Professional Post Acute Center
81 Professional Center Parkway, San Rafael, CA 94903 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (415) 479-5161 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607, F0609) — most recent Feb 2025
- it has 7 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (77) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $148,455 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-08)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 1.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.74 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.88 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
29.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 29.0%CMS range 18.8–45.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.2–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 84.0 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
77 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of falls for one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents when the facility:1. Did not initiate a person-centered care plan for Resident 1's fall risk prior to [DATE]; and,2. Did not analyze Resident 1's risk for a fall after worsening edema (swelling from an accumulation of fluid in the body's tissues) and possible deep vein thrombosis (DVT, a blood clot in a deep vein which can cause pain and swelling) in her lower legs.These failures contributed to Resident 1 sustaining a left fibula (one of the two bones in the calf) [NAME] fracture (a break of the upper fibula usually caused by twisting or forceful rotation of the ankle) from a fall. Cross reference F557.Findings:1. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of venous insufficiency (a condition where the veins in the legs have difficulty in returning blood to the heart, often causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident 1) in a census of 86 residents received adequate pain management consistent with nursing standards of practice, the resident's individualized care plan, the resident's preferences, and facility policy. Resident 1 described his pain as severe and stated it was #5-9 (moderate to severe) on the pain scale (Pain Scale: a tool health care professionals utilize to help assess a person's pain; the pain scale is from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain, and 10 is the worst pain imaginable) and his physician ordered him to receive Hydromorphone (also know as Dilaudid; a narcotic pain medication) 4 mg (milligrams) every 4 hours on a scheduled basis. Licensed nurses did not administer Hydromorphone as ordered by the physician because the facility ran out of the medication; nurses did not consistently access and administer Hydromorphone from the emergency medication supply (known as an e-kit); nursing staff did not notify Resident 1's physician (Physician J) when they were unable to administer his pain medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to assess and provide necessary services to prevent the worsening of facility-acquired pressure ulcer (injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was found to have an open wound on her sacrum (the triangular bone just below the backbone) and coccyx (the tailbone) and the facility failed to: 1. Obtain a doctor ' s order for a routine wound treatment when a sacral wound was identified; 2. Assess and document the status of wound perimeter (refers to the surrounding area of the wound edge), wound bed (the base or open area of a wound) and healing progress as part of the pressure ulcer care plan; and 3. Conduct a comprehensive nutritional assessment for Resident 1 according to facility policy on Prevention of Pressure Injuries (localized damage to the skin as well as underlying soft tissue, usually occurring over a bony prominence or related to medical devices). These failures resulted to the worsening of Resident 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to provide staff supervision for transfer and ambulation to one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 required extensive (resident involved in activity; staff provide weightbearing support [staff supports some of the weight of the resident]) one-person physical assist with transfers and ambulation and was found lying at the hallway. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a right femoral fracture (a break in the thigh bone) and subsequently had a significant physical functional (the ability to perform basic and instrumental activities of daily living) decline. Findings: During a review of the Face sheet (A one-page summary of important information about a resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to: Diabetes Mellitus (disease that result in too much sugar in the blood); Hypertension (High Blood Pressure); and Neurocognitive Disorder (decreased mental function due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2021-05-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure eight residents (Residents 2, 23, 54, 56, 62, 67, 72, 235) were free from verbal abuse and neglect by staff, including Staff I (Licensed Nurse), when: 1) Staff I communicated with residents in ways that caused discomfort to both residents and staff. 2) Staff I intimidated Resident 235 and Resident 54. 3) Resident 2 was afraid to ask Staff I for his as-needed pain medication to manage moderate or severe pain. 4) Six Residents in Resident Council vocalized fear of retaliation from Staff I. 5) Resident 23, Resident 2, Resident 62, Resident 67, and Resident 72 observed nursing staff sleeping during regular work hours at night. These failures resulted in residents feeling humiliated, angry, unwanted, no dignity, ignored and in constant pain due to medication withheld and fear of retaliation from staff and unnecessary illness. Findings: 1) During an interview on [DATE] at 10:50 a.m., Resident 56 stated that Staff I (License Nurse) called…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2021-05-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse policy and procedure for one resident (Resident 56), when Resident 56 complained to Staff C (Social Worker) of potential abuse by Staff I (Licensed Nurse) with did not utilitze this knowledge and implement the facility's abuse policies. This failure resulted in Resident 56 not being free from abuse and being subjected to verbal abuse by staff and neglect that lead to anger, humiliation, and physical pain. Findings: During an interview on 5/10/21 at 10:50 a.m., Resident 56 stated that Staff I (License Nurse) called him racial names such as are you Portuguese, are you Chinese, are you Cuban, are you gay? Resident 56 stated that he reported to the Ombudsman (A State official who investigates complaints) and to Staff C. Resident 56 stated this language made him feel angry and racially profiled. During an interview on 5/14/2021 at 10:30 a.m., Staff O (Unlicensed staff) stated that Staff I was very mean to Resident 56. Staff O stated that she heard Staff I called Resident 56 you are cholo [(Mexican associated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-05-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to State Agency an allegation of verbal abuse to the appropriate agencies for one resident (Resident 56), when Resident 56 complained about repeated, offensive communication from a licensed nurse and facility staff did not escalate the concern to the facility administrator or investigate the complaint. This failure resulted in delay of a State Survey Agency and facility investigation into verbal abuse affecting Resident 56, did not ensure Resident 56's safety, and caused feelings of anger, humiliation and racially profiling. Findings: Resident 56 During an interview on 5/10/2021 at 10:50 a.m., Resident 56 stated that Staff I (Licensed Nurse) called him different names. Resident 56 stated that Staff I called him Are you gay, Are you a Portuguese, Are you Chinese? Resident 56 stated that he was angry and that Staff I was racial profiling him. Resident 56 stated that he reported the incident to the Ombudsman and to Staff C (Social Worker). During an interview on 5/12/2021 at 11 a.m., Ombudsman stated that he called…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility nurses failed to notify the physician when one resident (Resident 1), out of five sampled residents, did not consume the minimum amounts of fluid and nutrition the Registered Dietitian's (RD) calculated for Resident 1 in April 2026.This failure contributed to Resident 1's hospitalization with a diagnosis of hypovolemia (a critical condition in which there is a low volume of fluid in the body, often caused by dehydration) on 4/30/26.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder (a chronic mental health disorder characterized by combinations of hallucinations, delusions, a mood disorder (mania or depression), hypothyroidism (a condition where the thyroid gland does not produce enough hormones to regulate your body's metabolism), and generalized weakness.A review of all of Resident 1's care plans indicated the following goals and interventions: A care plan dated 11/15/21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident representative of a decline in condition for one of three sampled residents, Resident 1, when Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital and Resident 1's family member (FM) was not informed. This failure caused FM to feel angry and confused when she learned Resident 1 was hospitalized from hospital staff who had called from the intensive care unit (ICU) to inform her Resident 1 was in critical condition and being intubated (a procedure where a breathing tube is inserted into the airway to bring oxygen to the lungs).During a phone interview on 5/4/26 at 8:58 a.m., FM stated she was the primary contact for the facility staff to call whenever there was a change in Resident 1's condition. FM stated on the night of 4/30/26, around 9 p.m. she received a phone call from staff at the local acute care hospital. FM stated the hospital staff told her Resident 1 was in the ICU in critical condition, they needed to intubate her and they needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of quality were delivered for one out of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was left to self-administer his medications despite not having a medication self-administration assessment completed.This failure creates risks of medication errors such as overdose or missed doses, adverse drug interactions, and potential resident injury.Findings:A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date to the facility in 1/2019 with diagnoses of Hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), Hemiparesis (a neurological condition characterized by partial weakness, reduced strength, or impaired motor function on one side of the body) and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).A review of Resident 1's admission/readmission data tool, dated 8/14/24, indicated Resident 1 did not want to self-administer medications.A review of Resident 1's Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were in locked compartments and only accessible for authorized persons for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when medications were left on Resident 1's bedside table.This failure put the residents at high risks for unauthorized access to the medications, ingestion by the wrong resident with possible adverse reactions.Findings:A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date to the facility in 1/2019 with diagnoses of Hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), Hemiparesis (a neurological condition characterized by partial weakness, reduced strength, or impaired motor function on one side of the body and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/4/26 at 8:53 a.m., Resident 1 was noted to have a medicine cup labeled 18B containing three pills on top of his overbed table. Resident 1 stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one resident (Resident 1) to retain her personal recliner chair which assisted in supporting Resident 1's lower back and venous insufficiency (a condition where the veins in the legs have difficulty in returning blood to the heart, often causing swelling and pain).This failure resulted in Resident 1 enduring back and leg pain. Cross reference F689.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of venous insufficiency (a condition where the veins in the legs have difficulty in returning blood to the heart, often causing swelling and pain), morbid obesity (a disorder that involves having too much body fat, which increases the risk of serious health problems such as joint pain from excess weight), and personality disorder (a mental health condition characterized where people have a pattern of seeing themselves and reacting to other others in ways that cause problems).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment for one out of four sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3's commode (a portable toilet, often resembling a chair, designed for individuals with mobility limitations who may have difficulty accessing a traditional toilet) bucket (removable container of the commode that collects wastes) was covered with a blanket.This failure has the potential to spread germs and cause infections. Findings:A review of Resident 3's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) indicated an admission date of 7/2025 with a diagnosis of Pain in right knee and difficulty in walking.During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/8/25 at 12:17 p.m., Resident 3's commode bucket was covered with blanket. Resident 3 stated he had not been given a commode with a lid for the bucket. Resident 3 confirmed staff covered the commode bucket with a blanket.During an interview on 7/8/25 at 12:25 p.m., Unlicensed Staff B verified Resident 3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) received care consistent with nursing professional standards of quality and the resident's individualized nursing care plan (document that contains essential information about a patient's condition, diagnosis, goals, interventions, and outcomes) when Resident 1 had symptoms consistent with a urinary tract infection (UTI- infection in any part of the urinary system, including the bladder and kidneys)over the period of approximately one month (approximately 3/5/2025 to 4/7/2025), including bladder pain and blood in her urine (hematuria), but nursing staff did not ensure her provider (physician or nurse practitioner) was notified, a urinalysis (test of urine; used to detect infection) was obtained, and the hematuria was monitored. This failure contributed to Resident 1 experiencing bladder pain for approximately four weeks, potentially delayed treatment of her UTI, and placed her at risk for kidney infection, kidney damage and sepsis (life-threatening blood infection).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 1) of four sampled residents was free from physical abuse when Resident 2 squeezed Resident 1 ' s left arm causing bruising and pain to Resident 1. This failure resulted in a physical injury and emotional distress to Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with Radiculopathy (injury or damage to nerve roots in the area where they leave the spine) and unspecified psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality). A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 11/14/24, indicated her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score was 4, which indicated severe cognitive (relating to processes of thinking and reasoning) impairment. Resident 2 was admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to act upon pharmacy recommendation for 1 (Resident #73) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, psychotropic medication, and medication regimen review. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Regimen Review (Monthly Report), with an effective date of 06/2021, indicated, The consultant pharmacist performs a comprehensive medication regiment review (MRR) at least monthly. The MRR includes evaluating the resident's response to medication therapy to determine that the resident maintains the highest practicable level of functioning and prevents or minimizes adverse consequences related to the medication therapy. The policy directed, E. Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and or the prescriber. 1) Physician accepts and acts upon suggestion or rejects and provides an explanation for disagreeing by the next physician visit. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #73 on 09/07/2023. According to the admission Record, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of 5% or less. There were two medication errors out of 27 opportunities, which yielded a medication error rate of 7.41% for 1 resident (Resident #10) of 4 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 04/2023, indicated, Medication are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Per the policy, 9. The individual administering the medication checks the label to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #10 on 11/05/2015. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of unspecified iron deficiency anemia, presence of a right artificial knee joint, contracture of the left knee, and generalized muscle weakness. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 60 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the right one of seven sampled residents, Resident 1, to be free from physical abuse when, Resident 1, who had a history of yelling and screaming due to hallucinations, was slapped on the left side of her face by another resident, Resident 2, who had a care planned intervention to modify her environment by reducing the noise level due to a potential to demonstrate aggressive behavior. Resident 1 and Resident 2 were in rooms close to each other. This failure had the potential to result in physical injuries to Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 8/25/24, at 5:44 p.m., authored by Licensed Nurse A, indicated, .Resident 1 was yelling in her room when Resident 2 went into the room and slapped Resident 1 on the left cheek. Resident 1 was visibly red on the left cheek following the incident . A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 8/25/24, at 11:35 p.m., authored by Licensed Nurse B indicated, Resident 1 being monitored for emotional distress related to being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that an alleged violation of physical abuse to one of seven sample residents, Resident 1, was reported to the State Survey Agency immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation of physical abuse was made, when Certified Nursing Assistant C witnessed Resident 2 slapped Resident 1 on the left side of her face on 8/25/24, at 3:30 p.m., and Licensed Nurse A reported the incident to the State Survey Agency via voicemail on 8/25/24, at 9:02 p.m., followed by a fax transmitted to the State Survey Agency on 8/25/24, at 9:13 p.m. The physical abuse allegation was reported by Licensed Nurse A to the State Survey Agency more than 5 hours after Certified Nursing Assistant C's allegation was made. This failure had the potential to result in further escalation and recurrence of physical abuse of Resident 1 by Resident 2 pending an investigation and identification of new measures to protect Resident 1 from Resident 2. Findings: A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated 8/25/24, at 5:44 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe and functional environment to three of seven sampled residents (Resident 3, 4, and 5) in room [ROOM NUMBER], when the sliding door and screen door locking mechanisms were broken. This failure had the potential to result in harm to these residents in case of a violent break-in situation or when accidentally left open during extreme weather patterns, jeopardizing their health and safety. Findings: On 7/17/24, at 8:38 a.m., the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) received a complaint that included an allegation that door locks inside one of the resident rooms were broken and not able to be locked. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/3/24, at 2 p.m., with the facility's Maintenance Supervisor in room [ROOM NUMBER], 2, and 3, it was observed that the original sliding door locking mechanisms were broken and not able to lock. It was also observed that the screen door in room [ROOM NUMBER] was not locking because it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure the safety of 1 out of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5), when Resident 4 eloped from the facility and was found .4 miles away by the Police Department. This failure had the potential for all residents at risk of elopement, to be at risk of falls, injury and possible death. Findings: During an observation on 6/11/24, at 8:25 a.m., the front of the facility located at 81 Professional Center Parkway sat on the side of a hill, with a steep inclined driveway up to the front entrance. The facility was located on a street with moderate traffic in the middle of a hill that contained high-density housing, offices and a convenience store. The street began on a frontage road at the base of a steep incline up to where the facility was located. During an observation 6/11/24, at 10:29 a.m. the hallway corridor that ended at the north side of facility, led to the outside courtyard. The metal door that led outside was not locked or alarmed and allowed unsupervised passage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's pharmacy failed to provide 1 resident (Resident 1) in a census of 86 residents with his routine pain medication (Hydromorphone, also known as Dilaudid) timely and failed to ensure nursing staff had access to the Hydromorphone located in the facility's e-kit (container with emergency medication storage). These failures contributed to Resident 1 to missing his Hydromorphone doses for approximately 24 hours on 10/28/2023 and missing his pain medication again multiple times from 12/11/23 through 12/14/23 which in turn: 1) Caused Resident 1 to experience increased pain, 2) Caused Resident 1 to feel suicidal, hopeless, out of control, angry and depressed, 3) Caused Resident 1 to experience symptoms of narcotic withdrawal, and 4) Prevented Physician J from being aware of the ongoing issues related to Resident 1's Hydromorphone delivery and administration and therefore, prevented him from evaluating and addressing the issue.(Online review of the Mayo Clinic website revealed a pain scale provides a standardized means of measuring pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from possible abuse and self-injurious behavior, when: 1. Two injuries of unknown origin, discovered on 1/01/24, were not investigated by the facility, and; 2. Resident 1, who had a history of skin lesions (A region in an organ or tissue which has suffered damage through injury or disease), was not protected from self-injurious behavior, nor were several new skin lesions documented, care planned or receiving any type of treatment at the time of discovery by the DEPARTMENT Surveyor. These findings had the potential to result in abuse and harm, including death from serious skin infections to Resident 1. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Hemiplegia (Severe or complete loss of strength leading to paralysis on one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (Weakness on one side of the body) affecting left side and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Administrator B (Facility ' s previous Administrator) failed to follow-up on an antipsychotic (A medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior and treats symptoms of mental illness) consent form that was needed for Resident 1 to resume his preadmission antipsychotic therapy. This finding had the potential to result in harm, neglect, and inability for Resident 1 to reach his maximum health care potential. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Hemiplegia (Severe or complete loss of strength leading to paralysis on one side of the body) and Hemiparesis (Weakness on one side of the body) affecting his left side and Anxiety Disorder, (Persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities. This ongoing worry and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nursing staffing information was posted in a conspicuous place during a time of the day when visitors were allowed to enter the facility, during one of three visits by the Surveyor (On 12/14/24). This finding had the potential to result in inability for residents, visitors, and staff to review the staffing information, advocate for the residents ' care, and identify issues with staffing numbers, which could have contributed to decreased quality of care. Findings: During an observation on 2/14/24 at 9:30 a.m., the posting that included the nursing staffing information, located in the lobby area of the facility, on top of the receptionist ' s desk, had staffing posting information from the day before, 2/13/24. At that time, there was a lot of activity going on at the facility. More than ten residents were observed in the dining area involved in recreational activities, and staff were busy with their morning work routines. During an interview with Unlicensed Staff D on 2/14/24 at 9:32 a.m., he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were conducted for two or two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). This failure resulted to Resident 1 ' s Representative and Resident 2 not being able to exercise their right to participate with care planning on continuing or changes in care, treatment, and healthcare goals that could affect Resident 1 and Resident 2 ' s quality of care and quality of life. Findings: Resident 1 During an interview with Witness C on 12/20/23 at 1:26 p.m., Witness C stated Resident 1 had no capacity to make healthcare decisions due to Dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). He stated he expected the facility to invite him every scheduled care plan meetings as he was Resident 1 ' s Representative to make healthcare decisions and would not miss any of the care plan meetings if he was invited; however, he stated he was not invited to participate with most of the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to implement timely revision of ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Self Care Performance Deficit Care Plan for one of two residents (Resident 1) when the facility did not update the Care Plan for Resident 1 reflecting the decline in Resident 1 ' s functional status. These failure had the potential for facility staff to provide inadequate care and supervision to ensure Resident 1 ' s health and safety needs. (Reference F689, F686) Findings: During a review of the Face sheet (A one-page summary of important information about a resident) indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to: Diabetes Mellitus (disease that result in too much sugar in the blood); Hypertension (High Blood Pressure); and Neurocognitive Disorder (decreased mental function due to a medical disease other than a psychiatric [relating to mental] illness). During a review of the document titled Post-Fall Review dated 10/21/23 indicated Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to meet nursing professional standards for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when a facility licensed staff provided wound treatment to Resident 1 without a physician ' s order. This failure had a potential risk for Resident 1 of adverse drug reaction. (Reference F686) Findings: During a review of the Progress Note dated 11/22/23 at 7:49 p.m. and concurrent interview with Licensed Staff B on 2/08/24 at 11:14 a.m., the progress note indicated Resident 1 was noted with 4.5 cm x 4.5 cm of non-blanchable redness (skin redness that do not fade when a person presses on them) to sacrococcyx area (pertaining to both the sacrum and coccyx) with an open wound measuring 0.5 cm x 0.7 cm., and was treated with Medihoney (a brand name wound and burn gel). When Licensed Staff B was asked if Resident 1 ' s physician gave the order to treat the wound with medihoney, Licensed Staff B stated yes; however, after review of the Physician ' s Order with Licensed Staff B, she stated there was no order written for medihoney on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to provide necessary services for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. The facility did not perform a rehabilitation screening for Resident 1 after the fall to evaluate any adverse effects from the fall and the potential need for rehabilitation services. 2. The facility waited for eight (8) days to perform a right hip X-ray (a type of medical imaging that creates pictures of the bones and soft tissues) after Resident 1 had complained of right hip pain and waited for another 8 days to obtain an order for weight bearing precaution after Resident 1 was found with right femoral fracture (a break in the thigh bone). These failure resulted to a delayed treatment and could have resulted to a more serious injury when facility staff allowed Resident 1 to bear weight to her right leg during sit to stand activity (the ability to come to a standing position from sitting in a chair, wheelchair, or on the side of the bed) without knowing Resident 1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a Plan of Correction (POC-a document submitted by licensed health care facilities to respond to deficiencies identified in a survey of the facility conducted by state field staff) after they were cited on 4/20/23 for not having replaced or reimbursed several missing items for one of three residents (Resident 4). In this POC, which was approved by the DEPARTMENT 7/20/23, the facility agreed to reimburse Resident 4 for a list of missing items provided by Resident 1 ' s resident representative (Witness AA) but did not do it. This finding resulted in frustration, resentment, and anger to Resident 4 ' s family, which added to the grief of her loss in August of 2023. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Dementia (The loss of cognitive functioning — thinking, remembering, and reasoning — to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to adequately manage one of one resident's (Resident 5) pain control. This failure resulted in Resident 5 suffering unnecessary pain for eight days until the diagnosis of a fracture had been confirmed. Findings: During a review of Resident 5 ' s admission record, dated 3/5/21, indicated Resident 5 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of high blood pressure, osteoporosis (a bone disease when mineral density and bone mass decreases or when the structure and strength of bone chances, leading to increased risk of fracture) and dementia (a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). A review of Resident 5 ' s, Progress Note, dated 10/9/23, indicated (name of company) (mobile x-ray company) had been contacted on 10/8/23 and the order from the doctor was faxed to the company but when (name of company) was contacted by telephone, the person receiving the call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-04 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure radiological services were provided in a timely manner for one of one resident (Resident 5) when a STAT (immediately) x-ray (a form of electromagnetic radiation, which is used to generate images of tissues and structures inside of the body) of the left knee was not completed for eight days. This failure resulted in a delayed diagnosis and treatment causing pain and suffering. Findings: Review of Resident 5 ' s admission record, dated 3/5/21, indicated Resident 5 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of high blood pressure, osteoporosis (a bone disease when mineral density and bone mass decreases or when the structure and strength of bone chances, leading to increase risk of fracture) and dementia (a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). A review of Resident 5 ' s, Progress Note dated 10/8/23, indicated Resident 5 had a redness and swelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat four of ten sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 6, and Resident 8) with respect and dignity when Resident 1 was not ensured access to a call light, assistance with answering phone calls from family, and had to call out/yell and wait for assistance, Resident 2 was left sitting or lying in his urine or feces for prolonged period of time, Resident 6 was left waiting a long time to get cleaned up, and Resident 8 feeling staff in the graveyard shift avoid cleaning him and left him lying in his feces and waiting for the morning to clean him up. These failures caused Resident 1 to feel frustrated, Resident 2 to feel staff did not care, Resident 6 to cry stating she felt like she was in a concentration camp, and Resident 8 stating he felt staff were doing it on purpose, and he felt bad and hurt. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/25/23 at 2:16 p.m., Resident 2 was lying in a low bed gesturing to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment when one of nine air conditioning (AC) units of the facility was not replaced or repaired, and the emergency exit door by Nursing Station 2 and 3 was not repaired for an undisclosed long period of time, and the iron gate at the top of the stairs leading from the emergency exit door was not secured and left accessible to anyone from the driveway in front of the building. These failures exposed residents in at least 6 of 38 rooms (approximately 16 of 82 residents) and staff in the facility to uncomfortably hot environment in the summer and potentially extreme cold conditions this winter that could worsen the frail health conditions of the residents, cause an accident from the door falling or a break-in and harm to residents and staff from intruders through the open gate. Findings: A review of a complaint to the Department dated 10/17/23, alleged four to five AC/heating units in the facility were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system for disposition of controlled substances in sufficient detail when two Licensed Nurses (Licensed Nurse G and Licensed Nurse H) did not know how to properly dispose of unused or wasted narcotic medication. This failure increased the risk for potential misuse and abuse of narcotic medication or could result in water pollution and unintentionally expose of the public to chemical from the medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/26/23, at 4:14 p.m., Licensed Nurse G was observed administering medication to a resident. When asked how she would dispose of a narcotic medication, Licensed Nurse G responded, two licensed nurses signed out the narcotic medication as wasted, crushed the narcotic medication, added water, and disposed of it in the sink. During the interview on 10/26/23, at 4:28 p.m., after acknowledging Licensed Nurse G's response to the question on disposal of narcotic medication, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she needed to gather the nurses and in-service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to practice proper hand hygiene when four of seven Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) (CNA A, CNA B, CNA E, and CNA F) did not offer, encourage, clean or wash residents' hands prior to serving meal trays or before letting residents eat. The failure increased the potential to spread communicable diseases or infection among residents and staff in the facility and further compromise the already frail condition of the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/25/23, at 12:32 p.m., CNA A went into a resident's room and served a resident the meal tray. When asked if he offered to clean the hands of the resident, CNA A stated the CNA assigned to this resident could have done it already. CNA A confirmed he had not offered to clean the resident's hands and acknowledged he should have. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/25/23, at 12:35 p.m., CNA B brought the meal tray to a resident. CNA B was not heard…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report within 2 hours a suspected abuse incident between two residents (Resident 7 and Resident 11). This failure had the potential of placing residents at risk for further abuse, delay the assessment, and evaluation of the involved residents and management of psychosocial or physical injury, delay the investigation to determine the cause and extent of the conflict, or rule out abuse. Findings: A review of a report dated 10/19/23, indicated staff witnessed resident-to-resident abuse but did not report the incident until a day after, leaving the victim and abuser sharing a room. A review of the facility abuse log between 9/23 and 10/23, indicated the incident between Resident 7 and Resident 11 happened on 9/28/23 at 3:27 p.m. A review of Progress Notes (PN) dated 9/28/23, at 3:27 p.m., titled Social Service Note (SSN) indicated, Resident 7 reported to Social Service Staff (SS Staff) that Resident 11 hit her on the neck with a cane. SSN dated 9/29/23 at 1:16 p.m., indicated the report of suspected dependent adult/elder abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure licensed nursing staff followed professional standards of care for 2 of 3 Sampled Residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when Licensed Nurse A (LN A) did not follow manufacturer ' s directions nor facility policy when administering rapid acting insulin (Insulin is a hormone made by the pancreas to control blood sugar; a person who ' s pancreas does not make or release insulin has Diabetes, and may need to take synthetic insulin [insulin medication]). This failure placed Residents 1 and 2 at risk for hypoglycemia, and potential harm, when LN A administered their rapid acting insulin (insulin that begins to lower blood sugar 15 minutes after administration) too early (approximately 20–35 minutes before the lunch trays arrived on the resident ' s hall). (Hypoglycemia, also called low blood sugar, is a fall in blood sugar to an abnormal level; symptoms include headache, tiredness, clumsiness, trouble talking, confusion, loss of consciousness, seizures, or death; hypoglycemia is most commonly caused by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-05-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff demonstrated competency in clinical care and services, when the facility did verify ongoing competency of: 1) Licensed nurse ability to perform accurate blood sugar monitoring; 2) Licensed nurse skill at administering medication to residents; 3) Licensed nurse ability to ensure controlled wasting of narcotic medication; These failures had the potential to cause inappropriate monitoring of blood sugar, medication errors during administration, and not meeting residents' safety and infection control needs. Findings: 1) During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/10/21 at 1:50 p.m., with Staff B, the facility did not have records of staff who received annual in-service and skills test. Staff B stated the facility did not have a DSD (Director of Staff Development). During an interview on 5/10/2021 at 2 p.m., Staff A stated that he is searching for a DSD to hire. During an interview on 5/11/2021 at 11 a.m., Staff R stated that the facility did not have any current in-service or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-05-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing requirements where met, when: 1. The facility did not have a designated Registered Nurse covering for the DON for several days, while the DON was out on medical leave. 2. The facility did not use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, These findings resulted in missed doses of IV (Intravenous) Antibiotic medication for Resident 137 on 5/6/21 and 5/7/21 due to not having a Registered Nurse employed on those dates, and had the potential to result in the inability to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of reach resident. Findings: 1. During an interview on 5/17/21 at 10:00 a.m., STAFF L stated the Director of Nursing (DON) was on sick leave. STAFF L stated the DON's last day working at the facility was 5/05/21. STAFF L confirmed there was no DON or staff covering for DON from 5/05/21 to 5/11/21. During an interview on 5/17/21 at 11:26 a.m., STAFF A,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote residents' respect and dignity to residents when: 1) Resident 141 did not get his meal tray at the same time as everyone else in the dining room. 2) Resident 25 watched other residents eat while he could not eat by mouth. 3) Resident 58 listened to Speech therapist conducted work in the day room. 4) Residents voiced grievance but did not get response from the facility. 5) Residents 2 and 62 had photographs taken while they were sleeping without their awareness or approval. These failures resulted in residents feeling angry, neglected, and disrespected. Findings: 1) During an observation on 5/10/21 at 12:00 p.m., in the dining room, Resident 141 did not receive his meal tray while other residents in front of him were eating. A review of the Dining Meal Schedule revealed, Lunch served in the Dining room at 12 noon. During an observation on 5/10/21 at 12:20 p.m., Resident 141 did not get his lunch tray while and appeared upset, raised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-19 · tag F0572 — patternGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep residents informed of their rights and responsibilities when admission Agreements (A legal contract that states the rights of the residents and responsibilities of both the facility and the residents) were not provided to several residents upon admission to the facility and consents to treatment were not signed. This failure had the potential to result in violation of residents' rights. Findings: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). Resident 23's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 4/15/21 indicated his BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition assessment) score was 13, which indicated his cognition was intact. During an interview on 5/13/21 at 9:59 a.m., Resident 23 stated he never received the facility's admission Agreement. Resident 23 also stated he was never asked to sign any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment to all residents in the facility when: 1) Flying pests were observed in the dining room, conference room, and one resident room 2) Residents were exposed to rodents inside the facility 3) Staff stored cooked meat stored cooked meat for a pet's meal in a drawer inside one resident room. These failures had the potential to result in a decline of residents' psychosocial functioning and resident discomfort. Findings: 1) During an observation on 5/10/2021 at 12 p.m., seven residents eating lunch in the dining room, this surveyor noted two flies, flying over residents. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/10/2021 at 12:30 p.m., Staff B (Infection Preventionist) entered the dining room and sat between two occupied tables. This Surveyor called Staff B's attention to the presence of flies. Staff B stated that she noticed that there were flies in the dining room. During an observation on 5/11/2021 at 11 a.m., Resident 41's room had fresh ripe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for activities for two of six residents (Resident 78 and Resident 72). This failure had the potential to result in deterioration of the residents' mental and physical health, and decreased quality of life. Findings: Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Atrial Fibrillation (Irregular heartbeat) and Personal History of Unspecified Adult Abuse according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). Resident 78's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 3/25/21 indicated her BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition assessment) score was 13, which indicated her cognition was intact. During an observation on 5/12/21 at 9:46 a.m., Resident 78 was observed in a chair, in her room, alone, awake, not engaged in any activities. During a second observation on 5/14/21 at 11:42 a.m., Resident 78 was observed in a chair in her room, alone, awake, not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised and updated for two of six residents (Resident 23 and Resident 41) after suffering falls at the facility. As a result, the residents continued to suffer falls, which could have resulted in serious injuries and harm. Findings: Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, Difficulty in Walking, and Blindness on One Eye, according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). Resident 23's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 4/15/21 indicated his BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition assessment) score was 13, which indicated his cognition was intact. During record review on 5/11/21 at 11:24 a.m., it was noted Resident 23 suffered multiple falls at the facility since the January 1, 2021. First Fall: A Health Status Note dated 1/18/21 at 9:02 pm., indicated, At around 18:45 (6:45 p.m.,) when the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) enter to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were implemented when: 1. A Licensed Nurse (STAFF I) did not inform other Licensed Staff on the floor that she was taking her lunch so they could cover for her during her leave. This failure had the potential to result in inability for other nurses to respond to medical emergencies and needs of the residents in STAFF I's assigned section. 2. Facility staff, including department heads, were observed using their cell phones for personal business during work hours. 3. Facility staff did not sign the MAR to indicate administration of opioid medication for Resident 56 after removing the medication from a pill pack. These failures had the potential to result in neglect and abandonment of residents, inability for staff to timely respond to medical emergencies, and did not ensure the facility maintained control over controlled substances. Findings: 1. Resident 183 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and accident free facility when: 1. The facility stored two unsecured oxygen tanks inside one of 19 resident's (Resident 58) room; 2. Two of six residents (Resident 23 and Resident 41) were not provided adequate care and supervision to prevent them from suffering multiple falls; 3. The facility did not perform a smoking assessment for one of six residents (Resident 5), and allowed Resident 5 to keep his own smoking supplies in his room; 4. Trained, licensed nursing staff did not observe residents who were eating during mealtime. 5. Flammable liquid was not stored in accordance with facility policy. These failures had the potential to cause resident resident harm, and did not ensure a safe environment for delivering care and services. Findings: 1. During observations and initial screening of residents on 5/10/21 at 12:50 p.m., behind the entry door to Resident 58's room were two oxygen tanks. The two oxygen tanks were free…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficent staff available during the night shift to respond to residents' calls for assistance in a timely manner. This failure had the potential to result in poor quality of care and accidents to the residents requiring assistance in the middle of the night. Findings: Resident 23 During resident council interviews on 5/11/21 at 2:00 p.m., Resident 23 stated call lights took a long time to be answered at night, sometimes more than thirty minutes. Resident 23's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 4/15/21 indicated his BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition assessment) score was 13, which indicated his cognition was intact. Resident 51 During an interview on 5/13/21 at 10:46 a.m., Reside 51 stated it took from 25 minutes to an hour for staff to respond to call lights at night. During a second interview on 5/18/21 at 2:17 p.m., Resident 51 stated he had to wait an hour once for staff to respond to call lights, and as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-19 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the daily nursing staffing schedule daily. This failure could have resulted in unavailability of staffing information to residents and visitors for review. Findings: During an observation on 5/17/21 at 9:05 a.m., the posting of the daily nursing staffing schedule could not be located. During an interview on 5/17/21 at 9:17 a.m., STAFF L, Staffing Coordinator, confirmed they did not post the daily nursing schedule. During a concurrent interview and observation on 5/17/21 at 9:41 a.m., STAFF L stated the daily staffing schedule was on a binder in the nursing station, but it was not posted. STAFF L also stated the facility posted the monthly schedule in the wall in one of the wings of the facility. Upon observation, the monthly staffing schedule for April of 2021 was posted, but not the one for May of 2021. STAFF L stated the May staffing schedule had not been posted yet.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one kitchen staff (STAFF Y) performed adequate hand hygiene during meal preparation. This failure had the potential to result in food-borne illness to the residents of the facility. Findings: During an observation on 5/12/21 at 12:18 p.m., STAFF Y, Cook, was observed using disposable gloves during meal preparation. STAFF Y was observed wearing gloves that became soiled with grease and food particles during meal preparation. At one point during the observation, STAFF Y removed his gloves, and donned new gloves, but did not wash his hands in between. This was also observed by the STAFF X, Registered Dietician, who asked him to remove his new gloves and wash his hands. During a second observation on 5/12/21 at 12:30 p.m., cook STAFF Y was observed resting his gloved hands on a soiled counter that contained food particles and stains. Without washing his hands or changing gloves, STAFF Y was observed grabbing bread for residents' sandwiches, and slicing sandwiches, to put them in plates for residents. STAFF…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical documentation was complete and accurate when supplemental oxygen administration was not documented for one resident (Resident 183), and neurological checks (Evaluation of a patient's nervous system) indicated for one resident (Resident 41) where not completed. This failure had the potential to result in inability for staff to respond to the status and needs of the residents, and lack of availability of information to facilitate communication among the interdisciplinary team. Findings: Resident 183 Resident 183 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Heart Failure (A chronic, progressive condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- A chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). A physician order initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) effectively identified and resolved concerns related to: 1. Allegations of abuse and neglect against staff, and; 2. Staff sleeping on duty. These failure had the potential to affect every resident's ability to maintain the highest level of well-being, and had the potential to expose residents to continued physician and/or psychosocial harm if concerns remained unresolved. Findings: During an Interview on 5/18/21 at 2:17 p.m., Administrator stated the facility's QAPI committee developed projects to reconcile employee records, improve staffing of the facility, and improve staff adherence to infection prevention practices and implementation of Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidance. During an Interview on 5/18/21 at 2:17 p.m., Administrator stated that since the QAPI meeting in April 2021, the facility developed logs to track processes such as discharges and abuse reporting. The log to track abuse was based on the many resident-to-resident altercations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices, when: 1. Staff did not practice hand hygiene during mealtime and did not offer residents hand hygiene during mealtime. 2. A Licensed Nurse did not wear a face mask properly, placing the residents at risk for the spread of infections. These failures have the potential for the transmission of infections or causing food borne diseases. Findings: 1. During an observation on 5/10/21 at 11:25 a.m., STAFF I, Licensed Nurse, was observed wearing a surgical facemask that covered her mouth but not her nose. STAFF I was not wearing a face shield at the time. STAFF B, Infection Preventionist, was notified, and she confirmed the finding. STAFF B stated she had told STAFF I on several occasions to ensure her mouth and nose were covered with the facemask, but STAFF I continued to wear it like that (With the nose uncovered). During an interview on 5/10/21 at 11:40 a.m., STAFF I stated she wore her facemask under her nose because it kept falling off. STAFF I was asked if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, when it did not follow policy or take measures recommended by the pest control company to minimize pests. This failure enabled known pest problems to continue and had the potential to expose resident to diseases transmitted by rodents, flies and other insects, leading to unnecessary illness or death. Findings: During an observation on 5/10/21 at 8:30 a.m., a tour of the outdoor patio and outside of the front entrance of the Facility revealed multiple large mousetraps placed near and underneath the building of the facility. During an interview on 5/10/21 at 9:00 a.m., Staff J (Maintenance Supervisor) stated that the Pest Control Company advised to place mousetraps around the facility for safety measures, to prevent rodent entering the facility. Staff J stated that the Pest Control Company placed about 15 mousetraps on the grounds surrounding and underneath the facility. Staff J stated that he had not seen any rodents inside the facility. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six residents (Resident 51) received his scheduled showers twice per week. This failure had the potential to result in discomfort, skin infections and feelings of frustration and helplessness to Resident 51. Findings: Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Obesity and Diseases of the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue (The innermost layer of skin), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). Resident 72's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 2/16/21 indicated his BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition assessment) score was 15, which indicated his cognition was intact. Resident 72's MDS also indicated he required physical help from one person in part of the bathing activity. Resident 72's Nursing Plan of Care for activities of daily living (ADLs), including bathing, indicated, The resident has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit r/t (Related to)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-05-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an on-going activities program for two of six residents (Resident 78 and Resident 72) designed to meet the residents' interests. This failure had the potential to result in deterioration of the residents' mental and physical health, and decreased quality of life. Findings: Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Atrial Fibrillation (Irregular heartbeat) and Personal History of Unspecified Adult Abuse according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). Resident 78's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 3/25/21 indicated her BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition assessment) score was 13, which indicated her cognition was intact. During an observation on 5/12/21 at 9:46 a.m., Resident 78 was observed in a chair, in her room, alone, awake, not engaged in any activities. During a second observation on 5/14/21 at 11:42 a.m., Resident 78 was observed in a chair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility did not determine the indication for one of five residents (Resident 140) to continue using a urinary catheter (a tube to drain the urine from one's bladder.) This failure resulted in Resident 140 missing a follow up Medical appointment. In addition, there is potential for the resident to develop a urinary tract infection from the external tube. Findings: During observations and initial screening of residents on 5/10/21 at 12:20 p.m., Resident 140 was seen in bed with a urinary catheter bag resting on the floor. During an observation and concurrent interview on 5/12/21 at 3:00 p.m., Resident 140's urinary catheter bag was hanging from the bedside and in a blue cloth bag. Resident 140 did not know why he had a urinary catheter. Review of Resident 140's Physician Orders dated 4/6/21, contained orders for Resident 140 to have a urinary catheter with reason of Diagnosis (none listed) Orders for the catheter were also written. Resident 140's medical diagnosis included Respiratory failure, Alcohol abuse, Emphysema…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the failed to store and label medication appropriately, when the facility: 1) Did not use the appropriate temperature controls when storing medication. 2) Stored expired medication with medication intended for resident use 3) Stored medication in containers with an inappropriate labels These failures had the potential to result in administration of contaminated or unstable medication as well as use of medication beyond the medication's date of expiration, which could cause resident harm. Findings: 1 ) During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review inside one of two medication storage rooms in the facility, on [DATE] at 10:30 a.m., Staff R (acting Director of Nurses) was present. Prevnar 13 10x5 was stored under room temperature. The label for Prevnar 13 10x5 indicated to refrigerate the medication. Staff R stated the medication should have been refrigerated and then removed the medication from stock. 2) During a concurrent observation, interview,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-05-01 · tag F0800 — widespreadProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that met daily nutritional and special dietary needs when: 1. Diet orders and considerations were not accurately transcribed to kitchen staff; 2. There was insufficient dietary management and oversight as of 3/18/19; 3. Food supply was not sufficient to prepare the menu as approved by the Registered Dietician; 4. The menu was not followed for 2 menu types; 5. Therapeutic diet orders were not followed; 6. Recipes were not followed; 7. Resident preferences were not honored; and 8. Substitutions were not documented and not nutritionally equal. These failures resulted in nutrition services not meeting the needs for all 87 residents, and had the potential to result in impaired nutritional status for at risk residents. Impaired nutrition may be associated with an increased risk of mortality and other negative outcomes, such as impairment of anticipated wound healing, decline in function, fluid and electrolyte imbalance/dehydration, and unplanned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-05-01 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the management and supervision of nutritional services which had the potential for dietary deficient practices to go unchecked and unresolved. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour, on 4/23/19, at 8:45 a.m., observed 3 staff working in the kitchen. Tour was conducted without staff involvement. When asked if the Dietary Manager (DM) was in the building, all three stated no and continued to work. During a review of the Active Employee List, dated 4/23/19, provided by the Administrator, indicated the facility did not have a Dietary Manager. During an interview, with the consultant Registered Dietician (RD), on 4/24/19, at 12:48 p.m., she stated every month she performed a kitchen sanitation check. Daily work included resident assessments, nutritional recommendations for at risk residents, resident weight loss monitoring, interdisciplinary team meetings, facility committee meetings, and day to day kitchen support. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-05-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, which resulted in subpar dining experiences for all 87 residents in the facility. Findings: During kitchen observations, from 4/22/19-4/30/19, dietary staff were observed performing duties that did not ensure: menus and nutritional adequacy, resident preferences allergies and substitutions, therapeutic diets, and food service safety. Cooks A and B were observed not following recipes when pureeing food. Cooks A and B did not modify texture according to the altered texture manual. An entire lunch meal was called out by dietary aides and plated by cooks without the diet type being honored. The Registered Dietitian (RD) was present during observation. When asked how the residents requiring lower sodium, reduced carbohydrate, or low fat diets were identified [NAME] A stated she did not understand. the RD stated she did not realize no diet types were called out. The RD reviewed the spreadsheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures when: 1. Dinnerware was not properly sanitized during the dish washing process, and 2. Potentially Hazardous Food (PHF) was prepared without verifying and/or documenting proper final internal cooking temperature had been reached and maintained for 15 seconds, 3. Nutritional supplements, located on the Nursing Medication Administration carts, were held for extended amounts of time without monitoring for safe temperature, 4. Dietary staff did not have hair consistently restrained, 5. Dietary staff did not consistently wear aprons or change aprons to prevent cross contamination, 6. One cardboard box of red potatoes, located in the dry storage room, was half full of potatoes that were squishy to the touch and had a white fuzzy substance growing on them. 7. Dietary cooks did not consistently perform hand hygiene and change gloves to prevent cross…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-05-01 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QPIA) had effective oversight of the following: 1. Food and Nutrition Services (Refer to 800, 801, 802, 803, 806, 808, and 812), and 2. Antibiotic Stewardship (Refer to 881). This failure had the potential to negatively affect the health and well-being of all the residents in the facility. Findings: During an interview with the administrator on 4/30/19 at 3:45 PM, he stated the Department Heads met monthly for QAPI. He stated that problems were identified by department heads and discussed at QAPI. The facility's Performance Improvement Goals were to have the 5 Star quality measures show improvement. When asked if there was a Performance Improvement project for Infection control or Antibiotic Stewardship, he stated that the Director of Staff Development would need to get one going. When asked if there was a Performance Improvement project for Food and Nutritional services, he stated the facility did not have a Performance improvement project. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-05-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective Antibiotic stewardship program was present and functioning, including promoting the appropriate use of antibiotics and consistent monitoring of antibiotic use to improve resident outcomes for two (Resident 39 and 59) out of 19 sampled residents and reduction of antibiotic resistance, according to facility policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential for inappropriate use of antibiotics resulting in adverse events associated with antibiotic use and subsequent antibiotic resistance (drugs designed to kill bacteria are no longer effective and bacteria are able to multiply. Findings: During a concurrent interview and document review with Director of Staff Development on 4/30/19 at 11:03 a.m., she stated Resident 39 had been diagnosed with a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) as identified from an Infection Prevention and Control Surveillance Log (form). Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated, she had to find the supporting documentation of how Resident 39 was diagnosed with a UTI and why she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-05-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility was only discussing Advance Directives on admission but was not discussing Advance Directives with residents during care conferences or when changes occurred. This was checked for 3 of 3 long term residents, (Residents 26, 37 and 38.) This had the potential for Resident's advanced care planning decisions regarding their health care and treatment options not being honored. Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 37, The Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatments (POLST) dated [DATE] indicated Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was to be performed. The California POLST form, Section D has boxes to mark if Advance Directives are available and reviewed, Not available, or no Advance Directives. Resident 37's POLST did not have any box marked to indicate if he had Advanced Directives. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 38, The POLST dated [DATE] indicated Do not attempt resuscitation. Resident 37's POLST did not have any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person centered care plan for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 42) with regard to nutrition and weight loss. This failure had the potential for further weigh loss, which could negatively impact Resident 42's health. Findings: During an observation on 4/23/19 at 9:42 a.m., Resident 42 was in her room with a breakfast tray on her bedside table uneaten. Resident 42 was asked if she was hungry and she did not answer with discernable language. A review of Resident 42's admission Record indicated she was admitted the facility on 10/20/18 with a history of Dementia (a general term used to describe a group of symptoms associated with a decline in memory, other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities), high blood pressure, muscle weakness causing an unsteady walking and low thyroid (a gland in the body that regulates metabolism, resulting in potentially feeling tired). A review of Resident 42's admission Assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS), a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that person centered care plans were revised for 1 resident, Resident 38. This failure had the potential for Resident 38 to be injured by a fall and suffer increased deformity form a contracture of the left wrist. Other residents were at risk of injury due to Resident 38's unpleasant behavior. Findings: During an observation on 4/22/19 at 10 AM, in Resident 38's room, her wheelchair was parked between the beds, and she was motioning for help from the roommate. Resident 38's roommate put on the call bell. After 5 minutes a CNA answered the call light and stated I do not know what we do for [Resident 38], she is not my resident. During an observation on 4/22/19 at 12:10 PM in the dining room, Resident 38 was at the table for lunch. She was pulling on the tablecloth, and another resident had to call out for staff to see her. A few minutes later she was observed to throw a fork and knife at the other resident's head. She also was seen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary Activities of Daily Living and documentation for showers for 2 out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 2 and 242). This failure resulted in Resident 2 not receiving her showers twice weekly and Resident 242 having disheveled appearance. Findings: During an interview with Resident 2 on 4/23/19 at 3:31 p.m., she stated she was not getting her twice weekly showers. Resident 2 stated some of the reasons for her not getting her weekly showers included: not enough staff due to someone calling in sick, too busy and new staff not knowing how to take care of her. Resident 2 stated she did not walk very well and most used a wheelchair to get around due to legs being weak and not being able to see. A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of high blood pressure, generalized muscle weakness and adult failure to thrive (syndrome of weight loss and depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 5 residents who had indwelling catheters (Resident 57), which resulted in Resident 57 contracting an infection. Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 57, the admission Report, dated 4/23/19, indicated Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. At the time of admission, Resident 57 had active medical diagnoses of; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (a progressive disease affecting nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, the main symptom is muscle weakness, and there is no cure), respiratory failure (condition in which your blood doesn't have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), and quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs). The report further indicated Resident 57 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. Resident 57 was able to make his needs known, and answered questions appropriately.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-05-01 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — patternProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During an observation and concurrent interview with Resident 90, on 4/23/19, at 12:08 p.m., observed colostomy bag attached to the resident's abdomen. Neither the bag or attachment site was dated. Resident 90 confirmed she had the colostomy prior to admission. Resident 90 confirmed staff were emptying the colostomy bag. Resident 90 did not recall any staff assessing the skin or the colostomy site. Resident 90 stated she did not know how to answer the question because she did not know what staff did or did not do regarding her colostomy. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 90, the admission Report, dated 4/23/19, indicated Resident 90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. At the time of admission, Resident 90 had active medical diagnoses of; partial intestinal obstruction, colostomy, pneumonia (a lung inflammation caused by bacterial or viral infection, in which the air sacs fill with pus and may become solid), and septic shock (a bacterial infection elsewhere in the body, such as the lungs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide ostomy care to meet the professional standards of 1 (Resident 35) out of 19 sampled residents. This failure had the potential of the inappropriate ostomy care resulting in harm for those residents with an ostomy. Findings: During an interview with Resident 35 on 4/23/19 at 10:46 a.m., he indicated by showing his colostomy pouch (a bag that contains the excrement emptying out of the colon through a surgical opening from the colon (colostomy) to the abdominal wall that empties into a bag) was full and that it needed to be emptied so he put on his call light on. CNA Q (Certified Nursing Assistant Q) stated he did not know how to empty the colostomy bag and exited to find someone who could. CNA O entered Resident 35's room at 10:55 a.m. and stated she had not been trained on how to empty the colostomy bag and exited to find the nurse who could do it. Assistant Director of Nurses entered Resident 35's room at 11:05 a.m. and stated she could empty the colostomy bag. CNA O assisted the Assistant Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-05-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus met the individual needs of residents when; 1. Menus were not followed, 2. Alternate entree items were not nutritionally equivalent to the original entree offered, 3. And menus were not culturally appropriate for 2 unsampled residents (Resident 5 and 243). These failures resulted in multiple residents expressing frustration that the food was redundant, disappointing, and there was nothing acceptable provided for some residents to eat. Findings: 1. During an interview with Resident 75 on 4/22/19, at 9:39 a.m., she stated she had diabetes and several food allergies. Resident 75 felt her meals were always high in carbohydrates and sweets. Resident 75 also stated she always had to check what they were serving her because on several occasions she was served something she was allergic to. She said residents that had the ability to go to the kitchen door and knock could get an egg salad sandwich. Resident 75 was a long term resident at the facility for the past 3 years, she was alert and oriented and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-05-01 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor resident preferences when: 1. 2 residents (Resident 10 and Resident 75) received a food item they were allergic too. This failure could have potentially led to food illness and an allergic reaction requiring medical intervention; 2. 3 residents (Resident 54, 76, and 77), with a documented dislike of gravy, were served gravy, which resulted in residents not being satisfied with their meal; 3. 4 residents (Resident 57, Resident 75, Resident 80, Resident 35) and anonymous members of the resident council with a preference for fresh fruit, were given canned fruit; which resulted in residents feeling like they had no control over their food choices. Findings: 1. During a dining observation on 4/22/19, at 16:00 p.m., Resident 10 was eating dinner which consisted of beef stew, a roll, a cup of vanilla ice cream, and a glass of water. Review of the resident's tray card revealed, the resident was allergic to milk. Review of the clinical record for Resident 10, on 4/22/19, indicated the resident had allergies to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-05-01 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician prescribed therapeutic diet orders were followed when: 1. Resident 27, that required food to be a pureed texture, was given a regular meal, 2. 7 unsampled residents that required food to be a mechanical soft texture were given regular texture grilled cheese sandwiches for lunch, 3. 4 unsampled residents that required food to be a mechanical soft texture were given regular texture corn bread with their lunch meal, 4. And 2 residents (Resident 61 and 86), that required food to be a mechanical soft texture were given regular texture grilled cheese sandwiches for dinner. Failure to follow food texture requirements had the potential for serious harm, injury, or death as a result of residents choking on food they could not safely swallow. Findings: 1. During an observation on 4/22/19 at 12:10 PM in the dining room, Resident 27 was served a lunch tray with regular textured food. Resident 27 began to eat right away. At 12:15 p.m. an unlicensed staff person removed his tray and replaced it with a tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a homelike and safe environment when the paving just off of the buildings wall in the Back Patio with the Smoking Area was moist with discolored brown and green. This was concerning to one resident, Resident 39. This failure could have resulted in growing mold and a slipping hazard to any of the ambulatory residents. Findings: During an interview and concurrent observation on 4/23/19 at 1:42 PM, Resident 39 voiced concerns about seeing mold within the facility and outside on the back patio. While walking with the resident she pointed out the 2 wet areas of the pavement that were green and brown and could possibly be the source of the mold. She stated that it should be cleaned up. During an interview on 4/24/19 at 11:35 AM, Maintenance Director was shown the wet brown and green Pavement on the back patio. He stated it was not mold. He stated that the air conditioner was on the roof and moisture from the air conditioner was directed down the 2 drainage pipes on the back of the building, leaving the moisture there on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-01 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed which included the dental status and mouth constrictors for 1 out of 19 sampled residents, (Resident 35). This failure had the potential for development or worsening of the limitation of the mouth opening and not being able to use dentures. Findings: During an interview and observation on 4/23/19 at 2:54 p.m., Resident 35 was observed to not have teeth in his mouth and was asked where his dentures were or if he had dentures. Resident 35 stated he had dentures and motioned to the nightstand next to his bed. Resident 35 stated he could not wear the dentures because they did not fit in his mouth. A review of the Resident 35's admission Record on 4/24/19 at 0930 a.m., indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of a colostomy (a surgical operation which a piece of the colon (bowel) is diverted to an opening in the abdomen so as to bypass the portion of the bowel that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standard and practice for 1 out of 19 sampled residents (Resident 35). This failure could have resulted in skin breakdown. Findings: During an interview and observation with Resident 35 on 4/23/19 at 10:08 a.m., he was observed to be a tall man over 6 feet and sitting in a wheelchair. Resident 35 stated he had a sore on his bottom and it hurt, especially when they cleaned him. Resident 35 stated he could not walk and had to be lifted out of bed and into his wheelchair by using a machine. A review of the Resident 35's admission Record on 4/24/19 at 0930 a.m., indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of a colostomy (a surgical operation which a piece of the colon (bowel) is diverted to an opening in the abdomen so as to bypass the portion of the bowel that was damaged and stool excreted through the opening, into a bag rather than the rectum), thrombosis (a blood clot which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$148,455 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $79,560 — penalty dated 2025-07-08
- $61,204 — penalty dated 2024-01-04
- $2,447 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
- $5,244 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRESCENT FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/19/2006 |
| BERING PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 6% | since 02/01/2007 |
| JENMAX ENTERPRISES LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 23% | since 02/01/2007 |
| JK-CSH JV LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 12% | since 11/01/2006 |
| MANHATTAN FIVE PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 11/01/2006 |
| WIN WIN ENTERPRISES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 35% | since 02/01/2007 |
| BH ALLIANCE | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 11/01/2006 |
| THE JACOB WINTNER TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 11/01/2006 |
| THE WINTNER LIVING TRUST DATED 7/08/1992 | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 02/01/2007 |
| WINTNER, JACOB | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2007 |
| BRETSCH, GREGORY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/25/2019 |
| FOREMAN, NICOLE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/08/2024 |
| CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2014 |
| BUTENKO, JULIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/24/2023 |
| CAPELA, HEIDI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/03/2023 |
| COPP, NOREEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/14/2025 |
| HASSELL, LANCE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/25/2022 |
| LUTZ, LINDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2012 |
| SALAZAR, PAULINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/14/2020 |
| SMEDRA, IRA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2007 |
| 81 PROFESSIONAL CENTER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/15/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555214. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.