No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Valley Manor And Rehabilitation Center

1410 Hospital Drive, Excelsior Springs, MO 64024 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (816) 637-1010 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (816) 637-1010 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Dec 2025Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0569, F0570)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0569, F0570)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1010 N Jesse James Rd · (816) 630-6722 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1700 Rainbow Blvd · (816) 629-3667 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1645 Kearney Rd · (816) 630-1900 · Call to confirm hours
Park
104 Ross Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased29.5%18.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.8%1.1%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%2.3%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms26.4%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened34.0%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.7%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.2%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.2%17.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.9%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine5.9%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.1%26.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.6%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.832.111.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.012.331.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.0%CMS range 39.8–58.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.1%CMS range 9.3–19.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge75.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 3.7–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.771.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
0.68
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.31
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.36
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
64.0%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 66.5 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

21
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-18)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to maintain the highest practicable physical wellbeing of the residents when no annual training records were found for, Nurse Aide (NA) A, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A and CNA C, when staff failed to adhere to proper infection control practices and when the facility did not have an a infection surveillance program. The facility census was 67. The facility did not provide the requested policy on education or of staff competencies.Review of the facility's Personal Protective Equipment - Using Gloves policy, dated September 2010, showed:-Gloves are used to prevent the spread of infections;-Gloves are used to protect wounds from contamination;-Gloves are used to protect hands from infectious material;\-Wash hands after removing gloves;-Use gloves when touching excretions, secretions, blood, body fluids.Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when facility staff failed to observe proper handwashing and hairnet procedures in the kitchen, routinely sanitize food surfaces, or maintain kitchen cleanliness standards, failed to properly monitor food storage temperatures, failed to present food that was attractive on the plate, and additionally failed to properly store and monitor food items for expiration dates. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 67.Review of facility policy, Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, revised November 2022, showed:- Employees must wash their hands before coming in contact with any food surfaces, after handling raw meat, when switching from raw meat to ready to eat food, after handling soiled equipment or utensils, during food preparation as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination;-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to make a good faith attempt at utilizing the best available evidence to define and measure indicators of quality and facility goals that reflect processes of care and facility operations that have been shown to be predictive of desired outcomes for residents, when the facility did not monitor and review performance improvement plans (PIPs) for 2025 regarding resident pressure ulcers, resident snacks, and medication administration. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 67. Review of the facilities Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program policy, dated February 2020, showed:-This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents;-The objectives of the QAPI program are to: provide a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life, provide a means to establish and implement performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prioritize its improvement activities; measure the success of actions, track performance; regularly review, analyze, and act on data collected regarding the facilities performance improvement plan. The facility census was 67. Review of the facilities Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program policy, dated February 2020, showed:-This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents;-The objectives of the QAPI program are to: provide a means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life, provide a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators, reinforce and build upon effective systems and processes related to the delivery of quality care and services, establish systems through which to monitor and evaluate corrective actions. Review of Performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an effective training program for all new and existing staff was in place, when the facility failed to complete a facility assessment to include: Staff competencies and skill sets that are necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. Furthermore, the facility failed to track attendance and hours of training for staff members who required at least 12 hours of education yearly. The facility census was 67. The facility did not provide a policy on education or of staff competencies. Review of the employee files showed:Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A;-Date of hire was 11/20/24;-No documentation of required trainings was found;CNA B;-Date of hire was 6/14/24;- No documentation of required trainings was found;CNA C;- Date of hire 3/5/21;- No documentation of required trainings was found.During an interview on 12/18/25 at 1:21 P.M., the Director of Nursing said:-She did not know where the trainings were located;-She had just been hired a few weeks ago;-Staff should be observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and/or their responsible parties, in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care, when the facility failed to obtain written consent before beginning psychotropic medications (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) for three (Resident #5, Resident #9, and Resident #30) of the 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67. No policies were provided by the facility related to obtaining consent for psychotropic medications. 1.Review of Resident #9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff, dated 12/2/25, showed: - Cognition was not intact; - The resident took anti-anxiety and anti-depressant medication; - Diagnosis of depression, unspecified mood disorder, and cerebral vascular accident (a medical emergency where blood flow to the brain is suddenly blocked, commonly known as stroke). Review of the resident's care plan, revised on 10/21/25, showed: - Cognition was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to create an environment respectful of the rights of a resident to make choices about significant aspects of his/her life, when the facility did not provide a means for one resident (Resident #19) to attend Saturday church services in accordance with their religious preferences and additionally failed to post a list of food substitutes for each meal for three residents (Residents #30, #40, and #60). This affected four of 17 residents sampled. The facility census was 67.Review of facility policy, Activity Programs, revised June 2018, showed:- Activities offered are based on the comprehensive resident-centered assessment and the preferences of each resident; - The activities program is ongoing and includes facility-organized group activities, independent individual activities and assisted individual activities;- Activities are considered any endeavor that enhances cognitive or emotional health;- Individualized and group activities are provided that reflect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During an interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond that was equal or greater than one and one-half times the average monthly balance for the residents' personal funds for the last 12 consecutive months from December 2024 through November 2025. The facility census was 67. A policy regarding the Surety Bond Policy was requested and not provided;Record review on 12/17/2025 of the residents' personal funds account for the last 12 consecutive months from December 2024 to November 2025 showed:- The facility's current approved bond amount equaled $18,000- The average monthly balance for the residents' personal funds equaled $13,537.65 (which was determined using the total of each ending balance for the last 12 months bank statements plus the petty cash and divided by 12 months)- An average monthly balance of $13,537.65 ($14,000, when rounded to the nearest $1,000) required a bond of at least $21,000During an interview on 12/17/25 at 10:15 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said:- She monitors the bond amount and sends it up to corporate to ensure it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility policy and investigate a bruise of unknown origin for one resident (Resident #44) and failed to investigate an allegation of physical abuse, when one resident, (Resident #30) reported to the nurse a facility staff member had struck him/her on the leg with a wheelchair intentionally. This affected two of the 12 residents sampled. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised April 2021, showed:- The purpose of the program is to protect residents from abuse from facility staff;- Develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify abuse or mistreatment of residents;- Identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property;- Protect residents from any further harm during investigations;Review of facility policy, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised July 2017,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were created accurately for two of 17 sampled residents (Resident #10 and Resident #59) when the facility failed to address the use of a seatbelt on Resident #10's wheelchair and failed to address specific care needs, goals, and interventions for Resident #59. The facility census was 67. Review of the facilities Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered policy, dated March 2022, showed: - A comprehensive, person-centered care plan includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed for each resident; - The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), and no more than 21 days after admission; - The comprehensive, person-centered care plan describes services that are to be furnished to attain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of 17 sampled residents (Resident #13, #30 and #67) when the facility did not include activity preferences for Resident #13, did not include fall interventions for Resident #67 and when the facility did not address behaviors for Resident #30. The facility census was 67.Review of the facility's Comprehensive and Person-Centered Care Plan policy, revised March 2022, showed:-A person centered comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident;-The comprehensive, person centered care plan describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well being;-Services provided for or arranged by the facility and outlined in the comprehensive care plan are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when facility staff did not provide timely showers for three of 17 sampled residents (Resident #45, #56, and #59). The facility census was 67. Review of the facility policy, Shower/Tub bath, revised February 2018, showed:- The purpose of this procedure is to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin;- Documentation included: the date and time other shower/tub bath was performed; then name and title of the individual who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath; all assessment data (e.g. any reddened areas, sores, etc. on the resident's skin) obtained during the shower/tub bath; how the resident tolerated the shower/tub bath; if the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reasons why and the intervention taken; the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program for three of the 17 sampled residents (Resident #67, #8 and #13) when the facility staff failed to provide individualized and meaningful activities in accordance with the facility assessment and resident preferences. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's Activity Programs policy, dated June 2018, showed:-The activities program is provided to support the wellbeing of residents and to encourage both independent and community interaction;-The activities program is ongoing and includes facility organized group activities, independent individual activities and assisted individual activities;-Individual and group activities are provided; -All activities are documented in the resident's record;-Adequate space and equipment are provided to ensure that the needed services identified in the resident's plan of care are met. Review of the activity Calendar dated October 2025 showed on Monday through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper respiratory care when staff failed to document the date when oxygen tubing was cleaned for three residents (Residents #10, #18, and #56 ) and additionally failed to properly store oxygen accessories at the bedside for one resident (Resident #56) resulting in possible exposure to bacteria during oxygen usage. This affected three of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 67.No policies were provided by the facility related to oxygen tubing care or storage. 1. Review of Resident #18's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/9/25, showed:- The Resident had moderate cognitive impairment;- The Resident had been dependent on nursing staff for all cares;- Diagnosis of dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - lung and airway diseases that restrict breathing), and heart disease. Review of the Resident's Care Plan, dated 12/16/25, showed:-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls when the facility failed to ensure refrigerator temperatures were accurately checked and recorded to ensure medications were being stored at a safe temperature. This had the potential to affect all residents who received refrigerated medication. The facility census was 67.Review of the facilities Medication Labeling and Storage policy, dated February 2023, showed: -The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity, and light control; -The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manor. 1.Observation of Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] on 12/16/25 at 10:11 A.M. showed: -The temperature log for the station 4 medication room fridge was kept in a binder outside of the medication room at the nurses station; -The month of November…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when, dietary staff did not change gloves between clean and dirty tasks and when facility staff did not apply Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when they provided care and treatment for two residents (Resident #61 and Resident #46) and when the facility failed to have an infection surveillance program. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's Personal Protective Equipment – Using Gloves policy, dated September 2010, showed:-Gloves are used to prevent the spread of infections;-Gloves are used to protect wounds from contamination;-Gloves are used to protect hands from infectious material;\-Wash hands after removing gloves;-Use gloves when touching excretions, secretions, blood, body fluids. Review of the facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy dated October 2023, showed:-All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that one of two sampled residents, Resident #28, identified with a pressure ulcer, received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing when the facility failed to properly follow physician's orders when performing wound care. The facility census was 67.No policies were provided by the facility related to wound care or pressure injuries. 1. Review of Resident #28's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], showed:-No cognitive impairment;-Assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers;-At risk for pressure ulcers;-Pressure ulcer present on admit;-Diagnoses included diabetes, high blood pressure and anemia. Review of the resident's care plan dated 12/08/25, showed:-The resident had a pressure ulcer;-Provide wound care per treatment order. Review of the resident's Physician's Order Sheet (POS) dated December 2025, showed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one nurse aide (NA) A completed a nurse aide training program within four months of his/her employment in the facility. The census was 67. The facility did not provide a policy regarding Nurse Aide training. Review of Nurse Aide (NA) A's employee file showed:-Date of hire 4/21/25; -No documentation that NA A had completed a nurse aide training program was found.During an interview on 12/15/24 at 10:11 A.M., NA A said:-He/She had not passed the knowledge part of the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) test;-He/She worked as an NA only; -He/She was not sure when he/she would take the test again;-He/She was not aware he/she needed to be certified within 4 months of hire.During an interview on 12/18/25 at 1:15 P.M., the Director of Nursing said:-She was not aware that NA A had been working at the facility more than 4 months;-She was unsure why NA A was still working at the facility.During an interview on 12/18/25 at 1:25 P.M., the Administrator said:-She was not aware that NA A had been working at the facility more than 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to honor one resident's religious preferences when the facility failed to offer a suitable substitute at the lunch meal service for Resident #19, who was assessed and documented as not being able to eat pork products. This affected one out of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 67. Review of facility policy, Food and Nutrition Services, revised October 2017, showed:- The multidisciplinary staff will assess each resident's nutritional needs, food likes, dislikes and eating habits that affect eating and nutritional intake and utilization;- Reasonable efforts will be made to accommodate resident choices and food preferences;- Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident;- If an incorrect meal is provided to a resident nursing staff will report it to the food service manager so that a new food tray can be issued;1. Review of Resident #19's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program that included an antibiotic stewardship program (a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use) that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The census was 67. Review of the facility Antibiotic Stewardship policy, dated December 2016 showed:- The purpose of antibiotic stewardship is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents and to include training, orientation, and education of staff with emphasize on the importance of antibiotics stewardship, and inappropriate use of antibiotics; - Antibiotics usage and outcome will be collected and documented using a facility-approved antibiotics surveillance tracking form; - The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility wide antibiotic stewardship.The facility did not provide complete Antibiotic Stewardship…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP), who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control to be responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. The census was 67.Review of the facility Components of Infection Control policy, undated, showed:- The Infection Preventionist is a person designated to serve as a coordinator of the infection prevention and control program;- Generally, it is best to have a registered nurse in this position;- Infection Preventionist must complete the required Centers for Disease Control (CDC) course on Infection Preventionist training.Review of the facility's current Infection Preventionist's training showed:- Only modules one through 15 of the 23 module, CDC required course had been completed;- No course completion certificate was provided.During an interview on 12/17/25 at 11:44 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Infection Preventionist (IP) said:- She was not sure how to get further documentation of her IP course…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to administer medications for pain management in accordance with the resident's physician orders, which caused unnecessary pain for one Resident (Resident #1) of five sampled residents. The facility census was 63. Review of the facility policy titled, Pain Assessment and Management, revised April 2025, showed: -Establish a treatment regimen specific to the resident based on consideration of the following: a) The resident's medical condition; b) Current medication regimen; c) Nature, severity, and cause of the pain. -The medication regimen is implemented as ordered; -Ongoing communication between the prescriber and the staff is necessary for the optimal and judicious use of pain medications; -Contact the provider immediately if the resident's pain is not adequately controlled. Review of the facility's undated Medication Administration and Scheduled Medication Administration policy showed: -Scheduled medications include all maintenance doses administered according to a standard, repeated cycle of frequency and may be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when staff failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen, did not ensure refrigerator and freezer temperatures were checked daily, did not ensure proper function of dishwasher by testing and logging it daily, did not use sanitizer solution on kitchen food preparation surfaces, did not keep food stored off the floor, did not ensure proper storage and labeling of foods, and when dietary staff did not wear hairnets prior to entering kitchen. The facility census was 68. 1. Review of facility policy, food receiving and storage, revised November 2022, showed: -Dry Food Storage: -Food in designated dry storage areas are kept at least 6 inches off the floor. -Refrigerated/Frozen storage: -All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer are covered, labeled, and dated with use by date. -Refrigerated foods are stored in such a way that promote adequate air circulation around food storage containers; -Foods in walk in are stored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to respect resident rights of four residents out of the 17 sampled residents, when the facility failed to provide grooming for one resident (Resident #10), failed to respond to call lights within a timely manner for one resident (Resident #22), and additionally failed to preserve the dignity of two residents, when the staff did not provide mouth care to a dependent resident, and did not keep bedside urinal away from one resident's drinks (Resident #34, and Resident #63) The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy, undated., showed: - Residents have the right to a dignified existence, self determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. - Receive services and care outlined in the resident's care plan. - Every resident has the right to be treated with dignity and respect. Review of the facility's undated Call light policy., showed: To ensure timely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to consider the concerns and recommendations of the resident council members and failed to communicate with the council regarding their concerns as reported by seven of the eight residents who participated in a group meeting. This had the potential to affect all the residents. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's policy for recording and investigating grievances/complaints, revised April, 2017 showed, in part: - All grievances and complaints filed with the facility will be investigated and corrective actions will be taken to resolve the grievances; - Upon receiving a grievance and complaint report, the grievance and complaint report, the grievance officer will begin an investigation into the allegations; - The investigation and report will include: the date and time of the alleged incident; the circumstances surrounding the alleged incident; the location of the alleged incident; the names of any witnesses and their accounts of the alleged incident; the resident's account of the alleged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to hold residents' moneies separate from facility money when they did not reiumburse residents and/or their responsible partiies after the residents were discharged , which affected nine of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 68. Facility did not provide a policy on refunds; Review of Resident Rights Policy, undated, showed: -Resident has a right to manage their financial affairs, including right to know , in advance, what charges a facility may impose against their personal funds; -If a resident chooses to deposit personal funds with facility, upon written autohrization of a resident, facility must act as a fiduciary of resident's funds and hold, safeguard, manage, and account for all personal funds. -Facility must no timpose a charge aganist personal funds of a resident for any item or service for which payment is made under Medicaid or Medicare; -During course of a covered Medicare or Medicaid stay, facilityies must not charge a resident for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to clarify the code status (whether the resident wished to have cardio-pulmonary resuscitation- CPR) of six of the 17 sampled residents, (Resident #22,#63,#6,#18,#29, and #33), and failed to ensure the appropriate code status was listed in the medical record and care planned correctly. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's Advance Directive Policy dated April, 2013., showed: -Advance Directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy. -The physician will provide an order for Do Not Resuscitate or Full Code. -The care plan will reflect the residents treatment preferences of their Advance Directive. -The Intradisciplinary team will review the Advance Directives ongoing reviews of each residents Advance Directive as needed and yearly. -The Director of Nursing or designee will ensure that appropriate physician orders for Advance directives are obtained and documented in the resident's medical record, and plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for Resident #23, and common areas on the 200 & 300 halls. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's undated Resident Rights Policy., included the resident has the right to live in a safe, clean, and homelike enviornment. 1. Review of Resident #23's 5 Day Medicare MDS (Minimum Data Set), a mandatory assessment completed by facility staff, completed on 5/17/24., showed: -The resident was re-admitted from hospital with infected hardware from hip repair; -History of Multi Drug Resistant Organisms; -Impaired Cognition; -Assistance with all Activities of daily living (ADL); -Diagnoses: Anxiety, Delusional Disorders (altered reality), Fracture of left femur bone, Significantly impaired mobility upper and lower extremities, as well as back and spinal disorders, and Depression. Observation on 7/7/24 at 10:05 AM showed: -Resident lying on bed with no blanket, sheet only, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents knew how to file a grievance. This affected any resident wanting to file a grievance. The facility census was 68. Review of the undated resident rights, showed, in part: - Federal regulations guarantee residents certain rights and the facility must meet these requirements; - Regular in-services should include education about resident rights; - Resident has the right to voice grievances to facility or other agency that hears grievances without discrimination of reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal; - Resident has the right to and the facility must make prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances resident may have, in accordance with this paragraph; - Facility must make information on how to file a grievance or complaint available to the resident; - Facility must establish a grievance policy to ensure prompt resolution of all grievances regarding residents' rights contained in this paragraph; - Upon request, provider must give a copy of grievance policy to resident Grievance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop individualized person centered comprehensive care plans for three of 17 sampled (Resident #18, #43, and #34) when shower preferences (Resident #18), shaving and nail care preferences (Resident #43), comfort care measures (Resident #34), oral care (Resident #34), risk for skin integrity (Resident #34), repositioning of resident (Resident #34) , and therapeutic activities and psychosocial needs (Resident #34) were not care planned. The facility census was 68. Review of facility policy, Care Plans Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, showed: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. -Each resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan is consistent with the resident's rights to participate in the development and implementation of his or her plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed professional standards when staff failed to administer eye drops correctly which affected one of the 17 sampled residents, (Resident #26), failed to administer the correct dose of Tylenol (used to treat minor pain) for Resident #, failed to administer Flonase nasal spray (used to treat seasonal allergies) for Resident #21, and failed to allow the fingertip to air dry before obtaining the blood sugar for Resident #4 and #41. Additionally the staff failed to obtain a physician's order to obtain blood sugars for Resident #4. The facility census was 68. The facility did not provide a policy for administration of nasal sprays. Review of the manufacturer's guidelines for Flonase nasal spray, revised March 2016, showed, in part: - Blow your nose to clear your nostrils; - Close one nostril. Tilt your head forward slightly and keeping the bottle upright, carefully insert the nasal applicator into the other nostril; - Start to breathe in through your nose and while breathing in, press firmly and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based ob observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide complete perineal care, which affected three of the 17 sampled residents, (Resident #18, #22 and #25), failed to provide AM care for Resident #25, and failed to ensure showers were completed for for Resident #10, #18, #29 and #43. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure shaving was completed for Resident #29 and #43. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's policy for shower/tub bath, revised February, 2018, showed, in part: - The purpose of this procedure is to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin; - Documentation included: the date and time other shower/tub bath was performed; then name and title of the individual who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath; all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper techniques to reduce the possibility of accidents or injuries when staff failed to lock residents' wheelchairs during transfers (Resident #31), failed to close base of legs during transfer (Resident #31), transfering resident in a hoyer with only one staff present (Resident #6) and staff locked brakes of lift (Resident #25) which affected three of 17 sampled residents, (Resident #31, #6 and #25). The facility census was 68. Review of facility policy, Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical, dated July 2017, showed: -At least 2 nursing assistants are needed to safely move a resident with a mechanical lift. -Make sure lift is stable and locked. -Make sure all necessary equipment (slings, hooks, chiains, straps, and supports) are on hand and in good condition. -Place the sling under the resident. Visually check the size to ensure it is not too large or too small. -Lower sling bar closer to the resident. -Attach sling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained the hydration status for five of the 17 sampled residents, (Resident #1, #10, #25, #58 and #63), when staff did not pass fresh ice water to the residents or offer thickened fluids to residents on special diets during the day or overnight hours. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's policy for Resident Hydration and Prevention of Dehydration, dated October 2017 showed, in part: - The purpose is to ensure each resident maintains, to the extent possible, acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status and the facility provides nutritional and hydration care and services to each resident, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment; - Based on a resident's comprehensive assessment, the facility must ensure that each resident is offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health; - Nurses' Aides will provide and encourage intake of bedside snacks, meals, fluids,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to discard expired medications and biologicals stored within the medication room. The facility census was 68. The facility's undated policy for storage of medications showed it did not address expired medications. Observation and interview on 7/9/24 at 10:06 A.M., of the central supply cabinet showed: - Unopened bottle of Calcium 600 milligrams (mg.) with Vitamin D (supplement), expired 6/24; - Unopened bottle of Zinc Sulfate 220 mg., for dietary supplement, expired 3/24; - A box of Bisacodyl Suppositories used for constipation, expired 11/22; - The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said he/she thought Certified Medication Technician (CMT) C checked for expired medications. The expired medications should be destroyed and not used. During an interview on 7/10/24 at 12:50 P.M., the Administrator said: - Medical Records or CMT C should check for expired medications every Tuesday. There should not be expired medications in the room. We have trained staff when pulling medications to look at the expiration dates.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure meals were served to meet the needs of the residents when staff failed to prepare food according to the registered dietician approved recipes, failed to follow dietary preferences, and failed to post a list of available menu substitutions for residents. This deficient practice affected five of seventeen sampled residents, (Resident #22, #21, #48, #31 and #32) The facility census was 68. The facility did not provide a policy on menus and nutritional adequacy. 1. Review of Resident #22's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility staff), dated 5/28/24 showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Upper extremity impaired on one side; - Lower extremity impaired on both sides; - He/She required set up assistance for meals; - Diagnoses included: Paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk), Peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff served food to the residents that was palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature to the residents when hot food was not served at an appetizing temperature and burnt food was served to 10 of 17 sampled residents (Resident #21, #48, #35, #10, #27, #32, #41, #43, #3, and #32) The facility had a census of 68. Review of facility policy, food safety requirements, dated 9/1/21, showed: -Food will be stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. -When preparing food, staff shall take precautions in critical control points in food preparation process to prevent, reduce, or eliminate potential hazards. -Holding - staff shall monitor food temperatures while holding for delivery to ensure properly hot and cold holding temperatures are maintained. Staff shall refer to the current FDA food Code and facility policy for food temperatures as needed. -Ready-to eat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure infection prevention measures where followed when the facility staff failed to place three residents on enhanced barrier precautions ( Residents #63, #34, and #23) and failed to maintain proper infection prevention practices when providing care for resident with a urinary catheter (Resident #58) out of the 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's Infection Control Compliance Policy, dated August 2019., showed: - Routine monitoring and surveillance of the workplace are conducted to determine compliance with infection prevention and control policies and procedures. - The infection preventionist or designee will monitor the compliance and effectivness of the infection prevention and control practices. - Program oversight including planning, organizing, implementing, operating, monitoring, and maintenance of all elements of the program and to ensure that the facility's intradisciplinary teamis involved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program that included an antibiotic stewardship program (a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use) that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The facility census was 68. The revised facility Antibiotic Stewardship policy,dated December 2016 showed in part: The purpose of antibiotic stewardship is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents and to include training, orientation, and education of staff with emphasize on the importance of antibiotics stewardship, and inappropriate use of antibiotics. Antibiotics usage and outcome will be collected and documented using a facility-approved antibiotics surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility wide antibiotic stewardship. 1. The facility did not provide Antibiotic Stewardship…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interviews, and record review, the facility failed to serve meals according to scheduled meal times. This affected one of 17 sampled residents . This had to potential to impact all residents in the community. The facility census was 68. Review of facility policy, food safety requirements, dated 9/1/21, showed: -Foods will be stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards of food service safety; -Food and beverages shall be distributed and served to residents in a manner to prevent contamination and maintain food at the proper temperature and out of danger zone; -Timely distribution of all meals/snacks. Observation of posted meal times showed: -Dining served in dining room [ROOM NUMBER]:00 A.M., hall trays 9:00 A.M.; -Lunch served in dining room [ROOM NUMBER]:00 P.M., hall trays 1:00 P.M.; -Dinner served in dining room [ROOM NUMBER]:00 P.M., hall trays served 6:00 P.M. 1. Review of Resident #22's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services with reasonable accommadtion of the residents' rights and preferences when staff did not honor four of 15 sampled residents, (Resident #6, #8, #11, and #15) preferences for having at least two showers a week and failed to ensure staff provided bedtime snacks for four sampled residents (Residents #8, #11, #15, and #48). The facility census was 60. Review of the facility's policy for bathing and showering, revised February 2018, showed, in part, the purposes of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin. Documentation included: - The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed, the name and title of the individual who assisted the resident with the shower; all assessment data (any reddened areas, sores, etc. on the resident's skin) obtained during the shower; - If the resident refuses the shower, the reason why and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made four medication errors out of 28 opportunities for error, a medication error rate of 14.29%, which affected two of 15 sampled residents, (Resident #41 and #52). The facility census was 60. Review of the facility's policy for administering medications, revised April 2019, showed, in part: - Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; - Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Review of the facility's policy for instillation of eye drops, revised January 2014, showed, in part: - The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for instillation of eye drops to treat medical conditions, eye infections and dry eyes; - To steady the eye dropper during the instillation process, rest your hand on the bridge of the resident's nose or on his/her forehead; - When administering two or more different eye drops allow three to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure they prepared food under sanitary conditions when they failed to keep food labeled, dated, and sealed. The facility census was 60. Review of Labeling and Dating Foods (Date Marking) dated 2016 showed: -Date marking for dry storage food items o Once a case is opened, the individual food items from the case are dated. -Date marking for refrigerated storage food items o Once a case is opened, the individual, refrigerated food items are dated with the date the item was received into the facility and placed in/on the proper storage location utilizing the first in -first out method of rotation; o Once opened, all ready to eat, potentially hazardous food will be re-dated with a use by date according to current safe food storage guidelines or by the manufacturers expiration date; - Once a package is opened, it will be re-dated with the date the item was opened and shall be used by the safe food storage guidelines or by the manufacturer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents in a manner that maintained their dignity when staff stood to assist residents to eat which affected three of 15 sampled residents, (Resident #26, #27 and #261). The facility census was 60. Review of the facility's policy for dignity, revised February 2021, showed, in part: - Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his/her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem; - Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times; - The facility culture supports dignity and respect for residents by honoring resident goals, choices, preferences, values, and beliefs. This begins with the initial admission and continues throughout the resident's facility stay; - When assisting with care, residents are supported in exercising their rights. For example, residents are provided with a dignified dining experience. 1. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident or responsible party when a resident's money reaches $200 within the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) (program provides monthly payments to adults and children with a disability or blindness who have income and resources below specific financial limits. SSI payments are also made to people age [AGE] and older without disabilities who meet the financial qualifications.) resource limit ($5,301.85) in the resident trust account. This affected one resident who the facility held funds for (Resident #6). The census was 60. Review of the Resident Trust Fund Management policy dated December 2021 showed: - The facility resident funds are to be maintained in a bank checking account used exclusively for those funds. Transactions are to be handled and records are to be kept in accordance with established directives and in conformance with State and Federal requirements. Timely reporting to the Accounting Office regarding resident trust fund…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.1-2.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 4 of 51.9+2.1 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
1 of 5Apple Ridge Care CenterWaverly, MO 1 of 5Autumn Oaks Caring CenterMountain Grove, MO 1 of 5Brent B Tinnin ManorEllington, MO 1 of 5Clinton Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterClinton, MO 1 of 5Hill Crest ManorHamilton, MO 1 of 5Jefferson Health CareLees Summit, MO 1 of 5Lawson Manor & RehabLawson, MO 1 of 5Maywood Terrace Living CenterIndependence, MO 1 of 5Mountain View ManorPrescott, AZ 1 of 5Ridge Crest Nursing CenterWarrensburg, MO 1 of 5Truman Healthcare & Rehabilitation CenterLamar, MO 2 of 5Granby HouseGranby, MO 2 of 5Lakeview Health Care & Rehabilitation CenterBoonville, MO 2 of 5Quail Run Health Care CenterCameron, MO 2 of 5Riverdell Care CenterBoonville, MO 2 of 5WestgateJoplin, MO 3 of 5Adair VillageClinton, MO 3 of 5Cotton Point Living CenterMatthews, MO 3 of 5Delhaven ManorSaint Louis, MO 3 of 5Desert Highlands Care CenterKingman, AZ 3 of 5Havasu Nursing CenterLake Havasu City, AZ 3 of 5Hunter Acres Caring CenterSikeston, MO 3 of 5Manor, ThePoplar Bluff, MO 3 of 5River Oaks Care CenterSteele, MO 3 of 5Sikeston Convalescent CenterSikeston, MO 4 of 5Communities Of Wildwood RanchJoplin, MO 4 of 5Heart Of The Ozarks Healthcare CenterAva, MO 4 of 5Heartland Care And Rehabilitation CenterCape Girardeau, MO 4 of 5Houston HouseHouston, MO 4 of 5Puxico Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterPuxico, MO 4 of 5Riverview Nursing CenterMokane, MO 4 of 5Riverways ManorVan Buren, MO 4 of 5Southgate Living CenterCaruthersville, MO 4 of 5Yuma Nursing CenterYuma, AZ 5 of 5Shady Oaks Healthcare CenterThayer, MO

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES HOLDING COMPANY INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/1996
BEDELL, DONALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/06/1997
BEAIRD, TODDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
BRITTON, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2022
AGH1 LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2025
SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/06/2025
BUZARD, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1995
PEELER, NELLIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2025
BEDELL, BRYANIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025
DCB REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
EXCELSIOR REAL ESTATE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
FG LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2016
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/16/2021
MID STATES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2010
VAN DE VEN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2000

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense27% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 6%Other / private 28%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$199per resident / day
operating cost
$6,056per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$218per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265356. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next