Delhaven Manor
5460 Delmar Blvd, Saint Louis, MO 63112 · For profit - Corporation · 156 certified beds · (314) 361-2902 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569, F0570)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $73,048 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-17)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 26% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.3% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.1% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.9% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 4.1% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.3% | 17.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.3% | 25.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.9% | 90.9% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.2% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.8% | 17.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.5% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 2.4% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.26 | 2.11 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.38 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 156 beds and averages 29.2 residents a day — about 19% occupied, or roughly 127 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.94 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.69 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care services for a resident's psychosocial well-being when staff did not address the resident's behaviors, which included alcohol use and verbal/physical aggression, for one resident (Resident #2). The facility failed to address the behaviors and inform staff how to handle the resident's escalating behaviors. The sample was eight. The census was 62. The Administrator was informed on [DATE] of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE] as confirmed by surveyor on-site verification. Review of the facility's Substance Use Disorder policy dated [DATE], showed: -Residents admitted to the facility with substance use disorder (SUD) will receive the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, provided by the facility and in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and care plan; -SUD is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents requiring dialysis received services consistent with professional standards of practice when staff failed to conduct an ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments for two residents (Residents #1 and #3). The facility identified two residents receiving dialysis and problems were found with both. The sample was 3. The census was 35. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record, showed:-admission date 2/5/26;-Diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD, permanent kidney failure that requires a regular course of dialysis or a kidney transplant). Review of the resident nurse's note, dated 2/5/2026 at 1:42 P.M., showed the resident arrived via transportation from the dialysis center. They were unable to dialyze him/her due to inability to lift the resident. The resident requires Hoyer pad, not sent with him/her from the previous facility. The resident is an assist times two with a Hoyer lift. He/She refused to allow the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label, date, and cover food in the kitchen. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that kitchen equipment was clean and was in proper working order. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen. The census was 60. 1. Observations of the kitchen dry storage room, showed: -On 11/6/24 at 11:14 A.M., 11/7/24 at 4:14 P.M., and 11/8/24 at 2:46 P.M.,: -A package of opened mostaccioli noodles wrapped in plastic without a date; -A package of opened cheese flakes wrapped in plastic without a date; -On 11/6/24 at 11:14 A.M. and 11/7/24 at 4:14 P.M., a package of opened stuffing mix wrapped in plastic without a date. 2. Observation on 11/6/24 at 11:14 A.M. and 11/7/24 at 4:14 P.M., showed: -Walk in cooler: -Tortilla shells opened, wrapped in plastic, and without a date; -A salad mix opened, wrapped in plastic, and without a date; -Walk in freezer: -A box of cookies opened, undated, and exposed to the air; -Catch all freezer: -French toast in a plastic bag with a knot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-13 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient to ensure the protection of resident funds. This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents who have money in the resident trust fund. The census was 60. Review of the facility's Surety Bond Invoice, dated 12/28/23, showed a bond amount of $75000. Review of the facility's average resident trust fund balance for the previous twelve months, showed: -A monthly average of $52,000.00; -For this amount, the bond amount should have been $78,000. During an interview on 11/12/24 at 2:00 P.M., the Business Office Manager said she was not aware the amount was not sufficient and would request an increase immediately. The bond amount should have been sufficient. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 2:40 P.M., the Administrator said he was unaware the bond amount was not sufficient. The bond should be sufficient and he had the bond amount increased immediately.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to place signage and follow indications for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention that utilizes personal protective equipment (PPE) to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs)) for two residents who had pressure ulcers (open wounds that occur when skin and tissue are damaged by prolonged pressure), and an indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder into a collection bag) (Residents #42 and #38). In addition, the facility failed to ensure the indwelling urinary catheter bag was off the floor for one resident (Resident #38). Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the nebulizer mask was stored in bag or clean container when not in use for one resident (Resident #45). The sample was 18. The census was 60. Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDCs) Implementation of PPE Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of MDRO guidelines, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) forms were completed within 30 days for the final accounting for residents who expired. This affected three of three sampled residents who expired and had money in their accounts longer than 30 days (Residents #314, #315 and #316). The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #314's financial records, showed: -Expired on [DATE]; -Ending balance of $390.49; -TPL form sent on [DATE]. 2. Review of Resident #315's financial records, showed: -Expired on [DATE]; -Ending balance of $29.04; -TPL form sent on [DATE]. 3. Review of Resident #316's financial records, showed: -Expired on [DATE]; -Ending balance of $20.04; -TPL form sent on [DATE]. 4. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:42 P.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said the facility was supposed to send the TPL form within 30 days. The BOM started working at the facility in June of last year and realized TPLs were not sent. It was not acceptable to send the funds later…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure the residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff) accurately reflect the residents' status for two of 26 sampled residents (Resident #57 and #60). The census was 60. 1. Review of Resident #57's significant change MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -admitted to the facility: [DATE]; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, aphasia (language disorder that affects a person's ability to understand, speak, read and write), and depression; -Special services received while a resident: Hospice Care; -Does the resident have a condition or chronic disease that may result in life expectancy less than six months: No; -Staff failed to accurately document the resident's condition resulted in a life expectancy of less than six months necessitating hospice services. Review of the resident's physician order sheet, dated [DATE], showed an order dated [DATE], for Hospice care. Review of the resident's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who received dialysis (the clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) had documented assessments and monitoring related to dialysis and ongoing documented communication with the dialysis center. The facility identified two residents who received dialysis, and one resident was sampled (Resident #53). In addition, the facility failed to have a copy of the dialysis contract. The sample was 18. The census was 60. Review of the facility's Care of a Resident with End-Stage Renal Disease Policy, dated reviewed 10/12/24, showed: -Policy statement: residents with end stage renal disease (ESRD, chronic irreversible kidney failure) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care; -Staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving dialysis care outside the facility, shall be trained in the care and special needs of these residents; -Education and training of staff includes, specially: -The nature and clinical management of ESRD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 37 opportunities observed, three errors occurred resulting in an 8.11% error rate (Resident #50). The census was 60. Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy, undated, showed: -Only licensed personnel or certified medical technicians (CMT) are assigned responsibility of preparing, administering, and recording medication or permitted access to drug storage areas; -Medication may be administered to a resident only if ordered by a practitioner licensed to prescribe medication in that location. Review of the facility's Administering Medications through a Metered Dose Inhaler Policy, dated reviewed 10/1/24, showed: -Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of inhaled medications; -Allow at least one minute between inhalations of the same medication and at least two minutes between inhalations of different medications. 1. Review of Resident #50's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0839 — patternEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
See the deficiency cited at F839 under event ID G60Z12. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff transporting residents in the company vehicle held the proper driver license in accordance with Missouri state regulations, for one of one days of observation. This had the ability to affect all residents who were transported in the facility vehicles. The census was 61. Review of the Missouri State Driver's Guide, revised August 2023, showed the following: -A Class F license is Missouri's basic driver license and is needed to operate any motor vehicle other than one requiring the driver to have a Class A, B, C or E license. -Anyone who transports 14 or fewer passengers for pay or as part of his/her job must have a class E license; -Anyone who regularly operates a motor vehicle for his or her employment, that belongs to another person and is designed to carry freight and merchandise, must also have a Class E license. Review of the facility's transportation escort job description, showed the following: -Duties: Escort patients to medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
See the deficiency cited at F850 under event ID G60Z12. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis. The facility was licensed and certified for 156 residents. The current census was 61. Review of the facility's license and certification records, showed the facility licensed for 156 beds, of which 156 beds were certified for Medicaid and Medicare. Review of the facility's Social Worker's job description, showed the following: -The primary purpose of this position is to assist in planning, organizing, implementing, evaluating, and directing the overall operation of the facility's Social Services Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations, our established policies and procedures, and as may be directed by the Director of Social Services and/or Administrator, to assure the medically related emotional and social needs of the resident are met/maintained on an individual basis; -Experience: Must have, as a minimum, a bachelor's degree in social work or a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-17 · tag F0839 — patternEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff transporting residents in the company vehicle held the proper driver license in accordance with Missouri state regulations, for one of one days of observation. This had the ability to affect all residents who were transported in the facility vehicles. The census was 61. Review of the Missouri State Driver's Guide, revised August 2023, showed the following: -A Class F license is Missouri's basic driver license and is needed to operate any motor vehicle other than one requiring the driver to have a Class A, B, C or E license. -Anyone who transports 14 or fewer passengers for pay or as part of his/her job must have a class E license; -Anyone who regularly operates a motor vehicle for his or her employment, that belongs to another person and is designed to carry freight and merchandise, must also have a Class E license. Review of the facility's transportation escort job description, showed the following: -Duties: Escort patients to medical appointments and other areas of the facility; -Requirements:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-17 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full-time basis. The facility was licensed and certified for 156 residents. The current census was 61. Review of the facility's license and certification records, showed the facility licensed for 156 beds, of which 156 beds were certified for Medicaid and Medicare. Review of the facility's Social Worker's job description, showed the following: -The primary purpose of this position is to assist in planning, organizing, implementing, evaluating, and directing the overall operation of the facility's Social Services Department in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations, our established policies and procedures, and as may be directed by the Director of Social Services and/or Administrator, to assure the medically related emotional and social needs of the resident are met/maintained on an individual basis; -Experience: Must have, as a minimum, a bachelor's degree in social work or a bachelor's degree in a human services field including but not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record for all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for four out of four narcotic count books reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents with controlled substance orders. The census was 64. Review of the facility's Controlled Substances policy, revised November 2022, showed: -Dispensing and Reconciling Controlled Substances: -Controlled substance inventory if monitored and reconciled to identify loss or potential diversion in a manner that minimizes the time between loss/diversion and detection/follow-up; -Nursing staff count controlled medication inventory at the end of each shift, using these records to reconcile the inventory count; -The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty make the count together and document and report any discrepancies to the director of nursing services. 1. Review of the controlled drug count sheets for the 1st Certified Medication Technician (CMT) cart, dated 5/1/24 through 5/31/24, showed: -No outgoing staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's right to be free from physical abuse was not violated (Resident #4) when a resident (Resident #5) hit the other resident in the face. The sample was 5. The census was 62. Review of the facility's Residents Rights policy, revised 2/2021, showed: -Be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation; -Includes, but is not limited to, humiliation, harassment, threats of punishment or deprivation. Review of the facility's abuse and investigation and reporting policy, revised 7/2017, showed: -All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigation will also be reported; -Policy interpretation and implementation: -The Administrator will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice by not following the physician orders for two residents (Resident #1 and #4). The facility failed to administer all medication as ordered and did not document the reasons for the omissions. The sample was 5. The census was 62. Review of the facility's Medication orders policy revised November 2014, showed; Policy: The purpose of this procedure is to establish uniform guidelines in the receiving and recording of medication orders. -Each resident must be under the care of a Licensed physician authorized to practice medicine in this state and must be seen by the physician at least every sixty (60) days; -A current list of orders must be maintained in the clinical record of each resident; -Orders must be written and maintained in chronological order. Review of the facility's administering medications policy, revised 2019, showed: Policy: Medications are administered in a safe and safe and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice by not following the physician orders for Resident #4. The facility failed to administer his/her medication and did not document the reasons and notification to the physician. The sample was 5. The census was 62. Review of the facility's Medication orders policy, revised November 2014, showed; -Policy: The purpose of this procedure is to establish uniform guidelines in the receiving and recording of medication orders; -Each resident must be under the care of a Licensed physician authorized to practice medicine in this state and must be seen by the physician at least every sixty (60) days; -A current list of orders must be maintained in the clinical record of each resident; -Orders must be written and maintained in chronological order. Review of the facility's administering medications policy, revised 2019, showed: -Policy: Medications are administered in a safe and safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; -Staffing schedules are arranged to ensure that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs and preferences for one resident when staff failed to assist him/her out of bed when he/she requested (Resident #1). The sample size was 3.The census was 60. Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Supporting policy, last reviewed by the facility 2/6/24, showed: -Policy Statement: Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: -Mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking); -Care and services to prevent and/or minimize functional decline will include appropriate pain management, as well as treatment for depression and symptoms of depression; -Interventions to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to address the resident's specific needs, which included fall interventions. The staff failed to conduct fall investigations to determine fall causes and interventions for 3 of 3 falls. In addition, the faclity failed to revise the resident's care plan to address his/her change in mood and access to socialization (Resident #1). The sample size was 3. The census was 60. Review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 3/2022, showed: -Policy Statement: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident; -Policy Interpretation and Implementation: -The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident; -The care plan interventions are derived…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify potential safety hazards for one resident's environment, who staff assessed as being unable to move while in bed, when the staff left the bed remote control under the resident's back (Resident #1). The resident's back applied pressure to the bed remote control and caused it to elevate to the highest position. This resulted in a one centimeter laceration of the head and a C-2 (a break in the second vertebra of the neck) neck fracture. In the two weeks following this fall with injury, the resident had two additional falls. The facility failed to investigate and implement additional safety interventions after each fall. The sample size was 7. The census was 60. Review of the facility's Falls-Clinical Protocol, revised 3/2018, showed: -Assessment and recognition: -The physician will help identify individuals with a history of falls and risk factors for falling; -The staff and physician will document in the medical record a history of one or more recent falls; -While many falls are isolated individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to promote one of seven sampled resident's highest possible level of well-being, to assure the emotional and social needs of the resident were met/maintained. The facility also failed to address the resident's mental and psychosocial needs thoroughly, which negatively impacted him/her, causing feelings of isolation and sadness (Resident #1). The sample was 7. The census was 60. Review of the facility's Social Service Designee documentation policy, dated 2003, showed: -The primary purpose of your job position is to assist in planning, developing, organizing, implementing, evaluating, and directing our facility's social service programs in accordance with current existing federal, state, and local standards, as well as our established policies and procedures, to assure that the medically related emotional and social needs of the resident are met/maintained on an individual basis; -Administrative functions: -Record and maintain regular social service progress notes indicating response to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
See the deficiency cited at event ID RFBY12. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The staffing sheets were reviewed for the month of August, 2023 and no RN was scheduled for the weekend. The census was 60. Review of the facility's August 2023 staff schedule, reviewed on 8/25/23, showed: -No staff listed under the job description of RN supervisor; -Every shift identified the nurses working as Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs); -No RNs scheduled; -Weekend dates with no RN coverage included 8/5, 8/6, 8/12, 8/13, 8/19, and 8/20/23. During an interview on 8/25/23 at 10:23 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said she began employment at the facility in July 2023. He/She typically works Monday through Friday. The facility does not have an RN scheduled on the weekends. During an interview on 8/25/23 at 10:32 A.M., the staffing coordinator said she will refer questions about RN staffing to the DON. During an interview on 8/25/23 at P.M., the Administrator said they do not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. The staffing sheets were reviewed for the month of August, 2023 and no RN was scheduled for the weekend. The census was 60. Review of the facility's August 2023 staff schedule, reviewed on 8/25/23, showed: -No staff listed under the job description of RN supervisor; -Every shift identified the nurses working as Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs); -No RNs scheduled; -Weekend dates with no RN coverage included 8/5, 8/6, 8/12, 8/13, 8/19, and 8/20/23. During an interview on 8/25/23 at 10:23 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said she began employment at the facility in July 2023. He/She typically works Monday through Friday. The facility does not have an RN scheduled on the weekends. During an interview on 8/25/23 at 10:32 A.M., the staffing coordinator said she will refer questions about RN staffing to the DON. During an interview on 8/25/23 at P.M., the Administrator said they do not use agency staff. The facility has job…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of Resident #110's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed Resident #110 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident #110 was independent with bed mobility, transfers, and locomotion and required extensive assistance from staff with toilet use and personal hygiene. The MDS indicated Resident #110 was always continent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel. According to the MDS, Resident #110 had almost constant pain that the resident described as severe; the resident received a scheduled pain medication regimen. The MDS indicated that Resident #110 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injuries. A review of Resident #110's Care Plan, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews and record reviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide quarterly financial statements to 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #24) of 24 residents who had resident trust accounts with the facility. The facility census was 57. Findings included: 1. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Sheet (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/29/2023, indicated the facility readmitted Resident #2 on 08/06/2019 with active diagnoses that included hypertension, diabetes, and depression. The MDS also indicated Resident #2 was cognitively intact, with a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). During an interview on 06/26/2023 at 11:00 AM, Resident #2 stated they did not receive a quarterly statement for their resident trust account. A review of an Open Balance Report, dated 06/28/2023, revealed a list of residents who had trust accounts with the facility. Resident #2 was listed on the report, indicating they had a trust account with the facility. During an interview on 06/29/2023 at 4:50 PM, the Administrator stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs) were accurately completed upon admission for 2 (Resident #8 and Resident #54) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 had a Level I PASARR completed prior to admission and failed to ensure Resident #54's Level I PASARR was accurate and included mental illness diagnoses upon admission. The facility census was 57. Finding included: Review of a facility policy titled, admission Criteria, revised in March 2019, indicated, Our facility admits only residents whose medical and nursing care needs can be met. Further review of the policy revealed the objectives of the facility's admission criteria were to, e. assure that the facility receives appropriate medical and financial records prior to or upon the resident's admission. Although requested, a policy specific to PASARR was not provided. 1. A review of Resident #8's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) necessary to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #23 and Resident #308) of 17 sampled residents reviewed for assistance with ADL care. Specifically, Resident #23 and Resident #308 had fingernails that were long with dirty substances underneath the nails. The facility census was 57. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, revised 03/2018, indicated, Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. The policy indicated, 2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and facility document and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide treatment to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 (Resident #23) of 2 residents reviewed for limited range of motion. The facility census was 57. Findings included: Review of facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing Services, revised in 07/2017, indicated, Residents will receive restorative nursing care as needed to help promote optimal safety and independence. 1. Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitation services (e.g., physical, occupational, or speech therapies). 2. Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay or when discharged from rehabilitative care. 5. Restorative goals may include, but are not limited to supporting and assisting the resident in: b. Developing, maintaining or strengthening his/her physiological and psychological resources. Review of a facility policy titled, Resident Mobility and Range…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services, and failed to ensure ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility were completed for 1 (Resident #44) of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 57. Findings included: Review of Resident #44's Face Sheet revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included end stage renal disease. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/17/2023, revealed Resident #44 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Per the MDS, Resident #44 was receiving dialysis treatment. Review of Resident #44's Care Plan with a problem onset date of 05/23/2023, revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to provide evidence of adequate monitoring for the effects of and/or responses to psychotropic medications for 1 (Resident #49) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 57. Finding included: A review of a facility policy titled, Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring, revised in 03/2019, indicated, 3. The nursing staff will identify, document, and inform the physician about specific details regarding changes in an individual's mental status, behavior, and cognition, including: a. onset, duration, intensity and frequency of behavioral symptoms. A review of Resident #49's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident on 08/13/2022 with diagnoses that included other specified depressive episodes. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/14/2023, revealed Resident #49 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident had intact cognition. Per the MDS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #44) of 3 residents who received insulin were free from significant medication errors. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff administered Resident #44's insulin as ordered by the physician. The facility census was 57. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, revealed, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. The policy further indicated If a dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident, or a medication has been identified as having potential adverse consequences for the resident or is suspected of being associated with adverse consequences, the person preparing or administering the medication will contact the prescriber, the resident's attending physician or the facility's medical director to discuss the concerns. A review of a Face Sheet indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-11 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident requests for less than $100.00 ($50.00 for Medicaid residents) were honored within the same day by not assuring residents had access to their trust account on the weekends. This deficient practice affected all the residents who had a resident trust account. The facility also failed to keep resident trust fund (RTF) accounts from being overdrawn for eight residents (Residents #214, #216, #217, #215, #212, #213, #30 and #52). The census was 59. 1. During the resident council group interview on 10/8/19 at 11:00 A.M., six out of six residents agreed the facility does not offer RTF banking hours on the weekends. Observation of the door to the facility business office, showed a sign posted stating, New bank hours: Monday through Friday 10 A.M. -12 P.M. and 2 P.M - 4 P.M. During an interview on 10/9/19 at 11:41 A.M., the administrator said the RTF bank hours were Monday through Friday 10 A.M. -12 P.M. and 2 P.M - 4 P.M. She was not aware residents should have access to funds over the weekend. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-11 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure general accounting principles were followed, when they failed to provide documentation regarding quarterly resident trust fund statements. This affected all residents for whom the facility held funds. The census was 59. During the resident council group interview on 10/8/19 at 11:00 A.M., five out of six residents, whom the facility identified as cognitively intact, agreed the facility did not provide resident trust fund quarterly statements. No one knew their resident trust balance. During an interview on 10/9/19 at 12:38 P.M., the corporate bookkeeper and administrator said there was no documentation of quarterly statements being provided for the last quarter. Typically, they had residents sign the statements, but there was nothing on file to show statements were provided to the residents during the last quarter.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-11 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the bond amount for at least one and one-half times the average monthly balance of the residents' personal funds for the last twelve consecutive months from September 2018 to August 2019. The census was 59. Record review on 10/10/19 of the residents' personal funds account for the last twelve consecutive months from September 2018 to August 2019 showed the following: -The facility could not provide a reconciled bank statement for July 2019; - The facility's current approved bond amount equaled $35,000.00; - The average monthly balance for the residents' personal funds equaled $27,533.67; - An average monthly balance of $27,533.67 required a bond of at least $42,000.00. During an interview on 10/10/19 at 12:46 P.M., the corporate bookkeeper said the current bond amount was insufficient. The facility should increase the bond to $50,000.00 for sufficient coverage.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans reflected residents' current needs by not updating them to include a new pressure ulcer (pressure injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or friction), new/additional fall interventions and a resident's risk of pressure ulcers, including treatment and interventions, for three (Residents #5, #37 and #45) of 15 sampled residents. The census was 59. 1. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/10/19, showed the following: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Dependent on staff for all mobility and personal care; -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Risk of developing pressure ulcers: YES; -No skin breakdown; -Diagnoses included muscular sclerosis (MS-a chronic disease of the central nervous system that affects the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained diagnoses for antibiotics and psychotropic medications, clarify the dose of a heparin (blood thinner) flush, obtain code status (full code-all life preserving methods are performed, or no code-no life preserving methods are performed) orders, obtain the liter (L) flow for continuous oxygen administration, provide a diagnosis for the use of a supra-pubic catheter (SP cath-a small tube surgically inserted through the lower abdominal wall into the bladder to drain urine), follow up with the physician regarding a dietician's recommendations, and follow a physician's order for the use of heel protectors. This affected four residents (Residents #260, #259, #210 and #45). The sample size was 15. The census was 59. 1. Review of Resident #260's face sheet, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included diabetes, heart disease,stroke, high blood pressure, sepsis (a serious illness that happens…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their smoking policy by allowing two residents (Residents #12 and #38) to keep cigarettes and a lighter on their persons. The facility also failed to prevent resident access to razors by not removing razors from one resident's room (Resident #210) and allowing storage of razors in an unlocked cabinet drawer in the hall of the 3rd floor. The facility also failed to repair a call light in the 3rd floor shower room, which left exposed wires. The census was 59. Review of the facility's Smoking Policy, dated 9/21/17, showed the following: -All smokers will be supervised by staff to smoke; -All resident cigarettes are stored in container at the main reception desk on the first floor; -Cigarettes are given to the residents inside the smoke room only; -Residents are not allowed to be in possession of lighters and/or matches while inside the facility; -The policy did not state how staff would determine if a resident was safe to engage in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-11 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide thorough assessments, orders, monitoring and ongoing communication with the dialysis (the clinical purification of blood by dialysis as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) center for three residents (Residents #49, #22 and #45). The facility identified four residents who received dialysis. Three of them were chosen for the sample of 15 and issues were found with all three of them. The census was 59. 1. Review of Resident #47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/15/19, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Total dependence on staff for most activities of daily living (ADLs); -Upper extremity impairment on one side; -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Received dialysis; -Diagnoses included diabetes and depression. Review of the resident's care plan, updated on 7/20/19, showed the following: -Problem: Required renal dialysis on Monday,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in a sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation by not ensuring nursing staff signed at the beginning and end of each nursing shift, for two of four narcotic count books checked. The census was 59. 1. Review of the 300 Hall nurse's narcotic count sheet, dated October 2019, showed the following: -From 10/1 through 10/6/19, a total of 10 shifts without the on-coming nursing staff signature and/or initials for counting narcotics; -From 10/1 through 10/6/19, a total of 10 shifts without the off-going nursing staff signature and/or initials for counting narcotics. 2. Review of the 300 Hall Certified Medication Technician (CMT) narcotic count sheet, dated October 2019, showed the following: -From 10/1 through 10/6/19, a total of 5 shifts without on-coming CMT's signature and/or initials for counting narcotics; -From 10/1 through 10/6/19, a total of 4 shifts without off-going CMT's signature and/or initials for counting narcotics. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow puree recipes to ensure food was prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value and flavor, for seven of seven residents who received pureed diets. The census was 59. 1. Observation on 10/8/19 at 10:05 A.M., showed [NAME] J stood at a kitchen counter and said he/she would puree seven servings of spaghetti and meatballs, and zucchini for the lunch meal. The blender bowl sat on the counter and contained pasta. [NAME] J said he/she put four tongs full of pasta in the bowl, which was about 8 ounces (oz). He/she added two, 6 oz. (12 oz. total) scoops of spaghetti sauce with an unknown number of meat balls. [NAME] J washed his/her hands, donned gloves and added 2 teaspoons of chicken base to two cups of hot water and stirred the mixture. [NAME] J turned on the blender and added approximately one-half cup of chicken broth. [NAME] J stirred the mixture, added the rest of the liquid, turned the blender back on and continued to blend. The puree tasted strongly like pasta, with a slight taste of the sauce and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was dated when placed in the walk-in refrigerator. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who ate at the facility. The census was 59. 1. Observation of the walk in refrigerator, showed the following: -On 10/7/19 at 10:31 A.M. and 5:30 P.M., and 10/8/19 at 10:05 A.M., two large pork tenderloins and four approximate 5 pound (lb) rolls of ground beef sat, undated, on a tray on the bottom shelf; -On 10/9/19 at 2:41 P.M., the pork tenderloins and four rolls of ground beef had a sticker, dated 10/9/19; -On 10/10/19 at 1:21 P.M., four rolls of ground beef, dated 10/9/19, remained on the tray on the bottom shelf and two pork tenderloins were gone. 2. Observation of the reach-in cooler, showed the following: -On 10/7/19 at 3:50 P.M., two boxes of thawed health shakes, dated 10/4/19 with black marker, sat on the shelf; -On 10/8/19 at 10:05 A.M., a box, dated 10/11/19, containing nine thawed strawberry health shakes, sat on the shelf along with an unopened box of chocolate health shakes, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-11 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice in the development of a coordinated plan of care for residents receiving hospice care. The facility also failed to maintain documentation of a continuation of services provided when one hospice provider went out of business, until the resident was admitted to another provider (Resident #15). The facility identified two residents who received hospice care. Both residents were included in the sample of 15, and problems were found with each of them (Residents #15 and #37). The census was 59. 1. Review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 7/15/19, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Required staff supervision for mobility and personal care; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, dementia, depression and chronic lung disease; -Life expectancy of less than six months: NO Review of the care plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-10-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident call light system remained functional for four of four shower rooms on the second floor and one shower room on the third floor. This affected all residents who showered in those shower rooms. The census was 59. 1. Observations on 10/7/19 at 11:39 A.M., 10/9/19 at 7:35 A.M., 10/10/19 at 7:35 A.M. and 1:26 P.M. and 10/11/19 at 7:00 A.M., of the third floor unlocked shower room across the hall from room [ROOM NUMBER], showed the call light detached from the wall and not in working order. 2. Observations on 10/11/19 of the second floor shower rooms, showed the following: -At 7:13 A.M., the shower room across from room [ROOM NUMBER] did not sound or light up outside the door when the string was pulled; -At 7:14 A.M., the shower room across from room [ROOM NUMBER] did not light up outside the door when the string was pulled; -At 7:16 A.M., the shower room across from room [ROOM NUMBER] did not sound or light up outside the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, regarding life expectancy for one resident (Resident #15) and tracheostomy (trach, an opening in the neck to place a tube in the windpipe that allows air to enter the lungs) and the use of oxygen for one resident (Resident #46). The sample size was 15. The census was 59. 1. Review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Supervision required for mobility and personal care; -Diagnoses included diabetes, dementia and chronic lung disease; -Life expectancy of less than six months: NO. Review of the medical record, showed he/she admitted to hospice on 2/21/18. Review of the care plan, dated 2/21/18 and last updated 9/10/19, showed the following: -Problem: Resident has chosen to receive hospice services; -Goal: Resident will experience a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 26 opportunities, two errors occurred resulting in 7.69% medication error rate (Resident #38). The census was 59. Review of Resident #38's physician's order sheet (POS), dated 10/7/19 through 11/6/19, showed the following: -Diagnoses included high blood pressure and muscle spasms; -An order, dated 8/11/18, to administer Lisinopril (medication used to treat high blood pressure) 20 milligrams (mg), one tablet daily (scheduled administration time 9:00 A.M.) and Baclofen (medication used to treat muscle spasms) 10 mg, one tablet twice daily (BID) (scheduled administration times 9:00 A.M. and 1:00 P.M.). Observation on 10/7/19 at 10:35 A.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) A administered the resident's medication, except Lisinopril 20 mg tablet and Baclofen 10 mg tablet, due to medications not available for administration. During an interview on 10/7/19 at 11:05 A.M., CMT A said the resident's Lisinopril and Baclofen medications were ordered from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-11-13 · tag F0574 — widespreadThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide accessible information on the location of the State Survey Agency hotline number that was readily available to residents in the facility without assistance. The census was 60. Observations throughout the survey on 11/ 7/24, 11/8/24 and 11/12/24 showed, the State Survey Agency number not posted in the facility. During a group interview on 11/8/24 at 9:55 A.M., seven residents, whom the facility identified as alert and oriented, attended the group meeting and said they did not know where the State Survey Agency hotline number was posted. During an interview on 11/12/24 at 3:17 P.M., the Director of Nursing said the State contact information was not posted. The facility has ordered a new poster and frame. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 2:40 P.M., the Administrator said he would expect for the State Survey Agency hotline number to be posted.
- No harm found · B2019-10-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a dignified and homelike dining experience for residents who dined in the second and third floor dining rooms by leaving the plates and glasses on cafeteria style trays and leaving plate lids on the tables during meals. The sample size was 15. The census was 59. 1. Observations on 10/7/19 at 11:18 A.M., 10/8/19 at 7:53 A.M., 10/9/19 at 7:39 A.M., 10/10/19 at 8:00 A.M. and 10/11/19 at 7:43 A.M., showed residents seated at the dining room tables on the second floor. Staff served the meals on trays and did not remove the cafeteria style trays from beneath the plates. 2. Observations on 10/7/19 at 11:18 A.M., 10/8/19 at 7:43 A.M., 10/9/19 at 7:35 A.M. and 12:20 P.M., 10/10/19 at 7:34 A.M. and 10/11/19 at 7:14 A.M., showed residents seated at the dining room tables on the third floor. Staff served the meals on trays and did not remove the cafeteria style trays from beneath the plates. Staff also piled the lids of the plates in the middle of the tables. 3. During an interview on 10/11/19 at 9:35 A.M., the administrator and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2019-10-11 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's bed hold policy to residents or their legal representatives, at the time of the transfers, for six of 15 sampled residents who were transferred to the hospital for medical reasons (Residents #12, #46, #40, #45, #41 and #22). The census was 59. Review of the facility's Bed-Hold and Return policy, revised in March 2017, showed prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy. 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record, showed the following: -admission date of 7/9/09; -Order to discharge to hospital 8/31/19; -readmission to facility 9/2/19; -No documentation the resident and/or their representative received written notice of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the transfer. 2. Review of Resident #46's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, admission and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$73,048 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $73,048 — penalty dated 2024-06-17
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-16 for 5 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.0 | +2.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 1.9 | +3.1 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES HOLDING COMPANY INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 08/07/2002 |
| BEDELL, DONALD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/07/2002 |
| BEAIRD, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| AGH1 LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/06/2025 |
| JACKSON, THOMAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/15/2024 |
| LABONTE, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2005 |
| BEDELL, BRYAN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/02/2025 |
| FG LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2016 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/16/2021 |
| MID STATES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2010 |
| VAN DE VEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2000 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 96% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265392. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.