Westgate

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 105.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care to promote the prevention and healing of pressure ulcers when staff failed to assess, monitor, document, and notify the physician for at least 17 days of a newly acquired Stage 4 (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone) pressure ulcer that developed on one resident's (Resident #1) sacrum (the triangular bone located above the tailbone) which resulted in the resident requiring prolonged antibiotic treatment for probable osteomyelitis (an infection and inflammation of the bone typically caused by bacteria or fungi) and when staff failed to complete a wound treatment per physician order, and timely assess, document and notify the physician of five newly acquired pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident #2) in a selected sample of 10 residents. The facility's census was 100 residents.The Administrator was notified on 06/03/26, at 7:23 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 05/05/26. The IJ was removed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents received adequate supervision to prevent possible accidents when staff failed to respond to an alarm when one resident (Resident #1) left the facility at night, was found by a neighboring facility's staff, and suffered a fall with injury, and when the facility staff failed to have a process in place, and ensure all staff were trained on the process, to routinely check wander prevention devices to ensure they worked correctly for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2). The facility had a census of 101. Review of a facility policy titled, Wandering and Elopements, revised March 2019, showed the following information: -The facility is to identify residents at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents; -Residents identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety issues will have strategies and interventions to maintain the residents safety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care to promote the prevention and healing of skin breakdown when staff failed to timely and accurately assess and document related to Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD-inflammation and skin erosion caused by prolonged exposure to bodily fluids such as urine and feces) for one resident (Resident #3) in a selected sample of 10 residents. The facility's census was 100 residents. Review of the facility's Wound and Skin Care Protocol, revised November 2024, showed the following information:-Purpose to promote a systematic approach and monitoring process for the care of residents with existing wounds and for those who are at risk for skin breakdown. This protocol serves as a tool for treatment options for the staff member to utilize;-The Director of Nursing (DON) at each facility is responsible for informing and educating the attending physicians and the facility's Medical Director regarding facility wound care protocols. It will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident's (Resident #1) right to be free from physical abuse by staff when one staff (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A) physically pushed the resident's face. The facility census was 109.Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident's (Resident #1) right to be free from physical abuse by staff when one staff (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A) physically pushed Resident #1's face. The facility census was 109. On 01/08/26, facility management became of the noncompliance that occurred on 01/08/26. The facility reported the allegation, began an investigation, took steps to protect the residents, and began facility-wide in-service regarding abuse, neglect, dignity, and respect; began monitoring the resident for any psychosocial changes; and began monitoring the resident's skin for any new bruising, redness, or other concerns. The facility put plans in place to provide training on behavior interventions for the next three months and added the noncompliance to their Quality…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed ensure all residents were treated with dignity and respect when one staff (Licensed Practical Nurse D) grabbed one resident's arm (Resident #1) and grabbed food out of the resident's hand. The facility's census was 109.Review of the facility's policy titled Dignity, revised February 2021, showed the following:-Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances his or her sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feelings of self-worth and self-esteem;-Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times;-Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited;-Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents;-Staff are expected to treat cognitively impaired residents with dignity and sensitivity, addressing underlying motives or root causes for a behavior.1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following:-admission date of 04/16/25;-Diagnoses included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record keeping to ensure all controlled substances (substances that have an accepted medical use (medications which fall under US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Schedules II-V), have a potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence) were accurately accounted for when staff did not accurately document all administrations of and could not easily reconcile the balance of a controlled medication for one resident (Resident #1) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 110. The facility Administrator and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) were notified of the Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 11/28/24. The facility staff began an investigation on 12/12/24 when the medication reconciliation error was found. The facility began immediate in-servicing of all staff who were on-site and as they arrived for work prior to beginning their shift. The facility also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment for all residents when staff failed to maintain the cleanliness of the the bathrooms of six residents (Resident's #51, #89, #32, #36, #39 and #102). The facility census was 108. Review showed the facility did not provide a policy that related to cleaning and maintain the bathrooms in residents' rooms. Review of the facility's cleaning sheet titled, Housekeeping 3 (300 hall), undated, showed the following: -Five step procedure for rooms included pull trash/sanitize can/replace liner, horizontal surfaces, vertical surfaces, dust mop, and damp mop; -Seven step procedure for bathrooms included check/refill supplies, pull trash/sanitize can/replace liner, dust mop/sweep, clean sink area/tub, clean commode/base, clean walls/partitions, and damp mop; -At 8:15 A.M., begin regular day cleaning on resident rooms 301, 303, 305, and 307 using five step/seven step procedure; -At 10:00 A.M., continue regular day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications were stored per standards of practice when staff walked away and out of view of an unlocked medication cart containing resident medications. The facility census was 108. Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, revised 12/12, showed during administration of medications, the medication cart will be kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse 1. Observation on 06/05/24, beginning at 2:45 P.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D prepared medications for multiple residents and placed the cups containing the medication in the top drawer of the medication cart. The CMT then walked away from the medication cart without locking the care. The CMT walked to dining room approximately twenty-five feet away and turned his/her back to medication cart to check a blood pressure of a resident. The CMT was in not in line of sight of the unlocked medication cart. During an interview on 06/06/24, at 9:00 A.M., CMT E said he/she always locks the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medical records were maintained in a confidential fashion when staff left the computer on medication cart unlocked, unattended, and visible to other for one resident (Resident #5). The facility census was 108. 1. Review of Resident # 5's face sheet showed the following information: -admission date of 05/06/24; -Diagnosis included hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 06/06/24, showed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Observations on 06/05/24, starting at 2:45 P.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D prepared medication for the resident. CMT D then walked away from the medication cart with the computer screen showing patient information, including medication orders. CMT D walked to dining room approximately twenty-five feet away and turned his/her back to medication cart to check the resident's blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to share a room with his or her roommate of choice and the right to receive written notice of the room change, including the reason, were protected when staff moved one resident (Resident #1) to a room on a different hall without a written notice issued or documentation of the resident's consent to the change. The facility had a census of 105. Review of the facility's policy titled, Room Change/Roommate Assignment, revised March 2021, showed the following information: -Resident room or roommate assignments may change if the facility deems it necessary. Resident preferences are taken into account when such changes are considered; -Room changes initiated by the facility are limited to moves within the same building in which the resident currently resides, unless the resident voluntarily agrees to move to another building within the same facility; -Residents have the right to share a room with their roommate of choice, including a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with standards of practice when staff failed to document a fall or complete post fall monitoring for one resident (Resident #3's) who suffered fall, resulting in a possible delay of identification of injury of a hip fracture. The facility census was 101. Review of a facility policy titled, Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting, revised July 2017, showed the following: -All accidents and incidents involving residents are to be investigated and reported to the Administrator; -The nurse supervisor, charge nurse, department director, or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident; -The incident will be reviewed by the safety committee for trends related to accident or safety hazards in the facility and analyze any individual resident vulnerabilities. 1. Review of Resident #3's face sheet (basic information sheet) showed the following information: -admission date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provided showers as preferred for nine residents (Resident #5, #13, #16, #39, #41, #68, #69, #74, and #78). The facility census was 89. Record review of the facility's policy titled Resident Bathing, undated, showed the staff shall provide person-centered care that emphasizes the resident's comfort, independence and personal needs and preferences. 1. During the resident group meeting held on 7/18/22, at 1:55 P.M., showed the following: -There were eight residents who attended the meeting; -The residents all agreed that they did not receive showers/baths on a regular basis and did not get two showers a week; -Resident #74 said he/she went three weeks without a shower and was finally given one last Wednesday or Thursday. He/she would really like to have a bath at least two times a week; -Resident #13 said he/she finally received a shower on Saturday but it had been nine days since his/her last shower and he/she would like to have a shower two times a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$70,134 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $70,134 — penalty dated 2026-06-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO