No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Madera Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

517 South A Street, Madera, CA 93638 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 176 certified beds · (559) 673-9228 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 20241 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$373,733 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $373,733 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-14)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
344 E 6th St · (559) 675-4000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
344 E 6th St Ste 101 · (559) 479-4580 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
500 S B St · (559) 675-8788 · Call to confirm hours
Park
825 S A St · (559) 661-5495 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
428 Vineyard Ave

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.8%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.2%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.6%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.9%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.6%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.9%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.9%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.7%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.282.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.021.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 149 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.7%CMS range 32.3–47.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.6%CMS range 9.6–17.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge88.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.0–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.53
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.57
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.82
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.54
RN hoursweekends
45.5%
Total nursing turnover
58.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 167.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

21
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-14)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls for three of six sampled residents (Residents 1, 2 and 6) when: 1. Resident 1 was assessed as being a fall risk, had poor safety awareness and needed to be supervised while ambulating (walking) and the facility did not implement effective interventions to prevent falls, including adequate supervision, consistent with the resident ' s needs, goals and care. This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s unwitnessed fall on 1/30/25, sustaining a right intertrochanteric fracture (a type of hip fracture [broken bone] where the femur [upper thigh bone] meets the pelvis [bony structure near the base of the spine]), pain, decreased mobility and required transportation to the emergency room and admission to the acute care hospital (ACH) for seven days. 2. Resident 2 had left sided paralysis (loss of movement), a history of falls, poor safety awareness and a known behavior of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' environment remained free of accident hazards as possible when: 1. In the memory care unit, facility staff were aware an exit door was secured by a slide barrel lock (a type of lock that requires the user to slide the barrel of the lock in order to unlock the device) and placed on the door in a position that was out of reach for most individuals. An environmental hazard risk assessment was not done for the lock on the door. Some staff were unaware of the placement of the slide-barrel lock and residents were not trained to unlock the device.These failures resulted in the possibility of 26 of 26 residents ((Residents 8, 16, 18, 20, 23, 24, 31, 43, 45, 51, 56, 58, 60, 64, 75, 76, 88, 99, 104, 117, 136, 149, 156, 168, 172 and 187) and staff being unable to exit the door in an emergency and could lead to entrapment. These failures could affect all 26 memory care residents, representing widespread scope and severity and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-08-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of sixteen sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 4) maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status when:1. Resident 2 was at risk of unplanned weight loss, and did not receive adequate nutritional interventions to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status. This failure resulted in a severe weight loss of 7.95% in less than 2 months from 6/2/25 to 7/28/25 without timely assessment, monitoring, or physician notification. 2. Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of protein and calories) and sustained a 9.58% unintentional weight loss from 5/30/25-6/27/25 with no nutritional therapeutic diet type or nutritional supplemental diet interventions (a targeted, evidence-based strategy to improve a person's nutritional status by adding dietary supplements to their regular diet. These interventions are customized to meet an individual's specific needs, often in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent falls for two of five sampled residents (Residents 1 and 9) when: 1. Resident 1 was assessed to be at risk for falls on 3/23/25 and staff were aware of Resident 1's frequent positioning in bed lying on his back leaning against the side rail, right sided paralysis (inability to move), and inability to reposition himself and effective individualized interventions to prevent falls were not implemented. Resident 1 experienced an unwitnessed fall on 4/2/25. This failure resulted in Resident 1's avoidable fall on 4/2/25 when he was found on the floor face down next to his bed, sustaining a nasal fracture [broken nose], a laceration (deep cut in the skin) to the left eyebrow and left shin (front of the leg below the knee) requiring transportation to the emergency department (ED) for assessment and treatment of his injuries. Resident 1 received eleven sutures (stitches holding the edges of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls for two of five sampled residents (Residents 2 and 8) and to prevent elopement for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Nursing staff were aware of Resident 2 ' s decline in functional status, poor safety awareness and need to be supervised while ambulating and failed to assign staff to supervise Resident 2. On 1/2/25 Resident 2 was left unsupervised, and he ambulated unassisted to the outdoor patio where he was found on the ground after an unwitnessed fall. This failure resulted in Resident 2 ' s fall on 1/2/25 sustaining a laceration (cut in the skin caused by an injury) above the left eyebrow requiring transportation to the emergency department (ED) for sutures (a row of stitches holding together edges of a wound) and placed him at risk for emotional distress due to his altered cognitive status (person ' s ability to process and understand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2024-05-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when nurses did not act on the deterioration of Resident 1's physical condition, which included Congestive Heart Failure (is a lifelong condition in which the heart muscle can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen) and edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues) and weight gain. Facility staff failed to provide the necessary treatment, personalized plan of care, nutritional support, and the facility's Interdisciplinary team (IDT) did not collaborate to address the resident's critical medical needs. These failures resulted in Resident 1's transfer to the emergency department (ED) and admission to the acute care hospital (ACH) for a right foot infection with erythema (reddening of the skin), desquamation (shedding the outer layers of skin) and sepsis (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurse immediately consulted with resident's physician during a significant change in resident's physical status for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2) when: 1.Licensed nurses did not immediately notify Resident 1's physician, after Resident 1 experienced a severe unplanned weight loss of 18 pounds (lbs- a unit of measurement) or 9.8% in 28 days; on 12/3/23 weighed 166 lbs. Nursing staff obtained weekly weights documenting the rapidly declining weights and did not notify the physician of the change in condition (CIC) in accordance with physician expectations and policy and procedure; and did not conduct an Inter Disciplinary Team (IDT-an interdisciplinary team comprised of professionals from various disciplines who work in collaboration to address a resident with multiple physical and psychological needs) meeting to discuss the CIC. The Registered Dietitian (RD) input orders to fortify (added nutrition) Resident 1 ' s diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in a safe operating condition when one of two boiler systems (a device that heats the facility's water) was not monitored, maintained and failed to operate from 2/21/26 to 2/24/26.This failure resulted in a non-functioning boiler system, unable to heat water throughout the facility's resident rooms, nurses' stations and shower rooms and placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, infectious disease and discomfort. The facility's residents were unable to shower for three days, and nursing staff were unable to wash their hands in hot water for infection prevention. During an interview on 2/24/26 at 1:32 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated he received a phone call from the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) on the morning of 2/21/26 because the boiler to the facility's water supply was not working. The ADM stated the MS had told him the issue was limited to stations 1 and 2. The ADM stated the vendor (VDR) used to repair the boiler system came out that morning and did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for four of 15 sampled residents when the Infection Preventionist (IP) performed influenza (a highly contagious respiratory illness) tests and did not document the tests in Residents 5, 8, 12, and 14's electronic medical record (EMR).This failure resulted in an inaccurate and incomplete medical record for Residents 5, 8, 12, and 14.During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR), undated, the admission record indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (decline in mental ability such as memory, thinking, reasoning and communication) and anxiety (feeling or fear, dread and uneasiness).During a review of Resident 3's Change in Condition (CIC), dated 1/30/26, the CIC indicated, . Positive for influenza A [acute viral respiratory infection], nasal congestion, nonproductive cough.During a review of Resident 5's AR, undated, the admission record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program when 12 of 65 hand sanitizer dispensers tested were not dispensing alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR-an alcohol-containing preparation [liquid, gel or foam] designed for application to the hands to inactivate germs) when used. These failures had the potential for staff not performing hand hygiene and could have caused cross contamination (accidental transfer of harmful bacteria, viruses or allergens from one surface or person to another) spreading infections to residents and staff.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/11/26 at 10:49 a.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), 65 hand sanitizer dispersers in the hallways and nurses' stations were tested for function. The dispensers in the following areas did not dispense ABHR: Rooms 2, 6, 17, 20, 30, 39, 52, 54, 56, 61, next to the Station 3 shower room and next to the maintenance office. The IP stated housekeeping was responsible for refilling or replacing the ABHR dispensers. The IP stated it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — widespread
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for nine out of 15 sampled residents (Residents' 95, 96, 14, 68, 86, 87, 129, 144 and 164) when:1.Resident 95's tramadol (opioid pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) medication lacked an appropriate indication and an associated pain scale to guide administration.This failure resulted in Resident 95's tramadol medication order not having complete and appropriate administration instructions which could lead to inappropriate administration, overmedication, or overdose. 2.Resident 96's oxygen therapy (a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential to living organisms) was not administered per the physician order. This failure resulted in Resident 32 not receiving his oxygen therapy as ordered which had the potential to result in nasal dryness, shortness of breath, oxygen toxicity (lung damage that happens from breathing in too much extra oxygen therapy), and serious medical condition.3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food reached an appetizing temperature when temperatures for gravy sauce, french fries, grounded burger patty, food in cups and diced pears did not reach desired temperatures during tray line on 8/6/25.This failure placed all residents receiving food from the kitchen not eating their meal and placed their nutritional status at risk which could potentially lead to weight loss. FacilityDuring on observation on 8/6/25 between 11:30 a.m. through 12:45 p.m. in the kitchen during tray line, observed dietary cook (DC) and DC 2 checked temperatures of the food on the steam table. Temperature of french fries, gravy sauce, grounded burger patty, food in cups and diced pears were not checked.During an interview on 8/8/25 at 9:24 a.m. with DC 1, DC 1 stated the practice was to make sure temperatures of food on the steam table including desserts were checked to ensure the was safe to serve residents. DC 1 stated food temperatures are checked prior to serving and document in the logbook every meal. DC 2 stated it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-14 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — widespread
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menus were followed when residents on fortified diet (foods that have extra nutrients, like vitamins and minerals to improve the food's nutritional value to prevent nutrient deficiencies) were not served fortified food as prescribed by their Medical Doctor (MD) on 8/6/25.This failure had the potential for all residents on fortified diets to receive inadequate amounts of nutrients, potentially leading to weight loss and malnutrition. During review of facility's document titled, WEEK 2 WEDNESDAY Cambridge [NAME] CYCLE 2 2025 Spring, undated, the document indicated, . Lunch. FORTIFIED HIGH PROTEIN. SUPER SOUP 6 oz [ounces-unit of measurement]. During observation on 8/6/25 between 11:48 a.m. to 12:45 p.m. during the tray line, dietary staff scooped food in plates for residents, different diet types were observed, fortified diet were prepared like other diets. Dietary staff did not add fortified soup to the food trays for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food services safety when:1.One of two ice machines and food preparation sink was not equipped with an air gap (a vertical space between the end of a pipe and the top of a nearby sink that prevents the backflow of contaminated water).This failure had the potential for contaminated water to flow back into the sink and ice machine and result in pathogenic (viruses, bacteria and other types of germs that can cause disease) microorganism (an organism that is so small it can only be viewed under a microscope) growth that could inadvertently (accidentally) be transferred to food and served to 173 residents in the facility, causing foodborne illness.2.Two opened bags of parmesan cheese and one and one-half loaves of bread did not have an opened or used by date.3. One dietary staff member did not cover all her hair on the sides with her hair net while working inside the kitchen.4. Food scoops used for puree diet were laid on top of the steam table during tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a facility wide assessment specific to the facility needs when:The facility did not include an evaluation of the physical environment in its facility assessment to ensure the needs of the resident population were met for 26 of 26 residents in the memory care unit and 15 of 15 smokers in the facility.These failures placed residents in the memory care unit unable to exit the door in an emergency and could lead to entrapment and placed smoking residents safety at risk.During a concurrent interview on 08/14/2025 at 3:25 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM) and the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated they did not identify any issues with how the Resident smoking area was set up in the past. The ADM stated they implemented changes after a resident was hit by a vehicle, but nothing was documented in the facility assessment. The ADM stated they felt no need to assess issues with the smoking area because they had not had an accident before. The ADM stated the facility assessment was not updated for the lock placed on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect and promote the rights of the residents for 13 of 28 sampled residents (Residents' 2, 14, 30, 148, 38 50, 4, 9, 28, 59, 67, 68 and 130) when: 1a.Staff did not use an alternate communication method with Spanish speaking residents (Residents 2 and 14) such as language assistance, interpreters or translated materials. 1b. Staff was speaking in a foreign language during resident care for Residents 30, 148, 38 and 50. These failures violated Residents 2, 14, 30, 148, 38 and 50's rights to understand the care provided to them in a language they understood. 2. Three female residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] shared a bathroom with three male residents in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 3. Resident 4 watched other residents on her table eating while she waited for over five minutes for her food to be delivered on 8/5/25.These failures resulted in violation of Resident's 4, 9, 28, 59, 67, 68 and 130's right to privacy and dignity. 1.During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for four of 22 sampled residents (Resident 6, 49, 68 and 185), when1. Resident 6's care plan interventions to minimize fall related injuries were not implemented. Resident 6 did not have a bilateral floor mat and reacher at bedside. This failure had the potential to place Resident 6 at risk for an avoidable fall and obtaining fall-related injuries. 2. Resident 49's care plan interventions to address communication problem related to diagnosis of Expressive Aphasia (a disorder that makes it difficult to speak) and Resident 49's primary language was Persian were not implemented. Resident 49 had no communication book and/or translator/interpreter service. This failure resulted in Resident 49 getting frustrated about not being able to communicate with the staff and being understood by staff. 3. Resident 68's care plan interventions to provide his prescribed diet and a scoop plate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 54 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all prescribed medications were available and administered to residents as scheduled for three of seven sampled residents (Resident 53, 82 and 144) when the facility did not have the medications available for administration. This failure placed Residents 53, 82 and 144 at risk for not receiving the physician ordered medical treatment, placing residents at risk for ineffective management of their medical conditions.Findings:1. During an observation of the medication administration task on 8/6/25 at 8:50 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 6, LVN 6 stated she did not administer Resident 53's [Polyethylene glycol] (medication that helps people have bowel movements), because it was not available in her medication cart.During a review of Resident 53's admission Record (AR-a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences and wishes), dated 8/7/25, the AR indicated Resident 53 has a history of constipation (when a person had a hard time going…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-14 · tag F0810 — pattern
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide assistive devices during meals for three of 12 residents (Resident 44, 68, and 67) when: 1.Resident 44 was not provided with a right-hand built-up spoon (an adaptive dining aid [a device used to assist with feeding] designed for people who have limited grasp or face difficulties in supination) during his lunch on 8/5/25. This failure resulted in for Resident 44 not being able to feed himself and had the potential risk of losing his independence when eating. 2. Resident 68 was not provided a scoop plate (an assistive plate which helps people scoop up food onto a utensil) during his lunch on 8/5/25 This failure had had the potential to result in Resident 68 to not be able to eat his meal 3. Resident 67's food was not served in bowls on her meal tray during lunch on 8/5/25. This failure had the potential to limit Resident 67's ability to feed herself independently and safely.1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/5/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a completed physician informed consent (the process in which residents are given important information of the possible risk and benefits of psychoactive medications) for the use of psychotropic medication (medication used to treat mental and behavioral disorders) was obtained for two of nine sampled residents (Resident 95 and Resident 108) when:Resident 95 had an active order for sertraline (psychotropic medication used to treat conditions such as depression) oral tablet, ordered on 7/5/25, with no electronic provider signature prior to administration.Resident 108 had an active order for aripiprazole (psychotropic medication used to treat conditions such as schizophrenia), ordered on 3/19/25, with no name of the licensed nursing staff that prepared and verified the consent form.These failures resulted in the violation of Resident 95's and Resident 108's right to be informed of, in advance, of their anti-psychotic medication treatment risks and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS -assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status for one of six sampled residents (Resident 13) when Resident 13's antidepressant medication (used to treat depression and mental health conditions), and anticoagulant medication (used to prevent blood clots from forming) use were inaccurately coded on the MDS assessment. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 13's care needs not met. During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, dated 8/8/25, the admission record indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (one sided weakness or partial paralysis), depression (feeling of persistently sad and hopeless, impacting ability to enjoy life and carry out daily activities),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 49) when Resident 49's fingernails were long, jagged (sharp, uneven edges) and dirty with brownish to blackish dirt built up underneath the nails.This failure had potential for Resident 49 in obtaining avoidable skin related injuries and infection (the invasion and growth of germs in the body).During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/5/25 at 11:02 a.m. with Resident 49, in Resident 49's room, Resident 49 was lying in bed. Resident 49 was awake with slurred (indistinct and difficult to hear or understand) speech and was able to respond during conversation by nodding his head using yes and no questions. Resident 49 was unable to move his right upper extremity and right lower extremity. Resident 49 moved his left hand towards the left side of the bed. Resident 49's right hand was elevated with pillow; right hand was closed in a fist (a hand with a finger s…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to act upon reported drug regimen review irregularities when one of nine sampled residents (Resident 108) had suggested drug regimen updates and there was no action taken to address it or documentation as to why no change in medication was taken. This failure had the potential to lead to unresolved medication related issues and negative health outcomes of Resident 108. Findings: During a review of Resident 108's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 8/12/25, the AR indicated Resident 108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure (heart does not pump blood properly), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), hypertension (high blood pressure), repeated falls, and schizophrenia (mental illness which affects ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of nine sampled residents (Resident 95) drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs when Resident 95 received tramadol (opioid pain medication- a controlled substance used to treat moderate to severe pain) prescribed for pain management, despite reporting no pain. This failure resulted in over-medication and inadequate pain management practices of Resident 95 which had the potential to result in adverse consequences and complications which could lead to serious medical conditions.Findings: During a review of Resident 95's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 8/12/25, the AR indicated Resident 95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (condition in which brain tissue dies due to lack of blood flow),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with the facility policy and procedures when:1. A box of Nicotine Transdermal Patches (a patch that released nicotine [a chemical found in tobacco] through the skin to help people stop smoking) were found in the Station 5 Medication Cart without a resident identifier on the box.This failure had the potential to cause a medication error and place residents at risk for receiving the wrong medication.2. An opened foil envelope packet of Budesonide inhalation suspension (a medicine that helped reduce swelling and irritation in the lungs) was found in the Station 5 Medication Cart without the date of opening written on the packet.This failure had the potential to compromise the integrity, potency and safety of the medication and placed residents at risk for receiving ineffective or unsafe treatment.3. An open bottle of iodine (a chemical used to clean and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility to provide food in a form to meet individual needs for two of 15 sampled residents (Resident 68 and 143) when:1. Resident 68 received hard toast for lunch on 8/5/25 while he was on a mechanical soft diet.2. Resident 143 was served hard toasted bread during lunch on 8/5/25. Resident 143 attempted to eat the hard toasted bread. Resident 143's prescribed diet was mechanical soft texture diet.These failures had the potential to place Resident 68 and 143 at increased risk of choking (is a blockage of the upper airway by food or other objects, which prevents a person from breathing effectively).1.During a review of Resident 68's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 6/25/25, the AR indicated, Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: unspecified sequel of cerebral infarction (the long-term effects or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:nineNumber of residents cited:oneBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure (P&P) for Foods Brought by Family/Visitors for one of nine sample residents (Resident 49) when perishable food (food that spoil, decay, and unsafe to eat if not stored properly) was stored in Resident 49's bedside table. This failure had the potential for Resident 49 at an increased risk of acquiring food-borne illnesses (referred to as food poisoning, are caused by eating or drinking something that is contaminated with germs/spoiled). During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/5/25 at 11:02 a.m. with Resident 49, in Resident 49's room, Resident 49 was lying in bed. Resident 49 was awake with slurred (indistinct and difficult to hear or understand) speech and was able to respond during conversation by nodding his head using yes and no questions. Resident 49 was unable to move his right upper extremity and right lower extremity. Resident 49…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent infections for one of four sampled residents (Resident 13) when Resident 13's handheld nebulizer tubing (device that delivers medication into fine mist directly into the lungs) had a date of 7/17/25. This failure had the potential to put Resident 12 at risk for possible respiratory infection.During an observation on 8/5/25 at 10:01 a.m. during initial tour in Resident 13's room, Resident 13 was not in his room. Observed a handheld nebulizer at bedside inside a plastic bag a handheld nebulizer tubing dated 7/17/25. During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, dated 8/8/25, the admission record indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (one sided weakness or partial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for two of 13 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 8) when Resident 1 and Resident 8 ' s wheelchairs were covered with black and brown unknown substances and were visible to passersby. This failure violated Residents 1 and Resident 8 ' s rights to a comfortable and homelike environment that would respect the residents' dignity and well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 6/11/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE] to the facility, with diagnoses that included Encephalopathy (a disorder caused by a buildup of toxins in the brain that can happen with advanced liver disease), Protein-Calorie Malnutrition (not consuming enough protein and calories, resulting to weight loss), Anxiety (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when two of ten sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 8) when Resident 1 and Resident 8 ' s wheelchairs were covered with black and brown unknown substances. This failure placed Resident 1 and Resident 8 at an increased risk to develop healthcare-associated infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 6/11/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE] to the facility, with diagnoses that included Encephalopathy (a disorder caused by a buildup of toxins in the brain that can happen with advanced liver disease), Protein-Calorie Malnutrition (not consuming enough protein and calories, resulting to weight loss), Anxiety (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) have the specific competencies, and skill sets to ensure facility staff were properly trained and educated to properly managed and care for residents with infections and to prevent the risk for infections to other residents, staff and visitors when the IP did not provide on-going in-service training and education to facility staff when facility had an outbreak of Noro virus (highly contagious virus [easily spread] that causes vomiting and diarrhea) and Influenza virus (contagious respiratory illness). These failures placed residents, staff and visitors at increased risk for exposure to infections. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/15/25 at 1:58 p.m. with Dietary Supervisor (DS), Inservice Meeting Minutes, dated 1/2/25 was reviewed. The DS stated the topic was on Infection Control in the dietary area only because of a Noro Virus and Influenza virus outbreak in the facility. The DS stated she discussed with her staff about wearing of surgical masks, hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report abuse allegations to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within the required timeframe for two of four sampled residents (Resident 10 and Resident 7) when: 1. CNA 5 alleged CNA 6 pushed Resident 10 roughly onto her bed while providing care on 4/5/25 and did not report the allegation of abuse to the facility until 4/6/25. 2. Family Member (FM) 1 contacted the local police department (PD) alleging Resident 7 was abused by facility staff on 3/5/25 and 3/27/25, the PD went to the facility for welfare checks and the facility staff was made aware of the abuse allegations. The facility staff did not report the abuse allegations to CDPH on 3/5/25 and 3/27/25 according to federal regulations and the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This failure resulted in the abuse allegations not being investigated timely and had the potential to result in Residents 10 and 7's safety needs not being met. Findings: 1. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Administrator (ADM) failed to provide consistent administrative oversight and resources to ensure residents received adequate supervision and care planning when the ADM was aware of 63 resident falls between 1/1/25 and 3/4/25 and did not establish an effective fall prevention program. This failure resulted in three of six sampled residents (Residents 1, 2 and 6) having unwitnessed falls with injury requiring transportation to the acute care hospital (ACH) for treatment and placed other residents at risk for falls with injury. (cross reference F689) Findings: During a review of the facility ' s document titled Incidents By Incident Type, dated 1/1/25 to 3/4/25, the document indicated, . Total ' Fall ' Incidents: 64 . One fall was crossed out in error. During a review of Resident 1 ' s ACH document titled Case Management Discharge Summary/Orders Report, dated 2/7/25, the note indicated, . admission date: 1/31/2025 . discharge date : [DATE] . Slip and fall coming out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan was developed and implemented to meet the identified needs for two of six sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) when: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a history of falls, assessed as being a fall risk and a known behavior of not calling staff for assistance and the facility did not develop and implement effective care plan interventions including assistance and supervision to prevent falls. This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s unwitnessed fall on 1/30/25, sustaining an intertrochanteric fracture (a type of hip fracture [broken bone] where the femur [upper thigh bone] meets the pelvis), pain, decreased mobility and required transportation to the emergency room and admission to the acute care hospital (ACH) for seven days. (cross reference F689) 2. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility with left sided paralysis, a history of falls and assessed as a fall risk with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing services to ensure residents receive services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being when seven of seven sampled nursing staff (Registered Nurse [RN] 1, RN 2, Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVN] 1, LVN 2, Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 1, CNA 2, CNA 3) did not have their fall prevention competency (ability to do something successfully) skills checked within the last year and there were 42 falls between 1/1/25 and 2/12/25. This failure resulted in one of three sampled residents (Resident 1 ' s) unwitnessed fall on 1/30/25, sustaining an intertrochanteric fracture (a type of hip fracture [broken bone] where the femur [upper thigh bone] meets the pelvis), pain, decreased mobility and required transportation to the emergency room and admission to the acute care hospital (ACH) for seven days and placed other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its hospice (care that focuses on the quality of life for people who are experiencing an advanced, life-limiting illness) policy and procedures (P&P) for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 14) when Resident 8 and Resident 14 were receiving hospice services with unsigned hospice agreement. This failure had the potential to place Resident 8 and Resident 14 at risk of not receiving appropriate medical, physical, psychosocial, and spiritual support to manage symptoms associated with terminal illness. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/5/25, at 2:15 p.m., with the Administrator (ADM), the facility's Hospice Agreement with [Name of Hospice Agency], dated 6/16/16 was reviewed. The hospice agreement indicated, . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each intending to be legally bound, have duly executed this Addendum as of the day, month and year first above written . Hospice Services include: (1) nursing care and services by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-07 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, develop and implement an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI- a systematic, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving all nursing home caregivers in practical and creative problem solving) program when the facility did not establish an effective fall prevention program and there were 63 resident falls between 1/1/25 and 3/4/25. This failure resulted in three resident falls (Residents 1, 2 and 6) with significant injury requiring transportation to the acute care hospital for treatment and placed other residents at risk for falls with significant injury and had the potential to affect the quality of care, quality of life, services and safety of the facility's residents. (Cross reference F835, F689) Findings: During a review of the facility ' s document titled Incidents By Incident Type, dated 1/1/25 to 3/4/25, the document indicated, . Total ' Fall ' Incidents: 64 . One fall was crossed out in error. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Responsible Party (RP) for one of six sampled resident ' s (Resident 2) when Resident 2 ' s room was changed on 2/23/25 and he fell on 2/26/25. This failure violated Resident 2 ' s rights when his RP was not informed of a change in care. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/6/25 at 10:50 a.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 sat up in his wheelchair, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was at bedside. CNA 1 stated she was assigned to provide Resident 2 with one-on-one supervision while the assigned CNA was at lunch. Family Member (FM) 3 walked into Resident 2 ' s room and asked Resident 2 why there was a CNA sitting with him. Resident 2 informed FM 3 he had multiple falls since his admission to the facility. FM 3 was upset and asked, why are they letting him fall? FM 3 stated he had not been notified Resident 2 had fallen, but FM 2 was his RP, and they may have notified her. Resident 2 stated FM 2 was his RP, and he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable environment for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 9) when Resident 9 ' s hospital bed ' s footboard was loose and detached from the bedframe, and visible to passersby. This failure violated Residents 9 ' s rights to a comfortable and homelike environment that would respect the residents' dignity and well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 3/7/25, the AR indicated, Resident 9 was admitted from an acute care hospital on 5/19/16 to the facility, with diagnoses that included Cerebrovascular Disease (stroke- bleeding inside the brain) affecting right side of the body, Congestive Heart Failure (CHF- weakness in the heart where fluid accumulates in the lungs), Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set (MDS-comprehensive, standardized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an unwitnessed fall with injury to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH- State survey agency) within the required time frame for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 fell twice from his bed on 2/20/25, unwitnessed on both occasions. Resident 2 hit his head during a fall on 2/20/25 at 6:15 a.m. causing a skin tear to his left eyebrow and fell again on 2/20/25 at 10:35 p.m. hitting his head in the same area causing further trauma to the left eyebrow resulting in a laceration (cut or tear in the skin caused by blunt force). Resident 2 required transportation to the emergency room for sutures (threads used to close wounds) to repair the wound. This failure resulted in Resident 2's fall not investigated timely within the required time frame and had the potential to result in Resident 2's safety needs not met. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3 ' s low air loss (LAL – a special mattress used to prevent skin injuries, often occurring in individuals who are bedbound) mattress setting was not used according to the manufacturer ' s recommendation. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 3 to develop pressure ulcer (injury to the skin and underlying tissues by prolonged pressure on the skin) and placed Resident 3 at an increased risk for falls and discomfort. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 3/3/25, the AR indicated, Resident 3 was admitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE] to the facility, with diagnoses that included Dementia (a decline in memory or other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when one of 12 sampled residents' (Resident 8) oxygen concentrator filter was found covered with dust and lint. This failure placed Resident 8 at an increased risk to develop respiratory and healthcare-associated infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR, a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 3/7/25, the AR indicated, Resident 8 was admitted from an acute care hospital on 1/9/25 to the facility, with diagnoses that included Congestive Heart Failure (CHF- define), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (abnormal levels of blood sugar), Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Pleural Effusion (an abnormal accumulation of fluid in the lungs and the chest wall). During a review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool which indicates physical, medical, and cognitive abilities), dated 1/15/25, the MDS indicated Resident 8's Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when: 1. One of 11 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 1) assisted Resident 1, who was on contact precautions for symptoms of norovirus (a highly contagious virus [infectious agent] that causes nausea, vomiting and diarrhea), from the bathroom to his bed and failed to wear personal protective equipment (PPE-includes protective gowns, gloves, face shields or goggles and face masks to protect the wearer from injury or the spread of infection or illness) according to the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) for norovirus prevention and control. This failure had the potential for CNA 1 to spread norovirus to other residents and staff. 2. Eleven of 22 (rooms 1, 2, 6, 16, 21, 24, 35, 38, 42, 47 and 48) with isolation precautions did not have biohazard receptacles in the room for staff and visitors to dispose of contaminated PPE prior to exiting the room. This failure had the potential for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to prevent falls for two of four sampled residents (Residents 2 and 8) when: 1. Nursing staff were aware of Resident 2 ' s decline in functional status, poor safety awareness and need to be supervised while ambulating and did not develop and implement effective care plan interventions to prevent falls. This failure resulted in Resident 2 ' s fall on 1/2/25 sustaining a laceration (cut in the skin caused by an injury) above the left eyebrow requiring transportation to the emergency department (ED) for sutures (a row of stitches holding together edges of a wound). 2. Nursing staff were aware of Resident 8 ' s severe cognitive impairment, poor safety awareness and failed to develop and implement effective person-specific care plan interventions to prevent falls. This failure resulted in Resident 8 suffering avoidable falls on the following dates: 10/13/24, 12/20/24, 12/29/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional stands of practice for six of nine sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8) when: 1. Nursing staff were aware that four of four sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, 7 and 8) with severe cognitive impairment, poor safety awareness and a history of falls did not perform fall risk assessments (medical evaluation that determines likelihood of falling by examining factors such a medical history, physical abilities, balance, gait, and medications) after falls and quarterly. This failure resulted in Resident 2 ' s falls on 12/13/24 and 1/2/25 sustaining a laceration above the left eyebrow, Resident 3 ' s fall on 12/18/24, Resident 7 ' s falls on 10/22/24, 10/25/24, 11/13/24, 11/19/24 and 12/23/24 and Resident 8 ' s falls on 10/13/24, 12/20/24, 12/29/24, 1/1/25 and 1/8/25 and had the potential for severe injuries. (cross reference F689) 2. Licensed Nurses did not follow the manufacturer guidelines to check two of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS-a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical function) accurately reflected the residents healthcare and functional status for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 ' s plan of care addressed an unsteady gait (manner of walking) and declining health status on 11/2/24 and Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) 2 assessed his ambulation (ability to walk) status as independent in the MDS Assessment Section GG-Functional Abilities on 11/23/24. This failure resulted in an inaccurate assessment of Resident 2 ' s functional status as not needing supervision to ambulate, and the resident was left on an outside patio unsupervised and fell on 1/2/25 sustaining a laceration above his left eye. (Cross reference F689) Findings: During an observation on 1/6/25 at 11:33 a.m. in the activities room, Resident 2 in a sat chair. Resident 2 had a sutured…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect and promote resident rights to be free from abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 and other facility staff left Resident 1 in her room during a verbal altercation between four facility visitors, in a manner that made Resident 1 felt threatened and fearful. This deficient practice resulted in the violation of Resident 1's right to be treated with respect and dignity, and free from emotional distress. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 11/22/24, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was re-admitted from acute hospital on 7/29/24 to the facility, with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD – define), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF - weakness in the heart where fluid accumulates in the lungs), Major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their water management plan and failed to conduct an assessment to identify where bacterium Legionella and other waterborne pathogens could grow. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who consumed water. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Legionella Water Management Program, dated 09/2022, revealed, Our facility is committed to the prevention, detection and control of water-borne contaminants, including Legionella 3. The purposes of the water management program are to identify areas in the water system where Legionella bacteria can grow and spread, and to reduce the risk of Legionnaire's disease .d. The identification of situations that can lead to Legionella growth, such as: (1) construction; (2) water main breaks; (3) changes in municipal water quality; (a) the presence of biofilm, scale, or sediment; (5) water temperature fluctuations; (6) water pressure changes; (7) water stagnation; and (8) inadequate disinfection . e. Specific measures used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that six (Residents (R) 5, R9, R21, R33, R70, R148) of 12 residents reviewed out of a total sample of 36 residents for Advance Directives and/or their representatives were informed and provided written information to formulate an advanced directive upon admission to the facility. Failure to provide residents and/or their representatives with this information upon admission has the potential to result in residents' needs or wishes not being met. Findings include: 1. Review of the admission Record in R5's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Social Service Review, in R5's EMR under the Miscellaneous tab, dated 09/24/20, indicated there was no evidence the facility offered R5, or his family any information related to the formulation of an advance directive or offer to help formulate one. 2. Review of the admission Record in R9's EMR under the Profile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or representative; and the Ombudsman with written notification of a facility-initiated transfers for five of six sampled residents (Resident (R) 2, R32, R96, R130, R148) reviewed for hospitalization out of 36 total sampled residents. This failure had the potential to affect the residents and/or their representative about the reason for the transfer and the resident's appeal rights. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, Facility-Initiated dated 10/2023 stated, . Facility-initiated transfers and discharges, when necessary, must meet specific criteria and require resident/representative notification and orientation, and documentation as specified in this policy . Notice of Transfer is provided to the resident and representative as soon as practicable before the transfer and to the long-term care (LTC) ombudsman when practicable (e.g., [example] in a monthly list of residents that includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their responsible party was given a written bed hold policy/notice at the time of their hospital transfer for four of six residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident (R) 2, R96, R130, and R148) out of a total sample of 36 residents. This failure had the potential for the residents to be denied return to their original room or denial of the resident returning to the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Bed Holds and Returns, dated October 2023 indicated All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies at least twice: well in advance of any transfer (e.g., in the admission packet); and at the time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that reflected the residents' current status for 10 residents (Resident (R) 5, R9, R21, R33, R70, R93, R96, R148, R161, and R420) of 38 sampled residents. The residents' care plans were developed; however, the care plan did not reflect the residents' right to refuse treatment (Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)) and did not reflect residents' sex offender registry status. These failures had the potential for staff not to be informed of residents' care needs or offender history of residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered, dated [DATE] indicated A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychological, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy indicated The comprehensive, person-centered care plan:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide and maintain a minimum of at least 80 square feet per resident in 32 of 73 rooms (Rooms 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49 and 50). This failure had the potential for residents to not have reasonable privacy or adequate space. Findings include: Review of a letter signed by the facility's Administrator dated [DATE], provided by the facility, revealed To Whom it may concern, The following rooms at [NAME] Rehabilitation and Nursing Center are less than the required square footage: 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50. (While this letter revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] did not have the required SF, the room measured 166.75 and had two beds, which meets the required SF.) Review of undated Maintenance Records provided by the facility, revealed the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was a dialysis contract for two of six residents (Resident (R) 44 and R87) reviewed for dialysis of 36 sample residents. This has the potential to affect the residents overall care between the facility and dialysis center. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled ''End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with,'' revised 09/23, revealed, ''Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 4. Agreements between this facility and the contracted ESRD facility include all aspects of how the resident's care will be managed.'' 1. Review of R44's admission Record located in the resident electronic medical records (EMR) under the ''Profile'' tab, revealed the resident was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ESRD. Review of R44's ''Physician Orders'' for June 2024. Located in the resident's EMR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline resident-centered care plan was developed and implemented for two of three sampled residents (Resident 3, and 4) when: 1.Resident 3 did not have a care plan for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease making it difficult to breathe) until after being discharged from the facility and Resident 4 did not have a care plan until onsite investigation. 2. Resident 3 did not have a care plan for end stage renal disease (ESRD-inability to remove waste products from blood and produce urine) on dialysis [is a process by which dissolved substances are removed from a patient's body by diffusion (movement or spread) from one fluid compartment (space) to another across a semipermeable membrane (a layer that only certain molecules (smallest particle of a substance) can pass through] until after being discharged from the facility. This failure placed Resident 3 and 4 at risk for complications from not having care needs planned by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards of quality for two of four sampled residents (Resident 3, and 4) when Licensed Nurses 's (LN)'s did not administer oxygen per physician's order for residents (Resident 3 and 4) when physician ordered parameters for oxygen administration were not followed. This failure had the potential for Resident 3 and 4 to receive inadequate amount of oxygen. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record undated, the admission record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 3's diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease making it difficult to breathe). During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/5/24 at 11:16 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, Resident 3's Order Summary(OS), dated 1/3/24 was reviewed. The OS indicated, Oxygen at 4 LPM(liters per minute) VIA NASAL CANNULA (NC- (thin plastic tube that delivers oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely revise and implement a person centered comprehensive care plan for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's care plan did not accurately reflect Resident 1's refusal for staff to consistently use a mechanical lift during Activities of Daily Living )ADL) transfer. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to experience a fall on (indicate the date) . Resident 1 complained of pain, sustained a fracture of the right femur and placed Resident 1 at risk to experience re-occurring falls. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR) (a document containing demographic information), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Diagnosis Report (a document listing resident ' s diagnoses) dated 03/07/24, indicated Resident 1 ' was admitted to the skilled nursing facility with diagnoses which included, .Osteoarthritis (protective tissues at the ends of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility verbal abuse policy and procedure for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 reacted aggressively and told Resident 1, If I had my way, I would have straightened you out right now. This failure resulted in the violation of Resident 1's right to be free from verbal abuse and placed Resident 1 at risk to experience psychosocial trauma related to the incident. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 10/11/23, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a disease which involves a range of problems with thinking, behavior and emotions), depression (a mental disorder with loss of pleasure or interest in activities for long periods of time), and anxiety (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-04-26 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the results of the annual Recertification and Abbreviated survey results were posted in a readily accessible location for the residents and the public when 7 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 36, Resident 150, Resident 72, Resident 98, Resident 84, Resident 75, Resident 97) did not have access to the survey results. This failure denied Resident 36, Resident 150, Resident 72, Resident 98, Resident 84, Resident 75, Resident 97 and the public access to survey results. Findings: During the resident council meeting an interview with with Residents 72, 36, 84, 98 and 150, on 4/23/19, at 10:40 p.m., Resident 72 stated, I do not know where to find [the facility's] post survey results. Resident 36, Resident 84, Resident 98 and Resident 150 stated they were unaware where to find the binder of the posted survey result for the annual Recertification, Abbreviated surveys. During an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, on 4/23/19, at 10:50 a.m., she stated the post survey binder result was available in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare and distribute food safely when an undated opened bag of shredded cabbage was stored and ready for use in the walk-in refrigerator and an opened bag of flour was stored and ready for use in the pull out cabinet with no opened date. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness to residents, staff and visitors who were served meals from the kitchen. Findings: During an observation on 4/22/19, at 8:15 a.m., in the kitchen, an opened bag of cabbage was stored and ready for use in the walk-in refrigerator without a label of the date when it was opened or when it will expire. The Dietary Supervisor (DS) stated it was opened and not dated. The DS stated the open bag should have been dated. During an observation on 4/22/19, at 8:20 a.m., in the kitchen, an opened bag of flour without a date was stored and ready for use in the pull out cabinet. The DS stated it was open and not dated. The DS stated the bag of flour should have been dated. During an interview with Cook, on 4/22/19, at 11:45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-04-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation in Resident 62's room, on 4/22/19, at 9:21 a.m., Resident 62 was in bed and her call light was on the floor not within reach. During an interview with CNA 13, on 4/22/19, at 9:25 a.m., she stated Resident 62 was independent and yelled when she needed something. CNA 13 stated, [Resident 62's] call light had to be within resident reach at all time. During an observation on 4/22/19, at 10:17 a.m., in Resident 37's room, Resident 37's call light was on the floor and not within reach. During an interview with CNA 15, on 4/22/19, at 10:21 a.m., she stated, [Resident 37's] call light should be within the resident reach all the time. The facility policy and procedure titled Answering the call light dated 10/2010, indicated The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's request and needs. General Guidelines . 5. When the resident is in the bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident . The facility policy and procedure titled Quality of Life -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and homelike environment for six of 80 sampled residents (Residents 26, 42, 44, 51, 125 and 133) when their shared restroom remained accessible for use after having smeared feces on the toilet seat, toilet bowl and on the floor. These failures resulted in an unsanitary and unhomelike environment for Residents 26, 42, 44, 51, 125 and 133 Findings: During an observation on 4/22/19, at 9:35 a.m., in Resident 44's restroom, the toilet seat, toilet bowl and floor were smeared with feces. During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 7, on 4/22/19, at 9:37 a.m., in Resident 44's restroom, she stated Resident 44 used the toilet at 8:15 a.m. before he left for dialysis. CNA 7 stated the restroom was dirty and she was waiting for the housekeeper to clean it. CNA 7 stated she should have alerted the housekeeper to clean the restroom but did not. During an interview with Housekeeper (HK), on 4/22/19, at 9:42 a.m., she stated, I was just told [about the dirty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure titled Medication Storage in the Facility and Labeling of Medication Containers when: 1. Artificial eye drops and ear wax removal drops were stored together with no divider between the medications in the Central Supply room. 2. Two of two tuberculin solution vials (to test for tuberculosis, a bacterial infection affecting the lungs) were stored and ready for use with no open date nor expiration date on the vial. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk of receiving expired tuberculin solution, experience adverse reactions from expired medication and placed residents at risk for potential medication errors from the potential incorrect medication use or route when medications were not stored separately. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Central Supply Director (CSD), on [DATE], at 12:50 p.m., in the central supply room, artificial eye drops boxes were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-26 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet per resident in multiple resident room for 33 of 74 rooms when there were two to three residents in a room that did not meet the square footage requirement. This practice failed to provide the resident in these rooms with 80 square feet of space and increased the risk for residents not to have enough space for mobility and to accommodate their personal belongings. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 8, on 4/22/19, at 2:48 p.m., in station 1 hallway, rooms 16, 17 and 18 had two beds positioned on opposite sides of the room which gave space in the middle of the room. There was sufficient space for resident's personal belongings. CNA 8 stated she had no problem with providing care to residents in rooms 16,17 and 18. CNA 8 stated the rooms had enough space for wheelchairs. During an interview with Resident 160, on 4/22/19, at 2:52 p.m., he stated the room space…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · E2019-04-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for six of 80 residents (Residents, 51, 42, 125, 133, 26, and 44) when Resident 51, 42, 125, 133, 26, and 44's shared restrooms had feces stain on the toilet seat, sides and restroom floor. This failure resulted in unsafe and unsanitary restrooms for Resident 51, 42, 125, 133, 26, and 44. Findings: During an observation on 4/22/19, at 9:35 a.m., in Resident 51, 42, 125, 133, 26, and 44's shared restroom, the toilet had dark brown, foul odor substance splattered on the seat, sides of the toilet and on the restroom floor. During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 7, on 4/22/19, at 9:37 a.m., in shared restroom, she stated Resident 44 used the toilet at 8:15 a.m. before he left for dialysis. CNA 7 stated, I wiped it with bleach wipes . wiped the chunks (feces) . The toilet is still dirty (feces stains) . I am waiting for housekeeper. CNA 7 stated she should not have waited for an hour and a half for the housekeeper to clean the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 80 sampled residents (Residents 16 and 116) were treated with dignity and respect in an environment that promoted and enhanced their self esteem when: 1. Resident 16's shirt was not changed after being soiled and stained from spilled drink and food particles. For Resident 16 this failure placed him at risk for feeling embarrassed from being left with soiled clothes. 2. Resident 116's urinary catheter (a catheter inserted into the bladder through the urethra to allow urine to drain) bag was left uncovered. For Resident 116 this failure placed him at risk for feeling embarrassed from an exposed urinary catheter drain bag. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5, on 4/22/19, at 10:04 a.m., in Resident 16's room, Resident 16's shirt had three dark brown drink stains and food crumbs. There was no food tray on her bedside table. CNA 5 stated, [Resident 16's] shirt is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 74) was free from physical abuse when Resident 112 tossed her cup of iced tea at Resident 74 five times in a period of 11 months. The interdisciplinary team (IDT) (team composed of a nurse, social worker, activity staff and physician) did not implement effective interventions to address Resident 112's known behavior of impulsivity and did not implement interventions to keep Resident 74 safe. This failure resulted in Resident 112 feeling afraid, emotional distress and the potential to cause serious physical injuries. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 112, on 4/24/19, at 8:39 a.m., Resident 112 sat on a chair in the hallway next to the dining room and next to other residents. Resident 112 held a Styrofoam cup in her hands which contained liquid. Resident 112 stated she had tea in her Styrofoam cup. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 112, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 119 when: Resident 119's nasal cannula (a plastic tubing used for the delivery of oxygen through the nose) tubing did not have a date label (start date) as ordered by the physician and medications were administered crushed without having a physician's order to administer crushed medications. These failures placed had the potential for Resident 119's nasal cannula to be used for more than the ordered number of days and placed Resident 119 at risk to experience stomach upset from the administration of crushed medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 4/22/19, at 9:50 a.m., in Resident 119's room, Resident 119 was asleep in bed and was on two liters of oxygen given by nasal cannula. The nasal cannula was no labeled with a date to indicate start of use. The DSD stated, I don't see any date on [Resident 119]'s cannula. The DSD stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain personal hygiene for one of 80 sampled residents (Resident 16) when Resident 16's shirt was visibly soiled from breakfast and was not changed. This failure resulted in Resident 16 not receiving assistance in dressing which resulted in her wearing a visibly soiled shirt. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5, on 4/22/19, at 10:04 a.m., Resident 16's shirt soiled with three dark brown drink stains and food crumbs. There was no food tray on her bedside table. CNA 5 stated, [Resident 16's] shirt is dirty . it looks like what she had for breakfast . She likes hot chocolate. During an interview with CNA 6, on 4/25/19 at 1:58 p.m., she stated, She [Resident 16] does not do things for herself . she is total care [dependent on staff for care]. CNA 6 stated Resident 16 needed help and assistance in changing her clothes. CNA 6 stated, [Resident 16's] shirt should have been changed right away . [Resident 16] cannot change her own…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-26 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed follow their Foods Brought by Family/Visitors policy and procedure for residents' personal food storage when four apples and one mango were found in a plastic bag labeled for Resident 38 with no use by date in one of two resident refrigerators. This failure had the potential for Resident 38 to receive spoiled fruits and experience adverse side effects from ingesting spoiled fruits. Findings: During a concurrent observation in medication room on Station 5 and Station 6 and interview with Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) 2, on 4/23/19, at 12:45 p.m., she obtained a plastic bag labeled with Resident 38's name. MDSC 2 stated there were four apples and one mango in the plastic bag labeled with Resident 38's name and room number. MDSC 2 stated there was no date labeled on the plastic bag to indicate when the food was put into the refrigerator nor a used by date. MDSC 2 stated there should be a date on the plastic bag to indicate when the food was received. MDSC 2 stated after three days the food would be thrown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation during the survey period of 8/5/25 to 8/14/25, the facility failed to provide and maintain minimum square footage for each resident in 33 of 74 rooms (Rooms 16, 17,18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35,38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50) During an observation of the facility on 5/19/19 to 5/23/19, the following rooms did not provide the minimum square footage as required by the regulation: Rooms 16, 17,18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35,38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, and 50. The residents had a reasonable amount of privacy. Closets and storage spaces were adequate. Bedside stands were available. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for residents to ambulate. Wheelchairs and toilet facilities were accessible. The waiver will not adversely affect the health and safety of residents. Room # Square Feet # Residents 16 219 317 222 318 222 319 217 320 143 221 140 222 143 223 140 224 142 225 144 226 144 227 144 228 145 229 143 230 145 231 148 232 234 333 223…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$373,733 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $126,900 — penalty dated 2025-08-14
  • $194,145 — penalty dated 2025-01-09
  • $52,688 — penalty dated 2024-03-08
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-12 for 15 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-13 for 83 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES — 32 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 31 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Briarcrest Nursing CenterBell Gardens, CA 1 of 5Glendale Post Acute CenterGlendale, CA 1 of 5Huntington Drive Health And Rehabilitation CenterArcadia, CA 1 of 5Laguna Hills Health And Rehabilitation CenterLaguna Hills, CA 1 of 5Monrovia Gardens Healthcare CenterMonrovia, CA 1 of 5Rinaldi Convalescent HospitalGranada Hills, CA 1 of 5Valley Palms Care CenterN Hollywood, CA 2 of 5Casitas Care CenterGranada Hills, CA 2 of 5Harbor Villa Care CenterAnaheim, CA 2 of 5Lassen Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSusanville, CA 2 of 5Lynwood Post Acute Care CenterLynwood, CA 2 of 5Monte Vista Healthcare CenterDuarte, CA 2 of 5Mountain View Conv HospSylmar, CA 2 of 5Murrieta Health And Rehabilitation CenterMurrieta, CA 2 of 5Seal Beach Health And Rehabilitation CenterSeal Beach, CA 3 of 5Anaheim Crest Nursing CenterAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Broadway Healthcare CenterSan Gabriel, CA 3 of 5Buena Vista Care CenterAnaheim, CA 3 of 5Highland Care Center of RedlandsRedlands, CA 3 of 5La Sierra Care CenterMerced, CA 3 of 5Professional Post Acute CenterSan Rafael, CA 3 of 5Watsonville Nursing CenterWatsonville, CA 3 of 5West Covina Healthcare CenterWest Covina, CA 4 of 5Country Manor La Mesa Healthcare CenterLa Mesa, CA 4 of 5Glendale Healthcare CenterGlendale, CA 4 of 5Merced Nursing & Rehabilitation CtrMerced, CA 4 of 5Rancho Mirage Health And Rehabilitation CenterRancho Mirage, CA 5 of 5Modesto Post Acute CenterModesto, CA 5 of 5Ontario Healthcare CenterOntario, CA 5 of 5Watsonville Post Acute CenterWatsonville, CANot rated (Special Focus)Sunray Healthcare CenterLos Angeles, CA

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CRESCENT FACILITIES OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/19/2006
BERING PROPERTIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 10/10/2013
JENMAX ENTERPRISES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF23%since 02/01/2007
JK-CSH JV LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF12%since 11/01/2006
MANHATTAN FIVE PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 11/01/2006
WIN WIN ENTERPRISES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF35%since 02/01/2007
BH ALLIANCEOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2006
THE JACOB WINTNER TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2006
THE WINTNER LIVING TRUST DATED 7/08/1992OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 02/01/2007
BRETSCH, GREGORYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/25/2019
LAL, AKASHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/22/2025
WINTNER, JACOBIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2007
CAMBRIDGE HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2014
BULOSAN, JULIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/27/2025
BUTENKO, JULIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/24/2023
CAPELA, HEIDIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2023
HASSELL, LANCEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2022
LUTZ, LINDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2012
SALAZAR, PAULINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/14/2020
SINGH, RANJEETIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2024
SMEDRA, IRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2007
517 S. A STREET LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/15/2006

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 10%Other / private 13%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$313per resident / day
operating cost
$9,527per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$298per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055147. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next