No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Apple Rehab Saybrook

1775 Boston Post Rd, Old Saybrook, CT 06475 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (860) 399-6216 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (860) 399-6216 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
519 Boston Post Rd · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
519 Boston Post Rd · (860) 388-1145 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
665 Boston Post Road, Old Saybrook Shopping Center
Park
100 Coulter St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.9%18.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.7%6.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.7%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.5%22.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.1%16.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.9%17.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.6%24.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.0%17.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.0%69.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.0%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.8%10.7%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.3%CMS range 50.9–75.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.2–17.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.5–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.68
RN hours/ resident / day
0.38
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
30.8%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 63.4 residents a day — about 53% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-09)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2022-07-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #64) who were reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure that the resident was provided with adequate assistance during ambulation in accordance with the plan of care and sustained a fall resulting in a fracture. The finding includes: Resident #64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a history of falls, diabetes, and depression. A physician's order dated 7/9/19 directed the assistance of one with transfers, ambulation with a rolling walker, and the use of a wheelchair for long distances, i.e. recreation. Review of the nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #64 was without cognitive impairment and required the assistance of one for ambulation. The Physical Therapy Plan of Care dated 7/9/19 identified Resident #64 was at moderate risk for falls, was able to ambulate 20 feet with the use of a rolling walker and provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents #1) who exhibited behavioral symptoms, the facility failed to notify the provider of medication omissions when the antianxiety medication was not available therefore six (6) doses were omitted. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included catatonic disorder (a neuropsychiatric disorder that presents with abnormal motor, behavioral, and emotional responses which can include immobility, excessive movement and unusual postures or speech), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, delusional disorder and unspecified psychosis (psychotic symptoms that don't align with a specific psychotic disorder or mental illness). The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten (10) out of fifteen (15) indicating Resident #1 had some memory recall deficits and received antianxiety and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who had behavioral symptoms of restlessness and impulsiveness, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was reviewed and revised to address the addition of an anti-psychotic medication when the medication was ordered. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included catatonic disorder (a neuropsychiatric disorder that presents with abnormal motor, behavioral, and emotional responses which can include immobility, excessive movement and unusual postures or speech), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, delusional disorder and unspecified psychosis (psychotic symptoms that don't align with a specific psychotic disorder or mental illness). The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten (10) out of fifteen (15) indicating Resident #1 had some memory recall deficits,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a history of falls, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) assessment was completed after three (3) of seven (7) falls and failed to ensure the resident was kept in place and not moved prior to the RN assessment. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included catatonic disorder (a neuropsychiatric disorder that presents with abnormal motor, behavioral, and emotional responses which can include immobility, excessive movement and unusual postures or speech), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, delusional disorder and unspecified psychosis (psychotic symptoms that don't align with a specific psychotic disorder or mental illness). The Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented to the current season, his/her location, had fair memory recall and required a one (1) person assist for transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents #1) who were reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure the resident was properly positioned in the tilt-in-space wheelchair and was not tilted back greater than forty-five (45) degrees which resulted in the resident getting out of the wheelchair unassisted and falling. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included catatonic disorder (a neuropsychiatric disorder that presents with abnormal motor, behavioral, and emotional responses which can include immobility, excessive movement and unusual postures or speech), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, delusional disorder and unspecified psychosis (psychotic symptoms that don't align with a specific psychotic disorder or mental illness). The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten (10) out of fifteen (15)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for the use of anti-psychotic medication, the facility failed to ensure targeted behavior monitoring was put into place upon the initiation of an anti-psychotic medication. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included catatonic disorder (a neuropsychiatric disorder that presents with abnormal motor, behavioral, and emotional responses which can include immobility, excessive movement and unusual postures or speech), major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, delusional disorder and unspecified psychosis (psychotic symptoms that don't align with a specific psychotic disorder or mental illness). The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten (10) out of fifteen (15) indicating Resident #1 had some memory recall deficits and received antianxiety and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from mistreatment. The findings include:1. Resident #1's diagnoses included Wernicke's encephalopathy (a neurological condition that causes confusion, eye movement abnormalities and gait abnormalities), a history of alcohol dependence, and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rate). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of nine (9) indicative of moderately impaired cognition and was independent with bed mobility, transfers and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/12/2025 identified that Resident #1 had behavior issues including a history of a resident-to-resident altercation with a previous roommate (on 5/31/2025 Resident #1 grabbed his/her roommate's shirt and verbally threatened the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure staff acted on a report of a verbal threat timely, and failed to ensure the State Agency was notified timely after the facility was aware of an allegation. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included Wernicke's encephalopathy (a neurological condition that causes confusion, eye movement abnormalities and gait abnormalities), a history of alcohol dependence, and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rate). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of nine (9) indicative of moderately impaired cognition and was independent with bed mobility, transfers and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/12/2025 identified that Resident #1 had behavior issues including a history of a resident-to-resident altercation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a verbal threat/allegation of mistreatment was investigated timely in accordance with facility policy. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included Wernicke's encephalopathy (a neurological condition that causes confusion, eye movement abnormalities and gait abnormalities), a history of alcohol dependence, and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rate). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of nine (9) indicative of moderately impaired cognition and was independent with bed mobility, transfers and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/12/2025 identified that Resident #1 had behavior issues including a history of a resident-to-resident altercation with a previous roommate (on 5/31/2025 Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for three (3) of three (3) residents (Residents #1, #2 and #3) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to notify the Nurse Practitioner (NP) timely of medication omissions. The findings include: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a fracture of the left femur and hypothyroidism. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/8/25 identified that Resident #3 required staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) related to impaired mobility with interventions included to provide staff assistance as needed. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of fourteen (14) indicative of intact cognition and was independent with eating, required substantial assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff for transfers. a. A physician's order dated 1/7/25 directed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2025-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for three (3) of three (3) residents (Residents #8, #9 and #10) reviewed for showering, the facility failed to ensure Nurse Aide (NA) documentation was complete in the clinical record and for Resident #7 failed to retain medical records within the facility per policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #8's diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, urinary tract infection and anxiety disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #8 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of four (4) indicative of severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for showering/bathing. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/12/24 identified that Resident #8 required staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) due to impaired mobility and cognitive deficits related to dementia with interventions included assisting as needed to meet bathing, dressing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, review of facility policies and procedures, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the infection prevention control program policies and procedures were reviewed annually, the facility failed to ensure that environmental rounds were conducted/completed quarterly, the facility failed to ensure Infection Control Surveillance data collection reports, analysis of infection trends within the facility were completed monthly, along with quarterly reports, and the facility failed to ensure documentation of quarterly water management plan meetings were conducted. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's Infection Control Program Policies and Procedure manual for the period of August 2022 to December 2024 with the Regional Director of Nursing Services (RN #6) and the Infection Preventionist (IP) Nurse (LPN #4) on 1/7/25 at 11:41 AM identified that the policies and procedures manual was reviewed on 3/21/22 and 8/30/24 but failed to provide any documentation that the Infection Control Program Policies and Procedure manual was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for two sampled residents (Resident #24 and Resident #55) observed with medications at the bedside, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered and for one of three sampled residents (Resident #50) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to prescribed times. The findings include: 1. Resident #24's diagnoses included gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (GERD), anemia, major depressive disorder and peripheral vascular disease. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #24 was cognitively intact, dependent on care for toileting hygiene, dressing and personal hygiene, was non-ambulatory and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. The monthly physician's orders for January 2025 directed Clopidogrel Bisulfate 75 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth once a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #53) reviewed for foot care, the facility failed to ensure the resident was seen by a podiatrist. The findings include: Resident #53's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/14/23 identified Resident #53 was at risk for hypoglycemia related to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Care plan interventions directed to administer medications as ordered, wash and dry feet thoroughly, note any changes in skin condition, watch for sign and symptoms of hypoglycemia, and check blood glucose per physician order. The physician's orders for December 2024 directed for podiatry services as needed, the order's origination date was 8/14/23. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #53 had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with lower body dressing, toileting, and bathing. The nurse's note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, during a review of the facility antibiotic stewardship program, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's antibiotic surveillance tracking report of antibiotic use, patterns and resistant trends was completed and reviewed at the quarterly medical staff meetings for a multidisciplinary collaboration. The findings include: Review of the antibiotic stewardship program for the period of August 2022 to December 2024 with the Regional Director of Nursing Services (RN #6) and the Infection Preventionist (IP) Nurse (LPN #4) on 1/8/25 at 1:31 PM failed to identify any documentation related to monthly review of the antibiotic stewardship program for the period of August 2022 to September 2023. Review of the quarterly Medical Staff Meeting agendas and documentation provided for, the first, the second, and the third quarter of 2023, and first quarter of 2024, the facility failed to identify any documentation related to infection control and antibiotic usage/antibiotic stewardship program within the facility that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and interviews for two of five sampled residents (Resident #20, and Resident #55) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to offer and/or assess for pneumococcal immunizations upon admission and when offered the pneumococcal vaccine the facility failed to administer the vaccine as requested. The findings include: 1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in March of 2023 with diagnoses that included anemia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and heart failure. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 was cognitively intact. Review of the immunization records for Resident #20 on 1/7/25 at 2:25 PM failed to identify that the pneumococcal vaccine was offered to the resident on admission. Review of the Pneumococcal Vaccine Consent form identified Resident #20 gave the facility permission to administer the pneumococcal based on the guidance provided by the Centers for Disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents,(Resident #1), reviewed for allegations of neglect, the facility failed to report of an allegation of neglect timely. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included asthma, severe obesity and anxiety. The care plan dated 6/13/23 identified Resident #1 was incontinent at times with interventions included to encourage and offer toileting as needed, to wear a brief for dignity, offer to assist Resident #1 to the bathroom and incontinent care per policy. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had no impairments in cognition, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, required extensive assistance of two staff to bed mobility, personal hygiene, was totally dependent on two staff for toileting, and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries. A physician's order dated 10/4/23 directed total mechanical lift with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #1, #2 and #3) reviewed for incontinence, the facility failed to complete Braden scales per facility policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included asthma, severe obesity and anxiety. The quarterly Braden scale dated 8/26/22 identified Resident #1 was at risk for pressure injuries/ulcers. The care plan dated 6/13/23 identified Resident #1 was incontinent at times and was at risk for an UTI and/or skin breakdown with interventions that included to encourage and offer toileting as needed, wear a brief for dignity, offer to assist Resident #1 to the bathroom and incontinent care per policy. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had no impairments in cognition, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, required extensive assistance of two staff to bed mobility, personal hygiene and was totally dependent on two staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, review of facility documentation, and facility policy during a review of the environment, the facility failed to ensure fire and egress door alarms were audible and responded to timely, and the facility failed to ensure the environment was safe, secure and free from potential access to hazardous materials and equipment. The findings include: On 7/25/22 at approximately 12:45 PM, the Building Fire and Life Safety Inspectors (BFSI) surveyor informed this surveyor that although Northeast and Northwest Units were currently closed for occupancy by residents, the doors were not secured, and indicated there were potentially hazardous items in various areas on these two units. A.) An Observation on 7/25/22 at 1:00 PM identified the Northwest and Northeast Units of the facility were closed with no residents residing on these two units. The doors leading to the recreation/dining room which was located at the end of the resident occupied [NAME] Unit were closed, but not locked. The room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure that fluid intake was monitored for a resident on a fluid restriction and that daily weights were obtained per the physician's order, and for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure a reweight was obtained for a 5 pound weight change. The findings include: 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage 5, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type II diabetes mellitus and depression. A.) The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #8 was moderately cognitively impaired and was independent with eating after set-up. A physician's order dated 4/13/22 directed a fluid restriction of 1200 milliliters (ml) per day. A nurse's note dated 4/13/22 indicated that Resident #8 was on a fluid restriction (1500ml…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the cooking appliances, including the stove hood, flat top grill and ovens in the food preparation area, were clean and free of debris and failed to ensure clean beverage distribution during a mealtime. The findings included: 1. During an initial tour of the facility kitchen on 7/25/22 at 10:00 AM with the acting Director of Dietary, multiple appliances, including the flat top grill, 2 ovens and the vent range hood, were observed to have debris and did not appear clean. The flat top grill was observed to have what appeared to be food particles on the cooking surface, with a dried white substance observed on the metal external surfaces. The flat top grill was noted to have debris and a dried dark substance on the tabletop under where the grill was positioned. The ovens were observed to have a dried white substance on the exterior surfaces, and the glass oven doors were covered with a brown opaque substance on the interior glass, which did not allow observation into the oven without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-28 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews during a review of the infection control task, the facility failed to identify at least one person who is designated as responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. The findings include: Interviews with RN#1 and RN#3 on 7/25/22 at 11:10 AM identified that the facility did not have an infection control nurse on staff and the last infection control nurse left employment in April 2022. RN#1 was presently overseeing the infection control program, however, did not have training in infection control, and was also designated as corporate staff. Interview with RN#3 on 7/27/22 at 10:15 AM identified that the facility was currently recruiting for an infection control nurse. RN #3 indicated that she was aware that the facility did not meet the requirement to designate one or more individual(s) as the infection preventionist(s) who are responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. Although requested, the facility did not provide a policy for surveyor review.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-28 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — pattern
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and interviews during a review of the Infection Prevention Program, the facility failed to notify residents, their representatives, and families of a COVID-19 outbreak per the requirement. The findings include: Interview with RN#3 on 7/27/22 at 10:15 AM identified that a staff member had tested positive for COVID-19 on 7/21/22. The staff member was subsequently taken off the schedule and remains out from work. Interview with the Administrator on 7/28/22 at 11:15 AM identified a facility staff member had tested positive for COVID-19 on 7/21/22. The Administrator indicated that she was the responsible staff member assigned to provide the notice per the requirement, (by 5:00 PM the following day), but that notices had not, as yet, been sent to residents, their families, or their representatives. The Administrator indicated that phone issues had prevented her from initially notifying the appropriate parties, however, once the phone issues had resolved she had still not made the required notification (7 days after the outbreak began) but should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #35) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a personal property inventory was completed upon admission. The findings include: Resident #35 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, encephalopathy, adjustment disorder, mood disorder, conduct disorder and personality disorder. Physician's orders dated 6/6/22 directed behavior monitoring every shift, document: picking at skin, restlessness/agitation, hitting, spitting, use of profanity, use of racial slurs, delusions, hallucinations, stealing, psychosis and refusing care. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, felt it was very important to take care of his/her personal belongings and required supervision for transfers and dressing. The care plan dated 6/21/22 identified a focus of potential for exhibiting signs of depression, may exhibit accusatory behavior at time, interventions included to allow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, interviews, and review of facility policy for three of seven residents reviewed for advance directives (Resident #20, #35, and #50) the facility failed to ensure advance directive education, consents, and orders were appropriately addressed. The findings include: 1. Resident #20's medical record contained a designation of Conservator of Person dated 5/2/18, in the event of future incapacity. Resident #20 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dysphagia and cerebral infarction. A facility advance directive document in the clinical record was signed and dated by both Resident #20 and the physician on 7/27/18, and identified the resident chose to be a full code. On top of the 7/27/18 document, another facility advance directive form dated 8/21/20 was signed by APRN #3 and directed the choice for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The form failed to identify APRN #3 had discussed the decision with the Resident #20 or their surrogate. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon record review, review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and interviews, for one of three residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #55) the facility failed to notify the State health agency of an injury of unknown origin within the required time frame. The findings include: Resident #55 ' s diagnoses included dementia, macular degeneration, and depressive disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #55 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and dressing. The nurse's note dated 12/6/2021 at 4:59 PM identified that Resident #55 complained of right shoulder pain and an x-ray was ordered. The results reported on 12/7/2021 indicated modest degenerative joint disease with mild subluxation/dislocation of right shoulder. A review of the Accident and Incident report dated 12/13/2021 identified that Resident #55 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #25) reviewed for positioning, for the only sampled resident (Resident #48) reviewed for pressure ulcers, and for the only sampled resident (Resident #54) reviewed for abnormal vital signs, the facility failed to ensure implementation of practitioner's orders for Resident #25 and Resident #54 and failed to ensure weekly body audit assessments were completed for Resident #48. The findings included: 1. Resident #25's diagnoses included diabetes, vascular dementia, difficulty walking and abnormality of gait and movement. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #25 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for dressing A Physician's order dated 4/25/22 directed Thrombo-Embolus Deterrent (TED) stockings (compression stockings), place on Resident #25 in the morning, and remove in the evening. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/28/22 identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, and interview for the only sampled resident (Resident #54) reviewed for oxygen therapy, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's oxygen tubing was changed timely per the physician's order and facility policy. The findings included: Resident # 54's diagnoses included Hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease (CKD), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease (COPD) and Cerebral infarction. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #54 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen out of fifteen, indicating no cognitive impairment. The quarterly MDS identified that Resident #54 required extensive with bed mobility and was totally dependent on staff for transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/2/2022 identified Resident #54 was at risk for sleep apnea. Interventions directed oxygen via nasal cannula at bedtime as ordered, and oxygen tubing should be changed every week per facility policy. The quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, and interviews for one of two units reviewed for dining, for Resident #29, the facility failed to accommodate a food preference. The findings include: Resident #29's diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease, dysphagia, diabetes mellitus, and bladder cancer. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #29 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. A physician's order dated 06/29/22 directed to provide a carbohydrate-controlled diet for dysphagia Level two. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/14/22 identified that Resident #29 had a potential for nutritional problems related to Parkinson's Disease and received a diabetic diet. Interventions directed to encourage the intake of food and fluids, offer choices at meals, and provide diet as ordered by the physician, but respect choices. Observation on 7/25/22 at 12:10 PM identified Resident #29's dietary slip indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #13 FTag Initiation Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, observations, and interviews for one of two units reviewed for dining, for Resident #13, the facility failed to provide the required adaptive dining equipment. The findings include: Resident #13's diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, vascular dementia, transient cerebral ischemic attack (stroke), and cataracts. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment and required supervision after set-up with eating. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/31/22 identified a need for assistance with meal set-up and supervision. Interventions directed to provide a lidded cup with all meals. The Occupational Therapy Screening form dated 6/28/22 identified that Resident #13 required assistance with self-feeding. The occupational therapist note dated 6/29/22 at 7:45 AM identified the need for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-31 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to act promptly, including providing a resolution, to concerns and grievances raised during the resident council meetings. The findings include: Review of resident counsel minutes dated 2/25/19 identified a concern was raised regarding call bell response time over the previous weekend. The facility response included interviewing for new staff. Review of the resident counsel minutes dated 3/25/19 identified concerns were raised regarding; not being assisted out of bed in a timely manner, and call bells are not being answered timely. The minutes failed to reflect a response or resolution regarding the concerns. Review of the resident counsel minutes dated 4/29/19 identified call bell response was not timely during the night shift. The minutes failed to reflect a response or resolution regarding the concerns. Review of the resident counsel minutes dated 5/20/19 identified a resident felt frustrated because staff explain (they are running short and that is why it's taking longer for care). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, for 6 of 7 residents (Resident #8, 25, 30, 38, 41, and 56) who were dependent on staff for care, the facility failed to follow the plan of care regarding ADL's. The findings include: 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included aphasia, and intellectual disability. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #8 had severely impaired cognition, was unable to speak and make needs known or understand others, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and required total assistance with care. A physician's order dated 7/30/19 directed to transfer Resident #8 out of bed to a custom wheelchair with the assistance of 2 staff a mechanical lift for 6 - 8 hours daily. The care plan dated 10/21/19 identified Resident #8 is wheelchair bound and is dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Interventions included to anticipate and meet the resident's needs, use short simple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-31 · tag F0685 — pattern
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for vision and audiology, the facility failed to provide routine vision, audiology, and podiatry services. The findings include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included aphasia, anxiety, cataracts, anxiety, and profound intellectual disabilities. A Nursing admission assessment dated on 1/11/17 identified Resident #8's hearing was adequate in both ears, and vision was impaired. A physician's order dated 1/13/17 directed to consult vision, dental, podiatry, and audiology, as needed. A Department of Developmental Services annual report dated 9/21/18 identified because the review was unable to find Resident #8 had consultations with podiatry, vision, dental and audiology, the facility was asked to follow up with Resident #8's primary physician to obtain the services. Additionally, the report indicated if the resident had not received these services,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, for 6 of 7 residents (Resident #8, 25, 30, 38, 41, and 56) who were dependent on staff for care, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents according to the plan of care. The findings include: 1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included aphasia, and intellectual disability. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #8 had severely impaired cognition, was unable to speak and make needs known or understand others, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and required total assistance with care. A physician's order dated 7/30/19 directed to transfer Resident #8 out of bed to a custom wheelchair with the assistance of 2 staff a mechanical lift for 6 - 8 hours daily. The care plan dated 10/21/19 identified Resident #8 is wheelchair bound and is dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Interventions included to anticipate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-31 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 2 (Resident #4 and 8) reviewed for dental services, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided in a timely manner. The findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a stroke, heart failure and peripheral vascular disease. Review of a dental request for service form dated 1/9/19 and signed by resident's representative identified Resident #4 requested to be seen for dental services. The admission nutritional assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident was missing teeth and had teeth in poor condition, and was on a carbohydrate controlled regular consistency diet with thin liquids. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified the resident was cognitively intact and was independent with eating after set up. The care plan dated 1/29/19 identified Resident #4 had a history of dental caries and was at risk for complications. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policies and staff interviews, the facility failed to store food and/or remove expired food items according to professional standards. The findings include: a. A tour of the kitchen on 10/28/19 at 9:45 AM with the Food Service Director (FSD) identified the following: In the walk in refrigerator; a container of egg salad dated 10/16/19 (12 days ago) and a container of tuna salad dated 10/24/19, (4 days ago). The FSD identified she did not know who prepared the food items and indicated the items were good for 3 days after the date on the container. Additionally, the FSD identified the outdated food items should have been discarded. Further, the FSD indicated it was everyone's job to check for and discard outdated items in the refrigerator; however, the responsibility was not assigned to any one person. b. Observation of the freezer on 10/28/19 at 10:00 AM with the FSD identified 4 boxes that contained open unsealed bags of dinner rolls, sausage links, hamburger patties, dark meat chicken patties and a bag of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and review of facility documentation and interview with the Director of Maintenance the facility failed to ensure that a water management plan was in place to Reduce Legionella Risk in the Healthcare Facility Water Systems to Prevent Cases and Outbreaks of Legionnaires' Disease (LD) as required by 42 CFR §483.80 for skilled nursing facilities. On 10/29/19 at 10:30 AM, the surveyor was provided with documentation by the Director of Maintenance to indicate the facility had a comprehensive water management plan in place as required. However, the facility failed to follow recommendations made in the plan to eliminate identified dead ends in the water system. The facility also did not supply documentation that the water was ran in the identified areas in the water system. The surveyor witnessed tubs with plywood over them and shelving installed negating the ability to run the water. The lack of initiating the recommended control measures did not reduce the risks for Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens; e.g., Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #46 and 58) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure that the residents pneumococcal vaccination history was complete and that pneumococcal vaccinations were offered and administered per facility policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diabetes, anxiety and major depression. Review of the immunization tracking form identified Resident #46 had received one dose of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV 23) on 10/1/05. Review of the clinical record on 10/29/19 failed to reflect Resident #46 had been offered or received the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV 13) between 7/19/19 - 10/29/19. Subsequent to surveyor inquiry the resident's immunizations record was updated on 10/30/19 and identified Resident #46 had received the (PVC 13) vaccine on 11/10/15. 2. Resident #58 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #278) reviewed for rehabilitation, the facility failed to ensure a functional maintenance program was followed according to the plan of care. The findings include: Resident #278 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included recent surgery, generalized muscle weakness, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility. The 5-day MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #278 had severely impaired cognition, was totally dependent for eating, and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, walking in the corridor, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #278 had potential for increased independence related to activities of daily living. The care plan dated 10/3/19 identified Resident #278 was weak following a hospitalization and required assistance with activities of daily living, with a goal to achieve the highest level…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #279) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident was assessed and monitored by nursing and by the physician for 2 days after admission, and failed to document care according to physician's orders. Hospital documentation dated 10/27/19 identified that Resident #279 had been admitted to the hospital for 7 days with a respiratory infection. Resident #279 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute on chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. An APRN order dated 10/27/19 directed to check the resident's bowel sounds each shift, to check vital signs every shift for 3 days, to obtain an admission height and weight, and to monitor intake and output for 72 hours. Interview with Resident #279 on 10/28/19 at 12:25 PM identified that he/she had been admitted to the facility the previous day and indicated that although the nursing staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for range of motion, the facility failed to provide care according to professional standards to re-evaluate a splint, used to treat a contracture, after the resident's continuous refusals. The findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis, contracture to left hand, and dementia. An orthopedic consultation dated 4/18/19 indicated Resident #2 was recommended for tendon lengthening procedure to address chronic contracture to left hand. Review of a Nursing to Therapy Communication form dated 5/26/19 indicated per orthopedic recommendation, please evaluate left hand, question need for a splint. A splinting consultation dated 6/5/19 identified Resident #2 has a severe degree of contracture to the left hand. The consultation indicated a left hand splint was provided. An Occupation Therapy Plan of Care dated 6/5/19 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and staff interviews for 1 resident (Resident #61) reviewed for medication errors, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a significant medication error. The findings include: Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #61 had mild cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with transfers and did not walk. Additionally the MDS identified Resident #61 had no behaviors and required an antipsychotic medication 7 days a week. The physician's order dated 9/4/19 directed to administer Lithium Carbonate (a medication used to treat bipolar disorder, which requires blood tests to monitor blood levels to ensure the correct dose is prescribed) 300 mg every morning and at bedtime. Review of the September 2019 MAR identified that Lithium Carbonate 300 mg was not administered on 9/28/19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record and staff interviews for 1 resident (Resident #328), reviewed for medication storage, the facility failed to ensure a medication was stored in an appropriate container with approved labeling according to current acceptable professional standards. The findings include: Resident #328 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, anxiety and morbid obesity. The physician's orders dated 10/25/19 directed to administer Sudafed 10 mg every 4 hours as needed for cold symptoms, not to exceed 6 tabs in 24 hours. Review of the October 2019 MAR identified Sudafed 10mg was administered once on 10/27/19 and 2 times on 10/28/19. Interview and observation of the medication cart on the North East Wing on 10/28/19 at 12:23 PM with LPN #3 identified a brown medicine container with 12 red pills located in the top drawer of the cart. Additionally, the bottle had a makeshift label cut from a Sudafed box that read (Sudafed PE…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-01-09 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, review of facility policy, and interviews for two sampled residents (Resident #5, and #17) who had annual MDS assessments, the facility failed to ensure the assessments were completed. The findings include: 1. Resident #5's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis of liver, and dependence on renal dialysis. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified the following assessment areas were incomplete: section C which indicates the resident's cognitive function, section D which indicates mood, and section E which indicates behaviors. Review of the clinical record failed to identify a note indicating a reason Resident #5's assessment was incomplete in the identified areas. Interview with the Corporate Director of Social Services (SW #1) on 1/8/25 at 11:20 PM identified she had been assisting in the facility since February 2024 but has been more involved in the last two months because the social worker position has been vacant during that time. She identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sample resident (Resident #53) reviewed for foot care, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was comprehensive and did not indicate resolved problems. The findings include: Resident #53 's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side. Resident #53's care plan was dated 8/13/23 and there were no other dates on the care plan identifying when the care plan was reviewed or revised. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #53 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living ranging from set-up help to substantial assistance from staff. Review of the MDS assessments identified quarterly assessments dated 11/18/23, 1/19/24, 4/20/24, 5/25/24, and 11/1/24 were completed and an annual assessment dated [DATE] was completed. Further review of the care plan identified concerns that were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-01-09 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for 2 of 3 nurses' aides reviewed (NA #4 & NA #9) the facility failed to ensure annual performance reviews were completed, the findings include: Review of NA #4's employee file on 1/8/25 identified he/she was hired on 9/12/1983. The file failed to contain an annual performance evaluation for 2023 or 2024. Review of NA #9's employee file on 1/8/25 identified he/she was hired on 4/20/2002. The file failed to contain an annual performance evaluation for 2023 or 2024. Interview on 1/9/25 at 11:02 AM with the Regional Nurse (RN #5) indicated the performance reviews for 2023 and 2024 had not been completed and she did not give a reason why they were not conducted. Interview on 1/9/25 at 11:41 AM with the DNS identified she is responsible for completing the performance reviews and she has not prioritized doing them. The DNS further noted that a monthly email is received from human resources (HR) that indicates which employees are due for performance reviews. The Performance and Review policy directed that a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for two of five sampled residents (Resident #20 and Resident #53) reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure the resident's completed and signed vaccination consent forms were included in the medical records. The findings include: 1. Resident #20's diagnoses included anemia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and heart failure. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 was cognitively intact, dependent on care for toileting hygiene, dressing and required substantial or maximal assistance with personal hygiene. The assessment further identified Resident #20 was non-ambulatory and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Review of the electronic and paper clinical records failed to identity a copy of the COVID-19 booster vaccine consent form provided to the resident prior to the vaccine administration in June of 2023, and the paper clinical records identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, facility policy review, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #48) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include documentation related to skin integrity. The findings included: Resident #48's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, and failure to thrive. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #48 had short and long-term memory loss, required extensive assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. A. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/25/22 identified that Resident #48 had a right lateral foot pressure injury. Interventions directed to follow the facility protocol/policy for treatment of pressure injuries and monitor response to treatment. Review of the wound care physician's notes identified an acute right lateral foot pressure injury on 5/26/22. A physician's order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, facility policy review, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident # 48) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene practices were maintained while providing wound/dressing care. The findings included: Resident #48's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, and failure to thrive. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #48 had short and long-term memory loss, required extensive assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/25/22 identified that Resident #48 had a right lateral foot pressure injury. Interventions directed to follow the facility protocol/policy for treatment of pressure injuries and monitor response to treatment. Review of the wound care physician's notes identified an acute right lateral foot pressure injury on 5/26/22. A physician's order dated 7/1/2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to APPLE REHAB — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FOLEY, BRIANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR100%since 09/09/2009
SINGH, DEVIKAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/10/2018
VESS, RYANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/15/2013

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-19.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 4%Other / private 18%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$375per resident / day
operating cost
$11,402per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$315per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075070. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next