Modesto Post Acute Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 129 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 95.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor six out of six sampled residents ' (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 6) rights when they all were given written notices they would have to move into different rooms in the facility with no existing reason to do so, despite some of the residents having resided in their rooms for several years. This failure resulted in: 1. The potential for more than minimal harm for Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 5, and Resident 6 when their collective right to a respectful and dignified existence was not honored by failing to allow all six residents ' rights to self-determination, affecting their right to a respectful and dignified environment, by not allowing them to remain in their rooms that had been their home for years which the residents strongly objected to, and, 2. Actual harm to Resident 4 when her mood and behavior changed, exhibiting increased irritability, depression, sadness, loss of health or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure garbage storage area was maintained in safe and sanitary conditions when:1. Grayish fluids from the sewer and thick yellowish drainage from the grease trap were draining creating a pool into the driveway on 3/17/26.2. Two of the three garbage bins did not have a lid and were open to air on 3/18/26.These failures had the potential for unwanted pest ((any organism-insect, rodent, or microbe-those damages structures or threatens human health) which could have led to disease transmission causing foodborne illness (results from eating food contaminated with germs [bacteria, viruses, parasites] or toxins) leading to hospitalization for 98 residents, vendors, guests and staff.Findings:During an observation on 3/17/26 at 10:02 a.m. in the backway alley, a water outlet had grayish fluids gushing out and a grease trap to the right, had thick yellowish fluids flowing down gathering with the grayish fluids creating a pool in front of the garbage bins in the driveway. There was a musty, rotten, foul odor resembling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promote and implement an antibiotic (ATB) stewardship and surveillance program (ATBS- designed to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics and to limit the spread of antibiotic resistance in bacteria) for the use of antibiotics when:Infection screening evaluations (ISE-completed before starting antibiotics to ensure the medication is necessary, effective, and targeted) were not completed before residents started antibiotics.Antibiotics discontinued after initiation, for not meeting infection screening evaluation criteria, were not included in antibiotic stewardship data review or monitoring for 2/2026.This failure resulted in the administration of unnecessary and inappropriate antibiotic use, as well as inaccurate monitoring of antibiotic use which could lead to antibiotic-resistant organisms and inaccurate data monitoring and reporting.During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/20/26 at 12:54 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the facility's document titled, Infection Prevention and Control Surveillance Log…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared safely in accordance with professional standards of food service safety for 95 out of 98 residents receiving food at the facility when:1. An open bag of potato chips inside a zip lock bag did not have a use by (a crucial safety indicator found on perishable foods like meats and salads, marking when it is no longer safe to eat, even if it appears fine) date.2. The food preparation sink did not have an air gap (space between the end of sink pipe and top of sink to prevent backflow). These failures had the potential to result in the serving of expired, spoiled, or contaminated food and items which could result in foodborne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins) to 95 residents receiving food from the kitchen.Findings:During an observation current observation on 3/17/26 at 9:31 a.m. in the storage room with the Certified Dietary Manger (CDM), a zip lock bag containing an open bag of potato chip was not labeled with a use by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 10 sampled residents (Resident 74 and Resident 75) were informed, in advance, by the physician or other practitioner, of the risks and benefits of proposed treatment when:1. Resident 74 did not have a signed physician informed consent (a process in which a healthcare professional educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention) prior to receiving psychotropic (a drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) medications Mirtazapine (a drug used to treat depression) and buspirone (a medication used to treat generalized anxiety disorder).2. Resident 75 had an order for [Brand name for lorazepam] (psychotropic, anti-anxiety medication used to alter mood and behavior) as needed and the informed consent was not signed by the provider.These failures resulted in the violation of Resident 74 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment was maintained for one of eight sampled residents (Res 2) when the Resident's Clothing and Possession Inventory on admission (RCPIA-a sheet used for inventorying residents' personal items) was not updated to reflect current items in the closet on 3/20/26.This failure resulted in Res 2's personal items being inaccurately inventoried, which could lead to clothing and items being unaccounted for when missing and has the potential to cause upset and inconvenience for residents and their families.Findings:During a review of Res 2' s admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 3/20/26, the AR indicated Res 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), acute kidney failure (sudden decrease in kidney function occurring over hours or days, causing waste buildup,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise and implement, in a timely manner, a person-centered comprehensive care plan (CP- a personalized, written document detailing an individual's health needs, goals, and the specific services or support required to manage them) for two of eight residents (Res 2 and Res 70) when:1. Res 2 's had continued CP' for not swallowing and pocketing (the act of holding food in the mouth) food when returned from the hospital with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG tube-a feeding tube inserted through the abdomen into the stomach) and was NPO (nothing by mouth) on 12/22/24.2. Res 70's had a continued short term care plan to observe for dark amber urine past the 48-to-72-hour timeframe.These failures had the potential to result in the goals and care interventions for Res 2 and Res 70 not being resident-centered and failing to adequately meet their needs.Findings:1.During an interview on 3/17/26 at 2:47 p.m. with Family Member (FM) 1, FM 1 stated she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice for two of six sampled residents (Resident 87 and 104) when:1.Resident 87 was administered amiodarone (blood pressure [force of blood pushing against artery walls] medication used to treat irregular heart rhythms), four times, outside of ordered parameters. This failure resulted in Resident 87 receiving amiodarone on 2/3/26, 2/5/26, 2/13/26 and 3/11/26 when it should have been held, according to order parameters, which could lead to decreased blood pressure, cardiac distress and adverse effects. 2.The facility failed to ensure a physician order was received for an Incentive Spirometer (IS - handheld plastic device that acts as exercise equipment for the lungs, helping take slow, deep breaths to keep them active and clear after surgery or illness), for one of nine residents (Resident 104).This failure had the potential to delay strengthening of respiratory muscles, lung capacity, and clearing of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure vegetables were prepared to conserve appearance and palpability for three of eight sampled residents (Res 25, Res 60 and Res 69) when the Italian blend vegetables with carrots and squashes were soft and mushy, and string beans were split in half with bean pods exposed for lunch served on 3/19/26.,This failure had the potential to result in vegetables not being consumed for Res 25, Res 60 and Res 69 and not meeting their recommended daily allowance (RDA- the average daily dietary intake level sufficient to meet the nutrient requirements of nearly all (97.5 percent) healthy) leading to malnutrition (a dangerous imbalance between the nutrients the body needs and those it receives).Findings:During a review of Res's 25 admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 3/20/26, the AR indicated Res 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for one of four sampled residents (Resident 103) when Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) was not worn during care for Resident 103 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms [bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics] that requires gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). This failure placed Resident 103 at risk for cross-contamination (the process when germs are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, which causes a harmful effect) and infection (an invasion of the body by germs that cause disease).Findings:During an observation on 3/17/26 at 11:19 a.m. outside Resident 103's room, an EBP sign was observed on Resident 103's door, and a green sticker was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was noted to have pain, bruising, and swelling to her right hand and wrist; and discoloration to her left wrist. This failure resulted in Resident 1's injuries of an unknown source to not be investigated, placing Resident 1 at potential risk for harm and/or abuse, and delayed medical intervention. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) , dated 5/20/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was a [AGE] year-old female with medical diagnoses that included dementia (progressive disease of the brain affecting memory, judgement, and mood), schizophrenia (mental illness affecting perceptions of reality), disorders of the bone, other disorders of the brain, disorientation, need for assistance with personal care, bipolar disorder (mental illness with extreme shifts in mood, behavior, and energy), muscle weakness, and others. During a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA