Truman Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center
206 West First Street, Lamar, MO 64759 · For profit - Corporation · 109 certified beds · (417) 682-5718 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.8% | 18.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.3% | 1.1% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.4% | 2.3% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.9% | 18.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 4.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.4% | 17.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 39.9% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.8% | 4.5% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.5% | 17.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 41.7% | 23.5% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.2% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.4% | 26.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 21.8% | 13.7% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.18 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.77 | 2.33 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 27.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.8%CMS range 25.1–55.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.2%CMS range 7.2–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 27.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 13.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 18.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 8.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 3.3–12.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 102.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services per standards of practice when the facility staff did not transcribe an order for a urine analysis (UA - a routine diagnostic test that evaluates the physical, chemical, and microscopic properties of your urine. It is primarily used to screen for kidney disease, liver issues, diabetes, and urinary tract infections (UTIs)) timely, when staff did not obtain a sample for the UA timely, and when staff did not notify the physician or document the reason for the delay in obtaining the UA for one resident (Resident #1) resulting in a\\n eight day delay in obtaining the UA sample. The facility census was 104.Review of the facility's policy titled, Lab and Diagnostic Test Results- Clinical Protocol, dated 11/2018, showed the following:-The physician will identify, and order diagnostic and lab testing based on the resident's diagnostic and monitoring needs;-The staff will process the test requisitions and arrange for the tests;-The laboratory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within the required two-hour time frame when staff failed to report an allegation of employee to resident abuse when visitor reported one staff (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B) yelled and cussed at one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 100.Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, not dated, showed the following:-Zero tolerance of verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property, by employees, family members, visitors, or other residents;-Verbal abuse is defined as any use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to a resident or their families, or within hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of verbal abuse include, but are not limited to, threats of harm,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegation of possible abuse were thoroughly investigate when staff failed to complete a timely written investigation of an allegation of employee to resident abuse when a visitor reported one staff (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B) cussed and threatened one resident (Resident #1). The facility census was 100.Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program not dated, showed the following:-If an incident occurs, or there is any allegation that an incident might have occurred, of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property, the Administrator, or designee, will investigate;-The person doing the investigation will complete a resident abuse/neglect investigation report;-The administrator will sign and maintain all completed resident abuse/neglect investigation reports and all investigations will remain confidential, except that the findings and actions shall be reported according to state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment as free of accidents as possible when staff failed to provide standby and/or supervision assistance for one resident (Resident #2) resulting in the resident falling. The facility census was 100. Review of the facility policy titled, Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting, dated 2001, showed the following:-All accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc., occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the administrator;-The nurse supervisor/charge nurse and/or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident;-The following data, as applicable, shall be included on the Report of Incident/Accident form: the date/time the accident/incident took place; the nature of the injury/illness (fall); the circumstances surrounding the accident or incident; where the accident or incident took place; the names of witness and their accounts of the accident or incident;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meals in a timely manner in accordance with each residents' preferences when staff failed to provide a meal tray to one resident (Resident #2) during scheduled mealtimes. The facility census was 100.Review of the facility's policy titled, Frequency of Meals, dated 2001, showed the following: -Each resident shall receive at least three meals daily, at times comparable to typical mealtimes in the community, or in accordance with resident needs, preferences, requests and the plan of care;-The facility will serve at least three meals or their equivalent daily at schedule times. There will not be more than a fourteen-hour span between the evening meal and breakfast.1.Review of Resident #2's face sheet (a brief summary of the resident's medical and admission history) showed the following: -admission date of 03/24/26;-readmission date of 04/09/26;-Diagnoses included coronary artery disease (CAD - a narrowing or blockage of the arteries and vessels that provide oxygen and nutrients to the heart), Parkinson's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was protected from possible contamination at all times while stored, prepared, and served, when staff failed to wear hairnets appropriately while preparing resident's food and staff failed to use proper hand washing and glove use while preparing residents food. The facility census was 102.1. Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2013 Food Code showed the following: -Food employees shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed food; clean equipment, utensils, and linens; and unwrapped single-service and single-use articles. Review of the facility's policy titled Code of Dress and Personal Appearance, dated 2020, showed the following: -All dining services employees will comply with printed and posted personal hygiene guidelines, sanitation practices, and dress codes of the community;-The Dining Services Manager will enforce that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Deficiency Text Not Available
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to employ a qualified dietary manager for food and nutrition services with accredited education in food service management. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's job description titled Director of Food Services, dated 2003, showed the following: -The primary purpose of the job position was to assist the dietician in planning organizing, developing and directing the overall operation of the Food Services Department in accordance with current federal, state and local standards, guidelines and regulations governing our facility, and as may be directed by the Administrator, to assure that quality nutritional services are provided on a daily basis and that the Food Services Department is maintained in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner; -Must be a graduate of an accredited course in dietetic training approved by the American Dietetic Association; -Must be registered as a Food Services Director in this state; -Must be knowledgeable of food services practices and procedures as well as the laws, regulations and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in a manner to protect against contamination and in accordance with standards of practice when staff failed to know the required temperature and sanitation levels and failed to regularly test the temperature and sanitation level and ensure the appropriate water temperature was reached on the dishwashing machine; staff failed maintain the stove, griddle, coffee pot, and the hand washing sink clean and free from debris; and when staff consumed food in the kitchen and dishwashing areas. The facility census was 104. 1. Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2013 Food Code showed the the data plate provides the operator with the fundamental information needed to ensure that the machine is effectively washing, rinsing, and sanitizing equipment and utensils. The ware washing machine had been tested and the information on the data plate represented the parameters that ensured effective operation and sanitization and that need to be monitored. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Review of Resident # 49's face sheet showed the following: -admission date of 12/03/19; -Diagnoses included general anxiety disorder. Review of the resident's annual MDS, dated [DATE], preferences for activities section showed the resident said it was very important to him/her to do things with groups of people, to do his/her favorite activities, and to participate in religious services. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Exhibited no behavioral symptoms; -Functional limitation in range of motion to all four extremities; -Used motorized wheelchair for mobility device; -Independent with eating; -Dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, showers, lower body dressing, and with transfers; -Required partial/moderate assistance of staff with personal hygiene; -Required substantial/maximal assistance of staff with upper body dressing, and rolling from left to right. Review of the resident's current care plan showed staff did not care plan related to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at an appetizing temperature when meals were served colder than resident preference and out of recommended service temperature range. The facility census was 104. Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2013 Food Code showed the following: -Except during preparation, cooking, or cooling, time/temperature control for safety food shall be maintained at 41 degrees Fahrenheit (° F) or less; -Time/temperature control for safety food that is cooked to a temperature and for a time specified and received hot shall be a temperature of 135° F or above. Review of the facility's policy titled Food Preparation and Service, dated 2001, showed the following: -Food and nutrition services employees prepare, distribute, and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices; -Food Distribution means the processes involved in getting food to the resident. This may include holding foods hot on the steam table or under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when the facility failed to ensure the required two step tuberculosis (TB - a communicable disease that affects the lungs characterized by fever, cough, and difficulty breathing) screening test was administered timely for seven staff members (Certified Medication Technician (CMT) F, DA G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) I, CNA J, Registered Nurse (RN) K, and Dietary Aide (DA) E) of ten sampled staff members. The facility staff also failed to wash their hands after providing catheter (a tube that is inserted into the bladder, allowing urine to drain freely) and incontinent care for one resident (Resident #4) The facility census was 104. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Employee Screening for Tuberculosis, revised 03/2021, showed the following: -All employees are screened for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and active tuberculosis (TB) disease using tuberculin skin test (TST - a skin test used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system that assured full, complete, and separate accounting of each resident's personal funds when one staff (Activity Director) had the money of one resident (Resident #49) placed in his/her own personal account for resident shopping without facility maintained record keeping regarding the transactions. The resident census was 104. Review of the facility policy titled, Management of Resident's Personal Funds, revised March 2021, showed the following: -The resident may manage his or her own personal funds; -The resident may designate a representative to manage his or her personal funds; -The resident may apply to the Social Security Administration to have a representative payee designated for purposes of federal and state benefits to which he or she may be entitled; -The resident may have the facility hold, safeguard, and manage his or her personal funds; -Should the resident elect to have the facility manage his or her personal funds, it is authorized in writing by the resident or the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect each resident's right to be free from abuse from staff, when a staff member continued to provide cares to a resident against the resident's wishes and refusals for one resident (Resident #17). The facility had a census of 104. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, undated, showed the following: -The facility will not tolerate verbal (any use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to a resident or their families or within hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability), sexual (non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident), physical (not limited to hitting, biting, kicking), or mental (humiliation, harassment, and threat of punishment or deprivation) abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion (separation of a resident ), neglect, or misappropriation of resident property (deliberate misplacement, exploitation), by employees, family members, visitors, or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure complete assessments regarding the appropriate use of a restraint before use when the facility failed to document an evaluation and consent for the use of a restraint, failed to obtain a physician order for restraint use, failed to care plan restraint use, and failed to document ongoing re-evaluations of the need for the restraint for one resident (Resident #77). The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's policy, titled Use of Restraints, revised April 2017, showed the following information: -Restraints may only be used if the resident has a specific medical symptom that cannot be addressed by another less restrictive intervention, and a restraint is required to treat the medical symptom, protect the resident's safety, and help the resident attain the highest level of his/her physical and psychological well-being; -Prior to placing the restraint on the resident, there shall be a pre-restraining assessment and review to determine the need for restraints. The assessment shall be used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were reported immediately to management and within two hours to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) when possible abuse was witnessed by staff involving two residents (Resident #32 and #57). The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, undated, showed the following: -The facility will not tolerate verbal (any use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to a resident or their families or within hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability), sexual (non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident), physical (not limited to hitting, biting, kicking), or mental (humiliation, harassment, and threat of punishment or deprivation) abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion (separation of a resident ), neglect, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of possible abuse were thoroughly investigated and the investigation provided to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) within five days when possible abuse was witnessed by staff involving two residents (Resident #32 and #57). The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention Program, undated, showed the following: -The facility will not tolerate verbal (any use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to a resident or their families or within hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability), sexual (non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident), physical (not limited to hitting, biting, kicking), or mental (humiliation, harassment, and threat of punishment or deprivation) abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion (separation of a resident ), neglect, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals were appropriately screened prior to being placed in nursing home when the facility failed to obtain and/or maintain documentation of a level one and level two Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for one resident (Resident #56) . The facility census was 104. Review of the document the facility provided as their policy titled Pre-admission Screening and Annual Review (PASARR), dated 04/03/25, showed the following: -A PASARR form is required in every record. The discharge planner or facility is to be advised by the person taking the inquiry that the PASARR form must be complete prior to any new admission; -PASARR screenings are required on any resident who is placed in a state licensed only bed, who is directly transferred to your Medicaid bed from a Medicaid bed in another facility, and/or transferred from a hospital for placement in a Medicaid certified bed who occupied a Medicaid bed to hospital to Medicaid bed; -Completion of the PASARR form is the level I screening. A level II…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for all residents when staff failed to care plan regarding dementia, skin integrity, and multiple medications/diagnoses for two residents (Resident #92 and #61). The facility census was 104. Review of a facility policy titled Dementia-Clinical Protocol, revised November 2018, showed the following: -As part of the initial assessment, the physician will help identify individuals who have been diagnosed as having dementia or otherwise impaired cognition; -For the individual with confirmed dementia, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize remaining function of life; -For the individual with confirmed dementia, the IDT will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize remaining function and quality of life; -Direct care staff will support the resident in initiating and completing activities and tasks of daily living; -The staff will monitor the individual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify the need for restorative therapy, failed to care plan the need for restorative therapy, and failed to provide restorative therapy services to ensure residents did not experience unavoidable reductions in range of motion and maintained maximum practical independence/range of mobility for two residents (Resident #77 and #49) who were at risk for a decline in mobility. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's policy titled Restorative Nursing Services, revised July 2017, showed the following information: -Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitative services; -Residents may be started on a restorative nursing program upon admission, during the course of stay, or when discharged from rehabilitative care; -Restorative goals and objectives are individualized and resident-centered, and are outlined in the resident's plan of care; -The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment remained free of accident hazards when the facility failed to document complete and accurate smoking assessments and care plan smoking for two residents (Resident # 1 and Resident #82) and when the facility when one resident (Resident #1) was found to have multiple marijuana vape pens on his/her bedside table. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's policy titled, Smoking- Residents, revised August 2022, showed the following information: -Prior to and upon admission, residents are informed of the facility smoking policy, including designated smoking areas, and to the extent to which the facility can accommodate their smoking or non-smoking preferences; -Resident smoking status is evaluated upon admission. If a smoker, the evaluation includes current level of tobacco consumption, method of tobacco consumption, desire to quit smoking, and ability to smoke safely with or without supervision (per completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document identification and use of possible alternatives prior to the use of side rails; failed to document assessing risk versus benefits of side rail use; failed to obtain a complete informed consent for the use of side rails prior to installation; failed to care plan side rails and failed to complete ongoing assessments to ensure the side rails are safe and appropriate for use for two residents (Resident #90 and Resident #92). The facility census was 104. Review of a facility policy titled Bed Safety and Bed Rails, dated August 2022, showed the following: -The use of bed rails is prohibited unless the criteria for bed rails have been met; -Regardless of mattress type, width, length, and/or depth, the bed rail, bed frame, and mattress will leave no gap wide enough to trap a resident's face or body; -Maintenance staff routinely inspects all beds and related equipment to identify risks and problems including entrapment risks; -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication regime was free from unnecessary medications when the facility staff failed to document targeted behavioral symptoms supporting the use of an antipsychotic medication and failed to document behaviors warranting the use for one resident (Resident #75) on a physician ordered anti-psychotic medication. The facility had a census of 104. Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated July 2022, showed the following: -Residents will not receive medications that are not clinically indicated to treat a specific condition; -A psychotropic medication is any medication that affects brain activity associated with mental processes and behavior; -Drugs in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications and are subject to prescribing, monitoring, and review requirements specific to psychotropic medications: Anti-psychotics, anti-depressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics; -Residents, families, and/or the representative are involved in the medication management…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% when staff made three errors out of 31 opportunities resulting in an 9.68% error rate affecting two residents (Resident #76 and #45). The facility had a census of 104. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, showed the following: -The Director of Nursing (DON) supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions; -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame; -The individual administering the medication checks the label to verify the right resident, right mediation, right dosage, right time, right documentation, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication; -Vital signs and medication allergies should be checked prior to administration of medications, if indicated; -The individual administering the medication initials the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed ensure all residents were free of significant medication errors when staff administered one resident's (Resident #76) high blood pressure medication against physician orders by not following perimeters included on the order. The facility was census of 104. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, showed the following: -The Director of Nursing (DON) supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions; -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame; -The individual administering the medication checks the label to verify the right resident, right mediation, right dosage, right time, right documentation, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication; -Vital signs and medication allergies should be checked prior to administration of medications, if indicated; -The individual administering the medication initials the resident's Medication Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation of personal property when a staff member took two narcotic pain medication tablets from Resident #5's supply and when Resident #6, had over $700 of fraudulent purchases on his/her debit card made by a facility employee. The effected two sampled residents. The facility census was 98. Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, dated 1999, showed the following: -Objective: Zero tolerance of verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property, by employees, family members, or other residents; -To develop and implement a system for identifying, preventing, and reporting any incident, or suspected incident, of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property; -Misappropriation of resident property is defined as the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the highest quality of care and ensure that all residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when the facility failed to document care and treatment refusals for one resident (Resident #2) with skin concerns, that ultimately led to infection. The facility census was 98. Review of the facility's undated policy, titled Wound and Skin Care Protocols, showed the following information: -The Director of Nursing (DON) will be responsible for reviewing weekly wound reports and monitoring progress/decline of any wound and assuring compliance with current standards of would care practice; -The interdisciplinary plan of care will address problems, goals, and interventions directed toward the prevention and/or treatment of impaired skin integrity/pressure injuries. Review of the facility's undated policy, titled Assessment and Documentation, showed the following information: -Assess the wound etiology, resident's overall condition, nutritional needs, pain/pain control,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the highest quality of care when the facility failed to accurately and completely monitor and document wounds on the skin assessments and care plan pressure ulcers/injuries (skin injuries caused by prolonged pressure, friction, or shear, resulting in tissue damage) for one resident, Resident #1. The facility census was 98. Review of the facility's undated policy, titled Wound and Skin Care Protocols, showed the following information: -The Director of Nursing (DON) will be responsible for reviewing weekly wound reports and monitoring progress/decline of any wound and assuring compliance with current standards of would care practice; -All residents will be assessed by the charge nurse for risk of skin breakdown using the Braden scale ( a tool filled out by facility staff, used to assess a resident's risk of developing pressure injuries) on admission, re-admission, and with any major change in condition; -The interdisciplinary plan of care will address problems, goals, and interventions directed toward…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident when Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D brought narcotic pain medication tablets into the facility and placed them into the bubble pack medication card for one resident (Resident #5) and a staff member subsequently administered one dose of the medication to the resident. The facility census was 98. 1. Review of Resident #5's face sheet showed: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses of chronic pain, low back pain, anxiety disorder, major depression, and stroke. Review of the resident's care plan revised on 05/25/25, showed: -Resident is at risk for increased pain and discomfort related to a diagnosis of chronic pain; -Follow up with the resident's physician and pain management as needed; -Medication provided as prescribed; -Monitor for effectiveness of medication; -Monitor for increased pain and discomfort; -Provide diversionary activities as needed; -Therapy to screen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (Department of Health and Senior Services - DHSS) an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse involving two resident (Resident #1 and Resident #2) within required two hours time frame. The facility census was 91. Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated 2017, showed the following: -All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and /or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by the facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported; -All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of property, will be reported by the facility Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-14 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified Director of Food and Nutrition services. Failure to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, created the potential for the 93 residents to receive insufficient nutrition services. Review of the job description for the Dietary Manager position was not provided by the facility. 1. Interview during the initial tour of the facility kitchen on 07/11/23, at 10:17 AM, showed the dietary staff stated that they had been without a Dietary Manager for the past three months. During an interview on 07/13/23, at 3:45 P.M., the Administrator stated the Dietary Manager quit on 04/27/23 and that she and the Office Manager were overseeing the kitchen. The Administrator said the Dietician was employed on a consultant basis, not full time or part time. The Dietician was in the facility twice a month for six to eight hours. Neither the Administrator nor the Office Manager held a dietary manger certificate or a food service manager…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for one of four halls, the secured dementia care unit. The failure created the potential for an undesirable living situation for the 25 residents residing on the secured unit. Review of the facility Maintenance Service Policy, dated 12/09, revealed the following: -Maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment; -The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times; -Functions of maintenance personnel include, but are not limited to maintaining the building in compliance with current federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and guidelines; maintaining the building in good repair and free from hazards; maintaining lighting levels that are comfortable, and assuring that exit lights are in good working order; establishing priorities in providing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system at all times when the facility did not ensure all residents had working call lights at all times. Review of the facility's policy titled, Call System/Light Policy, dated 09/22, showed the residents call system remains functional at all times. If visual communication is used, the lights remain functional. 1. Review of Resident #53's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/18/23, showed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident cognitively intact. The resident's DS also indicated that the resident required total assistance for incontinent care. The resident required a Hoyer lift (which allows a person to be lifted and transferred with a minimum of physical effort)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, regarding flies, for the entire facility of 93 residents. Review of the facility's Pest Control Contract, showed the contract, dated 12/12/13, was for monthly service for pest management program designed to provide solution to the common pests found around the outside foundation environment including roaches, ants, house spider, mice/rats, millipedes, centipedes, [NAME] and pill bugs, crickets, silverfish, earwigs. There was no identification of fly treatment or service to the blue light, bug zappers. 1. Observations of the facility, by four surveyors, during the survey of 07/11/23 to 07/14/23, showed an excessive number of flies. The flies were all throughout the facility including the kitchen, dining rooms, on residents' food, persons, and equipment. Observations were made from 9:00 A.M. to 6:30 P.M. on 07/11/23; from 8:30 A.M. to 6:30 P.M. on 07/12/23; from 8:30 A.M. to 5:45 P.M. on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two of 19 residents (Resident #19 and #76), in a total sample of 42 residents, was afforded the opportunity to be included in all aspects of person-centered care planning. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Participation - Assessment/Care Plan, revised February 2021, showed the resident and his or her legal representative are encouraged to attend and participate in the resident's assessment and in the development of the resident's person-centered care plan. Spouses and other members of the family may participate in the resident assessment and development of the person-centered care plan with the resident's permission. 1. Review of Resident #19's Face Sheet, provided by the facility, showed the following: -admission date of 06/05/13; -Diagnoses included morbid (severe) obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (a disorder in which a person does not take enough breaths per minute), and major depressive disorder. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated assessment tool…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 51) had a physician's order in the medical record and was assessed and care planned for the self-administration of medications. This failure increased the risk of incomplete or inaccurate administration of medication for the resident. Review of the facility-provided policy titled Self-Administration of Medication, revised 02/21, showed the following: -Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe; -If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care plan; -Self-administered medications are stored in a safe and secure place, which is not accessible by other residents; -Any medications found at the bedside that are not authorized for self-administration are turned over to the nurse in charge for return to the family or responsible party; -Nursing staff review the self-administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a process in place to identify and address weight loss for one resident (Resident #25) of one resident with possible weight loss, in a sample of 42 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Participation - Assessments/Care Plans, revised on February 2021, showed the following regarding care planning process: -Facilitates the inclusion of the resident and/or representative; -Includes an assessment of the resident's strengths and his/her needs; -Incorporates the residents personal and cultural preferences in establishing goals of care. 1. Review of the Resident #25's Face Sheet, showed the following: -admission date of 03/17/23; -Diagnoses included of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration.), and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage). Review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #30) of one resident in the sample of 43 received appropriate and timely assistance and his/her pain was controlled when he/she fell out of bed during the night shift. Review of Lippincott Nursing Procedures, eighth edition, Wolters Kluwer 2019: Pain Management pp. 570-572, showed the following: -To assess pain properly, staff need to consider the resident's description and staff's observations of the resident's physical and behavioral response; -Ask the resident to rank the pain on a scale from 0-10, with 0 denoting lack of pain and 10 denoting the worst pain possible; -Reassess and respond to the resident's pain by evaluating the response to treatment and progress toward pain management goals; -Document each step of the nursing process; -Describe the subjective information elicited from the patient, using the resident's own words; -Note the location, quality, and duration of the pain; -Record the pain-relief method selected and the resident's rating of the pain before and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-14 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interivew, the facility failed to ensure that the Facility Assessment listed all the services provided by the facility, inlcuding tracheostomy (a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating an opening into the trachea (windpipe) from outside the neck) care. This affected one of 93 residents (Resident #64). 1. Review of Resident #64's paper medical record Face Sheet revealed showed the following: -admission date of 09/17/20; -Diagnoses included traumatic brain injury (TBI), tracheostomy, and seizures. Review of the resident's paper medical record Physician Orders for July 2023 showed the resident was to have tracheostomy changed out as needed, suction airway as needed, tracheostomy care each shift, and change tracheostomy every month on the 15th. Review of the form titled, Facility Assessment Tool, dated 03/21/23, showed the following: -The facility assessment included an evaluation of the resident populations and available facility resources and services to ensure person centered care needs are completely met; -Table 1.5 Care and Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect food from possible contamination when the staff failed to complete hand hygiene or change gloves between tasks; failed to dry dishes properly and stacked dishes wet; and when staff stored dented cans on the shelf to be used in food preparation. The facility census was 92. 1. Record review of the 2013 Food Code, issued by the Food and Drug Administration, showed the following: -After cleaning and sanitizing, equipment and utensils shall be air-dried or used after adequate draining before contact with food. - Items must be allowed to drain and to air-dry before being stacked or stored. Stacking wet items such as pans prevents them from drying and may allow an environment where microorganisms can begin to grow. Observation of the kitchen on 11/18/19, at 1:43 P.M., showed seven 4-quart storage containers stacked wet on shelves in the walk-in storage space. Observation on 11/19/19, at 8:45 A.M., showed the following: -Seven 4-quart containers stacked wet in storage area; -Two cereal containers stacked wet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to document completion of measurements to ensure the there were no gaps that's could potentially cause injury or entrapment for ten residents (Resident #8, #19, #27, #29, #44, #47, #57, #77, #80, and #85). Staff failed to obtain physician's orders for, care plan, or obtain signed consent for the use of side rails for one resident (Resident #29). The facility census was 92. Record review of the facility's policy titled Bed Safety, dated December 2007, included the following information: -The resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team, considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and family regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment; -To try to prevent death/injuries from the beds and related equipment (including the frame, mattress, side rails, headboard, footboard, and bed accessories), the facility shall promote…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure the medication error rate was less than five percent when facility staff failed to administer medications according to the physician's orders and standards of practice resulting in 18 medication errors out of 26 opportunities. This practice affected five residents (Resident #54, #59, #74, #80, and #238). The medication error rate was 69.23%. The facility census was 92. Record review of the facility's Administering Medications Policy, dated April 2019, showed the following: -The Director of Nursing (DON) Services supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications and/or have related functions; -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame; -Medications are administered within one hour of their prescribed time unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). 1. Record review of Resident # 54's face sheet (general resident information) in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure administer antibiotics (medications to treat infections) as ordered for one resident (Resident # 29) and failed to follow-up with a physician's orders to recheck a urinalysis sample after treatment with an antibiotic for one resident (Resident # 80), both who had UTIs (urinary tract infection). Staff failed to update the care plans of two residents (Resident #29 and #80) regarding recent UTIs. The facility census was 92. Record review of the facility's Urinary Tract Infections/Bacteriuria (bacteria in the urine) - Clinical Protocol Policy, dated April 2018, showed the following: -The physician and nursing staff will review the status of individuals who are being treated for a UTI and adjust treatments accordingly. Record review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Policy, dated December 2016, showed the following: -When a C&S is ordered, lab results and the current clinical situation will be communicated to the prescriber as soon as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to properly disinfect glucometers (small hand-held devices that check blood glucose levels in residents) when collecting blood glucose (sugar that the bloodstream carries to all cells in the body to supply energy) levels on residents and failed to protect the glucometer test strips from potential contamination. This practice affected two residents (Resident #51 & #238). The facility census was 92. Record review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website showed the following information: -Blood glucometers approved for use for more than one person must be cleaned and disinfected. When blood glucose monitoring devices are shared between individuals, there is a risk of transmitting viral hepatitis (infection that causes liver inflammation and damage) and other blood borne pathogens (infectious microorganisms in human blood that can cause disease in humans). Record review of the facility's Cleaning & Disinfecting the Microdot Blood Glucose Meter, undated, showed the following information:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CIRCLE B ENTERPRISES — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.1 | -2.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.0 | +2.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THE LAMAR EXEMPT TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | 100% | since 04/23/2004 |
| BEDELL, DONALD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/23/2004 |
| BEAIRD, TODD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| AGH1 LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/06/2025 |
| JOUSTRA, CLARENCE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/1992 |
| SELVEY, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| BEDELL, BRYAN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/12/2025 |
| BEDELL, PAMELA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/11/2025 |
| DCB REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP LP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/31/2012 |
| FG LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2016 |
| FORVIS MAZARS LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/16/2021 |
| LAMAR RE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/31/2012 |
| MID STATES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| VAN DE VEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2000 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265253. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.