No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Apple Rehab Avon

220 Scoville Road, Avon, CT 06001 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (860) 673-3265 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (860) 673-3265 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2025$78,309 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $78,309 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-27)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
10 School St · (860) 675-1445 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
45 S Main St · (860) 675-9210 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1799 Farmington Avenue
Park
635 W Avon Rd · (860) 673-5696 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
590 W Avon Rd

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.8%18.0%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%6.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.0%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms38.8%22.3%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.8%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.1%16.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.4%17.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.9%4.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.6%24.7%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table27.6%17.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine38.0%69.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.2%24.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.2%10.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.562.061.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.121.461.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.0%CMS range 45.0–68.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.4–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.0–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
0.53
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.31
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.55
RN hoursweekends
55.2%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 51.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-25)
23
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure staff monitored the resident's whereabouts timely, and the resident was last observed by staff at approximately 6:30 PM and identified missing at 11:48 PM. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus and paranoid schizophrenia. Record review identified Resident #1 had a court appointed conservator for person (COP). Review of the Capacity to Meet Minimal Basic Needs assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 did not have the capacity to meet his/her minimal basic needs in the community. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of twelve out of fifteen (12/15), was cognitively intact, had no wandering behaviors and ambulated independently. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/15/26 identified a risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed ensure the Resident #1 was free from verbal mistreatment. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included major depression, end stage kidney disease and heart failure. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/14/2022 identified Resident #1 often refused treatments, hoarded items and refused out of bed. Interventions directed two (2) staff in attendance when providing care and encourage appropriate storage of items. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #1 was alert and oriented and required extensive assistance for bed mobility. A facility reportable event (RE) form dated 4/28/2022 identified an incident of staff-to-resident abuse without injury. The form identified on 4/17/2022, a staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure an employee was removed from the schedule after she was observed using inappropriate language. The findings include:Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included major depression, end stage kidney disease and heart failure. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/14/2022 identified Resident #1 often refused treatments, hoarded items and refused out of bed. Interventions directed two (2) staff in attendance when providing care and encourage appropriate storage of items. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #1 was alert and oriented and required extensive assistance for bed mobility. A facility reportable event (RE) form dated 4/28/2022 identified an incident of staff-to-resident abuse without injury.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of abuse/mistreatment timely, and the facility failed to ensure the State Agency was notified timely of an allegation of mistreatment after staff reported an allegation. The findings include:Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included major depression, end stage kidney disease and heart failure. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/14/2022 identified Resident #1 often refused treatments, hoarded items and refused out of bed. Interventions directed two (2) staff in attendance when providing care and encourage appropriate storage of items. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #1 was alert and oriented and required extensive assistance for bed mobility. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for bi-monthly narcotic audits, the facility failed to maintain and keep records of bi-monthly narcotic audits. The findings include: Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for bi-monthly narcotic audits, the facility failed to maintain and keep records of bi-monthly narcotic audits. The findings include: During the onsite review of the medication storage room on 9/25/25 at 12:29 PM, the most recent documented bi-monthly narcotic audit log was dated September 1, 2025. Observation of the bi-monthly narcotic audit logs identified the months for April 2025, May 2025, June 2025, July 2025, and August 2025 were not available. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DNS) on 9/25/25 at 1:56 PM identified that bi-monthly narcotic audit logs were not located prior to her start date in August 2025. Interview with the DNS on 9/25/25 at 2:45 PM identified the bi-monthly audit logs prior to September 2025 were completed by the previous DNS and could not be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on tour of the Dietary Department, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper hair covers were worn while in the kitchen, they also failed to ensure items in the kitchen were consistently dated and labeled. The findings include: The tour of the Dietary Department on 9/22/25 at 9:24 AM with the Director of Dietary identified the following:a. The Dietary Manager was observed with a full beard, standing over the food preparation area that contained a tray of uncovered ham, and carrots with no beard covering on to cover his beard. Interview with the Dietary Manager on 9/22/25 at 9:24 AM identified that a hair covering should be worn by all persons in the kitchen but did not provide a reason his beard was not covered while in the kitchen and near food. Facilities Dress Code Policy indicated in part that Hairnets or Hats must be work at all times, hair restraints must completely cover the hair line at all times, beard guards needed to be worn as appropriate. b. Observation on 9/22/25 at 9:32 AM with the Dietary Manager identified that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for mistreatment, the facility failed to ensure that the residents were free from a resident-to-resident altercation. The findings include: 1. Resident #20 's diagnoses included dementia with other behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder and depressed mood. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 was cognitively impaired, having behavioral history of rejecting evaluation or care. The MDS further identified Resident #20 required assistance for sit-to-stand transfers and supervision or touching assistance for bed mobility.The Resident Care Plan dated 6/27/24 identified Resident #20 could be physically and/or verbally aggressive toward staff members or other residents. Interventions included to approach Resident #20 slowly and from the front, attempt to involve Resident #20 in 1 to 1 recreational activity, be sure to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview for the only resident reviewed for edema (Resident #61), the facility failed to ensure staff submitted Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments timely. The findings include: Resident #61's diagnosis included heart failure, depression and Hypertension.A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #61 had moderate cognitive impairment.On 8/28/25 Resident #61 was admitted to the hospital.On 9/4/25 Resident #61 was readmitted to the facility.The facility scheduled and was in the process of completing an annual MDS assessment combined with a discharge return anticipated assessment when Resident #61 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. (The facility can complete assessments earlier but no later than 90 days after the date of the last assessment).On 9/24/25 at 9:40 AM an interview and MDS review with Registered Nurse (RN) #2 who completed the MDS', indicated the MDS assessments for Resident #61 had not been completed as of this date and were not completed timely:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documents, interviews and facility policy for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure weights were documented monthly according to physician orders. The findings include:Resident #24 's diagnoses included having a Stage 4 pressure ulcer to the sacrum, hypotension and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 24 was cognitively intact and was dependent with eating, oral hygiene and chair to bed transfer.The Resident Care Plan dated 7/3/25 identified Resident #24 did not have any behaviors of refusing care.A physician's order dated 10/1/24 directed to obtain Resident #24's weight on the first shower day of the month; every day shift starting on the 1st and ending on the 7th every month.Review of the monthly weights failed to identify monthly weights had been documented as physician ordered from May 2025 through September 2025.The Treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record and facility documentation, interviews and facility policy for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #61) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure supervision was provided in the bathroom, resulting in Resident #61 falling without injury. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff remained with food items while re-heating in a microwave to prevent the occurrence of smoke that required the activation of a code red and the fire alarm resulting in the fire department being dispatched. The findings include: 1. Resident #61's diagnosis included congestive heart failure, constipation, history of urinary tract infection and history of falls. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #61 had intact cognition and required partial/moderate assistance for toileting, upper/lower body dressing and personal hygiene. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #61 had a fall in the last month prior to admission and had 1 fall since the prior MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and review of the facility policy for the only resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #8), the facility failed to ensure that a resident on dialysis and with a fluid restriction had fluid intake consistently monitored and documented as per facility policy. The findings include: Resident #8's diagnoses included end-stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis.A physician order dated 6/13/25 directed a 1500 milliliter (ml) fluid restriction.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #8 was severely cognitively impaired, required partial/moderate assistance with oral hygiene and was dependent for toilet and personal hygiene. The MDS further identified Resident #8 was receiving dialysis since admission.A hydration risk assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #8 was on fluid restrictions and that intake and output (I&O's) had been initiated for at least 72 hours. A physician order dated 8/1/25 directed a 1500 ml…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documents, interviews and facility policy for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for unnecessary medication, the facility failed to ensure facility staff/pharmacy completed monthly medication reviews for 3 months. The findings include: Resident #32's diagnosis included Type 2 diabetes, depression, anxiety anemia hypothyroidism, hypertension and bipolar disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #32 received insulin injections, antidepressants, antianxiety medication, anticonvulsant medication, and hypoglycemic medications. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/13/24 indicated Resident #32 was at risk for adverse effects of hypothyroidism with interventions that included to provide medication and obtain lab work as ordered while observing for adverse signs and symptoms. The RCP also indicated Resident #32 was at risk for complications related to diabetes and the risk for low or elevated blood sugar levels.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for wound care, the facility failed to ensure the record was complete and accurate to include a verbal treatment order and failed to include timely documentation of wound care provided. The findings include:Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for wound care, the facility failed to ensure the record was complete and accurate to include a verbal treatment order and failed to include timely documentation of wound care provided. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included panniculectomy (removal of excess fat/skin in lower abdomen) during 2024, infection following surgical procedure and wound dehiscence (reopened). Physician order dated 7/7/2025 directed to change wound vac dressing three (3) times per week on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. The Resident Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #3) who were required supervision during meals, the facility failed to follow the physician's order and provide the one to one (1:1) supervision when food was delivered to Resident #3 to prevent a choking episode. The findings include: Resident #3's diagnoses included bipolar disorder, diabetes mellitus, asthma, depression and anxiety. The initial Resident Care Plan dated 2/7/25 identified non-compliance related to diet, drinking thin liquids when on a nectar thick liquid diet. Interventions directed to educate the resident on the importance of following the physician's order while respecting resident rights and observing any untoward effects of non-compliance, document and report to the provider. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had no memory recall deficits and required supervision with eating. The speech therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #6) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the State Agency was notified timely of an allegation of abuse. The findings include: Resident #6 was admitted with diagnoses that included borderline personality, post-traumatic stress disorder. A resident care plan (RCP) dated 7/25/2024 identified Resident #6 exhibited accusatory behaviors and poor impulse control towards staff's care. Interventions directed to approach in a clam manner, explain all procedures and medications before administering and do not engage if resident escalates or becomes accusatory. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had a BIMS of 15 meaning he/she was alert and oriented, and was independent with ALDs and mobility. A facility grievance form dated 8/25/2024 identified Resident #6 reported that the weekend supervisor had recorded her/him on his cell phone saying Resident #6 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for grievances, the facility failed to ensure interventions were put into place timely to prevent a wandering resident from entering another resident room. The findings include: Resident #1 had a diagnosis of dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment and used a wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/29/2024 identified Resident #1 had wandering behaviors. Interventions directed to redirect and engage in activities. Record review identified Resident #1 was self-mobile in a wheelchair. Resident #2's diagnoses included panic disorder, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 as alert and oriented and was independent with ADL care. The RCP dated 2/17/2024 identified PTSD, anxiety, and panic disorder. Interventions directed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #20, #36, #202, and #302) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan was completed in a timely manner. The findings include: 1. Resident # 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included spinal stenosis, chronic pain syndrome, and diabetes type 2. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 had intact cognition, spinal stenosis, lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, and polyneuropathy. Resident #20 had 2 care plans, one from dietary with a focus on obesity, not following diet at home, and the Activities Director with a focus on orientating to the facility with interventions that included a controlled carbohydrate diet, one to one visits and activities calendar activities introduced respectively. An interview with the DNS on 2/27/24 at 10:00AM identified it is her expectation that baseline care plans are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #25, #39 and Resident #202) reviewed for care planning,the facility failed to ensure quarterly care plan meetings were conducted, the facility failed to update the care plan reflecting the resident's preferences for provision of care and accusatory behaviors and the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan after falls. The findings include: 1. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included COPD, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. The resident care plan sign-in sheet identified care plan meetings with the IDT(inter discilplinary team ) , Resident #25, and his/her Resident Representative occurred on 5/20/22, 8/29/22, and 4/7/23. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #25's cognition was not assessed and was independent with personal hygiene, eating, and walking. The care plan dated 12/6/23 identified Resident #25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all licensed nurses( 27 ) were certified and had up to date Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) cards. The findings include: Review of the facility licensed nurses identified there is a total of 27 licensed nurses on staff (16 Registered Nurses and 11 Licensed Practical Nurses). Review of the CPR binder for licensed nurses identified 19 licensed nurses failed to have valid and up to date CPR cards. The facility had 8 out of 27 licensed nurses with valid and up to date CPR cards on file. Interview and facility documentation review with LPN #1 on [DATE] at 12:00 PM identified she has been employed by the facility since [DATE] as the Infection Preventionist, Staff Development, and Wound Nurse. LPN #1 indicated she had reviewed all licensed nurses CPR cards and was aware that 19 licensed nurses did not have valid and up to date CPR cards on file. LPN #1 indicated she had notified the DNS, Administrator, and RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 18 of 27 licensed nurses completed annual competencies related to providing Intravenous Therapy (IV) and the facility failed to ensure 14 of 27 licensed nurses had Intravenous Therapy (IV) certificates. The findings include: Review of the State Agency documentation identified the facility has a licensed bed capacity of 60 and an IV therapy program. 1. Review of the facility licensed nurses identified there is a total of 27 licensed nurses on staff (16 Registered Nurses and 11 Licensed Practical Nurses). Interview with LPN #1 on 2/26/24 at 9:15 AM identified she has been employed by the facility since 12/13/23 as the Infection Preventionist (IP), Staff Development, and the wound nurse with oversight from the DNS. Interview and facility documentation review with LPN #1 on 2/26/24 at 11:00 AM identified she was not aware that all licensed staff did not complete IV competencies for the year 2023. LPN #1 and the DNS indicated they were able to locate 9 out of 27 licensed nurse's competencies for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documents, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to complete performance reviews for 3 of 4 of the nurse aide personnel files reviewed every 12 months as required. The findings include: Facility document review of 4 NA personnel files identified the following: NA #3 personnel file identified she was hired in 2017 and no performance reviews were completed for years 2022 and 2023. NA #4 personnel filed identified he was hired in 2018 and no performance reviews were completed for years 2022 and 2023. NA #5 personnel file identified she was hired in 2013 and performance reviews were completed for year 4/15/23 (An exception rating was identified in 4 categories) no evaluation was completed for 2020, 2021, 2022. NA #6 personnel file identified she was hired 2019 and no performances reviews were completed for years 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023. Interview on 2/27/24 at 10:00AM with the DNS and Administrator identified they are aware performance reviews were not completed for 2023. The Administrator identified that she is implementing a plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 4 of 5 residents (Resident #21, Resident #352, Resident #4 and Resident #28) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure the narcotic destruction was performed per facility policy and the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside unsecure. The findings include: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included cancer, chronic pain, and diabetes. The care plan dated 7/12/23 identifies Resident #21 has moderate to severe pain. Interventions included medications as ordered by the physician. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #21 cognition and pain were not completed. 1. A physician's order dated 11/24/23 directed to apply 2 Fentanyl transdermal patch 100 mcg/hour and one Fentanyl 25 mcg/hour patch for a total of 225mcg/hour apply 3 patches transdermal every 72 hours for pain management and remove per schedule. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #18 and #302) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure resident was treated in a dignified manner and to ensure that the resident's rights related to personal hygiene were honored. The findings include: 1. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, urinary tract infections, right femur fracture and falls. A physician's order dated 1/30/24 directed to administer Lasix 20 mg every morning. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #18 had severely impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel and required total assistance with dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Additionally, had no behavior. The February 2024 care plan identified Resident #18 needs assistance for activities of daily living. Interventions included assisting as needed to meet toileting needs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #35) reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to invite the resident/resident representative to participate in the care plan meetings. The findings include: Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses which included transient ischemic attack (TIA), cerebral infarction, epilepsy, and dementia with psychotic disturbance. Review of the clinical record identified Resident #35 had an admission MDS dated [DATE], quarterly MDS dated [DATE], quarterly MDS dated [DATE], quarterly MDS dated [DATE], annual MDS dated [DATE], and a quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #35 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with bed mobility. Interview with Person #1 (Resident #35's representative) on 2/25/24 at 8:54 AM identified Resident #35 has been a resident at the facility since January 2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #21) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure resident has a right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident. The findings include: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cancer, chronic pain, diabetes, and sleep apnea. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #21 cognition was not completed and required no assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. The care plan (not dated) identifies Resident #21 requiresassist as need with toileting needs and if he/she declines a shower provide a full bed bath and honor his/her wishes. The Resident Care Card dated 1/11/24 identified Resident #21 was scheduled for a shower on Thursdays on the 7:00 AM -3:00 PM shift and required total assistance. A physician's order dated 11/24/23 directed to give a shower weekly on Thursdays…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #36 and Resident #302) reviewed for advanced directives, the facility failed to ensure that advance directives were reviewed and obtained from the resident and/or resident representative. The findings include: 1. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included malnutrition, gastrotomy, and diabetes. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #36 had intact cognition, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was fully dependent on staff for toileting, dressing, and bathing. The care plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #36 required assistance with ADLs. Interventions included advance directives per physician's orders. Review of the clinical record failed to identify any documentation or physician's orders related to advance directives for Resident #36. Interview with Resident # 36 on [DATE] at 8:36 AM identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #202) reviewed for medications, the facility failed to update the physician and resident representative of refusal of medications and new orders for medications in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #202 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. A physician's order dated 2/17/24 directed to administer Lispro insulin 3 units before meals, Olanzapine 2.5 mg twice a day, and Acetaminophen 975 mg three times a day. The nurse's note dated 2/17/24 at 5:04 AM identified Resident #202 was admitted to facility on 2/16/24 at 8:00 PM and was alert but confused and behavioral disturbances. The nurse's note dated 2/17/24 at 3:20 PM identified Resident #202 was alert with intermittent confusion. Resident #202 had increased agitation this afternoon and refused insulin and medications. Review of the MAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #39) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was reported to the state agency, in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, and cerebral infarction. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #39's cognition and mood were not assessed, and he/she required supervision or touching assistance with personal hygiene and was dependent with bathing. The care plan dated 1/16/24 identified Resident #39 had Parkinson's disease and was at risk for complications and injury related to muscle rigidity, dysphagia, fatigue, tremor, and as the disease progresses, he/she may also be at risk for memory and speech changes. Interventions included assisting Resident #39 to meet ADL needs and to be patient and encourage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #39) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure the abuse policy was followed regarding a staff member involved in an allegation of verbal abuse. The findings include: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, and cerebral infarction. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #39's cognition and mood were not assessed, and he/she required supervision or touching assistance with personal hygiene and was dependent with bathing. The care plan dated 1/16/24 identified Resident #39 had Parkinson's disease and was at risk for complications and injury related to muscle rigidity, dysphagia, fatigue, tremor, and as the disease progresses, he/she may also be at risk for memory and speech changes. Interventions included assisting Resident #39 to meet ADL needs and to be patient and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #39) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure the quarterly MDS and quarterly social work assessment were comprehensively completed. The findings include: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, and cerebral infarction. The social services assessment dated [DATE] was incomplete. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #39's cognition and mood were not assessed. The care plan dated 1/16/24 identified Resident #39 was taking opioid medication to help manage moderate to severe chronic pain. Interventions included monitoring for and reporting adverse effects including seizures, anxiety, agitation, hallucinations, and depression to the physician. The care plan further identified Resident #39 was at risk for potential adverse effects due to psychotropic medication use.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 6 residents (Resident # 20, #36) reviewed for comprehensive care planning, the facility failed to failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan. The findings include: 1. Resident # 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included spinal stenosis, chronic pain syndrome, and diabetes type 2. The admission MDS assessement dated 2/3/24 identified Resident #20 had intact cognition, spinal stenosis- lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, and polyneuropathy. Resident #20 had 2 care plans, one from dietary with a focus on obesity, not following diet at home with an intervention that included a controlled carbohydrate diet, and the second from the Activities Director with a focus on orientating to the facility with interventions that included one to one visits and calendar activities. An interview with the DNS on 2/27/24 at 10:00AM noted it is her expectation that comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #18 and #302) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure resident was provided the incontinent care timely and utilize briefs per standard of practice for (Resident #18) and the facility failed to ensure showers and personal hygeine needs were addressed for a newly admitted resident for (Resident #302). The findings include: 1. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, urinary tract infections, right femur fracture and falls. admission assessment dated [DATE] at 7:25 PM identified there were no marks or open areas to the coccyx, buttocks, and peri areas. A physician's order dated 1/30/24 directed to give Lasix 20 mg every morning. The care plan dated 2/1/24 identified Resident #18 needs assistance for activities of daily living. Interventions included assisting as needed to meet toileting needs and incontinent care per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included fracture of the right femur, dementia, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #18 had severely impaired cognition, required maximal assistance with sitting to standing and lying to sitting on the side of the bed, sustained 1 fall with no injury since admission, had an active diagnosis of heart failure, and taking a diuretic. The care plan dated 2/20/24 identified Resident #18 was a fall risk due to multiple risk factors including impaired balance, pain, and unsteady gait. Interventions included the provision of a well-lit and clutter free environment, maintaining commonly used articles within easy reach, and ensuring the call bell remains in reach. The nurse's note dated 2/2/24 at 6:46 AM identified Resident #18 experienced an unwitnessed fall at approximately 6:00 AM, resident denied hitting his/her head and denied pain. Vital signs were obtained. Skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, facility policies, and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to complete weekly body audits and weekly Braden scales per the physician's order and failed to ensure a nurse assessment was documented upon identification of a new pressure wound and (Resident #8) the facility failed to complete weekly body audits, per the physician's order. The findings include: 1.a Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, multiple sclerosis, and paraplegia. A Physician's order dated 7/3/23 directed to complete a body audit and Braden scale on shower days, every Monday, and document on the assessment tab. The quarterly MDS assessmet dated 11/22/23 identified Resident #5 had intact cognition, the presence of 1 stage 4 pressure ulcer, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and was dependent with toileting and bathing. The care plan dated 12/5/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #21) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for routine cleaning and maintenance of the Cpap. The findings include: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included cancer, chronic pain, diabetes, and sleep apnea. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #21 cognition was not completed and required no assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. Additionally, the MDS did not indicate Resident #21 utilized a Cpap. The November 2023 care plan did not identify the use of a Cpap. A physician's order dated 11/24/23 directed to apply Cpap at bedtime with a medium full-face mask at bedtime for sleep apnea, clean nasal and full-face mask with soap and water every morning, clean the non- disposable tubing with soap and water once daily on 7:00 AM-3:00 PM shift. Clean the headgear and masks every month on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 20) reviewed for pain management, the facility failed to ensure a prescribed narcotic analgesic was available for administration. The findings include: Resident # 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included spinal stenosis, chronic pain syndrome, and anxiety disorder. The admission MDS assessement dated2/3/24 identified Resident #20 had intact cognition, had spinal stenosis, lumbar region with neurogenic claudication, and polyneuropathy. Resident #20 did not have a care plan for pain, pain management or opioid use. A physician's order dated 2/1/24 directed to administer Hydromorphone 4mg (opioid pain analgesic) for pain every 3 hours as needed, Clonazepam(Klonopin) 0.5mg daily for anxiety, Lidocaine Patch 4% applied daily to lower back for pain, Carisoprodol(Soma) 350mg daily for back spasms, Tylenol 1000mg twice daily for pain, Pregabalin(Lyrica)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure the narcotic disposition record was accurate. The findings include: Resident #21 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cancer, chronic pain, and diabetes. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #21 did not reflect cognition and pain. A physician's order dated 11/24/23 directed to apply 2 Fentanyl transdermal patch 100 mcg/hour and one Fentanyl 25 mcg/hour patch for a total of 225mcg/hour apply 3 patches transdermal every 72 hours for pain management and remove per schedule. A physician's order dated 1/17/2024 directed for removal and destruction of Fentanyl patches with 2 licensed staff. A review of the controlled substance disposition records for Fentanyl Transdermal patch dated 11/30/23 through February 2024 identified that two nurse's were not consistently signing off on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 resident's(Resident #4 and Resident #21) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to sanitize the glucometer after use and store nebulizer tubing and CPAP face mask in a sanitary manner. The findings include: 1. Resident # 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with a readmission 2/23/24. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 4 had intact cognition, required substantial assistance with sitting to lying in the bed, and toileting. The MDS also identified Resident #4 had anxiety disorder and depression. The care plan dated 2/14/24 identified a concern with diabetes, with interventions which included fingerstick as ordered by the physician and as needed. A physician's order dated 2/4/24 directed to check blood glucose level twice daily at 6:00AM and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-27 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to designate a specific individual (with the required training and qualification) to oversee the infection control program between 7/2023 through 12/13/2023 (5 months and 2 weeks). The findings include: Interview with LPN #1 on 2/26/24 at 9:15 AM identified she has been employed by the facility since 12/13/23 as the Infection Preventionist (IP), staff development, and the wound nurse. LPN #1 indicated the DNS oversees her at this time. Interview with the DNS on 2/26/24 at 9:30 AM identified she has been in the DNS position for approximately 1 year. The DNS indicated she was aware of the facility not having a dedicated Infection Preventionist between 7/2023 until 12/13/23 (5 months and 2 weeks). The DNS indicated she had oversight of the the infection control program, the staff development, the wound program, supervisor at times, she worked on the floor as a nurse at times, and the DNS position until 12/13/23. The DNS indicated she had been overseeing the infection control program since LPN #6 had resigned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, observations, review of facility policy and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL), the facility failed to provide care per resident's preferences and in accordance with the plan of care. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and convulsions. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment and was required extensive assistance of two-person physical support for personal hygiene and transfers. The care plan identified the resident requires assistance with all ADL and mobility. Resident uses the following assistive devices: wheelchair. Interventions included for current function status: to provide total assist of 1 person with daily bathing/grooming/mouth care, to transfer the resident with the assistance of two people via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for one resident residents (Resident #11) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to assess the resident's nutritional status and failed to obtain a diet order from the physician upon admission and readmission from an acute care facility. The findings include: 1 a. Resident #11 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of shaft of humerus, left arm, status post closed reduction. A Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] noted Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] and placed on a regular diet, regular consistency with thin liquids. The nutritional care plan dated 7/16/21 and completed by the Registered Dietician (RD #1), identified Resident #11 required set assistance with meals. Interventions included: the provision of diet as ordered, to provide set-up assistance as needed and to encourage food/fluid intake. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], identified Resident # 11 was severely cognitively impaired, independent with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-10-01 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to test unvaccinated staff in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. The findings include: Review of facility documentation of Staff Vaccination Roster on 9/30/21 at 11:30 A.M. identified 6 staff members with an unvaccinated status related to medical or religious exemptions. The 6 staff members identified are: NA #2, NA #3, NA #4, NA #5, TRD and COTA #1. Interview with DNS and RN #2 on 9/30/21 at 11:35 A.M. identified that the facility was performing testing twice a week on unvaccinated staff. In accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Guidelines for Long Term Care Testing identified as of September 10, 2021 recommended an expanded screen testing of asymptomatic Healthcare Personnel (HCP) should be as follows: In nursing homes, unvaccinated HCP should continue to expanded screening testing based on the level of community transmission as follows: In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #235) reviewed for fall, the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for a resident who sustained a fall requiring transfer to an acute care facility for an evaluation and in accordance with facility policy. The findings include: Resident #235 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, systolic hypertension, sinus node dysfunction, pacemaker, and dementia. Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/24/21 identified Resident #235 was alert and confused and required assist of two with mobility and transfers. The physician's orders dated 9/24/21 directed the placement of an indwelling Foley catheter. The nursing progress note dated 9/26/21 at 4:56 A.M. identified Resident #235 was found lying on the bedroom floor at 4:30 A.M. which resulted in the resident's Foley catheter partially dislodged and noted bleeding and trauma.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #4) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure fall quarterly assessments were conducted in accordance with facility policy and the plan of care to prevent future falls. The findings include: Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease, adult failure to thrive and anemia. A Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] identified a score of 4 indicating Resident #4 was not at risk for falling. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 4 required supervised assist with bed mobility, transfers and locomotion in the room. The RCP dated 6/28/21 identified Resident #4 was at risk for falls. Interventions included: to have the call bell within reach when in bed or bedside chair, to encourage the resident to ask and wait for staff assistance for transfers and/or toileting, to reinforce need to use walker to ambulate independently in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-10-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, observations, review of facility policy and interviews for one out of thirty-three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for staffing, the facility failed to provide a sufficient number of personnel to meet the resident's needs. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, anxiety disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and convulsions. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment and was required extensive assistance of two-person physical support for personal hygiene and transfers. The care plan identified the resident requires assistance with all ADL and mobility. Resident uses the following assistive devices: wheelchair. Interventions included for current function status: to provide total assist of 1 person with daily bathing/grooming/mouth care, to transfer the resident with the assistance of two people via Hoyer lift and to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-11-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews for the only resident (Resident #32) reviewed for environment, the facility failed to ensure bureau drawer knobs were in place to ensure resident access to the use of a facility supplied bureau. The findings include: Resident #32's diagnosis included anxiety and depression. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #32 was cognitively intact and required set up or supervision for dressing, walking and wheeling the wheelchair. An observation and interview with Resident #32 on 9/22/25 at 11:11 AM noted two lower bureau drawers with the knobs missing and the screws exposed (sticking out) where the knobs once were, rendered the drawers unusable to the resident. An observation, interview and review of facility documentation with the Director of Maintenance on 9/25/25 at 1:45 PM indicated the unit Resident #32 resided on had older bureaus and nightstands and frequently the drawer knobs come off and had to be glued back on. The Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #15) reviewed for hospice services, the facility failed to accurately code the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to reflect Resident #15 receiving hospice services. The findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm (cancerous growth) of the breast, transient cerebral ischemic attack (temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain that causes stroke-like symptoms), aphasia (affects a person's ability to communicate), atrial fibrillation and dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #15 was severely cognitively impaired, required the assistance of 2 or more with toileting hygiene, showers, upper/lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and required maximal assistance with transfers. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #15 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$78,309 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $78,309 — penalty dated 2024-02-27
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-27 for 24 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to APPLE REHAB — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FOLEY, BRIANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR100%since 07/01/1982
SINGH, DEVIKAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/10/2018
VESS, RYANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/15/2013

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$757K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 9%Other / private 21%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $757K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$363per resident / day
operating cost
$11,041per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$332per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075388. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next