a facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised May of 2017, indicated the nurse will notify the physician when there has been an adverse reaction to a medication, need to alter the resident ' s medical treatment, and will make detailed observations, and gather relevant information for the physician. A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated, she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses 3 which included type 2 diabetes, heart disease. Resident 2 was able to make her own health care decisions. During an interview on 4/17/24 at 10 am, Resident 2 stated the breakfast quiche was terrible today and her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-21 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of laboratory results for one of 3 sampled Resident (Resident 1), when: 1. Resident 1 ' s urinalysis (UA, a urine specimen that determines if there is a bacterial infection in the urine, as urinary tract infection - UTI) was obtained on 4/13/2024, two days after the physician placed the order on 4/11/2024. 2. The facility failed to notify the physician when the Urine Culture & Sensitivity (Culture- a lab test to check for bacteria or other germs in a urine sample; Sensitivity- determines the effectiveness of antibiotics against microorganisms) was reported on 4/15/2024. These failures resulted in delayed treatment, increased Resident 1 ' s pain and discomfort. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s policy titled, Nursing Services Policy and Procedure Manual for Long-Term Care, Managing Infection, revised 3/2022, indicated: 1. A nurse will assess a resident with a suspected infection and will document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to fully inform resident's representatives (RP) of the residents' dental health status and allow participation in decision making for care to be provided for 3 of 5 residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3) and their RP's, when RP 1, 2, and 3 were not notified of oral issues and changes of conditions identified by the Registered Dental Hygienist of Alternative Practice (RDHAP), and the potential need for a dentist consult. 1. RDHAP's evaluation indicated Resident 1 demonstrated several missing teeth, visible cavitation (permanently damaged area of hard part of tooth with decay that become tiny openings), retained roots, and general demineralization (outermost layer of tooth starts to weaken and deteriorate), and RP 1 was not notified. 2. RDHAP's evaluation indicated that Resident 2 demonstrated several missing teeth, retained roots, general demineralization, and fractured teeth, and RP 2 was not notified. 3. RDHAP's evaluation indicated that Resident 3 demonstrated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately evaluate and record assessments reflective of the resident's dental status for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4), when the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool used to evaluate problems for care planning and interventions), indicated that: 1. Resident 1 did not have cavities (permanently damaged area of hard part of tooth with decay that become tiny openings),or broken natural teeth. 2. Resident 2 , did not have cavities (permanently damaged area of hard part of tooth with decay that become tiny openings),or broken natural teeth. 3. Resident 3 did not have cavities (permanently damaged area of hard part of tooth with decay that become tiny openings),or broken natural teeth. 4. Resident 4 was coded as endentulous meaning no teeth or dentures when Resident 4 had a full set of dentures. These failures had the potential to result in mismanagement of the resident's dental health status by not identifying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to pursue routine or emergency dental services with a Dentist to inspect, diagnose, obtain diagnostic testing, and provide treatment when 3 of 5 residents sampled for dental care (Residents 1, 2, 3), were evaluated by the Registered Dental Hygienist of Alternative Practice (RDHAP), who identified dental problems and there was no follow up with a Dentist. 1. Resident 1 was identified to have cavities (permanently damaged area of hard part of tooth with decay that become tiny openings) and retained roots and was not referred to a dentist. 2. Resident 2 was identified to have retained roots and fractured teeth and was not referred to a dentist. 3. Resident 3 was identified to have white spot lesions and cavities and was not referred to a dentist. These failures had the potential to result in progressive oral health decline, loss of teeth, oral pain, infection, reduced appetite, loss of weight, with overall health and emotional deterioration.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged verbal abuse incident to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) State Survey Agency within two hours for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 alleged Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 yelled at her and called her a liar in front of everyone in the dining room. Resident 1 ' s allegation of verbal abuse was made on 11/28/2023 and the first report CDPH the State Survey Agency received from the facility was on 12/1/2023. This failure had the potential to delay the investigation and affect the psychosocial well-being of Resident 1 and subject other residents to verbal abuse. Findings: During a review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated July 2017, indicated all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source will be reported by the facility Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following persons or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and nursing schedule review, the facility failed to ensure that there was a Registered Nurse (RN) on duty 8 hours per day/ 7 days a week. This failure had the potential to adversely affect resident's quality of care and quality of life with regards to overall health and well-being. Findings: A review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, an electronic system for facilities to submit staffing information), for Fiscal Year Quarter 4 for 2022, (7/01-09/30/22), indicated the facility had no RN on duty for; 7/2 Saturday (Sa), 7/31 Sunday (Su), 8/6 Sa, 9/24 (Sa), and 9/25/22 Su. A review of the PBJ for Fiscal Year Quarter 1 for 2023, (10/1-12/31/23), indicated the facility had no RN on duty for; 10/1 (Sa), 10/8 (Sa), 10/23 (Su), 11/6 (Su), 11/12 (Sa), 11/20 (Su), 11/24 Thursday (Th), 11/26 (Sa), 11/27 (Su), 12/4 (Su), 12/11 (Su), 12/17 (Sa), 12/18 (Su), 12/23 Friday (Fr), and 12/25/23 Su. During an interview on 8/3/23 at 3:50 pm, the Director of Nursing confirmed, We have had just a few shifts without a RN.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and 6 confidentially interviewed residents, the facility failed to ensure meals and snacks met resident needs when food was not palatable, (was bland, had no flavor), and was not at the correct temperatures, (hot food was not hot, cold drinks were not cold), and meals were not served on time. This failure had the potential to result in decreased resident meal intakes, loss of appetites, weight loss and negatively impact their nutritional status, health status and quality of life. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food Temperatures Policy, revised 3/1/18, the P&P indicated, Hot food items may not fall below 140 degrees [Fahrenheit], after cooking . All cold food items must be stored and served at a temperature of 41 degrees or below. Foods should be transported as quickly as possible to maintain temperatures for delivery and service. During an observation of lunch meal trays in the Assistive Dining Room, (residents that required help with meals), and concurrent interview with Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a home like environment for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 29) when comfortable sound levels were not maintained. This failure resulted in Resident 29 losing sleep at night and caused frustration with uncontrolled noise that interfered with Resident 29's quality of life. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Noise Control, revised April 2014, indicated, The facility strives to maintain comfortable sound levels that enhance privacy when privacy is desired. This policy indicated Sound level of radios and televisions shall not disturb other residents, their families, or visitors. Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses that included left femur fracture (broken bone of the upper leg), diabetes, heart disease, and anxiety (feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness). During a record review of Resident 29's Minimum Data Set, (MDS, a resident assessment tool), the MDS indicated that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 70), who experienced a significant change in condition, was comprehensively assessed using the CMS-specified Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process within 14 days of the change in condition. This failure had the potential for staff to not be fully informed of Resident 70's health status in order to determine the need for further assessment and interventions that could potentially delay care and negatively impact her health condition. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Assessments, revised March 2022, indicated, Comprehensive assessments are conducted to assist in developing person-centered care plans. Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA)-The SCSA is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed when the Interdisciplinary Team, (IDT, a group of dedicated healthcare professionals who work together to provide specific care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 70), following a significant change in condition with a new order for comfort care (the goal of care to keep the resident comfortable by managing pain and symptoms, and relieving anxiety, to improve the quality of life while allowing death to occur naturally), measures. This failure had the potential for staff not to be aware of Resident 70's end of life choices and comfort wishes. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives, and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. This facility's policy also indicated, Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the residents' conditions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 326), was administered and inhaler according to manufacturer's specifications when; the Director of Staff Development (DSD) administered Advair Diskus (a medication inhaled through the mouth into the lungs), without explaining the procedure to Resident 326, without ensuring her mouth was rinsed with water after the inhalation, and tilted the inhaler upwards, instead of keeping flat. This failure had the potential to cause the medication to be ineffective and result in a mouth infection. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications through A Metered Dose Inhaler, revised October 2010, indicated Explain the procedure to the resident. Ask the resident to inhale and exhale deeply for a few breath cycles. On the last cycle, instruct the resident to exhale deeply. Place the mouthpiece in the mouth and instruct resident to close his or her lips to form a seal around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide physician ordered therapeutic diets (a modified diet for nutrients, calories and textures), for two out of six sampled residents, (Resident 16 and 47), when they had not recieved fortified (added nutrients) pudding with their meals. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the necessary essential nutrition required and desired weight goals for these residents and have a negative affect on their health status. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Therapeutic Diets, revised 10/1/17, the P&P indicated, resident diets would be determined, with the resident's informed choices, preferences, treatment goals, and wishes. The P&P indicated, A therapeutic diet is considered a diet ordered by a physician, practitioner, or dietician, as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, to modify nutrients in the diet . A review of Resident 16's records indicated admission to the facility on 5/20/23 with the diagnoses of small cell B-cell lymphoma (cancer that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure professional food safety and sanitation practices were in place when: 1. A table located in the dry storage area that had various boxes of food items stored on the top was visibly dirty with loose food debris. 2. Foods were stored in the dry storage area and in the refrigerator without being labeled and having use by dates. 3. Two unopened containers of half and half (a mixture of cream and milk), were expired and placed behind newer containers of half and half. 4. The floor under the kitchen's washing station was slimy and visibly dirty. 5. The grill was not cleaned after breakfast and contained food particles. 6. The unit refrigerator on Nurse Station Unit 1 had an opened Starbucks coffee drink that belonged to a staff member and the unit refrigerator on Nurse Station Unit 2 contained a yogurt and protein drink that belonged to staff and was visibly dirty. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.0-2.0 vs chain
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Briarcrest Nursing CenterBell Gardens, CA 1 of 5Glendale Post Acute CenterGlendale, CA 1 of 5Huntington Drive Health And Rehabilitation CenterArcadia, CA 1 of 5Laguna Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterLaguna Hills, CA 1 of 5Madera Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterMadera, CA 1 of 5Monrovia Gardens Healthcare CenterMonrovia, CA 1 of 5Rinaldi Convalescent HospitalGranada Hills, CA 1 of 5Valley Palms Care CenterN Hollywood, CA 2 of 5Casitas Care CenterGranada Hills, CA 2 of 5Harbor Villa Care CenterAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Lynwood Post Acute Care CenterLynwood, CA 2 of 5Monte Vista Healthcare CenterDuarte, CA 2 of 5Mountain View Conv HospSylmar, CA 2 of 5Murrieta Health And Rehabilitation CenterMurrieta, CA 2 of 5Seal Beach Health And Rehabilitation CenterSeal Beach, CA 3 of 5Anaheim Crest Nursing CenterAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Broadway Healthcare CenterSan Gabriel, CA 3 of 5Buena Vista Care CenterAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Highland Care Center of RedlandsRedlands, CA 3 of 5La Sierra Care CenterMerced, CA 3 of 5Professional Post Acute CenterSan Rafael, CA 3 of 5Watsonville Nursing CenterWatsonville, CA 3 of 5West Covina Healthcare CenterWest Covina, CA 4 of 5Country Manor La Mesa Healthcare CenterLa Mesa, CA 4 of 5Glendale Healthcare CenterGlendale, CA 4 of 5Merced Nursing & Rehabilitation CtrMerced, CA 4 of 5Rancho Mirage Health And Rehabilitation CenterRancho Mirage, CA 5 of 5Modesto Post Acute CenterModesto, CA 5 of 5Ontario Healthcare CenterOntario, CA 5 of 5Watsonville Post Acute CenterWatsonville, CANot rated (Special Focus)Sunray Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CRESCENT FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/19/2006
BERING PROPERTIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 02/01/2007
JENMAX ENTERPRISES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF23%since 02/01/2007
JK-CSH JV LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF12%since 11/01/2006
MANHATTAN FIVE PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 11/01/2006
WIN WIN ENTERPRISES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF35%since 02/01/2007
BH ALLIANCEOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2006
THE JACOB WINTNER TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2006
THE WINTNER LIVING TRUST DATED 7/08/1992OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2007
WINTNER, JACOBIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2007
BRETSCH, GREGORYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/25/2019
FITZGERALD, LORRIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/04/2024
SMEDRA, IRAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2007
CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2014
BUTENKO, JULIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/24/2023
CAPELA, HEIDIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2023
HASSELL, LANCEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2022
LUTZ, LINDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2012
SALAZAR, PAULINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/14/2020
SHARMA, AISHWARYAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2025
SWARTZ, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/02/2019
2005 RIVER, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2010

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 23%Other / private 1%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$410per resident / day
operating cost
$12,470per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$445per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056231. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next