Glendale Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 152 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 42.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 45.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly wash dishware when the water temperature was lower than manufacturer specifications. This deficient practice has the potential to result in harmful bacterial growth that could lead to foodborne illness (a disease caused by consuming food or drinks that are contaminated by germs or toxins) in all medically compromised residents.Findings: During an observation on 2/18/2026 at 8:51 AM, Dietary Aide 1 (DA1) was operating a low-temperature dishwasher (commercial ware washers that clean at 120 -140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) water temperature and rely on chemical sanitizers) to wash plate ware from breakfast service where the water reservoir thermometer read 98 F. During a concurrent interview with Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) she stated that water temperature varies during usage and should be 120 F at the beginning of dishwashing. During a concurrent record review, a poster issued by the manufacturer of the dishwashing machine placed on the wall facing where DA1 was working indicated It is recommended…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual skills competency assessments for four of seven sampled nursing staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVN] 2, Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 2, CNA 3, and CNA 4) as required in their Facility Assessment (a yearly review that identifies the staff, equipment, and resources the facility needs to safely and effectively care of its residents). This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for unmet care needs and care errors related to activities of daily living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves), hand hygiene (the practice of cleaning one's hands-either by washing with soap and water or using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer-to remove dirt, germs, and pathogens, thereby preventing the spread of infections), and measuring vital signs (VS) and intake / output (I/O). Findings: During a review of LVN 2's employee file, the file indicated LVN 2's last competency evaluation was done on 4/16/2024. During a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven residents sampled for pressure injury prevention (Resident 1), who had multiple pressure injuries, received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice when Resident 1's low air loss mattress (LAL- a medical support surface that uses a constant flow of air to reduce pressure, heat, and moisture on the skin to help prevent or treat pressure injuries) was set to an incorrect setting. Based on Resident 1's weight of 161 pounds (lbs- a unit of weight), the LAL setting should have been at level 3. During the survey observation, Resident 1's LAL setting was found to be set at level 4. This failure had the potential to cause further worsening of Resident 1's pressure injuries. A misconfigured mattresses that is not aligned with the resident's weight may also compromise the resident's stability while in bed, increasing the risk of accidents or injury. During a review of Resident 1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications (unexpected problems that may arise during treatment) of enteral feedings (liquid nutrition through a flexible tube that goes in directly into the stomach) for two of three sampled residents ( Residents 36 and 25) who was observed receiving enteral feeding continuously with head of bed (HOB) less than 30 degrees in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Enteral Feedings - Safety Precautions This deficient practice had the potential to result in vomiting and/or aspiration pneumonia (severe lung infection) that could negatively affect Resident 36 and 25 qualities of life. Findings: 1. During review of Resident 36's admission Record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included attention to gastrostomy (G-tube-a surgically placed device used to give direct access to the stomach for supplemental feeding),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 don (put on) an isolation gown (designed to protect healthcare workers from blood, bodily fluids, and contaminants by covering the torso, arms, and back) when providing care for one of one sampled residents (Resident 7) who was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread multidrug resistant organisms [MDRO- disease causing organism resistant to medication used to treat infection]) due to the resident having a Sacro coccyx (near the lower back and spine) wound. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 7 acquiring MDROs and/or spreading MDROs to other residents in the facility which could result in wide spread infection in the facility affecting their health and quality of life. Findings: During review of Resident 7's admission Record indicated Resident 7 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan (a treatment plan that focused on the needs and preferences of a resident or individual) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for anticoagulant (a medicine that prevented blood clots from forming in the bloodstream) and antiplatelet (a type of medicine that prevented platelets [a type of blood cell] from sticking together and forming a blood clot) medication by failing to implement a care plan for apixaban (also known as Eliquis, a type of medicine known as a blood thinner) and clopidogrel bisulfate (also known as Plavix, a medicine that prevented blood clots by making your blood cells [platelets] less sticky). These deficient practices had the potential for a lack of individualized care and to affect the quality of services provided to Resident 1.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, intervene and evaluate care of two out of three sampled residents (Residents 28 and 31) by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 28's wound on the left eye was identified and assessed by facility to ensure resident received timely and appropriate care for behavior of self -inflicted wound and scratching under the left eye. 2. Ensure Resident 31's daily episodes of emesis (vomit) where documented, assessed for the root cause, monitored and reported to the primary physician. As a result of these deficient practices, Resident 28 could develop worsened skin and wound infection and severe pain. For Resident 31 frequent vomiting could result in dehydration (significant fluid loss in the body) and electrolytes (essential minerals in the body for the cells to function) loss that leads to and organ failures. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 31's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/27/2021, with diagnoses that included gastro- esophageal reflux disease (Acid reflux, a condition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 19) had an informed consent (the voluntary agreement of a resident or a resident's representative to accept a treatment or procedure after receiving information regarding risks and benefits of the treatment) prior to treatment of Amitriptyline (a medication used to treat depression [severe feeling of sadness and hopelessness] and neuropathic [damaged nerves] pain in adults). This failure violated the residents rights of Resident 19 or representative to make an informed decision about the treatments of Amitriptyline and its side effects such as increased agitation, irritability and worsened depression of the medication and any alternative treatments available. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record (Face Sheet), dated 1/23/2025, the face sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including polyneuropathy (damage to many…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of eight sampled residents (Residents 15 and 195) had a call light device (a device used to call for assistance) within reach. This failure had the potential to result in Residents 15 and 195 being unable to call for assistance when needed and not receive immediate care in the an emergency that could lead to falls, accidents and injury. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 15 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet) dated 1/23/2025 , the face sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 15 on 11/20/2019 with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic progressive disease-causing inflammation in the joints and resulting in painful deformity and immobility), contracture (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion) of left knee, and tear of meniscus (crescent shaped bands of thick, rubbery cartilage attached to the shinbone that act as shock absorbers and stabilize the knee) of the left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the primary physician of the signitficant change of condition for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 31) who had daily episodes of vomiting for unknown period of time. This deficient practice resulted in the resident's delay in treatment and monitoring to prevent fluid loss, discomfort and weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 31's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/27/2021, with diagnoses that included Gastro- esophageal reflux disease (Acid reflux, a condition where stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus), intervertebral disc degeneration (spine loses ability to cushion the vertebrae) and kidney disease. A review of Resident 31's Minimum Data Set (MDS- A comprehensive assessment and screening tool) Dated 12/1/2024, indicated Resident 31 had severely impaired cognition (a mental process that take place in in the brain, including thinking, attention, language, learning, memory, and perception) and required maximal assistance with activities of daily living. During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $606K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA