No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES

Ownership rollup across 36 nursing homes in 2 states: Arizona, Missouri. The "follow the money" view of an operator’s whole portfolio — the pattern a single facility page can’t show.

Insights

The chain’s homes average 2.5 of 5 stars on the CMS overall rating — roughly in line with the ~2.6 average of the 2 states it operates in. It has been broadly flat, moving +0.00 stars across the same 36 homes rated throughout between 2025-02 and 2026-06. We benchmark against its own states because CMS ranks the health-inspection star within each state, so a national comparison (national average ~3.0) partly measures where a chain operates rather than how it operates.

36
Homes in this chain
3,549
Certified beds99 per home on average
63%
Occupied2,227 residents a day across 3,549 beds
+0.00
Star changeacross the 36 homes rated throughout · 2025-02 to 2026-06
2
States covered
2.5
Average CMS rating~2.6 in its states · ~3.0 nationally

Where the rating comes from

The CMS overall star blends three different things. Split apart across the whole portfolio, they say different things about an operator: thin staffing is a budget decision made above the building, while a weak inspection score is what surveyors actually found inside it.

ComponentChain averageBasis
Health inspection3.1 of 536 rated homesstate surveyors’ findings, ranked within each state
Staffing2.0 of 536 rated homesfrom payroll (PBJ) hours
Quality measures1.9 of 536 rated homeslargely self-reported clinical data

Averaged across this chain’s rated homes. Health-inspection stars are assigned within each state’s own distribution, so for a chain spanning several states this component mixes distributions and is best read alongside each home’s actual citations.

Portfolio red flags

How many of this chain’s homes carry the most serious CMS markers. One flagged home can be local; a pattern across the portfolio is an operator-level signal worth researching.

5 with immediate-jeopardy citations3 with an abuse flag14 with federal fines

Follow the money — chain finances

Aggregated from each home’s CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS). Related-party payments are dollars a home sends to landlords or management companies under common ownership — the main channel through which private-equity and REIT owners can pull money out of a home while its own books still show a thin margin.

$44.5M
Related-party expensesummed across 36 homes · FY2023 cost reports
26%
of operating expensegoes to related companies, across the 36 homes reporting both figures
+0.1%
Operating marginrevenue-weighted across 36 homes with a cost report
$589K
Total federal fines14 homes fined

Only homes with a cost report on file are included, so the related-party total is a floor. Cost reports are self-filed, unaudited, and a year or two behind.

Who pays — share of resident-days across this chain
Medicaid 76%Medicare 8%Other / private 16%

Weighted by each home’s average daily census, across the all 36 homes that report both a usable payer mix and a census. Homes whose cost report fails the same validity check the facility pages apply are left out of this figure entirely rather than counted as zero.

Every home in this chain

Lowest-rated first, so the homes most worth a closer look sit at the top. Each links to its full inspection, staffing, fines, and ownership record.

HomeCMS ratingFlags
Mountain View ManorPrescott, AZ 1 of 5Abuse flag
Apple Ridge Care CenterWaverly, MO 1 of 5
Autumn Oaks Caring CenterMountain Grove, MO 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $48,539 fined
Brent B Tinnin ManorEllington, MO 1 of 5
Clinton Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterClinton, MO 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $83,041 fined
Hill Crest ManorHamilton, MO 1 of 5$13,033 fined
Jefferson Health CareLees Summit, MO 1 of 5$34,459 fined
Lawson Manor & RehabLawson, MO 1 of 5Abuse flag $51,882 fined
Maywood Terrace Living CenterIndependence, MO 1 of 5
Ridge Crest Nursing CenterWarrensburg, MO 1 of 5
Truman Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterLamar, MO 1 of 5Abuse flag
Valley Manor And Rehabilitation CenterExcelsior Springs, MO 1 of 5
Granby HouseGranby, MO 2 of 5
Lakeview Health Care & Rehabilitation CenterBoonville, MO 2 of 5$49,335 fined
Quail Run Health Care CenterCameron, MO 2 of 5
Riverdell Care CenterBoonville, MO 2 of 5
WestgateJoplin, MO 2 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $70,134 fined
Desert Highlands Care CenterKingman, AZ 3 of 5
Havasu Nursing CenterLake Havasu City, AZ 3 of 5
Adair VillageClinton, MO 3 of 5$72,950 fined
Cotton Point Living CenterMatthews, MO 3 of 5$14,069 fined
Delhaven ManorSaint Louis, MO 3 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $73,048 fined
Hunter Acres Caring CenterSikeston, MO 3 of 5$10,023 fined
Manor, ThePoplar Bluff, MO 3 of 5
River Oaks Care CenterSteele, MO 3 of 52 immediate-jeopardy $41,389 fined
Sikeston Convalescent CenterSikeston, MO 3 of 5$13,627 fined
Yuma Nursing CenterYuma, AZ 4 of 5
Communities Of Wildwood RanchJoplin, MO 4 of 5
Heart Of The Ozarks Healthcare CenterAva, MO 4 of 5
Heartland Care And Rehabilitation CenterCape Girardeau, MO 4 of 5
Houston HouseHouston, MO 4 of 5
Puxico Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPuxico, MO 4 of 5
Riverview Nursing CenterMokane, MO 4 of 5
Riverways ManorVan Buren, MO 4 of 5
Southgate Living CenterCaruthersville, MO 4 of 5$13,397 fined
Shady Oaks Healthcare CenterThayer, MO 5 of 5
Read this as a floor, not a verdict. CMS chain and ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties, and a low chain average can hide strong individual homes (or vice-versa). Use it to know which questions to ask — then read each home’s actual inspection record and confirm current ownership with your state licensing agency.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (nursing-home ratings, deficiencies, penalties, and ownership) and the CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS) for finances. Chain membership is as reported to CMS. CMS extracts retrieved 30 August 2026; CMS refreshes them monthly, so counts here are as of that date. Verify with the facility and your state regulator.