No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hewitt Health & Rehabilitation Center, INC

45 Maltby Street, Shelton, CT 06484 · For profit - Individual · 206 certified beds · (203) 924-4671 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (203) 924-4671 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 actual-harm citation$8,018 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,018 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-01)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
78 Pershing Dr · (860) 650-3848 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
74 Pershing Dr · (203) 734-9455 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
70 Wooster St · (203) 924-2559 · Call to confirm hours
Park
54 Hill St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.3%18.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.9%6.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.1%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms39.6%22.3%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.5%16.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.0%17.6%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine68.5%93.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.4%4.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%24.7%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.6%17.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine25.0%69.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.9%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.5%10.7%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 83 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.7%CMS range 47.7–68.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 8.2–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.4–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
40.2%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 206 beds and averages 113.9 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 92 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-19)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for falls, (Resident #1 and Resident #2), the facility failed to ensure a safety device was utilized for transfers and ambulation in accordance with facility policy resulting in falls with injuries. The findings include: 1. Resident #2 had diagnoses that included dementia and osteoporosis. A physician's order dated 3/7/24 directed an assist of one for transfers with rolling walker. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for transfers. The care plan dated 4/25/24 identified Resident #2 had multiple risk factors for falls such as deconditioning, unsteady gait, and poor safety awareness with interventions that included to transfer Resident #2 in accordance with physician's orders. A nurse's note written by Registered Nurse (RN) #1 dated 6/1/24 at 12:19 PM identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to ensure the provider was notified at the time a change in behavioral symptoms was noted. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, anxiety, major depressive disorder, centrilobular emphysema (damage to the air sacs in the center area of the lungs which can spread outwards and leads to difficulty breathing and reduced oxygen supply to the bloodstream) and congestive heart failure. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/9/25 identified Resident #1 had chronic progressive decline in intellectual functioning characterized by deficit in memory, judgment, decision making and thought process' related to dementia with psychotic disturbances, displayed inappropriate behavior and at times refused to wear supplemental oxygen, refused medication and could be resistive to care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-05-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) submissions, the facility failed to provide the appropriate number of weekend staff for Quarter 1 and Quarter 2 of Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 (October 1, 2023 through March 31, 2024). The findings include: PBJ submissions for Quarter 1 and Quarter 2 of FY 2024 (October 1, 2023 through March 31, 2024). indicated the facility had triggered for excessively low weekend staffing. An interview with the Scheduler on 5/16/25 at 9:36 AM identified she was not responsible for submitting staffing reports to PBJ and was not aware that the facility had triggered for low weekend staffing for Quarters 1 and 2 of FY 2024. The Scheduler indicated weekend staffing during that time was a challenge due to nursing staff calling out for their schedule shifts, retainment of staff, and agency staff calling out before scheduled shifts. The Scheduler identified more staff have been hired, retainment of staff is better, and they rarely need to call agency staff to help with covering scheduled shifts. Interview with the HR coordinator at 05/16/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 4 of 32 residents (Resident #31, Resident #94, Resident #214 and Resident #315) reviewed for Advance Directives, the facility failed to follow facility policy for completion of resident's choices for advance directives. The findings include: 1. Resident #31's diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, malignant neoplasm of the kidney, and lymphedema. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #31 was cognitively intact and was independent with eating, bed mobility and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated [DATE] identified Resident #31 required staff assistance with his/her activities of daily living. Interventions included Advance Directives per resident/representative and per physician orders and please ensure Resident #31 was accompanied to medical appointments as necessary. Review of Resident #31's clinical record on [DATE] at 9:47 AM failed to identify a Medical Interventions Consent Form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #1, Resident #53, Resident #78 and Resident #85) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to notify the resident representative (Resident #1, Resident #53 and Resident #78) and failed to notify the physician (Resident #85) of a weight loss. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included dementia, depression, and anemia. Review of the face sheet in the clinical record identified Resident #1 was not responsible for him/herself and a family member was the resident representative. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/7/24 identified Resident #1 had the potential for a nutritional decline related to multiple medical diagnoses and the need for an altered consistency diet. Interventions included to provide fortified foods as ordered, provide supplements as ordered, and offer different foods and fluids. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #6, Resident #98, and Resident #110) reviewed for smoking, the facility failed to ensure timely completion of smoking assessments, to secure smoking materials per the resident plan of care (Resident #6), and failed to provide supervision to a resident smoking (Resident #6) per the smoking assessment. The findings include: 1. Resident #6's diagnoses included end stage heart failure, asthma, and acquired absence of the left leg. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 was cognitively intact and was independent with toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #6 used a motorized wheelchair and was not ambulatory. Additionally, the sections of the MDS identifying tobacco use was not completed. An admission smoking assessment dated [DATE] at 10:01 PM identified Resident #6 wanted to smoke but did not have the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-05-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #264) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a medication was administered as indicated by the physician's order which resulted in Resident #264 receiving a psychotropic medication. The findings include: Resident #264's diagnoses included autistic disorder, developmental disorder, and unspecified convulsions. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #264 was severely cognitively impaired and required partial/moderate assistance with bed mobility and was dependent with toileting and transfers. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #264 received antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant and anticonvulsant medications. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/7/25 identified a seizure disorder with interventions that included to administer medications as ordered. A physician's order dated 5/7/25 directed Lorazepam (a psychotropic medication) 1 mg by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency (SA) timely. The findings include: Resident #18's diagnoses included dementia, anemia, and non-thrombocytopenic purpura. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #18 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent for transfers, toileting, and bed mobility. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/15/25 identified skin issues and skin breakdown related to venous ulcers and skin tears. Interventions included to inspect skin when providing care and gentle handling during all care. Observation on 5/12/25 at 12:30 PM identified Resident #18 was in bed and his/her right upper extremity, which was partially outside of the bed covers, had a large area of light purple colored bruising to the top of the hand and wrist area. The skin of the exposed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for pressure injury, and 1 of 3 residents (Resident #264) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to ensure completion of an Registered Nurse (RN) assessment after a resident fell (Resident #44) and the identification of a new pressure ulcer (Resident #264). The findings include: 1. Resident #44's diagnoses included dementia, fibromyalgia, and anxiety. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/1/24 identified Resident #44 was at risk for skin breakdown due to decreased mobility, incontinence, poor nutrition and poor circulation. Interventions included offer and/or encourage Resident #44 to reposition as needed, provide incontinent care as needed, and check Resident #44's skin weekly with scheduled bath/shower. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #44 was moderately cognitively impaired and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-05-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, for the only sampled resident (Resident #21) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to maintain clean and trimmed fingernails. The findings include: Resident #21's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the right dominant side, dementia, and end stage renal disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #21 was severely cognitively impaired and dependent with transfers, toileting and personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/11/25, identified Resident #21 had a history of a stroke with hemiparesis (partial paralysis or weakness of the right side) and needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's). Interventions included to anticipate and meet the residents needs and to provide daily skin care and hygiene. Review of the nurse aide (NA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #85) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to weigh the resident per physician orders. The findings include: Resident #85's diagnosis included congestive heart failure, pleural effusion, and cardiomyopathy. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #85 had intact cognition, and was independent with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, upper/lower body dressing and personal hygiene. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #85 had no significant weight loss and had a diagnoses of heart failure. A physician order dated 12/1/24 directed for Resident #85 to be weighed daily. Review of the weight record from 12/1/24 to 5/15/25 identified a daily weight was not obtained 38 times out of 166 occasions. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/3/25 identified Resident #85 was at risk for cardiac issues with interventions weight as ordered/per policy, watch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record and policy reviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #106) sampled for pressure injuries, the facility failed to provide treatment for a wound per physician's order and failed to transcribe wound orders accurately. The findings included: Resident #106's diagnoses included a stage 3 pressure ulcer of the sacral region, muscle weakness and osteomyelitis of vertebral, sacral and sacrococcygeal region. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #106 was cognitively intact, and required substantial/maximal assistance for dressing, toileting and changing position in bed. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #106 had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer defined as full thickness loss, with subcutaneous fat visible but bone, tendon or muscle was not exposed. Slough was present but did not obscure the depth of tissue loss, may include undermining and tunnelling. The Resident Care Plan dated 3/12/25 identified Resident #106 had a pressure ulcer or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to administer medications per the physician's order resulting in a medication error rate greater than 5%. The findings include: Resident #25's diagnoses included dementia, atrial fibrillation and history of venous thrombus and embolism (blood clot). The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #25 was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility and toileting and was dependent with transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 3/6/25 identified constipation and a history of deep vein thrombosis (blood clot). Interventions included to administer medications as ordered and initiate bowel regimen as per the physician's orders. A physician's order dated 5/1/25 directed to administer Aspirin EC 81mg by mouth one time a day for atrial fibrillation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation(s), review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for skin condition (non-pressure), and for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #106) reviewed for pressure injury, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) were donned ( placed on ) during wound care for a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during wound care. The findings include: 1. Resident #18's diagnoses included dementia, anemia, and non-thrombocytopenic purpura. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #18 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent for transfers, toileting, and bed mobility. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #18 had venous/arterial ulcers and skin tears. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/15/25 identified venous ulcers and a skin tear to the lower extremities and EBP related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #2) who were reviewed for an accident, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had Geri-leg sleeves applied per the physician's order to prevent a left leg laceration that required sutures and steri-strips. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease without dyskinesia, dementia, psychotic disorder, muscle weakness and history of falls. A physician order dated 9/2/24 directed to apply Geri-legs on Resident #2's legs in the morning and remove at night. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven (7) out of fifteen (15) indicting severe cognitive impairment and Resident #2 required extensive one (1) person assistance with transfers. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/4/24 identified risk for skin impairment. Interventions directed to apply Geri-legs in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who exhibited behavioral symptoms, the facility failed to ensure a change in the anti-anxiety medication, Ativan, order was sent to the pharmacy and a follow through with the pharmacy when the Ativan was not available to prevent missed doses which resulted in Resident #1 having increased anxiety and agitation. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease and depression. The Resident Care Plan dated 11/1/24 identified Resident #1 was at risk for potential adverse effects of psychotropic drug use. Interventions directed to be aware of the resident's mood and behavior, be aware of mental status functioning on an ongoing basis, identify common behavioral expressions and expected responses to interventions, implement appropriate individualized, person centered interventions and document results. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for an allegation of abuse and neglect, the facility failed to ensure resident safety by removing a staff member from resident care after an allegation of abuse was reported in accordance with the facility's policy. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included vascular dementia, anxiety, and depression. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, place and time and required substantial/maximal assistance with transfers, personal care, and dressing. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/21/24 identified mood disorder related to anxiety, depression, and dementia. Interventions directed to follow with psych, medication, and assist with care. The nurse's note dated 10/19/24 at 7:00 AM identified the 11PM-7AM charge nurse was informed by the 11PM-7AM Nursing Supervisor that Resident #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #3) who were reviewed for comprehensive care plans, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #3's scissoring movements of his/her legs. The findings include: Resident #3's diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease, dementia, cognitive communication deficit and muscle weakness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life, required extensive assistance with toileting, and dressing, was dependent for showering and bathing and lower body dressing and required moderate assistance with personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan dated 12/14/23 identified Resident #3 was at risk for skin breakdown related to decreased mobility, poor nutrition, poor circulation, and altered sensation. Interventions directed gentle handling during all transfers and care procedures, inspect the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-20 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who were discharged home, the facility failed to provide documentation a medication reconciliation and review was conducted with the resident and/or family member to ensure a safe discharge. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included congestive heart failure, anemia, and atrial fibrillation. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had some short- and long-term memory deficits. The November 2023 physician orders identified Resident #1's medications regimen included Acetaminophen 325 milligrams (mg) two (2) tablets by mouth every four (4) hours as needed for pain, (a medication to treat high blood pressure) Amiodarone HCL 200 mg daily, (a blood thinning medication) Apixaban 2.5 mg every twelve (12) hours, (iron supplement) Ferrous Sulfate 325 mg one (1) every other day, (a medication to treat high blood pressure) Metoprolol 100…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of six (6) residents, (Resident #2), who was reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure incontinent care was provided to a resident who required total care with incontinent care. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included dementia, legal blindness, and amputation of the left leg below the knee. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had moderate cognitive impairment, required two person assist with bed mobility, one person assist with toileting, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/5/23 identified Resident #2 preferred to stay in bed most of the time and had fluctuations of incontinence with bowel and bladder with interventions that directed to provide incontinent care every 2-3 hours and clean thoroughly after each incontinent episode. A physician's order dated 9/1/23 directed bed mobility with assist of one, transfers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of six (6) residents who were reviewed for abuse, (Resident #1), the facility failed suspend an employee pending the outcome of an abuse investigation. The findings included: 1) Resident #1's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, type II diabetes and osteoarthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment, required two person assist with bed mobility, transfers and toileting. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/4/23 identified Resident #1 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and had a history of urinary tract infections with interventions that directed to provide incontinent care as needed and respond promptly to the call light. A Grievance form dated 7/3/23 and submitted by Person #1 identified on 7/1/23 incontinent care was not provided to Resident #1 every two hours and that NA #3 walked off the unit and went downstairs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for allegations of abuse, (Resident #1), the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect to the state agency within required time frames. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, type II diabetes and osteoarthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment, required two person assist with bed mobility, transfers and toileting. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/4/23 identified Resident #1 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and had a history of urinary tract infections with interventions directed provide incontinent care as needed and respond promptly to the call light. A Grievance form dated 7/3/23 and submitted by Person #1 identified on 7/1/23 incontinent care was not provided to resident #1 every two hours and that NA #3 walked off the unit and went…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for abuse, (Resident #1),the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation was completed and finalized in a timely manner following an allegation of neglect. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, type II diabetes and osteoarthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment, required two person assist with bed mobility, transfers and toileting and was incontinent of bowel and bladder The Resident Care Plan dated 5/4/23 identified Resident #1 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and had a history of urinary tract infections with interventions that directed to provide incontinent care as needed and respond promptly to the call light. A Grievance form dated 7/3/23 and submitted by Person #1 identified on 7/1/23 incontinent care was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed for allegations of neglect, (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is dependent on staff for care was provided with incontinent in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, type II diabetes and osteoarthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment, required two person assist with activities of daily living and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/4/23 identified Resident #1 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and had a history of urinary tract infections with interventions that directed to provide incontinent care as needed and respond promptly to the call light. A reportable event dated that on 7/6/23 the facility became aware that Resident #1 was not provided with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing levels to meet the needs of the residents. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, type II diabetes and osteoarthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment, required two person assist with activities of daily living and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/4/23 identified Resident #1 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and had a history of urinary tract infections. With interventions directed provide incontinent care as needed and respond promptly to the call light. A Reportable Event(s) dated 7/6/23 identified Person #1 alleged on 7/1/23 and on 7/2/23 that incontinent care was not provided to Resident #1. A review of the staffing schedules dated 7/1/23 through 7/2/23 identified on 7/1/23 where Resident #1 resided, there was one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of six (6) residents, (Resident #2 and Resident #3) who were reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included unspecified dementia, type II diabetes and osteoarthritis. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment, required two person assist with bed mobility, transfers and toileting. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/4/23 identified Resident #1 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and had a history of urinary tract infections. Interventions directed provide incontinent care as needed and respond promptly to the call light. A review of the ADL flow sheets dated 7/1/23 through 7/14/23 identified no documented ADL tasks for dressing 10 of 56 opportunities, no documentation for bladder elimination for 5 of 56 opportunities and no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy for 4 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #22, Resident #31, Resident #49 and Resident #56) observed for dining, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience as evident by utilizing hospital gowns (Resident #22, Resident #31 and Resident #49) and a bath towel (Resident #56) as clothing protectors during a meal. The findings include: 1. Resident #22's diagnoses included dementia with agitation, major depressive disorder and anxiety. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #22 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of 2 for bed mobility and transfers. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #22 required extensive assistance of 1 for dressing, personal hygiene and supervision with 1 person physical assistance for eating. A Resident Care Plan (not dated) identified Resident #22 required assistance with activities of daily living: bathing, dressing, transfers, toilet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on tour with the Maintenance Director, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, homelike environment related to marred furniture, soiled privacy curtains, walls in disrepair, main hall hand rails marred and overhead hall lights with debris and/or black specs. Observation of the environment on 1/9/23 at 10:53 AM and on 1/17/23 at 11:50 AM with the facility Maintenance Supervisor identified the following on Unit 1 A: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER]-1: the facility provided nightstand handle of the top drawer was dangling and the laminate trim was missing from around the table top, exposing the press board beneath. Additionally, the radiator in the room was marred and rusty. 2. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The bathroom and closet doors were marred. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The bathroom door was marred, the wall adjacent to the left of the bathroom was marred. 4. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The privacy curtain was soiled and the shelving unit next to the closet was observed with the trim strip…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and clinical record review for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #20) reviewed for enteral tube feeding, the facility failed to ensure water bolus physician orders were completed. The findings include: Resident #20's diagnoses included quadriplegia, dysphagia, rheumatoid arthritis and utilization of a gastrostomy (g-tube). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #20 was severely cognitively impaired and was totally dependent with two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toilet use. The MDS further identified Resident #20 required total dependence of 2 for personal hygiene and required a feeding tube. A Resident Care Plan dated 2/3/21 identified Resident #20 being at risk for a decline in nutritional status secondary to dysphagia and dehydration or fluid overload. Interventions included for a Dietitian (RD) to evaluate quarterly and as needed to monitor caloric intake, estimate needs and make recommendations for changes to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility staff training documentation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that staff completed annual training and competencies related to providing Intravenous Therapy. The findings include: A review of the state agency documentation offsite review identified the facility has a licensed capacity of 160 and an IV therapy program. An interview with RN#5 on 1/17/2023 at 1:30 PM indicated that she was not able to locate IV training and competencies for staff for January 2021 through December 15, 2022. Interview and review of the IV log with RN #4 on 1/17/2023 at 1:40 PM identified IV therapy was provided to residents from January 2021 through 12/15/2022 but no IV therapy had been provided after 12/15/22. RN #4 further indicated that she was unable to locate any staff training or competencies for licensed nurses regarding yearly annual IV training and competency. Review of the Facility Assessment on signed by the Administrator on 1/17/2023 indicated that yearly required in-services that are mandatory for all staff include IV training and competencies for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 40) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication was stored in a safe manner and inaccessible to a resident not assessed for self-medication administration and 1 of 3 medication rooms, the facility failed to monitor and document medication refrigerator storage temperatures. The finding included: 1. Resident #40 was admitted with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), schizophrenia and unspecified dementia. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #40 had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervised assist with ADL skills. The care plan dated 12/1/22 identified Resident #40 required assistance at times with ADL and at times refused medications. Interventions included to provide encouragement and to explain what each medication is when asked. The physician orders dated 1/4/23 directed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of the facility Infection Control Program for Immunizations, review of facility documentation and interview for 3 out of 5 residents ( Residents # 16 and #58), the facility failed to provide evidence that a consent and education for influenza and pneumovax vaccines were provided to the residents prior to the administration of the vaccine and failed to provide evidence that for ( Resident # 83 ),the pneumovax vaccine was offered to the resident. The findings include: A review of the facility Infection Control Program for Immunizations and a review of facility documentation on 1/17/23 failed to reflect a consent and or that education had been provided to Residents # 16 prior to the administration flu vaccine on 10/6/2022 and Resident # 58 who received the flu vaccine on 12/28/2022. Further review of facility documentation regarding immunization lacked evidence that the pneumovax vaccine was offered to Resident # 83. A review of facility documentation on 1/17/23 with RN # 4 at 1:15 PM during a discussion identified she could not provide the missing documentation at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, observation, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 30) reviewed for accommodation of needs, the facility failed to ensure a call light was accessible for the resident. The findings include: Resident #30 was admitted with diagnoses that included hemorrhage affecting non dominant side, poly neuropathy and anxiety. The care plan dated 10/20/22 identified Resident # 30 had a behavior problem where s/he may become easily frustrated when unable to express self or have to wait for care. The care plan also identified Resident #30 was at risk for falls. Interventions included keeping the call light within reach when in his/her room and to anticipate/ensure the resident's needs were met. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] and 12/25/22 identified Resident #30 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive two person assist with bed mobility, total 2 person assist with transfers. An interview on 1/11/23 at 2:35 PM with Person #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, observation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 30) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preference for returning to bed was honored. The findings include: Resident #30 was admitted with diagnoses that included hemiplegia/hemiparesis affecting the non-dominant side, poly neuropathy and anxiety. The care plan dated 10/20/22 identified Resident # 30 had a behavior problem where s/he may become easily frustrated when unable to express self or have to wait for care. The care plan also identified Resident #30 required assist with ADL related to a history of CVA (cerebral vascular accident) and left sided weakness. Interventions included anticipate/ensure needs were met, transfer per physician orders and to encourage rest periods between tasks due to poor strength and endurance. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] and 12/25/22 identified Resident #30 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive two person assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #94) reviewed for advanced directives, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained per facility policy. The findings include: Resident #94's diagnosis included diabetes mellitus, atherosclerotic heart disease and hypertension. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated [DATE] indicated a need for assistance with activities of daily living. Interventions included, in part advanced directives will be followed as indicated by the resident/responsible party and the physician's orders. A facility document labeled, Medical Intervention Consent Form, was signed by Resident #94, a staff member, and the physician on [DATE]. The form indicated Resident #94 consented to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), intravenous fluids, and hospitalization but no artificial nutrition. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #94 had no cognitive impairment. On [DATE] at 2:40 PM an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 68) reviewed for hospitalizations, the facility failed to notify the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) and the physician of a medication error. The findings include: Resident #68 was admitted with diagnoses that included aphasia secondary to cerebral infarction, gastrostomy and chronic respiratory failure. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #68 had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive two person assist with bed mobility and personal care and total dependence with transfers and eating. The assessment noted the resident had an enteral feeding tube. The care plan dated 11/1/22 identified Resident #68 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and a feeding tube. Interventions included monitoring and reporting signs of hyper/hypoglycemia and monitor for signs of aspiration. The care plan also identified a need for assist with dental care with interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect for (Resident #60), the facility failed to prevent physical abuse and for (Resident #65), the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from neglect as the resident was not provided incontinent care and repositioning in accordance with facility policy. The findings included: 1. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included stroke, major depressive disorder, and hemiplegia (1 sided of the body paralysis). A care plan last reviewed on 3/8/22 at a Resident Care Conference identified Resident #60 had a behavior problem and can be disrespectful of personal boundaries. Interventions included when the resident is observed on other units encourage to return to the unit. A care plan updated on 7/22/22 to identified that Resident #60 have begun yelling at staff making demands. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 55) reviewed for electronic movement alarms, the facility failed to notify the state agency within 5 days of an injury of unknown origin. The findings include: Resident #55 was admitted with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis, polyneuropathy and hypertension. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #55 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive of 2 persons assist with bed mobility and personal care. The care plan dated 11/11/22 identified Resident #55 was at risk for falls due to deconditioning, unsteady gait, and poor safety awareness. Interventions included ensuring the call light was within reach, to have commonly used articles within reach and to ensure floor mats were in place on both sides of the bed. The Reportable Event dated 12/2/22 identified Resident #55 sustained an injury of unknown origin after complaining of tenderness and limited range of motion. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy review, and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident #60) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to provide evidence of transfer documentation to an acute care facility for a change in status and for 1 residents (Resident # 96) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for the resident's discharge was obtained in accordance to facility policy. The findings included: 1. Resident #60's diagnoses included encephalopathy, Covid-19, seizures, and respiratory failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #60 was severely cognitively impaired, required total assistance with one person for personal hygiene and bathing, and extensive assistance with one person for dressing and toilet use. The MDS assessment further identified Resident #60 required limited assistance with one person for bed mobility and required setup for eating. A Resident Care Plan dated 11/3/22 identified Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #55) reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan with interventions that included a reduction plan for the use of a position change alarm and failed to ensure floor mats were properly placed at the bedside for a resident at risk for falls. The findings included: 1. Resident #55 was admitted with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis, polyneuropathy and hypertension. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #55 had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive of 2 persons assist with bed mobility and personal care. The care plan dated 11/2/22 identified Resident #55 was at risk for falls due to deconditioning, unsteady gait, and poor safety awareness. Interventions included ensuring the call light was within reach, to have commonly used articles within reach and ensure floor mats were in place on both sides of the bed. a. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 68) reviewed for hospitalizations, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to standards of care for a resident prescribed antibiotic therapy upon re-admission and a medication error report was completed in accordance to facility practice to meet professional standards. The findings include: Resident #68 was admitted with diagnoses that included aphasia secondary to cerebral infarction, gastrostomy and chronic respiratory failure. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #68 had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive two person assist with bed mobility and personal care and total dependence with transfers and eating. The assessment noted the resident had an enteral feeding tube. The care plan dated 11/1/22 identified Resident #68 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and a feeding tube. Interventions included monitoring and reporting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #6) reviewed for a non-pressure wound, the facility failed to measure the wound when it developed and for 1 resident (Resident #65) reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention, the facility failed to ensure the residents low air loss (LAL) mattress was assessed for function every shift and failed to ensure there was an physician's order present to check the function of the LAL mattress and for 1 resident (Resident # 68) reviewed for hospitalizations, the facility failed to follow hospital discharge recommendations for a resident requiring continued use for antibiotic therapy and enteral tube feedings and use of respiratory equipment. The findings included: 1. Resident #6's diagnoses included dementia, diabetes with polyneuropathy, peripheral vascular disease and atrial fibrillation. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/21/22 identified Resident #6 being at risk for skin integrity issues and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for weight loss for ( Resident # 24), the facility failed to monitor the residents weights and for (Resident # 68) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to address a significant weight discrepancy in a timely manner and according to facility policy. The findings included: 1 .Resident # 24's diagnoses included wedge compression fracture of first lumbar vertebra, abdominal hernia with gangrene, anemia, heart failure, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit. The physician's orders dated 11/14/22 directed to obtain weekly weights for 4 weeks. The readmission MDS assessment dated [DATE] noted the resident was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with ADL but was independent with eating. The assessment also noted a weight of 137 lbs. The 11/17/22 nutritional assessment noted identified the resident's meal intake was variable with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, observations, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 68) reviewed for respiratory equipment, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was stored according to infection control standards and failed to ensure that staff followed facility practice for glucometer cleaning and 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #20) reviewed for enteral tube feeding, the facility failed to ensure cleanliness of the tube feeding pump. The findings included: 1. Resident #68 was admitted with diagnoses that included aphasia secondary to cerebral infarction, gastrostomy, and chronic respiratory failure. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #68 had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive two person assist with bed mobility and personal care. The resident also required total care with transfers and eating and had an enteral feeding tube. The care plan dated 11/1/22 identified Resident #68 had a feeding tube. Interventions included to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-24 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 sections of handrails were attached securely to the wall. Observation on 1/9/23 at 10:53 AM and on 1/17/23 at 11:50 AM with the facility Maintenance Supervisor identified the following: 3 sections of handrails were not securely attached to the wall on Unit 1 A located between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], between the nursing station and the utility room, and by elevator A which was next to the Purell hand sanitizer station. Interview with the Maintenance Supervisor on 1/17/23 during the 11:50 AM tour indicated although environmental rounds are completed monthly he did not identify loose handrails.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-21 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #31) reviewed for, pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure a referral was made to the state designated authority when a new psychiatric diagnoses were identified. The findings include: Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, early onset cerebellar ataxia, atrial fibrillation and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and quadriplegia. The PASRR level 1 assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident did not have a level 2 condition, therefore, the outcome was that the resident had a negative level 1 (level 1 negative means that there isn't a qualifying psychiatric diagnosis to warrant conducting a level 2 assessment. The outcome of the PASRR level 1 assessment with a review date of 04/20/12 determined the resident had long term approval. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 3 sampled residents (Residents #2, #14 & #33) reviewed for medication administration and activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide timely care and services. The findings include: 1. Resident #2's diagnoses included Congestive heart failure (CHF), Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and Hypertension (HTN). A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had moderate cognitive impairments, required supervision with ADLs and received antidepressant and diuretics during the last even (7) days. Resident care plan dated 2/6/20 identified a problem with coronary artery disease related to Atrial Fibrillation, HTN, presence of a pacemaker and CKD. Interventions included to encourage compliance to treatment regimen and to administer all cardiac medications as ordered by the physician. Same care plan identified a problem with an infection with Clostridium…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #33) who required assistance with activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure the provision of care in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #33's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, history of femur fracture, depression and anxiety. The 5 day significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #33 was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance with bed mobility and was totally dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene. Additionally, Resident #33 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident care plan (RCP) dated 11/29/19 identified the issue of urinary incontinence related to cognitive loss/dementia. Care plan interventions included to assist resident with perineal care as needed and respond promptly to requests for toileting. Interview with Person #2 on 2/18/20 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #37) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was self-administering a medication was assessed for safety. The findings include: Resident #37's diagnoses included congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #37 was without cognitive impairments and was independent with activities of daily living (ADL's). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/7/20 identified the resident was independent with most ADL's and may need assistance at times. Interventions included, keep frequently used articles within reach, assist as needed and assure safety while performing ADL's. A physician's order dated 2/18/20 directed that it was ok to keep Mouth Kote (oral moisturizer) spray with the resident at the bedside and can administer as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #29 & #502) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions and provide the necessary supervision for residents with a history of falls. The findings include: 1. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, bipolar disorder and a current episode of mania with severe psychotic features. A nurse's note dated 12/5/19 at 10:05 PM identified Resident #29 arrived via ambulance at 3:00 PM from an acute care hospital. A fall risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #29 had a fall risk score of 16 (A score of 10 or above indicates a resident is at risk for falls). A reportable event dated 12/11/19 identified Resident #29 was found in his/her room on the floor laying on the right side at 4:00 PM. Interventions subsequent to the fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #62) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained according to dietitian recommendations. The findings include: Resident #62's diagnoses included dementia, depression and cerebral palsy. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #62 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene and eating. The assessment further identified that the resident's height was 68 inches, weight was 133 pounds, the resident had not had a weight loss or weight gain in the past 6 months and the resident had a mechanically altered diet. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/17/19 identified the potential for a nutritional decline with interventions that included, offer an alternate meal if the resident does not like what is served, offer to set up meals, provide me with my diet and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #65) reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to appropriate provide care and treatment for a resident with dementia. The findings include: Resident #65's diagnoses included anxiety, depression and dementia. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #65 was severely cognitively impaired, did not exhibit behavioral symptoms and required extensive assistance with bed mobility transfers and personal hygiene, and required supervision with locomotion on the unit. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated [DATE] identified a cognition and communication barrier, psychotropic medication use and mood and behavior with periods of sadness related to a diagnosis of depression, anxiety and dementia. Interventions included, be patient and reassure resident, be aware of mood and behavior, and potential for ongoing depression (crying,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review and facility staff interviews for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #14) observed for medication administration, the facility failed to administer medications as directed by the physician, resulting in a medication error rate over 5%. The findings included: Resident #14's diagnoses included chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension (HTN) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had moderate cognitive impairments, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, hygiene and toilet use. The assessment further identified that the resident was on a scheduled pain management regimen, experienced pain on an almost constant basis over the last 5 days and noted the pain level was moderate (the parameters are mild, moderate, severe and very severe). Resident#14's care plan dated 12/5/19 identified a problem with respiratory status due to the diagnoses of COPD with interventions that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #37) reviewed for choices, the facility failed to ensure a medication was stored in a secure location. The findings include: Resident #37's diagnoses included congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #37 was without cognitive impairments and was independent with activities of daily living (ADL's). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/7/20 identified the resident was independent with most ADL's and may need assistance at times. Interventions included, keep frequently used articles within reach, assist as needed and assure safety while performing ADL's. A physician's order dated 2/18/20 directed that it was ok to keep Mouth Kote (oral moisturizer) spray with the resident at the bedside and can administer as needed for dry mouth. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-05-19 · tag F0637 — pattern
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for pressure injury, and for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #78) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident with a decline in 2 or more areas. The findings include: 1. Resident #44's diagnoses included dementia, pressure ulcer of sacral region (Stage 3), and anxiety. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 11/1/24 identified Resident #44 was at risk for skin breakdown due to decreased mobility, incontinence, and poor nutrition. Interventions included to offer and/or encourage Resident #44 to reposition as needed and provide incontinent care as needed. The RCP further identified Resident #44 had the potential for nutritional decline related to pain and Resident #44 did not like to eat breakfast per his/her choice. Interventions included encourage Resident #44 to eat as much of his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-05-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and interview for one of one resident (Resident #80) reviewed for timeliness of care planning, the facility failed to conduct a quarterly care conference. The findings include: Resident #80 diagnosis included diabetes, anxiety, and depression. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #80 was cognitively intact and was independent for eating, transferring, showering, dressing, and toileting. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/3/25 identified that Resident #80 was at risk for changes in mood related to the diagnosis of anxiety, and depression with interventions directed to encourage Resident #80 to converse and express his/her feelings, attend group activities, and offer to discuss feelings on being placed at the facility. The Resident Care Conference (RCC) note dated 4/1/25 at 1:44 PM identified that Resident #80 was out of the building on leave of absence and that the meeting was postponed. An interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, facility documentation, and review of facility policy for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms, the facility failed to maintain proper refrigerator temperatures for medication storage. The findings include: Observation of Unit 1C medication storage room with the ADNS and LPN #10 on 5/19/25 at 11:25 AM identified that the medication refrigerator was documented on the temperature logs to be out of range on 5/1/25, 5/2/25, 5/3/25, 5/5/25, 5/6/25, 5/8/25, 5/9/25, 5/10/25 5/12/25, 5/14/25, 5/15/25 5/16/25, and 5/17/25. The refrigerator temperature log identified ranges should be between 36 degrees Fahrenheit (F) through 46 degrees F and were documented between 28 degrees F and 32 degrees F. The refrigerator contained 2 vials of Lispro 100units/ml, 2 Lispro Kwik pens 100units/ml, 1 Lantus Solostar pen 100units/ml, 3 Insulin Glargine pens, 1 Ozempic pen, 67 Bisacodyl 10 mg suppositories, 4 Acetaminophen 650mg suppositories,1 bottle of Brimonidine Tartrate ophthalmic solution, 1 Vancomycin Iso-osmotic 1gm/200mls, and 1 0.9% Sodium Chloride 100mls. An interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-01-24 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff/resident interviews the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays after delivery from the postal service. The findings include: On 1/9/23 at 100 PM, interview with Resident #52 identified that mail was only delivered to residents Monday through Friday, and although mail was received at the facility from the postal service, there were no staff to pass out mail to residents. On 1/17/23 at 10:23 AM, interview with the Director of Recreation identified that mail comes to the facility from the postal services at approximately 12:00 PM and the Recreation department delivers mail to residents Monday through Friday. Additionally, the Director of Recreation identified because there was not Recreation staff at the facility on Saturdays, the mail was held at the reception desk and passed out to residents when Recreation returns on Mondays. On 1/17/23 at 11:10 AM, interview with the Weekend Receptionist identified that he works at the Reception desk from 10:30 AM to 3:30 PM on Saturdays and Sundays and when mail arrives on Saturdays from the postal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-01-24 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews the facility failed to ensure snacks were passed out after dinner/before bed on Unit 1A. The findings include: On 1/9/23 at 1:00 PM, interview with Resident #52 identified that evening snacks used to be passed out to residents up until approximately one month ago. Resident #52 identified that the snack cart typically contained pudding, jello, fruit, crackers and beverages and he/she does not request an evening snack because he/she was waiting for the snack cart to arrive. On 1/12/23 at 3:10 PM, interview with Nurse Aide (NA) #3 identified that she worked at the facility for approximately 3 months, and usually works on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift on Unit 1A. NA #3 further identified that she does not pass out snacks/nourishments on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift because she was never oriented to do so. On 1/17/23 at 10:00 AM, interview with the Administrator identified that snacks should be passed out a few hours after dinner via a snack cart. The snack cart is provided by the Dietary department and contains pudding, crackers, cookies, and juices. If resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2020-02-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to consistently sign Controlled Substance Change of Shift Audit sheets to signify audits were performed. The findings include: Observations on 2/18/20 at 12:16 PM identified unit 2C Controlled Substance Change of Shift Audit sheets were missing signatures in multiple places on the February, January and September Shift Audit sheets to indicate that controlled substances were counted at the start and the end of each shift. The December, November, and October 2019 sheets were not available at the time of the observation. There were nine signatures missing on the February 2020 Shift Audit sheet , 17 signatures missing on the January 2020 Shift Audit sheet, and 35 signatures missing on the September 2019 Shift Audit sheet. The October, November, and December 2019 audit sheets could not be located by the facility during the observation dated 2/18/20 at 12:16 PM. Interview with RN#4 identified that the facility expectation is that the audit sheets are signed at the beginning and end of each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-07-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to APPLE REHAB — 20 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 19 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FOLEY, BRIANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR100%since 09/28/2004
SINGH, DEVIKAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/10/2018
VESS, RYANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/15/2013

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 5%Other / private 23%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$324per resident / day
operating cost
$9,864per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$334per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075047. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next