No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

APPLE REHAB

Ownership rollup across 20 nursing homes in 2 states: Connecticut, Rhode Island. The "follow the money" view of an operator’s whole portfolio — the pattern a single facility page can’t show.

Insights

The chain’s homes average 2.3 of 5 stars on the CMS overall rating — about 0.7 stars below the ~3.0 average of the 2 states it operates in. A whole portfolio rating below its own states’ norm is a pattern worth researching, not a single-home fluke. It is improving: across the same 20 homes rated throughout, the average rose 0.35 stars between 2025-02 and 2026-06. We benchmark against its own states because CMS ranks the health-inspection star within each state, so a national comparison (national average ~3.0) partly measures where a chain operates rather than how it operates.

20
Homes in this chain
1,991
Certified beds100 per home on average
82%
Occupied1,635 residents a day across 1,991 beds
+0.35
Star changeacross the 20 homes rated throughout · 2025-02 to 2026-06
2
States covered
2.3
Average CMS rating~3.0 in its states · ~3.0 nationally

Where the rating comes from

The CMS overall star blends three different things. Split apart across the whole portfolio, they say different things about an operator: thin staffing is a budget decision made above the building, while a weak inspection score is what surveyors actually found inside it.

ComponentChain averageBasis
Health inspection2.5 of 520 rated homesstate surveyors’ findings, ranked within each state
Staffing2.6 of 520 rated homesfrom payroll (PBJ) hours
Quality measures2.5 of 520 rated homeslargely self-reported clinical data

Averaged across this chain’s rated homes. Health-inspection stars are assigned within each state’s own distribution, so for a chain spanning several states this component mixes distributions and is best read alongside each home’s actual citations.

Portfolio red flags

How many of this chain’s homes carry the most serious CMS markers. One flagged home can be local; a pattern across the portfolio is an operator-level signal worth researching.

5 with immediate-jeopardy citations2 with an abuse flag14 with federal fines

Follow the money — chain finances

Aggregated from each home’s CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS). Related-party payments are dollars a home sends to landlords or management companies under common ownership — the main channel through which private-equity and REIT owners can pull money out of a home while its own books still show a thin margin.

$20.5M
Related-party expensesummed across 20 homes · FY2023 cost reports
11%
of operating expensegoes to related companies, across the 20 homes reporting both figures
-4.6%
Operating marginrevenue-weighted across 20 homes with a cost report
$605K
Total federal fines14 homes fined

Only homes with a cost report on file are included, so the related-party total is a floor. Cost reports are self-filed, unaudited, and a year or two behind.

Who pays — share of resident-days across this chain
Medicaid 74%Medicare 6%Other / private 20%

Weighted by each home’s average daily census, across the all 20 homes that report both a usable payer mix and a census. Homes whose cost report fails the same validity check the facility pages apply are left out of this figure entirely rather than counted as zero.

Every home in this chain

Lowest-rated first, so the homes most worth a closer look sit at the top. Each links to its full inspection, staffing, fines, and ownership record.

HomeCMS ratingFlags
Apple Rehab CoccomoMeriden, CT 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $14,069 fined
Apple Rehab ColchesterColchester, CT 1 of 53 immediate-jeopardy Abuse flag $41,203 fined
Apple Rehab West HavenWest Haven, CT 1 of 5$26,685 fined
Apple Rehab CromwellCromwell, CT 2 of 5$27,991 fined
Apple Rehab Farmington ValleyPlainville, CT 2 of 5
Apple Rehab GuilfordGuilford, CT 2 of 5Abuse flag
Apple Rehab Laurel WoodsEast Haven, CT 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $64,555 fined
Apple Rehab MysticMystic, CT 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $16,588 fined
Apple Rehab Rocky HillRocky Hill, CT 2 of 5$28,565 fined
Apple Rehab Shelton LakesShelton, CT 2 of 5
Apple Rehab UncasvilleUncasville, CT 2 of 5$16,065 fined
Gardner Heights Health Care Center, INCShelton, CT 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $7,446 fined
Hewitt Health & Rehabilitation Center, INCShelton, CT 2 of 5$8,018 fined
Wolcott Hall Nursing Center, INCTorrington, CT 2 of 5$11,190 fined
Apple Rehab AvonAvon, CT 3 of 5$78,309 fined
Apple Rehab MiddletownMiddletown, CT 3 of 5
Apple Rehab SaybrookOld Saybrook, CT 3 of 5
Apple Rehab WatertownWatertown, CT 4 of 5$25,058 fined
Ledgecrest Health Care CenterKensington, CT 4 of 5
Apple Rehab ClipperWesterly, RI 4 of 5$238,831 fined
Read this as a floor, not a verdict. CMS chain and ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties, and a low chain average can hide strong individual homes (or vice-versa). Use it to know which questions to ask — then read each home’s actual inspection record and confirm current ownership with your state licensing agency.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (nursing-home ratings, deficiencies, penalties, and ownership) and the CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS) for finances. Chain membership is as reported to CMS. CMS extracts retrieved 30 August 2026; CMS refreshes them monthly, so counts here are as of that date. Verify with the facility and your state regulator.