Yuma Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 38.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 84.6 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 35 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, interviews, review of facility documentation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident #4 was free from abuse from resident #5. The deficient practice could result in residents experiencing emotional, physical, and mental trauma from the abuse. Findings include: Related to resident #4- Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, Dementia, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed resident #4 completed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scored a 12 which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of resident #4's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a progress note dated December 1, 2024 at 7:45 p.m. The note indicated that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) informed the nurse that resident #4 was slapped on the right forearm by male peer who stated, you need to stop crying. The progress note also noted that both residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on documentation, staff interviews and the facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#12) was free from abuse from other residents (#12). This deficient practice could result in other residents being abused. Findings include: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alheimer's disease, anxiety, generalized muscle weakness. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] included a brief interview for mental status score of 08 indicating the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment. Review of a nurse practitioner note dated October 4, 2024 revealed that resident #12 is an [AGE] year old female with a past medical history of Alzheimer's disease and a mixed mood disorder and the resident resides in a memory care unit in a long-term care facility. Review of the progress notes revealed a late entry dated October 4, 2024 at 7:25 p.m. by the Director of Nursing (DON/staff #1), which stated that she was called into the hallway, where a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (#20) was free from physical abuse by other residents (resident #100). The deficient practice could result in further incidents of resident to resident abuse. Findings include: -Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Calculus of Kidney, Cystocele, Metabolic encephalopathy, anxiety, and dementia. A behavioral care plan dated January 30, 2024 revealed the resident was at risk of wandering and intruding on another residents' privacy. The goal was noted to be wandering will not contribute to injury, with noted interventions of alerting staff when the resident is wandering, and place resident in area where frequent observation is possible. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 which indicated the resident had significant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation, and policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy, by failing to report an allegation of abuse within the required time for two residents (#100 and #20). This deficient practice could result in further incidents of abuse not being reported. Findings include: -Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Calculus of Kidney, Cystocele, Metabolic encephalopathy, anxiety, and dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 which indicated the resident had significant cognitive impairment. -Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Urinary tract infection, metabolic encephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, and restlessness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed clinical record review, staff interviews, facility documentation and policy review and the State Agency (SA) database, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse for one resident (#20) was reported to the State Agency as required. The deficient practice could result in abuse not being identified and investigated. Findings include: -Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Calculus of Kidney, Cystocele, Metabolic encephalopathy, anxiety, and dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 which indicated the resident had significant cognitive impairment. -Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Urinary tract infection, metabolic encephalopathy, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, and restlessness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical records, staff interviews and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent elopement for two residents (#178 and #179). The deficient practice could result in increase the risk of resident for harm and injury. Findings include: -Resident #178 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance, restlessness, agitation and wandering. A progress note dated January 8, 2021 included the resident was admitted at the facility, was alert, oriented to self only, pleasant and responding well and had a steady gait and balance with sufficient strength to extremities. A progress note dated January 10, 2021 revealed the resident was roaming and refused to go to her room. Per the note the resident made statement about wanting to go outside and was told that she was not able to at this time. Per the documentation, staff attempted to divert the resident's attention but had no positive effect and the resident continued to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions for one resident (#157) were implemented. The deficient practice could result in the spread of the COVID-19 virus. Findings include: Resident #157 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the baseline care plan dated May 20, 2022 included a plan for the resident to self-quarantine for 7 days. The Summary Orders included an order dated May 20, 2022 for COVID-19 screening - monitor for cough, shortness of breath, fever, headache, repeated shaking with chills, new loss of taste of or smell, diarrhea, muscle pain, sore throat or vomiting every shift. Review of the clinical documentation dated May 23, 2022, revealed that the resident's family members declined to have the resident vaccinated for the COVID-19 virus. On May 24, 2022 at 8:30 a.m., resident #157 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-05-27 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
  Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on employee record reviews, facility documentation, staff interview, and facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to conduct COVID-19 testing based on the frequency set forth by state and federal guidelines for three staff (#3, #57, #62). The deficient practice could result in the spread of the COVID-19 virus. Findings include: Review of facility documentation revealed that the county positivity rate was substantial/high from May 9, 2022 through May 23, 2022 and required COVID-19 testing 2 times per week. -Staff #3's (Speech Therapist) employee record included an exemption form from the COVID-19 vaccine approved on December 5, 2021. Review of staff #3's employee records revealed that he received a POC (Point of Care) COVID-19 test on May 10, 13, and 24 and the results were negative. The Time Card from May 9, 2022 through May 23, 2022 for staff #3 revealed that staff #3 worked at the facility on May 9, 10, 11, 13, 17, 18, 23, and 24. Comparison of the test dates and Time Card revealed that staff #3 worked on May 17 and 18, 2022, but was not tested for COVID-19 during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, the facility investigation report and document, clinical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#18) was treated in a dignified manner. The sample size was 15 residents. The deficient practice could negatively impact the psychosocial wellbeing of residents. Findings include: Resident #18 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure, dehydration, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, and major depressive disorder. During the initial part of the survey, an interview was conducted with resident #18 on May 23, 2022 at 12:19 PM, who stated that a CNA (certified nursing assistant) had said the resident was fat, and was a problem to move and was lazy. The resident also stated that she asked the CNA to leave or get another staff member to assist, but the CNA continued the care and gave the resident an evil smile. The resident stated that she had not told the administration…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-05-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one sampled resident's (#39) needs and preferences were addressed, regarding a wheelchair and cushion. The deficient practice could result in residents' needs/preferences not being addressed. Findings include: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), Parkinson's disease, limitation of activities due to disability, muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. An observation and interview conducted on May 24, 2022 at 10:00 AM revealed the resident lying in the bed. During an interview with the resident, she stated that she asked for a bigger wheelchair, and that some people came in to talk to her about it a month ago, but she has not heard back. The resident further stated that she cannot go to activities because the wheelchair is not comfortable. Review of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AZ