Wolcott Hall Nursing Center, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 90 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 48.9 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #42) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from injury resulting from an instant hot pack. The findings include: Resident #42's diagnoses included dementia, ulcerative colitis, liver cancer, brain cancer, and colon cancer. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #42 had intact cognition (BIMS of 15), was totally dependent on staff for transfers, toileting, hygiene, and dressing, and utilized a manual wheelchair for mobility. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/15/24 identified Resident #42 had a recall, memory impairment and impaired decision making related to dementia. Care plan interventions directed to use short and simple sentences, allow time to respond when speaking to the resident, when confused or forgetful offer gentle reminders, and if the resident does not understand, please state in simple terms. The physician's orders for the month of November 2024 directed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure facility staff provided adequate supervision to prevent Resident #1 from exiting the facility unattended. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included depression, anxiety, congestive heart failure, pressure ulcer to the heel and a history of falls. The significant change in status Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had some memory recall deficits, required substantial assistance with toileting hygiene, was dependent for bathing, dressing and personal hygiene, and utilized a walker and/or wheelchair for mobility. The Nursing Evaluations dated 11/10/25 identified Resident #1 was not at risk for elopement. A December monthly physician's order identified Resident #1 may go out on a leave of absence with a responsible party. The nurse's note dated 12/28/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and review of facility documentation and policies for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for fluid status, the facility failed to complete dehydration evaluations in accordance with facility policy and failed to notify the provider with the results of a dehydration evaluation timely. The findings included: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included adjustment disorder with depressed mood, peripheral vascular disease, and unspecified congestive heart failure. Review of the Nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a very poor food intake pattern, Resident #1 never ate a complete meal, rarely ate more than one-third of any food offered, ate two (2) servings or less of protein (meat or dairy products) per day, and took fluids poorly. Review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of five (5) indicative of severely impaired cognition.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled medications in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and failed to have a system in place to keep an accurate accounting of controlled medications. The findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 11:35 AM identified the DNS office contained a binder that held the yellow Controlled Substance Disposition Records (CSDR), the CSDR sheets were organized alphabetically. Additionally, some of the yellow CSDR sheets were from 2023 and had not yet been reconciled with the white CSDR nor were the medications identified as having been destructed. The book did not contain audit sheets for 2024 and the last signed off narcotic audit was [DATE] Interview on [DATE] at 11:45 AM with the DNS and RN#8 identified that the DNS is responsible for narcotic reconciliation in the facility and completed an audit on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for one of two sampled residents (Resident #252) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure a physician order was in place for a resident who required oxygen therapy. The findings included: Resident #252 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included dementia, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance anxiety, and dyspnea. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #252 was administered oxygen via nasal cannula at 2 lpm (liters per minute) while in the hospital. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] at 11:05 AM identified Resident #252 was admitted to the facility with diminished lung sounds, exhibited shortness of breath (SOB) with exertion, utilized oxygen, and had diagnoses of asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) The baseline care plan dated 1/29/25 identified Resident #252 received respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication administration cart was appropriately secured during the medication administration pass while not within the line of sight of the nurse. The findings include: Observations of medication administration on 2/6/25 at 9:31 AM identified LPN #2 was able to access the medications without using a key to unlock the medication cart. She used her fingers to pull the lock out and was able to open the drawers containing the medications. LPN #2 prepared Resident #45's medications and then pushed the lock in on the cart and entered the resident's room and pulled the privacy curtain. The medication cart was not within LPN #2's line of sight. LPN #2 returned to the cart and was able to pull the locking mechanism out and without using a key, was able to access medications. At 9:52 AM, LPN #2 prepared medications for Resident #250, LPN#2 pushed the locking mechanism on the med cart, entered the room, and pulled the privacy curtain closed. The medication cart was not within LPN #2's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, and interviews for two of five sampled residents (Resident #4 and Resident #5), reviewed for immunizations, the facility failed to ensure that the pneumococcal vaccine was administered as requested by the resident upon admission. The findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in September of 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, anemia, and atrial fibrillation. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the Pneumococcal Vaccine Consent form identified Resident #4 responsible party gave the facility permission to administer the pneumococcal based on the guidance provided on current pneumococcal vaccine schedule per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in collaboration with the provider oversight on 10/9/24. Review of Resident #4 clinical records on 2/6/25 failed to identify that he/she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for grievances, the facility failed to initiate a grievance concern for a missing item. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included dementia, anxiety, agitation, and depression. A progress note dated 1/10/2023 at 12:07 P.M. written by the Administrator identified she was notified of Resident #1's misplaced wedding ring. The Administrator identified a concern form would be initiated, she spoke with Resident #1's family member regarding Resident #1's misplaced wedding ring and will initiate a search. A progress note dated 1/11/2023 at 8:25 P.M. written by the Administrator identified she followed up with Resident #1's family member in person today regarding Resident #1's misplaced ring and a search was still in progress. Review of the facility's Grievance Log from 1/1/2023 to 12/31/2023 failed to provide documentation to reflect a grievance concern form was completed on 1/10/2023 for Resident #1's missing wedding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for medication errors, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered in accordance with physician orders and failed to ensure the resident received the correct dose of a cancer treatment medication. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the prostate and malignant neoplasm of the bone. A physician order dated 10/3/2022 directed to administer Abiraterone Acetate (used to treat cancer) 250 milligrams (mg), four (4) tablets once a day for a total dose of 1000 mg for prostate cancer. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition, had a diagnosis of cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and obstructive uropathy. The facility medication error report dated 11/2/2022 identified after counting the Abiraterone Acetate for planned discharge, the facility staff identified a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-10-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the environment was maintained in a clean, sanitary, and homelike manner. The findings included: Review of the infection control surveillance and safety rounds dated 8/22 completed by LPN #3 (who collected data) identified all areas has been met. Recommendations of Infection Control Nurse identified the facility needed painting. Observations during tour on 9/28/22 from 10:30 AM through 11:30 AM and again on 10/4/22 at 8:38 AM with the Administrator, DNS, and the Maintenance/Housekeeping/Laundry Director identified the following: a. Damaged, chipped, marred bedroom walls, bathroom walls, hallways walls, and/or bathroom doors in rooms on the [NAME] Court unit #204, 207, 210, and 211. The Migeon Lane unit #101, 103, 105, hallway, 110, 114, 116, and rehabilitation department. b. Damaged and cracked floor tiles in bedroom in rooms on the [NAME] Court unit 200, nurse's station, hallway, and in 206. The Migeon Lane unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 30) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure consistent conduct weekly wound monitoring for a resident with a pressure ulcer. The findings include: Resident #30 was admitted with diagnoses that included type II diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 was without cognitive impairment, required extensive 2 person assist with bed mobility and personal care, total assist with transfers, was at risk for the development of pressure ulcers and did not have any unhealed pressure ulcers, The care plan dated 9/2/21 identified Resident #30 was at risk for skin breakdown due to decreased mobility, incontinence, and poor circulation. Interventions included consultation with wound care specialist as ordered/needed, follow all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,190 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-02-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to APPLE REHAB — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $510K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT