No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

West Covina Healthcare Center

850 S. Sunkist Ave., West Covina, CA 91790 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 97 certified beds · (626) 962-3368 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 962-3368 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609) — most recent Dec 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$78,978 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $78,978 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-28)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
741 Orange Ave · (626) 899-4573 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
140 N Orange Ave STE#103 · (626) 251-1630 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3250 Big Dalton Ave · (626) 404-4088 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1615 W Merced Ave · (714) 697-2783 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2133 N Garvey Ave W · (626) 289-6772

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.2%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.2%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.5%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.7%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.5%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.5%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.5%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.852.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.671.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

34.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
43.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 43.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 57% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF34.7%CMS range 24.1–45.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.5%CMS range 8.5–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge43.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.8–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.51
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.01
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
40.4%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 89.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-05)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-03)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-03-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from significant medication error (medication error which causes the resident discomfort or jeopardizes the resident health and safety) by failing to: 1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 administered fluticasone furoate suspension (Flonase- nasal [nose] spray medication used to treat nasal congestion, sneezing, and runny nose caused by seasonal allergies [body's reaction to normally harmless substances]) instead of Narcan nasal liquid (nasal spray medication used to rapidly reverse the effects of opioid [class of drugs used to treat moderate to severe pain] overdose) to Resident 1 on 3/14/2024 at 7:00 pm. 2. Ensure LVN 1 checked Resident 1's Narcan nasal liquid medication label three times and verified that it was the right medication, right dosage, and right time before administering the medication to Resident 1 as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Administering Medications. As a result, on 3/17/2024 at 7:00 pm, immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident-centered comprehensive care plan to prevent a fall (move downward, typically rapidly and freely without control, from a higher to a lower level) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 provided two-person physical assistance (help from two person) when CNA 1 turned Resident 1 to one side while bathing Resident 1 on the bed as indicated in Resident 1's Care Plan titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Self-Care Deficits, initiated on 10/6/2023, and the facility's policies and procedures titled, Fall and Fall Risk, Managing, and Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered. As a result, on 12/12/2023 at 10:30 AM, Resident 1 fell from Resident 1's bed to the floor. Resident 1 sustained a displaced fracture (bone breaks into two or more pieces and move out of alignment) at the neck of the right subcapital femur (neck of the thighbone). Resident 1 was transferred and admitted to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent the development of pressure ulcers/pressure injuries (PU/PI- refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 22), who was assessed as high risk for developing pressure ulcers, by failing to: 1. Assess Resident 22's skin condition on the buttocks (bottom), coccyx (tail bone), sacral (a triangular shape bone at the bottom of the spine) area, and feet for redness or open sores (injuries that involve a break in the skin and leave the internal tissue exposed) during resident care as indicated in Resident 22's care plan on prevention of pressure ulcer/pressure injury, and the facility's Policy and Procedures titled, Prevention of Pressure Injuries. 2. Float (raise) Resident 22's bilateral (both) heels with pillow while the resident was in bed and during turning and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for Resident 1's pain in the left shoulder. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 receiving delayed, inadequate and/or inappropriate care and treatment and to not maintaining Resident 1's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 5/8/2026, the AR indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The AR indicated Resident 1's diagnoses included morbid obesity (a chronic disease in which a person weighs 100 pounds or more over his/her ideal body weight), chronic pain syndrome (a condition where persistent pain lasts for more than 3 to 6 months), and spinal stenosis (the narrowing of the tunnel in a person's spine that contains the spinal cord and nerves). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 3/3/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Release of Information, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure violated the rights of Resident 1's responsible party (RP- a relative or friend who handles the patient's finances and helps with medical decisions) to obtain a copy of Resident 1's medical records within the time frame indicated in the facility's P&P on release of medical records. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral ischemia (blood flow to the brain was blocked or reduced) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). The AR indicated Resident 1's daughter was Resident 1's RP. The AR indicated Resident 1 was discharged on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate neurological assessment (a check of how well the brain, nerves, and muscles work often performed after a suspected head injury) for two of eight sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) after a resident-to-resident physical altercation (a fight or struggle where people used physical force, contact, or aggression against each other) that involved allegations of unwitnessed head injuries on 12/20/2025. These failures had the potential to compromise Residents 1's and Resident 2's health and safety.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control), and metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance in the body). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a specific and person - centered care plans for two of two sampled residents (Resident 73 and Resident 99). These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 73 and Resident 99 to not receive appropriate care, treatment, and/or services related to their needs.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 73's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 73 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 73 was readmitted with diagnoses that included Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (a group of bacteria that were resistant to powerful antibiotics called carbapenems, making infections [harmful germs entered and grew in the body] hard to treat) and gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) status. During a review of Resident 73's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food storage and handling practices by failing to label and discard expired food items stored in the facility's kitchen and residents' refrigerator. The facility failed to ensure:1.The kitchen staff removed expired food items from the kitchen refrigerator: a total of five [5] individually packaged peanut butter and jelly (PBJ) half sandwiches inside a white plastic container and a pack of flour tortillas.2. The facility staff removed the following expired food items from the residents' refrigerator:- A Jumbo oven roasted chicken,- A container with yellow liquid inside,- A container covered with foil paper,- A brown paper bag with multiple food items inside,- A plastic bag with three (3) ice cream bars,- A fast-food meal container with leftover food,- A bag of corn tortillas,- A bag of grated Parmesan cheese. 3. To label resident's personal food items inside the residents' refrigerator with the resident's name or room number including the date received and the expiration date. This deficient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection (harmful germs entered and grew in the body) control measures for two of two sampled residents (Residents 73 and Resident 103) by failing to: a. Rinse off the syringe used for administering gastrostomy-tube (G-tube, a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly into the stomach. It is commonly used for people with swallowing problems) medication for Resident 73. b. Follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, a resident-centered and activity-based approach for preventing multidrug resistant organism [MDRO, microorganisms that are resistant to multiple antibiotics, making them difficult to treat and control]) during Resident 103's linen change when the facility staff did not wear the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, an equipment worn to minimize exposure to illnesses). These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination (the process by which bacteria were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain written informed consent for one of five sampled residents (Resident 4) for the use of psychotropic (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) medication. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 4 not to receive adequate or sufficient information regarding psychotropic medications necessary to make an informed health care decision.Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow), depression (a feeling of severe sadness or hopelessness) and anxiety (emotion characterized by an unpleasant state of inner turmoil). During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 1/21/2025, the MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Advance Directive (AD, a written instruction, recognized under State law relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated [lacking the ability to meet essential requirements for physical health, safety, or self-care]) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 46) was readily accessible in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Advance Directives. This failure had the potential for facility staff to provide medical treatment and services against the resident's will. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's admission Record (AR) the AR indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow) and difficulty in walking. During a review of Resident 46's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 11/26/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 4's target behavior was monitored for the use Lexapro (antidepressant - antidepressant - a medication that change the way the brain uses certain chemicals to regulate mood and behavior) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 4) as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Psychotropic Medication Use. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which may result in significant adverse (harmful) consequences to Resident 4. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow), depression (a feeling of severe sadness or hopelessness) and anxiety (emotion characterized by an unpleasant state of inner turmoil). During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) was accurately coded for surgical wound for one of one sampled resident (Resident 99). This failure had the potential to place Resident 99 at risk of not receiving necessary care services. Findings: During a review of Resident 99's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spine that could cause pain, numbness, or weakness) and infection (harmful germs entered and grew in the body) on the surgical site. During a review of Resident 99's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 9/8/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 99 had clear speech, had the ability to understand and make self-understood. The MDS indicated Resident 99 had intact cognitive skills for daily decision making (ability to think and reason). The MDS indicated Resident 99 required partial assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sample resident (Resident 4) had a physician's order for the use of oxygen (a medical treatment used to help a person to breathe more easily) at two and a half liters per minute through nasal cannula (a medical device used for oxygen therapy). This failure had the potential to place Resident 4 at risk for complications associated with oxygen therapy. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow), depression (a feeling of severe sadness or hopelessness), anxiety (emotion characterized by an unpleasant state of inner turmoil), and gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD, a chronic digestive disorder where stomach acid or contents leak back into the esophagus, causing symptoms like heartburn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its protocol for antibiotic (a substance used to kill bacteria and to treat infections) use for one of one sampled resident (Resident 36), who had received and was receiving antibiotics from 12/2/2025. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 36 to develop antibiotic resistance and to receive antibiotics without justification. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 36 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow) and depressive disorder (persistent feelings of sadness and worthlessness and a lack of desire to engage in formerly pleasurable activities). During a review of Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 11/4/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 36 had intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff response/answer to Residents' call lights in a timely manor for three of three sampled Residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3).These deficient practice violated Residents 1, 2 and 3's rights, delayed in care and services and had the potential to affect Residents 1, 2, and 3's health.Findings:a) During a review Resident 1's, admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Morbid (Severe) Obesity, Hemiplegia (partial paralysis) and Hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move on one side of the body), and Neuromuscular Dysfunction (muscle weakness due to lack of nerve function) of Bladder.During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 7/1/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognition (ability to understand) was normal. Resident 1 was dependent on staff for person hygiene before and after urinating or having a bowel movement and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, by failing to report an alleged verbal abuse to the facility's Abuse Coordinator, California Department of Public Health (CDPH), the Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individual's complaints and assists in resolution of concerns), and the local law enforcement immediately and within 2 hours on 12/19/2024 for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 allegedly called Resident 1 derogatory words. This failure had the potential to subject Resident 1 to potential further abuse from Resident 2. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure) and hypothyroidism (thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormones in the body). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for two of two sampled residents (Residents 29 and 80) by failing to ensure the resident's call lights (an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a patient when in need) were within reach and appropriate to the resident's physical ability. These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 29 and 80 not to receive necessary care or delayed services to meet their needs. Findings: a. During a review of Resident's 29 admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD, a slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs) and osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by gradual loss of cartilage). During a review of Resident 29's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 9/5/2024, the MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's Advance Directive (AD, a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) was discussed, written information was provided to the residents and/or responsible parties and current copy was in the medical chart for three of three sampled residents (Residents 12, 54 and 78) consistent with the facility's policy and procedure on advance directives. These failures had the potential for facility staff to provide medical treatment and services against the resident's will. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 12's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 12 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and asthma (a condition in which a person's airways become inflamed, narrow and swollen, which makes it difficult to breathe). During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for gastrostomy tube (GT, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) site as ordered by the physician and as indicated in the plan of care for two of two sampled residents (Residents 45 and 54). These failures had the potential for complications related to tube feedings for Residents 45 and 54. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 45's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 45 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations), depression (low mood or loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long period of time) and gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach). During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to attempt the use of appropriate alternatives to grab bars before its installation for two of two sampled residents (Residents 35 and 14). These deficient practices placed Residents 35 and 14 at risk for entrapment and injury from the use of bedrails. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 35's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 35 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg and trunk on the same side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), and depression (loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long period of time). During a review of Resident 35's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 7/30/24, the MDS indicated Resident 35 had intact cognition (ability to understand). The MDS indicated Resident 35 was dependent (helper did all of the effort, resident did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a specific and individualized person-centered care plan to meet the resident's needs for two of two sampled residents (Residents 45 and 55). a. A care plan was not developed for Resident 45 with dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). b. A care plan was not developed for Resident 55 for the use of black box medications - Furosemide (water pill that treats fluid retention) and Tylenol #3 with Codeine 3 (a combination narcotic drug that is used to relieve mild to moderate pain). These failures had the potential to result in inconsistent implementation of the care to Residents 45 and 55. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 45's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 45 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), anxiety (intense, excessive, and persistent worry and fear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate care with hospice (compassionate care for people near the end of life) provider for one of two sampled residents (Resident 34) by failing to ensure the Hospice Registered Nurse (HRN) visited Resident 34 on 9/19/24, 9/23/24 and 9/30/24, as scheduled. This deficient practice placed Resident 34 at risk of not receiving appropriate care in a timely manner. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 6/28/24, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and heart failure (also known as congestive heart failure [CHF], is a condition that develops when the heart doesn't pump enough blood for body needs). During a review of Resident 34's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 6/28/24, the POS indicated an order for Hospice 1 for diagnosis of CHF. During an observation on 9/30/24 at 10:46 a.m., Resident 34 was sitting in the wheelchair watching television in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote healing and prevent development of pressure ulcer/injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 14) by failing to ensure Resident 14 was not lying on the site of the pressure ulcer and was repositioned every two hours while in bed. This deficient practice placed Resident 14 at risk for further skin breakdown, prevent healing of the wound and/or worsen the pressure ulcer. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 2/22/23, with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and heart failure (also known as congestive heart failure [CHF], is a condition that develops when the heart doesn't pump enough blood for body needs). During a review of Resident 14's Wound Management Assessment (WMA) dated 2/22/23, the WMA indicated Resident 14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure one of one sampled resident (Resident 185) received care and service for parenteral antibiotic (a drug used to treat infections caused by bacteria and other microorganisms) consistent with professional standards of practice. The PICC line dressing was not labeled with date indicating when the dressing was applied. This failure had the potential to result in infection to the resident and worsen the resident's health condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 185's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 185 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 185's Physician Order Summary Report (POSR) dated 9/20/2024, the POSR indicated the physician ordered for licensed staff to change Resident 185's PICC line dressing on day shift every Friday. During a review of Resident 185's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services for one of one sampled resident (Resident 34) on oxygen therapy (treatment that provides supplemental, or extra oxygen) consistent with professional standards of practice, by failing to follow the physician's order to provide two liters of oxygen through nasal cannula (a flexible soft tube that delivers extra oxygen through a tube and into the nose) to Resident 34. This deficient practice placed Resident 34 at risk for difficulty of breathing and respiratory complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 6/28/24, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and heart failure (also known as congestive heart failure [CHF], is a condition that develops when the heart doesn't pump enough blood for body needs). During a review of Resident 34's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 6/28/24, the POS indicated an order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform post (after) hemodialysis (HD, a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed to function) assessment for one of two sampled residents on HD (Resident 186). This failure had the potential to placed Resident 186 at risk for complications from the hemodialysis site. Findings: During a review of Resident 186's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD, irreversible kidney failure), dependence on renal dialysis (HD) and hypotension (low blood pressure). During a review of Resident 24's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 9/25/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 186 had clear speech, usually understood others, and made self-understood. Resident 186 required substantial/maximal (helper does more than half the effort) assistance for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep an electric fan (a powered machine used to create a flow of air to cool and ventilate rooms and control humidity) in a safe and sanitary condition for one of one sampled resident (Resident 12). This failure had the potential to affect the resident's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 12 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and asthma (a condition in which a person's airways become inflamed, narrow and swollen). During a review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 8/6/2024, the MDS indicated, Resident 12 had intact cognition (ability to understand) and required substantial/maximal assistance (helper did more than half the effort) with oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services as indicated in the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status and Goals and Objectives, Care Plans for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Ensure assigned Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) assessed, monitored, and documented Resident 1's left cheek discoloration as a change of condition (COC - clinical change from a resident's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional status) in Resident 1's clinical record. 2. Ensure assigned LVNs developed a care plan (CP - a formal process that outlines the goals, objectives, and evaluation of the nursing care provided for a patient) regarding Resident 1's left cheek discoloration. 3. Ensure assigned LVNs notified Resident 1's physician regarding Resident 1's left cheek discoloration. These deficient practices had the potential for a delay of care and services to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure storage of medications for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) as indicated in the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Self-Administration of Medications, and Medication Labeling and Storage. This deficient practice had the potential for other residents and unauthorized persons to access Resident 2's medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility admitted Resident 2 on 11/22/2021, with diagnoses of hypothyroidism (a condition where the thyroid [a gland that regulates growth and metabolism] does not create and release enough thyroid hormone in the bloodstream), essential (primary) hypertension (a form of high blood pressure that is linked to genetics, poor diet, lack of exercise, and obesity), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (characterized by high levels of blood sugar in the blood). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 5/21/2024, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for two of three sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the delay of care for Residents 2 and 3 when Residents 2 and 3 were unable to reach their call lights to call staff for assistance. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 2 on 10/3/2023, and most recently admitted the resident on 12/19/2023, with diagnoses of fracture of right femur (a break in the thighbone), muscle weakness, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 3/19/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 2 was usually understood by others and had the ability to usually understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 2 was dependent (helper did all the effort) on staff for toileting hygiene, lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for the use of an antipsychotic medication (medication used to treat psychotic [having severe mental illness] disorders]) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive the type of care and services necessary for the use of an antipsychotic medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/7/2018 with diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (plaque buildup in the wall of the arteries that supply blood to the heart) without angina pectoris (chest pain or discomfort), heart failure (when the heart cannot pump enough blood) and dementia (the loss of the ability to think, remember, and reason to levels that affect daily life and activities). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 4/30/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by: 1. Failing to attempt to provide non-pharmacological interventions (referring to treatments that do not involve the use of medications) before starting an antipsychotic (a medication used to treat psychotic [having severe mental illness] disorders) medication. 2. Failing to provide a psychiatric evaluation (a clinical assessment of an individual ' s mental state) for the use of the antipsychotic medication. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the use of an unnecessary medication for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/7/2018 with diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery (plaque buildup in the wall of the arteries that supply blood to the heart) without angina pectoris (chest pain or discomfort), heart failure (when the heart cannot pump enough blood)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all nursing staff had the appropriate skills and competencies (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics an individual needed to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully) necessary to provide nursing care safely to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, and Administering Medication by failing to: Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 had demonstrated the skills and proper techniques necessary to care for Resident 1 with regards to medication management and/or medication administration. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 receiving an incorrect medication which caused Resident 1 to experience chest pain, burning sensation of Resident 1's body, and Resident 1 felt like Resident 1 was dying. Resident 1 was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1 on 3/14/2024 at 7:30 pm for further evaluation and was treated for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurately documented medical record for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 documented the administration of Narcan nasal liquid (Naloxone Hydrochloride [HCl]- nasal [nose] spray medication used to rapidly reverse the effects of opioid [class of drugs used to treat moderate to severe pain] overdose) instead of fluticasone furoate suspension (Flonase- nasal spray medication used to treat nasal congestion, sneezing, and runny nose caused by seasonal allergies [body's reaction to normally harmless substances) to Resident 1 on 3/14/2024 at 7 pm. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive appropriate care and treatment due to an incomplete/inaccurate medical record and could lead to more medication errors. Cross Reference F760 Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, the facility admitted Resident 1 to the facility on 8/16/2022, with diagnoses of asthma (chronic lung disease caused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) provided care and services to prevent a fall (move downward, typically rapidly and freely without control, from a higher to a lower level) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: Ensure CNA 1 provided two-person physical assistance (help from two person) when CNA 1 turned Resident 1 to one side while bathing Resident 1 on the bed as indicated in Resident 1 ' s Care Plan titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL)/Self-Care Deficits, initiated on 10/6/2023, and the facility's policies and procedures titled, Fall and Fall Risk, Managing, and Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered. As a result, on 12/12/2023 at 10:30 AM, Resident 1 fell from Resident 1's bed to the floor. Resident 1 sustained a displaced fracture (bone breaks into two or more pieces and move out of alignment) at the neck of the right subcapital femur (neck of the thighbone). Resident 1 was transferred and admitted to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1 on 12/12/2023 at 8:15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the spread of infection during a Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19 an illness caused by a virus that can spread from person to person) outbreak (the occurrence of disease cases more than normal expectancy) in the facility, which started on 11/17/2023, by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 2 was assessed for COVID-19 symptoms and Resident 2's vital signs (measurement of essential body functions, including pulse rate, respiration [breathing] rate, body temperature, and blood pressure) were monitored at least every 24 hours during the facility's COVID-19 outbreak (OB). 2. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2), Certified Nursing Assistant 2 (CNA 2), and CNA 5 correctly wore their N95 mask or respirator (a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and efficient filtration of airborne particles) while in the resident care area during a COVID-19 OB. 3. Ensure CNA 2 performed hand hygiene before and after resident care. 4. Ensure CNA 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four residents (Residents 8 and 11) reviewed for Bowel and Bladder Incontinence and Catheter use, was provided the necessary care and services to prevent the possible development of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI, is an infection in any part of the urinary system). a. For Resident 11, the facility failed to monitor the urine output in the resident's indwelling urinary catheter for sediments and cloudiness. b. For Resident 8, the facility failed to provide incontinent care after each episode in accordance with the plan of care. These failures had the potential risk for Residents 8 and 11 to develop UTI. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 11's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included sepsis ( life threatening complication of an infection), Methicillin Resistant Aureus Staphylococcus infection (MRSA,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information on the right to formulate an advance directive (a written instruction, recognized under State law relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated [lacking the ability to meet essential requirements for physical health, safety, or self-care] ) to one of three sampled residents (Resident 238). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 238 to not make health care decision in advance to prepare for the time when the resident becomes unable to make decisions. Findings: During a review of Resident 238's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/8/23, with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a general term describing a disease that affects the function or structure of the brain) and resistance to multiple antibiotics ( medication to treat infection). During a review of Resident 238's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 10/3/23, the MDS indicated Resident 238 had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide necessary services to promote oral hygiene for one of one sampled resident (Resident 238.) This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 238's sense of well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 238's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/8/23, with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a general term describing a disease that affects the function or structure of the brain) and resistance to multiple antibiotics ( medication to treat infection). During a review of Resident 238's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 10/3/23, the MDS indicated the resident had no cognitive ( ability to understand) impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 238 required setup or clean-up assistance (helper sets up or cleans up; resident completes activity. Helper assists only prior to or following the activity) with oral hygiene. The MDS indicated Resident 238 required partial to moderate assistance (helper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide in-room activities based on the resident's activity assessment for one of two residents (Resident 63.) This deficient practice can lead to low stimulation which can affect Resident 63's physical, emotional and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 63's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/2/22, with diagnoses that included depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and urinary tract infection (infection of the bladder or kidneys.) During a review of Resident 63's Activity Participation Review, dated 10/5/23, the Activity Participation Review indicated the resident was alert and verbally responsive and Resident 63 enjoyed sewing, crochet, music, news, and being around animals. The assessment of daily preferences indicated it was very important for Resident 63 to listen to the music she likes and to do her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide rehabilitative treatment and services in accordance with the physician's order for one of three sampled resident (Resident 8). This deficient practice had the potential to lead to further contractures (shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/22/21 with diagnoses that included hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy (refers to damage to the nerves that worsens over time) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest.) During a review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 8/24/23, the MDS indicated Resident 8 had no cognitive (ability to understand) impairment. The MDS indicated Resident 8 required extensive assistance (resident involved in activity, staff provide weight-bearing support) with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt the use of appropriate alternatives to bed rails before its installation for two of two sampled residents (Residents 46 and 63). This deficient practice placed Residents 46 and 63 at risk for entrapment and injury from the use of bed rails. Findings: a. During a Review of Resident 46's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral ischemia (brain injury that results from impaired blood flow to the brain) and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). During observations on 10/10/23 at 10:35 a.m. and 10/12/23 at 8:40 a.m., Resident 46 was observed lying in bed while watching television. Resident 46's half-length bed rails were up on both sides. Resident 46 was alert and coherent and had left sided weakness. Resident 46 stated his bed rails were always up since admission to the facility. Resident 46 stated he did not know why his bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff was available to provide nursing and nursing related services to two of three sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 63) when; a. Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA3) failed to provide incontinent care to Resident 8 after each episode of bladder incontinence (unable to hold urine). b. Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN3) prepared medications on 10/12/23 at 11:06 am for the 9 a.m. scheduled medication for Resident 63. This deficient practice resulted in the failure to provide incontinent care to Resident 8 and administer medications timely to Resident 63. Findings: a. During an interview on 10/10/23 at 12:08 p.m., Resident 8 stated the last time she had incontinent care was on 10/10/23 at 5:30 a.m., and she was incontinent since 10/10/23 at 9 a.m. During an observation on 10/10/23 at 12:27 pm, three Certified Nursing Assistants (unidentified) were inside Resident 8's room, performed incontinent care then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, was administered antibiotic (medication to treat infection) with an adequate indication for its use (Resident 61). For Resident 61, there was no antibiotic stewardship done before administering Ciprofloxacin (an antibiotic medication) to ensure Resident 61 met the criteria and has adequate indication for its use. This failure had the potential for the use of antibiotics without adequate indication of use and placed the resident at risk for untoward reactions to medications Findings: During a review of Resident 61's admission record (face sheet), the admission record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute cerebrovascular insufficiency (insufficient blood flow to the brain), hemiplegia affecting left dominant side (paralysis of the left side of the body due to brain injury), and Urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an incident of alleged resident physical abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to the California Department of Public Health (State Agency) not later than two hours after the allegation was made. This deficient practice may potentially result in Resident 1 being subjected to additional physical abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), hypertension (high blood pressure) and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 7/5/23, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had short term memory recall problem and required extensive assistance (staff provide weight- bearing support) in most levels of activities of daily living with one-person physical assist. During a review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-12-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a medication regimen review (MRR) irregularity identified by the facility's Pharmacy Consultant was acted upon for one of five sample resident (Resident 4). This deficient practice had the potential for harm due to the missed opportunity by the physician and the licensed staff to act upon the reported irregularities. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow), depression (a feeling of severe sadness or hopelessness), anxiety (emotion characterized by an unpleasant state of inner turmoil), and gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD, a chronic digestive disorder where stomach acid or contents leak back into the esophagus, causing symptoms like heartburn and regurgitation) without esophagitis irritation or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft., a unit of measurement) per resident area for fourteen (13) out of thirty-eight (38) resident rooms (Rooms 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 27, 28, 29, 36, 37, 38, and 39). This deficient practice had the potential to impact on the ability to provide safe nursing care and maintain the privacy of the residents.Findings: During an interview with the facility Administrator (ADM) on 12/2/2025 at 10:25 AM, the ADM stated the facility would like to request a room waiver (a document recording the waiving of a right or claim) this year for Rooms 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 27, 28, 29, 36, 37, 38, and 39. The ADM stated nothing was changed and the number of bed occupancy in the 13 rooms. During a review of the facility's letter to request for room waiver, dated 12/2/2025, the room waiver request letter indicated there was ample room to accommodate wheelchairs and other medical equipment, as well as space for mobility and movement of ambulatory residents. The letter indicated there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 13 out of 38 rooms (Rooms 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 27, 28, 29, 36, 37, 38 and 39) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in multiple resident rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect the residents' health, safety, and quality of life. Findings: During an observation on 10/2/2024, from 11:28 am to 1 pm, Rooms 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 27, 28, 29, 36, 37, 38 and 39 did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident in multiple resident rooms. The residents in these rooms were able to ambulate freely and/or maneuver in their wheelchairs freely. Nursing staff had enough space to provide care to these residents with dignity and privacy. There was space for beds, side tables, dressers, and other medical equipment. During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 10/2/2024, at 1:03pm, regarding Rooms 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 27, 28, 29, 36, 37, 38 and 39 that did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident in multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 13 of 38 resident bedrooms met the minimum requirement measurement of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in multi-bed occupancy resident bedrooms. Rooms 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 27, 28, 29, 36, 37, 38, and 39 measured less than 80 sq. ft. per resident in multi-bed occupancy bedrooms as indicated in the facility's Client Accommodation Analysis (square footage measurement of the residents' rooms), signed and dated by the administrator (Admin) on 10/12/23. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space needed to provide nursing care to the residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's Client Accommodation Analysis Form dated 10/12/23, the Client Accommodation Analysis Form indicated the following rooms did not meet the minimum 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident bedrooms: Room No. No. of Beds Room Square Footage 14 3 234.03 sq ft 15 3 234.03 sq ft 16 3 232.23 sq ft 17 3 234.40 sq ft 18 3 233.19 sq ft 19 3 234.89 sq ft 27 3 233.65 sq ft 28 3 232.73 sq ft 29 3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$78,978 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $29,816 — penalty dated 2024-03-28
  • $14,211 — penalty dated 2024-01-31
  • $34,951 — penalty dated 2023-10-13
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-26 for 4 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-11 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Briarcrest Nursing CenterBell Gardens, CA 1 of 5Glendale Post Acute CenterGlendale, CA 1 of 5Huntington Drive Health And Rehabilitation CenterArcadia, CA 1 of 5Laguna Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterLaguna Hills, CA 1 of 5Madera Rehabilitation & Nursing CenterMadera, CA 1 of 5Monrovia Gardens Healthcare CenterMonrovia, CA 1 of 5Rinaldi Convalescent HospitalGranada Hills, CA 1 of 5Valley Palms Care CenterN Hollywood, CA 2 of 5Casitas Care CenterGranada Hills, CA 2 of 5Harbor Villa Care CenterAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Lassen Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSusanville, CA 2 of 5Lynwood Post Acute Care CenterLynwood, CA 2 of 5Monte Vista Healthcare CenterDuarte, CA 2 of 5Mountain View Conv HospSylmar, CA 2 of 5Murrieta Health And Rehabilitation CenterMurrieta, CA 2 of 5Seal Beach Health And Rehabilitation CenterSeal Beach, CA 3 of 5Anaheim Crest Nursing CenterAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Broadway Healthcare CenterSan Gabriel, CA 3 of 5Buena Vista Care CenterAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Highland Care Center of RedlandsRedlands, CA 3 of 5La Sierra Care CenterMerced, CA 3 of 5Professional Post Acute CenterSan Rafael, CA 3 of 5Watsonville Nursing CenterWatsonville, CA 4 of 5Country Manor La Mesa Healthcare CenterLa Mesa, CA 4 of 5Glendale Healthcare CenterGlendale, CA 4 of 5Merced Nursing & Rehabilitation CtrMerced, CA 4 of 5Rancho Mirage Health And Rehabilitation CenterRancho Mirage, CA 5 of 5Modesto Post Acute CenterModesto, CA 5 of 5Ontario Healthcare CenterOntario, CA 5 of 5Watsonville Post Acute CenterWatsonville, CANot rated (Special Focus)Sunray Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AG FACILITIES OPERATIONS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 08/11/2003
IRA E SMEDRA LIVING TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST48%since 08/11/2017
WIN WIN ENTERPRISES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST48%since 08/11/2003
BALTAZAR, EILEENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2022
VIDALES, MIGUELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2013
BUTENKO, JULIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/24/2023
CAPELA, HEIDIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2023
HASSELL, LANCEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2022
LUTZ, LINDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2012
MANOJO, SHEILAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/11/2024
MEHTA, KRUNALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/09/2013
SALAZAR, PAULINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/14/2020
SMEDRA, IRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/11/2003
WINTNER, JACOBIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/11/2003
AMANDA LEE SORENSEN TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2007
CHAPEAUX ENTERPRISESOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2007
CORY ANN SORENSENOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2007
PAUL AND SUSAN GELLER TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2007
SORENSEN FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2007

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$701K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 9%Other / private 29%

This home reported $701K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$414per resident / day
operating cost
$12,576per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$405per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055992. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next