Lakeview Health Care & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 44.0 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-07-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of pressure injuries and promote healing when staff failed to complete weekly wound assessments for one resident (Resident #1) of three sampled residents and failed to notify the physician when the resident's pressure injury worsened. The facility census was 45. 1. Review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel's, Staging Definitions, dated 2016, showed Stage 3 Pressure Injury: Full-thickness skin loss Full-thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole (rolled wound edges) are often present. Slough and/or eschar may be visible. The depth of tissue damage varies by anatomical location; areas of significant adiposity can develop deep wounds. Undermining and tunneling may occur. Fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage and/or bone are not exposed. If…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, and record review facility staff failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse for one resident (Resident #1) to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two hour timeframe. The facility's census was 52.Review of the facilities Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and misappropriation prevention program, revised April 2021, showed the residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse, and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's symptoms. The resident abuse, neglect, and exploitation prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of property by anyone including but not limited to other residents. Staff will identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for residents when staff failed to attempt to minimize foul odors in the hallway and facility entrance, failed to repair wall damage and failed to repair wheelchairs. The facility census was 46.1. Review of the facility's Homelike Environment policy, dated February 2021, showed:-The facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting to include: a clean sanitary and orderly environment, clean bed linens that are in good condition and pleasant, neutral scents;-The facility staff and management minimize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a depersonalized, institutional setting, to include, institutional odors. 2. Observation on 01/05/26 at 9:45 A.M., showed the entranceway to the facility with a foul strong odor.Observation on 01/05/26 at 1:35 P.M., showed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure three residents (Resident #3, #42, and #45), who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs), received the necessary care and services to maintain personal hygiene out of eight sampled residents. The facility census was 46. 1. Review of the facility's ADL policy, dated April 2025, showed appropriate care and services are provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's, independently, with the consent of the resident, and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with bathing, dressing grooming and oral care) and toileting. 2. Review of Resident #3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 11/18/25, showed staff assessed the resident as:-Cognitively impaired;-Did not have behaviors or reject care;-Dependent on staff for personal hygiene;-Diagnoses of dementia and diabetes.Review of the resident's care plan, dated 10/10/25, showed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to reheat pureed food items in accordance with standardized recipes and failed to maintain the internal temperature of pureed food items placed on the steam table to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogens and potential for food-borne illness. The facility census was 46.1. Review of the facility's Cooking and Cooling policy, dated 2020, showed: -Foods will be cooked thoroughly, reaching the appropriate internal temperature specific to each item;-Length of cooking time and internal temperatures vary according to the type of food and temperatures must be reached and held for a specified amount of time;-A properly calibrated thermometer should be inserted into the thickest part of the food, and at least two readings should be taken in different places to ensure the proper temperature has been reached. Review of the facility's Pureed Food Preparation policy, dated 2020, showed the policy did not provide guidance to reheat pureed food items in accordance with the standardized recipes to prevent the growth of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, facility staff failed to report an allegation of physical abuse for one resident (Resident #1) to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the two-hour timeframe. The facility's census was 43. 1. Review of the facility's Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy, Revised July 2014, showed an alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment (including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of resident property) will be reported immediately, but no later than two hours if the alleged violation involves abuse or has resulted in serious bodily injury; or 24 hours if the alleged violation does not involve abuse and has not resulted in serious bodily injury. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported.2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 05/21/25, showed staff assessed the resident as follows:-Moderate cognitive impairment;-No impairment to upper (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand) and lower (hip, knee, ankle, foot)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to transcribe one resident (Resident #2) out of two sampled residents medication Omeprazole (used for heartburn) order from the hospital. The facility census was 43.1. Review of the facility's Administering Medications policy, dated 2001, showed staff are directed as follows:-Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed;-The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication;-If a dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident, the person preparing or administering the medication will contact the prescriber, the resident's attending physician or the facility's medical director to discuss the concerns.2. Review of Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, dated 05/29/25, showed staff assessed the resident as cognitively intact, and diagnoses to include heart failure, high…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for two residents (Resident #1 and #2) out of three sampled residents care plans who sustained falls. The facility census was 42. 1. Review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy, dated 03/2022, showed assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Review of the facility's Falls policy, undated, showed falls can often be an indicator of an impending decline. Each fall must be followed up with and updated in the plan of care with new interventions. 2. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 03/24/25, showed staff assessed the resident as severely cognitively impaired and one non-injury fall since admission. Review of the facility's Registered Nurse (RN) Investigation Report, dated 03/23/25, showed staff documented the found…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to follow infection control practices and implement outbreak testing when two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) became symptomatic for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) . The facility census was 48. 1. Review of the facilty's COVID-19 - Testing Residents policy, undated, showed facility staff were directed to test residents with sign or symptoms of COVID-19 as soon as possible, regardless of vaccination status. Staff are directed residents and staff are tested for the SARS-CoV-2 virus to detect the presence of current infections (viral testing) and to help prevent the transmission of COVID-19 in the facility. Facility staff to conduct out break testing is initiated when a single new case of COVID-19 occurs among resident or staff to determine if others have been exposed, and a single new case of SARS-CoV-2 infection in any staff or resident should be evaluated to determine if others in the facility could have been exposed. 2. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  AT Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. The facility census was 35. 1. Review of the facility's Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing Policy, undated, showed the facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services 24 hours a day, including a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours daily, seven days a week. 2. Review of the facility's RN staff schedule, dated June 2024, showed the facility did not have an RN in the building on: -06/28/24; -06/29/24; -06/30/24. 3. Review of the facility's RN staff schedule, dated July 2024, showed the facility did not have an RN in the building on: -07/04/24; -07/05/24; -07/06/24; -07/07/24; -07/08/24; -07/09/24; -07/10/24; -07/22/24; -07/27/24; -07/28/24. 4. Review of the facility's RN staff schedule, dated August 2024, showed the facility did not have an RN in the building on: -08/03/24; -08/04/24;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Reviewed-sk/at Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to designate a person to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services with the appropriate qualifications, when the facility did not employ a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional full-time. This failure has the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 35. 1. Review of the facility provided policies, showed the records did not contain a policy related to the qualifications for Director of Food and Nutrition Services. During an interview on 09/10/24 at 9:08 A.M., the dietary supervisor (DS) said he/she started in the dietary supervisor position about three months prior. The DS said he/she had taken food handler courses in the past but had never taken any type of food service manager courses. The DS said he/she thought he/she was signed up for an on-line food service manager course but the assistant administrator had the paperwork. The DS said he/she had not started the food service manager course because the kitchen was short staffed and he/she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$49,335 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $49,335 — penalty dated 2024-07-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $825K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO