Apple Rehab Guilford
10 Boston Post Rd, Guilford, CT 06437 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (203) 453-3725 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.2% | 18.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 6.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.5% | 22.3% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.1% | 3.5% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.2% | 16.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.4% | 17.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.9% | 93.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 4.0% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.6% | 24.7% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.1% | 17.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 53.7% | 69.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.2% | 24.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.2% | 10.7% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 92 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.6%CMS range 41.1–60.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 6.5–12.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 3.3–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.86 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 78.4 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.20 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a resident was protected from mistreatment when Resident #1, with known intrusive and sexual behaviors was witnessed to touch Resident #3 inappropriately. The findings include:1. Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, adjustment disorder, and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eleven out of fifteen (11/15), indicative of moderately impaired cognition and ambulated independently. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/11/2025 identified Resident #1 had a history of verbally abusive and sexually inappropriate behaviors (2/12, 6/21 and 12/8/2024). Interventions directed to monitor behaviors, attempt to redirect, remove from public areas when behavior is disruptive/unacceptable and psychiatric follow-up as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for two of three residents (Resident #1 and #3) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency in a timely manner. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, adjustment disorder, and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eleven out of fifteen (11/15), indicative of moderately impaired cognition and ambulated independently. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/11/2025 identified Resident #1 had a history of verbally abusive and sexually inappropriate behaviors (2/12, 6/21 and 12/8/2024). Interventions directed to monitor behaviors, attempt to redirect, remove from public areas when behavior is disruptive/unacceptable and psychiatric follow-up as needed. 2. Resident #3's diagnoses included dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 4 residents (Resident #33, 45, 70 and 85) the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice. For 3 of 3 residents, (Resident #33, 45 and 85), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were completed according to the facility policy after the residents fell either without a witness or had a head strike, and for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #70) who were at risk for the development of pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure the LAL (low air loss) mattress was set according to the manufacturer recommendations, and failed to ensure the Braden Scale and the weekly body audits were completed per facility policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility in May 2019 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, psychotic disorder with delusions and hallucinations, and repeated falls. A physician's order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were routinely monitored prior to food service. The findings include: The facility's Cooked Foods Temperature Chart identified food temperatures must be documented when the food item completes the cooking process; supper food items included soup, meat, puree meat, ground meat, potato/starch, puree starch, vegetable, puree vegetable, and other. Review of the Cooked Foods Temperature Charts dated 12/17/24 through 1/4/25 and 1/12/25 through 2/22/25 failed to identify supper temperatures were documented on the following dates: 12/18/24 only soup and meat temperatures were documented, 12/25/24, 12/27/24, 12/30/24, 12/31/24 1/3/25, 1/4/25, 1/13/25, 1/14/25, 1/16/25, 1/18/25, 1/20/25, 1/24/25, and 1/30/25. The Cooked Foods Temperature Charts were not provided between 1/5/25 through 1/11/25. The facility's Meal Serving Temperature Chart identified serving temperatures must be taken no earlier than 10 minutes prior to meal service; supper food items included soup,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #17) reviewed for advance directive, the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident representatives wishes for an advance directive/code status (code status refers to the level of medical interventions a person wishes to have started if their heart or breathing stops) were obtained and implemented. The findings include: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in January 2021 with diagnoses that included dementia and Wernicke's encephalopathy. A Transfer Discharge Report dated 1/7/21 identified Resident #17 was transferred from another facility with a code status (code status refers to the level of medical interventions a person wishes to have started if their heart or breathing stops) of full code (full code directs the medical team to take all possible measures to save the residents' life in the event of a medical emergency). The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 3 residents (Resident #16, 54, and 85) the facility failed to notify the physician and/or the resident representative with a change in condition. For Resident #16, reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure the Psychiatric APRN was immediately notified when the resident that expressed suicidal ideation, for Resident #54, reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure the resident representative was notified of a weight loss and the implementation of a supplement, and for Resident #85, reviewed as a closed record, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified following an unwitnessed fall. The findings include. 1. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included post-traumatic stress disorder, mood disorder due to known physiological condition with mixed features, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #16 had intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR), the facility failed to notify the State-designated authority when the resident received a new psychiatric diagnosis. The findings include: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility in May 2019 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, depression, anxiety, and repeated falls. The admission PASARR dated 5/1/19 determination date 5/30/19 identified Resident #33 had no major mental disorder, did not have dementia, Alzheimer's, or psychotic/delusional disorder. The outcome was Resident #33 was approved for long term care for skilled nursing care. Resident #33 is reported to be occasionally disoriented in situations, with deficits noted in memory and judgment at this time. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #33 had severely impaired cognition, and a diagnosis of depression and anxiety. The MDS did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #14) who were at risk to develop a pressure ulcer, the facility failed to ensure the Braden Scale and the weekly body audits were done per the physician's order and failed to ensure the LAL (low air loss) mattress was set per the manufacturer recommendations. The findings include: Resident #14 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fibromyalgia, delirium, and stroke. The admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 was noted to have an open area to the top of the coccyx that measured 3.0cm by 3.0cm by 2.0 with a 2.25 cm depth. Further, the assessment indicated the resident had a urinary catheter. A physician's order dated 5/27/23 directed to complete a Braden Scale on admission and every week for 4 weeks. The care plan dated 6/13/23 identified Resident #14 had a stage III pressure injury to the sacrum. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident, (Resident #34) reviewed for range of motion, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and use of adaptive devices was provided in accordance with the plan of care and failed to ensure a physician's order was maintained that directed the use of an adaptive device for a resident with limited mobility. The findings include: Resident #4 had diagnoses that included hemiplegia/hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis) following a stroke affecting the right side and was receiving hospice services. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had severely impaired cognition, had mobility impairment to one side of the body and was dependent with dressing. The care plan dated 1/14/25 (original date 2/16/23) identified Resident #34 was at risk for contractures of the right hand related to right hemiparesis. Interventions included applying a resting hand splint after morning care, remove…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents, (Resident #5) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained according to policy. The findings include: Resident #5 had diagnoses that included history of a heart attack and recent influenza. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had moderately impaired cognition and was independent with eating. The care plan dated 10/16/24 identified Resident #16 had a potential for nutritional decline related to multiple medical problems. Interventions included to provide diet, supplements and weight as ordered. Physician's order dated 11/14/24 directed to obtain weekly weights. The weight log dated 11/27/24 identified Resident #5 weighed 121.2 lbs. A Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #5 experienced no significant weight change in the past one or six months, had mostly good intake with house supplements in place to help meet needs. A Nutritional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 residents, (Resident #25 and 37) reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to develop and implement policies to ensure a resident with a history of colonized multidrug resistant organism (MDRO) and a surgical wound was provided care in accordance with infection control practices and failed to implement policies regarding the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing direct care and for Resident #37 the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were initiated for a resident with an indwelling medical device. The findings include: 1. Resident #25 had diagnoses that included cutaneous abscess of the groin requiring aftercare following surgery. The care plan dated 1/21/25 identified Resident #25 had a surgical wound, and a history colonized Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA (bacteria resistant to many antibiotics) requiring advanced barrier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from abuse when care was not stopped upon resident request. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic pain, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking and anxiety disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was cognitively intact, exhibited no behaviors and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and total assistance for transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/30/24 identified that Resident #1 required staff assistance with interventions that included to assist as needed to meet toileting needs, incontinent care per policy and side rails per policy to assist with bed mobility. Review of the Concern Form (grievance) dated 5/3/24 and signed by the Social Worker and Administrator, identified that Resident #1 complained about care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents #1 and #2), reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the State Agency was notified timely of allegations of abuse or neglect. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic pain, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking and anxiety disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was cognitively intact, exhibited no behaviors and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and total assistance for transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/30/24 identified that Resident #1 required staff assistance with interventions that included to assist as needed to meet toileting needs, incontinent care per policy and side rails per policy to assist with bed mobility. Review of the Concern Form (grievance) dated 5/3/24 and signed by the Social Worker and Administrator identified that Resident #1 complained about care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse and neglect and failed to ensure an alleged accused staff member was removed from the schedule timely to ensure residents were protected from potential abuse. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic pain, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking and anxiety disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was cognitively intact, exhibited no behaviors and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and total assistance for transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/30/24 identified that Resident #1 required staff assistance with interventions that included to assist as needed to meet toileting needs, incontinent care per policy and side rails per policy to assist with bed mobility. Review of the Concern Form (grievance) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three residents (Residents #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to follow a physician's order directing staff assistance of two (2) for care. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic pain, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking and anxiety disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was cognitively intact, exhibited no behaviors and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and total assistance for transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/30/24 identified that Resident #1 required staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Interventions included to assist as needed to meet toileting needs, incontinent care per policy and side rails per policy to assist with bed mobility. Review of the Concern Form (grievance) dated 5/3/24 and signed by the Social Worker and Administrator, identified that Resident #1 complained about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect, the facility failed to ensure the residents were provided social services support timely after an allegation of abuse/neglect. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic pain, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking and anxiety disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was cognitively intact, exhibited no behaviors and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and total assistance for transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/30/24 identified that Resident #1 required staff assistance. Interventions included to assist as needed to meet toileting needs, incontinent care per policy and side rails per policy to assist with bed mobility. Review of the Concern Form (grievance) dated 5/3/24 and signed by the DNS and Administrator identified that Resident #1 complained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview for one of three residents (Resident #7) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate to include vital signs and neurological assessments after an unwitnessed fall. The findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 had severe cognitive impairment and required staff assistance with ADLs and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/27/2024 identified Resident #7 required assistance with ADLs, transfers and was impulsive. Interventions directed to assist with ADLs, and transfers, and to avoid information overload. Facility incident report dated 7/12/2024 at 10:45 PM identified Resident #7 was found on the floor by the bed by the maintenance staff (unwitnessed fall), and stated he/she had tried to get up alone. Resident #7 was awake, alert, able to stand with assistance, had no bruises…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who was on a modified diet consistency due to missing teeth causing increased difficulty with chewing, the facility failed to ensure the resident was not served the wrong diet consistency of fruit to prevent the resident from choking. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 required set up assistance for eating. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was discharged to the facility on a regular diet. The hospital occupational therapy evaluation dated 8/2/24 identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, time, and situation but disoriented to place. The evaluation indicated Resident #1 was completely independent with eating. The diet slip presented to the kitchen dated 8/5/224 identified Resident #1 was on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a clean and comfortable homelike environment. The findings include: Observations on 10/17/22 at 10:40 AM through 11:40 AM, and on 10/17/22 at 2:18 PM with the Maintenance Supervisor, and the Housekeeping Manager identified the following issues: a. Damaged, chipped and/or marred bedroom walls on [NAME] unit in rooms 5, and 16. [NAME] unit in rooms 21, 22, 24, 28, 29, 31, and 32. East River unit in rooms 35, 36, 38, and 49. b. Damaged, chipped, rusty, and/or marred door frames in the bathroom on [NAME] unit in rooms 1, shower room. [NAME] unit in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. East River unit in room [ROOM NUMBER]. c. Damaged, holes, chipped and/or marred doors in the bathroom on [NAME] unit in room [ROOM NUMBER], and 29. d. Damaged, chipped and/or marred bedroom radiator on [NAME] unit in rooms 7, and 11. [NAME] unit in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. e. Stains, discoloration, dirt, debris, and/or wax build up on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #20) reviewed for physician notification, the facility failed to notify the physician when the resident refused ordered bloodwork. The findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, left ankle deformity, major depression, and anxiety. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 had severely impaired cognition, was occasionally incontinent of bladder and continent of bowel and required supervision with dressing and personal hygiene. Resident #20 was independent with transfers, ambulation in the room and hallway with a rolling walker. The care plan dated 7/25/22 identified Resident #20 had dementia with physical and/or verbal aggression towards staff and other residents. Interventions included to provide a psychiatric evaluation. A physician's order dated 8/1/22 directed on the next lab day to draw a Valproic Acid level…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for abuse, (Resident #15 and Resident #379), the facility failed to ensure that the residents from mistreatment. The findings include: 1. Resident #15 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included anxiety disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and depression. The Care Plan dated 7/26/22 identified Resident #15 had an impairment in mobility and weakness requiring assistance with his/her activities of daily living (ADL's) with interventions that included to encourage Resident #15 to complete as much of his/her care as possible, to offer assistance only after he/she had attempted to complete the task his/herself and offer to assist Resident #15 with tasks he/she is unable to complete. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #15 had no impairment in cognition, no identified behaviors, was an extensive assist for bed mobility, and independent for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #79) reviewed for discharge planning, the facility failed to communicate with the home care agency including providing the discharge packet information. The findings include: Resident #79 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included fracture of the right tibia, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and stroke. The care plan, undated, identified included interventions to establish a discharge plan with Resident #79 and the family, evaluate progress and revise plan as needed. Additionally, social services will facilitate discharge planning when appropriate. A physician's order dated 6/29/22 directed to transfer using a mechanical lift. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #79 had severely impaired cognition, had an indwelling catheter, was frequently incontinent of bowel, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #70) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to follow the bed hold policy. The findings include: Resident #70 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of the lung and brain, chronic kidney disease, and heart disease. The baseline care plan dated 9/28/22 identified the resident had cancer with metastasis. Interventions included to assist with arranging oncology appointments. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #70 had intact cognition and required supervision with dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and transfers. The nurse's note dated 10/4/22 at 7:52AM identified that Resident #70's white blood count was 41.1mcL (normal range is between 3,500 and 10,500 mcL). Subsequent to APRN notification, the resident was sent to the emergency room. Interview with the DNS on 10/18/22 at 10:19 AM indicated there should be a packet for transfer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #20) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure elopement risk evaluation assessments were completed per the policy. The findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, left ankle deformity, major depression, and anxiety. The nurse's note dated 2/7/21 at 4:55 AM identified Resident #20 was wandering the halls for a few hours during the night and was easily redirected. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 had severely impaired cognition, required supervision for dressing and toilet use, was independent with transfers, ambulation in the room and hallway with a walker and wandering behavior was not exhibited. The Annual Elopement Risk Evaluation was not completed for 2/19/21. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident # 20 had severely impaired cognition, required supervision for dressing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #79) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team and Resident #79 were involved with the discharge planning process. The findings include: Resident #79 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included fracture of the right tibia, multiple sclerosis, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, and stroke. The care plan, undated, identified included interventions to establish a discharge plan with Resident #79 and the family, evaluate progress and revise plan as needed. Additionally, social services will facilitate discharge planning when appropriate. A physician's order dated 6/29/22 directed to transfer using a mechanical lift. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #79 had severely impaired cognition, had an indwelling catheter, was frequently incontinent of bowel, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #20 and 64) reviewed unnecessary medications, the facility failed to follow the physicians' orders regarding bloodwork and medications. The findings include: 1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, left ankle deformity, major depression, and anxiety. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 had severely impaired cognition, was occasionally incontinent of bladder and continent of bowel and required supervision with dressing and personal hygiene. Resident #20 was independent with transfers, ambulation in the room and hallway with a rolling walker. The care plan dated 7/25/22 identified Resident #20 had dementia with physical and/or verbal aggression towards staff and other residents. Interventions included to provide a psychiatric evaluation. The psychiatric APRN note dated 8/1/22 (follow up visit)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews, for 1 resident (Resident #47) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed ensure medications were not left at the resident ' s bedside unsecured. The findings include: Resident #47 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease and Parkinson's disease. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #47 had intact cognition, required limited assistance for mobility utilizing a rolling walker or wheelchair. The care plan dated 9/19/22 identified Resident #47 was at risk for skin breakdown with interventions that included to keep the skin clean and dry and apply barrier cream with incontinent care. Physician orders dated 9/30/22 directed to apply Ammonium Lactate Lotion 12% to legs topically every day and evening shift, and Capsaicin Cream 0.1% apply to legs topically at bedtime for feet pain. Observation on 10/16/22 at 1:03 PM identified Resident #47 had the following medications at the bedside on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, the facility assessment, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nurse aide staffing. The findings include: Review of facility documentation identified the total capacity of the facility is 86, thre was a census of 81 on 10/16/22 and the 3 units with the following capacity was provided. East River Capacity 32. [NAME] Capacity 26. [NAME] Capacity 28. Review of the facility assessment dated 6/2022 identified the facility requires 7 nurse aides on the 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM shift, and 4 nurse aides on the 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shift. Staffing assignments are reviewed regularly in relation to resident needs and adjusted as needed, staff assignments are based on the resident acuity rather than numbers. Review of the staffing schedules dated 10/8/22 - 10/18/22 for the 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM shifts identified the following. Saturday 10/8/22; 3.5 nurse aides . Sunday 10/9/22; 5 nurse aides. 10/10/22; 4 nurse aides. 10/11/22; 4 nurse aides. 10/14/22; 6.5 nurse aides.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, the facility assessment, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff working as a nurse aide had current certification and competencies necessary to provide nursing and related services. The finding included: Review of the facility staff schedule dated 10/8/22 through 10/18/22 identified the facility had been utilizing a Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA #1) as a nurse aide on the 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM shift, and hospitality aides as nurse aides on the 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM and 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shifts. Interview with the DNS on 10/19/22 at 7:40 AM identified she is aware that the facility did not have sufficient nurse aide staffing on the 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM and 11:00 PM - 7:00 AM shifts and they have been utilizing a COTA and hospitality aides on the floors as direct care nurse aides. The DNS indicated the facility does not have a scheduler and that she has been the doing the schedule. The DNS indicated she was not aware that she cannot utilized the COTA as a nurse aide on the unit and she was not aware that the hospitality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident, (Resident #63) reviewed for pharmacy services, the facility failed to notify the physician when a medication was unavailable from the pharmacy and therefore not administered to Resident #63. The findings include: Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 6:18 PM with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A Discharge Hospital After Visit Summary (medication list) dated 3/15/19 identified Lidocaine patch 3.6-1.25 % daily (last administered on 3/15/19 at 9:59 AM). The admission physician orders dated 3/15/19 directed Lidocaine Menthol 3.6-1.25% patch-one patch on skin every day. Review of the MAR dated 3/16/19 through 3/18/19 (date of Resident #63's discharge) failed to identify the Lidocaine patch was applied to Resident #63 (3 days). Interview with the DNS on 12/30/19 at 2:15 PM indicated the Lidocaine patch was out of stock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview for one sampled resident (Resident #64), reviewed for an injury of unknown origin, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency. The findings include: Resident #64's diagnoses include dementia and Parkinson's disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #64 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two for bed mobility and toilet use. The Resident Care Plan that was initiated 1/3/18 and currently in effect indicated Resident #64 had a risk of bruising/bleeding and taking blood thinning medication. Nurse's notes dated 6/13/19 at 10:01 PM indicated Resident #64 was found in bed with a bruise to the back of the right hand measuring 6 (centimeters) cm by 5 cm, dark purple blue in color. Resident #64 was unable to state the cause, the Supervisor notified. Try to find reason, no blood draw as record. Accident/Incident report filed. Family member noticed. Leave note for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview for one sampled resident (Resident #64), reviewed for an injury of unknown origin, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin. The findings include: Resident #64's diagnoses include dementia and Parkinson's disease. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #64 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two for bed mobility and toilet use. The Resident Care Plan that was initiated 1/3/18 and currently in effect indicated Resident #64 had a risk of bruising/bleeding and taking blood thinning medication. Nurse's notes dated 6/13/19 at 10:01 PM indicated Resident #64 was found in bed with a bruise to the back of the right hand measuring 6 (centimeters) cm by 5 cm, dark purple blue in color. Resident #64 was unable to state the cause, the Supervisor notified. Try to find reason, no blood draw as record. Accident/Incident report filed. Family member noticed. Leave note for APRN to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #13) observed with medication at the bedside, the facility failed to administer medication according to professional standards of practice. The findings include: Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, heart failure, respiratory failure, pulmonary hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Physician's order dated 10/4/19 directed to administer Potassium Chloride 40 Milliequivelants (Meq) by mouth daily. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #13 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of 1 for bed mobility, transfers, and mobility on/off unit. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/9/19 identified Resident #13 was on medication therapy, with interventions that included to administer medications as ordered. Resident #13's December Medication Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one resident (Resident #14) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to consistently ambulate a resident who was on an ambulation program and dependent on staff to walk. The findings include: Resident #14 diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, major depression, and above the knee amputation of the right leg. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/18/18 and currently in effect (but not dated) identified Resident #14 required assistance with activities of daily living. Interventions included to ambulate Resident #14 daily with a gait belt and rolling walker, to the 1st annex out cove with modified independence and to set up a chair at the nurse's station for rest periods. A quarterly Physical Therapy Screening form dated 10/1/19 identified Resident #14 was seen for a functional maintenance ambulation screen and remained appropriate for the ambulation program and continued to participate. The quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #63)reviewed for pharmacy services, the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained and administered timely. The findings include: Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 6:18 PM with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A Discharge Hospital After Visit Summary (medication list) dated 3/15/19 identified your medications have changed and start taking Eliquis 5 milligrams (mg) every 12 hours (last administered on 3/15/19 at 9:50 AM and due to be administered in the evening on 3/15/19) , Cardizem 180 mg once daily (last administered on 3/15/19 at 9:50 AM), Famotidine 20 mg daily (last administered on 3/15/19 at 9:50 AM), Ferrous Sulfate 65 mg twice daily (last administered on 3/15/19 at 9:50 AM and due to be administered in the evening on 3/15/19), Furosemide 40 mg twice daily (last administered on 3/15/19 at 9:50 AM and due to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for unnecessary medication, the facility failed to monitor orthostatic blood pressures as per physician orders. The findings include: Resident #36 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, ischemic heart disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, anemia, embolism, thrombosis of superficial veins of lower extremity and intellectual disability. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #36 had moderate cognitive impairment and required limited assistance of 1 for bed mobility, transfers, walking in room, and dressing. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #36 required extensive assistance of one for toilet use and personal hygiene. A physician's re-admission order dated 11/2/19 directed to administer Hydralazine (a vasodilator) 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 8 hours. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-01-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #44) observed during medication administration, the facility failed to the ensure a medication administration error rate was less than 5%. The findings include: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, bipolar disorder, and acute kidney failure. A physician's order dated 11/20/19 directed to administer Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) enteric coated delayed release (EC) tablet by mouth once a day, Divalproex (Depakote) 250 mg Extended Release(ER) by mouth once daily, and may crush appropriate meds and place in food or fluid as needed. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #44 had moderately impaired cognition, required total dependence of two with activities of daily living (ADL), bed mobility and transfers, did not identify a swallowing disorder or dental disorder at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 3 residents, (Resident #46 and 74) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to provide notice of bed-hold policy upon a hospital transfer specifying the duration of a bed-hold. The findings include: 1. Resident #46 had diagnoses that included type II diabetes, atrial fibrillation an history of acute kidney failure. The admission clinical record identified Resident #46 was self-responsible. Annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #46 had moderate cognitive impairment. Facility documentation identified Resident #46 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 10/10/24, 11/21/24 through 12/1/24 and 12/10/24 through 12/13/24. Review of the clinical record failed to identify that a notice of bed-hold policy was provided to the resident upon each of the 3 transfers to the hospital. Interview and review of the clinical record with RN #7 on 2/25/25 at 12:17 PM identified the charge nurse or nursing supervisor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2022-10-19 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified, in writing, when the resident was transferred and admitted to the hospital. The findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and large B-cell lymphoma intra-abdominal lymph nodes. Review of the census form dated 5/22/22 identified Resident #6 was transferred to the hospital. A nurse's note dated 5/23/22 at 3:41 PM identified Resident #6 arrived back to the facility at 2:45 PM. Review of the census form dated 8/20/22 identified Resident #6 was transferred to the hospital and admitted . A nurse's note dated 8/30/22 at 10:38 PM identified Resident #6 readmitted to the facility at 5:15 PM with diagnoses that included upper gastrointestinal bleed and enlarging AAA (Abdominal Aorta Aneurysm) - repaired on 8/24/2022. Review of the census form dated 9/21/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to APPLE REHAB — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FOLEY, BRIAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 09/28/1984 |
| SINGH, DEVIKA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/10/2018 |
| VESS, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/15/2013 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075144. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.