Apple Rehab Middletown
600 Highland Ave, Middletown, CT 06457 · For profit - Corporation · 70 certified beds · (860) 347-3315 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0604) — most recent May 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.9% | 18.0% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 6.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.8% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.5% | 22.3% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.2% | 16.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.7% | 17.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.5% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 4.0% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.0% | 24.7% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.2% | 17.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 42.6% | 69.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 11.3% | 24.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.9% | 10.7% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 71.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.3%CMS range 38.6–60.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.4–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 71.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 75.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.0–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 65.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2019-08-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the clinical record, a review of facility documentation, staff interviews and a review of the facility policy for one sampled resident (Resident #36), reviewed for restraints, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from physical restraints which resulted in a fall with an injury. The findings include: Resident # 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, delusions, breast cancer and anxiety. Review of the progress notes dated 6/18/19 identified APRN #1 indicated Resident #36 had advanced dementia, was very confused with chronic psychosis, needed assistance with activities of daily living, was able to ambulate with assistance of one using a rolling walker, was dependent upon staff for toileting, hygiene and grooming. Additionally, the resident's plan of care included fall precautions interventions. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified severe cognitive impairment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure an Elopement Risk evaluation was completed on admission to the facility per facility policy. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia with anxiety, mild cognitive impairment, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (chronic mental health condition combining symptoms of delusions and hallucination with severe mood swings and episodes of mania), muscle weakness, type II diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation (a heart arrhythmia that prevents blood from pumping efficiently and increases the risk of blood clots and stroke).A Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] failed to identify completion of the required Elopement evaluation. It was not identified whether Resident #1 was or was not at risk for elopement.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation/policies, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to implement required elopement prevention processes for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. Resident #1 had documented cognitive impairment, required staff assistance for ambulation outside the room, did not have approval for an independent Leave of Absence (LOA), and did not have a completed Elopement Risk evaluation as required by facility policy. The facility permitted Resident #1 to sit outside without supervision, failed to monitor Resident #1's whereabouts, and failed to follow missing resident procedures. As a result, Resident #1 eloped from the facility and was later located by law enforcement at a hotel approximately four (4) miles away. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia with anxiety, mild cognitive impairment, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, muscle weakness, type II diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1), the facility failed to maintain a clinical record that was complete, accurate, and timely. Specifically, the facility failed to document that Resident #1 was missing from the facility on 5/8/26 and failed to ensure nursing documentation accurately reflected the circumstances of the resident's departure. These failures resulted in a clinical record lacking essential information needed to ensure continuity of care, accurate assessment, and a reliable account of significant events. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia with anxiety, mild cognitive impairment, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, muscle weakness, type II diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11) and was independent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for three of four residents (Resident #2, #3 and #6) reviewed for medication errors, the facility failed to ensure the physician/APRN was notified timely when medications were not administered timely in accordance with physician orders. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included diabetes and depression. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten out of fifteen, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/13/2026 identified Resident #1 had diabetes, risk for hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) and/or hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), and risk for seasonal allergies. Interventions directed to administer meds as ordered and check blood sugar via fingerstick as ordered. Physician orders dated 3/25/2026 directed the following:fingerstick for blood sugar level four (4) times a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for four of four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3 and #6) reviewed for medication errors, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff covered a unit to administer medications timely and failed to ensure the residents were free from neglect when medications were not administered timely in accordance with physician orders and facility policy. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes, arthritis, atrial fibrillation and morbid obesity. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fourteen out of fifteen, indicative of no cognitive impairment, required assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living), and received anticoagulant (medication to prevent blood clots, diuretics, and hypoglycemic medication (to control blood sugar). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/13/2026 identified Resident #1 had diabetes, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for four of four residents (Resident #1, #2, #3 and #6) reviewed for medication errors, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered timely and failed to ensure staff searched for medications that were unavailable in the unit medication cart. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes, arthritis, atrial fibrillation and morbid obesity. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fourteen out of fifteen, indicative of no cognitive impairment, required assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living), and received an anticoagulant (medication to prevent blood clots), diuretics, and hypoglycemic medication (to control blood sugar). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/13/2026 identified Resident #1 had diabetes, a risk for hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) and/or hypoglycemia (low blood sugar),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure staff acted timely on therapy recommendations for alternative lifts for transfers. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included arthritis, abnormal posture and morbid obesity. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fourteen out of fifteen, indicative of no cognitive impairment, required assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/13/2026 identified Resident #1 required assistance with ADLs. Interventions directed to assist with ADLs and transfers as indicated, physical therapy and occupational therapy as ordered, and offer out of bed Monday, Wednesday and Friday after breakfast and back to bed before end of first shift. Observation and interview on 5/7/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication errors, the facility failed to ensure the physician orders were reviewed and renewed at least every 60 days. The findings included: Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes, arthritis, atrial fibrillation and morbid obesity. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fourteen out of fifteen, indicative of no cognitive impairment and required assistance with ADLs (activities of daily living). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/13/2026 identified Resident #1 had diabetes, a risk for hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) and/or hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), and pain risk. Interventions directed to administer medications as ordered, and assess pain. Record review identified Resident #1 was on a 60-day schedule for review and renewal of physician orders. Record review failed to identify when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for an allegation of staff to resident abuse, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was treated with dignity and respect. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, weakness, and arthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had no memory deficits, was alert and oriented to person, place, and time, and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, transferring, and repositioning. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/25/24/24 identified Resident #1 had behaviors characterized by ineffective coping. Interventions directed to offer social services support and not to invade the resident's personal space. The Facility Reported Incident form dated 11/14/24 at 12:30 PM identified Resident #1 alleged on 11/13/24 a nurse aide, Nurse Aide (NA) #1, called him/her a pain in the ass. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for an allegation of abuse, the facility failed to report the allegation to the Administrator and/or his/her designee immediately and to the state agency within two (2) hours after the allegation of verbal abuse. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included anxiety, schizoaffective disorder, and asthma. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented and exhibited behavioral symptoms directed towards others, such as verbal threatening, screaming at others, and cursing at others. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/17/24 identified Resident #1 was impulsive and not always able to control behavior and at risk for changes in mood state due to anxiety. Interventions directed to avoid verbal triggers, approach resident at a later date, offer a different staff member, assist resident to another area, to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-07 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #17 and Resident #52) reviewed for self-medication administration, the facility failed to ensure a medication self-administration assessment were completed according to policy for a resident receiving medication assisted therapy. The findings include: 1. Resident #17's diagnoses included opioids use and psychoactive substance abuse. The Self Administration of Medications assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #17 wished to self-administer medications, was alert, oriented, able to name medication, dose, side effects, was physically able to open medications as packaged and drink water independently. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #17 as cognitively intact and independent with activities of daily living (ADL). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/27/24 identified Resident #17 was at risk for potential side effects related to psychiatric drug use.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews , facility policy and staff interviews for 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization( Resident #6), the facility failed to ensure medication was available for the resident and for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for bathing( Residents #26, 27 and #52), the facility failed to ensure staff consistently provided evidence of the provision of showers, and for 1 resident ( Resident #215), reviewed for admission nursing assessment, the facility failed to ensure a body audit was completed on admission to ensure treatment orders were followed as prescribed by the physician and for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #415) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to initiate a new treatment order per physician and for 1 of 2 residents ( Resident # 64) reviewed for intake and output, the facility failed to consistently monitor the resident's output according to the plan of care and facility policy .The findings included: 1. Resident #6's diagnosis included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility documentation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain the dry food storage to ensure the area was free from insects and failed to follow recommendations their pest control program. The findings include: The facility pest control log identified a service report by an outside pest control company dated 6/22/24 indicating one fly light was installed in the kitchen storage area. The service report also indicated, under a sanitation/housekeeping section, that bananas needed to be covered. A Pest Control Service Report dated 7/26/2024 indicated fruit flies were noted by a food cart in the hallway and that recommendations were to remove the carts from the hallway. The service report further indicated treatment for fruit flies was applied to the kitchen and hallway. On 9/30/24 at 10:35 AM, a tour of the facility kitchen with the Director of Dietary #2 identified a large cardboard box in the corner of the dry storage room that contained many bananas with the majority of them ripe with black and brown spots and several bananas that were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of policy and staff interviews for 3 of 22 residents (Resident #20, 41, and #59) observed for call bell location within reach, the facility failed to ensure call bells were within reach of each resident. The findings included: 1. Resident #20's diagnosis included Parkinson's disease, dementia and cognitive communication deficit. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #20 as moderately cognitively Impaired. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/23/2024 indicated Resident #20 could be impulsive Interventions included: to encourage the resident to call a staff member for assistance when needing to transfer, pick items off the floor and any other assistance. The care plan also indicated Resident #20 was at risk for falls with interventions including in part to encourage to the resident ask and wait for staff assistance for transfers and toileting. An observation and interview on 10/2/2024 at 2:50 PM identified Resident #20 sitting in a wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the Resident Council Minutes and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure written responses to residents' concerns voiced about call bells within reach and or staff response time to call bells during Resident Council meetings were addressed timely by administration. The findings include. A review of the Resident Council Minutes from January 2024 through August 2024 identified residents expressed concerns regarding call bells being within reach and /or answered. Further review of the Resident Council Minutes identified the facility did not address the resident's call bell concerns until September 2024 minutes. An interview and interview with the Recreation Director on 10/07/24 at 11:04 identifed a form exists for Resident Council Concerns that are written and passed onto the appropriate person responsible for overseeing the concern. However the Resident Council forms had not been consistently used. The Recreation Director was able to provide 2 completed forms but was unable to provide forms for the other concerns voiced at Resident Council or any written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy and staff interview for the 1 resident (Resident #10) reviewed for Advanced Directives, the facility failed to ensure the resident's advanced directives were obtained timely and reviewed each care plan meeting. The findings include. Resident #10's diagnosis included severe dementia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. The admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #10 was moderately cognitively impaired. The Care plan dated [DATE] indicated Resident #10 had a progressive decline in intellectual functioning due to the dementia process. Interventions included: to gently redirect when exhibiting inappropriate action/behaviors, and to give one instruction at a time. However, further review identified no care plan was in place regarding advanced directives. An observation of the clinical record on [DATE] 8:38 AM (159 days after admission) identified a blank advanced directive forms in the clinical record with no indication of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation and staff interviews for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #415) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to notify the physician when the medication was not available for administration. The findings include: Resident #415 was admitted with diagnoses that included sepsis, dysphagia and generalized anxiety disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #415 without cognitive impairment, was independent for personal hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/17/24 identified Resident #415 needed staff assistance with activities of daily living as needed. Interventions included providing setting up for Resident #415 at bedside or in bathroom and allowing the resident to do for him/herself what he/she and assisting when the resident cannot perform task. The physician's orders dated 9/17/24 directed to apply Kerasal Nail Renewal External Liquid to all toenails topically two times a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and staff interviews for 1 sampled resident( Resident # 64) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from physical abuse by Resident #36. The findings include: 1. Resident # 64's diagnoses included mild dementia without behavior disturbances, anxiety, mood disturbances, hypertension, thrombophilia, legally blind and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and had a history of rejection of care. The RCP for psychiatric drug use and potential for adverse side effects of psychotropic drug dated 6/6/24. Interventions included: to have Medical Doctor ( MD) evaluate effectiveness and side effects of medications for possible decrease/elimination of psychotropic drugs and conduct vital signs per facility policy. The care card for June 2024 and August 2024 identified the resident required total care with bathing. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #166) reviewed for Specialized Treatment, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was in place. The findings included: 1. Resident #166 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included severe end stage renal disease with specialized treatment, diabetes mellitus, and polyneuropathy. A physician's order dated 4/11/23 directed a renal diet with a 2000 ml fluid restriction per day. The Specialized Treatment Center was on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. The physician's orders dated 4/11/23 to 4/22/23 did not reflect where the resident's fistula was located or the monitoring of the fistula for a bruit and thrill every shift. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #166 had intact impaired cognition, was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive assistance personal hygiene, dressing, and transfers. Resident #166 required set up and clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #165) reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to revise the resident's care plan and care card related to resident's showers. The findings include: Resident #165 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, Covid-19, and weakness. A physician's order dated 10/21/22 directed to perform a body audit on admission and weekly on shower day by a nurse. The progress notes dated 10/21/22 through 11/4/22 did not reflect Resident #165 had refused a shower or that Resident #165 was provided a shower versus a bed bath weekly. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #165 had severely impaired cognition, was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder and required extensive assistance personal hygiene, toileting, and transfers. Additionally, Resident #165 indicated that it was very important to choose a shower, tub bath, bed bath, or sponge bath and needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #52) the facility failed to provide the necessary supervision and to educate staff regarding interventions for 1:1 monitoring in common area to ensure a safe environment. The findings include: Resident #52's diagnoses included opioid dependence, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder. A physician's order dated 11/16/23 identified Resident #52 was on a Methadone Maintenance Program for substance abuse disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #52 was cognitively intact and required maximum assistance with eating, oral hygiene, and was dependent for personal hygiene. A nurse's note dated 1/14/24 at 12:57 PM identified Resident #52's evening medications were not administered as resident was lethargic. Resident admitted to RN supervisor that s/he snorted heroin in her/his room on Friday night and Saturday night. The resident also stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident # 57), the facility failed to ensure monthly weights were completed in the clinical record. The findings include: Resident #57's diagnoses included Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The Resident Care plan dated 7/24/24 indicated Resident #57 has the potential for a nutritional decline related to recent hospitalization. Intervention include weigh as ordered. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] noted resident is cognitively intact and is independent with eating but requires set up for oral hygiene. A physician's order dated 1/15/24 directed weigh weekly for 4 weeks every evening shift for 30 days. No follow up orders noted. Review of Residents #57 Weights identified missing weights for the months of January, February, May, June and August 2024. Interview with RN #5 on 10/07/24 10:42 AM indicated weights should be done monthly after admission period (weekly for 4 weeks) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for the 2 of 2 sampled resident (Residents # 40 and # 366) reviewed for Respiratory Care and utilized oxygen, the facility failed to administer oxygen per physician's order and label the oxygen tubing per facility practice The findings included: 1. Resident #40's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and muscle weakness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #40 was severely cognitively impaired, was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and toileting and required maximum assistance for bed mobility. Additionally noted no utilization of oxygen therapy. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/1/24 identified Resident #40 was at risk of cardiac issues related to cardiovascular disease. Interventions included: checking oxygen saturation as ordered and per policy, monitoring for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress, and encouraging rest periods as needed. Observations on 10/1/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review and staff interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 215) who had a food allergy to eggs, the facility failed to ensure a food item listed as an allergy was not served to the resident. The findings include: Resident #215 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cellulitis of the lower limb, dysphagia and anxiety. The admission Nursing assessment V6 dated 9/29/2024 at 9:59 PM indicated in part Resident #215 had an allergy to eggs. The diet slip dated 9/29/2024 completed by the admitting RN indicated Resident #215 had eggs as a pertinent food allergy. The care plan dated 9/30/2024 indicated Resident was planning for discharge after short term rehabilitation. Interventions included: to facilitate a discharge plan with the resident/family when appropriate. An interview with Resident #215 on 9/30/24 at 1:08 PM identified she/he received French toast which is made with eggs at breakfast and after telling the server s/he was not able to eat eggs plain toast was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #165 and #166) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure the facility communicated important medical information to the resident and continuing care provider at time of anticipated discharge. The findings include: 1. Resident #165 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, Covid-19, and weakness. The care plan dated 10/22/22 identified discharge planning Interventions included to establish a discharge plan with resident and resident representative. Resident #165 was alert but confused. The Social Service Initial assessment dated [DATE] at 9:01 AM identified Resident #165 resides with the resident's representative and had home care services in the past. The discharge plan was to return home. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #165 as severely cognitively impaired, noted occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder and the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #165 and 166) reviewed for physician orders, the facility failed to ensure the weekly body audits and Braden scales were completed per the physician orders for a resident at risk for skin breakdown. The findings include: 1. Resident #165 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, Covid-19, and weakness. The baseline care plan dated 10/21/22 did not identify Resident #165 was at risk for pressure ulcers and identified the resident was continent of bowel and bladder. The care plan did not identify any intervention to prevent pressure ulcers. A physician's order dated 10/21/22 directed to Braden scale on admission and weekly times 4 weeks. Braden scale dated 10/21/22 identified Resident #165 was at risk for pressure ulcers due to limited ability to respond to pressure related discomfort, being occasionally moist, only walks occasionally, and probably inadequate nutrition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #166) reviewed for specialized treatment, the facility failed to ensure the resident's fluid restriction was maintained and failed to ensure monitoring of the fistula. The findings include: Resident #166 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included severe end stage renal disease with specialized treatment, diabetes mellitus, and polyneuropathy. a. The baseline care plan not dated identified Resident #166 was on renal diet with a 2000 ml fluid restriction but did not identify resident was a specialized treatment resident. A physician's order dated 4/11/23 directed a renal diet with a 2000 ml fluid restriction per day. The Specialized Treatment Center was on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Review of progress notes dated 4/11/23 through 4/21/24 did not reflect if resident was above or below the fluid restriction in any 24-hour period. The intake and output recording dated 4/11/23 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #165 and #166) reviewed for physician's orders, the facility failed to ensure the admission, interim, and discharge order were signed by the physician. The findings include: 1. Resident #165 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, Covid-19, and weakness. The admission physician's orders dated 10/21/22 were not signed and dated by MD #1 or APRN. The care plan dated 10/22/22 identified discharge planning. Interventions included to establish a discharge plan with resident and resident representative. A physician's order dated 10/24/22 directed to give oxygen 2 liters per minute via mask as needed to maintain saturation level greater than 90% not signed by the APRN/MD. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #165 as severely impaired cognitively, occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder and noted the resident required extensive assistance personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation and facility policy reviewed for Resident Rights regarding respect and dignity, the facility failed to ensure residents were not exposed to a verbal and physical altercation between three (3) staff members that involved two (2) charge nurses and one (1) nurse aide. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled [NAME] of Rights/Residents, directs residents shall be treated according to the guidelines in the resident [NAME] of Rights at all times and employees not following the [NAME] of Rights shall be disciplined. Review of the facility policy title Workplace Violence, directed, in part, violent behavior of any kind or threats of violence either implied or direct, are prohibited at this facility, and the facility maintains a zero-tolerance standard of violence in the workplace. The policy directed, in part, violence in the workplace may include, but is not limited to the following list of prohibited behaviors directed at or by a co-worker, supervisor, vendor, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed ensure staff acted on an allegation of mistreatment timely and failed to notify the State Agency of an allegation of abuse in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was alert and oriented and required extensive assistance with the assistance of two person for ADL's. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/14/2023 identified Resident #2 required assistance with ADLs. Interventions directed to assist with care as indicated. Resident #3 had diagnoses that included dementia with psychotic disturbances and schizophrenia. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had moderate cognitive impairment, had dementia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure staff completed neurological assessments timely for a resident after an unwitnessed fall per facility policy. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, osteoporosis, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) form dated 3/10/2023 identified that Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfers, and locomotion. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/1/2023 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls due to multiple risk factors (non-compliance with use of mobility aide). Interventions directed to encourage Resident #1 to stay in the common area/dining room for afternoon activities, encourage to transfer/change positions slowly, offer to change during last rounds of 11 PM-7 AM shift, ensure the height of bed at an appropriate height for self-transfers,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive investigation was completed after unwitnessed resident falls and the facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated timely after resident falls. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, osteoporosis, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) form dated 3/10/2023 identified that Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfers, and locomotion. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/1/2023 identified Resident #1 was at risk for falls due to multiple risk factors (non-compliance with use of mobility aide). Interventions directed to encourage Resident #1 to stay in the common area/dining room for afternoon activities, encourage to transfer/change positions slowly, offer to change during last rounds of 11 PM-7 AM shift, ensure the height of bed at an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was reviewed for inappropriate sexual conduct, the facility failed to consistently document on resident locator (one to one observation or every fifteen (15) minute) monitoring flowsheet form Resident #1's location while on every fifteen (15) minute monitoring. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included alcohol induced persisting dementia. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life, required supervision when walking in the corridor and on the unit, and was independent with walking in the room. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/7/23 identified Resident #1 had problem characterized by inappropriate behavior, Resident #1 had been noted to be inappropriate related to his/her sexual behavior towards staff. Interventions directed to document and report all instances of being inappropriate and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2) who was not able to make decisions for himself/herself, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from inappropriate sexual conduct by another resident. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included alcohol induced persisting dementia. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life, required supervision when walking in the corridor and on the unit, and was independent with walking in the room. The Resident Care Plan dated 7/7/23 identified Resident #1 had problem characterized by inappropriate behavior, Resident #1 had been noted to be inappropriate related to his/her sexual behavior towards staff. Interventions directed to document and report all instances of being inappropriate and psychiatric evaluation. The psychiatric progress note dated 7/8/23 identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #6) reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's advance directive choices were reflected accurately in the resident record. The findings included: Resident #6 was admitted during 11/2020 with diagnoses that included bipolar depression and tardive dyskinesia. Clinical record review identified a Medical Intervention Consent Form dated [DATE] signed by Resident #6 that directed advanced directives were Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed [DATE] identified Resident #6 was alert and oriented, and required extensive assist with personal hygiene. Review of physician's orders dated [DATE] failed to identify advanced directives for Resident #6. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for [DATE] and [DATE] identified Resident #6 had advanced directives listed as CPR (full code). The Resident Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one resident, (Resident #38) reviewed for hemodialysis, the facility failed to ensure physician ' s order were obtained timely for hemodialysis and to direct staff to avoid blood pressures in the arm with the dialysis site, and failed to ensure staff monitored the dialysis right arm arteriovenous fistula (AVF) dialysis site for any adverse signs and symptoms and bruit and thrill per the facility policy. The findings include: Resident #38's diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) dependent on hemodialysis, dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #38 was alert and oriented. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/4/2021 identified Resident #38 had chronic kidney disease, was dependent on hemodialysis with a left arm arteriovenous fistula (dialysis access). Interventions directed to observe the dialysis site as ordered. Observations on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for the one sampled resident, (Resident #27) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure a recliner chair was positioned per the resident's wishes. The findings include: Resident #27's diagnosis included dementia, anxiety, glaucoma. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #27 had had moderate cognitive impairment, and required physical assistance with bathing. Interview with Person #4 (Resident #27's responsible party) on 5/4/2022 at 10:56 AM identified Resident #27 wanted his/her recliner chair placed off the wall so that he/she could see into the hallway. Person #4 indicated that he/she put signs up to remind the staff, but that the signs are removed, and the note was not observed today, 5/4/2022. Review of the Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/15/2022 and Nurse Aid (NA) care card failed to identify that Resident #27 preferred recliner placement.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review, and interviews for one sampled Resident (Resident #25) reviewed for catheterization, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition timely. The findings include: Resident #25's diagnosis included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebrovascular disease, and neurogenic bladder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #25 had moderate cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of one staff for toileting and had and indwelling catheter. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/15/2022 identified Resident #25 required an indwelling catheter. Interventions directed to observe the urine for sediment, cloudy/bloody scant or foul-smelling urine and report to the physician. Observations on 5/3 at 11:10 AM, 5/4 at 9:26 AM, and 5/5/2022 at 9:23 AM identified Resident #25 had purple urine in the urinary collection tube and urinary collection bag. Review of the MD/APRN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for environment review, the facility failed to ensure fans were maintained in a clean condition without debris. The findings include: Observation on 5/3 at 11:10 AM, 5/4 at 9:26 AM, and 5/5/22 at 10:02 AM identified the bathroom ventilation fan grate in Resident #25's bathroom with a coating of a gray lint-like debris/substance clinging to the grate that was located above the toilet. Observation on 5/4 at 1:42 PM and 5/5/2022 at 10:10 AM identified the bathroom ventilation fan grate in Resident #27's bathroom, with a coating of a gray lint-like debris/substance clinging to the grate that was located above the toilet. Observations on 5/3 at 10:32 AM, 5/4 at 9:34 AM, and 5/5/22 at 12:26 PM, identified the bathroom ventilation fan grate in Resident #38's bathroom, with a coating of a gray lint-like debris/substance clinging to the grate that was located above the toilet. Additionally, observations on the same days for Resident #38 identified an oscillating fan that was mounted on the wall,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility policy review, and interviews for one sampled Resident (Resident #27) reviewed for a hearing deficit, the facility failed to ensure the care plan reflected the resident's hearing deficit and failed to ensure the NA care card reflected the need for hearing aids, and for one sampled resident (Resident #42), reviewed for behaviors, the facility failed to ensure that a comprehensive care plan was developed to address the resident's history of aggressive and accusatory behaviors. The findings included: 1. Resident #27's diagnosis included dementia, anxiety, glaucoma. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #27 had had moderate cognitive impairment and required a hearing aid. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/15/22 failed to identify that Resident #27 had a hearing deficit or required hearing aids. Interview with Person #4 (Resident #27's responsible party) on 5/4/2022 at 10:56 AM identified that Resident #27's hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility policy review, and interviews for three of four residents (Resident #11, #25 and #27) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received appropriate assistance with grooming and hygiene timely. The findings include: 1. Resident # 11's diagnoses included anxiety, depression and dementia. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #11 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/24/22 identified Resident #11 required assistance with all my ADL's, with interventions that directed to provide assistance with care as needed. Observations on 5/3 at 10:51 AM, 5/4 at 9:30 AM, and 5/5/2022 at 12:45 PM identified Resident #11 was unshaven. Review of the nurse's notes from 4/26 through 5/5/2022 failed to indicated that Resident #11 had refused shaving. Observation and interview on 5/5/2022 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, facility policy review, and interviews for two of three residents (Resident #11, Resident #27) reviewed for a sensory deficit, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents had access to eye glasses and hearing aids timely. The findings include: Resident # 11's diagnoses included anxiety, depression, macular degeneration and dementia. Review of the eye examination information dated 10/21/2021 and 2/23/2022 identified Resident #11 required glasses and should be encouraged to wear the glasses for full time use for distance and reading. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #11 had moderate cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with personal hygiene and required corrective lenses. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/24/2022 identified Resident #11 had impaired vision. Interventions directed to encourage the use of glasses for distance and reading, to assist with putting on glasses, and to keep glasses within my…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for two of three residents (Resident #41 and #44) reviewed for the nutrition, the facility failed to obtain weekly weights per the dietitian recommendations and the physician's orders. The findings include: 1. Resident #41's diagnosis included Alzheimer's dementia and chronic kidney disease. A Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] identified a weight of 119.8 taken on 1/26/2022, indicative of a decrease of 9% over thirty days and a decrease of 8% over 180 days. Recent decline in weight was related to decreased intake and appetite with noted nausea and COVID-19 positive diagnosis. The nursing staff was updated of the recommendation to monitor Resident #41's weekly weights and nutritional status at weekly nutrition risk meeting. A physician's order dated 1/26/2022 directed to obtain weekly weights every week for four weeks until 2/23/2022. A. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-10 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility documentation review, and interviews for five of five employee file review (NA #2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure annual employee evaluations were conducted timely. The findings include: Review of NA #2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 employee files identified all NAs were employed longer than 12 months. Review of NA #2 employee file identified the most recent performance evaluation completed was dated 2/19/2020. Review of NA #3, 4, 5, and 6 employee files failed to identify an annual performance evaluation was included in the files. Interview and facility documentation review with the Administrator on 5/10/2022 at 1:40 PM identified although employee evaluations should be completed annually, she was unable to provide documentation that performance evaluations were completed timely for NA #2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. The Administrator further indicated that she did not know why they were not completed. Review of facility undated Performance and Review Policy directed in part, a performance review will be completed at the end of an employee's introductory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of five residents, (Resident #38) reviewed for pharmacy review, the facility failed to ensure staff acted upon a Pharmacy Consultant recommendation timely. The findings include: Resident #38's diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) dependent on hemodialysis, dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #38 was alert and oriented. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/4/2021 identified Resident #38 had chronic kidney disease, was dependent on hemodialysis with a left arm arteriovenous fistula (dialysis access). Interventions directed to observe the dialysis site as ordered. Interview with RN #2 on 5/5/22 at 10:26 AM identified that Resident #38 received Cymbalta 40 milligrams (mg) prior to leaving for dialysis three times a week. Interview on 5/5/22 at 11:14 AM with Person #1 who worked at the hemodialysis administration facility identified that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review, and interviews for facility Medication Storage review, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials and pens in the medication carts were labeled and dated timely. The findings include: 1. Interview and observation with LPN #2 on 5/10/2022 at 9:38 AM identified an Aspart insulin flex pen 100 units in the medication cart labeled by the pharmacy for Resident # 15, was open (had been used) and was not dated to identify when staff opened the insulin pen. LPN #2 indicated he/she could not tell how much insulin was left in the pen. LPN #2 further indicated the insulin pen should have been dated when opened and was good for 20 days from the date when opened. 2. Interview and observation with LPN #2 on 5/10/2022 at 9:40 AM identified two insulin vials inside a specimen cup with a green lid, without pharmacy labels or resident names. LPN #2 indicated the vials were for Resident #24, and the specimen cup was labeled with Resident #24's last name and the number 9. One vial, Humalog U-100 3 ml vial, was approximately ¼ full,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews the facility failed to utilize resources effectively to ensure resident needs were met timely. The findings include: Review of pharmacy recommendations and Dietitian recommendations from 11/1/2021 through 5/9/2022 failed to consistently identify recommendations from consulting staff were addressed timely. Interview with the DNS on 5/10/2022 at 11:08 AM identified that she was new to the position as of November 2021 and that the facility has been staffing challenged. The DNS indicated that from 5/3 through 5/9/2022 she had worked as a charge nurse on Tuesday (5/3) on the 3:00 to 11:00 PM shift; Sunday (5/8), on the 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM shift; and on Tuesday (5/9/2022) she had worked from 3:00 PM to 11:50 PM (a total of 29 hours over 5 days). The DNS indicated that prior to 5/3/2022, in addition to working 40 hours as the DNS, she had been working an average of two to three shifts per week. The DNS stated that open nursing managerial staff positions included Staff Development Nurse (SD), Infection Control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for three residents (Resident #6, #25, #27 and #31) reviewed for care and services, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate, to include nurse's notes of an allegation of mistreatment timely, to include accurate information on the medication/treatment record, and refusals of dental care. The findings include: 1. Resident #6 was admitted during 11/2020 with diagnoses of falls, weakness, bipolar depression, anxiety, & tardive dyskinesia. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 1/29/2022 identified that Resident #6 was alert and oriented, and required extensive assist with transfers and personal hygiene including brushing teeth. Clinical record review identified Resident #6 became Title 19 (Medicaid) status effective 3/1/2021. Review of the clinical record identified that Resident #6 was seen by a dentist on 2/28/2022. The dentist identified Resident #6 had very poor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the clinical record, staff interviews, observations, and a review of the facility policy for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #47), reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for the administration of oxygen. The findings included: Review of the clinical record identified Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included cerebral vascular disease, rhabdomyolysis, heart failure, pneumonia and non Alzheimer dementia. Review of the nurses notes dated 4/28/19 identified Resident #47 was short of breath, had audible wheezing with a pulse oximeter reading of 84% (Normal 90-100 %). A respiratory treatment was administered and oxygen was applied at 2 liters/minute via nasal cannula. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified intact cognition, extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, locomotion off the unit, shortness of breath with exertion and at rest and oxygen therapy.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and a review of the facility policy reviewed for dining, the facility failed to ensure staff served and/or distributed food in a sanitary manner . The findings include: a. Interview and observations of tray line on 8/12/19 at 12:11 PM with the Food Service Manager, identified Dietary Aid #1 pulled up his pants with both hands, then he took a plate with food from the cook without washing his hands, and served the plate that contained the food to a resident. Additionally, Dietary Aid #1 was observed rubbing his nose with his hand, took a plate of food from the cook without washing his hands, and served the plate that contained the food to a resident. Interview with the Food Service Manager on 8/12/19 at 12:15 PM identified she witnessed Dietary Aid #1 pick up his pants and the take a plate from the cook without washing his hands and serve it to a resident. She also indicated Dietary Aid #1 rubbed his nose and took a plate of food from the cook without washing his hands and then served the plate of food to the resident. The Food Service Manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a clinical record review, a review of facility documentation, staff interviews and a review of the facility policy for one sampled resident (Resident #32) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to implement measures to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer and/or failed to conduct an initial comprehensive wound assessment and/or failed to conduct weekly wound assessments. The findings include: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a urinary tract infection, atrial fibrillation and weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified moderate cognitive impairment, extensive assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and ambulation in the room. Extensive assistance of 1 staff was required for dressing, grooming, ambulation in the corridor and locomotion on and off the unit. The resident was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers, the use of pressure reducing devices for the bed and chair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1of 5 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to follow the pharmacy recommendations for a dose reduction of a Proton-Pump Inhibitor. The findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, dementia, reflux disease, and dyspepsia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #15 independence with eating, and a therapeutic diet without swallowing difficulties. The care plan dated 6/2/19 identified a nutritional risk related to diabetes, dementia, obesity with interventions that included to check laboratory values as ordered, encourage compliance with the resident's diet, monitor intake, evaluate and make diet change recommendations as needed, administer medications as ordered, set up meals and provide assistance, watch for chewing, swallowing and/or a decline in intake and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-10-07 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of Resident Assessment and staff interviews for 4 of 6 sampled residents ( Residents # 7, # 8, # 11 and # 35) reviewed for assessments, the facility failed to submit the residents' assessment timely. The findings include: A review of Residents # # 7, # 8, # 11 and # 35 Residents Assessment submitted to the state agency identified the residents assessment had not been submitted to the state agency for over 120 days. An interview with LPN # 4 ( MDS Coordinator) identified she was out on a leave from the facility in July 2023, September 2023, October 2023 through December 2024 and was out again in February 2024 . LPN #1 indicated during her abscense the corporate staff was assisting the facility with completing and submitting MDS assessment.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident # 365) reviewed for bladder and bowel incontinence, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate record regarding the resident's care. The findings include: Resident #365 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting right side and anxiety disorder. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #365 as alert and oriented, continent and incontinent of urine and bowel and required one-person assistance with personal hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. An interview with Resident #365 on 10/1/24 at 9:00 AM identified s/he was soaked in urine and was not changed by staff on 9/29/24 from 6:00AM until 12:00PM. Resident #365 identified that the call bell was out of reach and when a female staff entered her/his room, s/he expressed her/his concerns to the female staff who encouraged him/her to use his/her call bell to seek…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed change in condition, the facility failed to ensure an order obtained timely for emergency Glucagon for a diabetic with a known history of low blood sugars. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus. The five (5) day Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition, a diagnosis of diabetes, and received insulin seven (7) out of the last seven (7) days. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/30/2023 identified Resident #1 had diabetes and was at risk for hyper and/or hypoglycemia. Interventions directed include administering medications as ordered, monitor blood sugar, and to monitor for any acute signs/symptoms of hypoglycemia: vagueness, slow cerebration, dizziness, weakness, pallor, tachycardia, diaphoresis, seizures and coma and report to MD/APRN. Review of the nursing note dated 1/9/2024 at 8:38 AM identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interview, and review of facility documentation for one of three residents who required wound care, (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure that the resident's record was complete and accurate. The finding included: Resident #1's diagnoses included coronary artery disease, polynueropathy, and hypertension. Review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified that the resident had intact cognition, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, extensive assistance with transfers and was at risk for pressure ulcers. Review of the resident's care plan dated 7/18/23 identified that the patient was at risk for pressure ulcers with interventions that included, in part, to inspect skin when giving care for signs of breakdown, weekly skin checks, lotion to feet, and to off load pressure to heels with a pillow. Review of the resident's clinical record for the period of 7/18/23 to 8/26/23 identified that the resident was out of bed daily with extremities elevated and heels off loaded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to APPLE REHAB — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 2.5 | +2.5 vs chain |
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOLEY, BRIAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 100% | since 12/29/1986 |
| SINGH, DEVIKA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/10/2018 |
| VESS, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/15/2013 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $872K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075089. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.