No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Communities Of Wildwood Ranch

3222 South John Duffy Drive, Joplin, MO 64804 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (417) 621-0175 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (417) 621-0175 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Jul 20231 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
444 Four States Dr Ste 1A · (877) 783-4441 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1605 K66 · (620) 783-1636 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1842 W 21st St · (417) 622-8549 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4300 W 29th St · (417) 625-4750 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3035 S Central City Rd · (417) 623-3333

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.7%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.4%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.6%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms8.4%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened32.7%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication21.2%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.6%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.1%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.0%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.3%63.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.7%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.6%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.132.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.972.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 349 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.68U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.36hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 185 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.68 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.0%CMS range 45.3–56.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 8.7–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge49.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge31.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 6.0–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.26
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.81
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
42.1%
Total nursing turnover
18.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 105.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.26 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.98 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-13)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure an environment as free for accident hazards of possible for all residents, when the facility failed to ensure staff were aware of where to find care planned fall interventions and followed care planned fall intervention for one resident (Resident #1) resulting the resident falling from his/her bed, while not in the low position, and left unattended. The fall resulted in facial injuries and skin tears requiring the resident to be sent to the hospital. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility's policy Falls and Fall Risk, revised March 2018, showed the following: -Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling; -Environmental factors that contribute to the risk of falls include incorrect bed height or width; -Resident conditions that may contribute to the risk of falls include delirium and cognitive impairment; -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from unnecessary medications when staff administered blood pressure medication to one resident (Resident #22) when the resident's blood pressure was outside for the physician ordered parameters for administration. Review of the facility's policy titled Clinical Administering Medications, with a revised date of April 2019, showed the following: -Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders; -If a dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident, or a medication has been identified as having potential adverse consequences for the resident or is suspected of being associated with adverse consequences, the person preparing or administering the medication will contact the prescriber, the resident's attending physician, or the facility's medical director to discuss the concerns. 1. Review of Resident #22's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were as free from accident hazards as possible when staff completed a slide transfer for one resident (Resident #1) without ensuring the area was free from potential hazards prior to completing transfer resulting in the resident's leg getting caught in a blanket while being transferred resulting in pain. The facility had a census of 109. Review of a facility policy titled, Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, revised July 2017, showed the following information: -Nursing staff in conjunction with rehabilitation staff shall assess resident needs for transfer assistance and will document the resident transfer and lift needs in the care plan; -Manual lifting of residents shall be eliminated when feasible. Review of a facility policy titled, Lifting Safety Precautions, revised March 2005, showed the following information: -When lifting or moving residents staff are to ensure equipment is secure; -If there are mechanical devices available to assist in moving residents more safety staff are to utilize…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to implement policies and procedures to help prevent abuse when staff failed to ensure the required criminal background checks (CBC - check that searches for criminal misconduct) for three staff members (Registered Nurse (RN) B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) D, and Social Services (SS) A); employee disqualification list (EDL - list maintained by the Department of Health and Senior Services of individuals who have been determined to have: abused or neglected a resident; misappropriated funds or property belonging to a resident) checks for four staff members (RN B, Office Staff C, LPN D, and Certified Occupation Therapy Assistant (COTA) F); and the CNA registry (Certified Nurse Aide - list of all nursing assistants who meet the requirements to practice under that title within their state) check for three staff members (RN B, COTA A and CNA E) were completed prior to staff beginning employment at the facility. The facility census was 103. Review of the facility provided policy titled, New Hire Checklist, dated February…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-28 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #8's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 06/29/23; -Diagnoses included dependence on acute respiratory failure and pneumothorax (the presence of air or gas in the cavity between the lungs and chest wall, causing collapse of the lung). Review of the resident's discharge MDS, dated [DATE], showed the resident discharged with return anticipated. Review of the resident's progress notes dated 07/24/23, at 1:41 A.M., showed the following: -Night shift 07/23/23 - The resident was sent to the hospital for evaluation due to shortness of breath, diminished lung sounds, edema (swelling), rapid weight gain with history of kidney disease, cardiac disease, and respiratory failure. Staff notified family. Staff notified administrator and physician notified via electronic system. Review of the resident's medical record showed staff did documentation regarding the facility's bed-hold policy being provided to the resident or resident's representative related to the transfer to the hospital. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight to all residents to prevent possible accidents/elopements when the staff did not complete checks of wander guards (wander/elopement alarm/devices) as ordered; when the facility failed to ensure the wander guard device alarms alarmed at all panels and pagers; and when staff failed to follow policy to ensure residents were accounted after one resident (Resident #14) exited the building causing the wander guard alarm to sound. The facility had a census of 103. Review of the facility's policy titled, Elopement Precautions/Missing Resident, undated, showed the following: -The facility does not have a special care unit; -In this facility, all exit doors are alarmed; -Any resident who is an elopement risk shall have a personal electronic monitoring device placed on their wrist, ankle or assistive device; -The doors that are activated by the electronic monitoring system include all dining room doors located in each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-24 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument, completed by facility staff) assessment for four residents (Resident #2, #3, #9, and #24) out of 19 sampled residents, within 14 days from the assessment reference date (ARD). The facility had a census of 91. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 2, Assessments for the RAI, showed the following information: -The quarterly assessment is an Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA) non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type; -The quarterly assessment is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessments to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored; and -The ARD must be not more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent OBRA assessment of any type. 1. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-24 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to transmit a Death in Facility Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument, required to be completed by facility staff for care planning) record within 14 days of a death in the facility for one resident (Resident #6). The facility had a census of 91. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 2, Assessments for the RAI, showed the following information: -The Death in Facility Tracking Record consists of demographic and administrative items; it must be completed when the resident dies in the facility or when on leave of absence (LOA); -The record must be completed within seven days after the resident's death, and within 14 days after the resident's death, staff should electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System. 1. Record review of Resident #6's medical record showed the following information: -admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-24 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a side rail assessment to include a risk/benefit review and alternatives attempted prior to use, and failed to obtain informed consent for the use of side rails for four residents (Resident #29, #67, #95 and #101). The facility failed to complete bed rail measurements for one resident (Resident #95). A sample of 19 were reviewed. The facility census was 91. Record review of a facility policy entitled, Bed Safety (Revised December 2007), showed the following information: -Facility shall strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for the resident; -Resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team, considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and family regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment; -To try to prevent deaths/injuries from the beds and related equipment (including the frame, mattress, side rails,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to complete an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment instrument, completed by facility staff) assessment for three residents (Resident #3, #12 and #24) within the required 14 days from the assessment reference date (ARD). A sample of 19 residents was selected for review; the facility had a census of 91. Record review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 2, Assessments for the RAI, showed the following information: -The Annual assessment is an OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed on an annual basis (at least every 366 days) unless an SCSA (Significant Change in Status Assessment) or an SCPA (Significant Correction to Previous Assessment) has been completed since staff completed the most recent comprehensive assessment; -The Annual assessment ARD is the ARD of previous OBRA comprehensive assessment plus 366 calendar days, and ARD of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff cleaned and maintained a continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP - treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep), with a hose and mask or nosepiece to deliver constant and steady air pressure) according to professional standards, failed to have a physician's order for a CPAP, failed to have a diagnosis for sleep apnea, and failed to address in the care plan the use of the CPAP for one resident (Resident #310); and failed to ensure staff changed oxygen equipment per professional standards, and failed to address in the care plan the use of oxygen for one resident (Resident #95), out of a sample of 19 residents. The facility had a census of 91. Record review of the facility's policy titled, CPAP Support, dated March 2015, showed the following information: -Used to improve arterial oxygenation in residents with respiratory insufficiency, obstructive sleep apnea, or restrictive lung disease; -Review the resident's medical record to determine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% when the facility staff made two errors in 28 opportunities resulting in an error rate of 7.14%. Facility staff failed to administer the correct dose of one medication and failed to administer one inhaler per professional nursing standards and manufacturer's specifications for one resident (Resident #311). The facility census was 91. Record review of the Symbicort (name brand for Budesonide/Formoterol inhaler) manufacturer's website dated April 2019, showed the following information: -This product is used to control and prevent symptoms caused by asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (COPD - a lung disease characterized by chronic obstruction of lung airflow that interferes with normal breathing and is not fully reversible); -Symbicort should be administered as two inhalations twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart), every day by the orally inhaled route only. -After inhalation, the patient should rinse the mouth with water, spit out the water, do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 5 of 53.1+1.9 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.0+2.0 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Apple Ridge Care CenterWaverly, MO 1 of 5Autumn Oaks Caring CenterMountain Grove, MO 1 of 5Brent B Tinnin ManorEllington, MO 1 of 5Clinton Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterClinton, MO 1 of 5Hill Crest ManorHamilton, MO 1 of 5Jefferson Health CareLees Summit, MO 1 of 5Lawson Manor & RehabLawson, MO 1 of 5Maywood Terrace Living CenterIndependence, MO 1 of 5Mountain View ManorPrescott, AZ 1 of 5Ridge Crest Nursing CenterWarrensburg, MO 1 of 5Truman Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterLamar, MO 1 of 5Valley Manor And Rehabilitation CenterExcelsior Springs, MO 2 of 5Granby HouseGranby, MO 2 of 5Lakeview Health Care & Rehabilitation CenterBoonville, MO 2 of 5Quail Run Health Care CenterCameron, MO 2 of 5Riverdell Care CenterBoonville, MO 2 of 5WestgateJoplin, MO 3 of 5Adair VillageClinton, MO 3 of 5Cotton Point Living CenterMatthews, MO 3 of 5Delhaven ManorSaint Louis, MO 3 of 5Desert Highlands Care CenterKingman, AZ 3 of 5Havasu Nursing CenterLake Havasu City, AZ 3 of 5Hunter Acres Caring CenterSikeston, MO 3 of 5Manor, ThePoplar Bluff, MO 3 of 5River Oaks Care CenterSteele, MO 3 of 5Sikeston Convalescent CenterSikeston, MO 4 of 5Heart Of The Ozarks Healthcare CenterAva, MO 4 of 5Heartland Care And Rehabilitation CenterCape Girardeau, MO 4 of 5Houston HouseHouston, MO 4 of 5Puxico Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPuxico, MO 4 of 5Riverview Nursing CenterMokane, MO 4 of 5Riverways ManorVan Buren, MO 4 of 5Southgate Living CenterCaruthersville, MO 4 of 5Yuma Nursing CenterYuma, AZ 5 of 5Shady Oaks Healthcare CenterThayer, MO

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES HOLDING COMPANY INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/1996
BEDELL, DONALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/1996
BEAIRD, TODDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
AGH1 LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2025
SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/06/2025
CASCONE, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2017
THOMAS, CYNTHIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2023
BEDELL, BRYANIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025
DCB REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
FG LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2016
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/16/2021
JOPLIN DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
MID STATES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2014
VAN DE VEN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2000

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.0M
Related-party expense27% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 54%Medicare 20%Other / private 27%

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$279per resident / day
operating cost
$8,491per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$282per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265848. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next